1
|
Almpanidou S, Vachliotis ID, Goulas A, Polyzos SA. The potential role of adipokines and hepatokines in age-related ocular diseases. Metabol Open 2025; 26:100365. [PMID: 40330313 PMCID: PMC12053655 DOI: 10.1016/j.metop.2025.100365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2025] [Accepted: 04/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025] Open
Abstract
Age-related ocular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), cataract and glaucoma may lead to visual impairment and even to blindness. Metabolic diseases, such as obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) have emerged as potential risk factors of age-related ocular diseases, especially DR. Visceral adiposity has been associated with increased risk of DR and AMD in most clinical studies, although body mass index has to-date provided conflicting association with DR and AMD. In addition, obesity is recognized as a risk factor of cataract and glaucoma. Similarly to obesity, MASLD appears to be associated with DR in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, but probably not in those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A potential positive association between MASLD and AMD, glaucoma and cataract is supported by limited evidence to-date, thus needing further investigation. Altered secretion patterns of adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, lipocalin-2, resistin) and hepatokines [adropin, fetuin-A, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21, retinol binding protein (RBP)-4] seem to disrupt ocular homeostasis and contribute to the development of age-related ocular diseases in the context of obesity and MASLD. In this regard, novel adipokine-based and hepatokine-based therapies may be added to the treatment options for ocular diseases in the future. This narrative review aimed to summarize evidence on the interconnection of obesity and MASLD with age-related ocular diseases, with a specific focus on the roles of adipokines and hepatokines as mediators of these potential associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavroula Almpanidou
- First Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ilias D. Vachliotis
- First Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Antonis Goulas
- First Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stergios A. Polyzos
- First Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Idris I, Anyiam O. The latest evidence and guidance in lifestyle and surgical interventions to achieve weight loss in people with overweight or obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab 2025; 27 Suppl 2:20-34. [PMID: 40026042 PMCID: PMC12000859 DOI: 10.1111/dom.16296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2025] [Accepted: 02/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of obesity and related co-morbidities has reached epidemic proportions. Effective evidence-based treatment approaches are therefore important. Lifestyle intervention remains the mainstay of the treatment strategy to manage obesity. Increased evidence has also emerged regarding the efficacy of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) to induce significant and sustained weight loss while also reducing the progression of obesity-related co-morbidities for people living with obesity. AIMS & METHODS This article aims to bring together current evidence, guidance and best practice for the prevention and management of people living with overweight or obesity by means of lifestyle and behavioural intervention, as well as by MBS. RESULT Lifestyle intervention encompasses dietary strategies, physical activity and behavioural intervention. Discussion on MBS will focus on current indications, comparison between different MBS procedures, novel endoscopic techniques, potential complications and pre-operative management. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY The number of people living with excess weight and complications associated with being overweight is alarmingly quite high. Effective treatment approaches that are supported by clinical studies are therefore important. Lifestyle changes remain very important to manage excess weight. Increased evidence has also shown the benefits of weight loss surgery to produce significant weight loss which could be sustained, while also reducing the risk of developing medical conditions associated with excess weight. This article aims to bring together current evidence, guidance and best practice for the prevention and management of people living with excess weight by means of lifestyle and behavioural changes, as well as by weight loss surgery. Lifestyle intervention encompasses dietary strategies, physical activity and behavioural intervention. Discussion on weight loss surgery will focus on current criteria for suitability, comparison between different weight loss surgery procedures, new techniques, possible complications and appropriate management prior to weight loss surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iskandar Idris
- Centre of Metabolism Ageing & Physiology, School of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- East Midlands Bariatric Metabolic Institute (EMBMI)University Hospitals Derby & Burton Foundation TrustDerbyUK
| | - Oluwaseun Anyiam
