Endoscopic vacuum-assisted surgical closure (EVASC) of anastomotic defects after low anterior resection for rectal cancer; lessons learned

Advantages of a Point-of-care Digital Rectoscope for Colorectal Surgical Practice: A Video-supported Case Series

PURPOSE

Point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools can support timely and efficient clinical decision-making. The introduction of a POC digital rectoscope has the potential to enhance colorectal surgical practice by enabling immediate bedside endoscopic evaluation in different settings.

METHODS

This case series describes 5 cases, with video documentation illustrating the potential benefits of using a portable digital rectoscope in outpatient follow-up, inpatient postoperative care, and emergency settings.

RESULTS

In a tertiary referral center, POC rectoscopy effectively supported the detection of anastomotic leakage and rectal perforation, response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer, and facilitated follow-up after treatment for anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

POC digital rectoscopy shows promise in enhancing the diagnostic efficiency of colorectal care. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its clinical impact and cost-effectiveness for the illustrated indications.

Bedside endoscopic inspection of colorectal anastomoses in the early postoperative period: a 2-center prospective feasibility study

PURPOSE

Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery can reduce severe postoperative morbidity and ensure successful treatment. This study evaluated the feasibility of bedside endoscopic inspection of the anastomosis early postoperatively using a point-of-care digital rectoscope.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted at 2 tertiary centers. Patients who underwent minimally invasive or open sphincter-preserving surgery with creation of a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis were included. Data were collected from December 2022 to October 2023. Bedside anastomotic inspections were performed postoperative day (POD) 3 to 5 using a point-of-care digital rectoscope. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as adequate clinical assessment of the anastomosis during bedside inspection. Secondary outcomes included patient tolerability, efficacy compared to other diagnostic methods, and clinical outcomes during 90 days of follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 35 patients were included. All bedside anastomotic inspections were carried out successfully. The examination showed complete visibility of the entire anastomosis in 30 patients (85.7%), with minimal discomfort reported by 3 (8.6%). No adverse events were recorded. AL occurred in 6 patients (17.1%), with 3 cases detected during bedside inspections between POD 3 and 5. Two leaks were detected without clinical or biochemical suspicion. Three patients with negative rectoscopy between POD 3 and 5 were later diagnosed with AL: 2 by a computed tomography scan and 1 by a bedside rectoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Bedside inspection of rectal anastomoses early postoperatively is feasible and tolerable for patients. Routine anastomotic inspections can detect early AL even without clear clinical or biochemical signs.

Ileoanal pouch salvage rates with endoluminal vacuum therapy for early vs late anastomotic leaks

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leaks after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) significantly compromise patient outcomes and increase healthcare resource utilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of endoluminal vacuum therapy (EndoVac) for pouch leaks. We hypothesized that EndoVac for early compared with late leaks was associated with a higher pouch survival rate.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive pouch anastomotic leaks treated with EndoVac therapy at our institution between 2013 and 2023. Patients were stratified into early (≤30 days) and late (>30 days) leak groups. Anastomotic healing was defined as complete closure of the leak site and resolution of symptoms. Pouch failure was defined as a permanent ileostomy or pouch excision. The probability of pouch survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients with IPAA were included: median age, 34 years; 71% were males; and median body mass index, 23.46 kg/m2. The following were the diagnoses made: ulcerative colitis (n = 12) and familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 2). The median (IQR) time from pouch construction to leak was 44.5 (12-192) days; of these, 6 (43%) were early, and 8 (57%) were late. All (100%) leaks were at the anastomosis; all (100%) were diverted at the time of EndoVac therapy: 10 (71%) still diverted, and 4 (29%) rediverted. Patients underwent a median of 5.5 EndoVac changes (3-7) over a 13.5 (6-21) day period from initiation of treatment to cessation of therapy. After EndoVac therapy, healing was observed in 10 (71%) patients; 2 of whom required a minor handsewn anastomotic revision but healed completely, and 4 did not heal; 3 had pouch excision, and 1 underwent redo pouch surgery. Anastomotic healing (66.7% vs 75%, P = .7) and pouch survival (83.3% vs 75%, P = .73) were not significantly different between the early and late leak groups. The overall pouch salvage rate was 78.5%.

CONCLUSION

EndoVac therapy was effective in achieving high rates of pouch salvage and anastomotic healing in patients with ileoanal pouch leaks, irrespective of the timing of intervention postoperatively. This supports the use of EndoVac as a viable treatment option for both early and late anastomotic leaks.

Economic burden of pelvic sepsis after anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cost-of-illness analysis

AIM

Anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery remains a challenging complication, with a nonhealing rate of approximately 50% at 1 year. Pelvic sepsis may require tertiary treatment that encompasses additional admissions, extensive surgery and other types of interventions. The aim of this study is to analyse the financial burden of pelvic sepsis in a tertiary hospital.

