Laparoscopic orchiopexy without division of the spermatic vessels: can it be considered the procedure of choice in cases of intraabdominal testis?

The Safety and Effectiveness of Single-Stage, Vessel-Preserving, Laparoscopic Orchiopexy for Intra-Abdominal Testes in Pediatric Patients: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

Objectives: Intra-abdominal testes are located in a variety of intra-abdominal positions, most less than 2 cm from the internal ring. Various surgical techniques of laparoscopic orchiopexy have been described to date. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of a single-stage, vessel-preserving, laparoscopic orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testes in pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective search of the medical records of 32 children (34 testes) who underwent single-stage, vessel preserving, laparoscopic orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testes between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2023 was performed. Single-stage laparoscopic orchiopexies were performed in all patients for whom sufficient length of the spermatic cord was achieved during the procedure. The volume of each patient's testes was measured using ultrasound before and 6 months after laparoscopic orchiopexy. The main outcome of this study was testicular volume before and after the procedure. The secondary outcomes were the occurrence of early and late complications, the duration of surgery, and the length of hospital stay. Results: The median age at the time of surgery was 10 months (interquartile range-IQR 9, 13). The majority of the children (n = 24; 75%) were less than 12 months old at the time of surgery. A normal testis was found in 24 patients (70.6%), while a hypotrophic testis was visible in 10 cases (29.4%). The majority of the testes were located near the internal ring (n = 19; 55.9%), while in the remaining cases, the testes were located near the iliac blood vessels. The median duration of the surgical procedure was 37.5 min (IQR 33, 42.5). The duration of hospitalization was one day for all the children. No intraoperative complications were observed. One child had a wound infection at the site of the umbilical trocar, which was treated conservatively. In two cases (5.5%), testicular atrophy was detected during long-term follow-up. In three cases, the testis was found in a higher position in the scrotum during the follow-up period, but in two cases, the position was normal during the follow-up period, while in one case, the position in the scrotum remained unchanged. At long-term follow-up with a median of 35 months (IQR 19, 60.5), the overall success rate was 94.5%. The median testicular volume at 6-month follow-up increased from 0.31 mL (IQR 0.28, 0.43) to 0.40 mL (IQR 0.33, 0.53) (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Single-stage, vessel-preserving, laparoscopic orchiopexies for intra-abdominal testes are safe and effective in pediatric patients in whom adequate spermatic cord length can be achieved during the procedure.

Laparoscopy for Abdominal Testes: Nationwide Analysis of German Routine Data

Introduction: Laparoscopy has been used for the evaluation of impalpable testes for more than 30 years. However, its use for intra-abdominal testes has never been evaluated in a population-based approach. Neither has the share of timely orchiopexies of intra-abdominal testes according to published guidelines. We aimed to provide this information by using nationwide administrative data for hospital reimbursements. Materials and Methods: We obtained data for procedures for exploration and orchiopexy of intra-abdominal testes in Germany from 2005 through 2018 and analyzed them with linear regression for the use of laparoscopy and timely repair. Results: In 2005, laparoscopy was already used in more than 60% of explorations, which composed 76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72 to 79) of children operated before their first birthday and 68% (95% CI: 65 to 70) of children up to 4 years of age. Throughout the study period, laparoscopy became increasingly popular for orchiopexy of intra-abdominal testes with a yearly increase of 1.8% (95% CI: 1.2 to 2.5, P < .001) in the first year of life and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.2 to 3.4, P < .001) until the age of 4. The share of patients treated before their first birthday increased yearly by 1.9% for explorations and 1.6% for orchiopexies (P < .001 for both) but did not exceed 30% in 2018. Conclusion: Laparoscopy is the method of choice for exploration of intra-abdominal testes and orchiopexy. In this study, more than 70% of boys were treated after their first birthday, thus not meeting the time limit set by guidelines.

Treatment of impalpable testis - one clinic's experience

Introduction

Undescended testes are recognised in 1% to 2% of boys during the first year of life, and about 20% of them are impalpable. Ultrasonography (US) may establish the localisation of the testis but the final diagnosis is usually determined laparoscopically.

Aim

To evaluate long-term results of laparoscopic treatment of boys with impalpable testes and sensitivity of preoperative ultrasound.

Material and methods

Between 2011 and 2015, we operated on 545 boys with undescended testes. Sixty-two of them with 65 impalpable testes were treated laparoscopically – the study group. Mean age was 3.5 years. The study group was divided into 5 groups according to type of treatment. The volume and position of the operated gonad were assessed manually and by ultrasound.

