Effectiveness of preoperative group education for patients with colorectal cancer: managing expectations

Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations (part 1)-2025 update

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocols include evidence-based interventions designed to improve patient experience, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes while reducing healthcare-related costs. This is the first update of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care before cesarean delivery after the original publication in 2018.

METHODS

Interventions were selected based on expert consensus using the Delphi method. An updated literature search was conducted in September 2024 using the Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Targeted searches were performed by a medical librarian to identify relevant articles published since the 2018 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guidelines publication, which evaluated each antenatal and preoperative enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery intervention, focusing on randomized clinical trials and large observational studies (≥800 patients) to maximize search feasibility and relevance. Following a review of the evidence, a consensus was reached regarding the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation for each proposed intervention according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

The 6 recommended enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery interventions are (1) antenatal pathway patient education for scheduled caesarean delivery (evidence low to very low, recommendation strong); (2) multidisciplinary medical and surgical staff education regarding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery support, intervention implementation, and measurement (evidence low, recommendation strong); (3) optimization of the medical care for pregnant patients with comorbid conditions, such as anemia, obesity, hypertension, prepregnancy and gestational diabetes, smoking (tobacco, cannabis, vaping), congenital heart disease, epilepsy, autoimmune disease, and asthma (evidence moderate, recommendation strong); (4) abdominal skin preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated cloth (evening before scheduled cesarean delivery) (evidence moderate; recommendation weak); (5) the duration of preoperative fasting based on the content intake (evidence low, recommendation weak); (6) the use of a preoperative, nonparticulate carbohydrate drink (evidence low-moderate, recommendation strong).

CONCLUSION

The first 3 recommendations are for use in the antenatal period (10-38 weeks of gestation), which allow for the optimization of patient comorbidities, whereas the remaining 3 recommendations are for preoperative interventions (skin preparation, preoperative fasting directives, and preoperative carbohydrate supplementation). Educational tools for cesarean delivery with well-designed shared decision-making focus on comorbidity management should be developed. These management tasks are viewed as routine care; however, the measurable success and impact have clinical variance. The enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery goal for patients who are undergoing a scheduled caesarean delivery is to maximize the quality of the pregnant patient's recovery and the fetal-neonatal outcome.

Resilience and Counseling Received by Colorectal Cancer Patients During a 1-Year Follow-Up: PHASE II of a Longitudinal Study

Longitudinal studies on the resilience of colorectal cancer patients and the counseling they receive are rare. This study's purpose was threefold: to describe the resilience and received counseling of colorectal cancer patients after 1 year post surgery; the relationships between background characteristics, resilience, and counseling; and the changes that occurred in the findings. Data were collected in Finland in 2020-2023 after 1 month (phase I) and a year (phase II) of the colorectal cancer surgery using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale© and the Counseling Quality Instrument©. A total of 103 participants completed phase I, 51 participants completed phase II, and 41 participants completed both phases. Phase II of the study showed that among the respondents (n = 51), resilience was low (mean 73.3) and significantly related to marital status (p = .007). Most (75%) evaluated counseling as good, and the evaluations were similar in both study phases (n = 103, n = 51). The lowest scores were for psychosocial support, patient-centeredness, and goal-directedness. Knowledge of the illness and its care, general health and patient attitudes, and disease treatment and self-care decreased significantly within the year (n = 41). Changes in resilience were not found (n = 41). The findings suggest that colorectal cancer patients might need more psychosocial support. Patients' care should be carefully planned to better address their needs.

A multimodal prehabilitation class for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a pragmatic randomised type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation promotes postoperative recovery through preoperative optimisation; however, few studies have been conducted under real-world conditions. Our objective was to determine the extent to which a multimodal prehabilitation programme influenced intermediate and late recovery post-colorectal surgery in a type 1 effectiveness-implementation and randomised pragmatic trial. We hypothesised that a prehabilitation class, as part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway, would reduce length of hospital stay (LOS).

