Neurocognitive function in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing primary or adjuvant chemoradiation treatment

Timeline of cognitive impairments after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: A review

Background

With advances in cancer treatments, long-term impairments of survivors have become more apparent. Radiotherapy of tumors in or near the brain can potentially induce cognitive impairments, impacting the quality of life of survivors. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive information on the timeline of cognitive impairments following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). To address this gap, we conducted a literature review on cognitive impairments observed after radiotherapy for HNC.

Methods

The literature review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. Search terms included the following keywords: head and neck tumors, radiotherapy, treatment responses, cognitive impairments, as well as variants and related subcategories.

Result

Our review encompassed 23 studies involving a total of 1059 HNC patients, predominantly nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Overall, studies indicated a decline in cognitive performance post-radiotherapy compared to baseline scores, control groups, or normative data. The literature on acute effects is scarce and studies with complete neuropsychological assessments are missing. Cognitive impairments were prevalent in the majority of patients at six to 12 months post-radiotherapy, with memory deficits being the most prominent. Long-term assessments demonstrated that these cognitive deficits persisted even beyond seven years, suggesting a potentially irreversible decline in cognition following radiotherapy.

Conclusion

Cognitive impairments are frequently observed at least six months after radiotherapy. Standardized cognitive assessments are imperative to evaluate impairments in individual patients. Future research in HNC should integrate neuropsychological evaluations to enhance our understanding of domain-specific impairments and the complete timeline of cognitive changes after radiotherapy.

Cancer neuroscience in head and neck: interactions, modulation, and therapeutic strategies

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is an aggressive malignancy with significant effects on the innervation. Not only is it at the top of the cancer spectrum with a dismal prognosis, but it also imposes considerable stress on patients and society owing to frequent neurological symptoms. With progress in cancer neuroscience, the interactions between HNC and the nervous system, as well as the underlying mechanisms, have become increasingly clear. Compelling evidence suggests communication of information between cancer and nerve cells and devastation of the neurological system with tumor growth. However, the thorough grasp of HNC in cancer neuroscience has been severely constrained by the intricacy of HNC and fragmented research. This review comprehensively organizes and summarizes the latest research on the crosstalk between HNC and the nervous system. It aims to clarify various aspects of the neurological system in HNC, including the physiology, progression, and treatment of cancer. Furthermore, the opportunities and challenges of cancer neuroscience in HNC are discussed, which offers fresh perspectives on the neurological aspects of HNC diagnosis and management.

Neurocognitive Functioning of Patients with Sinonasal and Nasopharyngeal Cancers Treated With Multimodality Therapy

Importance  Few recent studies have examined neurocognitive functioning (NCF) in patients with sinonasal and nasopharyngeal cancers (NPCs) prior to and following multimodality therapy or the potential differences in NCF by disease variables such as disease site. Objective  The objective of this study is to determine rates of NCF impairments prior to and following multimodality therapy, declines in NCF following radiotherapy (RT), and possible differences in NCF by the disease site. Design, Setting, and Participants  We conducted a retrospective chart review of 39 patients with sinonasal and NPCs who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. Twenty patients were evaluated prior to RT, of which eleven received follow-up evaluation after completion of RT. Nineteen patients were evaluated following various treatments without a pre-RT evaluation. Main Outcomes and Measures  Patients completed comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. Decline from pre-RT to follow-up was defined on the basis of reliable change indices. Results  Thirty-nine patients completed comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. For the entire cohort, the most frequently demonstrated impairments were in verbal memory (47%) and learning (43%), executive functioning (33%), and verbal fluency (22%). At post-RT follow-up, the most frequently observed declines were in verbal learning (46%) and memory (18%). Demographic and disease variables were not significantly associated with NCF at pre-RT or post-RT. Conclusion and Relevance  Patients with sinonasal and NPCs are at risk for NCF impairments in multiple areas at baseline and memory decline following RT. Future prospective studies are needed to investigate the impact of each treatment modality on NCF and specific risk factors for cognitive dysfunction.

Assessing Physical and Cognitive Function in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and associated treatments have significant long-term and late adverse effects that can impair function. Therefore, there is a need for reliable common metrics to assess function in HNC that limit participant burden and are cost-effective and easy to use in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using the Fitbit Zip, NIH Toolbox, and REDCap electronic data collection tool to measure function and symptoms in individuals with HNC and to explore preliminary findings.

