Can we better predict readmission for dehydration following creation of a diverting loop ileostomy: development and validation of a prediction model and web-based risk calculator

Summary of Best Evidence for the Dietary Management in Patients with High-Output Ileostomy

Objective

This study aims to systematically search, screen, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence related to the dietary management of patients with high-output ileostomy, providing an evidence-based reference for the dietary management tailored to this specific demographic.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including BMJ best practice, Up to Date, Guidelines International Network, Medlive, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, JBI, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases. Additional searches included websites of professional organizations such as the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Chinese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, World Council of Enterostomal Therapists, United Ostomy Associations of America, and International Ostomy Association. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included literature and extracted and summarized the evidence.

Results

Eighteen articles were included: 2 clinical decision documents, 5 guidelines, 3 expert consensus statements, 6 expert opinions, and 2 evidence summaries. Thirty pieces of evidence were synthesized, covering nutritional risk screening, dietary guidance, dietary behavior guidance, health education, and follow-up care.

Conclusion

The summarized best evidence is scientific and comprehensive, offering an evidence-based guide for healthcare professionals managing the dietary needs of patients with high-output ileostomy.

Impact of the Diverting Stoma on Renal Function

BACKGROUND

Although loop ileostomy as a diverting stoma has been considered to affect renal dysfunction, few reports have compared loop colostomy with loop ileostomy regarding renal function. This is an important issue in the current setting of increased opportunities to perform surgery on patients with poor renal function.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to reveal the effect of ileostomy on renal dysfunction compared to colostomy after sphincter-preserving rectal surgery.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis. We compared preoperative and postoperative values of blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single academic institution in Osaka, Japan.

PATIENTS

From October 2013 to November 2021, 135 consecutive patients who underwent rectal surgery with diverting stoma were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in pre- and postoperative renal function values by stoma creation site in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease. Risk factors for patients with newly developed kidney disease after stoma creation.

RESULTS

In the preoperative chronic kidney disease (+) patients, the differences between the pre- and postoperative values of blood urea nitrogen ( p = 0.047) and serum creatinine ( p = 0.028) were higher than in the preoperative chronic kidney disease (-) patients. In the preoperative chronic kidney disease (+) patients, ileostomy was significantly associated with an elevation of the serum creatinine value ( p = 0.025) and a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate value ( p = 0.041) from preoperative values compared with that of colostomy. In multivariate analysis, ileostomy (OR; 7.443, p = 0.011) and hypertension (4.226, p = 0.008) were independent risk factors of newly developed kidney disease postoperatively.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations to our study include its retrospective nature and bias because of the stoma site being determined by each surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

We should take care to choose diverting stoma especially in patients with a risk of kidney dysfunction. See Video Abstract .

IMPACTO DE UNA OSTOMA DE DERIVACIN SOBRE LA FUNCIN RENAL

ANTECEDENTES:Apesar de haberse considerado que la ileostomía en asa de derivación afecta la función renal, pocos informes han comparado la colostomía de asa con la ileostomía de asa y ambas con respecto a la función renal. Esta es un problema importante en el contexto actual de mayores oportunidades para realizar cirugía en pacientes con función renal deficitaria.OBJETIVO:El presente estudio tiene como objetivo revelar el efecto de la ileostomía en asa sobre la función renal comparada con la colostomía en asa después de una cirugía rectal con preservación de esfínteres.DISEÑO:Estudio de análisis retrospectivo. Comparamos los valores de nitrógeno ureico en sangre en el pre-operatorio y el post-operatorio, la creatinina sérica y la tasa estimada de filtración glomerular.AJUSTES:Estudio lleavado a cabo en una sola institución académica en Osaka, Japón.PACIENTES:Desde octubre de 2013 hasta noviembre de 2021, se incluyeron consecutivamente 135 pacientes sometidos a cirugía rectal con ostomía de derivación.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las diferencias en los valores de la función renal pre y post-operatorias según el sitio de creación de las ostomía en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica pre-operatoria. También los factores de riesgo para pacientes con enfermedad renal reciente después de la creación de una ostomía.RESULTADOS:En los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica pre-operatoria (+), las diferencias entre los valores pre y post en el nitrógeno ureico en sangre (p = 0,047) y los valores de creatinina sérica (p = 0,028) fueron mayores que en los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica pre-operatoria (+) y los pacientes con enfermedad renal (-).En los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (+) pre-operatoria, la ileostomía se asoció significativamente con una elevación del valor de creatinina sérica (p = 0,025) y una disminución en el valor estimado de la tasa de filtración glomerular (p = 0,041) con respecto al valor pre-operatorio en comparación con el de la colostomía.En el análisis multivariado, la ileostomía (Odds Ratio; 7,443, p = 0,011) y la hipertensión (4,226, P = 0,008) fueron factores de riesgo independientes de nueva enfermedad renal en el post-operatorio.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de nuestro estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva y el sesgo debido a que cada cirujano determina el sitio de la confección ostomial.CONCLUSIÓN:Se debe tener cuidado en elegir el tipo de ostomía derivativa especialmente en pacientes con riesgo de disfunción renal. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Postoperative Oral Rehydration and Regimented Follow-up Decrease Readmissions After Colorectal Surgery That Includes Ileostomies

