Treatment of focal glomerulosclerosis with pulse steroids and oral cyclophosphamide

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rationale & Objective

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare condition that can lead to kidney function decline and chronic kidney failure. Immunosuppressants are used to treat primary FSGS. However, their efficacy and safety in FSGS are not clearly established. We assessed current knowledge on clinical effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for primary FSGS.

Study Design

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, and registries.

Setting & Participants

Patients with primary and genetic FSGS.

Selection Criteria for Studies

Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English-language, primary-FSGS studies from inception to 2019. Clinical outcomes were changes from baseline in proteinuria, kidney function, and kidney survival.

Data Extraction

2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data.

Analytical Approach

Study results were summarized using random-effects models either as ratios of means between follow-up and baseline measurements or as HRs.

Results

We included 98 articles. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient baseline characteristics and study designs. Most studies assessed treatment with corticosteroids alone or combined with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. Patients treated with immunosuppressants showed reduced proteinuria (14 studies; ratio of means, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47), decreased creatinine clearance (mean difference, −25.03; 95% CI, −59.33 to −9.27) and (significantly) lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (mean difference, −7.61 mL/min/1.73 m²; 95% CI, −14.98 to 0.25 mL/min/1.73 m²). Immunosuppressant therapy had an uncertain effect on reducing the chronic kidney failure risk. Hypertension and infections were the most commonly reported adverse events.

Limitations

Heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens; no access to individual patient–level data.

Conclusions

This systematic review supports proteinuria reduction with immunosuppressant therapy in primary FSGS over varying follow-up periods. The effects of immunosuppressants on kidney survival remain uncertain. This review underscores the need for better-designed and adequately controlled studies to assess immunosuppressant therapy in patients with primary FSGS.

Risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Nephrotic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the risk factors of VTE in nephrotic syndrome, other than hypoalbuminemia and severe proteinuria, are not well established. Therefore we aimed to investigate the risk factors of VTE in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from a Japanese nationwide claims database. We identified patients ≥18 years of age hospitalized with nephrotic syndrome. Through multivariable logistic regression, we determined the risk factors of VTE in patients with nephrotic syndrome during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of the 7473 hospitalized patients with nephrotic syndrome without VTE, 221 (3.0%) developed VTE. In the VTE group, 14 (6.3%), 11 (5.0%) and 198 (89.6%) patients developed pulmonary embolism, renal vein thrombosis and deep vein thrombosis, respectively. We found that female sex {odds ratio [OR] 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.85]}, body mass index (BMI) ≥30 [OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.35-2.99)], acute kidney injury [AKI; OR 1.67 (95% CI 1.07-2.62)], sepsis [OR 2.85 (95% CI 1.37-5.93)], lupus nephritis [OR 3.64 (95% CI 1.58-8.37)] and intravenous corticosteroids use [OR 2.40 (95% CI 1.52-3.80)] were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with nephrotic syndrome, female sex, BMI ≥30, AKI, sepsis, lupus nephritis and intravenous corticosteroid use may help evaluate the risk of VTE.

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a leading cause of kidney disease worldwide. The presumed etiology of primary FSGS is a plasma factor with responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapy and a risk of recurrence after kidney transplant-important disease characteristics. In contrast, adaptive FSGS is associated with excessive nephron workload due to increased body size, reduced nephron capacity, or single glomerular hyperfiltration associated with certain diseases. Additional etiologies are now recognized as drivers of FSGS: high-penetrance genetic FSGS due to mutations in one of nearly 40 genes, virus-associated FSGS, and medication-associated FSGS. Emerging data support the identification of a sixth category: APOL1 risk allele-associated FSGS in individuals with sub-Saharan ancestry. The classification of a particular patient with FSGS relies on integration of findings from clinical history, laboratory testing, kidney biopsy, and in some patients, genetic testing. The kidney biopsy can be helpful, with clues provided by features on light microscopy (e.g, glomerular size, histologic variant of FSGS, microcystic tubular changes, and tubular hypertrophy), immunofluorescence (e.g, to rule out other primary glomerulopathies), and electron microscopy (e.g., extent of podocyte foot process effacement, podocyte microvillous transformation, and tubuloreticular inclusions). A complete assessment of renal histology is important for establishing the parenchymal setting of segmental glomerulosclerosis, distinguishing FSGS associated with one of many other glomerular diseases from the clinical-pathologic syndrome of FSGS. Genetic testing is beneficial in particular clinical settings. Identifying the etiology of FSGS guides selection of therapy and provides prognostic insight. Much progress has been made in our understanding of FSGS, but important outstanding issues remain, including the identity of the plasma factor believed to be responsible for primary FSGS, the value of routine implementation of genetic testing, and the identification of more effective and less toxic therapeutic interventions for FSGS.

