Feasibility, acceptability, and utility of a nurse-led survivorship program for people with metastatic melanoma (MELCARE)

Survivorship Care for People Affected by Advanced or Metastatic Cancer: Building on the Recent Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer-ASCO Standards and Practice Recommendations

Although there is a growing number of people living with advanced or metastatic cancer, primarily because of more effective treatment regimens, there are limited estimates of the actual number of people living with advanced or metastatic cancer. Many people will have treatable but not curable cancers, may have survival measured in years, and may have periods on and off therapy. People with advanced or metastatic disease, as well as their families and caregivers, may experience significant unmet needs, overlapping yet distinct to those with potentially curable cancer. Recently, the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and ASCO developed standards and practice recommendations relevant to the delivery of quality survivorship care for people living with advanced or metastatic cancer. The recommendations included seven domains: (1) person-centered care; (2) coordinated and integrated care; (3) evidence-based and comprehensive care; (4) evaluated and communicated care; (5) accessible and equitable care; (6) sustainable and resourced care; and (7) research and data-driven care. Immediate priorities to improve clinical care include focusing on (1) discussions regarding prognosis and goals of care; (2) routinely assessing physical, psychological, and social unmet needs with referral to appropriate supportive care services; and (3) creating blended models of care, incorporating elements of palliative care and survivorship services. Additional areas for focus include (1) advocacy and policy; (2) system design and health care delivery; (3) defining, measuring, and managing quality; (4) addressing inequity; and (5) research specifically focused on these cancer populations.

Exploring Motives Behind Ideal Melanoma Survivorship Care Plans With Multiple Stakeholders: A Cocreation Study

BACKGROUND

Survivorship care plans (SCPs), ie, personalized health care plans for cancer survivors, can be used to support the growing group of melanoma survivors throughout their disease trajectory. However, implementation and effectiveness of SCPs are suboptimal and could benefit from the involvement of stakeholders in developing a user-centered design.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the ideal SCP for patients with melanoma in terms of functions and features to be included according to different stakeholders and to explore their underlying motives.

METHODS

In total, 3 cocreation sessions were organized with mixed samples of stakeholders, ie, patients with (a history of) melanoma (n=4), health care providers (HCPs) active in melanoma care (n=3), and IT specialists active in hospital IT departments (n=6). They were invited to compose their ideal melanoma SCP based on potential functions and features identified from prior qualitative research. These functions and features belonged to one of the four main categories of survivorship care (SSC): (1) information and education, (2) identification and treatment, (3) oncological follow-up, and (4) coordination. Participants were invited to explain their motives for including functions and features. Ideas were shared between stakeholders, and interaction was promoted. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the ideal SCP per stakeholder group. To analyze underlying motives, all cocreation sessions were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in a thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

With regard to their ideal SCPs, all stakeholders added functions from all 4 SSC categories. Patients assembled a rather compact SCP with category 2 on identification and treatment being most important. Both HCPs and IT professionals constructed a somewhat larger SCP, with category 3 on oncological follow-up being the most important aspect and HCPs also focusing on category 4 on coordination. As for the motives behind their ideal SCP compositions, patients predominantly added functions based on their personal experiences or experiences from fellow patients, whereas both HCPS and IT professionals based their compositions primarily on their respective areas of expertise: HCPs related their additions to their roles as medical practitioners; for example, in providing a complete treatment plan and obtaining informed consent, while IT professionals' contributions were mainly influenced by feasibility and privacy concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

This cocreation study provides insights into stakeholders' ideal melanoma SCP and the motivations behind them. Considering the diversity in both the preferences and underlying motives regarding SCP composition between patients, HCPs, and IT specialists, it is crucial to develop a broad SCP that extends beyond traditional SCP content, emphasizing personalization. In addition to continued stakeholder involvement, efforts should be focused on addressing potential feasibility and privacy issues to ensure the SCP meets both patients' and HCPs' needs.