Results

In group 1 testicular agenesis was observed in 19 patients. In group 2 revision of the inguinal canal revealed testicular agenesis in 7 and atrophy in 4 patients. In group 3 conversion to classic orchiopexy was performed in 10 patients. In group 4 one-stage orchiopexy was performed in 9 patients on 12 testes. In group 5 a two-stage F-S procedure was performed in 13 patients. Ten testes in group 4 had a volume in the normal range (84%) and also 10 testes in group 5 (77%).

Conclusions

Laparoscopy in impalpable testes is the procedure of choice and allows definitive management, even when conversion to open procedure is necessary. Sensitivity of preoperative ultrasound is generally about 60% for true intra-abdominal testes, so diagnostic laparoscopy is necessary.

Is inguinal orchidopexy still a current procedure in the treatment of intraabdominal testis in the era of laparoscopic surgery?

PURPOSE

To report our experience in surgical management of nonpalpable intraabdominal testis (NPIT) by inguinal orchidopexy without division of the spermatic vessels.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of NPIT patients who underwent orchidopexy between 2012 and 2015. All patients were evaluated ultrasonographically. When the testis was not detected ultrasonographically, a laparoscopic exploration was performed. If the testis was found on laparoscopy, surgery was resumed through an inguinal incision. A follow-up was performed at 1week, 1, 3 and 6months.

RESULTS

Twenty-one NPIT patients were treated, mean age 21.0±11.7months. Ultrasound identified 15 cases of NPIT (71%); diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 6 (29%). All patients underwent an inguinal orchidopexy. At 1week, four testes were in a high scrotal position. At 6months follow-up, one testis was in a high scrotal position and one retracted up to the external inguinal ring. No atrophy was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite several attempts to find a surgical technique without any significant complications, all described procedures failed to meet the target. In our experience, inguinal orchidopexy is a safe, reliable and successful surgical procedure for the management of NPIT. It should be preferred to a technique requiring vascular division, burdened with a higher incidence of atrophy.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Case series with no comparison group.

Staged Fowler-Stephens and Single-stage Laparoscopic Orchiopexy for Intra-abdominal Testes: Is There a Difference? A Single Institution Experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare single-stage laparoscopic orchiopexy (SSLO) and staged Fowler-Stephens (SFS) procedures in the management of intra-abdominal undescended testes, and to analyze postoperative atrophy and malpositioning as end points.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified laparoscopic orchiopexy patients with intra-abdominal testes between November 2006 and November 2014. Of 167 patients who had laparoscopic orchiopexy, 73 (85 testes) were identified as having laparoscopic orchiopexy. Baseline characteristics, as well as testicular scrotal position and size at follow-up, were recorded. Regression analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients who underwent SFS and SSLO.

RESULTS

Of the 85 laparoscopic orchiopexies, 35 underwent SFS and 50 had SSLO. Patient demographics were comparable in both groups. The median age at surgery was 12 months (5-151 months), and the average follow-up was 17.3 months. On follow-up, there were 0 recorded cases of SFS patients with abnormally positioned testes postoperatively, whereas there were 10 (20.0%) SSLO patients who had abnormally positioned testes (odds ratio: 0.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.44). Differences in atrophy rates were not significant.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that there may be no difference between the 2 approaches in terms of postoperative atrophy. However, the SFS appears to be more successful in securing a favorable scrotal position. Atrophy does not seem to be associated with other patient factors. Prospective, randomized studies are indicated to further explore outcome differences between the 2 approaches.

The undescended testis: Clinical management and scientific advances

Undescended testes (UDT), where one or both testes fail to migrate to the base of the scrotum, can be congenital (2-5% of newborn males) or acquired (1-2% of males). The testis may be found in any position along its usual line of descent. Cryptorchidism affects the developing testicular germ cells and increases the risk of infertility and malignancy. Clinical management aims to preserve spermatogenesis and prevent the increased risk of seminoma. Examination to document the testicular position will guide the need for imaging, medical management and the surgical approach to orchidopexy.

Laparoscopic orchiopexy and varicocelectomy: is there really an advantage?

