Iohexol plasma clearance in children: validation of multiple formulas and single-point sampling times

Comparison of different eGFR formulas to measured glomerular filtration rate using iohexol in children and adolescents with mild chronic kidney disease

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on different formulas is commonly used as a bedside tool to assess kidney function in children and young adults. The purpose of this study was to perform a measurement of glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a standard 5-point protocol using iohexol clearance and compare it to a simplified protocol for mGFR determination and to some of the most commonly used eGFR formulas. A 5-point standard protocol using iohexol clearance was used for determination of mGFR in 50 children with mild stages of CKD. The result was compared to 2- and 3-point sampling protocol as well as with some standard children eGFR formulas. We calculated the prediction performance for eGFR formulas to distinguish CKD1 and CKD 2 stages, formulas' accuracy, and cutoff values. Data were prospectively collected. All eGFR formulas exhibited a statistically significant positive correlation with mGFR. The best correlation was found with CKID2012 eGFR formula and with cystatin C-based eGFR formulas. The correlation between standard and simplified protocols for mGFR determination was also strong, while creatinine clearance did not prove to be a reliable method for estimating GFR. The error distribution with simplified protocols was not dispersed. The prediction value was strong for CKID2012 and bedside Schwartz formula. Conclusion: Fewer sampling points can be safely used for measuring GFR in children. eGFR formulas that are not based solely on creatinine should be considered more often in GFR estimation. What is Known? • Iohexol clearance is an established method of measuring GFR in children and adolescents using different protocols. • Estimating GFR in children and adolescents is troublesome and is done using different formulas with anthropometric and biochemical markers in children and adolescents. What is New? • Iohexol measurement with two or three blood withdrawals can reliably distinguish between CKD1 and CKD2 patients. • eGFR formulas have moderate reliability to predict distinguish between CKD1 and CKD2 patients, of which CKID2012 and bedside Schwartz formula were the most accurate in our study.

Iohexol plasma clearance measurement protocol standardization for adults: a consensus paper of the European Kidney Function Consortium

International consensus supports the development of standardized protocols for measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) to facilitate the integration of mGFR testing in both clinical and research settings. To this end, the European Kidney Function Consortium convened an international group of experts with relevant experience in mGFR. The working group performed an extensive literature search to inform the development of recommendations for mGFR determination using 1-compartment plasma clearance models and iohexol as the exogenous filtration marker. Iohexol was selected as it is non-radio labeled, inexpensive, and safe, can be assayed at a central laboratory, and the other commonly used non-radio-labeled tracers have been (inulin) or are soon to be (iothalamate) discontinued. A plasma clearance model was selected over urine clearance as it requires no urine collection. A 1 compartment was preferred to 2 compartments as it requires fewer samples. The recommendations are based on published evidence complemented by expert opinion. The consensus paper covers practical advice for patients and health professionals, preparation, administration, and safety aspects of iohexol, laboratory analysis, blood sample collection and sampling times using both multiple and single-sample protocols, description of the mGFR mathematical calculations, as well as implementation strategies. Supplementary materials include patient and provider information sheets, standard operating procedures, a study protocol template, and support for mGFR calculation.

Renal function, sex and age influence purines and pyrimidines in urine and could lead to diagnostic misinterpretation

