1
|
Amiri S, Akbarabadi M, Abdolali F, Nikoofar A, Esfahani AJ, Cheraghi S. Radiomics analysis on CT images for prediction of radiation-induced kidney damage by machine learning models. Comput Biol Med 2021; 133:104409. [PMID: 33940534 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to assess the power of radiomic features based on computed tomography to predict risk of chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing radiation therapy of abdominal cancers. METHODS 50 patients were evaluated for chronic kidney disease 12 months after completion of abdominal radiation therapy. At the first step, the region of interest was automatically extracted using deep learning models in computed tomography images. Afterward, a combination of radiomic and clinical features was extracted from the region of interest to build a radiomic signature. Finally, six popular classifiers, including Bernoulli Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine, were used to predict chronic kidney disease. Evaluation criteria were as follows: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve. RESULTS Most of the patients (58%) experienced chronic kidney disease. A total of 140 radiomic features were extracted from the segmented area. Among the six classifiers, Random Forest performed best with the accuracy and AUC of 94% and 0.99, respectively. CONCLUSION Based on the quantitative results, we showed that a combination of radiomic and clinical features could predict chronic kidney radiation toxicities. The effect of factors such as renal radiation dose, irradiated renal volume, and urine volume 24-h on CKD was proved in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Amiri
- Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mina Akbarabadi
- Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Fatemeh Abdolali
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Alberta University, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Alireza Nikoofar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Azam Janati Esfahani
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Paramedical Sciences and Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
| | - Susan Cheraghi
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park JS, Yu JI, Lim DH, Nam H, Kim YI, Lee J, Kang WK, Park SH, Kim ST, Hong JY, Sohn TS, Lee JH, An JY, Choi MG, Bae JM. Impact of Radiotherapy on Kidney Function among Patients Who Received Adjuvant Treatment for Gastric Cancer: Logistic and Linear Regression Analyses. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:59. [PMID: 33379195 PMCID: PMC7794775 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the incidence of renal function impairment after adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer and analyzed the impact of radiotherapy on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) five years after gastric surgery. We reviewed the medical records of 1490 patients with stomach cancer who underwent curative surgery and adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. Finally, we included 663 patients who were followed up for ≥5 years without disease recurrence and whose baseline eGFR was ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to determine independent factors associated with the five-year eGFR. A total of 13 (2.0%) patients developed renal function impairment (five-year eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). In logistic regression analysis, the baseline eGFR was identified as a prognostic factor for renal function impairment (odds ratio (OR), 0.878; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.831-0.927; p < 0.001), but radiotherapy was not (OR, 1.130; 95% CI, 0.366-3.491; p = 0.832). In linear regression analysis, age (B = -0.350, p < 0.001), baseline eGFR (B = 0.576, p < 0.001), cisplatin (B = -2.056, p = 0.010), and radiotherapy (B = -2.628, p < 0.001) were predictive variables for the five-year eGFR. Among patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy, age (B = -0.277, p < 0.001), hypertension (B = -4.986, p = 0.004), baseline eGFR (B = 0.665, p < 0.001), and volume of the kidneys receiving ≥20 Gy (B = -0.209, p = 0.012) were predictive variables for the five-year eGFR. Development of renal function impairment after adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer was rare among patients with normal baseline kidney function. While radiotherapy was negatively associated with the five-year eGFR, its impact would have been minimal if the kidneys were properly shielded. Further studies are needed to confirm the impact of radiotherapy in patients with poor kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Su Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Sejong 30099, Korea; (J.S.P.); (Y.I.K.)
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea;
| | - Do Hoon Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea;
| | - Heerim Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea;
| | - Young Il Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Sejong 30099, Korea; (J.S.P.); (Y.I.K.)
| | - Jeeyun Lee
- Department of Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (J.L.); (W.K.K.); (S.H.P.); (S.T.K.); (J.Y.H.)
| | - Won Ki Kang
- Department of Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (J.L.); (W.K.K.); (S.H.P.); (S.T.K.); (J.Y.H.)