METHODS

A prospective descriptive design with a total of 16 participants was used to assess function and symptoms pretreatment to 3 months post treatment initiation.

RESULTS

The enrollment rate was 49%, the retention rate was 81%, and the Fitbit Zip adherence rate was 86%. Exploratory analyses suggested a possible decline in physical activity and worsening symptom burden alongside improved attention and cognitive flexibility abilities ( P ≤ .05). There were no differences in strength, functional mobility, information processing, or perceived attentional function.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that use of the Fitbit Zip, NIH Toolbox, and REDCap data collection tool in HNC is feasible. Exploratory analyses suggest that the Fitbit Zip may be a sensitive measure of physical activity in HNC.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study provides preliminary evidence for metrics that could be used in the clinical settings to assess function and symptom distress in HNC. Integration of these measures, upon further validation, could help providers better identify patients in need of intervention.

Long-term cognitive, psychosocial, and neurovascular complications of unilateral head and neck irradiation in young to middle-aged adults

Background

With a growing, younger population of head and neck cancer survivors, attention to long-term side-effects of prior, often radiotherapeutic, treatment is warranted. Therefore, we studied the long-term cognitive effects in young adult patients irradiated for head and neck neoplasms (HNN).

Methods

Young to middle-aged adults with HNN (aged 18-40 years) and treated with unilateral neck irradiation ≥ 5 years before inclusion underwent cardiovascular risk and neuropsychological assessments and answered validated questionnaires regarding subjective cognitive complaints, fatigue, depression, quality of life, and cancer-specific distress. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to assess white matter hyperintensities (WMH), infarctions, and atrophy.

Results

Twenty-nine patients (aged 24–61, 13 men) median 9.2 [7.3–12.9] years post-treatment were included. HNN patients performed worse in episodic memory (Z-score = -1.16 [-1.58–0.34], p < 0.001) and reported more fatigue symptoms (Z-score = 1.75 [1.21–2.00], p < 0.001) compared to normative data. Furthermore, patients had a high level of fear of tumor recurrence (13 patients [44.8%]) and a heightened speech handicap index (13 patients [44.8%]). Only a small number of neurovascular lesions were found (3 infarctions in 2 patients and 0.11 [0.00–0.40] mL WMH), unrelated to the irradiated side. Cognitive impairment was not associated with WMH, brain atrophy, fatigue, or subjective speech problems.

Conclusions

HNN patients showed impairments in episodic memory and an increased level of fatigue ≥ 5 years after radiotherapy compared to normative data. Cognitive impairments could not be explained by WMH or brain atrophy on brain MRI or psychological factors.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04257968).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09295-9.

Early-Onset Micromorphological Changes of Neuronal Fiber Bundles During Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving cranial radiation face the risk of delayed brain dysfunction. However, an early medical imaging marker is not available until irreversible morphological changes emerge.

PURPOSE

To explore the micromorphological white matter changes during the radiotherapy session by utilizing an along-tract analysis framework.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Eighteen nasopharyngeal carcinoma (two female) patients receiving cranial radiation.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0 T; Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T1- and T2-weighted images (T1W, T2W); computed tomography (CT).

ASSESSMENT

Patients received three DTI imaging scans during the radiotherapy (RT), namely the baseline scan (1-2 days before RT began), the middle scan (the middle of the RT session), and the end scan (1-2 days after RT ended). Twelve fibers were segmented after whole-brain tractography. Then, the fractional anisotropy (FA) values and the cumulative radiation dose received for each fiber streamline were resampled and projected into their center fiber.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The contrast among the three scans (P1: middle scan-baseline scan; P2: end scan-middle scan; P3: end scan-baseline scan) were compared using the linear mixed model for each of the 12 center fibers. Then, a dose-responsiveness relationship was performed using Pearson correlation. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Six of the 12 center fibers showed significant changes of FA values during the RT but with heterogeneous patterns. The significant changes along a specific center fiber were associated with their cumulative dose received (Genu: P1 r = -0.6182, P2 r = -0.5907; Splenium: P1 r = 0.4055, P = 0.1063, P2 r = 0.6742; right uncinate fasciculus: P1 r = -0.3865, P2 r = -0.4912, P = 0.0533; right corticospinal tract: P1 r = 0.4273, P = 0.1122, P2 r = -0.6885).