METHODS

Adult male and female patients with colorectal disease requiring an elective primary resection at a single centre were randomised to the intervention or standard care group at least 2 weeks before surgery. All participants attended an ERAS class, which was extended to include prehabilitation components of nutrition education, supplements, walking with a smartwatch, functional exercises, and deep breathing in the intervention group. Effectiveness outcomes included LOS (primary) and 6-min walking distance (6MWD; secondary outcome) at 6 weeks post-surgery. Implementation outcomes included adherence to prescribed step count and nutrient intakes. Multivariable regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, type of surgery, and COVID-19.

RESULTS

The study ended prematurely. In total, 110 patients were included. Two-thirds had cancer and mean prehabilitation duration was 17.2 (sd 5.5) days. LOS was not different between groups. Preoperative median step count did not differ between groups, but protein inadequacy (prevalence ratio: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.36-0.82]) decreased substantially with prehabilitation. After surgery, the mean difference in 6MWD was +38 m (95% CI: 9-67 m) for prehabilitation vs control, indicating earlier functional recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

A pragmatic prehabilitation programme did not influence length of hospital stay (underpowered because of early trial termination), but did reduce preoperative protein inadequacy (implementation outcome) and improve early functional recovery (secondary outcome).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04247776).

An Online Preoperative Screening Tool to Optimize Care for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Mixed-Method Study Protocol

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Despite surgery being the primary curative treatment for cancer, patients with compromised preoperative physical, nutritional, and psychological status are often at a higher risk for complications. While various screening tools exist to assess physical, nutritional, and psychological status, there is currently no standardised self-reporting tool, or established cut-off points for comprehensive risk assessment. This study aims to develop, validate, and implement an online self-reporting preoperative screening tool that identifies modifiable risk factors in cancer surgery patients.

METHODS

This mixed-methods study consists of three distinct stages: (1) Development-(i) a scoping review to identify available physical, nutritional, and psychological screening tools; (ii) a Delphi study to gain consensus on the use of available screening tools; and (iii) a development of the online screening tool to determine patients at high risk of postoperative complications. (2) Testing-a prospective cohort study determining the correlation between at-risk patients and postoperative complications. (3) Implementation-the formulation of an implementation policy document considering feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The timely identification of high-risk patients, based on their preoperative physical, nutritional, and psychological statuses, would enable referral to targeted interventions. The implementation of a preoperative online screening tool would streamline this identification process while minimising unwarranted variation in preoperative treatment optimisation. This systematic approach would not only support high-risk patients but also allow for more efficient provision of surgery to low-risk patients through effective risk stratification.

Construction and Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program for the Surgical Management of Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Modified Delphi Study

OBJECTIVE

As an effective treatment for spinal metastasis (SM), ERAS protocol can significantly reduce the length of hospital stay and complications in patients. Establishing an ERAS program for perioperative care after SM surgery is a clinical problem that needs to be addressed urgently. We aimed to develop an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program and Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) that conferred clinical benefit to patients with SM and made it relatively easy to manage the condition. We believe that our findings could help establish and promote the continuous improvement of additional ERAS programs for SM.

METHODS

This is a modified Delphi study. We used a two-round process using data acquired from a review of relevant literature and involving a multidisciplinary panel of experts from different hospitals in China. The modified Delphi survey was conducted from February 1, 2024 to April 20, 2024. The experts were invited to evaluate each of the current relevant ERAS recommended topics to determine the appropriateness of inclusion in the ERAS program and SSC with the 5-point Likert scale. Used the results to create specific ERAS and SSC (70% consensus) programs. Close to consensus (65%-69% consensus) findings were considered for the follow-up survey.

RESULTS

A multicenter, multidisciplinary group of physicians (n = 75), including clinical workers, researchers, anesthesiologists, nursing specialists, psychologists, nutritionists, and caregivers, with experience in managing patients with SM, were asked to participate. Using the modified Delphi process, we arrived at a consensus for the ERAS program. This included 37 consolidated items in the domains in the following order: preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and discharge. The SSC included 37 consolidated items in the domains in the following order: before the induction of anesthesia, before skin incision, and before the patient leaves the operating room.

CONCLUSION

This study, based on the modified Delphi process, helped us develop ERAS and SCC consensus-driven best practice recommendations, including suggestions related to perioperative anesthesia, surgery, and nursing for SM. We hope that this study, in which we integrated both traditional Chinese and Western medical treatment protocols, can provide a basis for a rapid rehabilitation program for surgical interventions in SM.