A Novel Biomarker Panel to Identify Steroid Resistance in Childhood Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) is the most common glomerular disorder of childhood. Response to initial treatment with corticosteroids is an indicator of prognosis, as resistant patients often present more progressive disease. In this cross-sectional pilot study, we set out to discover a panel of noninvasive biomarkers that could distinguish steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) from steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). Information gleaned from such a panel could yield more individualized treatment plans and prevent unnecessary steroid exposure in patients unlikely to respond. Urine was collected from 50 pediatric patients diagnosed with idiopathic NS at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) was used to discover 13 proteins that were differentially expressed in SSNS vs SRNS in a small 5 × 5 discovery cohort. Suitable assays were found for 9 of the 13 markers identified by iTRAQ and were used in a 25 SRNS × 25 SSNS validation cohort. Vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), alpha-1 acid glycoprotein 1 (AGP1), alpha-1 acid glycoprotein 2 (AGP2), alpha-1-B glycoprotein (A1BG), fetuin-A, prealbumin, thyroxine-binding globulin and hemopexin, and alpha-2 macroglobulin were measured and combined with urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), which had been previously shown to distinguish patients with SRNS. Urinary VDBP, prealbumin, NGAL, fetuin-A, and AGP2 were found to be significantly elevated in SRNS using univariate analysis, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.65 to 0.81. Multivariate analysis revealed a panel of all 10 markers that yielded an AUC of 0.92 for identification of SRNS. A subset of 5 markers (including VDBP, NGAL, fetuin-A, prealbumin, and AGP2) showed significant associations with SRNS and yielded an AUC of 0.85.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond may be treated with immunosuppressive agents including calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and with non-immunosuppressive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). Optimal combinations of these agents with the least toxicity remain to be determined. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and updated in 2006 and 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions used in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, who do not achieve remission following four weeks or more of daily corticosteroid therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register (up to 2 March 2016) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with SRNS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently searched the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were pooled using the random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs (820 children enrolled; 773 evaluated) were included. Most studies were small. Eleven studies were at low risk of bias for allocation concealment and only four studies were at low risk of performance bias. Fifteen, eight and 10 studies were at low risk of detection bias, attrition bias and reporting bias respectively. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission. However this was based on only eight children who achieved remission with cyclosporin compared with no children who achieved remission with placebo/no treatment in three small studies (49 children: RR 7.66, 95% CI 1.06 to 55.34). Calcineurin inhibitors significantly increased the number with complete or partial remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide (2 studies, 156 children: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.13; I² = 20%). There was no significant differences in the number who achieved complete remission between tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (1 study, 41 children: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.66), cyclosporin versus mycophenolate mofetil plus dexamethasone (1 study, 138 children: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24), oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone versus prednisone alone (2 studies, 91 children: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87), IV versus oral cyclophosphamide (1 study, 11 children: RR 3.13, 95% CI 0.81 to 12.06), IV cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide plus IV dexamethasone (1 study, 49 children: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.96), and azathioprine with prednisone versus prednisone alone (1 study, 31 children: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.15 to 5.84). One study found no significant differences between three agents (cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide) used in combination with tacrolimus and prednisone. One study found no significant difference in the percentage reduction in proteinuria (31 children: -12; 95% CI -73 to 110) between rituximab with cyclosporin/prednisolone and cyclosporin/prednisolone alone. Two studies reported ACEi significantly reduced proteinuria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date RCTs have demonstrated that calcineurin inhibitors increase the likelihood of complete or partial remission compared with placebo/no treatment or cyclophosphamide. For other regimens assessed, it remains uncertain whether the interventions alter outcomes because the certainty of the evidence is low. Further adequately powered, well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate other regimens for children with idiopathic SRNS. Since SRNS represents a spectrum of diseases, future studies should enrol children from better defined groups of patients with SRNS.

Long-term outcome of idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

Several recent studies have shown improved short-term outcome of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children; however, only a few studies have evaluated the long-term outcome. The aims of our study were to obtain detailed data and analyze the long-term outcome of children with SRNS.

METHODS

Sixty-nine children with idiopathic SRNS were enrolled and divided into two groups based on initial histopathological patterns: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and minimal change (MC)/diffuse mesangial proliferation (DMP). The effects of initial treatment with the immunosuppressant of choice (cyclosporine or cyclophosphamide) on renal survival, remission, and incidence of complications were analyzed in both groups (4 subgroups).