- Centre of Metabolism Ageing & Physiology, School of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- East Midlands Bariatric Metabolic Institute (EMBMI)University Hospitals Derby & Burton Foundation TrustDerbyUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chapela S, Alvarez-Córdova L, Martinuzzi A, Suarez R, Gonzalez V, Manrique E, Castaño J, Rossetti G, Cobellis L, Pilone V, Frias-Toral E, Schiavo L. Neurobiological and Microbiota Alterations After Bariatric Surgery: Implications for Hunger, Appetite, Taste, and Long-Term Metabolic Health. Brain Sci 2025; 15:363. [PMID: 40309850 PMCID: PMC12025976 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15040363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2025] [Revised: 03/27/2025] [Accepted: 03/28/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective intervention for obesity, inducing significant neurobiological and gut microbiota changes that influence hunger, appetite, taste perception, and long-term metabolic health. This narrative review examines these alterations by analyzing recent findings from clinical and preclinical studies, including neuroimaging, microbiome sequencing, and hormonal assessments. BS modulates appetite-regulating hormones, reducing ghrelin while increasing glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY), leading to enhanced satiety and decreased caloric intake. Neuroimaging studies reveal structural and functional changes in brain regions involved in reward processing and cognitive control, contributing to reduced cravings and altered food choices. Additionally, BS reshapes the gut microbiota, increasing beneficial species such as Akkermansia muciniphila, which influence metabolic pathways through short-chain fatty acid production and bile acid metabolism. These findings highlight the complex interplay between the gut and the brain in post-surgical metabolic regulation. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for optimizing post-operative care, including nutritional strategies and behavioral interventions. Future research should explore how these changes impact long-term outcomes, guiding the development of targeted therapies to enhance the recovery and quality of life for BS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastián Chapela
- Departamento de Bioquímica Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1121ABG, Argentina;
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina
| | - Ludwig Alvarez-Córdova
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de las Américas (UDLA), Quito 170513, Ecuador
| | - Andres Martinuzzi
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Sanatorio Rio Negro, Rio Negro R8500BAD, Argentina;
- Asuntos Profesionales y Educación, Fresenius Kabi Argentina, Ciudad de Buenos Aires C1428AAU, Argentina
| | - Rosario Suarez
- School of Medicine, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Calle París, San Cayetano Alto, Loja 110107, Ecuador;
| | - Victoria Gonzalez
- Unidad de Soporte Metabólico y Nutricional, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba X5000BFB, Argentina;
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000IYG, Argentina
| | - Ezequiel Manrique
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba X5016KEH, Argentina;
| | - Janeth Castaño
- Pediatrics, Family Medicine Department, Indiana University Health, Lafayette, IN 47905, USA;
| | - Gianluca Rossetti
- General and Bariatric Surgery Unit, Abano Terme Policlinic, 35031 Padova, Italy;
| | - Luigi Cobellis
- Unit of General Surgery, Casa Di Cura “Prof. Dott. Luigi Cobellis”, 84078 Vallo Della Lucania, Italy;
| | - Vincenzo Pilone
- Public Health Department, Naples “Federico II” University, AOU “Federico II”, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Evelyn Frias-Toral
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón 0901952, Ecuador;
- Division of Research, Texas State University, 601 University Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
| | - Luigi Schiavo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
- NBFC—National Biodiversity Future Center, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frias-Toral E, Chapela S, Gonzalez V, Martinuzzi A, Locatelli J, Llobera N, Manrique E, Sarno G, Mingo M, Marchese F, Cuomo R, Romaniello L, Perna M, Giordano A, Santella B, Schiavo L. Optimizing Nutritional Management Before and After Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Guide for Sustained Weight Loss and Metabolic Health. Nutrients 2025; 17:688. [PMID: 40005017 PMCID: PMC11858815 DOI: 10.3390/nu17040688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2025] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Obesity is associated with multiple comorbidities that contribute to increased mortality among affected individuals. There are multiple treatments for this condition, including nutritional interventions, pharmacological therapies, and surgical procedures. Within these, bariatric surgery is an effective treatment option that requires a multidisciplinary approach, both before and after surgery. Nutritional management prior to surgery aims to achieve metabolic control and reduce comorbidities associated with the procedure. Postoperative nutritional management focuses on preventing complications, ensuring adequate nourishment, and providing necessary supplementation for optimal recovery and long-term success. This narrative review examines all these critical aspects of nutritional management in bariatric surgery, including preoperative nutrition, postoperative nutrition and physical activity recommendation, different nutritional aspects according to the type of bariatric surgery, and future directions for investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Frias-Toral