Impact of Preoperative Counseling and Education on Decreasing Anxiety in Patients With Gynecologic Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of counseling and preoperative education on reducing anxiety in patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, patients with gynecological tumors undergoing surgical treatment between 15 and 60 days preoperatively, were included. The group was randomized to receive preoperative routine orientation plus preoperative counseling and education by nursing (experimental group [EG]) or receive preoperative routine orientation only (control group [CG]). We stratified the groups by surgical approach: open, laparoscopy, and robotic. We excluded patients treated in another service and with the need for an intensive care unit after surgery. We used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate symptoms of anxiety and depression. The severity of symptoms was evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-Br).

RESULTS

We analyzed 54 women (CG 27, EG 27). No significant differences were observed regarding ESAS scores (total, physical, emotional, well-being, and anxiety) between preoperative and postoperative evaluation. However, in the EG, comparing the preoperative versus postoperative moments, there was a significant reduction in total, emotional, and anxiety scores of ESAS (p = 0.012; p = 0.003; p = 0.001). No difference in anxiety symptoms by HADS scale was noted between the two groups, comparing preoperative and postoperative moments, CG (40.7% and 22.2%) and EG (37.0% and 25.9%) (p = 0.78; p = 0.75), respectively. Also, in depression symptoms (HADS scale), we found no difference comparing preoperative and postoperative moments (p = 0.34; p > 0.99). When we stratified by surgical approach or time between intervention and surgery ( ≤ 15, > 15 to ≤ 30, and > 30 days), no difference was observed in the anxiety and depression symptoms evaluation, in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative education by nurse orientation reduced the total, emotional, and anxiety symptoms of ESAS score between preoperative and postoperative moments. However, by the HADS scale, there was no difference in anxiety and depression symptoms.

The Power of Prehabilitation, the Reporting of Power Calculations in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Prehabilitation in Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-research Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess sample size calculation reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating prehabilitation interventions in oncological surgery patients.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was performed in multiple medical databases from inception to April 2023, including MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINHAL, AMED, and PsychINFO.

STUDY SELECTION

The inclusion criteria used were RCTs evaluating effectiveness of exercise, nutrition, and/or psychological interventions on postoperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing oncological surgery.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors (DS and SV) extracted information on the sample size calculation parameters, including type I error (α), power (1-β), mean (or mean difference between randomization arms), and variance (eg, standard deviation) for continuous outcomes, and event rates or event rate difference between randomization arms for dichotomous outcomes. When possible, we recalculated the sample size required using the collected data, given a 10% margin of error.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 59 included publications (58 RCTs), 26 (44%) reported sufficient information to complete sample size recalculation. Of those that provided sufficient information allowing us to recalculate the required sample size, 11 (42%) were within a 10% margin of the reported sample size, whereas 9 (35%) were >10% higher than reported sample size and 6 (23%) were >10% lower than reported sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Over half of the published RCTs in this field exhibit poor sample size calculation reporting. Most RCTs that report sufficient sample size information were underpowered. More stringent reporting requirements are necessary.

Descriptive Analysis of Preoperative Breast Reconstruction Patient Expectations Using the BREAST-Q Expectations Module

Background: Patient expectations have been shown to influence postoperative outcomes across surgical specialties. However, the impact of expectations in breast reconstruction is not well understood. The purpose of this project is to perform the first large-scale analysis and classification of BREAST-Q Expectations responses in patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction and completed the BREAST-Q Expectations module preoperatively between 2012 and 2021. Variables of interest included patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics. Outcomes of interest included BREAST-Q Expectations module scores. Shapiro Wilk Normality Tests demonstrated that none of the domains had a normal distribution of scores; scores were categorized by thirds to generate thresholds for optimistic, neutral, and pessimistic scores. Results: 298 patients met criteria. The mean age of the cohort was 50.3 and the mean BMI was 25.4. Half of the patients had at least one comorbidity - most commonly obesity, followed by diabetes. About two-thirds had a psychiatric diagnosis. Scores on all domains were skewed overwhelmingly positive (expectations of Medical Team, Coping, Appearance, Self-feelings, and Sexuality) or overwhelmingly negative (expectations of Pain and Recovery), which informed score categorization and interpretation. Conclusions: Preoperative expectations in patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction skew overwhelmingly optimistic for most domains, but overwhelmingly pessimistic on expectations of Pain and Recovery. These results emphasize a need for improved preoperative patient education and counseling as well as a closer analysis of the relationship between preoperative expectations and postoperative outcomes and quality of life.

