Risk factors for relapse and long-term outcome in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome treated with rituximab

Risk factors and retreatment for relapse in childhood primary nephrotic syndrome treated with rituximab

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of rituximab (RTX) for steroid-dependent/frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDNS/FRNS) in children is well documented. However, there are insufficient data on relapse risk factors. Additionally, the retreat regimen for relapsed children requires further investigation.

METHODS

We administered single dose RTX (375 mg/m2, maximum 500 mg) to children with SDNS/FRNS between May 2020 and December 2022. An additional single dose of RTX was administered when B-cell depletion (CD19 + B cells < 1%) was incomplete or B-cell recovery (CD19 + B cells ≥ 1%) occurred. Primary and secondary outcomes were the first and second relapse, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were included and the observation period was 12.2-43.2 months. Thirty-three patients (37.1%) relapsed after RTX treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that previous steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) history and low NK-cell percentage at initial RTX treatment were independent risk factors for first relapse. In the relapse group, 26 patients (78.8%) continued RTX treatment upon B-cell recovery. During mean follow-up period of (15.4 ± 8.1) months, 15 patients (45.5%) experienced a second relapse. Compared with non-continued RTX treatment group, the continued RTX treatment group had a lower relapse rate (34.6% (9/26) versus 85.7% (6/7); P = 0.047) and fewer relapses (0.0 (0.0, 0.6) versus 1.8 (0.9, 2.7) times/year; P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that continued RTX treatment was the protective factor for second relapse.

CONCLUSION

Previous SRNS history and low NK-cell percentage at initial RTX treatment may be associated with higher risk of relapse. Despite the possibility of relapse during RTX treatment, continued RTX treatment is effective in reducing relapse.

The efficacy and dynamic changes of immune function of rituximab with mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of steroid-dependent /frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 70%～90% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) will suffer from steroid dependency or frequent relapses, prompting the use of steroid-sparing agent. In this study, we investigate the efficacy and the characteristics of dynamic changes in immune function of two doses of rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of steroid-dependent/frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDNS /FRNS).

METHOD

Retrospective follow-up study was conducted in our hospital from June 2022 to September 2023. 7 children with SDNS /FRNS were allocated to intravenous 2 doses RTX (each dose 375mg/m2, 1 dose per week) and administered the standard oral dose of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1000-1200/m2/d, divided into 2 doses) when B cells have recovered (≥ 5/ul). The study subjects after treatment were monitored for the efficacy and dynamic changes of immune function for 12 months.

RESULT

7 children with SDNS/FRNS who were treated RTX with MMF and followed up for 12 months have no relapse. The rate of B cell depletion (< 5/ul) was 100% at 1 week after the second dose of RTX treatment, and the rate of B cell recovery was 100% at 5-12 months after the first dose of RTX treatment. There was no significant difference with T cell subsets (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8) at each follow-up time points (all P > 0.05). The count of NK cells was significantly higher than that of other groups at 1 week after the second dose (P < 0.05). The IgM level at 1 week after the second dose was significantly lower than that before treatment and 1 week after the first dose (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences with IgA, IgG, C3 and C4 before treatment, 1 week after the first dose and 1 week after the second dose (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Administering two doses of RTX along with the standard dose of MMF has been effective in maintaining remission for children with SDNS/FRNS. B cell depletion can be achieved one week after the second dose of RTX treatment. NK cell proliferation may play a role in B cell depletion, and early B cell depletion may suppress the production of IgM. These findings require further validation through additional clinical trials and basic research.

