Metabolic status in diabetes mellitus affects markers for glomerular filtration rate

Comparison of estimated GFR using cystatin C versus creatinine in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

An accurate, rapid estimate of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in kidney transplant patients affords early detection of transplant deterioration and timely intervention. This study compared the performance of serum creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (CysC)-based GFR equations to measured GFR (mGFR) using iohexol among pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

CysC, Cr, and mGFR were obtained from 45 kidney transplant patients, 1-18 years old. Cr- and CysC-estimated GFR (eGFR) was compared against mGFR using the Cr-based (Bedside Schwartz, U25-Cr), CysC-based (Gentian CysC, CAPA, U25-CysC), and Cr-CysC combination (CKiD Cr-CysC, U25 Cr-CysC) equations in terms of bias, precision, and accuracy. Bland-Altman plots assessed the agreement between eGFR and mGFR. Secondary analyses evaluated the formulas in patients with biopsy-proven histological changes, and K/DOQI CKD staging.

RESULTS

Bias was small with Gentian CysC (0.1 ml/min/1.73 m2); 88.9% and 37.8% of U25-CysC estimations were within 30% and 10% of mGFR, respectively. In subjects with histological changes on biopsy, Gentian CysC had a small bias and U25-CysC were more accurate-both with 83.3% of and 41.7% of estimates within 30% and 10% mGFR, respectively. Precision was better with U25-CysC, CKiD Cr-CysC, and U25 Cr-CysC. Bland-Altman plots showed the Bedside Schwartz, Gentian CysC, CAPA, and U25-CysC tend to overestimate GFR when > 100 ml/min/1.72 m2. CAPA misclassified CKD stage the least (whole cohort 24.4%, histological changes on biopsy 33.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small cohort, CysC-based equations with or without Cr may have better bias, precision, and accuracy in predicting GFR.

Correlation between cystatin C-based formulas, Schwartz formula and urinary creatinine clearance for glomerular filtration rate estimation in children with kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is an important tool for monitoring renal function.

OBJECTIVES

Regarding to limitations in available methods, we intended to calculate GFR by cystatin C (Cys C) based formulas and determine correlation rate of them with current methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 72 children (38 boys and 34 girls) with renal disorders. The 24 hour urinary creatinine (Cr) clearance was the gold standard method. GFR was measured with Schwartz formula and Cys C-based formulas (Grubb, Hoek, Larsson and Simple). Then correlation rates of these formulas were determined.

RESULTS

Using Pearson correlation coefficient, a significant positive correlation between all formulas and the standard method was seen (R(2) for Schwartz, Hoek, Larsson, Grubb and Simple formula was 0.639, 0.722, 0.705, 0.712, 0.722, respectively) (P<0.001). Cys C-based formulas could predict the variance of standard method results with high power. These formulas had correlation with Schwarz formula by R(2) 0.62-0.65 (intermediate correlation). Using linear regression and constant (y-intercept), it revealed that Larsson, Hoek and Grubb formulas can estimate GFR amounts with no statistical difference compared with standard method; but Schwartz and Simple formulas overestimate GFR.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that Cys C-based formulas have strong relationship with 24 hour urinary Cr clearance. Hence, they can determine GFR in children with kidney injury, easier and with enough accuracy. It helps the physician to diagnosis of renal disease in early stages and improves the prognosis.

Utility of cystatin C for renal function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

Creatinine (Cr) as a marker of renal function has limited value in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) because patients with ALS have reduced muscle mass. Thus, there is a need for alternative methods of assessing renal function. Cystatin C (CysC), which is unaffected by muscle mass, is potentially an ideal biomarker of nephrotoxicity in ALS; however, its utility requires validation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and six subjects were recruited for the study: 76 ALS patients and 30 healthy controls. We compared the Cr-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the CysC-based eGFR in the ALS patients and healthy controls. The results were further analysed according to the severity of ALS in the patients.

RESULTS

The mean Cr-based eGFRs were 257.2 ± 383.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the ALS group and 98.1 ± 34.9 in the control group; however, the mean CysC-based eGFRs were not significantly different between both groups. Thus, the Cr-based eGFR in the ALS group was markedly higher than any of the other values. Although serum CysC levels did not correlate with the severity of ALS according to the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, strong simple correlations were observed between serum Cr levels and the severity of ALS (correlation coefficient = 0.734, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the potential usefulness of CysC as a biomarker of renal function in ALS patients. Furthermore, its applicability could be extended to other neuromuscular diseases.

