Weight or body surface area dosing of steroids in nephrotic syndrome: is there an outcome difference?

Managing Lupus Nephritis in Children and Adolescents

Lupus nephritis is an important manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, which leads to chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, and can result in mortality. About 35%-60% of children with systemic lupus erythematosus develop kidney involvement. Over the past few decades, the outcome of patients with lupus nephritis has improved significantly with advances in immunosuppressive therapies and clinical management. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of high-level evidence to guide the management of childhood-onset lupus nephritis, because of the relatively small number of patients at each centre and also because children and adolescents are often excluded from clinical trials. Children and adults differ in more ways than just size, and there are remarkable differences between childhood- and adult-onset lupus nephritis in terms of disease severity, treatment efficacy, tolerance to medications and most importantly, psychosocial perspective. In this article, we review the 'art and science' of managing childhood-onset lupus nephritis, which has evolved in recent years, and highlight special considerations in this specific patient population.

Current Understanding of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

Nephrotic syndrome in children is mostly idiopathic in origin. About 90% of patients respond to corticosteroids; 80-90% have at least one relapse and 3-10% become corticosteroid resistant after the initial response. A kidney biopsy is seldom indicated for diagnosis except in patients with atypical presentation or corticosteroid resistance. For those in remission, the risk of relapse is reduced by the administration of daily low dose corticosteroids for 5-7 days at the onset of an upper respiratory infection. Some patients may continue having relapses through adult life. Many country-specific practice guidelines have been published, which are very similar with clinically insignificant differences.

Optimizing the corticosteroid dose in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

The use of corticosteroids in the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic (SSNS) syndrome in children has evolved surprisingly slowly since the ISKDC consensus over 50 years ago. From a move towards longer courses of corticosteroid to treat the first episode in the 1990s and 2000s, more recent large, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have unequivocally shown no benefit from an extended course, although doubt remains whether this applies across all age groups. With regard to prevention of relapses, daily ultra-low-dose prednisolone has recently been shown to be more effective than low-dose alternate-day prednisolone. Daily low-dose prednisolone for a week at the time of acute viral infection seems to be effective in the prevention of relapses but the results of a larger RCT are awaited. Recently, corticosteroid dosing to treat relapses has been questioned, with data suggesting lower doses may be as effective. The need for large RCTs to address the question of whether corticosteroid doses can be reduced was the conclusion of the authors of the recent corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children Cochrane update. This review summarizes development in thinking on corticosteroid use in SSNS and makes suggestions for areas that merit further scrutiny.

Daily low-dose prednisolone to prevent relapse of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children with an upper respiratory tract infection: PREDNOS2 RCT

Background

Most children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome have relapses that are triggered by upper respiratory tract infections. Four small trials, mostly in children already taking maintenance corticosteroid in countries of different upper respiratory tract infection epidemiology, showed that giving daily low-dose prednisone/prednisolone for 5–7 days during an upper respiratory tract infection reduces the risk of relapse.

Objectives

To determine if these findings were replicated in a large UK population of children with relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome on different background medication or none.

Design

A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, including a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Setting

A total of 122 UK paediatric departments, of which 91 recruited patients.

Participants

A total of 365 children with relapsing steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (mean age 7.6 ± 3.5 years) were randomised (1 : 1) according to a minimisation algorithm based on background treatment. Eighty children completed 12 months of follow-up without an upper respiratory tract infection. Thirty-two children were withdrawn from the trial (14 prior to an upper respiratory tract infection), leaving a modified intention-to-treat analysis population of 271 children (134 and 137 children in the prednisolone and placebo arms, respectively).

Interventions

At the start of an upper respiratory tract infection, children received 6 days of prednisolone (15 mg/m2) or an equivalent dose of placebo.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the incidence of first upper respiratory tract infection-related relapse following any upper respiratory tract infection over 12 months. The secondary outcomes were the overall rate of relapse, changes in background treatment, cumulative dose of prednisolone, rates of serious adverse events, incidence of corticosteroid adverse effects, change in Achenbach Child Behaviour Checklist score and quality of life. Analysis was by intention-to-treat principle. The cost-effectiveness analysis used trial data and a decision-analytic model to estimate quality-adjusted life-years and costs at 1 year, which were then extrapolated over 16 years.