RESULTS

The renal survival rate was significantly different among the four different subgroups based on different combinations of initial histopathological pattern (FSGS vs. MC/DMP) and initial immunosuppressant used for treating SRNS (cyclosporine vs. cyclophosphamide) (P = 0.013), with renal survival in the FSGS (cyclophosphamide) subgroup being especially low (54.6 %). Disease- and/or treatment-associated complications were relatively low; however, hypertension at last examination was observed in a considerable number of patients (31.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a recently developed therapeutic regimen with cyclosporine considerably improves both the initial remission rate and the long-term renal survival rate of children with idiopathic SRNS.

Urinary Vitamin D-Binding Protein as a Biomarker of Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) is one of the most common glomerular disorders of childhood and is associated with increased urinary vitamin D-binding protein (uVDBP) excretion. We tested the hypothesis that uVDBP represents a biomarker to differentiate steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) from the more benign forms of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included children with SRNS (n = 24), SSNS (n = 28), and normal controls (n = 5). Urine and clinical data were collected from patients. Measurements of uVDBP were performed with a commercially available ELISA kit and normalized to urine creatinine.

RESULTS

Concentrations of uVDBP were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in patients with SRNS (13,659 ng/mL, interquartile range [IQR] 477–22,979) than in patients with SSNS (94 ng/mL, IQR 53–202) and normal controls (23 ng/mL, IQR 22–99, P = 0.002). Significance did not change when the results were corrected for urine creatinine. uVDBP was significantly negatively correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; R = −0.76, P = 0.03). However, uVDBP was still markedly elevated in patients with SRNS with eGFR >100 mL/minute/1.73 m². There was a positive correlation between microalbuminuria (MALB/Cr) and uVDBP (R = 0.67, P < 0.001). However, uVDBP displayed a much higher discriminatory ability for distinguishing SRNS than MALB/Cr (area under the curve = 0.92 vs 0.67, respectively). An uVDBP cutoff of 362 ng/mL yielded the optimal sensitivity (80%) and specificity (83%) to distinguish SRNS from SSNS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, uVDBP represents a noninvasive biomarker that could distinguish SRNS from the more benign SSNS with high discriminatory power.

Second-line options for refractory steroid-sensitive and -resistant nephrotic syndrome

Although initially, many children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond to steroid therapy, a repeated course for patients with relapses often causes significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses or steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment, and so far, cyclophosphamide or levamisole have been regarded as first-choice options, although the latter is no longer available in many countries. Data are accumulating that mycophenolic acid may be an alternative for these patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus) are usually effective and are often used after cytotoxic treatment, but long-term treatment is necessary, raising concerns regarding the accumulation of side effects. Still, some patients show a tendency to relapse even on this maintenance regimen and some even have a refractory course that creates a medical dilemma. For this situation, recent data have demonstrated an effect of monoclonal antibodies directed to B cells - rituximab, a drug that may also prove to be a therapeutic option in less complicated cases. Patients that do not respond to initial steroid treatment need genetic testing and a renal biopsy, since focal segmental glomerulosclerosis may be present. Treatment options include pulse methylprednisolone, often in addition to calcineurin inhibitors (mainly cyclosporine but also, recently, tacrolimus). Cyctotoxic treatment, especially intravenous cyclophosphamide, has been found to be effective in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome by some studies but is inferior to calcineurin inhibitors. In addition, mycophenolic acid and rituximab have been used in children with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; however, response seems to be inferior in comparison with patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Taken together, idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, including steroid-sensitive as well as steroid-resistant patients, is a potentially serious disorder. Although much progress has been made in recent years and a wide arsenal of immunological interventions is available, some patients have a treatment refractory course. Prospective studies or at least standardization of treatment for complicated cases is urgently needed.

NGAL distinguishes steroid sensitivity in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) is the most common glomerular disorder of childhood. Invasive biopsy remains the diagnostic method of choice for NS. Prognosis correlates with steroid responsiveness, from sensitive (SSNS) to resistant (SRNS). Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been demonstrated to be a powerful risk marker of chronic kidney disease progression. We set out to determine if urine NGAL can distinguish between patients with SRNS, SSNS, and healthy controls.

METHODS

Urine and clinical data were collected from patients at Cincinnati Children's Hospital who were recently diagnosed with active nephrotic syndrome as well as healthy controls. Participants included SRNS (n = 15), SSNS (n = 14), and healthy controls (n = 10). Urinary NGAL was measured by ELISA and normalized to creatinine.