An international, multi-center study evaluated rituximab therapy in childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

The efficacy and safety of rituximab in childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at 28 pediatric nephrology centers from 19 countries in Asia, Europe, North America and Oceania to evaluate this. Children with SRNS treated with rituximab were analyzed according to the duration of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) treatment before rituximab [6 months or more (CNI-resistant) and under 6 months]. Primary outcome was complete/partial remission (CR/PR) as defined by IPNA/KDIGO guidelines. Secondary outcomes included kidney failure and adverse events. Two-hundred-forty-six children (mean age, 6.9 years; 136 boys; 57% focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, FSGS) were followed a median of 32.4 months after rituximab. All patients were in non-remission before rituximab. (146 and 100 children received CNIs for 6 month or more or under 6 months before rituximab, respectively). In patients with CNI-resistant SRNS, the remission rates (CR/PR) at 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months were 26% (95% confidence interval 19.3-34.1), 35.6% (28.0-44.0), 35.1% (27.2-43.8) and 39.1% (29.2-49.9), respectively. Twenty-five patients were in PR at 12-months, of which 22 had over 50% reduction in proteinuria from baseline. The remission rates among children treated with CNIs under 6 months before rituximab were 42% (32.3-52.3), 52% (41.8-62.0), 54% (44.3-64.5) and 60% (47.6-71.3) at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months. Upon Kaplan-Meier analysis, non-remission and PR at 12-months after rituximab, compared to CR, were associated with significantly worse kidney survival. Adverse events occurred in 30.5% and most were mild. Thus, rituximab enhances remission in a subset of children with SRNS, is generally safe and CR following rituximab is associated with favorable kidney outcome.

Predictive factors of long-term disease remission after rituximab administration in patients with childhood-onset complicated steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that rituximab (RTX)-associated adverse events may be relatively frequent in younger patients, recent studies have reported RTX as a suitable first-line steroid-sparing agent for maintaining remission in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, the impact of age at RTX initiation on the long-term outcome remains unknown in this cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of 61 patients with complicated SDNS who received a single dose of RTX (375 mg/m2) followed by maintenance immunosuppressive agents (IS) from January 2008 to March 2021. In patients who achieved > 12 months of prednisolone-free remission, IS tapering within 6 months was tried to achieve. The primary endpoint was the probability of achieving long-term treatment-free remission at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

After RTX initiation, 52 patients (85.2%) relapsed after a median of 665 days, and 44 patients (72.1%) received additional RTX doses (total, 226 infusions). At the last follow-up (median observation period, 8.3 years; median age, 18.3 years), 16 patients (26.2%) achieved long-term remission. Multivariate analysis showed that older age at RTX initiation was the independent predictive factor for achieving long-term remission (odds ratio, 1.25; p < 0.05). The proportion of those who achieved long-term remission was significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 13.5 years than in those aged < 13.5 years at RTX initiation (52.6 vs 14.3%, p < 0.05). Persistent severe hypogammaglobulinemia did not develop in older children (≥ 13.5 years) at RTX initiation.

CONCLUSION

For older children with complicated SDNS, RTX appeared to be a suitable disease-modifying therapy without persistent adverse events.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Tacrolimus in Children With Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

Introduction

In the Rituximab for Relapse Prevention in Nephrotic Syndrome (RITURNS) trial, we demonstrated superior efficacy of single-course rituximab over maintenance tacrolimus in preventing relapses in children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) during a 1-year observation. Here we present the long-term outcomes of all 117 trial completers, who were followed up for another 2 years.

Methods

Relapsing patients in the rituximab arm received a second course of rituximab, either with (n = 44) or without mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) cotreatment (n = 15). In the tacrolimus arm, second line rituximab monotherapy was initiated after relapses (n = 32) or electively (n = 24).

Results

All 12-month relapse-free patients in the rituximab arm relapsed in the second postexposure year, resulting in similar median relapse-free survival times in the 2 trial arms (62 vs. 59 weeks). Second line rituximab in the tacrolimus arm was less effective than first-line therapy in patients switched to rituximab following a relapse (relapse-free survival 55 vs. 63 weeks, P < 0.01). B-cell counts 6 months post-rituximab predicted relapse risk both for first and second line therapy. MMF cotreatment yielded much improved 2-year relapse-free survival as compared to rituximab monotherapy (67% vs. 9%, P < 0.0001). Higher grade 2 adverse event rates were observed post-rituximab versus on tacrolimus (0.87 vs. 0.53 per year).

Conclusion

The superior therapeutic effect of rituximab in SDNS vanishes during the second year post-exposure. Rituximab appears to yield longer remission when applied as first line as compared to second line therapy. Maintenance MMF following rituximab induces long-term disease remission.

