Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Robotic-assisted neovaginal creation: stepwise approach to the Davydov technique in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the robotic-assisted Davydov technique for neovaginal creation in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

DESIGN

Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video.

SUBJECTS

A 27-year-old patient has been diagnosed with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome since the age of 18 years. Three months ago, vaginal dilation was attempted at another medical center but was unsuccessful because of intolerance. Pelvic examination revealed a shallow vaginal dimple.

EXPOSURE

After identification of the anatomical structures, the rectovaginal and vesicovaginal spaces were dissected, creating a space for the neovaginal canal and forming anterior and posterior peritoneal flaps. After complete dissection of the rectum from the posterior pelvic peritoneum, the vaginal remnant was bluntly dissected externally under guidance of a blunt-tipped curette handle and connected adequately to the introitus. Subsequently, the created anterior and posterior flaps were individually interrupted with sutures to form the neovaginal entrance. After the neovaginal entrance was established, the robot was used again to continuously suture the uterine remnants to create the anterior neovaginal wall. The uterine remnants, rectal serosa, and internal portions of the flaps were then joined together to form the neovaginal vault.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demonstration of the steps for the robotic management of neovaginal creation in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

RESULTS

The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1 with a soft mold in the vagina. On postoperative day 3, the soft mold was replaced with a medium-sized rigid mold. By postoperative day 6, the patient could insert a full-size rigid mold. The patient achieved full penetration and engaged in sexual activity within 1 month, with no postoperative complications observed. At the 8-month follow-up, the neovaginal cavity measured 13.4 cm in depth and 4.7 cm in diameter.

CONCLUSION

Creating a neovagina using the robotic-assisted Davydov technique in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome is a safe, feasible, beneficial, and highly effective method. Although the superiority of robotic systems over laparoscopy has not yet been fully established through extensive publications, the advantages provided by high-image quality, magnification, and maneuverability are highlighted in this study. Robotic technology could be particularly beneficial for patients with obesity or those with complex pelvic anatomy because of prior surgeries.

Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a formidable global health challenge, ranking among the most prevalent malignancies and a principal contributor to cancer-associated mortality. While traditional open surgery has historically been the cornerstone of CRC treatment, the advent of minimally invasive techniques, particularly robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS), has garnered significant momentum owing to technological advancements in the field. Robotic platforms, exemplified by the da Vinci Surgical System, offer superior three-dimensional visualization, enhanced dexterity, and heightened precision, yielding improved perioperative outcomes, particularly in anatomically intricate regions such as the pelvis. This review provides a critical appraisal of the current landscape of RACS, emphasizing its superiority over conventional open and laparoscopic approaches. The increased control and precision afforded by robotic surgery have been shown to optimize outcomes in complex procedures such as total mesorectal excision, with evidence indicating reduced intraoperative blood loss, shortened hospital stays, and improved functional recovery. Nonetheless, challenges persist, including absence of haptic feedback, prohibitive costs, and steep learning curve associated with robotic systems. Despite these limitations, RACS has demonstrated considerable promise in sphincter-preserving and function-preserving procedures, ultimately enhancing postoperative quality of life. Beyond the surgical field, this review also investigates the integration of robotic surgery within multidisciplinary treatment strategies for CRC, particularly in the context of locally advanced rectal cancer. The combination of robotic techniques with total neoadjuvant therapy and immunotherapy-especially in tumors characterized by mismatch repair deficiency or high microsatellite instability has shown notable clinical efficacy. Furthermore, emerging personalized therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapies and targeted chemotherapeutic agents, emphasize the transformative potential of RACS in delivering superior oncologic outcomes. Looking towards the future, innovations in robotic platforms, including intraoperative imaging, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality, herald new possibilities for further enhancing the precision and efficacy of colorectal surgeries. The standardization of RACS protocols, alongside ongoing training and robust clinical research, will be critical to fully realizing the benefits of these advancements across diverse clinical settings. By incorporating cutting-edge technologies and personalized treatment methods, robotic-assisted surgery is prepared to become a cornerstone in future of CRC management, with the potential to significantly improve both survival outcomes and patient quality of life.