RESULTS

Median NGAL was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in SRNS (172.3 ng/ml, IQR 18.8-789) than both SSNS (6.3 ng/ml, IQR 4.9-9.9) and healthy controls (6.5 ng/ml, IQR 4.2-9.1). The area under the curve (AUC) for NGAL to distinguish SRNS from SSNS was 0.91 (p < 0.0001). NGAL levels demonstrated a significant negative correlation with glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.5, p < 0.001). Results did not change with NGAL corrected for urine creatinine and were independent of the degree of proteinuria.

CONCLUSIONS

NGAL levels differentiate SSNS from SRNS and correlate with disease severity in SRNS.

Discovery and initial validation of α 1-B glycoprotein fragmentation as a differential urinary biomarker in pediatric steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

PURPOSE

In this cross-sectional pilot study we set out to discover a non-invasive biomarker that could distinguish steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) from steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Urine and clinical data were collected from patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and healthy controls. Using SELDI-TOF-MS, we identified an 11-fold upregulated 13.8 kDa fragment of α 1-B glycoprotein (A1BG) in urine in SRNS. To validate our findings, A1BG was detected by Western blot. Creatinine was measured and transformed to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the new Schwartz formula and classified to chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage. p-Values were determined by unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Microalbumin was also measured to determine albumin/creatinine ratios.

RESULTS

The 13.8 kDa A1BG was present in 7 of 19 patients with SRNS; but absent in all SSNS (n=15) and controls (n=10). The A1BG(+) patients had lower GFR than A1BG(-) patients (p<0.009) and tended to have higher CKD stage.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The 13.8 kDa A1BG fragment had a high discriminatory power for steroid resistance in pediatric nephrotic syndrome, but is only present in a subset of patients. Additional longitudinal studies are required to determine the usefulness of this biomarker as a non-invasive predictive marker of therapeutic response.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond may be treated with immunosuppressive agents including calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and with non-immunosuppressive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). Optimal combinations of these agents with the least toxicity remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions used to treat idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with SRNS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently searched the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed quality and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were pooled using the random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs (449 children) were included. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission (three studies, 49 children: RR 7.66, 95% CI 1.06 to 55.34). Cyclosporin significantly increased the number with complete or partial remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide (one study, 32 children: RR 3.40, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.28). There was no significant difference in the number who achieved complete remission between oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone versus prednisone alone (two studies, 91 children: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87), IV versus oral cyclophosphamide (one study, 11 children: RR 3.13, 95% CI 0.81 to 12.06), IV cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide with IV dexamethasone (one study, 49 children: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.96), tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (one study, 41 children: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.66) and azathioprine with prednisone versus prednisone alone (one study, 31 children: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.15 to 5.84). ACEi significantly reduced proteinuria (two studies, 70 children). No studies were identified comparing high dose steroids and cyclosporin with single agents, placebo or no treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Further adequately powered, well designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of cyclosporin and to evaluate other regimens for idiopathic SRNS including high dose steroids with cyclosporin.

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism on steroid resistance in Egyptian children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Introduction. The presence of the deletion (D) allele in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been reported as a probable genetic risk factor for idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), but its role in determining resistance to steroid therapy remains to be evaluated.

Methods. Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study and received oral steroids. The pattern of response to steroid therapy was determined. A group of 50 healthy adults served as a control group. The genotypes for ACE insertion (I)/D polymorphism were analysed using a PCR-based method.

Results. Twenty patients were steroid sensitive (SS) and 31 were non-SS. The presence of hypertension at presentation was significantly related to steroid unresponsiveness. Among the SS group, the frequencies of the II, ID, and DD genotypes of the ACE gene were 20% (n=4), 65% (n=13), and 15% (n=3), respectively, while the frequencies among the non-SS group were 19.4% (n=6), 74.2% (n=23), and 6.5% (n=2), respectively. The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (Chi square=0.59).

Conclusion. The current study on Egyptian children with INS reveals no association between the ACE gene I/D polymorphism and clinical parameters, histological findings, and steroid resistance.

Therapies for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Between 10 and 20% of children with primary nephrotic syndrome are steroid-resistant (SRNS). From earlier studies in children with SRNS, we know that cyclosporin (with or without alternate-day prednisone) and cyclophosphamide (with pulse intravenous corticosteroids) result in comparable complete or partial remission rates of about 60%. An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin has not been possible because of the absence of a head-to-head randomised trial. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie trial, published in this issue of Pediatric Nephrology, has filled this gap in our evidence base. Although there was no difference in the number of patients achieving complete remission, those patients receiving cyclosporin treatment were significantly more likely to achieve partial remission than those receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide. This result suggests that cyclosporin rather than cyclophosphamide should be used as first line therapy for children with SRNS.