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón 0901952, Ecuador;
| | - Sebastián Chapela
- Departamento de Bioquímica Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1121ABG, Argentina;
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina;
| | - Victoria Gonzalez
- Unidad de Soporte Metabólico y Nutricional, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba X5000BFB, Argentina;
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba X5000IYG, Argentina
| | - Andres Martinuzzi
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Sanatorio Rio Negro, Rio Negro R8500BAD, Argentina;
- Asuntos Profesionales y Educación, Fresenius Kabi Argentina, Ciudad de Buenos Aires C1428AAU, Argentina
| | - Julieta Locatelli
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1426ANZ, Argentina;
| | - Natalia Llobera
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1280AEB, Argentina;
| | - Ezequiel Manrique
- Unidad de Soporte Nutricional, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba X5016KEH, Argentina;
- Nutrihome S.A., Ciudad de Buenos Aires C1428AAI, Argentina
| | - Gerardo Sarno
- Scuola Medica Salernitana, “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona” University Hospital, 84131 Salerno, Italy;
| | - Monica Mingo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
| | - Federica Marchese
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
| | - Raffaele Cuomo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
| | - Ludovica Romaniello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
| | - Martina Perna
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
| | - Annalisa Giordano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
| | - Biagio Santella
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Luigi Schiavo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy; (M.M.); (F.M.); (R.C.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.); (B.S.)
- National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Laan L, Sizoo D, de Heide LJM, van Beek AP, Emous M. Fewer patients with insufficient weight loss after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after 5 years of follow-up. Clin Obes 2024:e12728. [PMID: 39692161 DOI: 10.1111/cob.12728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to give a comprehensive overview of the one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during 5 years of follow-up in terms of weight loss, the remission of obesity-associated diseases and complications. We performed a retrospective cohort study, with a 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) comparison between all adult patients who underwent a primary OAGB or RYGB in 2016. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m2 were excluded. In total, 372 patients underwent OAGB and 113 patients RYGB. After performing a 1:1 PSM, we obtained two nearly identical cohorts of 113 patients. After OAGB, the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly higher during 5 years of follow-up. Also, more patients after OAGB had a successful weight loss (TWL > 20%) after 5 years (86% vs. 72%; p = .019). The remission of obesity-associated diseases and short-term complications did not differ between both procedures. Persistent reflux was the reason for conversion to RYGB in 11.3% of the patients after OAGB. More internal herniations were seen after RYGB (10.4% vs. 1.9%; p = .010). Overall, the proportion of patients with major mid-term complications did not differ between both procedures. In conclusion, OAGB resulted in more weight reduction and especially fewer patients with insufficient weight loss during 5 years of follow-up, while remission of obesity-associated diseases remained the same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsy van der Laan
- Department of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Centre for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dionne Sizoo
- Department of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Centre for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Loek J M de Heide
- Department of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Centre for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - André P van Beek
- Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes Emous
- Department of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Centre for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Petrucciani N, Carrano FM, Barone SC, Goglia M, Iadicicco E, Distefano G, Mucaj L, Stefanelli S, D'Angelo F, Aurello P, Silecchia G. Primary, revisional, and endoscopic bariatric surgery: a narrative review of abdominal emergency management for general surgeons. Minerva Surg 2024; 79:629-647. [PMID: 39932466 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.24.10536-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2025]
Abstract
Minimally invasive approaches like endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery have revolutionized bariatric and metabolic surgery (MBS). Despite the safety of MBS in specialized centers, acute complications requiring emergency treatment may occur and present challenges for general surgeons, especially in community hospitals. This is further complicated by the rising popularity of bariatric surgery tourism and the increasing diversity of bariatric surgical techniques. This paper provides an updated review of the management of acute abdominal complications after minimally invasive MBS, intending to guide general surgeons in managing these patients, especially in emergency settings where specialized bariatric care may not be readily available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niccolò Petrucciani