BACKGROUND

Ileostomies constitute 15% to 43% of readmissions after colorectal surgery, often due to dehydration and acute kidney injury. Prior institutional interventions decreased readmissions but not among patients who underwent new ileostomies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate readmissions among patients who underwent new ileostomies after postoperative oral rehydration solution and standardized clinic visits.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospective database.

SETTINGS

Enhanced recovery colorectal surgery service.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent new ileostomy before and after intervention.

INTERVENTIONS

Postoperative oral rehydration solution and postdischarge clinic visits with review of inputs/outputs, antimotility and appliance needs, and trained nurse reeducation 4 to 7 days after discharge, 30 days postoperatively, and every 1 to 2 weeks thereafter as needed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Readmission rate due to dehydration/acute kidney injury (primary), emergency department visits, and readmission rates overall and for specific diagnoses. Analysis used univariate and weighted techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients (199 preintervention; 113 postintervention) were included, with a mean age of 59.0 years. Patients were predominantly White (94.9%) and evenly split between men and women. The most common diagnosis was diverticulitis (43.3%). The most common procedure was high anterior resection (38.8%), followed by low anterior resection (16.35%). Patient and procedure characteristics were well matched between groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that readmission rate due to dehydration/acute kidney injury significantly decreased between pre- and postintervention study groups (45.7% vs 16.5%, p = 0.039). Emergency department visits due to dehydration/acute kidney injury (12.0% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001) and readmissions from all causes (24.33% vs 10.6%, p = 0.005) also significantly decreased. Other complications were not significantly different between groups. Average stoma output 24 hours before (776 vs 625 mL, p = 0.005) and after (993 vs 890 mL, p = 0.025) discharge was significantly decreased in the postintervention group.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

An oral rehydration solution and frequent standardized postdischarge visits led by trained nursing staff decreased readmissions and emergency department visits among patients who underwent new ileostomies after colorectal surgery. See Video Abstract .

LA REHIDRATACIN ORAL POSOPERATORIA Y EL SEGUIMIENTO REGLAMENTADO REDUCEN LOS REINGRESOS EN PACIENTES DE CIRUGA COLORRECTAL CON ILEOSTOMAS