The AI-enhanced surgeon - integrating black-box artificial intelligence in the operating room

New artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) technology offers great potential to assist surgeons with real-time intra-operative decision-making. While, AI/ML-driven analysis tools for surgeons currently focus primarily on technical assistance and postoperative insights, AI/ML cognitive support in surgery can improve their usefulness. However, AI/ML models usually conceal their underlying algorithmic reasoning process. As a result, such "black box" AI/ML models have important clinical and legal implications for patient safety and surgeon liability. This article provides an overview of surgeons' current practice and the potential for AI enhancement in surgical decision-making. It suggests a path toward a safe and effective integration of black-box AI/ML models into the operating room. We posit that future surgeons who rely on AI for cognitive assistance do not necessarily need to fully understand, interpret, and explain the algorithmic basis of an AI's real-time recommendation in the midst of surgery, but rather, they need to know that these tools work as promised. Assuming new black-box AI/ML models demonstrate clear benefits for surgical patients, their use will likely be incorporated into the legal standard of care and affect the liability landscape for surgeons.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted sugery for rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy: a large volume single center experience

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer patients undergoing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery after receiving neo-adjuvant therapy. There is a lack of clarity on this topic, necessitating a comprehensive comparison.

METHOD

Between January 2017 and December 2021, consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic rectal resection at a major public medical center were enrolled. All participants received neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) before surgery. The primary objective of this study was to assess the sphincter preservation rate and the rate of conversion to open surgery, using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Secondary endpoints included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), short-term postoperative complications, long-term oncological prognosis, and the occurrence of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

RESULT

A total of 575 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer participated in the cohort study, with 183 individuals undergoing robotic surgery and 392 undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Patients in the robotic group tended to be younger and had higher ypT, cT, and cN stages, lower tumor locations, and higher rates of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) and circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity. PSM resulted in 183 patients in the robotic group and 187 in the laparoscopic group. We found a higher sphincter preservation rate in robotic group compared with laparoscopic group (92.9% vs. 86.1%, P = 0.033), with no significant difference in conversion to open surgery(P > 0.05). The robotic group had a higher incidence of postoperative chylous ascites (4.9% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.029) and potentially lower sepsis occurrence (0% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.085). No significant differences were observed in long-term oncological prognosis or 5-year survival rates (P > 0.05). The median survival time for each group was 34 months. Subgroup analysis of 76 rectal cancer patients who underwent intersphincteric resection (ISR) surgery indicated that those who selected robotic surgery had higher cN and cT stages. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed in short-term and long-term clinical outcomes, LARS, OS time, and DFS time between the two surgical modalities. The primary outcomes of interest, specifically the rate of sphincter preservation and the rate of conversion to open laparotomy, showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer, following preoperative nCRT, demonstrates comparable technical safety and oncological outcomes to laparoscopic surgery. Further comprehensive studies are needed to to confirm the potential advantages of robotic surgical interventions.

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robotic Intraoperative Adverse Events in Benign Gynecological Procedures and the Correlation of the Adverse Events With Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Analysis

Introduction Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are a part of any gynecological surgery, including laparoscopy and robotic surgery. Robotic surgery, with advanced three-dimensional vision, is supposed to have fewer complications than laparoscopy. We aim to compare iAEs between laparoscopic (LA) and robotic (RA) procedures and correlate them with postoperative complications and risk factor analysis. Methods A prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care center between July and October 2023 with 80 cases (myomectomy, hysterectomy, and endometriosis resection). Intraoperative (as per ClassIntra classification) and postoperative (as per Clavien-Dindo classification) complications were recorded, and data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Categorical variables were summarized as n (%), while quantitative variables were summarized by mean ±S.D. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done for risk analysis (adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval). Results Overall, we reported 3.75% (3/80) iAEs (all in LA) and 32.5% (26/80) postoperative complications. Increased postoperative complications were seen in LA 15/40 (37.5%) than in RA 11/40 (27.5%). However, the difference was statistically insignificant (p =0.12 and p =0.47). Cases with higher iAE grades consecutively experienced higher postoperative complications (p 0.0001). The independent clinical risk factors, ASA score II status (aOR: 2.335, 95%CI: 0.707-7.709), increasing uterine size (aOR: 1.076, 95%CI: 0.953-1.214), endometriosis (aOR: 2.337, 95%CI: 0.615-8.878), previous surgical history (aOR: 1.595, 95%CI: 0.544-4.677), and lower preoperative hemoglobin (aOR: 0.721, 95%CI: 0.502-1.036), affecting postoperative complications were analyzed. However, none of the factors had a statistically significant association with postoperative complications. Conclusions We observed lesser complication rates in robotic surgery than in conventional laparoscopy. We also found that those with higher iAE grades were strongly associated with higher postoperative complication grades.