Efficacy of intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide treatment versus combination of intravenous dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

We compared, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of a regimen based on intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide therapy with a combination of i.v. dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide therapy in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). During April 2001 to December 2003, 52 consecutive patients with idiopathic SRNS, normal renal function and renal histology findings showing minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis were enrolled into the study. Patients in group I received i.v. injection of cyclophosphamide once a month for 6 months and prednisolone on alternate days. Those in group II received i.v. treatment with dexamethasone (initially on alternate days, later fortnightly and monthly; total 14 doses), oral cyclophosphamide therapy (for 3 months) and prednisolone on alternate days. Data from 49 patients (26 in group I, 23 in group II) were analyzed; their clinical and biochemical features were similar at inclusion. Following treatment, complete remission was seen in 53.8% and 47.8% patients in groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.6). Long-term follow up showed favorable outcome in 14 (53.8%) patients in group I, and 9 (39.1%) in group II. Chief adverse effects, including cushingoid features and serious infections, were similar in both groups. Patients receiving i.v. dexamethasone therapy commonly showed hypertension and hypokalemia, while vomiting and reversible alopecia occurred in those receiving i.v. treatment with cyclophosphamide. In patients with SRNS, the efficacy of treatment intravenously with cyclophosphamide and orally with prednisolone was similar to the combination of dexamethasone intravenously, orally administered cyclophosphamide and prednisolone.

Corticosteroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis : an update of treatment options for children

Corticosteroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (CRNS) with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a heterogeneous disorder and the most severe and frequent type of all glomerulopathies in children leading to end-stage renal failure. The podocyte is at the center of development and progress of FSGS; this unique cell type plays a major role in the integrity of glomerular structure and permeability. The rate of complete remission of CRNS after induction therapy using different immunosuppressant agents is reported to range between 30% and 84%, depending on the treatment schedule and on the underlying defects of FSGS. Children with genetic types of FSGS barely respond to immunosuppressant therapies and over-treatment prior to transplantation should be avoided. The response of children with an idiopathic type of FSGS to immunosuppressants is superior to those with genetic FSGS. However, many children with idiopathic FSGS do not enter complete remission if they are under-treated, for example, with short-term immunosuppressant monotherapies. If immunosuppressant treatment fails, these patients will have to undergo renal transplantation. However, as unknown pathogenetic mechanisms may persist, more than one-third of these patients with idiopathic FSGS develop a rapid recurrence of CRNS that responds poorly to further long-term therapeutic attempts. In contrast with previously published data, this review takes into account recently identified genetic etiologies of CRNS, and superior results with long-term combination therapy in idiopathic forms to avoid over- and under-treatment.

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: long-term evolution after sequential therapy

We present a retrospective study of 30 children of mean age 3.02 +/- 1.81 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) treated with intravenous injection of methylprednisolone plus orally administered prednisone; 24 children also received cyclophosphamide (CP). Sixteen were resistant to steroids from the beginning, and 14 after a mean of 11.26 +/- 16.61 months. The initial histological diagnosis was: 18 minimal change disease (MCD), 11 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and one diffuse mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (DMPG). Total remission was achieved in 22 patients (73.3%), partial response in three (10%) and no response in five (16.6%), two of whom were brothers carrying an NPHS2 gene double mutation. There was no difference in response between the MCD and FSGS patients; the only patient with DMPG did not respond. Only initial resistance was a sign of bad prognosis. At follow-up (6.4 +/- 3.6 years from last pulse), 21/22 were still in remission, 14/21 were without treatment. Six patients required cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil because of steroid dependence. Two non-responders developed end-stage renal failure (ESRF); the remaining patients maintained normal glomerular filtration. The treatment was well tolerated. In conclusion, most of the patients treated with sequential therapy consisting of methylprednisolone (MP) (100%) and CP (80%) showed remission and preserved renal function, but 20% developed steroid dependence.

Low-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy in Chinese children with steroid resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a primary glomerular disease that usually progresses to renal failure. Although high-dose pulse methylprednisolone therapy (PMT) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of steroid-resistant FSGS, adverse effects have caused parents to hesitate in approving the treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate whether low-dose PMT based protocol for treatment of young children with steroid resistant FSGS would effectively induce remission of proteinuria and prevent the progression of renal insufficiency.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. The authors treated eight children with steroid-resistant FSGS with intravenous methylprednisolone pulse 10 mg/kg per day for three consecutive days weekly for 8 weeks. Partial responders were treated with the addition of chlorambucil or cyclosporine (CsA) and four fortnightly and eight monthly pulses of high-dose PMT (30 mg/kg per day).