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco M Carrano
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy -
| | - Sara C Barone
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Goglia
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Erika Iadicicco
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Distefano
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonida Mucaj
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Stefanelli
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco D'Angelo
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Aurello
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee Y, Hircock C, Dang J, Jung J, Zevin B, Elnahas A, Khamar J, Vergis A, Tahir U, Hardy K, Samarasinghe Y, Gill R, Gu J, McKechnie T, Pescarus R, Biertho L, Lam E, Neville A, Ellsmere J, Karmali S, Jackson T, Okrainec A, Doumouras A, Kroh M, Hong D. Assessment of guidelines for bariatric and metabolic surgery: a systematic review and evaluation using appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II (AGREE II). Int J Obes (Lond) 2024; 48:1193-1204. [PMID: 38890403 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-024-01559-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, multiple guidelines on bariatric and metabolic surgery were published, however, their quality remains unknown, leaving providers with uncertainty when using them to make perioperative decisions. This study aims to evaluate the quality of existing guidelines for perioperative bariatric surgery care. METHODS A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE were conducted from January 2010 to October 2022 for bariatric clinical practice guidelines. Guideline evaluation was carried out using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) framework. RESULTS The initial search yielded 1483 citations, of which, 26 were included in final analysis. The overall median domain scores for guidelines were: (1) scope and purpose: 87.5% (IQR: 57-94%), (2) stakeholder involvement: 49% (IQR: 40-64%), (3) rigor of development: 42.5% (IQR: 22-68%), (4) clarity of presentation: 85% (IQR: 81-90%), (5) applicability: 6% (IQR: 3-16%), (6) editorial independence: 50% (IQR: 48-67%), (7) overall impressions: 48% (IQR: 33-67%). Only six guidelines achieved an overall score >70%. CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery guidelines effectively outlined their aim and presented recommendations. However, many did not adequately seek patient input, state search criteria, use evidence rating tools, and consider resource implications. Future guidelines should reference the AGREE II framework in study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Caroline Hircock
- Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jerry Dang
- Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - James Jung
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Boris Zevin
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Ahmad Elnahas
- Division of General Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jigish Khamar
- Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ashley Vergis
- Division of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Umair Tahir
- Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Krista Hardy
- Division of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | - Richdeep Gill
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Gu
- Division of General Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Tyler McKechnie
- Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Radu Pescarus
- Division of General Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Laurent Biertho
- Department of Surgery, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Elaine Lam
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amy Neville
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - James Ellsmere
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shahzeer Karmali
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Timothy Jackson
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Okrainec
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Matthew Kroh
- Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dennis Hong
- Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
De Luca M, Belluzzi A, Salminen P, Bueter M, Pujol-Rafols J, Sakran N, Stier C, Taskin HE, Chiappetta S, Carrano FM, Di Lorenzo N, Nienhuijs S, Puy RV, Stenberg E, Emous M, Prager G, Himpens J, Felsenreich DM, Iannelli A, Parmar C, Copaescu C, Fried M, Ruiz-Úcar E, Cohen RV, Olmi S, Angrisani L, Ribeiro R, Bandini G, Scoccimarro D, Ragghianti B, Monami M. Development of the International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders-European Chapter (IFSO-EC) Grade-Based Guidelines on the Surgical Treatment of Obesity Using Multimodal Strategies: Design and Methodological Aspects. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5106. [PMID: 39274320 PMCID: PMC11396011 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2024] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of obesity is already a worldwide health concern. The development of straightforward guidelines regarding the whole available armamentarium (i.e., medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions in conjunction with a guidance program) is paramount to offering the best multimodal approach to patients with obesity. Methods: The International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders-European Chapter (IFSO-EC) identified a panel of experts to develop the present guidelines. The panel formulated a series of clinical questions (based on the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome conceptual framework), which have been voted on and approved. A GRADE methodology will be applied to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations employed to minimize selection and information biases. This approach aims to enhance the reliability and validity of recommendations, promoting greater adherence to the best available evidence. Results: These guidelines are intended for adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who are candidates for metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). The expert panel responsible for developing these guidelines comprised 25 panelists (92% were bariatric surgeons) and 3 evidence reviewers, with an average age of 50.1 ± 10.2 years. The panel focused on 3 key questions regarding the combined use of structured lifestyle interventions, approved obesity management medications, and endoscopic weight loss procedures with MBS. Conclusions: The complexity of obesity as a chronic disease requires a comprehensive knowledge of all the available and feasible therapeutic options. The IFSO-EC society felt the urgent need to develop methodologically valid guidelines to give a full picture and awareness of the possible surgical and non-surgical therapeutic strategies employed with a multimodal approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio De Luca
- Department of General, Emergency and Metabolic Surgery, Rovigo Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Amanda Belluzzi
- Department of General, Emergency and Metabolic Surgery, Rovigo Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Paulina Salminen
- Department of Surgery, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
| | - Marco Bueter
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nasser Sakran
- Department of General Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth 1601001, Israel
- The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
| | - Christine Stier
- Department of Surgery, Bariatric Endoscopy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 69167 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Halit Eren Taskin
- Department of Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, 34320 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sonja Chiappetta
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Di Lorenzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Simon Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Catharina Hospital, 5623 Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ramón Vilallonga Puy
- Endocrine-Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Unit, Vall Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Erik Stenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
| | - Marloes Emous
- Center for Obesity Northern-Netherlands (CON), Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Medical Center, 8934 Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerhard Prager
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Jacques Himpens
- Delta CHIREC Hospital (Belgian Registry), 1160 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Moritz Felsenreich
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonio Iannelli
- Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Université Côte d'Azur, 06103 Nice, France
| | - Chetan Parmar
- Department of Surgery, Whittington Hospital, University College, London N19 5NF, UK
| | - Catalin Copaescu
- Department of Surgery, Ponderas Academic Hospital, 014142 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Martin Fried
- OB Klinika-Center for Treatment of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, 1300 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Elena Ruiz-Úcar
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28942 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo V Cohen
- The Center for Obesity and Diabetes, Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz, Sao Paulo 01323-20, Brazil
| | | | - Luigi Angrisani
- Public Health Department, School of Medicine, University Federico II of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Rui Ribeiro
- Centro Multidisciplinar Do Tratamento da Obesidade, Hospital Lusíadas Amadora e Lisboa, 2724-002 Amadora, Portugal
| | - Giulia Bandini
- Diabetic Foot Unit, University of Florence and AOU-Careggi, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Scoccimarro
- Diabetic Foot Unit, University of Florence and AOU-Careggi, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetta Ragghianti
- Diabetic Foot Unit, University of Florence and AOU-Careggi, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Monami
- Diabetic Foot Unit, University of Florence and AOU-Careggi, 50121 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brown LK. Targeting Hypercapnia in Chronic Lung Disease and Obesity Hypoventilation: Benefits and Challenges. Sleep Med Clin 2024; 19:357-369. [PMID: 38692758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2024.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Hypoventilation is a complication that is not uncommon in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and calls for both medical treatment of the underlying disease and, frequently, noninvasive ventilation either during exacerbations requiring hospitalization or in a chronic state in the patient at home. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome by definition is associated with ventilatory failure and hypercapnia. It may or may not be accompanied by obstructive sleep apnea, which when detected becomes an additional target for positive airway pressure treatment. Intensive research has not completely resolved the best choice of treatment, and the simplest modality, continuous positive airway pressure, may still be entertained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee K Brown