DATA CONCLUSION

The along-tract analysis might provide sensitive measures on the early-onset micromorphological changes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Prevalence of neurocognitive and perceived speech deficits in patients with head and neck cancer before treatment: Associations with demographic, behavioral, and disease-related factors

Background

Neurocognition and speech, relevant domains in head and neck cancer (HNC), may be affected pretreatment. However, the prevalence of pretreatment deficits and their possible concurrent predictors are poorly understood.

Methods

Using an HNC prospective cohort (Netherlands Quality of Life and Biomedical Cohort Study, N ≥ 444) with a cross‐sectional design, we investigated the estimated prevalence of pretreatment deficits and their relationship with selected demographic, behavioral, and disease‐related factors.

Results

Using objective assessments, rates of moderate‐to‐severe neurocognitive deficit ranged between 4% and 8%. From patient‐reported outcomes, 6.5% of patients reported high levels of cognitive failures and 46.1% reported speech deficits. Patient‐reported speech functioning was worse in larynx compared to other subsites. Other nonspeech outcomes were unrelated to any variable. Patient‐reported neurocognitive and speech functioning were modestly correlated, especially in the larynx group.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that a subgroup of patients with HNC shows pretreatment deficits, possibly accentuated in the case of larynx tumors.

The Hippocampus: A New Organ at Risk for Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Bucco-alveolar Cancer? A Dosimetric and Biological Analysis

PURPOSE

A significant proportion of patients with bucco-alveolar cancer are long-term survivors, warranting attention to survivorship issues. Decline in neurocognitive function after cranial irradiation for brain tumors correlates with a hippocampal maximum dose (Dmax) of more than 16 Gy, minimum dose (Dmin) of more than 9 Gy, and dose to 40% of the hippocampal volume (D40%) exceeding 7.3 Gy in 2-Gy equivalent dose (EQD2), respectively. We analyzed the utility of sparing the hippocampus in postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for patients with bucco-alveolar cancer, given the proximity of target volumes to the hippocampus, by virtue of inclusion of the infratemporal fossa.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We instituted hippocampal sparing for patients with bucco-alveolar cancer receiving PORT in March 2018. Ten prior and 10 subsequent consecutive patients with pathologically staged I-IVA cancers of the buccal mucosa, alveolus, and retromolar trigone formed the control group (no hippocampal sparing) and the study group (hippocampal sparing), respectively. The brain and temporal lobes were prescribed dose constraints in both groups. Patients received doses of 60 to 66 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction using the image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy / volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. Treatment plans were evaluated for (1) hippocampal dosimetric parameters, (2) planning target volume dosimetry and plan-quality indices, and (3) biological indices of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) for impaired neurocognitive function.

RESULTS

Hippocampal sparing significantly reduced the hippocampal DmaxEQD2, DmeanEQD2, and D40%EQD2 from 27 Gy to 10.9 Gy (P = .002), 14.3 Gy to 6.4 Gy (P = .002), and 15.5 Gy to 6.6 Gy (P = .005), respectively, with comparable plan-quality indices. The radiobiologically robust endpoints of ipsilateral hippocampal EUD (P = .005) and NTCP (P = .01) were statistically significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Meaningful dosimetric benefit, corroborated with radiobiological indices, was observed with hippocampal sparing. The feasibility and benefit of hippocampal sparing supports our view that the hippocampus should be incorporated as an organ at risk and attention should be given to neurocognitive function in patients with bucco-alveolar cancer who are receiving PORT.

Use of the Geriatric-8 screening tool to predict prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer: A prospective, observational study

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the usefulness of geriatric assessment screening tools for predicting prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer (HNC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The geriatric-8 (G8) screening tool was administered to 78 older adults with HNC at their first visit to the hospital before any treatments. The ability of the G8 to predict survival was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and determining the cut-off value using Youden's Index. The G8 and other factors related to prognosis (age, performance status (PS), Charlson comorbidity index, number of oral medicines (polypharmacy), the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for biological nutrition status, and treatment intent (curative or palliative)) were validated by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The survival analysis was validated in a propensity score-weighting cohort to correct for confounding factors. Correlations between these factors and complications were examined using Fishers exact test.

RESULTS

The G8 cut-off value for overall survival was 10.5 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.82). In the propensity score-weighted cohort, on Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the hazard ratio of an abnormal G8 (<11) was 3.70 [1.59-8.61 (p = 0.002)], and the hazard ratio of PS-abnormal (≥2) was 0.85 [0.09-7.60 (p = 0.88)]. Thirty-day mortality and all-complication rates were significantly higher in the G8-abnormal group. Neither major complications nor transfer to other institutions was correlated with an abnormal G8.