RESULTS

Of the eight patients, six attained complete remission initially. The median urinary protein excretion in 24 h decreased from 4.25 to 0.39 g following 8 weeks of low dose (P = 0.012). Marked decrease in urinary protein-creatinine ratio was noted soon after treatment (P = 0.012). There was a significant increase in serum albumin level after treatment compared to the pretreatment condition (median, 3.35 vs 4.1 mg/dL, P = 0.018). Five of the eight patients remained in complete remission, and one of the eight patients relapsed during follow up. Relapse responded to repeated treatments of PMT and cyclosporine. The two patients with partial remission initially progressed to renal insufficiency in one patient and end-stage renal disease in the other patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose PMT caused a significant decrease in the proteinuria of Chinese children with steroid-resistant FSGS with a low frequency of intolerance.

Primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis in children: clinical course and prognosis

To review the clinical course and identify prognostic factors, we retrospectively analyzed 92 children with steroid-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). The mean age of onset was 80.4+/-42.4 months. The mean follow-up duration was 98.2+/-63.3 months. Eighty-five patients presented with nephrotic syndrome and seven presented with asymptomatic proteinuria. Thirty-three patients were initial responders to steroid treatment (late non-responders) and 59 were initial nonresponders. At last follow-up, 36 patients (39.1%) were in complete remission, and 29 (31.5%) progressed to chronic renal failure (CRF). Renal survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 84, 64, and 53%, respectively. By morphological classification, there were tip variants (6.1%), collapsing variants (10.6%), cellular variants (1.5%), perihilar variants (9.1%), and NOS (not otherwise specified, 72.7%). Among the variants, there were no significant differences in age of onset, degree of proteinuria, response to treatment, or progression to CRF. Poor prognostic factors for CRF included: asymptomatic proteinuria at presentation, initial renal insufficiency, higher segmental sclerosis (%), severe tubulointerstitial change, initial nonresponse, and absence of remission. In the multivariate analysis, an increase in the initial serum creatinine and resistance to treatment were independent risk factors for CRF. A more prolonged use of corticosteroid therapy and early introduction of cyclosporin A (CsA) may improve the prognosis for primary FSGS in patients with initial steroid nonresponsiveness.

Management of steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children using tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

The use of tacrolimus in steroid-resistant (SR) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has been reported in single and small series case reports.

AIM

To determine the efficacy of tacrolimus in the management of SR FSGS in children.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective study of 20 children with SR FSGS treated with tacrolimus (0.2-0.4 mg/kg/day in two divided doses over 12 h adjusted to a trough level between 7 and 15 ng/ml) for 12 months in combination with low-dose steroids. Other therapies included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, folic acid, multivitamins and lipid-lowering agents.

RESULTS

The mean age at study entry was 11.1 years (range 5.6-16.8). The mean duration of nephrotic syndrome before initiation of tacrolimus therapy was 4.7 years (range 2.1-7.6). At the end of the treatment period, 8 (40%) children were in complete remission, 9 (45%) were in partial remission, and 3 (15%) failed to respond. The average follow-up period following cessation of tacrolimus treatment was 27.5 months (range 13.7-43.7). At last hospital follow-up, 5 (25%) children were in complete remission, 10 (50%) in partial remission, and 2 (10%) in relapse. Three children died from dialysis-related complications following cessation of tacrolimus treatment. Adverse events included sepsis (2), nausea (2), diarrhea (2), anemia (4) and worsening of hypertension (4).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment for SR FSGS. However, like cyclosporine, some children tend to relapse following cessation of treatment.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome, achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond may be treated with immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil or cyclosporin, or with non-immunosuppressive agents such as ACE inhibitors. Optimal combinations of these agents with the least toxicity remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions used to treat idiopathic steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings. Date of most recent search: June 2005

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with SRNS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently searched the literature, determined trial eligibility, assessed quality, extracted data and entered it in RevMan. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were pooled using the random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven RCTs (312 children) were included. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission (three trials, 49 children: RR for persistent nephrotic syndrome 0.64, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the number of children who achieved complete remission between oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone and prednisone alone (two trials, 91 children: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.36), between intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral cyclophosphamide (one study, 11 children: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.39) and between azathioprine with prednisone and prednisone alone (one trial 31 children: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.32). ACE inhibitors significantly reduced proteinuria (two trials, 70 children). After 12 weeks of treatment fosinopril reduced proteinuria by 0.95 g/24 h (95% CI -1.21 to -0.69). No RCTs were identified comparing combination regimens comprising high dose steroids, alkylating agents or cyclosporin with single agents, placebo or no treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Further adequately powered and well designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of cyclosporin and to evaluate other regimens for idiopathic SRNS including high dose steroids with alkylating agents or cyclosporin.