Living well with advanced cancer: a scoping review of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions

PURPOSE

The increasing number of people living longer with advanced cancer presents unique physical, psychosocial, financial, legal, practical and complex care needs. Supportive care interventions aim to address these needs by improving symptom management, promoting wellbeing, enhancing quality of life and potentially improving prognosis. To integrate supportive care interventions into clinical practice, a comprehensive review of existing studies is needed. This scoping review maps the evidence on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for people with advanced cancer and identifies gaps to inform future research.

METHODS

We systematically searched four electronic databases-CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane and PsycINFO-for peer-reviewed original research on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for adults with advanced cancer, published from January 1, 2013, to July 1, 2024.

RESULTS

Out of 3716 studies, 84 publications met the inclusion criteria. These studies were categorised into key supportive care domains: physical activity, psychosocial support, patient care and autonomy, multimodal approaches and others. Most publications focused on interventions addressing physical and psychosocial needs, showing benefits such as reduced fatigue, pain and improved mood. However, significant gaps were found in research on interventions addressing practical needs essential to autonomy, including health system and information needs, patient care and support and financial needs.

CONCLUSION

Mapping the studies to the needs of the advanced cancer population showed that domains with greatest unmet needs have the fewest interventions available. Our scoping review suggests that non-pharmacological supportive care interventions can improve the wellbeing and quality of life of people living with advanced cancer. However, addressing methodological limitations requires further large-scale, multi-centre studies focusing on the identified gaps to inform the implementation of suitable supportive care programs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Non-pharmacological interventions can boost wellbeing and quality of life for advanced cancer survivors, but addressing gaps in practical and systemic support is crucial.

Nurse-led renal cell carcinoma clinic: a single center review

BACKGROUND

In 2015 our centre introduced a nurse-led renal cell cancer follow-up protocol and clinic for patients who have undergone partial or radical nephrectomy for organ-confined kidney tumours. The main aims of this clinic were to improve healthcare efficiency and standardize follow-up processes.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of a nurse-led renal cell cancer follow up clinic in regard to surveillance protocol compliance and the timely identification and appropriate management of recurrences. A secondary objective was to evaluate this locally developed follow up protocol against the current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines surveillance protocol.

PATIENT AND METHODS

All patients who underwent a partial or radical nephrectomy between 2015 and 2021 at a single Western Australia institution for a primary renal malignancy were included. Data was collected from local clinical information systems and protocol adherence, recurrence characteristics and management were assessed. The current EAU guidelines were applied to the cohort to assess differences in risk-stratification and theoretical outcomes between the protocols.

RESULTS

After a mean follow up period of 31.2 months (range 0-77 months), 75.5% (185/245) of patients had all follow up imaging and reviews within 1 month of the timeframe scheduled on the protocol. 17.1% (42/245) had a delay in their follow up of more than a month at some stage, 5.7% (14/245) did not attend for follow up but had documented attempts to facilitate their compliance, and 0.4% (1/245) were lost to follow up with no evidence of attempted contact. 15.5% (38/245) of patients had recurrence of malignancy detected during follow up and these were all discussed in a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting. The recurrence rate was 2.5% (3/119) for low risk, 17.7% (14/79) for intermediate risk, and 44.7% (21/47) for high risk patients when they were re-stratified according to EAU risk categories. No recurrences were detected through ultrasound (USS) or chest x-ray (CXR) in this cohort and our protocol tended to place patients in higher risk-stratification groups as compared to current EAU guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-led renal cell cancer follow up is a safe, reliable and effective clinical framework that has significant benefits in regard to resource utilization. USS and CXR are ineffective in detecting recurrence and Computerized tomography (CT) should be considered the imaging modality of choice for this purpose. The EAU surveillance protocol appears superior to our protocol, and we have therefore transitioned to the EAU guideline protocol going forward.

Models of Care in Providing Comprehensive Healthcare on Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review with a TIDieR Checklist Analysis

BACKGROUND

The study's aim is to identify the models of care used to provide survivorship care plans (SCPs) to cancer survivors in healthcare services, describing what kind of professionals are involved, in which settings and timings, and their feasibility.