CONCLUSION

The G8 was a strong prognostic factor and a possible predictor of complications in older adults with HNC.

Regulatory coupling between long noncoding RNAs and senescence in irradiated microglia

Background

Microglia have been implicated in the pathogenesis of radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI), which severely influences the quality of life during long-term survival. Recently, irradiated microglia were speculated to present an aging-like phenotype. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been recognized to regulate a wide spectrum of biological processes, including senescence; however, their potential role in irradiated microglia remains largely uncharacterized.

Methods

We used bioinformatics and experimental methods to identify and analyze the senescence phenotype of irradiated microglia. Western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, immunofluorescence, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were performed to clarify the relationship between the radiation-induced differentially expressed lncRNAs (RILs) and the distinctive molecular features of senescence in irradiated microglia.

Results

We found that the senescence of microglia could be induced using ionizing radiation (IR). A mutual regulation mode existed between RILs and three main features of the senescence phenotype in irradiated microglia: inflammation, the DNA damage response (DDR), and metabolism. Specifically, for inflammation, the expression of two selected RILs (ENSMUST00000190863 and ENSMUST00000130679) was dependent on the major inflammatory signaling pathways of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). The two RILs modulated the activation of NF-κB/MAPK signaling and subsequent inflammatory cytokine secretion. For the DDR, differential severity of DNA damage altered the expression profiles of RILs. The selected RIL, ENSMUST00000130679, promoted the DDR. For metabolism, blockade of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-mediated lipogenesis attenuated the fold-change of several RILs induced by IR.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that certain RILs interacted with senescence in irradiated microglia. RILs actively participated in the regulation of senescence features, suggesting that RILs could be promising intervention targets to treat RIBI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-020-02001-1.

A multidimensional cohort study of late toxicity after intensity modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the occurrence of late toxicity after curatively intended intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for sinonasal cancer and assess dose-response associations.

METHODS

Patients treated with IMRT in 2008-2016 were included. Cross sectional examinations of toxicity from the optic pathway, the brain, the pituitary gland and the nose were performed along with quality of life - (QoL) and dose-response analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled; median age was 67 years (range 47-83). Five patients (19%) had radiation-related ocular toxicity. The risk of visual acuity impairment increased with increasing dose (grade 2 odds ration (OR) 1.12, p = 0.01; grade 3 OR 1.14, p = 0.02) and dose constraint violations (grade 2, OR = 21, p < 0.01; grade 3, OR = 41, p < 0.01). Six patients (22%) exhibited evidence of radiation-related hypopituitarism, but no dose-response association was detected. Seventeen patients (63%) had impaired olfactory function. The risk of olfactory impairment increased with higher stage (OR = 3.32, p = 0.03). Three patients (11%) had structural abnormalities in irradiated areas of the brain, and impaired cognitive function was present in 17 patients (63%). Cognitive, physical, role functioning as well as fatigue and insomnia were affected the most in QOL analyses. Fifteen patients (56%) had grade 2 radiation-related impairment in at least one organ. Grade 3 toxicity was only present in patients with toxicities in >3 organs and in patients initially treated for T4 tumours. Three patients (11%) had radiation-related impaired function in all examined OARs.

CONCLUSION

Late toxicity after radiotherapy was substantial in all examined organs, with dose-response associations between visual acuity impairment and the optic nerve. The results have led to changed praxis for follow-up examinations in Denmark.

Initial psychometric testing of the Head and Neck Cancer Patient Self-Management Inventory (HNC-PSMI)

PURPOSE

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment are associated with significant symptom burden and functional impairment. HNC patients must engage in intensive and complex self-management protocols to minimize acute and late treatment effects. Self-management among HNC patients is understudied due to the limited availability of disease-specific self-management measures. This article describes the initial psychometric testing of the HNC Patient Self-Management Inventory (HNC-PSMI), an instrument that characterizes self-management tasks in the HNC population.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey design was used. One hundred HNC patients completed the HNC-PSMI, the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Cancer Symptom Survey plus General Symptom Survey, and the Profile of Mood States-Short Form. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the HNC-PSMI, the relevance of items, internal consistency of domain item responses, and the direction and strength of associations between domain scores and other measures were examined.

