Rituximab for very low dose steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children: a randomized controlled study

Long Term Evaluations of First Single-dose Rituximab in Children with Steroid-Dependent Minimal-Change Nephrotic Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To explore the long-term efficacy and safety of the first single dose of rituximab in children with steroid-dependent minimal-change nephrotic syndrome (SD-MCNS) over a two-year period after infusion.

METHODS

A 2-year retrospective observational study was performed on children with SD-MCNS who received the first single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m2) from October 2011 to December 2018.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients (median age 8.17 years) were included. The efficacy of the first single-dose rituximab in children with SD-MCNS was 90.91% (70/77). An overall relapse rate of 78.33% was achieved. Older age at rituximab treatment onset (>8.46 years), a lower steroid-dependent dosage (<18.76 mg/m2·d) and a higher CD4+ T-cell count before rituximab treatment (>31.22%) were positively related to treatment efficacy (p < 0.05). Male sex, younger age at rituximab treatment onset, a higher IgE level before rituximab treatment, and a higher white blood cell count and CD3+ T-cell count at the time of steroid withdrawal were associated with disease relapse (p < 0.05). A model for predicting relapse after rituximab treatment in SD-MCNS patients was established.

CONCLUSIONS

The first single-dose rituximab treatment for children with SD-MCNS was effective and safe. Greater efficacy was observed in patients who were older at rituximab treatment onset, had a lower steroid-dependent dosage, or had a higher CD4+ T-cell count before rituximab treatment. In contrast, younger male patients with a higher IgE level experienced an increased occurrence of relapse.

Rituximab Administration to Treat Nephrotic Syndrome in Children: 2-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) significantly affect children's quality of life. There are frequent relapses in SSNS and progression in SRNS. IPNA guidelines suggest that monoclonal antibodies like rituximab (RTX) are promising treatments.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of rituximab administration in children with SSNS, encompassing FRNS and SDNS, and SRNS over a two-year follow-up period, facilitating individualized management.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized, and patient-oriented study (RICHNESS), involving children aged 3-18 with SRNS (18) and SSNS (11) undergoing 2 years continuous RTX therapy. The primary outcome was complete/partial remission (CR/PR), as defined by IPNA/KDIGO guidelines, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months on RTX; secondary outcomes included adverse events. Key endpoints included the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), CD20 levels, IgG levels, and the incidence of infections. Kidney biopsies were performed in 94% of SRNS patients. RTX was administered every 6-9 months, depending on CD20 levels, IgG levels, and the presence of infections. The eGFR and ACR were assessed every 6 months.

RESULTS

Some 31 children were selected for RTX treatment. Overall, 2 experienced severe allergic reactions, leading to their exclusion from the final analysis of 29 children. In the SSNS group, all children achieved and maintained complete remission within 2 years. Remission rates in the SRNS group ranged from 39% (RR 0.78; 95% CI: 16.4-61.4%, NNT 9) at the 6th month to 72% (RR 1.44; 95% CI: 51.5-92.9%) over the 2-year follow-up period due to continuous RTX therapy. The median duration of RTX use was 26.1 months, with a median cumulative dose of 1820 mg/m2. Adverse reactions and complications were presented by mild infusion-related reactions in 3 children (10.3%), severe allergic reactions in 2 children (6.2%), hypogammaglobulinemia in 7 children (24%), infections in 3 children (10.3%), severe destructive pneumonia in 1 child, recurrent respiratory infections in 2 children, and neutropenia in 1 child (3.44%).

CONCLUSIONS

RTX was tolerated well, and proved highly effective as a steroid-sparing agent, offering potential in terms of stopping relapses and minimizing steroid-related side effects. It also demonstrated efficacy in slowing progression in SRNS, indicating potential for use in ACR reduction and renal function restoration, but requires careful use given potential severe allergic reactions and infectious complications. Further studies should focus on long-term cost-effectiveness and deferred side effects.

Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

About 80% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) have relapses. Of these children, half will relapse frequently, and are at risk of adverse effects from corticosteroids. While non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications prolong periods of remission, they have significant potential adverse effects. Currently, there is no consensus about the most appropriate second-line agent in children with frequently relapsing SSNS. In addition, these medications could be used with corticosteroids in the initial episode of SSNS to prolong the period of remission. This is the fifth update of a review first published in 2001 and updated in 2005, 2008, 2013 and 2020.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications in SSNS in children with a relapsing course of SSNS and in children with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to October 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were included if they involved children with SSNS and compared non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications with placebo, corticosteroids or no treatment; different non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications, or different doses, durations or routes of administration of the same non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data from the included studies. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 58 studies (122 reports) randomising 3720 children. Half were multicentre studies, and most studies were undertaken in South and East Asia (28 studies) and Europe (20 studies). The numbers of children randomised ranged from 14 to 211. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 32 and 33 studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment, respectively. Eleven studies were at low risk of performance bias and 13 were at low risk of detection bias. Forty-eight and 36 studies were at low risk of incomplete and selective reporting, respectively. Rituximab with or without prednisone compared with placebo with or without prednisone probably reduces the number of children experiencing relapse at six months (5 studies, 182 children: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.43) and 12 months (3 studies, 108 children: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.09) (moderate certainty), may increase the number with severe infusion reactions (4 studies, 162 children: RR 5.21, 95% CI 1.19 to 22.89; low certainty), but not severe infection or arthropathy (low certainty). Rituximab compared with tacrolimus probably reduces the risk of relapse at 12 months (4 studies, 238 children: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96) and may reduce the risk of relapse when compared with low dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1 study, 30 children: RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.62). Rituximab followed by MMF for 500 days reduces the risk of relapse compared with rituximab followed by placebo for 500 days (1 study, 78 children: RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.63; high certainty). Rituximab probably does not differ from ofatumumab in the riisk of relapse and 12 months (1 study, 140 children: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.41; moderate certainty) or in adverse events. MMF and levamisole (1 study, 149 children: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16) may have similar effects on the number of children who relapse at 12 months (low certainty). Cyclosporin compared with MMF may reduce the risk of relapse at 12 months (3 studies, 114 children: RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.30) (low certainty). Levamisole compared with steroids or placebo may reduce the number of children with relapse during treatment (8 studies, 474 children: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.82) (low certainty). Preliminary data from single studies indicate that levamisole and prednisone compared with prednisone alone may delay the onset of relapse after the initial episode of SSNS and that levamisole compared with increasing prednisone administration from alternate day to daily at the onset of infection may reduce the risk of relapse with infection (low certainty). Cyclosporin compared with prednisone may reduce the number of children who relapse (1 study, 104 children: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.83) (low certainty). Alkylating agents compared with cyclosporin may make little or no difference to the risk of relapse during cyclosporin treatment (2 studies, 95 children: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.48) (low certainty evidence) but may reduce the risk of relapse at 12 to 24 months (2 studies, 95 children: RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.74) (low certainty). Alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil) compared with prednisone probably reduce the number of children who experience relapse at six to 12 months (6 studies, 202 children: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.60) and at 12 to 24 months (4 studies, 59 children: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.46) (moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

New studies incorporated in this review update indicate that rituximab compared with prednisone, tacrolimus, or MMF is a valuable additional agent for managing children with relapsing SSNS. Comparative studies of CNIs, MMF, and levamisole suggest that CNIs may be more effective than MMF and that levamisole may be similar in efficacy to MMF. Important new studies suggest that MMF prolongs remission following rituximab, that levamisole may prevent infection-related relapse more effectively than changing from alternate-day to daily prednisone and that levamisole and prednisone compared with prednisone alone may prolong the time to first relapse. There are currently 23 ongoing studies which should improve our understanding of how to treat children with frequently relapsing SSNS.

