The incidence of severe oral mucositis in patients undergoing different conditioning regimens in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Risk factors and prediction models for severe radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with severe radiation-induced oral mucositis (SRIOM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to establish a prediction model for SRIOM.

METHODS

A total of 262 NPC patients who underwent CRT were analyzed retrospectively, including 192 in the modeling group and 70 in the validation group. The modeling group was divided into the non-SRIOM group (n = 112) and the SRIOM group (n = 80), and the validation group was divided into the non-SRIOM group (n = 40) and the SRIOM group (n = 30) according to the presence of SRIOM. Univariate and multivariate logistic logistic analyses were performed on the clinical data and general characteristics of all patients to construct a prediction model for SRIOM in NPC patients. The practical efficacy of the prediction model was evaluated using Hosmer-Lemeshow test, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

BMI < 23.9 kg/m2, history of periodontal disease, history of alcohol consumption, history of smoking, non-use of oral mucosal protectants, and poor oral hygiene were independent risk factors for SRIOM in NPC patients. The prediction model showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.813 (95% CI 0.752-0.875). The prediction model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and clinical utility, as evidenced by both calibration and DCA curves.

CONCLUSION

The SRIOM prediction model, developed from the clinical characteristics and general information of NPC patients, is beneficial in clinical practice for identifying high-risk SRIOM and creating tailored treatment plans.

Dental health, conditioning and oral mucositis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center study

Oral mucositis (OM) is a severe adverse effect of conditioning treatments preceding allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Despite the high incidence of OM in transplant recipients, there is a lack of effective strategies for risk assessment. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for OM development and evaluate the significance of oral health prior to allo-HSCT. A retrospective analysis of 242 adult patients receiving allo-HSCT was conducted, grading OM occurrence and severity using the World Health Organization scale. Furthermore, a radiographic assessment score was introduced to measure dental damage and restoration status in patients undergoing HSCT. In this cohort, 51.24% of patients developed clinically significant OM, with a mean grade of 1.1 (±1.3 standard deviation). Additionally, OM severity correlated with the total body irradiation dose (P < 0.0001). Among the 61 patients evaluated for dental treatment before HSCT, a significantly higher proportion developed OM (93.2%; P < 0.0001). Moreover, we observed that higher pretransplant dental damage was associated with more severe OM (P = 0.039). These findings provide a rationale for a detailed pretransplant dental examination to assess OM risk in HSCT recipients.

Characteristics of oral mucositis in patients undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide: marked difference between busulfan and melphalan regimens

PURPOSE

This study was performed to examine the effects of conditioning regimens on oral mucositis in haploidentical (haplo) donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (male, 23; female, 7; 18-68 years, median, 59 years) undergoing haplo-HSCT with PTCy using one of three conditioning regimens-reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)-melphalan (Mel); RIC-Busulfan (Bu); and myeloablative conditioning (MAC)-Bu-were enrolled in this study. Data on the WHO grade of oral mucositis (day - 7 to + 20) were collected retrospectively. The incidences of ulcerative and severe mucositis (Grade 2-4 and Grade 3-4, respectively) were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

Ulcerative mucositis occurred in 0% (0/10) of patients in the RIC-Mel group, 57.1% (4/7) in the RIC-Bu group, and 100% (13/13) in the MAC-Bu group. The differences between the RIC-Mel and RIC-Bu groups and between the RIC-Bu and MAC-Bu groups were significant (all P < 0.05). Severe mucositis occurred in 57.1% (4/7) of patients in the RIC-Bu group and 100% (13/13) of patients in the MAC-Bu group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The rates of ulcerative mucositis (≥ grade 2) and of severe mucositis (≥ grade 3) were significantly higher in the MAC-Bu group than the RIC-Bu group on days 10, 13, 15, and 16 and on days 10, 14, 15, and 16, respectively (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The risk of oral mucositis in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT with PTCy is highest with the MAC-Bu conditioning regimen, followed by RIC-Bu, and lowest with RIC-Mel.