CD4 + and CD8 + T-lymphocyte number as predictive marker of relapse after rituximab treatment in childhood-onset refractory nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a promising option for refractory idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. However, no simple predictive markers for relapse after rituximab have been established. To determine such markers, we investigated the relationship between CD4 + and CD8 + cell counts and relapse after rituximab administration.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome who received rituximab followed by immunosuppressive as maintenance therapy. Patients were divided into no relapse in 2 years after rituximab treatment or relapse group. After rituximab treatment, CD4 + /CD8 + cell counts were measured monthly, at prednisolone discontinuation, and at B-lymphocyte recovery. To predict relapse, these cell counts were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Additionally, relapse-free survival was reevaluated based on the result of ROC analysis for 2 years.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (18 in the relapse group) were enrolled. At prednisolone discontinuation (52 days after rituximab treatment), the relapse-free group showed significantly lower cell counts than the relapse group (median CD4 + cell count: 686 vs. 942 cells/µL, p = 0.006; CD8 + : 613 vs. 812 cells/µL, p = 0.005). In the ROC analysis, CD4 + cell count > 938 cell/µL and CD8 + cell count > 660 cells/µL could predict relapse in 2 years (sensitivity, 56% and 83%; specificity, 87% and 70%). The patient group with both lower CD4 + and CD8 + cell counts showed significantly longer 50% relapse-free survival (1379 vs. 615 days, p < 0.001 and 1379 vs. 640 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower CD4 + and CD8 + cell counts in the early phase after rituximab administration may predict a lower risk of relapse.

Use of Rituximab in Childhood Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Rituximab is an established therapy in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome to sustain short- to medium-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. Recent trials focus on its use as a first-line agent among those with milder disease severity. Rituximab is used in multidrug refractory nephrotic syndrome and post-transplant disease recurrence, although the evidence is much less substantial. Available data suggest that the treatment response to rituximab depends on various patient factors, dosing regimen, and the concomitant use of maintenance immunosuppression. After repeated treatments, patients are found to have an improving response overall with a longer relapse-free period. The drug effect, however, is not permanent, and 80% of patients eventually relapse and many will require an additional course of rituximab. This underpins the importance of understanding the long-term safety profile on repeated treatments. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are concerns about long-term hypogammaglobulinemia, especially in young children. Reliable immunophenotyping and biomarkers are yet to be discovered to predict treatment success, risk of both rare and severe side effects, e.g. , persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and guiding of redosing strategy. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the use of rituximab for childhood nephrotic syndrome and how the therapeutic landscape is evolving.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Rituximab to Maintain Remission in Idiopathic Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome: An International Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes after multiple courses of rituximab among children with frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRSDNS) are unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study at 16 pediatric nephrology centers from ten countries in Asia, Europe, and North America included children with FRSDNS who received two or more courses of rituximab. Primary outcomes were relapse-free survival and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 346 children (age, 9.8 years; IQR, 6.6-13.5 years; 73% boys) received 1149 courses of rituximab. A total of 145, 83, 50, 28, 22, and 18 children received two, three, four, five, six, and seven or more courses, respectively. Median (IQR) follow-up was 5.9 (4.3-7.7) years. Relapse-free survival differed by treatment courses (clustered log-rank test P<0.001). Compared with the first course (10.0 months; 95% CI, 9.0 to 10.7 months), relapse-free period and relapse risk progressively improved after subsequent courses (12.0-16.0 months; HRadj, 0.03-0.13; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; P<0.001). The duration of B-cell depletion remained similar with repeated treatments (6.1 months; 95% CI, 6.0 to 6.3 months). Adverse events were mostly mild; the most common adverse events were hypogammaglobulinemia (50.9%), infection (4.5%), and neutropenia (3.7%). Side effects did not increase with more treatment courses nor a higher cumulative dose. Only 78 of the 353 episodes of hypogammaglobulinemia were clinically significant. Younger age at presentation (2.8 versus 3.3 years; P=0.05), age at first rituximab treatment (8.0 versus 10.0 years; P=0.01), and history of steroid resistance (28% versus 18%; P=0.01) were associated with significant hypogammaglobulinemia. All 53 infective episodes resolved, except for one patient with hepatitis B infection and another with EBV infection. There were 42 episodes of neutropenia, associated with history of steroid resistance (30% versus 20%; P=0.04). Upon last follow-up, 332 children (96%) had normal kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

Children receiving repeated courses of rituximab for FRSDNS experience an improving clinical response. Side effects appear acceptable, but significant complications can occur. These findings support repeated rituximab use in FRSDNS.