Effectiveness of the addition of visual aids to conversational preoperative education in glaucoma filtering surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative visual aids on anxiety and pain management in patients with low educational backgrounds undergoing glaucoma filtering surgery.

Methods

A randomized, single-blinded, single-center clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary eye hospital in Shantou, China. Patients scheduled for glaucoma filtering surgery were randomly assigned to either a conventional oral education group or a visual aids group. Anxiety levels, pain scores, blood pressure, and pulse rates were measured at multiple time points.

Findings

The visual aids group demonstrated significantly lower anxiety levels (HAMA score: 19.6 ± 1.7 vs. 27.9 ± 3.1; p < 0.001) and pain scores (VAS: F = 174.628; p < 0.001) compared to the oral education group. Additionally, systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the visual aids group (F = 6.373; p = 0.013). During the preoperative visit, patients in the oral education group asked significantly more questions (mean ± SD: 4.0 ± 1.3) compared to those in the visual aids group (mean ± SD: 0.75 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). However, their understanding of the surgery was notably lower than that of the visual aids group. The requirement for additional anesthesia due to pain was markedly higher in the oral education group, with 66.2 % (45/68) of patients needing extra anesthesia compared to only 4.6 % (3/65) in the visual aids group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the ocular positioning compliance and cooperation during the surgery were significantly lower in the oral education group compared to the visual aids group (p < 0.001).

Interpretation

The inclusion of visual aids in preoperative education significantly improves patient outcomes in glaucoma filtering surgery by reducing anxiety and pain and stabilizing physiological parameters. This approach is particularly beneficial for patients with lower educational backgrounds.

A qualitative exploration of perioperative subjective experiences of colorectal cancer patients undergoing fast-track surgery

Colorectal cancer significantly impacts patient quality of life and burdens healthcare systems globally. Fast-track surgery (FTS) aims to alleviate some of these impacts by expediting recovery and reduce the physiological stress associated with traditional surgical approaches. Despite the clinical efficiency of FTS, there exists a gap in the literature concerning patients' subjective experiences during the perioperative period. This study seeks to fill that gap by qualitatively exploring the perioperative experiences of patients undergoing FTS for colorectal cancer, focusing on their emotional, psychological, and informational journeys. We purposively sampled 12 colorectal cancer patients. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to uncover the emotional and psychological nuances of the patients' experiences. Findings revealed that patients often felt under-informed and overwhelmed, impacting their psychological preparedness and satisfaction with the surgery. Despite FTS' clinical benefits, patients reported mixed emotions post-surgery, including relief and ongoing anxiety about cancer recurrence. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced patient-centered care practices, suggesting that healthcare providers should integrate more effective preoperative education and support systems to better align clinical efficiency with patient satisfaction.

Impact of structured checklist-based preoperative counseling versus standard counseling on postoperative patient-reported outcomes after elective surgery

INTRODUCTION

Surgery, even on an elective-basis, often induces significant stress in patients, characterized by preoperative anxiety and heightened stress levels due to anticipation of the unknown. However, the primary objective of preoperative counseling is to mitigate these concerns, particularly when delivered in a structured and comprehensive manner. While previous research has highlighted the beneficial impact of preoperative counseling on patient-reported outcomes, none have specifically explored the implementation of a structured checklist-based approach during counseling sessions. To bridge this gap in the literature, our study aims to investigate the effects of implementing a checklist-based structured counseling approach on patient-reported outcomes following elective surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study conducted over one year from January to December 2023, a total of 600 patients undergoing elective surgery across three specialties-orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and urology-were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: an intervention group consisting of 300 patients and a control group with an equal number of patients. The study evaluated three key outcomes-postoperative pain, anxiety, and satisfaction-at three specific time points following surgery: 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h.