Mycophenolate mofetil therapy in frequently relapsing steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome of childhood: current status and future directions

Clinicians are often faced with therapeutic dilemmas and challenges while treating children with frequently relapsing steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In the past, children with SDNS have been treated with long-term alternate day steroids cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine (CSA), chlorambucil, levamisole, and azathioprine. The essential aim of these therapies is to maintain remission while limiting exposure to steroids. These medications have variable efficacy and undesirable toxicity profiles. Recently, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a new therapeutic option for the management of SDNS in a few uncontrolled clinical trials. Preliminary data are encouraging. MMF was found to be useful in maintaining remission and has a steroid-sparing effect. Clearly, more data are needed to further characterize the safety and efficacy of MMF, define adequate length of treatment, and optimize drug exposure and monitoring. The management of SRNS is primarily aimed at decreasing proteinuria and inducing remission, if possible. By doing so, one would aim to preserve renal function. CSA therapy is known to be useful in this regard but has undesirable side effects, the most concerning being nephrotoxicity. MMF in combination with steroids and angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor drugs is known to have some efficacy in the management of SRNS. These preliminary data have prompted the National Institutes of Health to sponsor a multicentric controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of MMF with that of CSA in the treatment of steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). If MMF therapy is found to be efficacious, it would help obviate the need for CSA and its associated nephrotoxicity. Clearly, MMF has emerged as an important new therapeutic option for the treatment of childhood nephrotic syndrome and FSGS. Further data are required to assess those conditions most likely to respond.

Mycophenolate mofetil in steroid/cyclosporine-dependent/resistant nephrotic syndrome

Attempts to minimize the effects of prolonged steroid use in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) and the need to overcome steroid resistance (SRNS) justifies immunosuppressant therapy. We report our experience in a cohort of patients with SD/SRNS during the administration of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in a prospective protocol initiated in January 2001. Twenty-six children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were included (21 steroid dependent and 5 steroid resistant), whose response did not change after sequential treatment with cyclophosphamide (CPM) and cyclosporine (CsA). Histopathologic patterns were: 11 minimal change disease (MCD), 1 diffuse mesangial proliferation (DMP), 13 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and membranous 1 glomerulonephritis (MGN). The median age of onset of NS was 2.8 years (range 1.2-12.5), and treatment with MMF was performed at a median age of 11.4 years (range 5-17) with an initial dose of 600 mg/m(2)/12 h, adjusted to maintain levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA) at 2.5-5 mcg/ml. The planned duration of study to assess treatment efficacy was 6 months. The mean MMF dose required was 624 (SD=136) mg/m(2)/12 h (range 415-970), which maintained mean C(0)-MPA levels of 2.9 (SD=1.17) mcg/ml (range 1.2-5.9 mcg/ml). In the five patients with SRNS, only one achieved complete remission. In the patients with SDNS, steroid sparing was achieved in 15 and 9 remained in remission on MMF monotherapy. Withdrawal of MMF resulted in immediate relapse in 47%. In our study, MMF was a useful immunosuppressant due to its fewer undesirable effects and similar efficacy to other drugs used. It appears effective for the maintenance of remission in SDNS patients, with a response similar to that of CsA.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children, who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome, achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond to corticosteroids may be treated with immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil or cyclosporin or with non-immunosuppressive agents such as ACE inhibitors. Optimal combinations of these agents with least toxicity remain to be determined. The aims of this systematic review are to assess the benefits and harms of interventions used to treat idiopathic steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of all interventions for children with SRNS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged 3 months to 18 years with SRNS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently searched the literature, determined trial eligibility, assessed quality, extracted data and entered it in RevMan. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were pooled using the random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine RCTs involving 225 children were included. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission (three trials, 49 children: RR for persistent nephrotic syndrome 0.64, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the number of children who achieved complete remission between oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone and prednisone alone (two trials, 91 children: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.36), between intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral cyclophosphamide (one study, 11 children: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.39) and between azathioprine with prednisone and prednisone alone (one trial 31 children: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.32). No RCTs were identified comparing combination regimens comprising high dose steroids, alkylating agents or cyclosporin with single agents, placebo or no treatment.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Further adequately powered and well designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of cyclosporin and to evaluate other regimens for idiopathic SRNS including high dose steroids with alkylating agents or cyclosporin.