Advances in Reconstructive Robotic Microsurgery in the Extremity

Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising technique for reconstructive procedures, offering potential advantages across various surgical fields. Following initial case reports on the use of the Symani Surgical System (Medical Microinstruments, S.p.A) for microsurgical anastomosis, the authors evaluated its full potential in extremity reconstruction. They conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with soft tissue defects of the upper and lower extremities treated between February 2022 and May 2024. Each patient underwent soft tissue reconstruction with free tissue transfer with microsurgical anastomosis performed using the Symani Surgical System. The study included 7 male patients and 1 female patient, aged between 19 and 71 years (mean age: 50.6 y). The most used recipient vessels were the anterior tibial artery and vein (37.5%). The preferred anastomotic technique was end-to-side in arterial anastomoses (6/8). All arterial anastomoses were performed using the Symani Surgical System. The mean anastomosis time was 33.2±5.8 minutes. One out of 8 patients required surgical revision outside of the anastomosis. The authors' findings suggest that using the Symani Surgical System for microanastomosis in extremity reconstruction is a safe and effective approach, leading to satisfactory outcomes in different anatomic regions. The system allows for the successful execution of various anastomosis techniques, including end-to-end and end-to-side connections, using single interrupted or running sutures, which enhances its versatility in complex reconstructive procedures. The benefits of robotic assistance in terms of precision and ergonomics are promising for the future of reconstructive microsurgery.

Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Elective Sigmoid Resection for Complicated Diverticulitis

Objective

Minimally invasive surgical techniques for colorectal surgery have continued to grow in prevalence with robotic surgery potentially providing advantages in complex pelvic operations. We sought to examine the outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic elective sigmoid colon resection for complicated diverticulitis.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients at an academic tertiary care center from 2018-2023 who underwent elective minimally invasive sigmoid colon resections for complicated diverticulitis. Multiple regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes being reoperation within 30 days and overall complications. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open, estimated blood loss, operative time, days until return of bowel function, and length of stay.

Results

In this cohort of 131 patients, 38 underwent laparoscopic colectomy and 93 patients underwent robotic colectomy. There were no significant differences between rate of reoperation (7.7% vs 2.1%, P = .42), complications (5.1% vs 8.4%, P = .52), conversion to open (5.1% vs 2.1%, P = .25), days until return of bowel function (1.87 vs 2.01, P = .41), or length of stay (5.2 vs 5.2, P = .92). There were significant differences in operative time and estimated blood loss. Robotic approach was 128.11 minutes longer (β = 128.11, SE = 12, p < .001) and had 33.4 cc less estimated blood loss (β = -33.4, SE = 16.6, P = .046), when adjusting for other confounders.

Conclusion

Robotic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis had mostly equivalent outcomes at this institution. There was some decrease in estimated blood loss, however, operative time was increased in the robotic group.

Clinical, Preclinical, and Educational Applications of Robotic-Assisted Flap Reconstruction and Microsurgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Microsurgery and super-microsurgery allow for highly technical reconstructive surgeries to be performed, with repairs of anatomical areas of less than 1 mm. Robotic-assisted surgery might allow for further advances within microsurgery, providing higher precision, accuracy, and scope to operate in previously inaccessible anatomical areas. However, robotics is not well-established within this field. We provide a summary of the clinical and preclinical uses of robotics within flap reconstruction and microsurgery, educational models, and the barriers to widespread implementation.

