Feasibility of adapting the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery trainer box to endoscopic skills training tool

Using design thinking to create and implement a 3D digital library of anatomical specimens

Design thinking (DT) is a five-stage process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test) that guides the creation of user-centered solutions to complex problems. DT is in common use outside of science but has rarely been applied to anatomical education. The use of DT in this study identified the need for flexible access to anatomical specimens outside of the anatomy laboratory and guided the creation of a digital library of three-dimensional (3D) anatomical specimens (3D Anatomy Viewer). To test whether the resource was fit for purpose, a mixed-methods student evaluation was undertaken. Student surveys (n = 46) were employed using the system usability scale (SUS) and an unvalidated acceptability questionnaire. These verified that 3D Anatomy Viewer was usable (SUS of 72%) and acceptable (agreement range of 77%-93% on all Likert-type survey statements, Cronbach's alpha = 0.929). Supplementary interviews (n = 5) were analyzed through content analysis and revealed three main themes: (1) a credible online supplementary learning resource; (2) learning anatomy with 3D realism and interactivity; (3) user recommendations for expanding the number of anatomical models, test questions, and gamification elements. These data demonstrate that a DT framework can be successfully applied to anatomical education for creation of a practical learning resource. Anatomy educators should consider employing a DT framework where student-centered solutions to learner needs are required.

Original Training for Laparoscopic Surgery by Making an Origami Paper Crane

INTRODUCTION

The training box is an effective tool used by surgical trainees. Suturing training is the common method of practicing laparoscopic surgery; however, the cost of needles and threads for long-term practice remains a problem. In this study, we incorporated the original Japanese training for laparoscopic surgery by making an origami paper crane (laparoscopic origami training (LOT)) and evaluated its effect on the clinical results as a long-term practice.

METHODS

LOT was performed using a single 7.5 × 7.5 cm origami paper in the training box of laparoscopic surgery. In the bench-top study, the total time required to make one paper crane was measured and evaluated, and a self-efficacy questionnaire was designed to analyze the efficacy of LOT. In clinical practice, we retrospectively compared two resident groups, one that had previously trained on LOT (trained group) and the other that did not (less-trained group), by analyzing the pneumoperitoneum time (PT) for 10 cases.

RESULTS

After making paper cranes in approximately 100 cases, the making time was reduced to approximately 10 min. Long-term results analyzing up to 1500 cases revealed that in addition to shortening the time required to make a paper crane, the shape of the crane also improved. Consequently, the median PT was significantly shorter in the trained group than in the less-trained group (129.0 (62-287) versus 208.5 (127-343) min; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

LOT contributed to introducing safe laparoscopic surgery to residents and improved their laparoscopic outcomes. We believe that this is a useful practice methodology that can be recommended to general physicians who wish to practice laparoscopic surgeries.

Democratizing Flexible Endoscopy Training: Noninferiority Randomized Trial Comparing a Box-Trainer vs a Virtual Reality Simulator to Prepare for the Fundamental of Endoscopic Surgery Exam

BACKGROUND

A considerable number of surgical residents fail the mandated endoscopy exam despite having completed the required clinical cases. Low-cost endoscopy box trainers (BTs) could democratize training; however, their effectiveness has never been compared with higher-cost virtual reality simulators (VRSs).

STUDY DESIGN

In this randomized noninferiority trial, endoscopy novices trained either on the VRS used in the Fundamental of Endoscopic Surgery manual skills (FESms) exam or a validated BT-the Basic Endoscopic Skills Training (BEST) box. Trainees were tested at fixed timepoints on the FESms and on standardized ex vivo models. The primary endpoint was FESms improvement at 1 week. Secondary endpoints were FESms improvement at 2 weeks, FESms pass rates, ex vivo tests performance, and trainees' feedback.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven trainees completed the study. VRS and BT trainees showed comparable FESms improvements (25.16 ± 14.29 vs 25.58 ± 11.75 FESms points, respectively; p = 0.89), FESms pass rates (76.32% vs 61.54%, respectively; p = 0.16) and total ex vivo tasks completion times (365.76 ± 237.56 vs 322.68 ± 186.04 seconds, respectively; p = 0.55) after 1 week. Performances were comparable also after 2 weeks of training, but FESms pass rates increased significantly only in the first week. Trainees were significantly more satisfied with the BT platform (3.97 ± 1.20 vs 4.81 ± 0.40 points on a 5-point Likert scale for the VRS and the BT, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation-based training is an effective means to develop competency in endoscopy, especially at the beginning of the learning curve. Low-cost BTs like the BEST box compare well with high-tech VRSs and could help democratize endoscopy training.

