Comparative surgical outcomes of transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy in pediatric thyroid disease: 5 case reports

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach in pediatric patients has been clinically proven, and its cosmetic results have been recognized by children and their families. However, there are no reports on using transoral robotic in pediatric thyroid surgery. In this study, we report the experience of 5 cases of transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy in treating of thyroid disease in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical data of five children who underwent robotic thyroid surgery via the TOVRT in our hospital from February 2021 to April 2023, including operation time, tumor diameter, postoperative hospitalization time, and surgical complications. All five patients were operated on by the same team, and the postoperative pathological results were all follicular adenoma of thyroid. The children had a strong desire for cosmetic surgery, and their families voluntarily chose the robotic surgical system for their surgery.

RESULTS

All five patients underwent unilateral thyroid lobectomy without conversion to open surgery. All patients were female, with a mean BMI of (19.63 ± 1.79) kg/m2 and the mean age was (14.40 ± 2.33) years. The average operation time was (52.00 ± 5.10) mins, the average tumor diameter was (41.60 ± 8.41) mm, and the average postoperative hospital stay was (3.60 ± 0.49) days. There were no complications such as hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, genioglossal nerve injury, or skin necrosis.

CONCLUSION

The transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy is safe and feasible, providing a new treatment option for pediatric thyroid diseases that require surgical treatment.

Comparison of learning curves and related postoperative indicators between endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and robotic thyroidectomy (RT) yield similar perioperative outcomes. This study investigated how the learning curve (LC) affects perioperative outcomes between ET and RT, identifying factors that influence the LC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two researchers individually searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies published until February 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed study quality. A random-effects model was used to compute the odds ratio and weighted mean difference (WMD). Poisson regression comparison of the number of surgeries (N LC ) was required for ET and RT to reach the stable stage of the LC. Heterogeneity was measured using Cochran's Q. Publication bias was tested using funnel plots, and sensitivity analysis assessed findings robustness. Subgroup analysis was done by operation type and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis involved 33 studies. The drainage volume of ET was higher than that of RT (WMD=-17.56 [30.22, -4.49]). After reaching the N LC , the operation time of ET and RT was shortened (ET: WMD=28.15 [18.04-38.26]; RT: WMD=38.53 [29.20-47.86]). Other perioperative outcomes also improved to varying degrees. Notably, RT showed more refined central lymph node resection (5.67 vs. 4.71), less intraoperative bleeding (16.56 ml vs. 42.30 ml), and incidence of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (24.59 vs. 26.77). The N LC of RT was smaller than that of ET (incidence-rate ratios [IRR]=0.64 [0.57-0.72]). CUSUM analysis (ET: IRR=0.84 [0.72-0.99]; RT: IRR=0.55 [0.44-0.69]) or a smaller number of respondents (ET: IRR=0.26 [0.15-0.46]; RT: IRR=0.51 [0.41-0.63]) was associated with smaller N LC . In RT, transoral approach (IRR=2.73 [1.96-4.50]; IRR=2.48 [1.61-3.84]) and retroauricular approach (RAA) (IRR=2.13 [1.26-3.60]; IRR=1.78 [1.04-3.05]) had smaller N LC compared to bilateral axillo-breast and transaxillary approach (TAA). In ET, the N LC of RAA was smaller than that of TAA (IRR=1.61 [1.04-2.51]), breast approach (IRR=1.67 [1.06-2.64]), and subclavian approach (IRR=1.80 [1.03-3.14]).

CONCLUSIONS

Rich surgical experience can improve surgical results of ET and RT. After reaching the N LC , the perioperative outcomes of RT are better than those of ET. Study subjects, surgical approaches, and analysis methods can affect N LC .

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: Lessons learned from consecutive series of 1,000 patients

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy has gained popularity as a promising approach for thyroid surgery owing to its improved cosmetic outcomes. The objective of this retrospective study was to describe the surgical and safety outcomes of 1,000 consecutive transoral robotic thyroidectomy cases.

METHODS

1,000 consecutive patients who underwent transoral robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid disease were reviewed at a large metropolitan tertiary hospital (Seoul, Korea) between September 2012 and March 2022.