METHODS

A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was conducted of PubMed, Medline, and Embase. Preclinical, educational, and clinical articles were included.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred and forty-two articles were screened; 87 articles met the inclusion criteria across flap harvest, flap/vessel pedicle dissection, vascular anastomosis, and nerve repair. The literature presents several potential benefits to the surgeon and patient such as high cosmetic satisfaction, minimally invasive access with reduced scarring (flap harvest), and low complication rates. Lack of haptic feedback was reported by authors to not impede the ability to perform vessel anastomosis; however, this required further investigation. A steep learning curve was identified, particularly for microsurgeons embarking upon robotic-assisted surgery.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted surgery can potentially enhance microsurgery and flap reconstruction, with feasibility demonstrated within this review, up to anastomosis of 0.4 mm in diameter. However, there is a lack of sufficiently powered comparative studies, required to strengthen this statement. To increase accessibility to robotic surgery for plastic and reconstructive surgeons, educational opportunities must be developed with standardized assessment of skill acquisition.

Robotic Single Anastomosis Duodenal-ileal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S) for Morbid Obesity: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/AIM

The global obesity epidemic has seen a dramatic increase in prevalence since 1975, posing significant health and economic challenges worldwide. Robotic-assisted single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) has emerged as a promising surgical intervention for morbid obesity, offering potential advantages over traditional laparoscopic approaches in terms of precision, safety, and recovery outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted SADI-S, focusing on perioperative and postoperative outcomes including intraoperative complications, operative time, conversion rates, mortality, length of hospital stay, weight loss, and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, adhering to inclusion and exclusion criteria focused on obese adult humans undergoing robotic SADI-S. Seven studies, published between 2015 and 2024, involving 204 patients, were ultimately included for analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed a low rate of intraoperative complications (0.49%), no mortality, and varied operative times (138 to 205.7 min). The median hospital stay ranged from 2 to 6.7 days, with minimal readmission rates. Postoperative complications occurred in 6.37% of patients, but no late complications (>30 days) were reported. Notably, significant weight loss outcomes were documented, with mean excess weight loss (EWL) up to 113.74% at 24 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted SADI-S demonstrates a favourable safety profile with promising weight loss outcomes, highlighting its potential as a primary or revisional treatment for morbid obesity. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to establish its long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional laparoscopic methods.

Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a hands-on surgical robotics workshop for medical students and early-career doctors

Despite the increased adoption of robotic surgery across various specialities, medical students and early-career doctors have limited exposure. This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a hands-on surgical robotics workshop for those early-career medics. 26 participants with minimal prior exposure to robotic surgery attended a workshop using the Versius© robotic surgical system and Virtual Reality simulation platforms. We analysed pre-workshop registration form and post-workshop feedback form utilising mixed quantitative and qualitative approach. Pre-workshop registration revealed motivations and barriers to attending surgical robotics courses. Post-workshop evaluations showed significant improvements in self-assessment scores, familiarity with robotic surgery, and confidence in using the technology. All participants expressed a strong enthusiasm for greater access to robotic surgery education and 84% of participants strongly agreed this workshop increased their interests in surgical specialities. The study also highlighted the perceived ease of use of robotic systems compared to laparoscopic instruments and explored the potential of virtual reality in surgical training. Further efforts are needed for better integration of robotic surgery training into medical curricula to prepare future surgeons for the evolving surgical landscape.

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Concurrent neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (nCRT) with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone sometimes fails to cure lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Therefore, additional lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) can help in the treatment of these patients. This is what we refer to as extended total mesorectal excision (eTME). Such operations (TME alone or eTME) can be performed using conventional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted techniques as well. Our meta-analysis aims to compare the results of robot-assisted (R-eTME) versus laparoscopic-assisted extended mesorectal excision (L-eTME) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODOLOGY

Databases searched using title and abstract included Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, up to February 20, 2024. All studies that documented robotic versus laparoscopic procedures for extended total mesorectal excision (R-eTME versus L-eTME) and reported more than two relevant outcomes, were included in the study.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates four significant outcomes (operative time, urinary complications, overall recurrence, and admission days) between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The robotic approach shows advantages over the laparoscopic approach in these outcomes except for the operative time (minute), which was longer in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic group is associated with a higher overall recurrence than the robotic group with an Odds Ratio of 2(95% CI, 1-4, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis study showed that the R-eTME group had a lower recurrence rate compared to the L-eTME group. Additionally, hospital admission days increased significantly in the laparoscopic group. Other long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Short-term outcomes were similar, except for more urinary complications in the laparoscopic group. In conclusion, the study suggests that robotic surgery may offer advantages over laparoscopic surgery for eTME. Further research and analysis could provide further insight into the potential benefits of robotic surgery in this procedure, particularly when surgeon experience, center volume, and learning curve are taken into consideration.