The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices

Background

Human-centered design (HCD) approaches to health care strive to support the development of innovative, effective, and person-centered solutions for health care. Although their use is increasing, there is no integral overview describing the details of HCD methods in health innovations.

Objective

This review aims to explore the current practices of HCD approaches for the development of health innovations, with the aim of providing an overview of the applied methods for participatory and HCD processes and highlighting their shortcomings for further research.

Methods

A narrative review of health research was conducted based on systematic electronic searches in the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts (2000-2020) databases using keywords related to human-centered design, design thinking (DT), and user-centered design (UCD). Abstracts and full-text articles were screened by 2 reviewers independently based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on the methodology used throughout the research process, the choice of methods in different phases of the innovation cycle, and the level of engagement of end users.

Results

This review summarizes the application of HCD practices across various areas of health innovation. All approaches prioritized the user’s needs and the participatory and iterative nature of the design process. The design processes comprised several design cycles during which multiple qualitative and quantitative methods were used in combination with specific design methods. HCD- and DT-based research primarily targeted understanding the research context and defining the problem, whereas UCD-based work focused mainly on the direct generation of solutions. Although UCD approaches involved end users primarily as testers and informants, HCD and DT approaches involved end users most often as design partners.

Conclusions

We have provided an overview of the currently applied methodologies and HCD guidelines to assist health care professionals and design researchers in their methodological choices. HCD-based techniques are challenging to evaluate using traditional biomedical research methods. Previously proposed reporting guidelines are a step forward but would require a level of detail that is incompatible with the current publishing landscape. Hence, further development is needed in this area. Special focus should be placed on the congruence between the chosen methods, design strategy, and achievable outcomes. Furthermore, power dimensions, agency, and intersectionality need to be considered in co-design sessions with multiple stakeholders, especially when including vulnerable groups.

Making sense of design thinking: A primer for medical teachers

An increasing number of medical teachers have taken an interest in design thinking, which has been used for years in business, law, and technology sectors. Yet, what does design thinking mean, and how has it been applied in medical education? This commentary discusses design thinking from multiple perspectives. First, it overviews, briefly, the historical development of design thinking, which medical education literature has seldom addressed in detail. Second, it synthesizes three current understandings of design thinking across disciplines: design thinking as a cognitive style, as a process of creativity and innovation, and as an organizational attribute. Third, it presents a 'roundup' of design thinking initiatives that have been applied at preclinical and clinical levels, including programs, courses, workshops, and hackathons. To conclude, the commentary suggests future directions for medical teachers interested in design thinking. Although design thinking is showing promise in medical education, there is substantial work to be done theoretically and practically.

Application of Laparoscopy in Comprehensive Staging Operation of Ovarian Cancer Based on Electronic Medical Blockchain Technology

Ovarian cancer has always entangled most women. Studies have shown that the prevalence of ovarian cancer ranks third in female reproductive malignancies, and the mortality rate has always been the highest. The reason is mainly because the diagnosis and treatment of preovarian cancer has always been a big problem. However, the emergence of laparoscopy can well solve this problem, especially laparoscopy assisted by blockchain technology, which plays a huge role in the overall staging of ovarian cancer. This article proposes the application research of laparoscopy in the comprehensive staging of ovarian cancer based on electronic medical blockchain technology. First of all, this article uses the literature method to study the clinical characteristics and surgical classification of ovarian cancer, as well as the application status of blockchain technology and laparoscopic technology. Secondly, it designed an application experiment based on electronic medical blockchain technology to assist laparoscopy in the comprehensive staging of ovarian cancer and analyzed the comparison of the laparoscopic group and the control group in the comprehensive staging of ovarian cancer. The results of the study showed that the amount of bleeding in the laparoscopic group was 103.5 ml, while the amount of bleeding in the control group was 141.1 ml; the proportion of tertiary pain in the laparoscopic group was 11.37%, and the proportion of tertiary pain in the control group was 31.82%. From this, it can be seen that, in the comprehensive staging operation for ovarian cancer, the laparoscopic group has less intraoperative blood loss than the control group and lower pain, and the treatment effect is better.