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sand T, Grøtting A, Uglem M, Augestad N, Johnsen G, Sandvik J. Neuropathy 10-15 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for severe obesity: A community-controlled nerve conduction study. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2024; 9:130-137. [PMID: 38618240 PMCID: PMC11015066 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective We searched for long-term peripheral nerve complications 10-15 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB), using a comprehensive nerve conduction study (NCS) protocol. Methods Patients (n = 175, mean age 52.0, BMI 35.2) and 86 community-controls (mean age 56.8, BMI 27.2) had NCS of one upper and lower limb. New abnormality scores from 27 polyneuropathy-relevant (PNP27s) and four carpal tunnel syndrome-relevant NCS-measures (CTS4s) were compared between groups with non-parametric statistics. Estimated prevalences were compared by 95 % confidence limits. The clinical neurophysiologist's diagnosis was retrieved from hospital records (PNP-ncs, CTS-ncs, other). Results Abnormality score did not differ between RYGB and control groups (PNP27s: 1.9 vs 1.7, CTS4s: 0.7 vs 0.6, p > 0.29). BMI correlated weakly with CTS4s in patients (rho = 0.19, p = 0.01), and less with PNP27s (rho = 0.12, p = 0.12). Polyneuropathy (PNP-ncs) prevalence was 12 % in patients and 8 % in controls. CTS-ncs prevalence was 21 % in patients and 10 % in controls (p = 0.04). Conclusions NCS-based abnormality scores did not differ between patients 10-15 years after RYGB and community-recruited controls, neither for PNP nor CTS. Significance Long-term polyneuropathic complications from RYGB have probably been avoided by modern treatment guidelines. NCS-diagnosed CTS is common in overweight RYGB patients. RYGB-patients with significant neuropathic symptoms need clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trond Sand
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Arnstein Grøtting
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
| | - Martin Uglem
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nils Augestad
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gjermund Johnsen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, Clinic of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
| | - Jorunn Sandvik
- Department of Surgery, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Centre for Obesity Research, Clinic of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Najjari K, Fattahi MR, Bariklou A, Najafi A, Hasanzadeh A, Talebpour M, Zabihi Mahmoudabadi H, Elyasinia F. Laparoscopic gastric plication: A long-term follow-up and comparison of outcomes in severe vs. non-severe obesity. Am J Surg 2024; 228:102-106. [PMID: 37586895 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND LGGCP is a non-gastrectomy, restrictive bariatric technique. This study aims to assess its long-term efficacy. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study on LGGCP patients (2010-2019) from a single tertiary center, followed for up to 60 months. RESULTS Ninety-four patients with obesity were included in the study. The mean five-year postoperative BMI was 32.00. Excess weight loss (EWL): 30%-50% and EWL<30% occurred in 16 and 9 cases, respectively. The mean EWL was higher at 3-, 6-, and 12- months post-operation in patients with a BMI<40. Weight regain was 46.3% at the five-year follow-up. Eighty-seven patients had associated comorbidity, and 76 had improved in at least one of their comorbidities. Sixteen patients (17.0%) experienced complications. CONCLUSION LGGCP is safe and effective, with benefits in patients with BMI<40. Thus, we suggest the usage of LGGCP, especially in this group of patients, due to its less-invasive nature and acceptable cost-benefit. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khosrow Najjari
- Sina Hospital, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Fattahi
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abolfazl Bariklou
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Anahita Najafi
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Mohammad Talebpour
- Sina Hospital, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Zabihi Mahmoudabadi
- Sina Hospital, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Fezzeh Elyasinia