Analysis of the impact on sexual function in early-onset overweight male patients with rectal cancer following robotic surgery

The effect of radical resection of male rectal cancer on sexual function has been the focus of attention. Despite this, there remains a dearth of robust evidence regarding the influence of robotic radical resection of rectal cancer on postoperative sexual function, particularly in men diagnosed at an early age. This study aims to explore the implications of robotic radical resection of rectal cancer on sexual function in early-onset overweight male patients diagnosed with this disease. A retrospective analysis was performed on male patients under 50 years old and over 20 years old who were diagnosed with rectal cancer (cT1-3N0M0) and underwent surgical treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from May 2015 to August 2020. Sexual function was evaluated by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) test and scored at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The sexual function of traditional laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer (L-RE) and robotic radical resection of rectal cancer (R-RE) were compared. According to body mass index, L-RE and R-RE groups were further divided into normal body weight groups (LN-RE and RN-RE) and overweight groups (LO-RE and RO-RE), and the sexual function of each group was compared successively. Neither L-RE nor R-RE patients had significant differences in number of lymph nodes removed, tumour size, pathological TNM stage, or first exhaust time or time to eat liquids. The OS and DFS of the L-RE and R-RE groups, as well as the LO-RE and RO-RE groups, did not differ statistically after the logarithmic rank test (P > 0.05). IIEF scores in both the L-RE and R-RE groups declined sharply 1 month after surgery and then steadily increased. The R-RE group's IIEF scores significantly recovered in 6 months, compared to 12 months in the L-RE group. In comparison of subgroups, the results of sexual function in the LN-RE and RN-RE groups were similar to those in the L-RE and R-RE groups. Conversely, the RO-RE group showed slightly improved sexual function recovery than the LO-RE group 3 and 6 months post-surgery. 12 months after surgery, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. With similar long-term oncology outcomes, the robot-assisted surgical approach provided better protection of sexual function for men with early-onset rectal cancer, especially for those with a higher body mass index (BMI).

A Systematic Review of Ureteral Reimplantation Techniques in Endometriosis: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-Assisted Approach

Introduction: Endometriosis, characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, includes deep endometriosis (DE), which can affect the urinary tract. Ureteral endometriosis (UE) is a rare but significant manifestation that can lead to ureteral obstruction, hydronephrosis, and potential kidney loss. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted ureteral reimplantation techniques in patients with UE. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to July 2024. Studies included patients with UE who underwent ureteral reimplantation using laparoscopic or robotic-assisted techniques. Data on patient demographics, surgical technique, duration of surgery, complications, follow-up duration, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 225 patients in the laparoscopic group and 24 in the robotic-assisted group. Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation, with or without a psoas hitch, was the predominant technique used. The average surgery duration was 271.1 min for the laparoscopic group and 310.4 min for the robotic-assisted group. Recurrence rates for UE were 2.95% for laparoscopic and 5.9% for robotic-assisted procedures. The robotic-assisted group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (6.7 days vs. 9.1 days, p < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two techniques (p = 0.422). Conclusions: Both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques for ureteral reimplantation in UE are safe and effective, with the choice of technique guided by surgeon expertise and specific clinical scenarios. However, the limited number of robotic cases introduces a bias, despite statistical significance.

Establishment of a 24/7 robotic acute care surgery program at a large academic medical center

BACKGROUND

For many years, robotic surgery has been an option for various elective surgical procedures. Though robotic surgery has not traditionally been the first choice for acute surgical patients, recent work has shown promise in broader applications. However, there are limited data regarding how to establish an institutional robotics program for higher acuity patients. This project aimed to map a pathway for the creation of an acute care surgery robotic program at a large academic medical center.