Development and prospective validation of a scoring system for the Basic Endoscopic Skills Training (BEST) box

AIMS

The increased use of endoscopy as a minimally invasive therapeutic technique has created a great demand for endoscopic training. The Basic Endoscopic Skills Training (BEST) box provides a low-cost solution by adapting the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) box for flexible endoscopic simulation. The BEST box consists of six endoscopic tasks with a 5-min time limit per task. This study aims to develop a scoring system for objective evaluation of user performance.

METHODS

A total of 165 participants were tested on the BEST box. Participants were divided into two groups: retrospective analysis (n = 100) and prospective analysis (n = 65). From the retrospective group, 55 individuals were also scored on the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills-Upper Endoscopy (GAGES-UE). Linear regression between user performance on BEST box and GAGES-UE was performed to develop the scoring system. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was used to determine a threshold score to help users appreciate their endoscopic expertise. Prospective scoring of 65 individuals was then performed using the formula developed (20 experts and 45 trainees).

RESULTS

The minimum and maximum possible scores are 30 and 110, respectively. Retrospective analysis showed that the scoring system was able to distinguish between experts and trainees (p < 0.001), correlated with GAGES-UE (p < 0.001), and had a reliability constant of r = 0.765 (p < 0.001). On prospective testing using the scoring system the expert group received a final average score of 92, whereas the average score for the trainee group was 61 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The developed BEST box scoring system correlates with the experience level of the test taker as well as with the GAGES-UE scoring system. The results of this study add further evidence to the validity of the BEST box as an effective, low-cost endoscopic simulator with the scores used by trainees to track their performance level overtime.

A curriculum to democratize and standardize flexible endoscopy fundamental knowledge and skills: a critical review of the first 5 years of a surgical endoscopy university diploma

BACKGROUND

As flexible endoscopy offers many advantages to patients, access to training should be aggressively encouraged. In 2014, the IRCAD-IHU-Strasbourg launched a year-long university diploma using advanced education methods to offer surgeons and gastroenterologists high-quality, personalized training in flexible endoscopy. This paper describes and critically reviews the first 5 years of the University Diploma in Surgical Endoscopy (UDSE).

METHODS

The UDSE aims to progressively transmit theoretical knowledge, clinical judgment, and practical skills on basic and advanced flexible endoscopy. The 300-h year-long curriculum is composed of 100 h of online lectures with tests, 150 h of clinical rotations and 50 h of hands-on sessions. The hands-on training is delivered through validated mechanical simulators, virtual reality simulators, and specifically designed ex vivo and in vivo animal models. Participants' demographics, training, and clinical experience were recorded. Trainees' evaluations of each online lecture, hands-on training, and clinical rotations were assessed using a Likert scale from 1 (not satisfactory) to 5 (outstanding). Trainees' skill progression was evaluated using the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES) proficiency test. Finally, clinical uptake was surveyed.

RESULTS

162 (79.01% males) trainees from 38 countries enrolled and successfully completed the first 5 courses. The vast majority of the trainees were surgeons and 19.14% were gastroenterologist. Sixty-nine (42.59%) participants were residents and 97 (56.79%) had no prior experience in flexible endoscopy. The online lectures, on-site sessions, and clinical rotations were highly appreciated receiving an overall average score of 4.33/5, 4.56/5, 4.43/5, respectively. Trainees' endoscopic skills improved significantly (16.68 vs. 20.53 GAGES scores; p = 0.016). At an average of 18.83 months following the course, 31 alumni (77.50% of repliers) started to use a flexible endoscope in their practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Over its 5-year evolution, the UDSE has proven to be a valid means to ease access to the fundamental knowledge, practical skills, and clinical judgment necessary to achieve proficiency in surgical endoscopy.