ANTECEDENTES:Las ileostomías constituyen del 15 al 43% de los reingresos después de la cirugía colorrectal, a menudo debido a la deshidratación y la lesión renal aguda. Las intervenciones institucionales previas redujeron los reingresos, pero no entre los pacientes con nuevas ileostomías.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los reingresos entre pacientes con nuevas ileostomías después del uso de solución de rehidratación oral postoperatoria y visitas clínicas estandarizadas.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTES:Servicio de cirugía colorrectal de recuperación mejorada.PACIENTES:Pacientes con ileostomía nueva antes y después de la intervención.INTERVENCIÓN(ES):Solución de rehidratación oral posoperatoria y visitas clínicas posteriores al alta con revisión de entradas/salidas, antimotilidad y necesidades de aparatos, y reeducación de enfermeras capacitadas 4-7 días después del alta, 30 días después de la operación y cada 1-2 semanas después, según sea necesario.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasa de readmisión debido a deshidratación/lesión renal aguda (primaria), tasa de urgencias y de readmisión en general y para diagnósticos específicos. El análisis utilizó técnicas univariadas y ponderadas.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 312 pacientes (199 preintervención; 113 postintervención), con una edad media de 59,0 años. Los pacientes eran predominantemente blancos (94,9%) y se dividieron equitativamente entre hombres y mujeres. El diagnóstico más frecuente fue diverticulitis (43,3%). El procedimiento más común fue la resección anterior alta (38,8 %) seguida de la resección anterior baja (16,35 %). Las características del paciente y del procedimiento coincidieron bien entre los grupos. El análisis multivariante demostró que la tasa de reingreso debido a deshidratación/lesión renal aguda disminuyó significativamente entre los grupos de estudio antes y después de la intervención (45,7 % frente a 16,5 %, p = 0,039). Las visitas a urgencias por deshidratación/insuficiencia renal aguda (12,0 % frente a 1,7 %, p < 0,001) y los reingresos por todas las causas (24,33 % frente a 10,6 %, p = 0,005) también disminuyeron significativamente. Otras complicaciones no fueron significativamente diferentes entre los grupos. El gasto medio del estoma 24 horas antes (776 ml frente a 625 ml, p = 0,005) y después (993 ml frente a 890 ml, p = 0,025) del alta disminuyó significativamente en el grupo posterior a la intervención.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo de centro único.CONCLUSIONES:Una solución de rehidratación oral y frecuentes visitas estandarizadas posteriores al alta dirigidas por personal de enfermería capacitado redujeron los reingresos y las visitas al servicio de urgencias entre los pacientes con nuevas ileostomías después de la cirugía colorrectal. ( Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

When developing a clinical prediction model, assuming a linear relationship between the continuous predictors and outcome is not recommended. Incorrect specification of the functional form of continuous predictors could reduce predictive accuracy. We examine how continuous predictors are handled in studies developing a clinical prediction model.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for clinical prediction model studies developing a logistic regression model for a binary outcome, published between July 01, 2020, and July 30, 2020.

RESULTS

In total, 118 studies were included in the review (18 studies (15%) assessed the linearity assumption or used methods to handle nonlinearity, and 100 studies (85%) did not). Transformation and splines were commonly used to handle nonlinearity, used in 7 (n = 7/18, 39%) and 6 (n = 6/18, 33%) studies, respectively. Categorization was most often used method to handle continuous predictors (n = 67/118, 56.8%) where most studies used dichotomization (n = 40/67, 60%). Only ten models included nonlinear terms in the final model (n = 10/18, 56%).

CONCLUSION

Though widely recommended not to categorize continuous predictors or assume a linear relationship between outcome and continuous predictors, most studies categorize continuous predictors, few studies assess the linearity assumption, and even fewer use methodology to account for nonlinearity. Methodological guidance is provided to guide researchers on how to handle continuous predictors when developing a clinical prediction model.

Predicting Colorectal Surgery Readmission Risk: a Surgery-Specific Predictive Model

Most current predictive models for risk of readmission were primarily designed from non-surgical patients and often utilize administrative data alone. Models built upon comprehensive data sources specific to colorectal surgery may be key to implementing interventions aimed at reducing readmissions. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for risk of 30-day readmission specific to colorectal surgery patients including administrative, clinical, laboratory, and socioeconomic status (SES) data. Patients admitted to the colorectal surgery service who underwent surgery and were discharged from an academic tertiary hospital between 2017 and 2019 were included. A total of 1549 patients met eligibility criteria for this retrospective split-sample cohort study. The 30-day readmission rate of the cohort was 19.62%. A multivariable logistic regression was developed (C=0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.73), which outperformed two internationally used readmission risk prediction indices (C=0.58, 95% CI 0.52-0.65) and (C=0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.66). Tailored surgery-specific readmission models with comprehensive data sources outperform the most used readmission indices in predicting 30-day readmission in colorectal surgery patients. Model performance is improved by using more comprehensive datasets that include administrative and socioeconomic details about a patient, as well as clinical information used for decision-making around the time of discharge.

Readmission with acute kidney injury following ileostomy: patterns and predictors of a common phenomenon

PURPOSE

Ileostomy is associated with various complications, often necessitating rehospitalization. High-output ileostomy is common and may lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). Here we describe the temporal pattern of readmission with AKI following ileostomy formation and identify risk factors.