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Department of Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (J.L.); (W.K.K.); (S.H.P.); (S.T.K.); (J.Y.H.)
| | - Seung Tae Kim
- Department of Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (J.L.); (W.K.K.); (S.H.P.); (S.T.K.); (J.Y.H.)
| | - Jung Yong Hong
- Department of Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (J.L.); (W.K.K.); (S.H.P.); (S.T.K.); (J.Y.H.)
| | - Tae Sung Sohn
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (T.S.S.); (J.H.L.); (J.Y.A.); (M.G.C.); (J.M.B.)
| | - Jun Ho Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (T.S.S.); (J.H.L.); (J.Y.A.); (M.G.C.); (J.M.B.)
| | - Ji Yeong An
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (T.S.S.); (J.H.L.); (J.Y.A.); (M.G.C.); (J.M.B.)
| | - Min Gew Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (T.S.S.); (J.H.L.); (J.Y.A.); (M.G.C.); (J.M.B.)
| | - Jae Moon Bae
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (T.S.S.); (J.H.L.); (J.Y.A.); (M.G.C.); (J.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McMahon BA, Rosner MH. GFR Measurement and Chemotherapy Dosing in Patients with Kidney Disease and Cancer. KIDNEY360 2020; 1:141-150. [PMID: 35372903 PMCID: PMC8809099 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000952019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapeutic agents require precise dosing to ensure optimal efficacy and minimize complications. For those agents that are removed from the body by the kidney, accurate knowledge of GFR is critical. In addition, GFR needs to be determined rapidly, easily, and, if possible, with little additional cost. The ability to easily measure GFR also allows for rapid detection of nephrotoxicity. Current methodologies include direct clearance measurement of an indicator substance or estimation of creatinine clearance or GFR through regression equations that use a serum marker, such as creatinine or cystatin C. These methodologies all have shortfalls and limitations, some of which are specific to the patient with cancer. Newer methodologies that directly measure GFR are in clinical trials and offer the ability to rapidly and noninvasively provide accurate estimates of drug clearance as well as detection of nephrotoxicity. These methods offer the opportunity to refine drug dosing and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blaithin A. McMahon
- Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; and
| | - Mitchell H. Rosner
- Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maximova N, Gregori M, Simeone R, Sonzogni A, Zanon D, Boz G, D'Antiga L. Total body irradiation and iron chelation treatment are associated with pancreatic injury following pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Oncotarget 2018; 9:19543-19554. [PMID: 29731964 PMCID: PMC5929407 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Whereas many studies have addressed the risk of organ dysfunction following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), little is known about pancreatic susceptibility in this setting. We aimed to investigate the effect of iron overload (IO) and total body irradiation (TBI) on pancreatic function of children undergoing HSCT. We retrospectively evaluated children admitted between 2012-2016 fulfilling the following criteria: normal pancreatic iron concentration (PIC), regular pancreatic function before HSCT, availability of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging with gradient-recalled-echo sequences and a full set of biochemical markers of IO and pancreatic function performed before HSCT and at discharge. We divided the patients according to the use of TBI or myeloablative chemotherapy (MCHT) in the conditioning regimen. All patients with severe IO or moderate IO with a high risk of engraftment delay or transplantation-related complications underwent chelation therapy with deferoxamine (DFO) from the first day of conditioning to discharge. 63 patients had a HSCT in the study period, 13 did not fulfill the inclusion criteria; 50 (25 in each group) are included in the analysis, and did not show differences at baseline evaluation. At follow up testing the TBI group showed a significantly higher PIC (107,8±100,3 μmol/g vs 28,4±37,9 in MCHT group, p<0,0001). In the TBI group the patients who had DFO treatment had higher PIC (223,2±48,8 μmol/g vs 55,7±10,5 without DFO treatment, p<0,0001), and all patients having PIC >100 μmol/g at follow up had DFO-based chelation therapy, versus 26% of those with lower PIC (p<0,0001). The number of patients presenting exocrine pancreatic dysfunctions one month after transplantation was significantly higher in the TBI group (48% vs 4%; p<0.0001). The mean pancreatic volume reduction was significantly greater in the TBI group (39,1% vs 0,9% in the MCHT group; p<0,05), and was significantly worse on those who received DFO therapy. Based on our data, we suggest that TBI is detrimental for pancreatic functions, and speculate that DFO may contribute to the rapid pancreatic IO observed in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Maximova