Results

There were 384 upper respiratory tract infections and 82 upper respiratory tract infection-related relapses in the prednisolone arm, and 407 upper respiratory tract infections and 82 upper respiratory tract infection-related relapses in the placebo arm. The number of patients experiencing an upper respiratory tract infection-related relapse was 56 (42.7%) and 58 (44.3%) in the prednisolone and placebo arms, respectively (adjusted risk difference –0.024, 95% confidence interval –0.14 to 0.09; p = 0.70). There was no evidence that the treatment effect differed when data were analysed according to background treatment. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between treatment arms. Giving daily prednisolone at the time of an upper respiratory tract infection was associated with increased quality-adjusted life-years (0.9427 vs. 0.9424) and decreased average costs (£252 vs. £254), when compared with standard care. The cost saving was driven by background therapy and hospitalisations after relapse. The finding was robust to sensitivity analysis.

Limitations

A larger number of children than expected did not have an upper respiratory tract infection and the sample size attrition rate was adjusted accordingly during the trial.

Conclusions

The clinical analysis indicated that giving 6 days of daily low-dose prednisolone at the time of an upper respiratory tract infection does not reduce the risk of relapse of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in UK children. However, there was an economic benefit from costs associated with background therapy and relapse, and the health-related quality-of-life impact of having a relapse.

Future work

Further work is needed to investigate the clinical and health economic impact of relapses, interethnic differences in treatment response, the effect of different corticosteroid regimens in treating relapses, and the pathogenesis of individual viral infections and their effect on steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10900733 and EudraCT 2012-003476-39.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome with two steroid dosing regimens - one-year observational study

Introduction

The aim of the study was to compare the first year of disease in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) treated according to two prednisone dosing regimens: a weight-based schedule (2 mg/kg/24 h in the 1^st month, 2 mg/kg/48 h in the 2^nd month, with dose tapering during the following 4 months), and a body surface area (BSA)-based schedule (60 mg/m²/24 h in the 1^st month, 40 mg/m²/48 h in the 2^nd month, with dose tapering during the following 4 months).

Material and methods

In 2 groups of children treated with weight- and BSA-based regimens (20 patients, 3.13 ±1.01 years, treated in 2010-2013 and 20 patients, 5.13 ±2.86 years, treated in 2014-2016) clinical and anthropometrical parameters, number of INS relapses, total prednisone dose (mg/kg/year), and steroid adverse effects were compared during the first year of disease.

Results

Children treated with the weight-based steroid regimen received a higher total annual prednisone dose (259.06 ±79.54 vs. 185.83 ±72.67 mg/kg/24 h, p = 0.004) and had a shorter (though not significantly) period without prednisone (38.25 ±55.83 vs. 75.90 ±73.06 days, p = 0.062) compared to patients treated with the BSA-based regimen. There was no difference in number of relapses between groups (2.20 ±1.64 vs. 1.60 ±1.67, p = 0.190) but more patients relapsed in the weight-based group (19/20 vs. 13/20, p = 0.044). No differences in Z-score values of height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were observed. No steroid-related adverse events were noted except for arterial hypertension (4/20 vs. 5/20 patients, p = 1.000).

Conclusions

The BSA-based regimen of prednisone dosing in children with INS reduces exposure to steroids and risk of relapse, as well as increases days off steroids in the first year compared to the weight-based regimen with a high second-month dose.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

JUSTIFICATION

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

OBJECTIVE

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

PROCESS

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

Justification

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

Objective

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

Process

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

Recommendations

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.

Efficacy of body weight vs body surface area-based prednisolone regimen in nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prednisolone dosing regimen based on body surface area (BSA) or body weight (BW) in managing uncomplicated nephrotic syndrome (NS) has been a matter of controversy.

METHODS

In this parallel-arm randomized clinical trial, 60 children with uncomplicated NS in relapse were randomized to receive either of two regimens. Children of BW cohort received prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) till remission (or 6 weeks for first episode); followed by 1.5 mg/kg on alternate days for 4 weeks (or 6 weeks for first episode). Children randomized for BSA cohort received prednisolone (60 mg/m²/day) till remission (or 6 week for first episode); followed by 40 mg/m² on alternate days for 4 weeks (or 6 weeks for first episode). The primary endpoint was 6-month relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (clinical trial registry of India CTRI/2015/03/005655).