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is commonly used in clinical practice for the diagnosis and follow-up of chronic kidney disease. Screening for inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) is based on analysis of biomarkers in urine, reported by their ratio to urinary creatinine (crn). Impaired renal function may complicate the interpretation of several biomarkers used for screening of IEM. Our goal was to investigate the influence of kidney function, in terms of measured GFR (mGFR) on purines and pyrimidines in urine, in addition to the relationship to sex, age, pH and ketosis. Children (n = 96) with chronic kidney disease (CKD), in different CKD stages, were included. Urine samples were obtained prior to the injection of iohexol. Serum samples at 7 time-points were used to calculate mGFR based on iohexol plasma clearance. The association with sex, age, ketosis and pH was examined in samples of the laboratory production from 2015 to 2021 (n = 8192). Age was a highly significant covariate for all markers. GFR correlated positively to several purines and pyrimidines; the ratios hypoxanthine/crn, xanthine/crn and urate/crn (p = 2.0 × 10-14, < 3 × 10-15 and 7.2 × 10-4, respectively), and the ratios orotic acid/crn, uracil/crn, and carbamyl-β-alanine/crn (p = 0.03, 1.4 × 10-6 and 0.003, respectively). The values of urate/crn, xanthine/crn, uracil/crn, and carbamyl-β-alanine/crn were higher in females above 16 years of age. Ketosis and pH influenced some markers. In conclusion, decreased renal function interferes with the excretion of urinary purines and pyrimidines, and this could change decision limits substantially, e.g. result in false negative results in Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. SYNOPSIS: GFR influences purines and pyrimidines in urine. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01092260, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01092260?term=tondel&rank=2.

Glomerular Filtration Rate Assessment in Children

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement is a key tool for determining the degree of chronic kidney disease. The assessment of GFR is even more challenging in children than in adults with more variables in the equation than race and sex. Monitoring the progress of the kidney disease can therefore be difficult as in the initial stages of a decline in kidney function, there are no clinical signs. Due to children's growth and development, changes in muscle mass and growth impair GFR estimation based solely on serum creatinine values. More invasive methods of GFR measurement are more reliable, but techniques using ionising agents, requiring large volume blood samples or timed voiding, have limited application in children. This paper reviews the methods of measuring and determining glomerular filtration rate and kidney function in children.

51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance in children: One, two, or multiple samples?

Plasma disappearance curves using multiple blood samples are a recognized reference method for measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, there is no consensus on the protocol for this type of measurement. A two-compartment model is generally considered acceptable for the mathematical description of the concentration-time decay curve. The impact of the fitting procedure on the reported GFR has not been questioned.We defined 8 different fitting procedures to calculate the area under the curve, and from this area under the curve, the GFR. We applied the 8 fitting methods (all considering a full concentration-time curve) on the multiple sample data (8 samples) of 20 children diagnosed with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. We evaluated the effect (variability) on the reported GFR from the different fitting methods and compared these results with GFR-values calculated from late samples only (samples after 120 minutes) and from one-sample methods.In 6 out of 20 cases, the fitting methods on the full concentration-time curve resulted in very different reported GFR-values, mainly because some methods were not able to fit the data, or methods resulted in GFR-values ranging from 0 to 120 mL/min. The reported GFR-result therefore strongly depends on the fitting method, making the full concentration-time method less robust than expected. Compared with a consensus reference GFR, the late sample models did not show fitting issues and may therefore be considered as more robust. Also the one-sample methods showed acceptable accuracy.The late sample methods (using 3 time-points) provide robust and reliable methods to determine GFR.

Glomerular filtration rate in children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection is best described by three-compartment iohexol model

BACKGROUND

Children with cancer and infection may develop glomerular hyperfiltration. With the aim to determine the prevalence of glomerular hyperfiltration in children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection, we developed population pharmacokinetic model of iohexol. We further aimed to assess the accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations and single- or two-point measured GFR (mGFR) formulas compared with GFR based on iohexol clearance from our population pharmacokinetic model (iGFR).

PROCEDURE

Hospitalised patients (0.5-25 years) with haemato-oncological disease and infection were included if their eGFR was ≥80 ml/min/1.73 m² at the screening visit. Iohexol plasma concentrations were described by population pharmacokinetic model. Bias, precision and accuracy of 23 eGFR equations and 18 mGFR formulas were calculated.