METHODS

Various stakeholders were gathered jointly with our surgical faculty: anesthesia, operating room leadership, surgical technologists, circulating nurses, Central Sterile Supply, and Intuitive Surgical Inc. representatives. Staff underwent robotics training, and surgical technologists were trained as bedside first assistants. Nontraditional robotic operating rooms were allocated for coordinated placement of appropriate cases, and pre-made case carts were arranged with staff to be available at all hours. A workflow was created between surgical faculty and staff to streamline add-on robotic cases to the daily schedule.

RESULTS

Six faculty and two fellows are now credentialed in robotics surgery, and additional surgeons are undergoing training. Numerous staff have completed training to perform operative assistant duties. The operating capacity of robotic acute care surgeries has more than doubled in just one year, from 77 to 172 cases between 2022 and 2023, respectively. Two add-on cases can be accommodated per day. Select patients are being offered robotic surgeries in the acute surgical setting, and ongoing efforts are being made to create guidelines for which patients would best benefit from robotic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Launching a successful robotic surgery program requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary effort to ensure seamless integration into daily operations. Additional assistance from outside technology representatives can help to ensure comfort with procedures. Further studies are needed to determine the acute patient population that may benefit most from robotic surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Enlarged Cervical Leiomyoma with Concomitant Uterine Prolapse: A Case Report

This case report details the surgical treatment of a rare enlarged cervical leiomyoma with uterine prolapse in a 48-year-old woman. She presented to Konyang University Hospital with a palpable vaginal mass, lower abdominal pain, and urinary incontinence. Despite being nulliparous, she had severe chronic constipation due to schizophrenia medication and lived in a health care facility separated from her family. Pelvic examination revealed stage 3 uterine prolapse with a large necrotic cervical leiomyoma. A robot-assisted vaginal hysterectomy followed by sacrocolpopexy was performed using the Da Vinci Xi Surgical System. Histopathology confirmed cervical leiomyoma with squamous metaplasia. At a three-month follow-up, there were no complications, pelvic anatomy was restored, and urinary incontinence improved. Although the patient had a systemic infection due to the necrotic cervical leiomyoma, raising concerns about the increased risk of infection associated with mesh use, she was high-risk for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence due to her medical history and living situation. Therefore, she underwent concurrent surgeries with pre- and postoperative antibiotic treatment, and recovered without complications. Given that the risk of developing POP increases after a hysterectomy, in high-risk patients, as demonstrated in this case, the concurrent surgical correction of POP may be an effective strategy.

Evaluation of a newly developed oral and maxillofacial surgical robotic platform (KD-SR-01) in head and neck surgery: a preclinical trial in porcine models

Traditional open head and neck surgery often leaves permanent scars, significantly affecting appearance. The emergence of surgical robots has introduced a new era for minimally invasive surgery. However, the complex anatomy of the head and neck region, particularly the oral and maxillofacial areas, combined with the high costs associated with established systems such as the da Vinci, has limited the widespread adoption of surgical robots in this field. Recently, surgical robotic platform in China has developed rapidly, exemplified by the promise shown by the KangDuo Surgical Robot (KD-SR). Although the KD-SR has achieved some results comparable to the da Vinci surgical robot in urology and colorectal surgery, its performance in complex head and neck regions remains untested. This study evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of the newly developed KD-SR-01, comparing it with standard endoscopic systems in head and neck procedures on porcine models. We performed parotidectomy, submandibular gland resection, and neck dissection, collected baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and specifically assessed cognitive workload using the NASA-TLX. None of the robotic procedures were converted to endoscopic or open surgery. The results showed no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P = 0.126), better intraoperative bleeding control (P = 0.001), and a significant reduction in cognitive workload (P < 0.001) in the robotic group. In conclusion, the KD-SR-01 is feasible, effective, and safe for head and neck surgery. Further investigation through well-designed clinical trials with long-term follow-up is necessary to establish the full potential of this emerging robotic platform.

Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review

Robot-assisted general surgery, an advanced technology in minimally invasive procedures, is increasingly employed in elective general surgery, showing benefits over laparoscopy in specific cases. Although laparoscopy remains a standard approach for common acute abdominal conditions, the role of robotic surgery in emergency general surgery remains uncertain. This systematic review aims to compare outcomes in acute general surgery settings for robotic versus laparoscopic surgeries. A PRISMA-compliant systematic search across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. The literature review focused on articles comparing perioperative outcomes of emergency general surgery managed laparoscopically versus robot-assisted. A descriptive analysis was performed, and outcome measures were recorded. Six articles, involving 1,063 patients, compared outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic procedures. Two articles covered cholecystectomies, while the others addressed ileocaecal resection, subtotal colectomy, hiatal hernia and repair of perforated gastrojejunal ulcers. The level of evidence was low. Laparoscopic bowel resection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) had higher complications; no significant differences were found in complications for other operations. Operative time showed no differences for cholecystectomies, but robotic approaches took longer for other procedures. Robotic cases had shorter hospital length of stay, although the associated costs were significantly higher. Perioperative outcomes for emergency robotic surgery in selected general surgery conditions are comparable to laparoscopic surgery. However, recommending robotic surgery in the acute setting necessitates a well-powered large population study for stronger evidence.

Outpatient and Ambulatory Extended Recovery Robotic Hepatectomy: Multinational Study of 307 Cases

BACKGROUND

For open minor hepatectomy, morbidity and recovery are dominated by the incision. The robotic approach may transform this "incision dominant procedure" into a safe outpatient procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

We audited outpatient (less than 2 midnights) robotic hepatectomy at 6 hepatobiliary centers in 2 nations to test the hypothesis that the robotic approach can be a safe and effective short-stay procedure. Establishing early recovery after surgery programs were active at all sites, and home digital monitoring was available at 1 of the institutions.

RESULTS

A total of 307 outpatient (26 same-day and 281 next-day discharge) robotic hepatectomies were identified (2013 to 2023). Most were minor hepatectomies (194 single segments, 90 bi-segmentectomies, 14 three segments, and 8 four segments). Thirty-nine (13%) were for benign histology, whereas 268 were for cancer (33 hepatocellular carcinoma, 27 biliary, and 208 metastatic disease). Patient characteristics were a median age of 60 years (18 to 93 years), 55% male, and a median BMI of 26 kg/m 2 (14 to 63 kg/m 2 ). Thirty (10%) patients had cirrhosis. One hundred eighty-seven (61%) had previous abdominal operation. Median operative time was 163 minutes (30 to 433 minutes), with a median blood loss of 50 mL (10 to 900 mL). There were no deaths and 6 complications (2%): 2 wound infections, 1 failure to thrive, and 3 perihepatic abscesses. Readmission was required in 5 (1.6%) patients. Of the 268 malignancy cases, 25 (9%) were R1 resections. Of the 128 with superior segment resections (segments 7, 8, 4A, 2, and 1), there were 12 positive margins (9%) and 2 readmissions for abscess.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient robotic hepatectomy in well-selected cases is safe (0 mortality, 2% complication, and 1.6% readmission), including resection in the superior or posterior portions of the liver that is challenging with nonarticulating laparoscopic instruments.

The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of robotics has grown exponentially. There is an active interest amongst practitioners in the transferability of the potential benefits into plastic and reconstructive surgery; however, many plastic surgeons report lack of widespread implementation, training, or clinical exposure. We report the current evidence base, and surgical opportunities, alongside key barriers, and limitations to overcome, to develop the use of robotics within the field. This systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and Embase has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024524237). Preclinical, educational, and clinical articles were included, within the scope of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2, 181, articles were screened; 176 articles met the inclusion criteria across lymph node dissection, flap and microsurgery, vaginoplasty, craniofacial reconstruction, abdominal wall reconstruction and transoral robotic surgery (TOR). A number of benefits have been reported including technical advantages such as better visualisation, improved precision and accuracy, and tremor reduction. Patient benefits include lower rate of complications and quicker recovery; however, there is a longer operative duration in some categories. Cost presents a significant barrier to implementation. Robotic surgery presents an exciting opportunity to improve patient outcomes and surgical ease of use, with feasibility for many subspecialities demonstrated in this review. However, further higher quality comparative research with careful case selection, which is adequately powered, as well as the inclusion of cost-analysis, is necessary to fully understand the true benefit for patient care, and justification for resource utilisation.

Is the robotic revolution stunting surgical skills?

