A Japanese case of eosinophilic esophagitis

Assessment of Esophageal Motility in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Scoping Review

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated condition causing esophageal symptoms, particularly dysphagia. Despite the important progress in the treatment of EoE, a significant proportion of patients continue to report symptoms that negatively impact quality of life. Esophageal manometry is used to assess motility and function, but is not routinely used in EoE. We aimed to systematically review and describe current literature evaluating esophageal manometry in EoE. Forty-eight studies meeting the criteria were identified, describing 802 patients. Using standard water swallow protocols, the proportion of abnormalities detected was not dissimilar to other populations, apart from disorders of esophago-gastric outflow, which were found in 5%. Twelve studies described pretreatment and posttreatment manometry, with motility normalization after pharmacological therapy reported in 20%. Early, brief panesophageal pressurization was described in a number of studies and was more prevalent in the few studies utilizing additional provocation testing. Reports in the literature regarding temporal relationships between manometric findings and symptoms are variable. Esophageal manometry may be capable of detecting clinically relevant changes to esophageal function in EoE. Possible mechanisms are altered neuromuscular function because of secretory products of EoE and/or fibroinflammatory processes, manifesting as pressurization because of altered esophageal compliance. Some changes may be reversible with therapy. Drawing strong conclusions from the literature is difficult, with bias toward case reports and retrospective observation. Adaptations to assessment protocols to include provocation testing may provide more robust evaluation and detect clinically relevant, subtle changes in esophageal function, earlier within the patient pathway.

Clinicopathological Differences between Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Asymptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia

Objective According to consensus guidelines, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined as a clinicopathological entity whose symptoms and histology must always be considered together. However, endoscopic findings typical of EoE are often seen in asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE). We aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features of aEE. Methods We retrospectively compared cases of aEE and those of symptomatic EoE. Materials We reviewed 146 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and were confirmed histopathologically to have esophageal eosinophil infiltration of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field. They were divided into the aEE group (n=75) and the EoE group (n=71). Patients' clinicopathological findings were then collected and examined. Results The EoE group experienced dysphagia (47.9%), heartburn (40.8%), food impaction (40.8%), chest pain (16.9%), and other symptoms (8.5%). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, sex, current smoking status, or alcohol consumption. The aEE group had a significantly higher body mass index (p<0.01) and significantly lower frequency of concurrent allergic diseases (p<0.01) than the EoE group. No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to the mean peripheral blood eosinophil count, non-specific immunoglobulin E concentration, peak eosinophil infiltration in the biopsy specimens, EoE histology scoring system, phenotype and location of typical endoscopic findings of EoE, or thickness of the esophagus wall or the mucosal and submucosal layer as measured by endoscopic ultrasonography. Two patients in the aEE group who were followed up without treatment subsequently developed esophageal symptoms. Conclusion aEE and EoE may have the same clinicopathological features.

Similarity and difference in the characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis between Western countries and Japan

Over the past two decades, the incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have risen rapidly, especially in Western countries, with cases in Japan also showing a gradual increase in recent years. However, similarities and differences regarding the characteristics of EoE between Western countries and Japan remain to be clearly elucidated. The current clinical guidelines for diagnosis include symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and dense eosinophilic infiltration in the esophageal epithelium. Most affected patients in Japan are diagnosed incidentally during a medical health check-up and asymptomatic cases with typical endoscopic findings suggestive of EoE are frequently encountered. Clinical characteristics of EoE in Japanese are similar to those seen in Western populations. The predominant symptom is dysphagia, with food impaction extremely rare in Japanese cases. Linear furrows are the most frequently reported characteristic endoscopic finding, while an esophageal stricture or narrow caliber is rarely observed. Treatment strategies for EoE include drugs, dietary restrictions, and endoscopic dilation when the disease is advanced with stricture formation. Although single therapy using a proton-pump inhibitor has been shown to achieve symptomatic and histological response in the majority of patients in Japan, no prospective randomized control studies that evaluated drug or elimination diet therapy have been presented. Overall, EoE has similar clinical characteristics between Japanese and Western populations, while disease severity seems to be milder in Japan. Additional studies are necessary to determine genetic factors, natural history of the disease, and treatment efficacy of drugs and elimination diet as compared to Western populations.