The role of laparoscopy in the case of nonpalpable cryptorchidism is both diagnostic and therapeutic. Laparoscopic orchiopexy for nonpalpable testes in the pediatric population has become the preferred surgical approach among pediatric urologists over the last 20 years. In contrast, laparoscopic varicocelectomy is considered one of several possible approaches to the treatment of a varicocele in an adolescent; however, it has many challengers and it has not gained universal acceptance as the gold standard. This article reviews the published evidence regarding these surgical techniques.

Laparoscopy in the surgical management of the non-palpable testis

INTRODUCTION

To demonstrate that laparoscopic intervention should be considered as the initial surgical approach in the management of the non-palpable testis (NPT).

METHODS

From 2007 to 2011, 100 testicular units underwent same surgeon laparoscopic management for NPT. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in all NPT and intra-abdominal testes (IAT) were managed by laparoscopic orchiopexy if low, laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens technique if high, and laparoscopic orchiectomy if atrophic. Percutaneous access to the abdomen was performed in most cases and laparoscopic management was performed with three 5 mm ports. We compared patient's age, race, pre/post-operative exam, pre-operative work up, and IAT location upon laparoscopic intervention with surgical outcome. Fisher's exact test for two independent proportions was used for statistical analysis and reported our results.

RESULTS

One hundred testicular units underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for NPT. All patients were from Puerto Rican descent. 55.0% were found to be intra-abdominal and were subdivided into groups according to surgical intervention. Mean post-operative follow-up was 24 months. Patients 24 months of age or younger undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for NPT had a statistically significant probability of resulting in successful laparoscopic orchiopexy as opposed to laparoscopic orchiectomy due to an atrophied IAT (n = 55 testicular units, p < 0.05). No laparoscopic related complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the use of an initial laparoscopic approach in the NPT as the majority of these patients will have IAT, avoiding unnecessary inguinal and scrotal explorations. We also recommend that patients with IAT should undergo laparoscopic orchiopexy prior to 2 years of age to increase probability of successful management. Further studies focusing in patients with NPT are needed in the future to confirm our findings.

The intra-abdominal testis: lessons from the past, and ideas for the future

The intra-abdominal testis (IAT) has been always an enigma for both diagnosis and treatment. Imaging techniques are known for low sensitivity for localizing the IAT. It has been universally accepted that the gold standard for localizing the IAT is diagnostic laparoscopy. Orchiopexy techniques for IAT are complicated and attended with a higher rate of failure and complication than those for the palpable testis. For the low-lying abdominal testis, a one-stage procedure without interruption of the vessels has a high success rate. The Prentiss maneuver bridges the borders of normal pathway to gain a straighter course to the scrotum. The interruption of the main vascular supply of the testis, depending on collateral circulation, has been used for many years but with questionable effects on the microscopic delicate structure of the testis. Microvascular autotransplantation was intended to avoid this effect, but it is technically demanding and requires special expertise. The principle of traction has been used in the past but was abandoned due to high rate of atrophy. Recently, traction has been revisited with a new approach with very encouraging results. The key to success in any technique for orchiopexy is the complete absence of tension.

Laparoscopy-assisted orchiopexy versus laparoscopic two-stage fowler stephens orchiopexy for nonpalpable testes: Comparative study

Background/Purpose:

To assess the outcome of the primary laparoscopy-assisted orchiopexy (LAO) and the laparoscopic two-stage Fowler Stephens orchiopexy (FSO) for managing patients with nonpalpable testis in terms of safety, feasibility and efficacy.

Materials and Methods:

This study included 94 patients (110 nonpalpable testes) who underwent laparoscopy at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh between July 1998 and June 2012. Patients were evaluated postoperatively to check the location and size of testes and to exclude any other complications.

Results:

Mean age at presentation was 24+/−19 months (9-96 months). Orchiectomy was done for 5 atrophic testes. 36 open orchiopexy was done for 29 canalicular testes and 7 peeping testes. 35 LAO were done for 1 canalicular testis, 5 peeping testes, 16 low intraabdominal testes and 13 high intraabdominal testes. 34 FSO were done for 23 high intraabdominal testes, 9 low intraabdominal testes and 2 peeping testes. Median follow up was 12 months (1-84 months) and 6 patients were lost to follow up. The overall success rates for LAO and FSO were 88% and 63%, respectively. Overall testicular atrophy rates were 3% and 30% for LAO and FSO, respectively (OR 0.08 [95% CI, 0.01-0.69], P = 0.006). For high intraabdominal testes, the atrophy rates were 3% and 20% for LAO and FSO, respectively (OR 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-1.21, P = 0.049).Testicular displacement rates were 9% and 7% for LAO and FSO, respectively (OR 1.5, 95% CI, 0.24-9.59, P = 0.514).