Humanized anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody replaces methotrexate as acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in haploidentical allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) significantly affects quality of life and outcomes in patients post-haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Methotrexate (MTX) is commonly used to prevent aGVHD but can lead to complications like delayed haematological recovery and oral mucositis (OM). This study investigates the efficacy of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb) as a potential MTX alternative. Participants were divided into two cohorts: a single-dose group (25 mg/day anti-CD25 mAb with MTX) and a double-dose group (50 mg/day anti-CD25 mAb without MTX). The primary end-point was the cumulative incidence (CI) of severe aGVHD by day 100. The double-dose cohort demonstrated a significantly lower CI of total aGVHD (23.53% vs. 42.11%, p = 0.009) and grade 3-4 aGVHD (7.35% vs. 18.42%, p = 0.047). After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the adjusted HR of double-dose compared with single-dose cohort for total aGVHD was 0.47 (95% CI 0.26-0.86; p = 0.015), 0.42(95% CI 0.15-1.22; p = 0.110) for grade III-IV aGVHD, 0.45 (95% CI 0.26-0.77; p = 0.004) for total cGVHD and 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.72; p = 0.004) for the moderate to severe cGVHD. Additionally, this double-dose regimen significantly reduced the incidence of oral mucositis and demonstrated lower rates of infections and haemorrhagic cystitis. These findings suggest that a double-dose anti-CD25 mAb regimen without MTX is a promising strategy for aGVHD prophylaxis in haplo-HSCT (ChiCTR2200060184).

A sex-dependent salivary bacterium influences oral mucositis severity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in curing hematologic disorders is limited by its short- and long-term toxicities. One such toxicity is oral mucositis (OM), causing pain, speech/swallowing difficulty, and prolonged hospitalization. Although conditioning chemoradiotherapy is the direct cause of OM, potential host-intrinsic mediators of mucosal injury remain elusive. We hypothesized that the oral microbiota may influence OM severity. We used a validated comprehensive scoring system based on specialized Oral Medicine examinations to longitudinally quantify OM severity in alloHCT recipients. High-throughput multi-site profiling of the oral microbiota was performed in parallel. We identify a sex-dependent commensal bacterium, Oribacterium asaccharolyticum, whose presence in saliva before transplantation is associated with more severe OM 14 days after transplantation. The sex predilection of this species correlated with higher uric acid levels in men. Our findings represent the first sex-dependent microbiota-mediated pathway in OM pathogenesis and introduce novel targets for preventative interventions.

Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: hierarchical analysis of recurrence factors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze, through a hierarchical model, the risk factors associated with the recurrence of chemo-induced oral mucositis (OM) in children and adolescents.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort with 31 individuals of both sexes, aged 1-18 years, who were undergoing chemotherapy, and presented OM lesions was conducted. Data collection included analysis of medical records, interviews, and intraoral examination. Information regarding patients' socioeconomic and demographic profile, underlying disease, antineoplastic regimen, hematological condition, and oral health status were collected. To assess the association of independent variables with the outcome, the Chi-square, Fisher's Exact, and Mann-Whitney tests were used, in addition to a binary logistic regression model, with a maximum error of 5% and a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Significant associations were observed between the history of OM and the diagnosis of the child/adolescent, neutrophil count, previous cancer treatments and the chemotherapy scheme in use (p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression revealed a 13.69 higher risk of developing OM recurrence in individuals who received high-dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy.

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic and demographic factors did not influence OM recurrence. However, clinical variables, such as neutropenia, diagnosis of leukemia, and high-dose MTX protocols increase the chance of OM new cases.

Comparing the risk of severe oral mucositis associated with methotrexate as graft-versus host-disease prophylaxis to other immunosuppressive prophylactic agents in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study examines the risk of severe oral mucositis (SOM) in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (GVHD) compared to other agents in hematopoietic cell transplantation patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of four databases, including PubMed, Embassy, Web of Science, and Scopus, was conducted to identify studies reporting frequency and severity of oral mucositis in association with GVHD prophylactic regimens. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform the meta-analysis. Risk of bias assessment was carried out using the Rob-2 tool for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-five papers, including 11 RCTs and 14 observational studies, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results from eight RCTs showed a higher risk of SOM in patients receiving MTX or MTX-inclusive GVHD prophylaxis versus non-MTX alternatives (RR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.20, 1.87], I2 = 36%, P = 0.0003). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (Pt-Cy) consistently showed lower risk of mucositis than MTX. Folinic acid (FA) rescue and mini-dosing of MTX were associated with reduced oral mucositis severity.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving MTX have a higher SOM risk compared to other approaches to prevent GVHD, which should be considered in patient care. When appropriate, MMF, FA, and a mini-dose of MTX may be an alternative that is associated with less SOM. This work also underlines the scarcity of RCTs on MTX interventions to provide the best evidence-based recommendations.