METHODS

Patients that underwent formation of ileostomy between 2008 and 2021 were included in this study. Readmission with AKI with high output ileostomy was defined as readmission with serum creatinine > 1.5-fold compared to the level at discharge or latest baseline (at least stage-1 AKI according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) criteria), accompanied by ileostomy output > 1000 ml in 24 h. Patient characteristics and perioperative course were assessed to identify predictors for readmission with AKI.

RESULTS

Of 1191 patients who underwent ileostomy, 198 (16.6%) were readmitted with a high output stoma and AKI. The mean time to readmission with AKI was 98.97 ± 156.36 days. Eighty-six patients (43.4%) had early readmission (within 30 days), and 66 (33%) were readmitted after more than 90 days. Over 90% of patients had more than one readmission, and 110 patients (55%) had 5 or more. Patient-related predictors for readmission with AKI were age > 65, body mass index > 30 kg/m2, and hypertension. Factors related to the postoperative course were AKI with creatinine > 2 mg/dl, postoperative hemoglobin < 8 g/dl or blood transfusion, albumin < 20 g/dl, high output stoma and need for loperamide, and length of hospital stay > 20 days. Factors related to early versus late readmissions and multiple readmissions were also analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission with AKI following ileostomy formation is a consequential event with distinct risk factors. Acknowledging these risk factors is the foundation for designing interventions aiming to reduce frequency of AKI readmissions in predisposed patient populations.

Noninvasive Venous Waveform Analysis Correlates With Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure and Predicts 30-Day Admission in Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Right Heart Catheterization

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in the elderly and readmission is common. Clinical indicators of congestion may not precede acute congestion with enough time to prevent hospital admission for heart failure. Thus, there is a large and unmet need for accurate, noninvasive assessment of congestion. Noninvasive venous waveform analysis in heart failure (NIVAHF) is a novel, noninvasive technology that monitors intravascular volume status and hemodynamic congestion. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation of NIVAHF with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and the ability of NIVAHF to predict 30-day admission after right heart catheterization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The prototype NIVAHF device was compared with the PCWP in 106 patients undergoing right heart catheterization. The NIVAHF algorithm was developed and trained to estimate the PCWP. NIVA scores and central hemodynamic parameters (PCWP, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, and cardiac output) were evaluated in 84 patients undergoing outpatient right heart catheterization. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine whether a NIVA score predicted 30-day hospital admission. The NIVA score demonstrated a positive correlation with PCWP (r = 0.92, n = 106, P < .0001). The NIVA score at the time of hospital discharge predicted 30-day admission with an AUC of 0.84, a NIVA score of more than 18 predicted admission with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 56%. Residual analysis suggested that no single patient demographic confounded the predictive accuracy of the NIVA score.

CONCLUSIONS

The NIVAHF score is a noninvasive monitoring technology that is designed to provide an estimate of PCWP. A NIVA score of more than 18 indicated an increased risk for 30-day hospital admission. This noninvasive measurement has the potential for guiding decongestive therapy and the prevention of hospital admission in patients with heart failure.

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Readmission After Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Readmission after colorectal surgery is common and often implies complications for patients and costs for hospitals. Previous works have created predictive models using logistic regression for this outcome but have shown limited accuracy. Machine learning has shown promise in improving predictions by identifying non-linear patterns in data. We sought to create a more accurate predictive model for readmission after colorectal surgery using machine learning.

METHODS

Patients who underwent colorectal surgery were identified in the National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database including years 2012-2019 and split into training, validation, and test sets. The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days of surgery. Three types of machine learning models were created, including random forest (RF), gradient boosting (XGB), and neural network (NN). A logistic regression (LR) model was also created for comparison. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

The dataset included 213,827 patients after application of exclusion criteria. A total of 23,083 (10.8%) of patients experienced readmission. NN obtained an AUROC of 0.751 (95% CI 0.743-0.759), compared with 0.684 (95% CI 0.676-0.693) for LR. RF and XGB performed similarly with AUROCs of 0.749 (95% CI 0.741-0.757) and 0.745 (95% CI 0.737-0.753) respectively. Ileus, index admission length of stay, organ-space surgical site infection present at time of surgery, and ostomy placement were identified as the most contributory variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning approaches outperformed traditional statistical methods in the prediction of readmission after colorectal surgery. After external validation, this improved prediction model could be used to target interventions to reduce readmission rate.