Feasibility of the Epiduroscopy Simulator as a Training Tool: A Pilot Study

Epiduroscopy is a type of spinal intervention that visualizes the epidural space through the sacral hiatus using a fiberoptic scope. However, it is technically difficult to perform compared to conventional interventions and susceptible to complications. Surgery simulator has been shown to be a promising modality for medical education. To develop the epiduroscopy simulator and prove its usefulness for epiduroscopy training, we performed a case-control study including a total of 20 physicians. The participants were classified as the expert group with more than 30 epiduroscopy experiences and the beginner group with less experience. A virtual simulator (EpiduroSIM™, BioComputing Lab, KOREATECH, Cheonan, Republic of Korea) for epiduroscopy was developed by the authors. The performance of the participants was measured by three items: time to reach a virtual target, training score, and number of times the dura and nerve are violated. The training score was better in the expert group (75.00 vs. 67.50; P < 0.01). The number of violations was lower in the expert group (3.50 vs. 4.0; P < 0.01). The realism of the epidural simulator was evaluated to be acceptable in 40%. Participants improved their simulator skills through repeated attempts. The epiduroscopy simulator helped participants understand the anatomical structure and actual epiduroscopy.

Effect of backlash hysteresis of surgical tool bending joints on task performance in teleoperated flexible endoscopic robot

BACKGROUND

The tendon-sheath mechanism provides flexibility but degrades the task performance of the flexible endoscopic robot because of the inherent backlash hysteresis problem. Previous studies have only focused on reducing backlash hysteresis. The goal of this study is to identify the backlash hysteresis criteria of surgical tool bending joints to maintain efficient surgical performance.

METHODS

A test platform for a surgical tool has been developed that has initial backlash hysteresis under 5° and can adjust the backlash hysteresis intentionally. Performance variation has been investigated in three bench-top endoscopic tasks in which various backlash hysteresis conditions were intentionally adjusted.

RESULTS

A clear drop-off in task performance has been observed when the backlash hysteresis of the bending joints was greater than 10° regardless of the type of task and link length.

CONCLUSIONS

The backlash hysteresis of surgical tool bending joints should be reduced to at least 10° to maintain efficient performance in robotic endoscopic surgery.

Correlation of surgical trainee performance on laparoscopic versus endoscopic simulation

BACKGROUND

Both laparoscopy and endoscopy are image-based procedures, which are less intuitive than traditional open surgery and require extensive training to reach adequate proficiency. Currently, there is lack of understanding as to how the skills in one image-based procedure translate to another, such as endoscopy to laparoscopy and vice versa. The aim of our study was to explore the relationship between endoscopic and laparoscopic skills using a Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) trainer, a traditional virtual reality endoscopic trainer and a "desk-top" endoscopic physical simulator.

METHODS

Senior surgical residents from across Canada participating in an advanced laparoscopic foregut training course were enrolled in the study. Participants were assessed performing the FLS laparoscopic suturing task, the Endobubble 2 task (Simbionix, GI Mentor), and a forward viewing peg transfer on the novel Basics in Endoscopic Skills Training Box (BEST Box).

RESULTS

There was significant correlation between the participant's skill in simulated laparoscopic suturing and simulated endoscopic skill using the BEST box (Pearson coefficient (r) was 0.551 (p = 0.033) and the coefficient of determination (r²) was 0.304). There was a trend towards correlation between laparoscopic suturing time and Endobubble 2 score, but this did not reach statistical significance (r = 0.458, p = 0.086; r² = 0.210).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance in the two physical simulators, laparoscopic suturing and simulated flexible endoscopy using the BEST box, showed a correlation. This study adds to the growing body of evidence that laparoscopic and endoscopic skills are complementary and has the potential to impact simulation training involving both skill sets.