HLA-DPB1 and DPA1 ~ DPB1 linkage mismatch affects the survival of recipients receiving HLA-14/14 matched unrelated donor HSCT

To analyse the effect of HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1 allelic mismatches on the outcomes of unrelated donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (URD-HSCT), we collected 258 recipients with haematological disease who underwent HLA-10/10 matched URD-HSCT. HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1, -DRB3/4/5, -DQA1, -DPA1 and -DPB1 typing was performed for the donors and recipients using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. After excluding 8 cases with DQA1 or DRB3/4/5 mismatches, we included 250 cases with HLA-14/14 matching for further analysis. Our results showed that the proportion of matched DPA1 and DPB1 alleles was only 10.4% (26/250). The remaining 89.6% of donors and recipients demonstrated DPA1 or DPB1 mismatch. In the DPA1 matched and DPB1 mismatched group, accounting for 18.8% (47/250) of the cohort, DPB1*02:01/DPB1*03:01 allelic mismatches were associated with decreased 2-year OS and increased NRM. DPB1*02:02/DPB1*05:01 and DPB1*02:01/DPB1*05:01 mismatches showed no impact on outcomes. Moreover, the specific allelic mismatches observed were consistent with the DPB1 T-cell epitope (TCE) classification as permissive and non-permissive. We innovatively established an analysis method for DPA1 ~ DPB1 linkage mismatch for cases with both DPA1 and DPB1 mismatched, accounting for 70% (175/250) of the total. DPA1*02:02 ~ DPB1*05:01/DPA1*02:01 ~ DPB1*17:01 linkage mismatches were associated with lower 2-year OS, especially among AML/MDS recipients. DPA1*02:02 ~ DPB1*05:01/DPA1*01:03 ~ DPB1*02:01 linkage mismatches showed no impact on outcomes. In conclusion, applying the DPA1 ~ DPB1 linkage mismatch analysis approach can identify different types of mismatches affecting transplant outcomes and provide valuable insight for selecting optimal donors for AML/MDS and ALL recipients.

Nutritional aspects in autoimmune diseases undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: overview and recommendations on behalf of the EBMT ADWP and Nurses Group

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) represent a heterogeneous group of conditions affecting 5-10% of the global population. In recent decades, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), mainly autologous, has been successfully adopted to treat patients affected by severe/refractory ADs. In this context malnutrition has a detrimental impact on relapse, mortality, infection rate, engraftment, long-term survival, and prolongation of hospitalization. However, in this population, the management of nutrition should be improved since nutritional assessment is partially performed in routine clinical practice. A panel of nurses and physicians from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) reviewed all available evidence based on current literature and expert practices from centers with extensive experience in HSCT for ADs, on the nutritional management of ADs patients during HSCT procedure. In this context, adequate nutritional status predicts a better response to treatment and improves quality of life. Herein, a systematic and comprehensive monitoring of nutritional status before, during and after HSCT, with adequate nutritional support in the case of ADs patients, in addition to assessing the dietary requirements associated with HSCT has been covered. Moreover, given the singularity of each AD, the underlying disease should be considered for an appropriate approach. The management and evaluation of nutritional status must be carried out by a multidisciplinary team to assess the needs, monitor the effectiveness of each intervention, and prevent complications, especially in complex situations as patients affected by ADs.

A randomised trial of topical polaprezinc to prevent oral mucositis in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ToPaZ study)

PURPOSE

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Polaprezinc, an anti-ulcer drug, has been shown to be effective to prevent OM in several studies when administered topically and systemically. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical polaprezinc in patients undergoing HSCT.

