Atypical HUS: time to take stock of current guidelines and outcome measures?

Typical or Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome and the Use of Eculizumab: 4 Illustrative Cases

Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in children is caused mostly by Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in our country. Atypical HUS (aHUS) causes include Streptococcus pneumoniae, methyl malonic aciduria, deficiency of ADAMST 13, and genetic or acquired disorder of the complement. Treatment of HUS relies on supportive measures while treatment of aHUS includes plasmapheresis and specific treatments. Recently, eculizumab has been proposed for the treatment of aHUS and many clinicians now believe that eculizumab should be the first-line standard of care. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the difficulties in the diagnostic process of HUS and therefore the subsequent problem to promptly choose the appropriate treatment. To date, workup of HUS continues to take many days leaving the clinicians with a choice between several therapeutic options. With the emergence of eculizumab, it becomes crucial to find faster diagnostic tools and to adapt HUS treatment protocols. We reported here clinical cases where eculizumab use was probably not appropriate once the correct diagnosis of typical HUS was made and cases where it would have been useful because of the late diagnosis of aHUS.

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a clinical conundrum

BACKGROUND

Patients negative for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) are categorized as having atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and are associated with an increased risk for complement mutations and poorer prognosis compared with typical HUS. However, STEC identification is limited by the natural history of HUS.

METHODS

The current study is aimed at identifying HUS patients with poor outcomes based on the presence or absence of diarrhea (D) or Shiga toxin (S). A single-center retrospective review (2003-2012) of 42 HUS patients (follow-up 31.3 ± 38.7 months) was carried out. HUS was managed clinically with supportive treatments such as dialysis, plasma therapy, and eculizumab.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the D+S+ (31 %), D+S- (50 %) and D-S- (19 %) groups in the outcome variables of chronic kidney disease stages I-II (100 % vs 81 % vs 67 %) and proteinuria at follow-up (20 % vs 12.5 % vs 33.3 %), hospitalization duration (16.0 ± 8.7 vs 18.1 ± 9.5 vs 23.7 ± 12.9 days); dialysis requirement (50 % vs 81 % vs 66.7 %), and dialysis duration (10.2 ± 1.9 vs 33.3 ± 72.8 vs 10.3 ± 8.1 days). There was no significant difference in study outcomes in STEC+ (59 %) versus STEC- (41 %) groups. Genetic testing was performed in 12 % of HUS patients based on age, recurrent HUS, familial HUS, persistently low C3, or prolonged dialysis, and 80 % of the patients tested were positive for genetic mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does not show poorer outcomes in STEC- HUS. Indications and the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing, eculizumab, and plasmapheresis in STEC- HUS need to be evaluated further.

Eculizumab in Typical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) With Neurological Involvement

In typical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) approximately 25% of patients show central nervous system (CNS) involvement often leading to serious long-term disabilities. We used the C5-complement inhibitor Eculizumab as rescue therapy. From 2011 to 2014, 11 children (median age 22 months, range 11-175) with enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli-positive HUS requiring dialysis who had seizures (11/11) and/or were in a stupor or coma (10/11) were treated with Eculizumab. Two patients enrolled on the Safety and Efficacy Study of Eculizumab in Shiga-Toxin Producing E coli Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome (STEC-HUS) each received 6 doses of Eculizumab, 3 patients 2 doses, and 6 patients 1 dose. Laboratory diagnostics of blood samples and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed as per center practice. Data were analyzed retrospectively. Cranial MRI was abnormal in 8 of 10 patients with findings in the basal ganglia and/or white matter. A 2-year-old boy with severe cardiac involvement and status epilepticus needed repeated cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. He died 8 days after start of Eculizumab treatment. Two patients with hemorrhagic colitis and repeated seizures required artificial ventilation for 6 and 16 days, respectively. At the time of discharge, 1 patient showed severe neurological impairment and 1 mild neurological impairment. The 8 surviving patients experienced no further seizures after the first dose of Eculizumab. Three patients showed mild neurological impairment at discharge, whilst the remaining 5 showed no impairment. The platelets normalized 4 days (median) after the first dose of Eculizumab (range 0-20 days). The mean duration of dialysis after the first dose of Eculizumab was 14.1 ± 6.1 days. In children with typical HUS and CNS involvement early use of Eculizumab appears to improve neurological outcome. In severe HUS cases which progress rapidly with multiple organ involvement, late treatment with Eculizumab seems to show less benefit. We speculate that prophylactic Eculizumab therapy before development of neurological symptoms could be advantageous.