- Department of General Surgery, Shariati Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dayan D, Bendayan A, Nevo N, Nizri E, Lahat G, Abu-Abeid A. Comparison of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy for Revision of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: 5-Year Outcomes. Obes Surg 2023:10.1007/s11695-023-06588-1. [PMID: 37046172 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06588-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is in continuous decline due to low effectiveness and high reoperation rates. This study aims to evaluate outcomes of converting LAGB to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for insufficient weight loss or weight regain. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective comparative study, based on prospective registry database of a tertiary center (2012-2019). RESULTS In all, 276 LAGB patients were converted to OAGB (n = 125) and SG (n = 151). Body mass index (BMI) at revision was 41.3 ± 6.6 and 42.3 ± 9.6 kg/m2 (P = 0.34) in OAGB and SG patients, respectively. Time interval was longer in OAGB patients (p < 0.001). Major early complication rates were comparable (2.4% and 4%; p = 0.46). At 5-years, OAGB patients had lower BMI (31.9 vs. 34.5 kg/m2; p = 0.002), and a higher total weight loss (25.1% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.003), compared with SG patients. Resolution of type 2 diabetes was higher in OAGB patients (93.3% vs. 66.6%; p = 0.047), while resolution of hypertension was not significantly different (84.6% and 80.5%; p = 0.68). Revision due to delayed complications was required in five (4%) OAGB patients and nine (8.6%) SG patients (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION OAGB for revision after LAGB due to insufficient weight loss or weight regain is safe, and has better effectiveness in weight reduction and resolution of type 2 diabetes than SG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danit Dayan
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Division of General Surgery, Bariatric Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Anat Bendayan
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nadav Nevo
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Nizri
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Guy Lahat
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Division of General Surgery, Bariatric Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Adam Abu-Abeid
- Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- Division of General Surgery, Bariatric Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Felsenreich DM, Zach ML, Vock N, Jedamzik J, Eichelter J, Mairinger M, Gensthaler L, Nixdorf L, Richwien P, Bichler C, Kristo I, Langer FB, Prager G. Esophageal function and non-acid reflux evaluated by impedance-24 h-pH-metry, high-resolution manometry, and gastroscopy after one-anastomosis gastric bypass-outcomes of a prospective mid-term study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:3832-3841. [PMID: 36693919 PMCID: PMC10156623 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09857-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is the third most common bariatric operation for patients with obesity worldwide. One concern about OAGB is the presence of acid and non-acid reflux in a mid- and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate reflux and esophagus motility by comparing preoperative and postoperative mid-term outcomes. SETTING Cross-sectional study; University-hospital based. METHODS This study includes primary OAGB patients (preoperative gastroscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and impedance-24 h-pH-metry) operated at Medical University of Vienna before 31st December 2017. After a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.3 years, these examinations were repeated. In addition, history of weight, remission of associated medical problems (AMP), and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 21 patients were included in this study and went through all examinations. Preoperative weight was 124.4 ± 17.3 kg with a BMI of 44.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2, total weight loss after 5.1 ± 2.3 years was 34.4 ± 8.3%. In addition, remission of AMP and QOL outcomes were very satisfactory in this study. In gastroscopy, anastomositis, esophagitis, Barrett´s esophagus, and bile in the pouch were found in: 38.1%, 28.3%, 9.5%, and 42.9%. Results of HRM of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure were 28.0 ± 15.6 mmHg, which are unchanged compared to preoperative values. Nevertheless, in the impedance-24 h-pH-metry, acid exposure time and DeMeester score decreased significantly to 1.2 ± 1.2% (p = 0.004) and 7.5 ± 8.9 (p = 0.017). Further, the total number of refluxes were equal to preoperative; however, the decreased acid refluxes were replaced by non-acid refluxes. CONCLUSION This study has shown decreased rates of acid reflux and increased non-acid reflux after a mid-term outcome of primary OAGB patients. Gastroscopy showed signs of chronic irritation of the gastrojejunostomy, pouch, and distal esophagus, even in asymptomatic patients. Follow-up gastroscopies in OAGB patients after 5 years may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Felsenreich
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - M L Zach
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - N Vock
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - J Jedamzik
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - J Eichelter
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - M Mairinger
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - L Gensthaler
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - L Nixdorf
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - P Richwien
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - C Bichler
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - I Kristo
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - F B Langer
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - G Prager
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|