Conclusions:

Laparoscopy provides a safe and accurate modality for diagnosing and managing patients with nonpalpable testes. LAO appears to be feasible and effective in management of high intraabdominal testes. Further well-conducted comparative studies are needed.

Laparoscopic management of intra-abdominal testis: 5-year single-centre experience-a retrospective descriptive study

Background. Undescended testis is one of the most common urological problems in children, affecting about 1% of boys at age of 1 year. Of these, about 20% have a nonpalpable testis with a very high probability that the testis is absent. This may have a significant impact on the possibility of malignancy in these testes, as well as on the later fertility of these subjects. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the demographic and clinical findings, as well as immediate and 6-month outcomes, in 91 patients diagnosed with impalpable undescended testes between January 2006 and December 2010. Results. Of the 91 patients, 9 had bilateral and 82 had unilateral impalpable testes. All 100 testes were managed laparoscopically. The largest group of intra-abdominal testes in this series, 42 testes, was entering the internal ring; in these, laparoscopic exploration and standard open orchiopexy resulted in a 66% success rate. The total success rate was 63.3%. Conclusion. Laparoscopy is extremely useful in both the diagnosis and treatment of impalpable testes. Objectively measured mobility of the testis towards the contralateral internal inguinal ring is an excellent intraoperative indicator for type of orchiopexy. Standardization of management may increase the success rate of orchiopexy.

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Nissen procedure in pediatric patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease measured using the modified QPSG Roma III European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition's questionnaire

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) represents the gold standard for surgical treatment for pediatric patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

We report the results of long-term outcome of 36 patients who had undergone LF from January to December 1998, with a follow-up longer than 10 years (range, 11-12 years). The patients were invited, by phone, to undergo a clinical follow-up. All patients underwent the modified European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)'s Roma III questionnaire; however, only 22 out of 36 patients accepted to be controlled in a day hospital setting, and 10 out of 36 accepted to undergo a telephonic questionnaire. Our study is focused on the data of these 32 patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight out of 32 (87.5%) patients had completely recovered; 4 out of 32 patients (12.5%) had a mild persistent GER; 9 out of 32 patients (28%) referred a mild dysphagia; 21 out of 32 (66%) patients could burp; and only 9 out of 32 (28%) patients could vomit. The cosmetic result was good in 30 out of 32 (94%) patients. The weight/height ratio was satisfactory in 28 out of 32 (87.5%) patients. The quality of life was good in 28 out of 32 (87.5%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that the long-term follow-up after LF produces a good clinical result and a good quality of life. The modified ESPGHAN's Roma III questionnaire seems an effective way to check the long-term results, because it avoids submitting patients to long and not well tolerated instrumental exams.

Diagnostic laparoscopy for the management of impalpable testes

PURPOSE

Controversy exists regarding the best approach to impalpable testes. We determined the usefulness of diagnostic laparoscopy for the management of impalpable testes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2000 and 2008, 86 patients with a mean age of 34 months underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. An inguinal canal exploration was performed in all cases, except in patients in whom the internal spermatic vessels terminated intraperitoneally with a blind end.

RESULTS

The undescended testis was right-sided in 24 patients (27.9%), left-sided in 47 patients (54.7%), and bilateral in 15 patients (17.4%). Three patients (3.5%) had bilateral impalpable testes. The vas and vessels traversed the internal ring in 51 of 89 impalpable testes (57.3%); 20 (22.5%) were localized intraperitoneally, and 18 (20.2%) were diagnosed as vanishing testes. Open orchiopexies were performed on 24 testes (27.0%) and orchiectomies were performed on 43 nubbin testes (48.3%). After a mean follow-up period of 30 months, 12 of the 14 testes (85.7%) were viable following open conventional orchiopexy, compared with 6 of the 10 testes (60%) following a 1-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic laparoscopy is a very helpful and minimally invasive technique in the diagnosis of impalpable testes, especially when preoperative ultrasonography is not sufficiently informative.