RESULTS

There was variability both in the number of self-management tasks performed overall and in each domain as well as in the reported difficulty completing those tasks. Kuder-Richardson values for domains with > 3 items ranged from 0.61 to 0.86. Hypothesized associations were supported.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the psychometric properties for the HNC-PSMI were acceptable. The HNC-PSMI can be used to advance an understanding of self-management requirements and challenges in HNC patients.

Assessment of Neurocognitive Impairment and Speech Functioning Before Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

Importance

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment may negatively alter neurocognitive and speech functioning. However, the prevalence of neurocognitive impairment among patients with HNC before treatment is poorly studied, and the association between neurocognitive and speech functioning is unknown, which hampers good interpretability of the effect of HNC treatment on neurocognitive and speech function.

Objectives

To document neurocognitive functioning in patients with HNC before treatment and to investigate the association between neurocognitive and speech functioning.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prospective cohort study of newly diagnosed patients with HNC before treatment using a large sample obtained in a nationwide, multicenter setting (Netherlands Quality of Life and Biomedical Cohort Study in Head and Neck Cancer [NET-QUBIC] project).

Main Outcome and Measures

Objective neuropsychological measures of delayed recall, letter fluency, and executive functioning, as well as patient-reported outcome measures on neurocognitive speech and functioning, were collected before treatment.

Results

In total, 254 patients with HNC participated (71.7% male), with a mean (SD) age of 62 (10) years. The response rate ranged from 81.9% (208 of 254) to 84.6% (215 of 254). Objective neurocognitive measures indicated that 4.7% (10 of 212) to 15.0% (32 of 214) of patients were initially seen with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Mild to moderate impairment was found in 12.3% (26 of 212) to 26.2% (56 of 214) of patients. The most altered domains were delayed recall and letter fluency. Seven percent (15 of 208) of the patients reported high levels of everyday neurocognitive failure, and 42.6% (89 of 209) reported speech problems. Objective neurocognitive function was not significantly associated with patient-reported neurocognitive or speech functioning, but the results from patient-reported outcome measures were significantly correlated.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study demonstrate a high prevalence of impaired speech functioning among patients with HNC before treatment, which is in line with previous findings. A novel finding is that neurocognitive impairment is also highly prevalent as objectively measured and as self-perceived. Understanding the reason why patients with HNC are initially seen with neurocognitive impairment before the start of treatment is important because this impairment may complicate patient-clinician interaction and alter treatment adherence and because treatment itself may further worsen cognitive functioning. In addition, low self-perceived neurocognitive and speech functioning before treatment may decrease a patient's confidence in communicative participation and perceived quality of life. Disentangling the associations between objective and patient-reported neurocognitive and speech functions is an important area for future research.

A cross sectional study in cognitive and neurobehavioral impairment in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To determine neurocognitive and neurobehavioral impairment in long-term nasopharyngeal cancer survivors (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

A cross-sectional cohort of NPC ≥4 years (y) following IMRT was assessed. Objective cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and patient-reported memory was assessed with the MDASI-HN problems remembering item. Patient and family ratings of patients' neurobehavioral symptoms of apathy, disinhibition and executive dysfunction were assessed with the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe). Other patient-reported symptoms (MDASI-HN), mood (HADS), and quality of life (FACT-H&N) were also collected.

RESULTS

Among 102 participants: M:F = 66:36; median age 56y (32-77); median time since IMRT 7.5y (4.2-11.1). Impaired MoCA scores (<23) were observed in 33 (32%). Patient and family ratings of pre-illness neurobehavioral symptoms were in the normal range (total FrSBe T-scores 53.3 and 59.0 respectively). In contrast, post-treatment patient and family T-scores were clinically impaired (64.7, 71.3 respectively), with apathy, disinhibition and executive dysfunction post-treatment ratings all significantly worse than pre-treatment (p < 0.001). Prevalence of clinically significant post-treatment disturbance was high by patient and family ratings (48%/66% apathy, 35%/53% disinhibition, 39%/56% executive dysfunction). Post-treatment neurobehavioral symptoms strongly correlated with lower quality of life (r = -0.62) and higher anxiety (r = 0.62) and depression scores (r = 0.67, all p < 0.001). Total MoCA scores did not correlate with RT dose. However, greater declines in apathy, disinhibition and executive dysfunction were associated with receiving >75 Gy to temporal lobes.

CONCLUSION

NPC treated with IMRT had moderate to high rates of neurocognitive impairment and clinically significant apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction.

Association of Neurocognitive Deficits With Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Importance

Neurocognitive deficits (NCD) have been observed in noncentral nervous system cancers, yet short- and long-term neurocognitive data on patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) are lacking.