Overall readmissions and readmissions related to dehydration after creation of an ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hospital readmissions after creation of an ileostomy are common and come with a high clinical and financial burden. The aim of this review with pooled analysis was to determine the incidence of dehydration-related and all-cause readmissions after formation of an ileostomy, and the associated costs.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting on dehydration-related and overall readmission rates after formation of a loop or end ileostomy between January 1990 and April 2021. Analyses were performed using R Statistical Software Version 3.6.1.

Results

The search yielded 71 studies (n = 82,451 patients). The pooled incidence of readmissions due to dehydration was 6% (95% CI 0.04–0.09) within 30 days, with an all-cause readmission rate of 20% (CI 95% 0.18–0.23). Duration of readmissions for dehydration ranged from 2.5 to 9 days. Average costs of dehydration-related readmission were between $2750 and $5924 per patient. Other indications for readmission within 30 days were specified in 15 studies, with a pooled incidence of 5% (95% CI 0.02–0.14) for dehydration, 4% (95% CI 0.02–0.08) for stoma outlet problems, and 4% (95% CI 0.02–0.09) for infections.

Conclusions

One in five patients are readmitted with a stoma-related complication within 30 days of creation of an ileostomy. Dehydration is the leading cause for these readmissions, occurring in 6% of all patients within 30 days. This comes with high health care cost for a potentially avoidable cause. Better monitoring, patient awareness and preventive measures are required.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-022-02580-6.

Risk and consequences of dehydration following colorectal cancer resection with diverting ileostomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

This systematic review aims to assess dehydration prevalence and dehydration-related morbidity from diverting ileostomy compared to resections without ileostomy formation in adults undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.

METHOD

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies of any design that reported dehydration, renal function and dehydration-related morbidity in adult colorectal cancer patients with diverting ileostomy (last search 12 August 2020). Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.

RESULTS

Of 1927 screened papers, 22 studies were included (21 cohort studies and one randomized trial) with a total of 19 485 patients (12 209 with ileostomy). The prevalence of dehydration was 9.00% (95% CI 5.31-13.45, P < 0.001). The relative risk of dehydration following diverting ileostomy was 3.37 (95% CI 2.30-4.95, P < 0.001). Three studies assessing long-term trends in renal function demonstrated progressive renal impairment persisting beyond the initial insult. Consequences identified included unplanned readmission, delay or non-commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy, and development of chronic kidney disease.

DISCUSSION

Significant dehydration is common following diverting ileostomy; it is linked to acute kidney injury and has a long-term impact on renal function. This study suggests that ileostomy confers significant morbidity particularly related to dehydration and renal impairment.

Risk factors for readmission with dehydration after ileostomy formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Ileostomy formation is a commonly performed procedure with substantial associated morbidity. Patients with an ileostomy experience high rates of unplanned hospital readmission with dehydration, and such events have a long-term health and economic impact. Reports of the significant risk factors associated with these readmissions have been inconsistent. This study aimed to identify the significant risk factors for readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL databases. All original research articles reporting risk factors for readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation in adults were included. The primary outcome was the pooled risk ratio of clinically relevant variables potentially associated with dehydration-related readmission following ileostomy formation. The secondary outcome was the incidence of dehydration-related readmission.

RESULTS

Ten studies (27 089 patients) were included. The incidences of 30- and 60-day readmission with dehydration were 5.0% (range 2.1%-13.2%) and 10.3% (range 7.3%-14.1%), respectively. Eight variables were found to be significantly associated with dehydration-related readmission: age ≥65 years, body mass index ≥30 kg/m² , diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal comorbidity, regular diuretic use, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure and length of stay after index admission. A preoperative diagnosis of colorectal cancer was less likely to result in readmission with dehydration.

CONCLUSION

Readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation is a significant issue with several risk factors. Awareness of these risk factors will help inform the design of future studies addressing risk prediction, allow risk stratification of ileostomates and aid in the development of personalized prevention strategies.