Predictive factors of long-term disease remission after rituximab administration in patients with childhood-onset complicated steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that rituximab (RTX)-associated adverse events may be relatively frequent in younger patients, recent studies have reported RTX as a suitable first-line steroid-sparing agent for maintaining remission in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, the impact of age at RTX initiation on the long-term outcome remains unknown in this cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of 61 patients with complicated SDNS who received a single dose of RTX (375 mg/m2) followed by maintenance immunosuppressive agents (IS) from January 2008 to March 2021. In patients who achieved > 12 months of prednisolone-free remission, IS tapering within 6 months was tried to achieve. The primary endpoint was the probability of achieving long-term treatment-free remission at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

After RTX initiation, 52 patients (85.2%) relapsed after a median of 665 days, and 44 patients (72.1%) received additional RTX doses (total, 226 infusions). At the last follow-up (median observation period, 8.3 years; median age, 18.3 years), 16 patients (26.2%) achieved long-term remission. Multivariate analysis showed that older age at RTX initiation was the independent predictive factor for achieving long-term remission (odds ratio, 1.25; p < 0.05). The proportion of those who achieved long-term remission was significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 13.5 years than in those aged < 13.5 years at RTX initiation (52.6 vs 14.3%, p < 0.05). Persistent severe hypogammaglobulinemia did not develop in older children (≥ 13.5 years) at RTX initiation.

CONCLUSION

For older children with complicated SDNS, RTX appeared to be a suitable disease-modifying therapy without persistent adverse events.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Tacrolimus in Children With Steroid Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

Introduction

In the Rituximab for Relapse Prevention in Nephrotic Syndrome (RITURNS) trial, we demonstrated superior efficacy of single-course rituximab over maintenance tacrolimus in preventing relapses in children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) during a 1-year observation. Here we present the long-term outcomes of all 117 trial completers, who were followed up for another 2 years.

Methods

Relapsing patients in the rituximab arm received a second course of rituximab, either with (n = 44) or without mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) cotreatment (n = 15). In the tacrolimus arm, second line rituximab monotherapy was initiated after relapses (n = 32) or electively (n = 24).

Results

All 12-month relapse-free patients in the rituximab arm relapsed in the second postexposure year, resulting in similar median relapse-free survival times in the 2 trial arms (62 vs. 59 weeks). Second line rituximab in the tacrolimus arm was less effective than first-line therapy in patients switched to rituximab following a relapse (relapse-free survival 55 vs. 63 weeks, P < 0.01). B-cell counts 6 months post-rituximab predicted relapse risk both for first and second line therapy. MMF cotreatment yielded much improved 2-year relapse-free survival as compared to rituximab monotherapy (67% vs. 9%, P < 0.0001). Higher grade 2 adverse event rates were observed post-rituximab versus on tacrolimus (0.87 vs. 0.53 per year).

Conclusion

The superior therapeutic effect of rituximab in SDNS vanishes during the second year post-exposure. Rituximab appears to yield longer remission when applied as first line as compared to second line therapy. Maintenance MMF following rituximab induces long-term disease remission.

Repetitive administration of rituximab can achieve and maintain clinical remission in patients with MCD or FSGS

Minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are glomerulopathies associated with nephrotic syndrome. Primary forms of these diseases are treated with various regimes of immunosuppression. Frequently relapsing or glucocorticoid-dependent courses remain challenging. Here, a B-cell-depleting strategy with rituximab represents a salvage option although data are sparse in the adult population. In particular, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of restoring remission after initial successful treatment with rituximab and whether patients benefit from an individualized, relapse-based approach. We identified 13 patients who received multiple therapies with rituximab from the FOrMe-registry (NCT03949972), a nationwide registry for MCD and FSGS in Germany, or from the University Hospital of Cologne. Disease status, changes in serum creatinine, proteinuria, and time to relapse were evaluated. Relapse-free survival was compared to the patients' previous therapy regimens. Through all treatment cycles, an improvement of disease activity was shown leading to a complete remission in 72% and partial remission in 26% after 3 ([Formula: see text]0.001) and 6 months ([Formula: see text]0.001). Relapse-free survival increased from 4.5 months (95%-CI 3-10 months) to 21 months (95%-CI 16-32 months) ([Formula: see text]0.001) compared to previous immunosuppression regimens with no loss in estimated glomerular filtration over time (p = 0.53). Compared to continuous B-cell depletion, an individualized relapse-based approach led to a reduced rituximab exposure and significant cost savings. Relapse-based administration of rituximab in patients with MCD/FSGS with an initial good clinical response did not result in a decreased efficacy at a median follow-up duration of 110 months. Thus, reinduction therapies may provide an alternative to continuous B-cell-depletion and reduce the long-term side effects of continuous immunosuppression.

IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most frequent pediatric glomerular disease, affecting from 1.15 to 16.9 per 100,000 children per year globally. It is characterized by massive proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, and/or concomitant edema. Approximately 85-90% of patients attain complete remission of proteinuria within 4-6 weeks of treatment with glucocorticoids, and therefore, have steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). Among those patients who are steroid sensitive, 70-80% will have at least one relapse during follow-up, and up to 50% of these patients will experience frequent relapses or become dependent on glucocorticoids to maintain remission. The dose and duration of steroid treatment to prolong time between relapses remains a subject of much debate, and patients continue to experience a high prevalence of steroid-related morbidity. Various steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drugs have been used in clinical practice; however, there is marked practice variation in the selection of these drugs and timing of their introduction during the course of the disease. Therefore, international evidence-based clinical practice recommendations (CPRs) are needed to guide clinical practice and reduce practice variation. The International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) convened a team of experts including pediatric nephrologists, an adult nephrologist, and a patient representative to develop comprehensive CPRs on the diagnosis and management of SSNS in children. After performing a systematic literature review on 12 clinically relevant PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions, recommendations were formulated and formally graded at several virtual consensus meetings. New definitions for treatment outcomes to help guide change of therapy and recommendations for important research questions are given.

New and Old Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies for Nephrotic Syndrome. Where We Are?

Nephrotic proteinuria is the hallmark of several glomerulonephritis determined by different pathogenetic mechanisms, including autoimmune, degenerative and inflammatory. Some conditions such as Minimal Change Nephropathy (MCN) and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are of uncertain pathogenesis. Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been used with success in a part of proteinuric conditions while some are resistant. New human and humanized monoclonal anti-CD 20 antibodies offer some advantages based on stronger effects on CD20 cell subtypes and have been already administered in hematology and oncology areas as substitutes of chimeric molecules. Here, we revised the literature on the use of human and humanized anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies in different proteinuric conditions, resulting effective in those conditions resistant to rituximab. Literature on the use of human anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies in different proteinuric diseases is mainly limited to ofatumumab, with several protocols and doses. Studies already performed with ofatumumab given in standard doses of 1,500 mg 1.73m² suggest no superiority compared to rituximab in children and young adults with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. Ofatumumab given in very high doses (300 mg/1.73m² followed by five infusion 2,000 mg/1.73 m²) seems more effective in patients who are not responsive to common therapies. The question of dose remains unresolved and the literature is not concordant on positive effects of high dose ofatumumab in patients with FSGS prior and after renal transplantation. Obinutuzumab may offer some advantages. In the unique study performed in patients with multidrug dependent nephrotic syndrome reporting positive effects, obinutuzumab was associated with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab proposing the unexplored frontier of combined therapies. Obinutuzumab represent an evolution also in the treatment of autoimmune glomerulonephritis, such as membranous nephrotahy and lupus nephritis. Results of randomized trials, now in progress, are awaited to add new possibilities in those cases that are resistant to other drugs. The aim of the present review is to open a discussion among nephrologists, with the hope to achieve shared approaches in terms of type of antibodies and doses in the different proteinuric renal conditions.

Mycophenolate Mofetil after Rituximab for Childhood-Onset Complicated Frequently-Relapsing or Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is the standard therapy for childhood-onset complicated frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). However, most patients redevelop FRNS/SDNS after peripheral B cell recovery.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) administration after rituximab can prevent treatment failure (FRNS, SDNS, steroid resistance, or use of immunosuppressive agents or rituximab). In total, 39 patients (per group) were treated with rituximab, followed by either MMF or placebo until day 505 (treatment period). The primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF) throughout the treatment and follow-up periods (until day 505 for the last enrolled patient).

RESULTS

TTFs were clinically but not statistically significantly longer among patients given MMF after rituximab than among patients receiving rituximab monotherapy (median, 784.0 versus 472.5 days, hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34 to 1.05, log-rank test: P=0.07). Because most patients in the MMF group presented with treatment failure after MMF discontinuation, we performed a post-hoc analysis limited to the treatment period and found that MMF after rituximab prolonged the TTF and decreased the risk of treatment failure by 80% (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.50). Moreover, MMF after rituximab reduced the relapse rate and daily steroid dose during the treatment period by 74% and 57%, respectively. The frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of MMF after rituximab may sufficiently prevent the development of treatment failure and is well tolerated, although the relapse-preventing effect disappears after MMF discontinuation.

Efficacy of rituximab therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome: a 10-year experience from an Iranian pediatric hospital

Background

There are controversy results in the optimal management of children with steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SDNS, SRNS). This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in these pediatric patients.

Methods

Medical records of 1–18-year-old Iranian children with SDNS (n = 26) and SRNS (n = 22) with a follow-up for at least 24 months were included from 2009 to 2019. The short- and long-term responses to RTX were respectively evaluated to determine the random protein-to-creatinine ratio after 6 and 24 months and classified as complete (CR) and partial (PR) remission or no response.

Results

Male patients (n = 26) were slightly predominate. The median age of patients at the time of RTX therapy was 8.6 ± 4.01 years. At the end of the 6-month follow-up, CR and PR occurred in 23 (47.9%) and 12 (25%) patients, respectively. Of 23 patients with CR, 18 (69.2%) and 5(22.7%) had SDNS and SRNS, respectively (p < 0.005). However, only 18 (37.5%) of patients after 24 months had been in CR. No significant difference in the CR rate was found between the two groups. RTX was more effective when administered during the proteinuria-free period (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In the short term, RTX significantly was efficient in inducing complete or PR in SDNS and SRNS patients. However, the favorable response rate in a long-term follow-up was insignificantly lower between the two groups.

Efficacy of rituximab versus tacrolimus in difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: an open-label pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Rituximab and tacrolimus are therapies reserved for patients with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome who have failed conventional steroid-sparing agents. Given their toxicities, demonstrating non-inferiority of rituximab to tacrolimus may enable choice between these medications.

METHODS

This investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label, pilot randomized controlled trial examined the non-inferiority of two doses of intravenous (IV) rituximab given one-week apart to oral therapy with tacrolimus (1:1 allocation), in maintaining sustained remission over 12 months follow-up, in patients with difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, defined as frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent disease that had failed ≥ 2 steroid-sparing strategies. Secondary outcomes included frequency of relapses, proportion with frequent relapses, time to relapse and frequent relapses, and adverse events (CTRI/2018/11/016342).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable for 41 patients randomized to receive rituximab (n = 21) or tacrolimus (n = 20). While 55% of patients in each limb were in sustained remission at 1 year, non-inferiority of rituximab to tacrolimus was not demonstrated (mean difference 0%; 95% CI - 30.8%, 30.8%; non-inferiority limit - 20%; P = 0.50). Frequent relapses were more common in patients administered rituximab compared to tacrolimus (risk difference 30%, 95% CI 7.0, 53.0, P = 0.023). Both groups showed similar reductions in relapse rates and prednisolone use. Common adverse events were infusion-related with rituximab and gastrointestinal symptoms with tacrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with rituximab was not shown to be non-inferior to 12-months treatment with tacrolimus in maintaining remission in patients with difficult-to-treat steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Frequent relapses were more common with rituximab. While effective, both agents require close monitoring for adverse events. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Randomised controlled trial comparing rituximab to mycophenolate mofetil in children and young adults with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids induce remission in 90% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). Some become steroid-dependent (SD) and require the addition of steroid sparing drugs such as calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) or cyclophosphamide, to maintain remission. Considering the toxicity of these drugs, alternative interventions are needed for long-term treatment. The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has shown promising steroid-sparing properties, with conflicting results in complicated forms of SD-INS. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) resulted effective in maintaining free-steroid remission, however, studies are limited to few uncontrolled trials with reported different dose of MMF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This open-label, two-parallel-arm, superiority controlled randomised clinical trial will enrol children with SD-INS maintained in remission with oral glucocorticoids or CNI. Children and young adults will be randomised to either MMF (1.200 mg/m²) or rituximab (375 mg/m²) infusion. After enrolment, glucocorticoids will be tapered until complete withdrawal. We will enrol 160 children and young adults to detect as significant at the two-sided p value of 0.01 with a power >0.8 a reduction in the risk of 1-year relapse (primary end-point). As secondary endpoints, we will compare the amount of glucocorticoids required to maintain complete remission at 6 and 24 months.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was approved by the local ethics boards (Comitato Etico Regione Liguria CER Liguria https://www.portalericerca-liguria.it/). We will publish the study results at international scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT004585152.