Success of eculizumab in the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Disorders of complement regulation are the most important etiology of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Recent studies demonstrate that eculizumab is beneficial in long-term aHUS treatment. We present a series of children with aHUS resistant to/dependent on plasma exchange (PE) who were treated with eculizumab.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in which data were retrieved from the medical files of children who had received PE as treatment for aHUS. The data retrieved included age, sex, presenting symptoms, presence of diarrhea/vomiting, hospitalization duration, laboratory data on admission and follow-up, need for transfusion or dialysis, response to PE, response to eculizumab and outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 15 children diagnosed with aHUS in 2011 and 2012 in our departments, ten were resistant to, or dependent on, plasma therapy and treated with eculizumab; these children were enrolled in the study. Three patients had relapses, and seven had a new diagnosis. Nine children had oliguria or anuria, and eight required dialysis. Hypertension was observed in six patients. Neurologic involvement developed in six patients, with the symptoms including seizures, loss of balance, vision loss and severe confusion. Five and five patients were resistant to and dependent on plasma therapy, respectively. Following the start of eculizumab treatment, all patients achieved full recovery of renal function and hematologic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In our ten pediatric patients with aHUS who did not respond to PE, eculizumab was a lifesaving therapy and improved their quality of life. Early eculizumab use was a rescue therapy for renal function. Our results show that eculizumab is an effective treatment for aHUS. However, more studies are needed on the long-term efficacy and safety of eculizumab in children with aHUS and to determine the optimal duration of treatment.

Adenosine deaminase deficient severe combined immunodeficiency presenting as atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome

PURPOSE

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency is a systemic disorder of purine metabolism. Deficiency of the purine salvage enzyme ADA leads to the build-up of the toxic metabolites, deoxyadenosine triphosphate and deoxyadenosine. ADA is ubiquitously expressed in all tissues of the body but most profoundly affects lymphocyte development and function leading to severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). Unlike most other forms of SCID, ADA deficiency also results in non-immunologic manifestations. Associations between ADA deficiency and sensorineural hearing loss, behavioural abnormalities, non-infectious pulmonary disease and skeletal dysplasia are all recognised, and affect the long term outcome for these patients. Identification of new non-immunological manifestations and clinical presentations of ADA deficiency is essential to allow early optimisation of supportive care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here we report four patients with ADA deficiency whose presenting feature was haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). 3 of 4 patients were diagnosed with ADA deficiency only after developing HUS, and one diagnosis was made post mortem, after a sibling was diagnosed with SCID. Shiga-toxigenic organisms were not isolated from any of the patients. 2 patients made a good recovery from their HUS with supportive treatment and initiation of PEG-ADA. Both remain well on enzyme replacement with mild or no residual renal impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of this previously unreported non-immunologic manifestation of ADA deficiency.

Eculizumab in neonatal hemolytic uremic syndrome with homozygous factor H deficiency

BACKGROUND

Neonatal atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare but severe disease that is mainly due to methylmalonic aciduria or genetic complement abnormalities. Traditional management of aHUS includes plasma infusion/exchange, but in small or unstable infants, plasma exchange can be challenging because of high extracorporeal volume and difficulty to obtain an adequate venous access. The C5 complement blocker eculizumab has become a cornerstone of first-line management of aHUS due to complement deregulation in older patients. However, little data are available on its use in neonatal aHUS.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We report on an 11-day-old neonate with severe aHUS (myocardial impairment, respiratory failure, acute kidney disease requiring hemodiafiltration) due to homozygous factor-H deficiency. She received early treatment with eculizumab as first-line therapy and completely recovered within 5 days. A second dose of eculizumab was administered 7 days after the first infusion, followed by a dose every 2 weeks for 2 months and then every 3 weeks, at the same dosage (300 mg). With more than 24 months of follow-up, renal function remains normal.

CONCLUSIONS

We report on the long-term efficacy and safety of eculizumab as first-line therapy in neonatal aHUS. However its use still requires optimization in terms of indications and administration (frequency, dosage).

Eculizumab in anti-factor h antibodies associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a life-threatening multisystemic condition often leading to end-stage renal failure. It results from an increased activation of the alternative pathway of the complement system due to mutations of genes coding for inhibitors of this pathway or from autoantibodies directed against them. Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against complement component C5 and inhibiting the activation of the effector limb of the complement system. Its efficacy has already been demonstrated in aHUS. The present article reports for the first time the use of eculizumab in a patient presenting with aHUS associated with circulating anti-complement Factor H autoantibodies and complicated by cardiac and neurologic symptoms. Our observation highlights the efficacy of eculizumab in this form of aHUS not only on renal symptoms but also on the extrarenal symptoms. It also suggests that eculizumab should be used very promptly after aHUS presentation to prevent life-threatening complications and to reduce the risk of chronic disabilities. To obtain a complete inhibition of the effector limb activation, the advised dosage must be respected. After this initial therapy in the autoimmune aHUS form, a long-term immunosuppressive treatment should be considered, to prevent relapses by reducing anti-complement Factor H autoantibody plasma levels.