RESULTS

Patients receiving structured checklist counseling showed significantly lower pain scores (24 h: 6.6 vs. 7.03, p = 0.041; 48 h: 5.62 vs. 6.55, p = 0.029; 72 h: 2.54 vs. 2.90, p = 0.035) and anxiety scores (24 h: 8.58 vs. 9.25, p = 0.039; 48 h: 7.50 vs. 8.45, p = 0.030; 72 h: 4.53 vs. 5.98, p = 0.031), as well as higher satisfaction scores (24 h: 5.99 vs. 5.06, p = 0.043; 48 h: 6.99 vs. 6.02, p = 0.033; 72 h: 9.10 vs. 8.20, p = 0.039) compared to controls. These improvements were consistently significant across all three surgical specialties studied (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The structured checklist-based counseling method proves to be effective and essential. This method is associated with reduced postoperative pain and anxiety levels, along with increased patient satisfaction, when compared to the standard approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective non-randomized study, Level II.

Effectiveness of Prehabilitation Modalities on Postoperative Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing curative colorectal cancer surgery is high. Prehabilitation has been suggested to reduce postoperative morbidity, however its effectiveness is still lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of prehabilitation in reducing postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search was conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Medline, PsychINFO, AMED, and Embase databases from inception to April 2023. Randomised controlled trials testing the effectiveness of prehabilitation, including exercise, nutrition, and/or psychological interventions, compared with usual care in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were included. Two independent review authors extracted relevant information and assessed the risk of bias. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to pool outcomes, and the quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 23 trials were identified (N = 2475 patients), including multimodal (3 trials), exercise (3 trials), nutrition (16 trials), and psychological (1 trial) prehabilitation. There was moderate-quality evidence that preoperative nutrition significantly reduced postoperative infectious complications (relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.94) and low-quality evidence on reducing the length of hospital stay (mean difference 0.87, 95% CI 0.17-1.58) compared with control. A single trial demonstrated an effect of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

Nutrition prehabilitation was effective in reducing infectious complications and length of hospital stay. Whether other multimodal, exercise, and psychological prehabilitation modalities improve postoperative outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery is uncertain as the current quality of evidence is low.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VW72N ).

The Effectiveness of Patient Education on Laparoscopic Surgery Postoperative Outcomes to Determine Whether Direct Coaching Is the Best Approach: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

As of 2022, patient adherence to postoperative guidelines can reduce the risk of complications by up to 52.4% following laparoscopic abdominal surgery. With the availability of various preoperative education interventions (POEIs), understanding which POEI results in improvement in patient outcomes across the procedures is imperative.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine which POEI could be the most effective on patient outcomes by systematically reviewing all the POEIs reported in the literature.

METHODS

In total, 4753 articles investigating various POEIs (eg, videos, presentations, mobile apps, and one-on-one education or coaching) were collected from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery, randomized controlled trials, and studies that provided postoperative outcomes. Exclusion criteria included studies not published in English and with no outcomes reported. Title and abstract and full-text articles with POEI randomized controlled studies were screened based on the above criteria through a blinded, dual review using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation). Study quality was assessed through the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The included articles were analyzed for educational content, intervention timing, intervention type, and postoperative outcomes appropriate for a particular surgery.

RESULTS

Only 17 studies matched our criteria, with 1831 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bariatric surgery (gastric bypass and gastric sleeve), and colectomy. In total, 15 studies reported a statistically significant improvement in at least 1 patient postoperative outcome. None of these studies were found to have an overall high risk of bias according to Cochrane standards. In total, 41% (7/17) of the included studies using direct individual education improved outcomes in almost all surgery types, while educational videos had the greatest statistically significant impact for anxiety, nausea, and pain postoperatively (P<.01). Direct group education demonstrated significant improvement in weight, BMI, exercise, and depressive symptoms in 33% (2/6) of the laparoscopic gastric bypass studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct education (individual or group based) positively impacts postoperative laparoscopic surgery outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023438698; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=438698.