Loop ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: factors predicting reversal and stoma related morbidity

PURPOSE

Loop ileostomy is performed in rectal cancer surgery to decrease the impact of anastomotic leak but it is associated with a significant complication rate. This study aimed to analyze the morbidity related to diverting ileostomy and to identify factors predictive of complications related to stoma management and reversal, as well as conversion into a permanent ileostomy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 112 patients submitted to oncological rectal resection and defunctioning ileostomy in a Portuguese colorectal unit between March 2012 and March 2019.

RESULTS

Loop ileostomy was responsible for 13% of index surgery morbidity and 15% of patients' readmissions due to high output, stoma stenosis and parastomal hernia. Ileostomy was reversed in 89% cases with 7% Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb complications. An association was established between diabetes and higher stoma management morbidity (OR: 3.28 [95% CI: 1.039-10.426]. p = 0.041). Likewise, diabetes (OR: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.038; 6.90], p=0.015), oncological disease stage ≥ III (OR: 0.10 [95% CI: 0.005; 0.656], p=0.047) and index rectal surgery morbidity (OR: 0.23 [95% CI: 0.052; 0.955], p=0.041) were associated with less ileostomy closure. Complications of the index surgery also related to higher stoma reversal morbidity (OR: 5.11 [95% CI: 1.665; 16.346], p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes and complications of index rectal surgery were identified as predictive of ileostomy morbidity, closure rate and associated complications. It is essential to adjust treatment decisions to patient's morbidity risk and adopt a more selective approach concerning the use of an ileostomy.

The association of age with decline in renal function after low anterior resection and loop ileostomy for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort prognostic factor study

BACKGROUND

Low anterior resection (LAR) is often performed with diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) for anastomotic protection in patients with rectal cancer. We aim to analyze, if older patients are more prone to a decline in kidney function following creation and closure of DLI after LAR for rectal carcinoma versus younger patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study from a database including 151 patients undergoing LAR for rectal carcinoma with DLI was used. Patients were divided in two age groups (Group A: <65 years, n = 79; Group B: ≥65 years, n = 72). For 123 patients undergoing DLI reversal prognostic factors for an impairment of serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 3 months after DLI reversal was analyzed using a multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

SCr before LAR(T₀) was significant higher in Group B (P = 0.04). Accordingly, the eGFR at T₀ in group B was significantly lower (P < 0.001). No patients need to undergo hemodialysis after LAR or DLI reversal. Age and SCr at T₀were able to statistically significant predict an increase in SCr (P<0.001) and eGFR (P=0.001) three months after DLI reversal (The R² for the overall model was .82 (adjusted R² = .68).

CONCLUSION

DLI creation may result in a reduction of eGFR in older patients 3 months after DLI closure. Apart from this, patients do not have a higher morbidity after creation and closure of DLI resulting from LAR regardless of their age.

Re-admissions after ileostomy formation: a retrospective analysis from a New Zealand tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

Ileostomy formation is a commonly performed procedure in colorectal surgery. The morbidity associated with ileostomies is substantial, particularly for unplanned hospital re-admissions and re-admissions with dehydration. Studies of post-ileostomy re-admissions from an Australasian institution are currently lacking. This retrospective study aimed to quantify the 60-day re-admission rate after ileostomy formation in a New Zealand tertiary centre and to determine the predictive factors.

METHODS

The surgical database of Auckland City Hospital was searched for all patients aged ≥18 years with a new ileostomy formed between first January 2015 and first January 2019. Patient electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain data regarding the primary outcome of re-admissions within 60 days of discharge, as well as patient and operative variables. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of all-cause re-admissions and re-admissions with dehydration.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients with 266 ileostomy formations were included. The 60-day re-admission rate was 29.3%, with dehydration present in 27.0% of these re-admissions. Renal impairment at discharge (odds ratio 2.819, 95% confidence interval 1.087-7.310) and the presence of at least one Clavien-Dindo 1 complication (odds ratio 2.268, 95% confidence interval 1.301-3.954) were independently associated with all-cause re-admission. The independent predictors of re-admission with dehydration were renal impairment at discharge, codeine prescribed on discharge, Charlson Comorbidity Index and body mass index.

CONCLUSION

Unplanned hospital re-admission following ileostomy formation is a significant issue in the New Zealand patient population. Some patient groups are at particularly high risk, such as those with renal impairment at discharge.