Successful treatment of DEAP-HUS with eculizumab

BACKGROUND

Deficiency of complement factor H-related (CFHR) proteins and CFH autoantibody-positive hemolytic uremic syndrome (DEAP-HUS) represents a unique subgroup of complement-mediated atypical HUS (aHUS). Autoantibodies to the C-terminus of CFH block CFH surface recognition and mimic mutations found in the genetic form of (CFH-mediated) aHUS. CFH autoantibodies are found in 10-15 % of aHUS patients and occur--so far unexplained--almost exclusively in the background of CFHR1 or CFHR3/CFHR1 deletions.

METHODS

As a well-defined role for eculizumab in the treatment of complement-mediated aHUS is becoming established, its role in DEAP-HUS is less conspicuous, where a B-cell-depleting and immunosuppressive treatment strategy is being proposed in the literature.

RESULTS

We here show eculizumab to be safe and effective in maintaining a disease-free state, without recurrence, in a previously plasma-therapy-dependent DEAP-HUS patient, and in another patient in whom, although showing a good clinical response to plasma therapy, the therapy was hampered by allergic reactions to fresh frozen plasma and contend there is a rationale for the use of eculizumab in concert with an immunosuppressive strategy in the treatment of DEAP-HUS. Considering the high rate of early relapse, the possible coexistence and contribution of both known and unknown complement-gene mutations, the probable pathogenic role of CFHR1 as a complement alternative pathway (CAP) regulator, the experimental nature of measuring and using anti-CFH autoantibodies to guide management, and until the positive reports of immunosuppression in addition to plasma therapy are confirmed in prospective studies, we feel that a complement-directed therapy should not be neglected in DEAP-HUS. Serial CFH autoantibody titer testing may become a valuable tool to monitor treatment response, and weaning patients off eculizumab may become an option once CFH autoantibody levels are depleted.

CONCLUSIONS

A prospective study of eculizumab treatment in a larger cohort of DEAP-HUS patients is required to validate the applicability of our positive experience.

Discontinuation of eculizumab maintenance treatment for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a report of 10 cases

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy, and as many as 70% of patients with aHUS have mutations in the genes encoding complement regulatory proteins. Eculizumab, a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody targeting C5, has been used successfully in patients with aHUS since 2009. The standard maintenance treatment requires life-long eculizumab therapy, but the possibility of discontinuation has not yet been tested systematically. We report the safety of discontinuing eculizumab treatment in 10 patients who stopped treatment with the aim of minimizing the risk of adverse reactions, reducing the risk of meningitis, and improving quality of life while also reducing the considerable treatment costs. Disease activity was monitored closely at home by means of urine dipstick testing for hemoglobin. During the cumulative observation period of 95 months, 3 of the 10 patients experienced relapse within 6 weeks of discontinuation, but then immediately resumed treatment and completely recovered. Our experience supports the possibility of discontinuing eculizumab therapy with strict home monitoring for early signs of relapse in patients with aHUS who achieve stable remission.

A systematic review of eculizumab for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of eculizumab for patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS), compared with current treatment options.

DESIGN

A systematic review was performed according to the general principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. All study designs were included, except case histories.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients diagnosed with aHUS were included; no age restrictions were used.

INTERVENTIONS

Eculizumab compared with current treatment options.

IDENTIFICATION OF STUDIES

12 databases were searched. Additional searches were performed through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Electronic Medicines Compendium websites, Google internet searches and contacting clinical experts. Reference lists of relevant articles were checked for additional studies.

RESULTS

2 small, uncontrolled prospective multinational, multicentre studies and one small uncontrolled multinational, multicentre retrospective study were included. No meta-analyses were performed. Compared with baseline measures, thrombotic microangiopathy event-free status was achieved in 84% of patients in the prospective studies. Adverse events, as documented by enrolling investigators were frequent, with upper-respiratory tract infection affecting a third of patients. No deaths or episodes of meningitis or meningococcal septicaemia occurred in the prospective studies. Results of the study extension phases up to 114 weeks indicate that the benefits of the treatment are sustained.

CONCLUSIONS

Eculizumab is clinically effective for the treatment of aHUS. Further research is needed to evaluate eculizumab, ideally using patient-related clinical outcomes. If randomised studies are not feasible, study investigators should ensure that the threat of bias is minimised in future studies of eculizumab with respect to the reporting of patient recruitment and selection.