RESULTS

The 6-month relapse-free survival rates were similar for both BSA cohort 73.33% (22/30) and BW cohort 70% (21/30) (p = 1, OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.52). Requirement of cumulative steroid to achieve initial remission (96.1 ± 57.8 vs 63.58 ± 40.2 mg/kg, p = 0.014) and over 6-month study period (104.34 ± 50.82 vs 73.88 ± 42.95 mg/kg, p = 0.015) were significantly higher in BSA cohort in comparison to BW cohort. However, time taken in achieving remission during enrolment episode in both BSA and BW groups was comparable (7 ± 1.7 vs 6.9 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.81). While both treatments were well tolerated, the number of adverse events was one and half times as common in the BSA group than BW group (37 vs. 22 events).

CONCLUSIONS

In treating children with uncomplicated NS, both BSA and BW regimens were equally effective in achieving initial remission and maintaining disease remission. Due to fewer adverse events and lesser cumulative steroid exposure with BW based regimen, it may be considered as better option over BSA regimen.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME

Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2015/03/005655).

Equations to estimate prednisone dose using body weight

BACKGROUND

In the clinical practice, prednisone (PDN) dose in children is often prescribed using the patient weight, despite dose calculation using body surface area (BSA) is assumed to be preferable, because it parallels better with PDN metabolism in human subjects.

METHODS

Calculations based on body weight (W) carry the risk of underdosing, particularly in young children. Conversely, BSA estimation requires knowing the patient height, which is not always available, and more complex calculations.

RESULTS

To overcome these limitations, we have developed linear equations allowing approximating the BSA-based dose using only the patient weight in kilogram. To this end, we have used anthropomorphic data from 754 pediatric patients and have validated the proposed equations with a prospective cohort of 77 children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome. The equation estimating a dose of 60 mg/m² was [2 × W + 8] and the equation estimating a dose of 40 mg/m² was [W + 11].

CONCLUSIONS

Both equations performed very well and predicted reliably the BSA-based dose with an average error of 3.4% and 2.2%, respectively.

The Italian Society for Pediatric Nephrology (SINePe) consensus document on the management of nephrotic syndrome in children: Part I - Diagnosis and treatment of the first episode and the first relapse

This consensus document is aimed at providing an updated, multidisciplinary overview on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric nephrotic syndrome (NS) at first presentation. It is the first consensus document of its kind to be produced by all the pediatric nephrology centres in Italy, in line with what is already present in other countries such as France, Germany and the USA. It is based on the current knowledge surrounding the symptomatic and steroid treatment of NS, with a view to providing the basis for a separate consensus document on the treatment of relapses. NS is one of the most common pediatric glomerular diseases, with an incidence of around 2-7 cases per 100000 children per year. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, but the optimal therapeutic regimen for managing childhood idiopathic NS is still under debate. In Italy, shared treatment guidelines were lacking and, consequently, the choice of steroid regimen was based on the clinical expertise of each individual unit. On the basis of the 2015 Cochrane systematic review, KDIGO Guidelines and more recent data from the literature, this working group, with the contribution of all the pediatric nephrology centres in Italy and on the behalf of the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology, has produced a shared steroid protocol that will be useful for National Health System hospitals and pediatricians. Investigations at initial presentation and the principal causes of NS to be screened are suggested. In the early phase of the disease, symptomatic treatment is also important as many severe complications can occur which are either directly related to the pathophysiology of the underlying NS or to the steroid treatment itself. To date, very few studies have been published on the prophylaxis and treatment of these early complications, while recommendations are either lacking or conflicting. This consensus provides indications for the prevention, early recognition and treatment of these complications (management of edema and hypovolemia, therapy and prophylaxis of infections and thromboembolic events). Finally, recommendations about the clinical definition of steroid resistance and its initial diagnostic management, as well as indications for renal biopsy are provided.