METHODS

The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews is followed. Studies that considered the SCPs applying different models of care, in any healthcare setting on any adult cancer survivors who completed oncological treatments, have been included. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Cinahal were searched from 2013 to 2023 with these keywords: "Survivorship Care Plan", "Oncology", and "Program". The study selection process was reported with the PRISMA-ScR. A total of 325 records were identified, 42 were screened, and, ultimately, 23 articles were included.

RESULTS

The models of care include: SCP standardization in hospitals; self-support oriented; consultation-based; primary or specialist direct referral; shared care; a multimodal approach. Multidisciplinary teams were involved in the SCP models of care. The settings were private clinics or cancer centers. One-hour SCP interventions were most frequently delivered through in-person visits, by telephone, or online.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing SCPs is feasible in healthcare contexts, but with challenges, like time and resource management. Patient-centered programs promoting coordinated care are promising models of care.

Supportive care needs in Australian melanoma patients and caregivers: results from a quantitative cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the supportive care needs of Australian melanoma patients and their caregivers to form the basis for improving services.

METHODS

General and melanoma-related supportive care needs in melanoma patients were measured using the SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-M12 respectively, whereas caregivers completed the SCNS-P&C. Patients also completed the MCQ-28 and FCRI-9, with all participants completing the QLQ-C30, DASS-21, and questions measuring utilisation and preference for supportive health services. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with unmet needs in melanoma patients.

RESULTS

A total of 56 early-stage patients, 100 advanced-stage patients, and 37 caregivers participated. At least three-quarters ([Formula: see text] 75%) of each participant group reported at least one unmet need. Of the ten most reported unmet needs in each participant group, at least six ([Formula: see text] 60%) were related to psychological and emotional well-being, with access to a psychologist the most desired service (> 25%). Fear of cancer recurrence was equally prevalent in both patient groups at a level indicative of need for intervention. Advanced-stage patients reported significantly (p < 0.05) more unmet psychological, physical and daily living, and sexuality needs, and significantly (p < 0.05) worse functioning than early-stage patients.

CONCLUSION

Australian melanoma patients and caregivers report substantial unmet supportive care needs, particularly regarding their psychological and emotional well-being. Psychological and emotional well-being services, such as access to a clinical psychologist or implementation of patient-reported outcome measures, should be incorporated into routine melanoma care to address unmet patient and caregiver needs and improve well-being.

Implementing a PROACTive Care Pathway to Empower and Support Survivors of Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Optimal comprehensive survivorship care is insufficiently delivered. To increase patient empowerment and maximize the uptake of multidisciplinary supportive care strategies to serve all survivorship needs, we implemented a proactive survivorship care pathway for patients with early breast cancer at the end of primary treatment phase.

METHODS

Pathway components included (1) a personalized survivorship care plan (SCP), (2) face-to-face survivorship education seminars and personalized consultation for supportive care referrals (Transition Day), (3) a mobile app delivering personalized education and self-management advice, and (4) decision aids for physicians focused on supportive care needs. A mixed-methods process evaluation was performed according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework including administrative data review, pathway experience survey (patient, physician, and organization), and focus group. The primary objective was patient-perceived satisfaction with the pathway (predefined progression criteria for pathway continuation ≥70%).

RESULTS

Over 6 months, 321 patients were eligible for the pathway and received a SCP and 98 (30%) attended the Transition Day. Among 126 patients surveyed, 77 (66.1%) responded. 70.1% received the SCP, 51.9% attended the Transition Day, and 59.7% accessed the mobile app. 96.1% of patients were very or completely satisfied with the overall pathway, whereas perceived usefulness was 64.8% for the SCP, 90% for the Transition Day, and 65.2% for the mobile app. Pathway implementation seemed to be positively experienced by physicians and the organization.

CONCLUSION

Patients were satisfied with a proactive survivorship care pathway, and the majority reported that its components were useful in supporting their needs. This study can inform the implementation of survivorship care pathways in other centers.