RESULTS

The study comprised 1,000 patients (815 women), with 891 cancer cases. Lobectomy was the most common procedure (89.4%), followed by total thyroidectomy (9.8%) and isthmusectomy (0.8%), and their respective mean total operative times were 173.8 ± 36.2, 236.8 ± 50.5, and 107.5 ± 19.8 minutes. An obvious learning curve was noted. The respective postoperative pain scores on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2 were 4.6 ± 1.3, 3.1 ± 0.8, and 2.5 ± 0.8. The mean postoperative hospital stay duration was 2.6 ± 0.9 days. Complications occurred in 3.6% of cases, including oral wound infection, skin flap burn, bleeding, chyle leakage, transient and permanent mental nerve injury, and transient and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Transient hypoparathyroidism occurred in 4.1% of total thyroidectomy cases. Thirty-seven patients (4.2%) underwent additional radioactive iodine therapy. The median follow-up period was 39 months, and there were no cases of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the expertise of an experienced surgeon, transoral robotic thyroidectomy results in favorable cosmetic outcomes, tolerable postoperative pain, and acceptable complication rates in carefully selected patients.

Redo Thyroidectomy: Updated Insights

The risk of post-operatory hypothyroidism and hypocalcaemia, along with recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, is lower following a less-than-total thyroidectomy; however, a previously unsuspected carcinoma or a disease progression might be detected after initial surgery, hence indicating re-intervention as mandatory (so-called "redo" surgery) with completion. This decision takes into consideration a multidisciplinary approach, but the surgical technique and the actual approach is entirely based on the skills and availability of the surgical team according to the standard protocols regarding a personalised decision. We aimed to introduce a review of the most recently published data, with respect to redo thyroid surgery. For the basis of the discussion, a novel vignette on point was introduced. This was a narrative review. We searched English-language papers according to the key search terms in different combinations such as "redo" and "thyroid", alternatively "thyroidectomy" and "thyroid surgery", across the PubMed database. Inclusion criteria were original articles. The timeframe of publication was between 1 January 2020 and 20 July 2024. Exclusion criteria were non-English papers, reviews, non-human studies, case reports or case series, exclusive data on parathyroid surgery, and cell line experiments. We identified ten studies across the five-year most recent window of PubMed searches that showed a heterogeneous spectrum of complications and applications of different surgeries with respect to redo interventions during thyroid removal (e.g., recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during surgery, other types of incision than cervicotomy, the use of parathyroid fluorescence, bleeding risk, etc.). Most studies addressing novel surgical perspectives focused on robotic-assisted re-intervention, and an expansion of this kind of studies is expected. Further studies and multifactorial models of assessment and risk prediction are necessary to decide, assess, and recommend redo interventions and the most adequate surgical techniques.

Current and Future of Robotic Surgery in Thyroid Cancer Treatment

Thyroid cancer is among the most common endocrine malignancies, necessitating effective surgical interventions. Traditional open cervicotomy has long been the standard approach for thyroidectomy. However, the advent of robotic surgery has introduced new possibilities for minimally invasive procedures with benefits in terms of cosmetic outcomes, enhanced precision, comparable complication rates, and reduced recovery time. This study mainly reviewed the most widely used and well-known robotic thyroidectomy approaches: the transaxillary approach, the bilateral axillo-breast approach, and the transoral approach. This review examines the current status and future potential of robotic surgery in thyroid cancer treatment, comparing its efficacy, safety, and outcomes with those of conventional open cervicotomy. Challenges such as a longer operative time and higher costs exist. Future directions include technological advancements, tele-surgery, single-port surgery, and the integration of artificial intelligence. Robotic surgery holds promise in optimizing patient outcomes in thyroid cancer treatment.

Feasibility and complications after transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOETVA) - a single-center first experience case series

BACKGROUND

This paper reports on the first experience after implementation of a transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOETVA) as an alternative to (partial) thyroidectomy or isthmusectomy in a single center. Feasibility, implementation and specific complications are addressed.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a TOETVA procedure in our center between November 2019 and March 2023 were included. The surgical technique was performed as described by Anuwong et al. All procedures were performed by two dedicated head- and neck surgeons.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were included. All patients underwent TOETVA surgery as planned and no conversions were needed. Observed complications were post-operative wound infections (POWI) (2/20; 10%), clinically significant seroma (1/20, 5%) and unilateral hemiparesis of the larynx (3/20; 15%). Permanent mental nerve damage was seen in 3/20 patients (15%), and 4 other patients (20%) experienced transient neuropraxia.

CONCLUSIONS

TOETVA is a feasible alternative to (partial) thyroidectomy or isthmusectomy in selected patients. Special care should be taken when placing the trocars in the oral vestibulum to prevent mental nerve damage. Experience and training are essential for implementing the TOETVA procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered to ClinicalTrials.gov.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05396703.