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Massimo Gregori
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberto Simeone
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Aurelio Sonzogni
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Davide Zanon
- Pharmacy, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giulia Boz
- Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Lorenzo D'Antiga
- Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Serarslan A, Ozbek Okumus N, Gursel B, Meydan D, Dastan Y, Aksu T. Dosimetric Comparison of Three Different Radiotherapy Techniques in Antrum-Located Stomach Cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 18:741-746. [PMID: 28441708 PMCID: PMC5464493 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.3.741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The current optimal radiotherapy (RT) planning technique for stomach cancer is controversial. The design of RT for stomach cancer is difficult and differs according to tumor localization. Dosimetric and clinical studies have been performed in patients with different tumor localizations. This may be the main source of inconsistencies in study results. For this reason, we attempted to find the optimal RT technique for patients with stomach cancer in similar locations. Methods: This study was based on the computed tomography datasets of 20 patients with antrum-located stomach cancer. For each patient, treatments were designed using physical wedge-based conformal RT (WB-CRT), field-in-field intensity-modulated RT (FIF-IMRT), and dynamic intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). The techniques were compared in terms of expected target volume coverage and the dose to organs at risk (OAR) using a dose-volume histogram analysis. Results: FIF-IMRT was the most homogenous technique, with a better homogeneity index than WBCRT (p<0.001) or IMRT (p<0.001). However, IMRT had a better conformity index than WBCRT (p<0.001) or FIF-IMRT (p<0.001). Additionally, all OAR, including the kidneys, liver, and spinal cord, were better protected with IMRT than with WBCRT (p=0.023 to <0.001) or FIF-IMRT (p=0.028 to <0.001). Conclusions: In comparison to FIF-IMRT and WBCRT, IMRT appears to be the most appropriate technique for antrum-located stomach cancer. To establish whether IMRT is superior overall will require clinical studies, taking into account differences in both tumor localization (cardia, body, and antrum) and organ movement in patients with stomach cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alparslan Serarslan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Radiation-induced injury of the exocrine pancreas after chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015; 118:535-9. [PMID: 26709067 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2015] [Revised: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 11/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The pancreas is located almost entirely within the treatment area for radiotherapy of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze radiation-induced injury of the exocrine pancreas. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 127 gastric cancer patients, who underwent preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy. A total dose of 45 Gy was given in 25 fractions. Concurrent chemotherapy was 5-fluorouracil-based. Lipase and α-amylase were assayed before, during and after treatment. RESULTS Lipase and α-amylase deficiencies were found in 48.2% and 19.7% of patients, respectively. In the univariant analysis, age and pretreatment α-amylase and lipase activities influenced on risk of injury of the exocrine pancreas (p<0.05). Younger patients (<65 years) had a lower risk of hypoamylasemia than older patients. The probability of insufficiency was lower than 0.2 for patients with pretreatment α-amylase and lipase activities above 50 U/L and 55 U/L, respectively. The multivariate analyses of the time to hypolipasemia showed that only pretreatment lipase activity was significant. CONCLUSIONS Gastric cancer patients have an increased risk of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after chemoradiotherapy. Thus, the pancreas should be regarded as an OAR. Measuring lipase activity should be the standard for assessing radiation-induced pancreatic injury.
Collapse
|
7
|
Sachsman S, Hoppe BS, Mendenhall NP, Holtzman A, Li Z, Slayton W, Joyce M, Sandler E, Flampouri S. Proton therapy to the subdiaphragmatic region in the management of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56:2019-24. [DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.975802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|