Rituximab Use for the Treatment of Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome by Canadian Pediatric Nephrologists: A National Survey

Background:

There is known practice variation in the treatment of frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent, and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. Rituximab is an emerging therapy for difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome; however, there are no clear treatment guidelines. We therefore hypothesized that a wide variety of approaches to this therapy exist.

Objective:

To evaluate when and how rituximab is used for the treatment of childhood nephrotic syndrome in Canada.

Design and setting:

An online survey was used.

Participants:

Canadian pediatric nephrologists.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was distributed across Canada through the Canadian Association of Pediatric Nephrologists (CAPN) to evaluate rituximab treatment practices.

Results:

Of a total of 20 responses, 19 (95%) use rituximab in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome, usually as a third or fourth agent. For the number of rituximab doses, the majority (68%) uses 2 doses each time they use it. Eighteen respondents (90%) measure B cells when using this medication, mostly monthly (50%) or every 3 months (39%). Respondents were administered additional doses of rituximab prophylactically (74%) or at first relapse (47%). Long-term drug safety and drug funding were identified as the main barriers to rituximab use.

Limitations:

This survey represents the practice styles of physicians in a single country, and there is a nonresponse bias of 63%. Also, associations were not calculated.

Conclusions:

Among Canadian pediatric nephrologists, rituximab use for nephrotic syndrome appears to be increasing, but significant practice variations remain, including approaches to B-cell monitoring. It is reserved mostly for second-line and third-line use due to cost, funding issues, and residual uncertainty regarding long-term safety. Understanding these critical areas of practice uncertainty is a first step to optimize treatment of nephrotic syndrome in children.

Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is a rare condition that develops primarily in preadolescent children after the age of 1 year. Since the 1950s, oral corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment of all children presenting with nephrotic syndrome, with most patients responding within 4 weeks to an oral course of prednisone (PDN). However, corticosteroids have important side effects and 60-80 % of patients relapse, developing frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent forms. For these reasons, many patients require second-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications that have considerably improved relapse-free survival, while avoiding many PDN-related toxicities. Since most patients will eventually heal from their disease with a normal kidney function, the morbidity of SSNS is primarily related to side effects of drugs that are used to maintain prolonged remission. Therefore, treatment is essentially based on balancing the use of different drugs to achieve permanent remission with the lowest cumulative number of side effects. Treatment choice is based on the severity of SSNS, on patient age, and on drug tolerability. This review provides an update of currently available therapeutic strategies for SSNS.

Rituximab in children with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: in quest of the optimal regimen

Rituximab has emerged as an effective and important therapy in children with complicated frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome to induce long-term disease remission and avoid steroid toxicities. The optimal rituximab regimen is not totally well defined, and there are many varying practices worldwide. We will in this review describe how patient factors, rituximab dose, and use of maintenance immunosuppression affect treatment outcomes. Specifically, low-dose rituximab without concomitant immunosuppression is associated with shorter relapse-free duration while other regimens have comparable outcomes. Patients with more severe disease generally have worse response to rituximab. Although rituximab appears to be generally safe, there are growing concerns of chronic hypogammaglobulinemia and impaired immunity especially in young children. Reliable prognostications and biomarkers for guiding subsequent treatments to avoid excessive treatments are yet to be identified. In this review, we will outline the, as we see it, best approach of rituximab in childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome at the present state of knowledge.

Prophylactic rituximab administration in children with complicated nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is effective for maintaining remission in patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome, although a history of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a risk factor for early relapse. We investigated the efficacy of prophylactic rituximab treatment for maintaining remission after B cell recovery.