Serum cystatin C is a poor biomarker for diagnosing acute kidney injury in critically-ill children

Background:

Accurate diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) is problematic especially in critically-ill patients in whom renal function is in an unsteady state.

Aim:

Our aim was to evaluate the role of serum (S.) cystatin C as an early biomarker of AKI in critically-ill children.

Subjects and Methods:

S. creatinine and S. cystatin C were measured in 32 critically-ill children who were at risk for developing AKI. AKI was defined by both: Risk,-injury,-failure,-loss, and-endstage renal disease (RIFLE) classification and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <80 ml/min/1.73 m². GFR was estimated by both Schwartz formula and S. cystatin C-based equation.

Results:

S. cystatin C was not statistically higher in AKI patients compared with non-AKI by RIFLE classification (median 1.48 mg/l vs. 1.16 mg/l, P = 0.1) while S. creatinine was significantly higher (median 0.8 mg/dl vs. 0.4 mg/dl, P = 0.001). On estimating GFR by the two equations we found, a lag between rise of S. cystatin C and creatinine denoted by lower GFR by Schwartz formula in four patients, on other hand, six patients had elevated S. cystatin C with low GFR despite normal creatinine and GFR, denoting poor concordance between the two equations and the two markers. The ability of S. creatinine in predicting AKI was superior to S. cystatin with area under the curve (AUC) 0.95 with sensitivity and specificity (100% and 84.6%, respectively) using the RIFLE classification. The same findings were found when using Schwartz formula.

Conclusion:

S. cystatin C is a poor biomarker for diagnosing AKI in critically-ill children.

Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents

GFR is the best indicator of renal function in children and adolescents and is critical for diagnosing acute and chronic kidney impairment, intervening early to prevent end-stage renal failure, prescribing nephrotoxic drugs and drugs cleared by a failing kidney, and monitoring for side effects of medications. Renal inulin clearance was the gold standard for GFR but is compromised by lack of availability, difficult assays, and problems of collecting timed urine samples, especially in children with vesicoureteral reflux or bladder dysfunction. Creatinine clearance-based estimates of GFR are often used in pediatrics. The addition of cimetidine to eliminate creatinine secretion permits accurate measurement of GFR in those who can completely empty their bladders to provide timed urine collections. Radioisotopes are used in plasma disappearance GFR determinations; however, these are not ideal for use in children, especially for repeated studies. The plasma disappearance of iohexol serves as a promising alternative GFR marker, because it is safe and not radioactive, easily measured, not metabolized or transported by the kidney, and excreted primarily by glomerular filtration. GFR estimating equations, based on serum concentrations of creatinine or cystatin C, are popular clinically and in research studies. Efforts are ongoing to improve these estimating equations for children and make the results readily available to clinicians obtaining standard chemistry profiles, as is being done for adults. However, at this time, there is no dependable substitute for an accurately determined GFR, and iohexol plasma disappearance offers the best combination of safety, accuracy, and reproducible precision.

Utility of cystatin C to monitor renal function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Creatinine as a marker of renal function has limited value in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) because of reduced muscle mass. Alternative methods of assessing renal function are sorely needed. Cystatin C, a nonglycosylated protein unaffected by muscle mass, is potentially an ideal biomarker of nephrotoxicity for this population but requires validation. In all, 75 subjects were recruited: 35 DMD (mean age 10.8 +/- 5.4 years, corticosteroids n = 19, ambulatory n = 26), 29 healthy controls, 10 with renal disease, and one DMD with renal failure. Cystatin C levels in DMD were normal irrespective of age, ambulation, or corticosteroid treatment. Serum cystatin C was 0.67 +/- 0.11 mg/l compared to normal controls 0.69 +/- 0.09. mg/l. In these same individuals serum creatinine was severely reduced (0.27 +/- 0.12 mg/dl) versus normals (0.75 +/- 0.15 mg/dl, P < 0.01). In one DMD subject in renal failure, cystatin C was elevated. This study demonstrates the potential value of cystatin C as a biomarker for monitoring renal function in DMD. Its applicability extends to other neuromuscular diseases.