Comparison of postoperative pain between transoral and conventional thyroidectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The extent of postoperative pain following transoral thyroidectomy is not well-understood and remains a subject of debate. This study aims to analyze and compare postoperative pain levels between patients undergoing transoral and conventional transcervical thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A prospective evaluation on postoperative pain was conducted in 310 patients undergoing conventional thyroidectomy and 194 undergoing transoral thyroidectomy. Pain levels were evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS, ranging from 0 to 10) through preoperative and postoperative questionnaires at specified time points: 1, 3, and 6 days, and 1 and 3 months following surgery. Propensity score-matched analysis was carried out based on six covariates: sex, age, body mass index, extent of thyroidectomy, tumor size, and central neck dissection.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching based on the six covariates, 121 patient pairs were identified from each group. Within this matched cohort, postoperative pain scores significantly worsened 1 day after surgery but showed progressive recovery up to 3 months post-surgery in both groups. The transoral group exhibited higher postoperative pain scores than the conventional group from day 1 (4.43 ± 2.6 vs. 3.11 ± 2.5, p < 0.001) to day 6 (1.76 ± 1.9 vs. 1.13 ± 1.6, p = 0.016) post-surgery, with no significant difference noted at 1 month. Among transoral procedures, pain scores were significantly higher for the endoscopic approach compared to the robotic approach on days 1 (5.52 ± 2.3 vs. 4.29 ± 2.3, p = 0.028) and 3 (3.52 ± 2.5 vs. 2.64 ± 2.0, p = 0.047) post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pain was significantly higher in transoral thyroidectomy compared to conventional thyroidectomy up to 6 days post-surgery. Within the transoral group, the robotic procedure resulted in lower pain levels than the endoscopic approach during the early postoperative period.

Comparison of surgical outcomes of transoral robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA), concurrently compared with conventional transcervical thyroidectomy (CTT). A network meta-analysis, comprising 23 studies, was performed in this study. The operative time of the CTT group was significantly shorter than that of the TOETVA and TORT groups. The hospital stay of the TOETVA group was significantly longer than that of the CTT group. Rates of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and total complications were higher in association with TOETVA than with TORT. No significant differences were found between the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative pain, and other complications. Cosmetic satisfaction was significantly superior with TORT and TOETVA than with CTT. Compared with CTT, TOETVA and TORT showed superior cosmesis but no significant difference in surgical outcomes except for operative time and hospital stay.

Comparison of transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy with traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy

Transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy can really make the patient's body surface free of scar. This study aimed to compare the surgical and patient-related outcomes between the transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy and traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy. The clinical data of 120 patients underwent transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy (TOVRT) or traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy (TLCIT) were collected from May 2020 to October 2021. Propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize selection bias. All these patients were diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) through ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration prior to surgical intervention and surgical plan was tailored for each patient. An intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) detection system was used in all patients, whose RLNs were identified and protected. We performed transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy with three intraoral incisions. Additional right axillary fold incisions were adopted occasionally to enhance fine reverse traction of tissue for radical tumor dissection. Clinical data including gender, age, tumor size, BMI, operation time, postoperative drainage volume and time, pain score, postoperative length of stay (LOS),number of lymph nodes removed, complications, and medical expense were observed and analyzed. Propensity score matching was used for 1:1 matching between the TOVRT group and the TLCIT group. All these patients accepted total thyroidectomy(or lobectomy) plus central lymph node dissection and all suffered from PTC confirmed by postoperative pathology. No conversion to open surgery happened in TOVRT group. The operative time of TOVRT group was longer than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). The postoperative drainage volume of TOVRT group was more than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). The drainage tube placement time of TOVRT group were longer than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also found in intraoperative bleeding volume, pain score and medical expense between the two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of perioperative common complications such as hypoparathyroidism and vocal cord paralysis in the two groups was almost identical (P > 0.05). However, there were some specific complications such as surgical area infection (one case), skin burn (one case), oral tear (two cases), and paresthesia of the lower lip and the chin (two cases) were found in TOVRT group. Obviously, the postoperative cosmetic effect of the TOVRT group was better than TLCIT group (P < 0.05). TOVRT is safe and feasible for low to moderate-risk PTC patients and is a potential alternative for patients who require no scar on their neck. Patients accepted TOVRT can get more satisfaction and have less psychologic injury caused by surgery.