METHODS

Patients with complicated steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome with history of SRNS who received a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) and continued immunosuppressive agents were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: a prophylaxis group, which received additional rituximab treatment at B cell recovery and a non-prophylaxis group. The relapse-free period from the last rituximab infusion (the second treatment in prophylaxis group and the first treatment in non-prophylaxis group) was compared between two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for early relapse were calculated using multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients in the prophylaxis group and 45 in the non-prophylaxis group were enrolled. Fifty-percent relapse-free survival after the last rituximab treatment was 667 days in the former and 335 days in the latter (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that additional rituximab treatment was the only significant negative factor for early relapse, with a hazard ratio of 0.40 (p = 0.02). Fifty-percent relapse-free survival after B cell recovery was much longer in the prophylaxis group (954 vs. 205.5 days, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional rituximab treatment at B cell recovery can maintain prolonged remission even after B cell recovery in patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome with history of SRNS.

Both the rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression in steroid-dependent/frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome have important effects on outcomes

Rituximab is an effective treatment for steroid-dependent/ frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDFRNS) in children. However, the optimal rituximab regimen remains unknown. To help determine this we conducted an international, multicenter retrospective study at 11 tertiary pediatric nephrology centers in Asia, Europe and North America of children 1-18 years of age with complicated SDFRNS receiving rituximab between 2005-2016 for 18 or more months follow-up. The effect of rituximab prescribed at three dosing levels: low (375mg/m²), medium (750mg/m²) and high (1125-1500mg/m²), with or without maintenance immunosuppression (defined as concurrent use of corticosteroids, mycophenolate motile or calcineurin inhibition at first relapse or for at least six months following the rituximab treatment) was examined. Among the 511 children (median age 11.5 year, 67% boys), 191, 208 and 112 received low, medium and high dose rituximab, respectively. Within this total cohort of 511 children, 283 (55%) received maintenance immunosuppression. Renal biopsies were performed in 317 children indicating the predominant histology was minimal change disease (74%). Without maintenance immunosuppression, low-dose rituximab had a shorter relapse-free period and a higher relapse risk (8.5 months) than medium (12.7 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62) and high dose (14.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50; all significant). With maintenance immunosuppression, the relapse-free survival in low-dose rituximab (14 months) was similar to medium (10.9 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23) and high dose (12.0 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; all non-significant). Most adverse events were mild. Thus, children receiving low-dose rituximab without maintenance immunosuppression had the shortest relapse-free survival. Hence, both rituximab dose and maintenance immunosuppression have important effects on the treatment outcomes.

Efficacy of Rituximab vs Tacrolimus in Pediatric Corticosteroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Calcineurin inhibitors are an established first-line corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with corticosteroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (CDNS), whereas B-lymphocyte-depleting therapy is mostly used as a rescue for calcineurin inhibitor-resistant cases. The positive efficacy and safety profile of rituximab raises the question of whether it could be used as a first-line alternative to calcineurin inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of rituximab and tacrolimus in maintaining relapse-free survival among children with CDNS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A parallel-arm, open-label, randomized clinical trial was performed from May 8, 2015, to September 20, 2016, with 1-year follow-up in a single-center, tertiary care unit. A total of 176 consecutive children aged 3 to 16 years with CDNS not previously treated with corticosteroid-sparing agents were screened for eligibility.