RESULTS

Total of 32 iohexol administrations were performed in 28 patients. Median (range) eGFR was 136 ml/min/1.73 m2 (74-234) and age 15.1 years (0.8-26.0). Three-compartment model with allometric scaling of central, one peripheral compartment and clearance (with power 0.75) to weight fitted the best. Median (range) iGFR was 103 ml/min/1.73 m² (68-140). All except one eGFR equation overestimated GFR. Lund-Malmö revised eGFR equation performed the best, followed by Gao equation. Of single- or two-point mGFR formulas, 15 overestimated iGFR. Modified Jacobsson formula at 5.5 hours performed the best, followed by Fleming formula at 3 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection, renal function is best described by iohexol clearance from three-compartment pharmacokinetic model, while eGFR equations and single- and two-point mGFR formulas overestimate iGFR.

Comparative study of plasma clearance of iohexol at different injection doses

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to compare the metabolic curves of plasma clearance of iohexol (Cl_IOH) at standard dose (5 ml) and contrast-level dose (50 ml).

METHODS

The concentration of iohexol was measured at fasting state and at nine different time periods after a single bolus of iohexol injection. The interval between the injection of the two doses was longer than 24 hrs. Using a multi-point method and a dual-sample method, Cl_IOH-M and Cl_IOH-D were calculated, and the correlation and consistency of Cl_IOH between the two doses were compared.

RESULTS

The metabolic curves of iohexol at the 5 ml and 50 ml injection were substantially identical. The correlation of Cl_IOH-M between the two doses was 0.930, the mean deviation was 1.3 ± 6.9 ml/min/1.73 m². Taking Cl_IOH-5ml-M as the standard, the Cl_IOH-50ml-D at 2 h and 4 h had a correlation coefficient of 0.975, a mean deviation of 0.1 ± 5.3 ml/min/1.73 m², and the concordances were 100% corresponding to P₃₀, 88.9% corresponding to P₁₀, and 77.8% corresponding to P₅.

CONCLUSION

When a regular dose of iohexol is used for enhanced CT, Cl_IOH can be used for the measurement of GFR, and a proper time for blood collection can be 2 h and 4 h.

Accuracy of single intravenous access iohexol GFR in children is hampered by marker contamination

Measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children by iohexol injection and blood sampling from the contralateral arm is widely used. A single intravenous access for iohexol injection and subsequent blood sampling has the obvious advantages of being less painful and easier to perform. The purpose of our study was to determine if blood samples drawn from the injection access are feasible and accurate for iohexol GFR (iGFR) measurements. Thirty-one children, median age 10.5 (range 6–17) years, with chronic kidney disease were given a bolus of iohexol followed by extended saline flushing and subsequent venous blood samples collected from the injection access as well as from a cannula in the contralateral arm, the latter serving as the reference method. Paired venous blood samples were collected at four time points (2, 3, 3.5 and 4 h) after the iohexol bolus. Blood sample discarding preceded and saline flushing followed each blood sampling to avoid marker contamination. iGFR based on samples drawn from the injection access at 2 and 3 h showed significantly lower iGFR than measurement from the contralateral arm (p < 0.01). Singlepoint iGFR did not differ significantly after 3–4 repeated procedures of blood discarding and saline flusing (3.5 and 4 h). Despite thorough saline flushing there is still a relatively high risk of falsely low iGFR due to marker contamination in blood samples from the injection site. Hence, blood sampling from a second intravenous access is recommended for routine iohexol GFR measurements in children.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01092260, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01092260?term=tondel&rank=2.

Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate: effect of different ways to calculate the area under the curve

BACKGROUND

Measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using iohexol plasma clearance has been proposed as the preferred way for GFR determination. The extended multiple-sample protocol is based on fitting the full concentration-time decay-curve, and from the obtained fit-parameters, the area under the curve (AUC) and GFR (the injected dose divided by the AUC) were calculated. The goal of the current study is to evaluate the impact of different fitting procedures on the precision of GFR-results obtained from the full concentration-time curve, and compare these results with those obtained with simplified multiple-samples and single-sample protocols.