Objective

To assess objective neurocognitive function before and after definitive radiation therapy for HNC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In a prospective, longitudinal study, neurocognitive function and self-reported symptoms were assessed in 80 patients with histologically proven HNC requiring definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy and in 40 healthy controls 4 times (baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline) prior to commencing treatment at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Neurocognitive test scores were converted to age-corrected z scores (mean, 0; standard deviation, 1) and reported as mean scores, standardized regression-based scores, and frequencies of impairments in intellectual capacity, concentration, memory, executive function, processing speed, and motor dexterity. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with NCD 2 years after treatment.

Results

Eighty patients and 40 healthy controls enrolled. Analyses revealed significant differences between patient and control mean performance in some domains, with patient deficits increasing over time: intellectual capacity (Cohen d, effect sizes [95% CIs] of -0.46 [-0.64 to 0.30], -0.51 [-0.72 to -0.30], and -0.70 [-0.92 to -0.49] for time points 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively); concentration/short-term attention span (-0.19 [-0.37 to 0.00], -0.38 [-0.55 to -0.21], -0.54 [-0.71 to -0.37]); verbal memory (-0.16 [-0.33 to 0.02], -0.38 [-0.64 to -0.12], -0.53 [-0.74 to -0.32]); executive function (-0.14 [-0.27 to 0.00], -0.34 [-0.52 to -0.16], -0.43 [-0.64 to -0.22]), and global cognitive function composite (-0.38 [-0.55 to -0.22], -0.75 [-0.92 to -0.58], -1.06 [-1.26 to -0.86]). There was an increased rate of impaired global neurocognitive functioning among patients (38%) at 24 months compared with controls (0%). Neurocognitive deficits were not associated with baseline cytokines.

Conclusions and Relevance

Head and neck cancer survivors have neurocognitive sequelae up to 2 years after definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiation treatment. Patients and health care teams should know about such potential risks. Further research is warranted in search of strategies to avoid, reduce, and compensate for declines.

The Older Adult With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Knowledge Gaps and Future Direction in Assessment and Treatment

Older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) pose unique treatment and supportive care challenges to oncologists and other cancer care providers. The majority of patients with HNSCC present with locoregionally advanced disease, for which combined-modality treatment integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy is often necessary to maximize tumor control. However, applying these approaches to an older population with concomitant comorbidities and a higher risk of functional impairments remains challenging and is exacerbated by the paucity of studies involving older adults. The purpose of this article is to identify knowledge gaps in the evaluation and management of older adults with HNSCC-particularly those undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy-and their caregivers through a review of the literature conducted by clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. The findings highlight the importance of a geriatric assessment and the therapeutic paradigms and challenges relevant to this population. Furthermore, we identify the need for additional research and interventions related to key supportive care issues that arise during and after treatment in older adults with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. On the basis of our findings, we prioritize these issues to guide future patient-oriented research endeavors to address these knowledge gaps and thus better serve this growing patient population.

Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the American Cancer Society Guideline

Purpose This guideline provides recommendations on the management of adults after head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, focusing on surveillance and screening for recurrence or second primary cancers, assessment and management of long-term and late effects, health promotion, care coordination, and practice implications. Methods ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. The American Cancer Society (ACS) HNC Survivorship Care Guideline was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Expert Panel reviewed the content and recommendations, offering modifications and/or qualifying statements when deemed necessary. Results The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the ACS HNC Survivorship Care Guideline, published in 2016, is clear, thorough, clinically practical, and helpful, despite the limited availability of high-quality evidence to support many of the recommendations. ASCO endorsed the ACS HNC Survivorship Care Guideline, adding qualifying statements aimed at promoting team-based, multispecialty, multidisciplinary, collaborative head and neck survivorship care. Recommendations The ASCO Expert Panel emphasized that caring for HNC survivors requires a team-based approach that includes primary care clinicians, oncology specialists, otolaryngologists, dentists, and other allied professionals. The HNC treatment team should educate the primary care clinicians and patients about the type(s) of treatment received, the likelihood of potential recurrence, and the potential late and long-term complications. Primary care clinicians should recognize symptoms of recurrence and coordinate a prompt evaluation. They should also be prepared to manage late effects either directly or by referral to appropriate specialists. Health promotion is critical, particularly regarding tobacco cessation and dental care. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/HNC-Survivorship-endorsement and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .