Levamisole therapy in corticosteroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

Immunosuppressive Agent Options for Primary Nephrotic Syndrome: A Review of Network Meta-Analyses and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Therapeutic options with immunosuppressive agents for glomerular diseases have widened with refinements to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines from 2012 to 2021. However, international guidelines do not necessarily match the reality in each country. Expensive therapies such as rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors are sometimes inaccessible to patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome due to cost or regulations. Under the Japanese medical insurance system, rituximab is accessible but still limited to steroid-dependent patients who developed idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in childhood. Based on international KDIGO guidelines and other national guidelines, possible applications of immunosuppressive agents for nephrotic syndrome are comprehensively examined in this review. While rituximab has become the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy for nephrotic syndrome, clinical trials have indicated that options such as cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate mofetil would be preferable. Given the rising number of patients with nephrotic syndrome worldwide, KDIGO guidelines mention the need for further consideration of cost-effectiveness. If the new option of rituximab is to be the first choice in combination with steroids for nephrotic syndrome, its cost-effectiveness should also be verified. Among the few studies examining the cost-effectiveness of treatments for nephrotic syndrome, administration of rituximab to young adults has been shown to be cost-beneficial, at least in Japan. However, further large-scale studies involving multiple facilities are needed to verify such findings. Network meta-analyses have concluded that the efficacy of rituximab remains controversial and confirmation through high-quality studies of large cohorts is needed. To this end, the mechanisms of action underlying immunosuppressive agents, both old and new, need to be understood and experience must be accumulated to evaluate possible effects and side effects.

"Clinical Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Levamisole Therapy in Frequently Relapsing and Steroid Dependent Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome" - A retrospective comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Children with Frequently relapsing (FR) or Steroid dependent (SD) Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) often develop side effects of corticosteroids. Various steroid-sparing agents are in practice, but only a few studies exist so far which have compared the safety and efficacy of these two commonly used agents.

METHODS

We did a retrospective medical records review of children with FRNS or SDNS who had Levamisole or MMF as a steroid-sparing agent with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The aim was to compare the course of our patients on MMF and Levamisole. Our primary objective was to determine the number of children in sustained remission and those with the infrequently relapsing course on Levamisole and MMF and, the median time to relapse in months in the two groups. The secondary objective was to compare time to first relapse and number of relapses in FRNS and SDNS group children on MMF and Levamisole.

RESULTS

A total of 88 children (34% female) with diagnosis FR/SDNS (44 each) were included in the study. Thirty-nine patients took Levamisole, while forty-nine received MMF therapy. The median age of presentation at the relapsing course was 4.2 years. The proportion of children with sustained remission or infrequent relapsing (IFR) course on MMF was 73.6%, compared to 48.71% on Levamisole (p-value 0.015). Also, the median time to first relapse was 12 months (24, 1.5) and 4.5 months (24, 1) on respective medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcome was superior in the MMF group than Levamisole, especially in SDNS patients, and also MMF was more efficacious in maintaining sustained remission. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Pediatric idiopathic steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: diagnosis and therapy -short version of the updated German best practice guideline (S2e) - AWMF register no. 166-001, 6/2020

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most frequent glomerular disease in children in most parts of the world. Children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) generally have a good prognosis regarding the maintenance of normal kidney function even in the case of frequent relapses. The course of SSNS is often complicated by a high rate of relapses and the associated side effects of repeated glucocorticoid (steroid) therapy. The following recommendations for the treatment of SSNS are based on the comprehensive consideration of published evidence by a working group of the German Society for Pediatric Nephrology (GPN) based on the systematic Cochrane reviews on SSNS and the guidelines of the KDIGO working group (Kidney Disease - Improving Global Outcomes).

Prevention of relapses with levamisole as adjuvant therapy in children with a first episode of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: study protocol for a double blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial (the LEARNS study)

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is characterised by a high relapse rate up to 80% after initial response to standard therapy with corticosteroids. Steroid toxicity is common and causes a great burden of disease that negatively influences the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recently, studies have shown that levamisole, an anthelminthic drug, significantly improves relapse-free survival in children with frequent relapses or steroid dependency. Compared with other steroid-sparing drugs, levamisole has relatively few side effects. We hypothesise that adding levamisole to standard therapy with corticosteroids in children with a first episode of INS will prevent relapses, decrease cumulative dosage of steroids used and improve HRQoL. This paper presents the study protocol for the LEARNS study (LEvamisole as Adjuvant therapy to Reduce relapses of Nephrotic Syndrome).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An international, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial will be conducted in 20 participating hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium. Participants (n=92) with a first episode of INS, aged 2-16 years, who achieve remission after 4 weeks of oral prednisolone will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either levamisole 2.5 mg/kg alternate day or placebo added to prednisolone (18-week tapering schedule) for a total of 24 weeks. Follow-up will be until 2 years after first presentation. Additionally, parents and/or children will fill out five HRQoL questionnaires. Primary outcome of the LEARNS study is occurrence of relapses within 12 months after first presentation. Secondary outcomes include time to first relapse, cumulative steroid dose after 2 years, safety parameters and quality of life scores.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee. Results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL6826, 2017-001025-41.

Levamisole in Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: Clinical Efficacy and Pathophysiological Aspects

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome is one of the most common pediatric glomerular diseases. Unfortunately, it follows a relapsing and remitting course in the majority of cases, with 50% of all cases relapsing once or even more often. Most children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond initially to steroid therapy, nevertheless repeated courses for patients with relapses induce significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses or steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment, such as cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, levamisole, or rituximab. To reduce the relapse rate, several drugs have been used. Among these, levamisole has been considered the least toxic and least expensive therapy. Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) showed that levamisole is effective in reducing the relapse risk in steroid sensitive forms of nephrotic syndrome with a low frequency of side effects. Levamisole is a synthetic imidazothiazole derivative with immune-modulatory properties. In this article, we review recent data from randomized trials and observational studies to assess the efficacy of levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: an open-label randomized controlled trial

Both levamisole and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prevent relapses in patients with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome; however, their efficacy has not been compared prospectively. This single-center, randomized, open-label trial enrolled 149 children ages 6-18 years with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive therapy with MMF (750-1000 mg/m² daily) or levamisole (2-2.5 mg/kg on alternate days) for 1 year; prednisolone was discontinued by 2-3 months. In intention-to-treat analyses, the frequency of relapse was similar between participants treated with MMF and levamisole (mean difference -0.29 relapses/patient-year; 95% confidence interval -0.65, 0.08). Relapse rates declined to almost one-third of baseline for both treatment groups. Therapy with MMF was not superior to levamisole in terms of the proportions of participants with sustained remission (40.8% vs. 34.2%), frequent relapses (14.5% vs. 16.4%), or treatment failure, a composite outcome of frequent relapses, steroid resistance, or significant steroid toxicity (15.8% vs. 20.6%). These outcomes were also similar in time to event analyses. Changes in anthropometry and blood pressure were similar between the groups, and the rates of adverse effects were low in both groups. Flow cytometry in 32 participants demonstrated similar proportions of B cells and CD4+, CD8+, T helper (Th)1, Th2, Th17, and T regulatory (Treg) cells during follow-up. Therapy with MMF was not superior to levamisole in the frequency of relapses, likelihood of sustained remission or corticosteroid sparing in children with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Registration CTRI/2012/02/002394.

Distinctive vasculopathy with systemic involvement due to levamisole long-term therapy: a case report

Background

Levamisole belongs to the antihelminthic class of drugs that are sometimes administered to patients with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, owing to its steroid-sparing effects. Neutropenia and skin lesions, compatible with vasculitis, have been reported as drug complications, but they are rarely associated with any systemic involvement.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 9-year-old Arab boy with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome who was treated with levamisole after his third relapse. The drug was initially well tolerated, but mild isolated neutropenia occurred 6 months after levamisole administration. This was followed by cutaneous vasculitis of both ears and the left cheek. The patient also developed hepatosplenomegaly and anemia. Levamisole was discontinued, and his disease remained in remission. All the systemic manifestations disappeared gradually over the course of 1 month. The patient remained in remission until 1 year after levamisole withdrawal, when clinical nephrosis recurred.

Conclusions

Despite levamisole’s being a useful drug for maintaining remission in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, patients on long-term levamisole therapy should be monitored closely to prevent serious complications that can easily be resolved by simple drug withdrawal.

A randomized clinical trial indicates that levamisole increases the time to relapse in children with steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Levamisole has been considered the least toxic and least expensive steroid-sparing drug for preventing relapses of steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (SSINS). However, evidence for this is limited as previous randomized clinical trials were found to have methodological limitations. Therefore, we conducted an international multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to reassess its usefulness in prevention of relapses in children with SSINS. The efficacy and safety of one year of levamisole treatment in children with SSINS and frequent relapses were evaluated. The primary analysis cohort consisted of 99 patients from 6 countries. Between 100 days and 12 months after the start of study medication, the time to relapse (primary endpoint) was significantly increased in the levamisole compared to the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.22 [95% confidence interval 0.11-0.43]). Significantly, after 12 months of treatment, six percent of placebo patients versus 26 percent of levamisole patients were still in remission. During this period, the most frequent serious adverse event (four of 50 patients) possibly related to levamisole was asymptomatic moderate neutropenia, which was reversible spontaneously or after treatment discontinuation. Thus, in children with SSINS and frequent relapses, levamisole prolonged the time to relapse and also prevented recurrence during one year of treatment compared to prednisone alone. However, regular blood controls are necessary for safety issues.

Levamisole in Frequently-relapsing and Steroid-dependent Nephrotic Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of levamisole in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) and steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) when administered on an alternate day ('initial therapy' in all cases) or daily basis ('rescue therapy' in whom alternate day therapy failed).

METHODS

The records of 95 children (age 1-18y) with FRNS (62) and SDNS (33), who were treated at the Pediatric nephrology clinic, and received levamisole therapy (maximum 2 y duration, between 2010-2013) with a follow-up period of minimum 1 y, were included.

RESULTS

Alternate day levamisole therapy was efficacious in 73.7% (n=70). The overall efficacy of levamisole therapy was 88.4% (n=84). Levamisole therapy decreased the mean (SD) number of relapses from 4.22 (0.46)/y to 1.35 (0.36)/y (P<0.01); and cumulative median (IQR) prednisolone dosage from 4200 (3200-4300) mg/m2 to 1100 (IQR 500-2900) mg/m2 (P<0.001). On a one-year follow up of the cases in whom levamisole therapy was efficacious during therapy (median 24 mo) (n=84), a frequently relapsing or steroid dependent course continued to persist in 48.8% (41), necessitating oral cyclophosphamide (n= 22) or mycophenolate mofetil (n=19).

CONCLUSION

Daily levamisole therapy was useful in 56% of children who demonstrated failure while on alternate day levamisole therapy, and could be a useful therapeutic option in FRNS and SDNS.

Efficacy of higher-dose levamisole in maintaining remission in steroid-dependant nephrotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Levamisole (LEV) has been used successfully on an alternate-day regime of 2.5 mg/kg in steroid-dependant nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) to maintain remission. This pilot study was carried out between 2010 and 2015 at a single center in Sri Lanka to evaluate the efficacy of LEV prescribed at 2.5 mg/kg daily, which is double the alternate-day dose.

METHODS

Sequential children with SDNS, relapsing more than twice in the preceding 12 months and previously treated with LEV and low-dose alternate-day prednisolone (0.1-0.6 mg/kg) were recruited to the study. This group received LEV (2.5 mg/kg) daily with the same dose of alternate-day prednisolone for 1 year. Urine protein excretion was recorded by parents on a daily basis, and the presence of 3+ proteinuria on 3 consecutive days was considered a relapse. Full blood counts and liver function tests were performed every 3 months to monitor for adverse effects.

RESULTS

Sixty-four children were enrolled into the study; six were excluded due to prescription of other immunosuppressive drugs. Median age was 7.9 years; 33 were boys. The number of relapse episodes was 163 [mean per patient 2.8 ± standard deviation (SD) 0.8] in patients on alternate-day LEV and 77 (mean 1.3 ± SD 0.9) for those on daily LEV during the 12-month period of observation. The P value 0.000 (according to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) was <0.001. No major adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription of daily LEV is effective and safe for maintaining SDNS remission.

Levamisole therapy in children with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a single-center experience

Introduction

Numerous studies suggest that levamisole, an antihelmintic agent with an immunomodulatory effect, reduces the number of relapses in children with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS). The aim of the study was to present a single center’s experience in treatment of FRNS and SDNS with levamisole.

Material and methods

Among 72 children with FRNS/SDNS treated in our department with levamisole in the years 1984-2011 we studied in detail 53 patients (mean age: 6.5 ±3.0 years), in whom the medication was administered for at least 6 months. In these 53 patients we evaluated: the course of the disease before levamisole, the renal biopsy result, medications used, prednisone dose on levamisole initiation, duration of levamisole treatment, time to first relapse and number of relapses on levamisole, and levamisole side effects.

Results

The duration of nephrotic syndrome was 3.4 ±2.9 years, and the number of relapses before levamisole treatment was 6.0 ±3.4. The dose of prednisone on initiation of levamisole treatment was 1.2 ±0.6 mg/kg/24 h, and the duration of levamisole treatment was 15.0 ±7.3 months. During levamisole treatment proteinuria relapsed in 34/53 (64.2%) children, and the time to first relapse was 8.8 ±8.1 months. During levamisole therapy relapses of the disease decreased significantly (2.7 ±2.0 vs. 1.8 ±2.1 relapses/year, p = 0.02). Time to first relapse correlated with total number of relapses (R = –0.59, p < 0.001) and number of relapses in one year during levamisole treatment (R = –0.60, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Levamisole is effective in reducing the number of relapses in children with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Early relapse of proteinuria on levamisole treatment in children with FRNS/SDNS suggests low efficacy of further treatment.

Efficacy of levamisole in children with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of hospital case records.

SETTING

Pediatric nephrology department of a tertiary referral pediatric hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

62 children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and 35 children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

Case records of children who were diagnosed as steroid-dependant or frequently-relapsing nephrotic syndrome from June 2004 to June 2011, were reviewed. Levamisole was given daily (2 mg/kg/d) along with tapering doses of alternate day steroids after remission on daily steroids.

RESULTS

Levamisole was effective in 77.3% children with a better (80.6%) efficacy in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. A total of 34 children completed 1 year follow-up post levamisole therapy. The cumulative mean (SD) steroid dose 1-year before therapy was 4109(1154) mg/m2 and 1-year post therapy was 661 (11) mg/m2 (P<0.001). The relapses were also less during the period of post-levamisole therapy.

CONCLUSION

Levamisole is an effective alternative therapy in frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

Short- and long-term efficacy of levamisole as adjunctive therapy in childhood nephrotic syndrome

Many children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (NS) have significant sequelae despite steroid-sparing therapies. Levamisole may reduce short-term relapse frequency (RF) with minimal side effects. Little data exist, however, as to its long-term effect. To assess both short- and long-term efficacy in NS, RF and cumulative annual steroid burden were quantified in ten consecutive children with steroid-dependent NS treated with levamisole. Data were analyzed for three time periods: 1 year prior to levamisole therapy (Pre-Lev), during 1 year of levamisole therapy (During-Lev), and the year after cessation of all levamisole therapy (Off-Lev). Median RF fell from 6.0 (4.0-9.0) relapses/patient per year Pre-Lev to 0.0 (0.0-4.0) During-Lev (p = 0.002) with 6/10 patients having no relapse and 0.5 (0.0-8.0) Off-Lev (p = 0.01) with 5/10 patients without relapse. Concurrently, cumulative annual steroid burden fell from 6,067 (1,660-8,691) mg/m(2) per year Pre-Lev to 2,920 (782-5,271) During-Lev (p = 0.002) and 716 (0-3,637) Off-Lev (p = 0.002). In 4/5 hypertensive children, blood pressure normalized During-Lev. Somatic indices also improved: height Z scores, which fell from 0.8 (-2.4 to 3.6) at diagnosis to -0.6 (-2.7 to 0.4) Pre-Lev (p = 0.004), remained stable at -0.6 (-3.0 to 0.6) after 1 year of therapy and -0.5 (-2.6 to 0.2) Off-Lev. Height velocity improved from 3.0 (0.3-6.0) cm/year Pre-Lev to 3.7 (0.0-8.0) cm/year During-Lev and 5.4 (0.0-9.1) Off-Lev. We conclude that levamisole is an effective short- and long-term steroid-sparing agent in pediatric NS.

Spectrophotometric determination of benzydamine HCl, levamisole HCl and mebeverine HCl through ion-pair complex formation with methyl orange

A simple, rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method has been proposed for the assay of benzydamine HCl (BENZ), levamisole HCl (LEV) and mebeverine HCl (MBV) in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. The method based on the reaction of the selected drugs with methyl orange (MO) in buffered aqueous solution at pH 3.6. The formed yellow ion-pair complexes were extracted with dichloromethane and measured quantitatively with maximum absorption at 422 nm. The analytical parameters and their effects on the reported systems are investigated. The extracts are intensely colored and very stable at room temperature. The calibration graphs were linear over the concentration range of 2-10 microg ml(-1) for BENZ, 6-24 microg ml(-1) for LEV and 4-14 microg ml(-1) for MBV. The stoichiometry of the reaction was found to be 1:1 in all cases and the conditional stability constant (K(f)) of the complexes have been calculated. The proposed method was successfully extended to pharmaceutical preparations-tablets. Excipients used as additive in commercial formulations did not interfere in the analysis. The proposed method can be recommended for quality control and routine analysis where time, cost effectiveness and high specificity of analytical technique are of great importance.

Revised guidelines for management of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome

JUSTIFICATION

In 2001, the Indian Pediatric Nephrology Group formulated guidelines for management of patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. In view of emerging scientific evidence, it was felt necessary to review the existing recommendations.

PROCESS

Following a preliminary meeting in March 2007, a draft statement was prepared and circulated among pediatric nephrologists in the country to arrive at a consensus on the evaluation and management of these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To revise and formulate recommendations for management of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The need for adequate corticosteroid therapy at the initial episode is emphasized. Guidelines regarding the initial evaluation, indications for renal biopsy and referral to a pediatric nephrologist are updated. It is proposed that patients with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome should, at the first instance, be treated with longterm, alternate-day prednisolone. The indications for use of alternative immunosuppressive agents, including levamisole, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclosporin are outlined. The principles of dietary therapy, management of edema, and prevention and management of complications related to nephrotic syndrome are described. These guidelines, formulated on the basis of current best practice, are aimed to familiarize physicians regarding principles of management of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

Treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

The management of patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) refractory to treatment with long-term steroids, levamisole and cyclophosphamide is difficult. We report our experience on long-term treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and alternate-day prednisolone in 42 patients with SDNS previously treated with levamisole (n = 35) and/or cyclophosphamide (n = 37). The mean age (range) at onset of nephrotic syndrome was 37 (13-92) months and at treatment with MMF 104.7 (32-187) months. MMF was administered at a mean daily dose of 26.5 (16.6-31.3) mg/kg for 14.3 (6-45) months. The mean 6-monthly relapse rates decreased from 3.0 episodes before therapy to 0.9 episodes in the first 6 months, 0.7 in next 6 months, and 0.3 in those treated longer than 12 months (P < 0.0001). While on therapy, 32 (76.2%) patients showed 50% or more reduction in relapse rates, and nine (21.4%) had sustained remission. The cumulative dose of prednisolone declined significantly from 0.6 mg/kg per day before to 0.3 mg/kg per day while receiving MMF. Prednisolone requirement was reduced by 50% or more in 16 patients and between 40% and 50% in eight patients. Treatment continuation beyond 12 months resulted in sustained steroid sparing and reduced need for alternative treatments while maintaining low relapse rates. No patients had diarrhea, hematological abnormalities, or impaired renal function. This data confirms the efficacy and safety of treatment with MMF and tapering doses of alternate-day prednisolone in patients with SDNS and supports its use for longer than 12 months.

Unexpected efficacy of rituximab in multirelapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome in the adult: first case report and pathophysiological considerations

Nephrotic syndrome secondary to minimal change disease (MCNS) usually is considered to have a good renal prognosis, but frequency of relapses and steroid dependency are therapeutic challenges to physicians. Treatment of patients with multiple relapses remains controversial because few control studies are available. We report the case of a 23-year-old woman of Malian origin who experienced more than 30 relapses of MCNS. Long-term remission was observed only with rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody) treatment after step-by-step use of all currently available medications for MCNS were unsuccessful. Our observation is the first report of efficacy of rituximab during multirelapsing MCNS in an adult patient with a significant follow-up and no adjuvant therapy. This case suggests a role of B cells in MCNS, possibly by regulating T-cell function.

A fluorescence enhancement-based sensor using glycosylated metalloporphyrin as a recognition element for levamisole assay

A fluorescence sensor based on the supermolecular recognition by glycosylated metalloporphyrin for levamisole (LEV) assay is reported. For the preparation of a LEV-sensitive active material, 5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis[2-(2, 3, 4, 6-tetraacetyl-beta-D-glucopyranosyl)-1-O-phenyl] porphyrin and its metal complexes were synthesized and used in an optode membrane prepared by including glycosylated metalloporphyrin in chitosan matrice. The immobilized glycosylated metalloporphyrin is shown to be weakly fluorescent as a result of the inhibiting of the electron tansfer by central metal. The fluorescence enhancement of the metalloporphyrin modified optode membrane by LEV is based on the complexation with the central metal moiety of metalloporphyrin and weakening the inhibiting of the electron tansfer for metalloporphyrin. The glycosylated metalloporphyrin/chitosan optode membrane showed excellent selectivity toward LEV with respect to a number of interferents and exhibited stable response. The calibration graph obtained with the proposed sensor was linear over the range of 1.3x10(-5)-3.5x10(-7)ML(-1), with a detection limit of 3.5x10(-7)ML(-1) for LEV. The prepared sensor is applied for the determination of LEV in pharmaceutical preparations and the results agreed with the values obtained by the pharmacopoeia method.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

AIMS

To investigate the genetic polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), as well as its relationship with patient's clinical response to steroid therapy.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients with INS were recruited and divided into 2 groups according to their clinical response to steroids: steroid-sensitive (SS) with 19 patients and non-SS with 40 patients, which was further divided into steroid-dependent (SD) and steroid-resistant (SR) groups with 35 and 5 patients, respectively. Seventy-nine children without previous renal diseases and negative proteinuria were enrolled as a control group. The genotypes for ACE I/D polymorphism, including DD, ID, and II, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The distribution of ACE DD, ID, and II genotypes in INS patients were 52.5, 10.2 and 37.3%, respectively; the corresponding numbers for the control group were 2.5, 25.3 and 72.2%, respectively. Patients with INS had a significantly higher percentage of DD genotype (p <0.001) than the control group. This higher incidence of the DD genotype was observed in both the SS and non-SS groups. A higher percentage of the DD genotype in the non-SS group and in the SD group as compared to the SS group (both p < 0.05) was also noted.

CONCLUSION

Our data shows that INS is associated with a higher incidence of the DD genotype, especially in non-SS patients. This finding suggests that the DD genotype may be a risk factor for INS and play a role in the clinical response to steroids.

Initial treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children: prednisone versus prednisone plus cyclosporine A: a prospective, randomized trial

Previous studies of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome have shown that the length of initial prednisone therapy has an impact on the subsequent relapse rate. The aim of this randomized, prospective, multicenter study was to reduce the number of relapses further by increasing the initial immunosuppression: Patients with an initial attack of nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to treatment with 6 wk of 60 mg/m(2) per d prednisone followed by 6 wk of 40 mg/m(2) per 48 h (Pred group) or to the same prednisone treatment plus 8 wk of cyclosporine (Pred+CsA group). The primary end point was first relapse; follow-up was truncated at 2 yr. In the Pred+CsA group (n = 49 patients), the first relapse occurred later compared with the Pred group (n = 55 patients) (median 22.8 versus 12.5 mo). After 6 mo, 10.4% of patients in the Pred+CsA group experienced a first relapse versus 31.5% in the Pred group (P = 0.01); after 1 yr, 36.5 versus 51% (P = 0.15); and after 2 yr, 51 versus 50%. The mean relapse rate per patient was 0.12 versus 0.57 after 6 mo (P = 0.01), 0.63 versus 1.03 after 1 yr (P = 0.02), and 1.03 versus 2.06 after 2 yr (not significant). The significant benefit for adding CsA was lost after 9 to 12 mo. GFR remained unchanged. The subsequent treatment rate with cyclophosphamide was lower in the CsA group (five versus 12 patients) after 2 yr. With the use of logistic regression statistics, children who were younger than 7 yr show a significantly better sustained remission rate with initial CsA treatment for the 2-yr observation time (P = 0.03). It remains questionable, however, whether the intensified initial treatment with CsA could be recommended generally.

Experience with levamisole in frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

This was a controlled prospective study on the use of an immunomodulator drug, levamisole, in the treatment of frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent (FR/SD) idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. The study was started on 1 January 2001 and completed on 31 December 2003. There were two groups: a treatment group who received levamisole (2.5 mg/kg) on alternate days for 1 year and a control group who received low-dose prednisolone only (<0.5 mg/kg) on alternate days for 1 year. There were a total of 56 patients (32 in the treatment group and 24 in the control group). The male to female ratio was 1.66:1 in both groups. The mean age upon initial diagnosis was 3.3 years in the levamisole group versus 4.3 years in the control group. The mean duration from diagnosis to the start of the second line treatment was 3.2 years in the levamisole group versus 2.8 years in the control group. The relapse rate and the total cumulative dose of prednisolone during the year prior to second line therapy was compared to that during the year following the institution of second line therapy in 56 patients. The mean relapse rate was reduced more significantly in the levamisole group. It was reduced by 0.29 versus 0.11 relapses/patient/month in the control group (P =0.0001). The mean cumulative dose of steroids was also reduced more significantly in the levamisole group. It was reduced by 293 versus 102 mg/m(2)/month in the control group (P <0.0001). Therapy failure was seen in 3/32 (9.4%) in the levamisole group versus 12/24 (50%) in the control group. Of the patients, 20/32 (62.5%) using levamisole were relapse-free in the follow-up year post therapy, while no patient was relapse-free in the control group over the same period. No major adverse effects of levamisole were seen. The cost of levamisole therapy was estimated to be US$ 25 per year for a 20-kg body weight child. Thus, we concluded that levamisole is a highly efficacious, safe and easily affordable initial therapy for FR/SD idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.

Mycophenolate mofetil therapy in frequently relapsing steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome of childhood: current status and future directions

Clinicians are often faced with therapeutic dilemmas and challenges while treating children with frequently relapsing steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In the past, children with SDNS have been treated with long-term alternate day steroids cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine (CSA), chlorambucil, levamisole, and azathioprine. The essential aim of these therapies is to maintain remission while limiting exposure to steroids. These medications have variable efficacy and undesirable toxicity profiles. Recently, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a new therapeutic option for the management of SDNS in a few uncontrolled clinical trials. Preliminary data are encouraging. MMF was found to be useful in maintaining remission and has a steroid-sparing effect. Clearly, more data are needed to further characterize the safety and efficacy of MMF, define adequate length of treatment, and optimize drug exposure and monitoring. The management of SRNS is primarily aimed at decreasing proteinuria and inducing remission, if possible. By doing so, one would aim to preserve renal function. CSA therapy is known to be useful in this regard but has undesirable side effects, the most concerning being nephrotoxicity. MMF in combination with steroids and angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor drugs is known to have some efficacy in the management of SRNS. These preliminary data have prompted the National Institutes of Health to sponsor a multicentric controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of MMF with that of CSA in the treatment of steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). If MMF therapy is found to be efficacious, it would help obviate the need for CSA and its associated nephrotoxicity. Clearly, MMF has emerged as an important new therapeutic option for the treatment of childhood nephrotic syndrome and FSGS. Further data are required to assess those conditions most likely to respond.

Long-term results of two unconventional agents in steroid-dependent nephrotic children

Children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome are prone to serious steroid side effects. Alternative therapies, such as oral cyclophosphamide, may also have serious side effects. We conducted this novel prospective study to compare the long-term efficacies of levamisole and I.V. pulse cyclophosphamide as therapies with potentially fewer side effects. This study included 40 children with idiopathic steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (age 3-15 years; 31 boys and 9 girls). The patients were randomized into two equal groups. One group received levamisole 2.5 mg/kg on alternate days (levamisole group) while the other group received I.V. cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/month for six months (cyclophosphamide group). Prednisolone was gradually withdrawn. After stopping treatment, the number of patients that maintained remission was five (25%) in each group at six months, four (20%) versus two (10%) at one year and three (15%) versus one (5%) at two years in the levamisole and cyclophosphamide groups respectively, and one (5%) in each group at three and four years. The overall side effects were mild and both drugs were well tolerated. In view of the results, we recommend trial of levamisole before adopting other therapies with more serious side effects in such patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil in steroid/cyclosporine-dependent/resistant nephrotic syndrome

Attempts to minimize the effects of prolonged steroid use in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) and the need to overcome steroid resistance (SRNS) justifies immunosuppressant therapy. We report our experience in a cohort of patients with SD/SRNS during the administration of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in a prospective protocol initiated in January 2001. Twenty-six children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were included (21 steroid dependent and 5 steroid resistant), whose response did not change after sequential treatment with cyclophosphamide (CPM) and cyclosporine (CsA). Histopathologic patterns were: 11 minimal change disease (MCD), 1 diffuse mesangial proliferation (DMP), 13 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and membranous 1 glomerulonephritis (MGN). The median age of onset of NS was 2.8 years (range 1.2-12.5), and treatment with MMF was performed at a median age of 11.4 years (range 5-17) with an initial dose of 600 mg/m(2)/12 h, adjusted to maintain levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA) at 2.5-5 mcg/ml. The planned duration of study to assess treatment efficacy was 6 months. The mean MMF dose required was 624 (SD=136) mg/m(2)/12 h (range 415-970), which maintained mean C(0)-MPA levels of 2.9 (SD=1.17) mcg/ml (range 1.2-5.9 mcg/ml). In the five patients with SRNS, only one achieved complete remission. In the patients with SDNS, steroid sparing was achieved in 15 and 9 remained in remission on MMF monotherapy. Withdrawal of MMF resulted in immediate relapse in 47%. In our study, MMF was a useful immunosuppressant due to its fewer undesirable effects and similar efficacy to other drugs used. It appears effective for the maintenance of remission in SDNS patients, with a response similar to that of CsA.

Levamisole in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome children with frequent relapses and/or steroid dependency: comparison of daily and every-other-day usage

Steroid dependency (SD) and frequent relapses (FR) are common with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). We assessed the effectiveness of daily levamisole in 36 children with SSNS with FR and/or SD. Twenty patients (group 1) were given levamisole 2-3 mg/kg q.o.d. for 4-24 months. Sixteen (group 2) had relapses within 3 months: 5 received levamisole q.d. for 3-18 months, and 11 q.d. for 6 months and then q.o.d. for 4-18 months. Follow-up was 4-36 (mean 20.4 +/- 9.2) months. After therapy, relapses (4.82 +/- 3.15 vs. 2.01 +/- 2.5 in group 1; 5.97 +/- 3.38 vs. 1.34 +/- 2.1 in group 2; p < 0.05) and prednisolone doses (0.57 +/- 0.37 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.33 mg/kg/day in group 1; 0.61 +/- 0.42 vs. 0.19 +/- 0.35 mg/kg/day in group 2; p < 0.05) decreased. Relapse frequency, prednisolone dose, response percentage, and survival curves for remission did not differ between groups. Group 1 had five episodes of leukopenia, and group 2 had four. White blood cell counts normalized after levamisole was discontinued. Serum blood urea nitrogen/creatinine and alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels were normal. Levamisole is effective in maintaining remission in children with SSNS and FR and/or SD. Daily levamisole can be considered when responses to q.o.d. usage are unsatisfactory.

Levamisole in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome of childhood: the lost paradise?

Among the different drugs used for sparing steroids in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) with frequent relapses and steroid dependency, levamisole is the least toxic and the least expensive. However, it is neither approved for this indication nor widely used in Europe. This may be explained by the difficulty in obtaining levamisole in some countries and the lack of good quality evidence for its effectiveness. Evidence is limited to three clinical trials that all suffered from methodological limitations. Statistical synthesis of these trials showed that levamisole reduces the risk of a relapse during treatment (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.79). From the available information, no conclusions can be drawn on the steroid-sparing effect, the long-term efficacy, and safety, as well as possible differences in efficacy in different subgroups of SSNS patients. The confirmation of a favorable effect of levamisole on the reduction of the frequency of relapses and on sparing steroids in an adequately powered, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-center clinical trial will promote consensus on the place of levamisole in the treatment of SSNS of childhood. Follow-up should be at least 1 year to evaluate long-term efficacy and side effects. If the results of such a clinical trial confirm the beneficial effects of levamisole in nephrotic syndrome, this may allow registration for this indication and interest companies other than Jansen-Cilag, which only recently has decided to stop its production.

Long-term effects of levamisole treatment in childhood nephrotic syndrome

The effects of levamisole treatment on long-term outcome were evaluated in a retrospective study of frequently-relapsing (FRNS, n=15), steroid-dependent (SDNS, n=13), and steroid-resistant (SRNS, n=6) nephrotic syndrome in 34 children (21 boys, 13 girls, mean age 5.0+/-3.4 years) during a 60-month follow-up period. The definition of frequent relapses was > or = 4 relapses per year. The current relapse was treated with prednisolone 60 mg/m2 per day for 4 weeks, then with 40 mg/m2 every other day for 4 weeks, after which the dose was tapered by 10 mg weekly. From the beginning of the 5th week, levamisole was introduced at a dose of 2 mg/kg per day. The duration of levamisole treatment was 17+/-7 months. Before starting levamisole treatment the mean level of proteinuria was 2.17+/-1.34 g/day and the relapse rate was 4.41/year. By the end of levamisole therapy, proteinuria had fallen to 0.142+/-0.211 g/day and the relapse rate to 0.41/year. No relapse occurred in 23 of the 34 patients during levamisole treatment. In the 24-month follow-up period after the discontinuation of levamisole, 28 children remained in total remission, while 6 had relapses. The cumulative steroid dose before levamisole therapy was 7,564.4+/-3,497.1 mg/year and following the introduction of levamisole 1,472.9+/-1,729.9 mg/year (P<0.0001). We observed reversible neutropenia in 5 patients, but no other side effects were seen. Our findings suggest that in FRNS and SDNS levamisole significantly reduces both the relapse rate and the cumulative steroid dose; therefore, it could be recommended for these patients. In SRNS patients it has also some benefit because proteinuria and the cumulative steroid dose could be reduced significantly.

Mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone therapy in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

A proportion of patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) experience frequent relapses despite long-term treatment with steroids, levamisole, or/and cyclophosphamide. We prospectively examined the efficacy of long-term therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as a steroid-sparing agent in this group.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with a mean age of 99.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.3 to 113) who had previously undergone long-term therapy with prednisolone (n = 19), levamisole (n = 16), and cyclophosphamide (n = 15), but had continued to show steroid dependence over many years, were studied. Renal biopsy showed minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 10 and 3 patients, respectively. Patients were administered MMF at a mean dose of 29 mg/kg/d (95% CI, 27.4 to 30.7) in 2 divided doses and decreasing doses of alternate-day prednisolone for a mean of 11.8 months (95% CI, 11.4 to 12.2). Relapses were treated with daily prednisolone until remission, with tapering later. They were additionally followed up for a mean of 17 months (95% CI, 15.9 to 18.1).

RESULTS

Mean relapse rates decreased from 6.6 (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.7) to 2 episodes/y (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.7) during MMF treatment (P < 0.0001). Four patients each had 0, 1, 2, and 3 relapses; failure of MMF therapy (>3 relapses during treatment) was seen in 3 patients. Treatment with MMF resulted in steroid sparing, with a reduction in mean prednisolone dose from 0.7 (95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8) to 0.3 mg/kg/d (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.4; P < 0.0001). Fourteen patients showed a 50% or greater reduction in relapse rates; prednisolone therapy could be discontinued for 6 or more months in 8 patients. No significant gastrointestinal or hematologic side effects of MMF treatment were noted. After discontinuation of MMF treatment, 68.4% of patients had an increased frequency of relapses and recurrence of steroid dependence, requiring treatment with other medications.

CONCLUSION

Long-term therapy with MMF results in significant steroid sparing and reduction in relapse rates in patients with SDNS. Therapy with MMF and tapering doses of prednisolone appears to be a promising intervention in children with SDNS.

The management of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children

Childhood nephrotic syndrome is a rare condition with an incidence of 1-2 per 100000 children aged below 16 years. Untreated idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is associated with increased risks of life-threatening infection, thromboembolism, lipid abnormalities, and malnutrition. The aim of the management of INS in children is to induce and maintain complete remission with resolution of proteinuria and edema without serious adverse effects of therapy. The majority of children have corticosteroid sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (CSINS), and in these children, corticosteroid therapy is the mainstay of therapy to induce remission. Data from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that prolonged courses of corticosteroids (up to 7 months) given in the first episode of CSINS reduce the risk of relapse. Nevertheless, many children relapse, and are at risk of corticosteroid toxicity if frequent courses of corticosteroids are required. Data from RCTs supports the use of alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil), cyclosporine, and levamisole in these children to achieve prolonged periods of remission. The specific management of corticosteroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (CRINS) is more difficult since few therapies are consistently effective, and data from RCTs are limited. In such children, cyclosporine, alkylating agents, and high dose intravenous methylprednisone may be used. In addition to specific therapies for INS, supportive therapies are commonly used to control edema (loop diuretics, aldosterone antagonists, albumin infusions, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), reduce the risk of infection (antibacterials, pneumococcal vaccination) and thromboembolism (aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid]), and to control hyperlipidemia (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors), especially in children with CRINS.

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Nephrotic syndrome in children is a common recurrent disease. Most of the cases are due to minimal change disease with a favourable outcome. More than 90% of children with minimal change disease respond to corticosteroid therapy (steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome). 40-60% experience frequent relapses or have steroid dependence. These children require frequent corticosteroid therapy and/or immunomodulators or treatment with immunosuppressants, and are at high risk of cumulative steroid toxicity and side effects of cytotoxic therapy. Children with frequent relapses or steroid dependence should be managed in consultation with a pediatric nephrologist. Despite relapsing course, progression of minimal change nephrotic syndrome to end stage renal disease is extremely rare.

Evaluation and management of proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome in children: recommendations from a pediatric nephrology panel established at the National Kidney Foundation conference on proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, and elimination (PARADE)

OBJECTIVE

The development of this review article evolved from a National Kidney Foundation consensus conference on recent advances in the importance of evaluating and treating proteinuria. From this conference, a series of recommendations for the evaluation of adults with proteinuria was published. Because specific pediatric aspects of the problem were outside the scope of the original National Kidney Foundation publication, an ad hoc committee of 6 pediatric nephrologists who were active participants in the National Kidney Foundation conference was established to provide primary care physicians with a concise, up-to-date reference on this subject.

METHODS

The recommendations that are given represent the consensus opinions of the authors. These are based on data from controlled studies in children when available, but many of the opinions are, by necessity, based on uncontrolled series in children or controlled trials performed in adults, because controlled trials in children have not been performed to evaluate many of the treatments described.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are intended to provide primary care physicians with a useful reference when they are faced with a young child or teenager who presents with proteinuria, whether this is mild and asymptomatic or more severe, leading to nephrotic syndrome.

Management of minimal lesion glomerulonephritis: evidence-based recommendations

The treatment of idiopathic minimal lesion disease in children has been extensively studied in randomized controlled trials, however, there is less information available for adults. This article summarizes evidence-based recommendations for management. The first attack should be treated with prednisone or prednisolone at 60 mg/m2 per day (up to a maximum of 80 mg/day) for four to six weeks, followed by 40 mg/m2 of prednisone every other day for another four to six weeks (grade A). Relapse should be treated with 60 mg/m2/day of prednisone (up to 80 mg/day) only until the urine becomes protein free for three days, and then an alternate day regimen of 40 mg/m2 should be used for another month (grade A). Patients with frequently relapsing disease will have a significant reduction in relapse frequency after eight weeks of an alkylating agent (grade A). Less rigorous studies have suggested benefit with long-term, alternate-day corticosteroid (grade D) or the antihelminthic agent levamisole (grade D). For patients with steroid-dependent disease, an 8- or 12-week course with cyclophosphamide can induce remission (grade D). In true steroid-resistant disease, observational studies have suggested that a course of cyclosporine may sometimes induce remission or restore steroid responsiveness (grade D). Large retrospective studies in adults suggest that therapeutic response is slower than in children, but adults experience fewer relapses and more prolonged remission.