Systematic review and narrative description of the outcomes of group preoperative education before elective major surgery

Background

Group preoperative education is becoming standard care for patients preparing for surgery, alongside optimisation of exercise, diet, and wellbeing. Although patient education is essential, the effectiveness of group education programmes or 'surgery schools' as a means of delivery is unclear. This review examines whether attending group preoperative education improves patient outcomes.

Methods

We systematically reviewed studies of group perioperative education before major elective surgery. Observational or intervention studies with a baseline group or control arm were included. All outcomes reported were collected and, where possible, effect estimates were summarised using random effects meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty-seven studies reported on 48 different outcomes after group education. Overall, there was a 0.7 (95% confidence interval 0.27-1.13) day reduction in mean length of stay. The odds ratio for postoperative complications after abdominal surgery was 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.85; nine studies). Patient-centred outcomes were grouped into themes. Most studies reported a benefit from group education, but only postoperative physical impairment, pain, knowledge, activation, preoperative anxiety, and some elements of quality of life were statistically significant.

Conclusion

This review presents a summary of published evidence available for group preoperative education. While these data lend support for such programmes, there is a need for adequately powered prospective studies to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative education on clinical outcomes and to evaluate whether behaviour change is sustained. Furthermore, the content, timing and mode of delivery, and evaluation measures of preoperative education require standardisation.

Systematic review protocol

PROSPERO (166297).

Outcome Heterogeneity in Prehabilitation Trials-Are We Comparing Apples and Oranges?

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decade, the number of prehabilitation randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has increased significantly. Therefore, this review aimed to describe the outcomes reported in prehabilitation RCTs in patients undergoing cancer surgery.

METHODS

A search was conducted in Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to July 2021. We included RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of preoperative exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in adult oncology patients who underwent thoracic and gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The verbatim outcomes reported in each article were extracted, and each outcome was assessed to determine whether it was defined and measured using a validated tool. Verbatim outcomes were grouped into standardized outcomes and categorized into domains. The quality of outcome reporting in each identified article was assessed using the Harman tool (score range 0-6, where 0 indicated the poorest quality).

RESULTS

A total of 74 RCTs were included, from which 601 verbatim outcomes were extracted. Only 110 (18.3%) of the verbatim outcomes were defined and 270 (44.9%) were labeled as either "primary" or "secondary" outcomes. Verbatim outcomes were categorized into 119 standardized outcomes and assigned into one of five domains (patient-reported outcomes, surgical outcomes, physical/functional outcomes, disease activity, and intervention delivery). Surgical outcomes were the most common outcomes reported (n = 71 trials, 95.9%). The overall quality of the reported outcomes was poor across trials (median score: 2.0 [IQR = 0.00-3.75]).

CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation RCTs display considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting, and low outcome reporting quality. The development of standardized core outcome sets may help improve article quality and enhance the clinical utility of prehabilitation following cancer surgery.

Effect of a telephone-based perioperative nurse-led counselling programme on unmet needs, quality of life and sexual function in colorectal cancer patients: A non-randomised quasi-experimental study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of perioperative nurse-led counselling intervention on unmet needs, sexual function and quality of life in colorectal cancer patients.

METHOD

This quasi-experimental study included 82 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery (control n = 45, intervention n = 37). The telephone-based perioperative nurse-led counselling intervention, which contained implementation, follow-up, and assessment, was applied to start from pre-surgery to post-surgery 3rd month. Data were collected with the Unmet Needs of Cancer Survivors Scale, European Organisation for Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Scale-30, Colorectal-29, Female Sexual Function Index, and International Index of Erectile Function pre- and post-surgery 3rd-6th months. The control data was collected before the pandemic, and the intervention group throughout the pandemic. The Mann-Whitney-U, Wilcoxon rank test was used.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, intervention group patients reported lower unmet and total needs scores (p = 0.000); higher quality of life (p = 0.000), physical, emotional (p = 0.000), role (p = 0.001), and social functioning scores (p = 0.002); lower fatigue (p = 0.000), constipation (p = 0.034), pain (p = 0.018), nausea-vomiting (p = 0.004), and insomnia scores (p = 0.003); and higher body image, anxiety (p = 0.000) and weight scores (p = 0.003), lower urinary frequency buttock pain (p = 0.000), dysuria (p = 0.001), abdominal pain (p = 0.001), fluctuance (p = 0.000), stool frequency (p = 0.002), and faecal incontinence (p = 0.006) scores at the sixth month (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between male and female sexual function scores (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative nurse-led counselling reduced unmet needs and increased the overall quality of life by decreasing symptom levels but did not affect sexual health outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer surgery.