METHODS

This was an open-label randomised clinical trial comparing polaprezinc and sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes for the prevention of severe OM in HSCT patients. Adult patients who received conditioning regimens at moderate to high risk of developing OM were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe (WHO grades 3-4) OM. The secondary endpoints included duration of grades 3-4 OM, incidence and duration of grades 2-4 OM, patient-reported pain and functional limitations.

RESULTS

In total, 108 patients (55 test arm and 53 control arm) were randomised. There was no difference in the incidence of grades 3 to 4 OM (35% test arm versus 36% control arm). The secondary endpoints were not significantly different. In both arms, patients reported more throat pain compared to mouth pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical polaprezinc had no effect in the prevention of OM in HSCT patients. Further research is required to evaluate the effects of systemic polaprezinc. The OM assessment tool needs to be reviewed as throat mucositis was a main issue in this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12320001188921 (Date Registered: 10th November 2020).

Proposal of a prophylactic photobiomodulation protocol for chemotherapy-induced oral and oropharyngeal mucositis: a randomized clinical trial

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is widely used in oncology settings, but lack of assessment standardization is the main barrier to optimization of clinical protocols. This study analyzed three PBMT protocols for preventing oral and oropharyngeal mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing chemotherapy (CT) and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This is a preliminary randomized blind clinical trial. Group 1 received intraoral prophylactic PBMT, Group 2 received intraoral and oropharyngeal PBMT, and Group 3 received intraoral, oropharyngeal, and extraoral PBMT. The applications were from the first day of CT to day + 10. Clinicodemographic data, CT regimens, types of HSCT, hematological exams, occurrence/severity of OM, odynophagia, and OM-related opportunistic infections were assessed. Sixty participants (age range: 18-74 years) were included; 70% of them underwent CT and 30% HSCT. About 43.3% of patients had OM, while odynophagia was reported by 23.3%. Both Groups 1 and 2 revealed better results. Multivariate analysis showed that HSCT directly influenced the occurrence of OM. Individuals who had undergone allogeneic HSCT were 1.93 times more likely to develop OM (p < 0.001). Group 3 exhibited a higher frequency of OM, albeit of lower grades. This group consisted of half the population who had undergone HSCT, had the highest percentage of melphalan use, and had the lowest mean leukocyte count. The three proposed protocols were effective in preventing and reducing OM, with good tolerance and no reported adverse effects. PBMT is a safe and effective approach to OM prophylaxis in adults undergoing CT/HSCT.

Application of big data analyses to compare the impact of oral and gastrointestinal mucositis on risks and outcomes of febrile neutropenia and septicemia among patients hospitalized for the treatment of leukemia or multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

Oral ulcerative mucositis (UM) and gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) have been associated with increased likelihood of systemic infection (bacteremia and sepsis) in patients being treated for hematological malignancies. To better define and contrast differences between UM and GIM, we utilized the United States 2017 National Inpatient Sample and analyzed patients hospitalized for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) or leukemia.

METHODS

We utilized generalized linear models to assess the association between adverse events-UM and GIM-among hospitalized MM or leukemia patients and the outcome of febrile neutropenia (FN), septicemia, burden of illness, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 71,780 hospitalized leukemia patients, 1255 had UM and 100 GIM. Of 113,915 MM patients, 1065 manifested UM and 230 had GIM. In an adjusted analysis, UM was significantly associated with increased risk of FN in both the leukemia (aOR = 2.87, 95% CI = 2.09-3.92) and MM cohorts (aOR = 4.96, 95% CI = 3.22-7.66). Contrastingly, UM had no effect on the risk of septicemia in either group. Likewise, GIM significantly increased the odds of FN in both leukemia (aOR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.35-5.88) and MM (aOR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.51-9.31) patients. Similar findings were noted when we restricted our analysis to recipients of high-dose condition regimens in preparation for hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. UM and GIM were consistently associated with higher burden of illness in all the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This first use of big data provided an effective platform to assess the risks, outcomes, and cost of care of cancer treatment-related toxicities in patients hospitalized for the management of hematologic malignancies.