METHODS

The concentration-time curves of 8 samples at times 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240 and 300 min after bolus injection of iohexol of 570 adults, aged 70+, from the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS), were analysed. The fit-parameters for the two-compartment model (double-exponential decay curve), and from these, the AUC and GFR were obtained with 8 different fitting procedures.

RESULTS

The two-compartmental non-linear least squares fitting procedure showed the best accuracy (541 out of 570 reported GFR-results were within 5% of the majority of the 8 fitting methods). The two-compartmental slope-intercept fitting procedure was not always applicable and the non-compartmental fitting procedures did not always allow to calculate the GFR. All correction formulas for the simplified late multiple-samples methods showed acceptable accuracy and precision with a preference for Ng's correction formula (Lin's CCC = 0.992, bias = 0.5 ± 2.5). Jacobsson's iterative method was the best one-sample method, with Lin's CCC = 0.983 and bias = - 0.6 ± 3.4.

CONCLUSION

The fitting procedure has an important impact on the precision of the calculated AUC and GFR. The simplified late-sample protocols and one-sample methods did not suffer from fitting problems and showed acceptable equivalence when compared to the full compartment GFR-results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The "Berlin Initiative Study" is officially registered with the German Register for Clinical Studies ("Deutschen Register Klinischer Studien"(DRKS)) under registration number DRKS00017058 , since April 12, 2019, and it is also visible on the WHO clinical trials registry platform (within the next 4 weeks after the registration date).

Comparison of iohexol plasma clearance formulas vs. inulin urinary clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate

OBJECTIVES

The one-compartment iohexol plasma clearance has been proposed as a reliable alternative to renal inulin clearance. However, this method's performance depends on the formula used to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study reports on performance comparisons between various mathematical formulas proposed for iohexol plasma clearance vs. inulin urinary clearance.

METHODS

GFR was simultaneously determined by inulin and iohexol clearance in 144 participants (age: 10-84 years; glomerular filtration rate: 15-169 mL/min/1.73 m²). A retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the performance of four formulas proposed to calculate plasma iohexol clearance (Brøchner-Mortensen, Fleming et al., Jødal-Brøchner-Mortensen, and Ng-Schwartz-Munoz). The performance of each formula was assessed using bias, precision (standard deviation of the bias), accuracy (percentage iohexol within 5, 10, and 15%), root mean square error, and concordance correlation coefficient vs. renal inulin clearance as reference.

RESULTS

Regarding accuracy, there was no difference in root mean square error (RMSE), P₅, P₁₀, or P₁₅ between the four formulas. The four concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) between the value from each formula and in-GFR were high and not significantly different. At in-GFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m², Ng-Schwartz-Munoz formula performed slightly better than other formulas regarding median bias (-0.5; 95% CI [-3.0 to 2.0] and accuracy P₁₅ (95.0; 95% CI [88.0-100.0]).

CONCLUSIONS

The studied formulas were found equivalent in terms of precision and accuracy, but the Ng-Schwartz-Munoz formula improved the accuracy at higher levels of in-GFR.

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 in Children with Chronic Kidney Disease and after Renal Transplantation

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of our study was to evaluate plasma and urinary levels of GDF-15 after pediatric renal transplantation (Rtx) and in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its associations to cardiovascular risk factors. In this cross-sectional study, GDF-15 was measured in plasma and urine from 53 children with a renal transplant and 83 children with CKD and related to cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, obesity, and cholesterol) and kidney function. Forty healthy children served as a control group. Plasma levels of GDF-15 (median and range) for a Tx (transplantation) cohort, CKD cohort, and healthy controls were, respectively, 865 ng/L (463-3039 ng/L), 508 ng/L (183-3279 ng/L), and 390 ng/L (306-657 ng/L). The CKD and Tx cohorts both had significantly higher GDF-15 levels than the control group (p < 0.001). Univariate associations between GDF-15 and hyperuricemia (p < 0.001), elevated triglycerides (p = 0.028), low HDL (p = 0.038), and obesity (p = 0.028) were found. However, mGFR (p < 0.001) and hemoglobin (p < 0.001) were the only significant predictors of GDF-15 in an adjusted analysis. Urinary GDF-15/creatinine ratios were 448 ng/mmol (74-5013 ng/mmol) and 540 ng/mmol (5-14960 ng/mmol) in the Tx cohort and CKD cohort, respectively. In the CKD cohort, it was weakly correlated to mGFR (r = -0.343, p = 0.002). Plasma levels of GDF-15 are elevated in children with CKD and after Rtx. The levels were not associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors but strongly associated with renal function.

