Type of gastrointestinal reconstruction affects postoperative recovery after pancreatic head resection

Effect of Billroth-II versus Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastrojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy on delayed gastric emptying: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of Billroth-II(B-II) versus Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction for gastrojejunostomy on DGE after PD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the electronic database MEDLINE (via PubMed and OVID), EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) of the Cochrane Library to select pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic from January 1990 to January 2020. The primary outcome was identified as postoperative DGE. Subgroup analysis was established to compare the incidence of grade B and C DGE. Software Revman 5.3 was used for the statistical analysis, summary statistics were calculated using fixed effect model or random effect model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs including a total of 612 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. The incidence of grade B and C DGE was significantly lower with the B-II reconstruction than with the R-Y reconstruction (8.0% vs. 14.8%, OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.95, P = 0.03) and the B-II reconstruction took a shorter operation time (WMD=-7.18, 95% CI: [-13.09, -1.27], P = 0,02). No statistically significant difference was found between the two reconstruction methods in terms of the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), bile leak, intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative pneumonia and the length of postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

B-II reconstruction after PD has a lower incidence of grade B and C DGE and shorter operation time compared with R-Y reconstruction.

Effect of Billroth II or Roux-en-Y Reconstruction for the Gastrojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare Billroth II with Roux-en-Y reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

A literature search was carried out to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing postoperative complications of Billroth II versus Roux-en-Y reconstruction following PD published from 1 January 1990 to 31 August 2014. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed effects or random effects models

RESULTS

In total, three RCTs with 470 patients were included. Using International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions, incidences of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) [grades B and C (3.9 versus 12.9 %; RR 0.30, 95 % CI 0.11-0.79; P = 0.01), DGE grade C (0.7 versus 9.6 %; RR 0.11, 95 % CI 0.02-0.61; P = 0.01)] were significantly lower in the Billroth II group than in the Roux-en-Y group, as was the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference -4.72, 95 % CI -8.91, -0.53; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of DGE (grades B and C) after PD can be decreased by using Billroth II rather than Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Effect of billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the gastrojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), occurring in 14% to 61% of cases. There have been no studies that compare the incidence of DGE in terms of the reconstruction method of gastrojejunostomy performed in subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the superiority of Billroth II (B-II) to Roux-en Y (R-Y) reconstruction on decreasing the incidence of delayed gastric emptying DGE after SSPPD by a prospective randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Between April 2008 and August 2011, 101 patients who underwent SSPPD for pancreatic head or periampullary diseases were randomly allocated to B-II reconstruction (n = 52) and R-Y reconstruction (n = 49) groups. The primary endpoint was incidence of DGE.

RESULTS

DGE occurred in 5.7% of patients in the B-II group and in 20.4% of patients in the R-Y group (P = 0.028). Patients in the B-II group had a significantly shorter hospital stay after operation than patients in the R-Y group (31.6 ± 15.0 days vs. 41.4 ± 20.5 days, P = 0.037). In terms of postoperative complications, the incidence of pancreatic fistula was significantly higher in patients with DGE (38.5%) than in patients without DGE (14.8%) (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that the incidence of DGE after SSPPD can be decreased by using B-II rather than R-Y reconstruction for gastrojejunostomy.(Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN-CTR: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/, ref no. UMIN000003535).

Different incretin responses after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy

OBJECTIVES

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are known as incretins to stimulate insulin secretion. The aims of this study were to investigate the postoperative β-cell function and hormonal responses of GLP-1 and GIP after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP).

METHODS

Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed in 34 patients (20 PD and 14 DP) before and 1 month after operation. The changes in the serum glucose and insulin concentrations, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and pancreatic β-cell function (BCF) were analyzed. GLP-1 and GIP were also measured.

RESULTS

There was no patient with postoperative deterioration of glucose tolerance after PD, whereas impairment of glucose metabolism was observed after DP. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance decreased after PD, whereas those after DP showed no change. The postoperative BCF were lower than preoperative values in both groups. GLP-1 increased after DP but not after PD, whereas GIP decreased after PD but not after DP.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in glucose metabolism and incretin responses were different between PD and DP. The increased level of GLP-1 after DP might reflect the relatively insufficient BCF; and thus, perioperative administration of GLP-1 might improve the diabetic condition after DP.

Controversies and appraisals about gastrointestinal reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy

Gastrointestinal reconstruction has been considered to be closely related to postoperative morbidity, mortality and quality of life of the patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). For more than half a century, the scholars all around the world have offered numerous operative modifications and new procedures to improve the alimentary reconstruction for PD, but the effect and appraisal of these methods have always been controversial. In recent years many large prospective randomized controlled trials have been reported and the questions above have been re-studied based on the meta-analysis, which enables us to have a correct understanding about these questions for the first time. This article summarized newest research findings, and carried out the synthesis contrast analysis of the main methods of digestive canal reconstruction for PD such as pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) versus pancreaticogastrostomy (PG), the child type or Roux-en-Y technique, pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) and the classic Whipple procedure (WPD), duct-to- mucosa anastomosis versus end-to-end invaginated PD, etc. The objective effects of these commonly clinically used procedures are discussed in this paper.

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

BACKGROUND

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreatic resection. In the literature, the reported incidence of DGE after pancreatic surgery varies considerably between different surgical centers, primarily because an internationally accepted consensus definition of DGE is not available. Several surgical centers use a different definition of DGE. Hence, a valid comparison of different study reports and operative techniques is not possible.

METHODS

After a literature review on DGE after pancreatic resection, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) developed an objective and generally applicable definition with grades of DGE based primarily on severity and clinical impact.

RESULTS

DGE represents the inability to return to a standard diet by the end of the first postoperative week and includes prolonged nasogastric intubation of the patient. Three different grades (A, B, and C) were defined based on the impact on the clinical course and on postoperative management.

CONCLUSION

The proposed definition, which includes a clinical grading of DGE, should allow objective and accurate comparison of the results of future clinical trials and will facilitate the objective evaluation of novel interventions and surgical modalities in the field of pancreatic surgery.