Interdisciplinary interventions that improve patient-reported outcomes in perioperative cancer care: A systematic review of randomized control trials

INTRODUCTION

Interdisciplinary teams are often leveraged to improve quality of cancer care in the perioperative period. We aimed to identify the team structures and processes in interdisciplinary interventions that improve perioperative patient-reported outcomes for patients with cancer.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL for randomized control trials published at any time and screened 7,195 articles. To be included in our review, studies needed to report patient-reported outcomes, have interventions that occur in the perioperative period, include surgical cancer treatment, and include at least one non physician intervention clinical team member: advanced practice providers, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and registered nurses. We narratively synthesized intervention components, specifically roles assumed by intervention clinical team members and interdisciplinary team processes, to compare interventions that improved patient-reported outcomes, based on minimal clinically important difference and statistical significance.

RESULTS

We included 34 studies with a total of 4,722 participants, of which 31 reported a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one patient-reported outcome. No included studies had an overall high risk of bias. The common clinical team member roles featured patient education regarding diagnosis, treatment, coping, and pain/symptom management as well as postoperative follow up regarding problems after surgery, resource dissemination, and care planning. Other intervention components included six or more months of continuous clinical team member contact with the patient and involvement of the patient's caregiver.

CONCLUSIONS

Future interventions might prioritize supporting clinical team members roles to include patient education, caregiver engagement, and clinical follow-up.

Effects of Psycho-education Interventions on Colorectal Cancer Patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients not only undergo physical symptoms but also psychological suffering. Psycho-education interventions have been implemented widely to improve their psychological well-being. However, the effectiveness of psycho-education is unclear. Therefore, this research evaluates the effectiveness of psycho-education interventions on CRC patient outcomes and identifies effective intervention characteristics. The researchers searched the following databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, Wan Fang Data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedicine Database, and China Academic Journals Full-Text Database. Additionally, gray literature and bibliographies of the included studies were also searched. Finally, this review included 11 randomized controlled trials and one controlled clinical trial. The results showed that psycho-education interventions exerted positive impacts on relieving anxiety and depression, improving self-efficacy and quality of life for CRC patients either immediately, post-intervention, or at least 2 months after intervention. Despite the variety of psycho-education interventions, health education, stress management, coping skills training, and social support are also essential components. Future research should include multi-center studies with sufficient sample sizes and rigorous designs.

The Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrectomy and Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols not only positively affect gastrointestinal surgery outcomes but may also increase the risk of some complications. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of ERAS on the recovery and complications following gastrointestinal surgery. Materials and Methods: Studies published before December 2022 were retrieved from the following databases, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, without limitations of language or race. The endpoints included lung infection, surgical site infection, postoperative ileus, length of hospitalization, urinary tract infection, readmission, anastomotic leakage, and C-reactive protein serum levels. Results: A total of 23 studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that there was a decrease in incidence of the lung infection (risk ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.74, P = .002) and postoperative length of hospitalization (P < .00001). However, ERAS protocol groups had higher readmission rates, nausea, and vomiting. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage, ileus, surgical site infection, and urinary tract infection between the experimental and control groups. Conclusions: ERAS protocols can reduce the risk of postoperative lung infections, shorten hospital stays, and expedite patient recovery. Furthermore, ERAS protocols are not associated with serious complications following gastrointestinal surgeries.

Framework, component, and implementation of enhanced recovery pathways

The introduction of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) has led to a considerable paradigm shift towards evidence-based, multidisciplinary perioperative care. Such pathways are now widely implemented in a variety of surgical specialties, with largely positive results. In this narrative review, we summarize the principles, components and implementation of ERPs, focusing on recent developments in the field. We also discuss ‘special cases’ in ERPs, including: surgery in frail patients; emergency procedures; and patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19).

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update

Background

This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol.

Methods

A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations.

Results

The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries.

Conclusion

A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.