Laparoscopic orchiopexy for non-palpable testes: outcome of two techniques

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome of laparoscopic orchiopexy and the two-stage Fowler Stephens technique for managing patients with impalpable testis in terms of safety, feasibility and efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 78 patients who presented with 88 non-palpable testes to the outpatient clinic of Sohag university hospital in 2005-2009, and underwent laparoscopy by the same surgeon. Intra-abdominal testes were managed by laparoscopic orchiopexy if low, two-stage Fowler-Stephens technique if high, and orchiectomy if atrophic. Children were evaluated postoperatively to check the location and size of the testicle and to exclude any other complication.

RESULTS

Median age at presentation was 16 months (range 11-42 months). Four testes were absent while inguinal exploration was necessary for six testes with the vas entering the internal ring. Of the 78 intra-abdominal testes, 45 were identified as high (Fowler-Stephens in 43; orchiectomy in two atrophic testes) and 33 as low (orchiopexy). Follow up was 3-55 months (mean 34 months). Twelve patients (12 testes) were lost to follow up (7 Fowler-Stephens; 5 orchiopexy). On follow up, the testes were normal sized and well positioned in the scrotum in 28/28 and 32/36 testes in the orchiopexy and Fowler-Stephens groups with an overall success rate of 100% and 88.8%, respectively. Two testes showed testicular displacement and two showed testicular atrophy in patients of the Fowler-Stephens group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy provides a safe and accurate modality for diagnosing and managing patients with non-palpable testes, with excellent outcomes.

Is the Fowler-Stephens procedure still indicated for the treatment of nonpalpable intraabdominal testis?

PURPOSE

There are no formal guidelines for the management of boys with nonpalpable testis. In this article, we report our experience in treating all nonpalpable intraabdominal testis (NPIT) with standard inguinal orchidopexy without dividing the spermatic vessels stating that the Fowler-Stephens technique is no longer indicated for the treatment of the intraabdominal testis.

METHODS

Between June 2003 and April 2008, we treated 23 boys with NPIT confirmed by ultrasound or laparoscopy. All cases were treated through an inguinal orchidopexy without division of the spermatic vessels by fixing the testis to the scrotum by 2 absorbable stitches even if there was an upward retraction of the scrotal skin. Location and size of testis were reported at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months through physical examination.

RESULTS

Average age at presentation was 24 months. Ten patients (43%) had the NPIT on the right side, 8 (35%) on the left side, and 5 (22%) were bilateral. We had no intraoperative complications. All patients were discharged on the same day. In all cases, the testis was normal in size and found in the scrotum after 6 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our experience, we believe that the Fowler-Stephens procedure is not indicated anymore in the management of NPIT. Orchidopexy without division of the spermatic vessels should be the treatment of choice even for the cases of very high intraabdominal testis because it does not affect normal testicular vascularization and is minimally invasive.

Open versus laparoscopic staged Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy: impact of long loop vas

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of literature on factors associated with testicular atrophy following second stage laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy. We hypothesized that dissection of a long looping vas during this procedure could compromise testicular blood supply, leading to testicular atrophy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following an initial laparoscopic testicular vessel ligation, a second stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy was performed in 73 testes (laparoscopic in 61, open in 12). The presence of a long looping vas was noted from the first stage operative notes. Doppler ultrasound was performed postoperatively to confirm testicular atrophy.

RESULTS

Atrophy rate at a mean followup of 13.5 months was 20.5% (15 of 61 in laparoscopic and 0 of 12 in open orchiopexy). None of the 5 long looping vas testes atrophied following open orchiopexy, compared to 5 of 6 (83%) following laparoscopic orchiopexy (p = 0.03). Analyzing the laparoscopic group alone, a long looping vas was significantly associated with risk of atrophy (p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a long looping vas was associated with a higher atrophy rate following laparoscopic second stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy. Laparoscopic management of the long looping vas may be more challenging and, therefore, in such cases open Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy may result in better success rates by preserving the integrity of the collateral vessels.

Bladder injuries during laparoscopic orchiopexy: incidence and lessons learned

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic orchiopexy is a safe operation. However, the bladder can be injured during creation of the transperitoneal tunnel for the cryptorchid testis. We reviewed our experience with this complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the operative notes of patients who had undergone laparoscopic orchiopexy between August 15, 2002 and October 1, 2008, and identified bladder injuries and their treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients underwent laparoscopic orchiopexies for 101 undescended testes during the study interval, with 3 procedures resulting in bladder injuries. The 3 operations varied with regard to whether the injury was recognized intraoperatively or postoperatively, and repaired in an open or laparoscopic fashion.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder injury during laparoscopic orchiopexy is a rare but serious complication that can be managed by an open or laparoscopic approach. We recommend placement of a urethral catheter and syringe assisted drainage of all urine from the bladder at the beginning of the operation, careful perivesical dissection particularly in children with prior inguinal surgery, filling and emptying of the bladder during the procedure, and maintaining a high index of suspicion especially when hematuria is observed.