This perspective piece aims to examine the impact of the growing utilization of robotic platforms in general and minimally invasive surgery on surgical trainee experience, skill level, and comfort in performing general surgical and minimally invasive procedures following completion of training. We review current literature and explore the application of robotic surgery to surgical training, where minimum case thresholds and breadth distribution are well defined, and where development of surgical technique is historically gained through delicate tissue handling with haptic feedback rather than relying on visual feedback alone. We call for careful consideration as to how best to incorporate robotics in surgical training in order to embrace technological advances without endangering the surgical proficiency of the surgeons of tomorrow.

Key message

The large-scale incorporation of robotics into general and minimally invasive surgical training is something that most, if not all, trainees must grapple with in today's world, and the proportion of robotics is increasing. This shift may significantly negatively affect trainees in terms of surgical skill upon completion of training and must be approached with an appropriate degree of concern and thoughtfulness so as to protect the surgeons of tomorrow.

Artificial intelligence in surgery

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging in healthcare, yet applications in surgery remain relatively nascent. Here we review the integration of AI in the field of surgery, centering our discussion on multifaceted improvements in surgical care in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative space. The emergence of foundation model architectures, wearable technologies and improving surgical data infrastructures is enabling rapid advances in AI interventions and utility. We discuss how maturing AI methods hold the potential to improve patient outcomes, facilitate surgical education and optimize surgical care. We review the current applications of deep learning approaches and outline a vision for future advances through multimodal foundation models.

Perception of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Robotic surgery, also known as robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), involves a camera and a small surgical instrument attached to a robotic arm. A trained surgeon operates the robot from a viewing screen while being in the same room.

METHODOLOGY

This review was prepared following Cochrane collaboration guidelines and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Two authors independently searched and appraised the studies published in PubMed, cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL), Embase, Clinical Key, and Google Scholar. Pooled data analyzed and reported in RevMan software version-5.4.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 1400 medical students, from 8 studies. The participants' age ranged from 23 to 49 years. Similarly, the sample size ranged from 25 and 300. The pooled prevalence of the existing studies revealed that 29.8% of medical students, were favorable towards RAS. Effect size (ES), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and heterogeneity (I2) [ES = 29.8, 95% CI 16.4-43.2, I2 = 95.1%, P < 0.00]. About 40% of Australian medical students' positive opinion on RAS [ES = 40.4, 95% CI 25.7-55.2]. Similarly, 34.2% of students from Saudi Arabia [ES = 29.8, 95% CI 22.4-90.8, I2 = 99.3%, P < 0.00], 27.8% students from Canada [ES = 27.8, 95% CI 15.9-39.6], 24.8% from USA [ES = 24.8, 95% CI 6.9-42.7, I2 = 77.3%, P < 0.00] and 24% [ES = 24, 95% CI 18-30] from India favorable towards RAS.

DISCUSSION

Medical students from developed nations display favorable attitudes towards RAS. However, implementing of revised curriculum at the beginning of the graduation level sparks medical students' attitude towards robotic surgery.

Robotic surgery: public perceptions and current misconceptions

Whilst surgeons and robotic companies are key stakeholders involved in the adoption of robotic assisted surgery (RS), the public's role is overlooked. However, given that patients hold ultimate power over their healthcare decisions, public acceptance of RS is crucial. Therefore, this study aims to identify public understanding, opinions, and misconceptions about RS. An online questionnaire distributed between February and May 2021 ascertained the views of UK adults on RS. The themes of questions included familiarity, experience and comfort with RS, opinions on its ethical implications, and the impact of factual information provided to the participant. The data were evaluated using thematic and statistical analysis, including assessing for statistical differences in age, gender, education level, and presence in the medical field. Overall, 216 responses were analysed. Participants were relatively uninformed about RS, with a median knowledge score of 4.00(2.00-6.00) on a 10-point Likert scale. Fears surrounding increased risk, reduced precision and technological failure were identified, alongside misconceptions about its autonomous nature. However, providing factual information in the survey about RS statistically increased participant comfort (p = < 0.0001). Most (61.8%) participants believed robot manufacturers were responsible for malfunctions, but doctors were held accountable more by older, less educated, and non-medical participants. Our findings suggest that there is limited public understanding of RS. The numerous common misconceptions identified present a major barrier to the widespread acceptance of RS, since inaccurate fears about its nature could discourage potential patients from engaging with robotic procedures.