INTERVENTIONS

The children received either tacrolimus (along with tapering alternate-day prednisolone) for 12 months or a single course of rituximab (2 infusions of 375 mg/m2).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Twelve-month relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Of the 176 children screened for eligibility, 120 were randomized and all but 3 patients completed 1 year of follow-up. The groups were comparable, with mean (SD) age of 7.2 (2.8) years, 32 boys (53.3%) in each group, mean (SD) disease duration of 2.5 (1.5) years and 2.3 (1.7) in the tacrolimus and rituximab groups, respectively, disease duration less than 1 year among 15 children (25.0%) in each group, median (interquartile range) of 4 (3-5) relapses in each group, and mean (SD) cumulative prednisolone dose of 246 (48) mg/kg and 239 (52) mg/kg in the prestudy year in the tacrolimus and rituximab groups, respectively. Rituximab therapy was associated with a higher 12-month relapse-free survival rate than tacrolimus (54 [90.0%] vs 38 [63.3%] children; P < .001; odds ratio, 5.21; 95% CI, 1.93-14.07). Among the patients who experienced relapse, median time to first relapse was 40 weeks in the rituximab group and 29 weeks in the tacrolimus group. Only 2 patients in the rituximab group had more than 1 relapse during the study period compared with 10 patients in the tacrolimus group. The cumulative corticosteroid dose during the 12-month study period was lower with rituximab compared with tacrolimus (mean [SD], 25.8 [27.8] vs 86.3 [58.0] mg/kg). Although both treatments were well tolerated, mild to moderate infections were twice as common in the tacrolimus group (26 [43.3%] vs 13 [21.7%] events).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In children with CDNS, rituximab appears to be more effective than tacrolimus in maintaining disease remission and minimizing corticosteroid exposure and, given its good tolerability and lack of nephrotoxic effects, may be considered as first-line corticosteroid-sparing therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02438982; Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2014/01/004355.

Serum sickness with refractory nephrotic syndrome following treatment with rituximab

Rituximab (RTX) is effective for treating childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome (NS), such as steroid-dependent (SD), frequently relapsing (FR), and steroid-resistant (SR) NS. While RTX has been proven to be effective in treating SDNS, FRNS, and SRNS, it may cause serum sickness, a rare illness characterized by fever, rash, and arthralgia, 10-14 days after primary antigen exposure or within a few days after secondary antigen exposure, by producing human anti-chimeric antibodies (HACAs). A 17-year-old girl with refractory SDNS treated with RTX and oral cyclosporine A was admitted with fever and arthralgia 10 days after the fifth RTX dose was administered. After RTX was started when she was 14-years-old, SDNS remission was then achieved, and prednisolone was discontinued. Although antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents were administered, fever and arthralgia continued. After various inspections and clinical course, we considered her as RTX-induced serum sickness (RISS). The patient had an elevated HACA level and was diagnosed with RISS. Fever and arthralgia disappeared 5 days after onset. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of RISS with NS. Fever, rash, and arthralgia after RTX administration can be the initial symptoms.

Long-term outcome of childhood-onset complicated nephrotic syndrome after a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab

BACKGROUND

Although rituximab effectively prevents relapses of complicated frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), data of long-term outcomes and safety are limited.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients (age, 3-38 years) with childhood-onset complicated FRNS or SDNS, who received rituximab in investigator-initiated multicenter prospective trials were enrolled. Rituximab was administered at 375 mg/m² once weekly for 4 weeks, and immunosuppressive agents were discontinued according to the study protocol. We investigated relapses, re-administration of immunosuppressive agents, additional rituximab treatment, body height, renal function, and late adverse events during the observation period.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (94%) developed relapses during the observation period (median, 59 months) and the 50% relapse-free survival was 261 days. Thirty patients (59%) developed SDNS, 44 (86%) required re-administration of immunosuppressive agents, and 22 (43%) received additional rituximab treatment. All patients who were receiving immunosuppressive agents at rituximab treatment required either immunosuppressive agents or additional rituximab treatment. On the contrary, 5 of the 13 patients without immunosuppressive agents at rituximab treatment required neither immunosuppressive agents nor additional rituximab treatment and 3 of them did not develop relapse during observation period. Growth failure due to steroid toxicity did not progress and none of the patients developed chronic renal insufficiency. None of the patients suffered from rituximab-related late adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

As most patients suffer from relapses after B-cell recovery, long-term immunosuppressive agents or additional rituximab treatment is necessary. However, some patients who can discontinue immunosuppressive agents before rituximab treatment may achieve long-term remission after rituximab treatment without immunosuppressive agents.

Long-term repeated rituximab treatment for childhood steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab (RTX) can be used as a rescue therapy for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, the efficacy and safety of long-term, repeated use of RTX are not established. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term, repeated RTX treatment in children.