Interventions for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review

In a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT), we aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of all interventions for children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Nine RCTs involving 225 children were included. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission [3 trials, 49 children, relative risk (RR) for persistent nephrotic syndrome 0.64, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.47-0.88]. There was no significant difference in the number of children who achieved complete remission between oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone and prednisone alone [2 trials, 91 children, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74-1.36], between intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral cyclophosphamide [1 study, 11 children, RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-1.39], and between azathioprine with prednisone and prednisone alone [1 trial, 31 children, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.77-1.32]. No RCTs were identified comparing combination regimens comprising high-dose steroids, alkylating agents or cyclosporin with single agents, placebo, or no treatment. Further adequately powered and well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of cyclosporin and to evaluate regimens of high-dose steroids with alkylating agents or cyclosporin for SRNS.

The management of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children

Childhood nephrotic syndrome is a rare condition with an incidence of 1-2 per 100000 children aged below 16 years. Untreated idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is associated with increased risks of life-threatening infection, thromboembolism, lipid abnormalities, and malnutrition. The aim of the management of INS in children is to induce and maintain complete remission with resolution of proteinuria and edema without serious adverse effects of therapy. The majority of children have corticosteroid sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (CSINS), and in these children, corticosteroid therapy is the mainstay of therapy to induce remission. Data from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that prolonged courses of corticosteroids (up to 7 months) given in the first episode of CSINS reduce the risk of relapse. Nevertheless, many children relapse, and are at risk of corticosteroid toxicity if frequent courses of corticosteroids are required. Data from RCTs supports the use of alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil), cyclosporine, and levamisole in these children to achieve prolonged periods of remission. The specific management of corticosteroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (CRINS) is more difficult since few therapies are consistently effective, and data from RCTs are limited. In such children, cyclosporine, alkylating agents, and high dose intravenous methylprednisone may be used. In addition to specific therapies for INS, supportive therapies are commonly used to control edema (loop diuretics, aldosterone antagonists, albumin infusions, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), reduce the risk of infection (antibacterials, pneumococcal vaccination) and thromboembolism (aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid]), and to control hyperlipidemia (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors), especially in children with CRINS.

Intravenous cyclophosphamide in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

We prospectively examined the effect of treatment with intravenous cyclophosphamide in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Twenty-four patients (minimal change disease in 11, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 9, and mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis in 4), who did not show remission of proteinuria despite treatment with 8 weeks of oral prednisolone and six intravenous pulses of dexamethasone, were studied. Cyclophosphamide was administered intravenously, at a dose of 750 mg/m(2) once a month for 6 months; therapy with alternate-day prednisolone was continued. The mean (SD) age at treatment was 7.8 (4.0) years; 18 patients had initial resistance and 6 had late resistance. At the end of 6 months treatment, 7 (29.2%) patients each had complete remission (absent proteinuria, normal serum albumin) and partial remission (1-2+ proteinuria, normal serum albumin). Ten (41.6%) patients showed no response to therapy. The mean time to complete or partial remission, after initiation of treatment with cyclophosphamide, was 2.4+/-1.7 months and 2.7+/-1.8 months, respectively. Most responders (85.8% complete and 57.2% partial responders) achieved remission by the third dose of pulse cyclophosphamide. More patients with late resistance (50%) compared with initial resistance (22.2%) achieved complete remission. Partial remission was transient and lasted for a mean duration of 6.4+/-3.5 months. Serious infections were observed during therapy in 5 patients. On long-term follow-up, 5 (20.8%) patients were in remission, while nephrotic-range proteinuria or end-stage renal disease was seen in 17 (70.8%). Findings from the present study suggest that therapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide has limited efficacy in inducing sustained remission in patients with initial corticosteroid resistance. Sustained remission is likely to occur in a significant proportion of patients with late resistance and those with absence of significant tubulointerstitial changes on renal histology.

Steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid Resistant-Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) is a chronic, progressive disorder affecting upto 10% of all children with NS. It causes morbidity and mortality due to persistent edema, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, thrombosis and infection. Progression to renal failure was thought to be inevitable in survivors. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of the disease has identified several responsible genes and proteins. Studies have shown that long term aggressive therapy with combinations of steroids, alkylating agents and cyclosporine, cause complete or partial remission in 20-80% patients. The use of nonspecific renal protective agents such as the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin 2 receptor blockers, and anti-lipid agents retard disease progression. Although these are indications of significant improvement in outcome, further multicentre controlled studies are required to determine the optimum drugs and regimens to be used.