Measuring glomerular filtration rate in children; can cystatin C replace established methods? A review

Our aim was to evaluate published methods that use serum cystatin C (s-CysC) for measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children and to discuss advantages and limitations of s-CysC and of established GFR methods. A comprehensive literature review of clinical studies in children evaluating s-CysC or CysC-based formulas and plasma creatinine or creatinine-based formulas against an exogenous reference method using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves or Bland-Altman plots is presented. The comparison of s-CysC with plasma creatinine indicated that s-CysC was superior to plasma creatinine in five of 13 studies; four studies showed no difference, and, in four studies, no statistical comparison was made. Comparison of s-CysC and the Schwartz formula showed that s-CysC was superior to the Schwartz formula in two of seven studies; two studies demonstrated no difference, and, in one study, the Schwartz formula was superior to s-CysC. In two studies no statistical comparison was made. The CysC-based prediction equations all had high accuracy but low agreement when compared with a reference GFR, in the range of 30-40% at best. S-CysC is most likely superior to plasma creatinine and at least equal to creatinine-based formulas. CysC-based prediction equations are at least as good as creatinine-based formulas but cannot replace exogenous methods.

New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD

The Schwartz formula was devised in the mid-1970s to estimate GFR in children. Recent data suggest that this formula currently overestimates GFR as measured by plasma disappearance of iohexol, likely a result of a change in methods used to measure creatinine. Here, we developed equations to estimate GFR using data from the baseline visits of 349 children (aged 1 to 16 yr) in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) cohort. Median iohexol-GFR (iGFR) was 41.3 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (interquartile range 32.0 to 51.7), and median serum creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl. We performed linear regression analyses assessing precision, goodness of fit, and accuracy to develop improvements in the GFR estimating formula, which was based on height, serum creatinine, cystatin C, blood urea nitrogen, and gender. The best equation was: GFR(ml/min per 1.73 m(2))=39.1[height (m)/Scr (mg/dl)](0.516) x [1.8/cystatin C (mg/L)](0.294)[30/BUN (mg/dl)](0.169)[1.099](male)[height (m)/1.4](0.188). This formula yielded 87.7% of estimated GFR within 30% of the iGFR, and 45.6% within 10%. In a test set of 168 CKiD patients at 1 yr of follow-up, this formula compared favorably with previously published estimating equations for children. Furthermore, with height measured in cm, a bedside calculation of 0.413*(height/serum creatinine), provides a good approximation to the estimated GFR formula. Additional studies of children with higher GFR are needed to validate these formulas for use in screening all children for CKD.

Biochemistry and Clinical Role of Human Cystatin C

Low molecular-mass plasma proteins play a key role in health and disease. Cystatin C is an endogenous cysteine proteinase inhibitor belonging to the type 2 cystatin superfamily. The mature, active form of human cystatin C is a single non-glycosylated polypeptide chain consisting of 120 amino acid residues, with a molecular mass of 13,343-13,359 Da, and containing four characteristic disulfide-paired cysteine residues. Human cystatin C is encoded by the CST3 gene, ubiquitously expressed at moderate levels. Cystatin C monomer is present in all human body fluids; it is preferentially abundant in cerebrospinal fluid, seminal plasma, and milk. Cystatin C L68Q variant is an amyloid fibril-forming protein with a high tendency to dimerize. It forms self-aggregates with massive amyloid deposits in the brain arteries of young adults, leading to lethal cerebral hemorrhage. The main catabolic site of cystatin C is the kidney: more than 99% of the protein is cleared from the circulation by glomerular ultrafiltration and tubular reabsorption. The diagnostic value of cystatin C as a marker of kidney dysfunction has been extensively investigated in multiple clinical studies on adults, children, and in the elderly. In almost all the clinical studies, cystatin C demonstrated a better diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine in discriminating normal from impaired kidney function, but controversial results have been obtained by comparing this protein with other indices of kidney disease, especially serum creatinine-based equations. In this review, we present and discuss most of the available data from the literature, critically reviewing conclusions and suggestions for the use of cystatin C in clinical practice. Despite the multitude of clinical data in the literature, cystatin C has not been widely used, perhaps because of a combination of factors, such as a general diffidence among clinicians, the absence of definitive cut-off values, conflicting results in clinical studies, no clear evidence on when and how to request the test, the poor commutability of results, and no accurate examination of costs and of its routine use in a stat laboratory.

How to monitor renal function in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

The aim is to review the tools for early detection of renal dysfunction after pediatric solid organ transplantation. Currently, the most widely used marker for detection of renal dysfunction involves measurement of GFR. Inulin clearance forms the "gold standard" method for measuring GFR; however, nuclear medicine methods ((51)Cr EDTA and (99)Tc DTPA isotope clearance studies) have replaced inulin clearance. The measurement of serum creatinine has a low sensitivity for the early detection of renal damage. The Schwartz formula using patient height and serum creatinine requires center-specific constants and has limitations associated with creatinine determination. These limitations may be overcome using a cystatin C-based GFR estimation. In diabetic nephropathy, and more recently in hemolytic uremic syndrome, microalbuminuria has been established as a useful screening tool for renal damage, while its predictive value in the transplantation setting needs to be established. All transplant recipients should be screened for hypertension. Early referral for ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring and involvement of pediatric nephrologists should be considered. All pediatric solid organ transplant recipients receiving CNI should be screened regularly for high blood pressure and early evidence of renal damage using either GFR scans or cystatin C-based GFR estimations.

Glomerular filtration rate via plasma iohexol disappearance: pilot study for chronic kidney disease in children

To guide the design of a nation-wide cohort study of chronic kidney disease in children, we determined how iohexol plasma disappearance curves could be used in children to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Iohexol (5 ml) was administered intravenously and blood samples were obtained at 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 240, 300, and 360 min after injection (N=29) and assayed by high performance liquid chromatography. Four urines were also collected following the injection. Intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) in serum was 1.3% at 100 mg/l, 2.6% at 15 mg/l, and 3.4% for duplicate unknowns. GFR(9) was computed from iohexol dose and area under the nine-point blood disappearance curve, using double exponential modeling. Only 2.8% of 254 data points deviated by >3 CV from the curves. GFR(4) calculated from 10, 30, 120, and 300 min points correlated well with GFR(9) (r=0.999) and showed no bias (means+/-s.d. of GFR(9) and GFR(4)=59.3+/-36.3 and 59.4+/-36.0 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). Relationship of GFR(9) and one-compartment GFR followed quadratic equation as previously reported by Brochner-Mortensen, allowing GFR to be calculated from 120 and 300 min points. This GFR(2) correlated well with GFR(9) (r=0.986). Estimated GFR from Schwartz height/creatinine formula correlated with GFR(9)(r=0.934) but overestimated GFR by 12.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Urine iohexol clearance was poorly correlated (r=0.770) with GFR(9) owing to variability in urine collections (median CV=24%). GFR can be measured accurately using four-point iohexol plasma disappearance (in most cases, two points suffice); estimated GFR and urinary clearances are less useful.

Derivation and Validation of Cystatin C–Based Prediction Equations for GFR in Children

BACKGROUND

Cystatin C (CysC) may be a better marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than serum creatinine (SCr) level. Few studies derived CysC-based GFR prediction equations for children. Objectives of this study are to: (1) derive CysC-based GFR prediction equations for children, and (2) compare these equations with published formulae.

METHODS

Patients younger than 18 years undergoing iothalamate GFR (IoGFR) testing were studied prospectively. Data collected were age, sex, CysC level, SCr level, IoGFR, height, weight, and diagnosis. By using linear regression, 2 equations were derived and compared with 3 previously published formulae by using Bland-Altman analysis and diagnostic characteristics. Local coefficients were derived for comparison formulae.

RESULTS

There were 111 GFR tests from 103 patients (age, 12.7 +/- 4.7 years; IoGFR, 73.6 +/- 35.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) [1.23 +/- 0.60 mL/s/1.73 m(2)]; 60% male; and 25% post-renal transplantation). The 2 equations derived were the CysEq (including CysC level) and the CysCrEq (including CysC and SCr levels). Overall, the 2 new equations had bias and precision similar to previously published formulae when local coefficients were used. However, in patients with a renal transplant or spina bifida, the 2 new equations were less biased and more precise. All CysC-based equations performed better than the Schwartz formula.

CONCLUSION

This study provides 2 CysC-based GFR prediction equations that are accurate, precise, and sensitive for detecting abnormal GFRs. Three previously published CysC GFR prediction equations have been validated for the first time. Prediction equations based on CysC level are likely to provide more accurate estimates of GFR than SCr-based equations.