Body surface area formulae: an alarming ambiguity

Body surface area (BSA) plays a key role in several medical fields, including cancer chemotherapy, transplantology, burn treatment and toxicology. BSA is often a major factor in the determination of the course of treatment and drug dosage. A series of formulae to simplify the process have been developed. Because easy-to-identify, yet general, body coefficient results of those formulae vary considerably, the question arises as to whether the choice of a particular formula is valid and safe for patients. Here we show that discrepancies between most of the known BSA formulae can reach 0.5 m² for the standard adult physique. Although many previous studies have demonstrated that certain BSA formulae provide an almost exact fit with the patients examined, all of these studies have been performed on a limited and isolated group of people. Our analysis presents a broader perspective, considering 25 BSA formulae. The analysis revealed that the choice of a particular formula is a difficult task. Differences among calculations made by the formulae are so great that, in certain cases, they may considerably affect patients’ mortality, especially for people with an abnormal physique or for children.

Body weight-based prednisolone versus body surface area-based prednisolone regimen for induction of remission in children with nephrotic syndrome: a randomized, open-label, equivalence clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Body surface area (BSA)-based prednisolone dosing for childhood nephrotic syndrome (NS) leads to higher cumulative prednisolone doses than body weight (BW)-based dosing. The clinical effects of this higher dosage have not been evaluated in prospective studies.

METHODS

This parallel-group open-label randomized clinical trial enrolled 100 children with idiopathic NS, to receive BW-based (n = 50) or BSA-based (n = 50) prednisolone dosing by block randomization in a 1:1 ratio. The time taken for remission, relapse rate per 6 months, and adverse effects of steroids were analyzed in both groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the time taken for remission in the BW group versus the BSA group (median (IQR) 7 (4.5-9) versus 5.5 (4-8) days; p = 0.082); similar results were observed on subgroup analysis in new-onset and infrequently-relapsing NS (IFRNS). The cumulative prednisolone dosage during the enrolment episode was higher in the BSA group. The incidence of hypertension was higher (p = 0.048) in the BSA group on per-protocol analysis. The relapse rates in the two groups per 6 months on follow-up were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes with BW-based dosing are equivalent to BSA dosing-related outcomes, although cumulative prednisolone doses are lower in the former. The practice of BW-based calculations for prescribing prednisolone in NS is a reasonable approach.

Treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: new guidelines from KDIGO

The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on glomerulonephritis (GN) is intended to assist the practitioner caring for patients with GN. Two chapters of this guideline focus specifically on nephrotic syndrome in children. Guideline development followed a thorough evidence review, and management recommendations and suggestions were based on the best available evidence. Critical appraisal of the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Chapters 3 and 4 of the guideline focus on the management of nephrotic syndrome in children aged 1-18 years. Guideline recommendations for children who have steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SNSS), defined by their response to corticosteroid therapy with complete remission, are addressed here. Recommendations for those with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) (i.e., do not achieve complete remission) are discussed in the companion article. Limitations of the evidence, including the paucity of large-scale randomized controlled trials, are discussed. This article provides a short description of the KDIGO process, the guideline recommendations for treatment of SSNS in children and a brief review of relevant treatment trials related to each recommendation.

Increased cerebral oxidative damage and decreased antioxidant defenses in ovariectomized and sham-operated rats supplemented with vitamin A

Previous studies have linked oxidative stress with aging and aging-related processes, including menopause. Abnormalities in the redox state similar to those observed in menopausal women can be modeled experimentally with rat ovariectomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of vitamin A (retinol palmitate) supplementation (500 or 1,500 IU kg(-1) day(-1) for 30 days) on behavioral parameters and brain redox profile in ovariectomized (OVX) and sham-operated rats. Ovariectomy caused pronounced uterine atrophy and decreased locomotor/exploratory activity. Moreover, we found increased hypothalamic and frontal cortex superoxide dismutase/catalase (SOD/CAT) ratio and decreased hippocampal thiol content, accompanied by increased frontal cortex lipid oxidative damage (TBARS) in OVX rats. Vitamin A at 1,500 IUkg(-1) day(-1) decreased exploratory behavior and decreased total hippocampal thiol content in sham-operated rats, increased hippocampal SOD/CAT ratio and decreased total antioxidant potential in the hippocampus of both sham and OVX groups, and increased cortical TBARS levels in OVX rats. Thus, vitamin A may induce a pro-oxidant state in discrete brain regions of sham-operated and OVX rats. These results suggest some caution regarding the use of high doses of vitamin A supplementation during menopause.