Comparative physiology of glomerular filtration rate by plasma clearance of exogenous creatinine and exo-iohexol in six different avian species

Early diagnosis of kidney diseases in avian species is limited. Endogenous markers currently used in avian practice are not sensitive enough to identify early kidney failure. Consequently, alternative markers should be evaluated. To be able to evaluate these alternative markers, an accurate marker to estimate the GFR should be validated. This study determined the GFR, measured as clearance of exogenous creatinine and exo-iohexol, in six different bird species, i.e. broiler chickens, laying chickens, turkeys, Muscovy ducks, pigeons and African grey parrots (4♀/4♂). To be able to compare the six bird species, normalization to bodyweight (BW) of the GFR was performed, after a good correlation between BW and kidney weight was demonstrated (R² = 0.9836). Clearance of exo-iohexol normalized to BW (mL/min/kg) was determined in all bird species, i.e. 3.09 in broiler chickens; 2.57 in laying chickens; 1.94 in turkeys; 1.29 in pigeons; 2.60 in ducks and 1.11 in parrots. However, these results differed significantly with the clearance of exogenous creatinine: 8.41 in broiler chickens; 9.33 in laying chickens; 5.62 in turkeys; 14.97 in pigeons; 17.59 in ducks and 25.56 in parrots 25.56. Iohexol is preferred to measure the GFR, since it is not prone to tubular reabsorption nor secretion.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in children: evaluation of creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by creatinine- and/or cystatin C-based equations (eGFR) is widely used in daily practice. The purpose of our study was to compare new and old eGFR equations with measured GFR (mGFR) by iohexol clearance in a cohort of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We examined 96 children (median age 9.2 years (range 0.25-17.5)) with CKD stages 1-5. A 7-point iohexol clearance (GFR7p) was defined as the reference method (median mGFR 66 mL/min/1.73 m², range 6-153). Ten different eGFR equations, with or without body height, were evaluated: Schwartz_bedside, Schwartz_CKiD, Schwartz_cysC, CAPA, LM_REV, (LM_REV + CAPA) / 2, FAS_crea, FAS_cysC, FAS_combi, FAS_height. The accuracy was evaluated with percentage within 10 and 30% of GFR7p (P10 and P30).

RESULTS

In the group with mGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m², the Schwartz_cysC equation had the lowest median bias (interquartile range; IQR) 3.27 (4.80) mL/min/1.73 m² and the highest accuracy with P10 of 44% and P30 of 85%. In the group with mGFR above 60 mL/min/1.73 m², the Schwartz_CKiD presented with the lowest bias 3.41 (13.1) mL/min/1.73 m² and P10 of 62% and P30 of 98%. Overall, the Schwartz_cysC had the lowest bias - 1.49 (13.5) mL/min/1.73 m² and both Schwartz_cysC and Schwartz_CKiD showed P30 of 90%. P10 was 44 and 48%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Schwartz_cysC and the combined Schwartz_CKiD present with lower bias and higher accuracy as compared to the other equations. The Schwartz_cysC equation is a good height-independent alternative to the Schwartz_CKiD equation in children and can be reported directly by the laboratory information system.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , Identifier NCT01092260, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01092260?term=tondel&rank=2.