METHOD

From 2010 until 2020, all patients referred to a tertiary centre for pelvic sepsis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer were prospectively registered and retrospectively reviewed. The cost analysis adhered to Dutch National Healthcare Institute guidelines and covered hospital-imposed medical costs from salvage surgery to the last registered intervention, adjusted for inflation and priced in euros.

RESULTS

This analysis included 126 patients, with an average total cost per patient of €31 131. Salvage surgery accounted for €21 326, with an additional €9805 for reinterventions and readmissions. Salvage surgery comprised nonrestorative surgery in 48% and restorative salvage surgery in the remaining cases. Length of hospital stay averaged 9.6 days on the general ward and 0.8 days in the intensive care unit. Common reinterventions included endoscopic vacuum sponge changes (n = 153), stoma closures (n = 59) and radiological abscess drainages (n = 51). Total costs did not differ significantly between nonrestorative surgery and restorative surgery (mean = €31 950 vs. €30 362, respectively; p = 0.893).

CONCLUSION

Treating pelvic sepsis after rectal cancer resection in a tertiary hospital carries a substantial economic burden, averaging €31 131 per patient, and this work helps to quantify the potential economic impact of innovative care to reduce anastomotic leakage.

Applications of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the lower gastrointestinal tract: Tips and tricks and a review of the literature

Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an established technique for the treatment of rectal wall defects and especially anastomotic leaks. A wide range of EVT devices, both handmade and commercially available, allow for their successful placement even in small defects and difficult localizations. Reported success rates range between 85 and 97 %, while periintervenional morbidity is low and major adverse events are very rare. EVT has proven its effectiveness in the lower gastrointestinal tract and is now considered first line treatment for pelvic anastomotic leaks. This narrative review summarizes the current literature on EVT in the lower gastrointestinal tract, focusing on its indications, technical aspects and results, and offers tips and tricks for its clinical applications.

Stoma-free survival after anastomotic leak following rectal cancer resection: worldwide cohort of 2470 patients

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer resection is unclear. This worldwide cohort study aimed to provide an overview of four treatment strategies applied.

METHODS

Patients from 216 centres and 45 countries with anastomotic leak after rectal cancer resection between 2014 and 2018 were included. Treatment was categorized as salvage surgery, faecal diversion with passive or active (vacuum) drainage, and no primary/secondary faecal diversion. The primary outcome was 1-year stoma-free survival. In addition, passive and active drainage were compared using propensity score matching (2 : 1).

RESULTS

Of 2470 evaluable patients, 388 (16.0 per cent) underwent salvage surgery, 1524 (62.0 per cent) passive drainage, 278 (11.0 per cent) active drainage, and 280 (11.0 per cent) had no faecal diversion. One-year stoma-free survival rates were 13.7, 48.3, 48.2, and 65.4 per cent respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 556 patients with passive and 278 with active drainage. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups in 1-year stoma-free survival (OR 0.95, 95 per cent c.i. 0.66 to 1.33), with a risk difference of -1.1 (95 per cent c.i. -9.0 to 7.0) per cent. After active drainage, more patients required secondary salvage surgery (OR 2.32, 1.49 to 3.59), prolonged hospital admission (an additional 6 (95 per cent c.i. 2 to 10) days), and ICU admission (OR 1.41, 1.02 to 1.94). Mean duration of leak healing did not differ significantly (an additional 12 (-28 to 52) days).

CONCLUSION

Primary salvage surgery or omission of faecal diversion likely correspond to the most severe and least severe leaks respectively. In patients with diverted leaks, stoma-free survival did not differ statistically between passive and active drainage, although the increased risk of secondary salvage surgery and ICU admission suggests residual confounding.

Assessment of the efficacy of Handmade Vacuum-Assisted Sponge Drain for Treatment of Anastomotic leakage after Low Anterior Rectal Resection

Anastomotic leakage is one of the major complications of colorectal surgery, which might lead to reoperation, increased hospital stays, further intervention and mortality. Vacuum-assisted closure by devices such as Endo-SPONGE® produced by (B-Braun Medical B.V.) is currently being used to treat leakage and fistula. In this study, we aimed to assess the handmade vacuum-assisted sponge drain for anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection. This prospective study included 22 patients who had undergone sponge drain placement to treat anastomotic leakage. All patients had anastomotic leaks or defects after left anterior rectal resection (LAR) without ileostomy. They were treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before the surgery and then subjected to rigid recto-sigmoidoscopy for 30 days following the operation. Any sign of leakage, such as perianal and pelvic pain, was immediately identified and followed up with a CT scan and another recto-sigmoidoscopy. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study, 12 men (54.5%) and 10 women (47.4%). All patients had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with an average follow-up of 22.30 ± 3.81. 75% of patients (15 cases) were successfully treated, and 17 patients (85%) underwent successful ostomy closure. Treatment failed in 5 patients (25%), including three men and two women. This study shows that handmade vacuum-assisted sponge drain is a cost-effective method of anastomotic leakage management with efficacy similar to that of Endo-SPONGE^®.