Management of boys with nonpalpable undescended testis

Cryptorchidism is one of the most common genitourinary disorders in young boys. Although the management of boys with palpable testis is standardized, there are no formal guidelines for the management of boys with nonpalpable testis. In this Review we look at the current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of this disorder, as well as the indications for therapy and surgical procedures. On the basis of current evidence, we find that there is no optimum orchidopexy technique for the treatment of intra-abdominal testis, although it is preferable to adopt techniques that preserve the spermatic vessels. We also briefly examine the follow-up of patients with this disorder and its common complications. As yet, there are no data that assess the potential of laparoscopic orchidopexy being a risk factor for impaired fertility later in life.

Results of orchiopexy for the undescended testis

The undescended testis is one of the most common congenital abnormalities of the genitourinary system. Outcomes of orchiopexy include (1) having a viable, palpable testis in the scrotum, (2) fertility, as measured by paternity rates or semen analysis in adulthood and (3) risk of testicular cancer. Multiple operative techniques have been described and are associated with various success rates. In the past decade, success of orchiopexy for inguinal testes has been >95%. For abdominal testes, success for orchiopexy has been >85-90% in most series with single stage orchiopexy or two stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy, both with open surgical or laparoscopic technique. However, having a palpable testis in the scrotum does not assure fertility, as there are iatrogenic factors that may adversely affect the outcome. In adult men with a history of unilateral orchiopexy, fertility is nearly normal, but is significantly reduced following bilateral orchiopexy. The risk of testicular carcinoma is increased by a factor of 3.7 to 7.5 times. Tumor type is most commonly seminoma if the testis is undescended, whereas tumors that occur following orchiopexy are much more likely to be nonseminomatous.

Laparoscopy vs inguinal exploration for nonpalpable undescended testis

OBJECTIVE

The optimal initial surgical approach for nonpalpable undescended testis (UDT) is debated. The aim of the present study is to compare the results of initial laparoscopy and inguinal exploration in the management of unilateral nonpalpable undescended testes.

METHODS

The results of 20 children with unilateral nonpalpable UDT managed by initial laparoscopy (group I) were compared with 20 age-matched children managed by inguinal exploration (group II). The location of testes and results of orchiopexy were compared in both groups. A single surgeon performed all the operative procedures.

RESULTS

The majority of testes (16/20 group I, 17/20 group II) in both groups were canalicular or low abdominal. Vanishing testes accounted for one-third (13/40) of the testes, the majority (85%) of which were located in the inguinal canal. All children were discharged within 24 hours of the operation. The success of orchiopexy at 4-6 weeks post-operatively was 85% and 86% in the two groups respectively. Retrospectively, only 7/40 (18%) of the testes would benefit from laparoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial laparoscopic and inguinal approaches to nonpalpable UDT give comparable results. This report failed to demonstrate any specific advantage of initial laparoscopy in the majority of children with unilateral nonpalpable UDT.

Prepubertal unilateral spermatic vessel ligation decreases haploid cell population of ipsilateral testis postpubertally in rats

DNA flow cytometry is a sensitive and rapid technique to evaluate the germ cell maturation of testis. The haploid cell population of testis specifically denotes testicular maturation. High ligation of spermatic vessels (HLSV) and low ligation of spermatic vessels (LLSV) have been described in the surgical treatment of high undescended testis. Estimation of germ cell population of testis after these maneuvers has not been performed so far by DNA flow cytometry; hence this study was designed. Thirty male rats, aged 30 days, were randomized into three groups. Group I underwent sham surgery; group II underwent unilateral HLSV-ligation and division of main spermatic vessels, similar to the Fowler-Stephens technique; and group III underwent unilateral LLSV-ligation and division of main spermatic vessels close to the testis, similar to the Koff and Sethi technique. Thirty days later, the ipsilateral testes were harvested, and haploid, diploid, and tetraploid cells were counted by DNA flow cytometry. The mean (+/-SD) percentage of the haploid cell population was 68.7+/-4.8, 49.3+/-6.5, and 50.8+/-6.4 in groups I, II, and III, respectively. There was a significant (p<0.05) decrease in haploid cell population between groups I and II and between groups I and III. However, there was no significant difference between groups II and III. In conclusion, prepubertal HLSV as well as LLSV decreases the haploid cell population of ipsilateral testis in rats. LLSV has no advantage over HLSV.