Human or Chimeric Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibodies for Children with Nephrotic Syndrome: A Superiority Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is effective in steroid-dependent and calcineurin inhibitor-dependent forms of nephrotic syndrome, but many patients relapse at 1 year. Because ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has a more extended binding site and higher affinity to CD20 compared with rituximab, it might offer superior efficacy in these patients.

METHODS

We designed a single-center randomized clinical trial to compare the long-term efficacy of ofatumumab versus rituximab in children and young adults with nephrotic syndrome maintained in remission with prednisone and calcineurin inhibitors. We randomized 140 children and young adults (aged 2-24 years) to receive intravenous ofatumumab (1.50 mg/1.73 m²) or rituximab (375 mg/m²). After infusions, oral drugs were tapered and withdrawn within 60 days. The primary outcome was relapse at 1 year, which was analyzed following the intent-to-treat principle. The secondary endpoint was relapse within 24 months from infusion, on the basis of urine dipstick and confirmed by a urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <200.

RESULTS

At 12 months, 37 of 70 (53%) participants who received ofatumumab experienced relapse versus 36 of 70 (51%) who received rituximab (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.55 to 2.06). At 24 months, 53 of 70 (76%) participants who received ofatumumab experienced relapse, versus 46 of 70 (66%) who received rituximab (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.8 to 3.3). The two groups exhibited comparable B cell subpopulation reconstitution and did not differ in adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of ofatumumab was not superior to a single dose of rituximab in maintaining remission in children with steroid-dependent and calcineurin inhibitor-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02394119) and https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search (2015-000624-28).

The Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab for Childhood Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: Rituximab (RTX), a possible alternative treatment option, is recognized as a new therapeutic hope for the treatment of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) in children. However, the efficacy and safety of RTX in the treatment of childhood SDNS are still controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX treatment in children with SDNS. Study Design: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective comparative control study data from studies, performed before January 2021 were collected, from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. The studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of RTX in childhood SDNS were included. Results: Six RCTs and one retrospective comparative control study were included in our analysis. Compared with the control group, the RTX treatment group achieved a higher complete remission rate (OR = 5.21; 95% CI, 3.18-8.54; p < 0.00001), and we found significant differences between the two groups on serum albumin level (MD = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.43-1.33; p = 0.0001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (MD = 6.43; 95% CI, 2.68-10.19; p = 0.0008). However, RTX treatment did not significantly lower serum creatinine levels nor did it significantly reduce the occurrence of proteinuria. In addition, we found no advantages with RTX on treatment safety. Conclusions: RTX has shown satisfactory characteristics in terms of efficacy and may be a promising treatment method for SDNS in children. However, the long-term effects have not been fully evaluated and should be further studied through randomized clinical trials.

Rituximab vs Low-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil in Recurrence of Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome in Children and Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This randomized clinical trial examines the superiority of a single dose of rituximab vs low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in preventing the recurrence of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome in children and young adults.