"Three-in-One Wonder": A Retrospective Cohort Study on Modified Robotic-Assisted Transoral Thyroidectomy

IMPORTANCE

With advancements in robotic surgery, robotic-assisted thyroidectomy is gaining popularity. The introduction of the 3-port transoral robotic thyroidectomy (T-TORT) offers an alternative approach with potential benefits in postoperative recovery compared to traditional methods.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and feasibility of T-TORT in comparison to the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study with 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted to compare perioperative outcomes between T-TORT and TOETVA. The learning curve was analyzed using cumulative summation (CUSUM).

SETTING

Tertiary A hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty-two patients who underwent either T-TORT or TOETVA were included.

INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURES

The T-TORT group underwent three-port robotic thyroidectomy, while the TOETVA group received standard transoral vestibular endoscopic thyroidectomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Demographics and perioperative data were compared. The learning curve was evaluated using CUSUM.

RESULTS

Compared with the TOETVA group the operation time in minutes of the T-TORT group was relatively longer (136.14 ± 36.52 vs 122.49 ± 34.85, P = .012), the postoperative stay, in days, was shorter (2.77 ± 0.78 vs 3.51 ± 0.95, P < .001), the drainage volume on a postoperative day 1 (POD1) and POD2, in milliliter, was less (POD1 56.57 ± 23.29 vs 65.12 ± 26.04, P = .029 and POD2 27.43 ± 25.29 vs 38.21 ± 25.09, P = .008). The other statistics, including bleeding amount, retrieved and metastatic central lymph nodes, visual analog scale score, and drainage volume on an operative day were comparable between the 2 groups. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative complication rates. The turning point of the learning curve was in the 16th case with a hemithyroidectomy with central neck dissection (CND) and the 21st case with a bilateral thyroidectomy with CND.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

T-TORT is a safe and feasible option with enhanced postoperative recovery compared to TOETVA. It may be a preferable choice in specific clinical situations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (UIN: ChiCTR2300069021, https://www.chictr.org.cn) in accordance with the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki, 2013.

TOETVA: a single surgeon's learning curve and a case report of CASTLE thyroid tumor

BACKGROUND

Owing to the lack of visible scars, the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) offers superior aesthetic outcomes compared to conventional thyroidectomy. Carcinoma showing thymus-like differentiation (CASTLE) represents a rare thyroid gland neoplasm. This study aimed to explore the TOETVA learning curve and present a case report of CASTLE.

METHODS

A study with precise 1:1 matching was conducted to assess the procedure safety and cancer control outcomes of TOETVA in comparison to conventional surgery between May 2020 and May 2023. Cumulative sum analysis was employed to optimally fit the learning curve. Subsequently, a case report of CASTLE treated with TOETVA surgery was presented.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was longer in the TOETVA group than in the open group. The TOETVA group had a higher incidence of skin numbness and excellent cosmetic outcomes compared to the open group. The learning curves for work area preparation, unilateral thyroid lobectomy, and the entire surgical process were 59, 28, and 50 cases, respectively. There were no differences between the learning and proficient groups, except for operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and drainage volume on the first postoperative day.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive analysis of the TOETVA learning curve utilizing cumulative and analytical methods demonstrated the feasibility of TOETVA with regards to surgical integrity, safety, and oncological safety. This study's findings suggest that a surgeon's cumulative number of TOETVA cases exceeding 50 can reach the mastery stage. Moreover, diagnosing CASTLE is challenging and necessitates immunohistochemical detection of relatively specific markers associated with thymic epithelial tumors.

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach vs. transoral robotic thyroidectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT). We carried out a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar on studies comparing TOETVA and TORT until January 2023. A total of five articles published between 2018 and 2023 that matched the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies included 641 patients (394 TOETVA patients and 247 TORT patients). TOETVA group was associated with a significantly shorter operative time with a mean difference of 60.08 min [95% confidence interval (CI) - 83.95 to - 36.20; P < 0.001). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was more common in the TOETVA group than the TORT group (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.14-7.88; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the other outcomes, including the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scores, number of central lymph nodes retrieved, permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, and transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism. The TOETVA group was associated with shorter operative time and more transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy than the TORT group. Each procedure has its benefits and limitations. The surgical approach should be determined by considering the patient's characteristics and preferences, as well as the surgeon's preference and area of expertise.

Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: the mid-term oncological outcome

BACKGROUND

Traditional open thyroidectomy is the surgical standard for thyroid cancer; however, it inevitably leaves a visible scar on the neck and affects the patient's quality of life. Therefore, to avoid making a neck incision, the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) have been developed recently, and the surgical outcomes of these techniques are as favorable as open surgery for benign disease. Additionally, positive short-term surgical outcomes have also been achieved in a few patients with thyroid cancer. However, no data on the mid-to-long-term recurrence and survival rates of transoral thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer are available. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the surgical outcomes and mid-term oncological results of the TOETVA and TORT in patients with thyroid cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who had received TOETVA or TORT between July 2017 and November 2021 and followed up on their oncological outcomes until December 2022. Perioperative surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 115 patients underwent 122 operations (57 TOETVAs and 65 TORTs), including seven complete thyroidectomies for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), Stage I-II, including T1-T3, N0-N1a, and initial low- to high-risk groups. There was no conversion from transoral to open surgery. TORT required a longer operating time (median [interquartile range]) than TOETVA (lobectomy: 279 [250, 318] vs. 196 [173, 253] min, p < 0.001; bilateral total thyroidectomy: 375 [309, 433] vs. 279 [238, 312] min, p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between the two groups regarding perioperative complications. Complete thyroidectomy with a second transoral approach was safe. TOETVA and TORT achieved favorable oncological outcomes with 100% survival and 98.2% acceptable response (excellent and indeterminate response) during a mean 37.88 ± 12.42 months mid-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy was safe and achieved favorable mid-term oncological outcomes in a selected cohort of patients with early-stage DTC.

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach as a safe and feasible alternative to open thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is a scarless alternative to open thyroidectomy (OT). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize evidence comparing the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of TOETVA and OT.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies comparing the outcomes of TOETVA and OT published before February 2023. The outcomes of interest were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative pain, number of central lymph nodes retrieved, number of metastatic central lymph nodes, and incidences of transient and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, transient and permanent hypocalcemia, hematoma, and infection.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies published between 2016 and 2022, involving a total of 2889 patients (TOETVA, n =1085; OT, n =1804) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the TOETVA group had a significantly longer overall operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] 55.19; 95% CI, 39.15, 71.23; P <0.001), longer hospital stay (WMD, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14, 0.39; P <0.001), and lower pain scores on postoperative day 1 (WMD, -1.41; 95% CI, -2.79, -0.03; P =0.04) than the OT group. Other intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

TOETVA has a similar safety profile to OT with less postoperative pain, making it an appropriate and more cosmetically appealing alternative to OT for select patients.

Robotic versus endoscopic transoral thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid cancer: A comparative analysis of surgical outcomes in 240 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

This study compared the surgical outcomes of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).

METHODS

The TOETVA and TORT groups comprised 119 and 121 patients between November 2016 and May 2022. Clinico-surgical outcomes and operation times were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The TORT group showed a higher number of retrieved central compartment lymph nodes, shorter hospital stays, and lower pain score after 48 h than the TOETVA group. No significant difference was observed in the other postoperative complications, including permanent vocal cord palsy. Total operation, working space creation, and endoscopic or robotic surgery times of the TORT group were longer than those of the TOETVA group.

CONCLUSIONS

TORT and TOETVA are feasible and safe. TORT may have some advantages, such as central compartment node dissection, shorter hospital stays, and pain score after 48 h in PTC, despite a longer operative time.

The global status and hotspots of research in the field of trans-oral endoscopic thyroidectomy (TOET) from 2008 to 2022

Purpose

In this study, the aim was to comprehensively analyze the current status, hotspots, and trends of trans-oral endoscopic thyroidectomy (TOET) through bibliometric analysis and by presenting the field atlas.

Methods

Web of Science Core Collection database was adopted to screen studies regarding TOET published between January 1, 2008 and August 1, 2022. The evaluation covered the criteria total number of studies, keywords, and contributions from countries/regions, institutions, journals, and authors.

Results

A total of 229 studies were covered. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES is the largest publication in the field of TOET. The three countries that contributed the most studies were Korea, China, and the USA. The most frequently occurring core keywords in the field of TOET are vestibular approach, outcomes, experience, safety, robotic thyroidectomy, scar, video-assisted thyroidectomy and quality-of-life. The seven clusters were generated in this study: intraoperative monitoring of the laryngeal return nerve (# 0), learning curve (# 1), postoperative quality of life (# 2), central lymph node dissection and safety (# 3), complications (# 4), minimally invasive surgery (# 5), and robotic surgery (# 6).

Conclusion

The main research topics in the field of TOET place focuses on learning curves, laryngeal nerve monitoring, carbon dioxide gas bolus, chin nerve injury, surgical complications, and surgical safety. In the future, more academics will focus on the safety of the procedure and reducing complications..