Laparoscopic Reconstructive Urology

PURPOSE

Although laparoscopy has emerged as a feasible and effective alternative for a majority of open ablative abdominopelvic urological procedures, minimally invasive reconstruction has come to the forefront only recently. We present the current state of the art of laparoscopic reconstructive urology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an extensive MEDLINE search of purely laparoscopic surgery from 1976 through 2002. Based on the results, we divide clinical reconstructive laparoscopic procedures into 2 broad categories-established and evolving. Each category is further classified according to the organ involved-adrenal and kidney, ureter (evolving only), bladder and prostate, and miscellaneous. Clinical procedures were considered established if our literature review revealed any report of more than 100 patients, or reports from at least 5 different centers greater than 20 patients each. If these criteria were not met, the procedure was considered clinically evolving.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty, radical prostatectomy and orchiopexy have achieved clinically established status. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension, although reported in a significant number of cases, remains controversial because of its contradictory reported long-term success rates. Multiple additional laparoscopic reconstructive procedures have been performed in fewer numbers clinically with promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

Until recently, urological laparoscopic surgery primarily focused on ablative procedures, with success. Building on this initial experience, advanced and sophisticated reconstructive procedures of considerable technical complexity are increasingly being performed purely laparoscopically. It is anticipated that in the future laparoscopic surgery could increasingly evolve into a preferred approach for advanced and sophisticated urological reconstruction.

Impact of laparoscopy on the management of an unusual case of nonpalpable testis in an adult patient

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, cryptorchidism has generally been treated in the first 36 months of life using an inguinal approach, in the case of palpable testis, or using laparoscopy, in the case of nonpalpable testis. Nevertheless, before this period some children were managed incorrectly. This case report shows how laparoscopy and the collaboration between pediatric surgeons and urologists may lead to optimal results.

CASE REPORT

A 19-year-old male was referred to our unit following routine medical examination for enrollment in the military service with a diagnosis of right cryptorchidism. The clinical history showed the anamnesis of right cryptorchidism diagnosed at birth as a right nonpalpable testis, confirmed at 2 years of age with clinical examination and computer tomography. The patient came to our attention to again undergo a clinical examination, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. We found a left, well-positioned testis of 20 ml in volume and an empty right scrotum; all the instrumental examinations were negative. The patient was thus scheduled for a diagnostic laparoscopy. A pediatric surgeon with extensive experience in this pathology performed the procedure. The 10-mm 30 degrees optics introduced through the umbilicus showed a closed right inguinal ring, with no evidence of either vas deferens or inner spermatic vessels at the level of the inguinal region or pelvis. Two more trocars were introduced and a testis of 15 ml in volume was found under the ascending colon 10 cm away from the cecum. An orchiectomy was performed via laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION

This case clearly shows that some males with nonpalpable testis may have been treated incorrectly in the prelaparoscopic era and may now have an intraabdominal testis. In addition, our experience shows that intraabdominal testis may sometime be in an unusual location, and a laparoscopic surgeon with experience in this pathology is fundamental to finding the testis. In the case of adults with nonpalpable testis, when echography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are not useful, the only effective diagnostic procedure is laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic management of the undescended testicle

The role of laparoscopy with regards to the undescended testicle has been hotly debated since the late 1970s and early 1980s when it was realized that the abdominal testicle could be visualized with the laparoscope. Many enthusiastically embraced the laparoscope for diagnosis and localization of the impalpable undescended testicle, whereas others staunchly maintained that laparoscopy was overly invasive and really facilitated little with regards to orchidopexy. Diagnostic laparoscopy, when compared with the other modalities, holds its own well with regards to accuracy and efficacy. In the early 1990s, the role of laparoscopy expanded to include performance of orchidopexy. It would be naive to believe that the debate cooled with the evolution of laparoscopic orchidopexy. Over the years, since introduction of the operation, there have been many institutions that have examined the role of laparoscopic orchidopexy quite critically. In many people's minds, laparoscopic orchidopexy is a clear competitor to open orchidopexy for the impalpable undescended abdominal testicle; in a few people's minds, it has become the gold standard.