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive child patients with SDNS who were treated with three or more cycles of RTX for one year or longer were recruited, and their medical records were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for 4.7 ± 1.9 years and received 5.2 ± 2.3 cycles of RTX over 2.8 ± 1.1 years. Approximately 70% of the additional RTX cycles were administered due to recovery of B-cells without relapse. The relapse rate decreased from 3.4 ± 2.0 per year initially to 0.4 ± 0.8 per year at the third year after RTX treatment. Approximately 10% of the RTX infusions were accompanied by mild infusion reactions. Eight patients showed sustained remission without any oral medication after the last cycle of RTX, while 10 patients had one or more episodes of relapse after the last cycle of RTX. The relapse rate in the latter group decreased from 2.8 ± 1.5 per year before RTX treatment to 1.3 ± 0.8 per year after cessation of RTX treatment. No significant differences in clinical parameters were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study showed that pre-emptive and long-term, repeated RTX treatment is relatively effective and safe in children with SDNS. However, well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Rituximab in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: experience of a tertiary center and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Rituximab (RTX) is a new treatment option in children with difficult-to-treat steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We evaluated the experience of our tertiary center and reviewed the current literature.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study evaluating the efficacy and safety of RTX in children with difficult-to-treat SDNS. Age at diagnosis, type and duration of immunosuppression, age at administration, dose of RTX, possible adverse events, number of relapses, duration of remission, and B-cell count after administration of RTX were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine children with a median age at diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome of 4.75 (range 1.33-11.33) years and a median age at administration of RTX of 16.08 (range 3.33-19.25) years were included. Before administration of RTX they had a median number of relapses per year of 1.70 (range 0.82-4.80). At last follow-up (median 2.75 years, range 0.58-3.92), a reduction in the number of relapses per year to 0.26 (range 0-2.18) was noted, despite cessation or lowering the dose of immunosuppressive therapy. Four patients achieved complete remission after the first administration of RTX, four more patients after subsequent doses of RTX. No severe adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSION

RTX was an effective and safe therapeutic option in our cohort of children with difficult-to-treat SDNS, resulting in a significant reduction of yearly relapses in the absence of severe adverse events and facilitating the reduction of other immunosuppressive medication.

Rituximab for nephrotic syndrome in children

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common chronic glomerular disease in children. At least 20 % of children with this syndrome show frequent relapses and/or steroid dependence during or after immunosuppressive therapies, a condition defined as complicated frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). Approximately 1-3 % of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome are resistant to steroids and all immunosuppressive agents, a condition defined as refractory steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS); these SRNS children have a high risk of end-stage renal failure. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective for patients with complicated FRNS/SDNS and refractory SRNS. This review describes the recent results of rituximab treatment applied to pediatric nephrotic syndrome, as well as those of our recent study, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab for childhood-onset complicated FRNS/SDNS (RCRNS01). The overall efficacy and safety of rituximab for this disease are discussed.

Ofatumumab in two pediatric nephrotic syndrome patients allergic to rituximab

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is an effective treatment in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, some patients develop adverse reactions.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

Patient 1, a 14-year-old boy with SDNS since the age of 2, was treated with oral prednisone, cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil. A first infusion of rituximab at age 12 years was well tolerated, but this was followed by a prolonged relapse unresponsive to oral prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil and CsA. A second rituximab infusion was attempted, but treatment was interrupted due to severe dyspnea. Treatment with a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, ofatumumab, was then attempted. The patient experienced a mild allergic reaction and maintained remission despite interruption of all treatment at >12 months of follow-up. Patient 2, a 3-year-old boy who presented at 18 months with nephrotic syndrome initially resistant to treatment with oral prednisone, was given with three intravenous boluses of methylprednisolone followed by CsA and achieved remission. Upon steroid discontinuation, the NS relapsed. Prednisone was restarted and treatment with a single dose of rituximab was never completed due to a severe allergic reaction. Ofatumumab infusion was uneventful, and he maintained remission during the follow-up period (>12 months) despite interruption of prednisone therapy. B cells reappeared at 7 months in both patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ofatumumab may be a therapeutic option in severe forms of NS with allergy to rituximab.