The "caterpillar sign": a novel endoscopic indicator of eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Although several endoscopic findings of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), such as the EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS), have been reported thus far, these endoscopic findings exhibit low specificity. Furthermore, most of these endoscopic findings were evaluated solely in patients from Western nations. We have recently noted a fragile, protruded mucosal lesion sandwiched between longitudinal furrows (similar to caterpillar tracks) on the esophagus in patients with EoE. We have termed this novel finding the "caterpillar sign". This study evaluated the clinical significance of the caterpillar sign and the EREFS for diagnosis of EoE in Japanese patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic images from 165 consecutive patients who underwent tissue collection on suspicion of EoE. We compared the clinical significance between the EREFS and the caterpillar sign. We defined EoE as the presence of ≥ 15 eosinophils on esophageal mucosa per high-power field; control images had < 15 eosinophils per high-power field. For evaluation of endoscopic diagnosis capacity using the total EREFS, 2 points was set as the cutoff value. The presence or absence of the caterpillar sign was evaluated.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of total EREFS ≥ 2 for the diagnosis of EoE were 100%, 56.2%, 56.6%, and 100%; for the caterpillar sign, those values were 83.3%, 98.1%, 96.2%, and 91.2%, respectively. Interobserver agreement for identification of the caterpillar sign was substantial (κ = 0.80) CONCLUSIONS: The caterpillar sign could be a novel reliable indicator for endoscopic diagnosis of EoE.

Clinical Features of Esophageal Eosinophilia According to Endoscopic Phenotypes

Objective Esophageal eosinophilia (EE), a histological hallmark of eosinophilic esophagitis, is classified into two endoscopic phenotypes: localized and diffuse EE. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of EE localized in the lower esophagus and to describe its clinical features in comparison with diffuse EE. Methods Data from 81 consecutive patients with EE were retrospectively investigated. EE was histologically defined as ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field. Based on the endoscopic appearance with a histological assessment, EE was classified as either diffuse or localized type. We compared the clinical features, including the medical treatment and natural course, between the two types. Results Of the 81 patients, 52 (64.2%) had diffuse EE, and 29 (35.8%) had localized EE. Among men patients, localized EE was significantly more common than diffuse EE. In localized EE, dysphagia and food impaction were less prevalent, and the presence of rings was significantly less common than in diffuse EE. Acid-suppressive therapy was administered to only 3 of the 29 patients with localized EE. In asymptomatic patients, especially those with localized EE, endoscopic abnormalities did not worsen but rather improved in some findings, such as with regard to furrows or exudate, during the natural course of three years without medical treatment. Conclusion Localized EE has a strong predilection for men patients and accounted for more than one third of all cases of EE. This condition appears to be less symptomatic and necessitates milder medical treatment than diffuse EE and might not worsen progressively.

Symptom-based diagnostic approach for eosinophilic esophagitis

The prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been increasing in Japan. Although the diagnosis of EoE is based on simple criteria that include the presence of esophageal symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia on biopsies, there are several important issues associated with the diagnostic approach. Following an extensive literature search, the symptoms of 886 EoE cases in Japanese adults were analyzed and divided into three categories as follows: (1) typical symptoms, such as dysphagia (53%); (2) other upper GI symptoms (40%); and (3) no symptoms found during screening or medical examination, i.e., "asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia" (19%). The diagnostic approach was reviewed according to these categories as well as according to the presence or absence of esophageal eosinophilia. The present manuscript describes the current therapeutic strategy of EoE and ultimately proposes a symptom-based diagnostic approach for EoE.

Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan: a case-control study

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergy-associated clinicopathologic condition gaining an increasing amount of recognition in various areas of the world. While the clinical definition and characteristics may differ depending on country and region, sufficient studies have not yet been performed in Japan.

Objective

To assess the prevalence of EoE among the Japanese population and the clinical features associated with the disease.

Methods

Endoscopic data from January 2012 to October 2018 was gathered from 9 Japanese clinical institutes. EoE, defined as esophageal mucosal eosinophilia of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field, was determined based on esophageal biopsies. Clinical and endoscopic patterns in the cases with EoE were investigated and compared with 186 age- and sex-matched controls.

Results

From 130,013 upper endoscopic examinations, 66 cases of EoE were identified (0.051%; mean age, 45.2 years [range, 7-79 years]; 45 males). Twenty-five patients (37.9%) with EoE were diagnosed by endoscopy during a medical check-up. Patients with EoE had more symptoms (69.7% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.01) such as dysphagia and food impaction, and more allergies (65.2% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.01) compared with the controls. The prevalence of atrophic gastritis was lower in EoE patients than in the controls (20.0% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The prevalence of EoE in the Japanese population was 0.051% which was comparable with previous reports in Japan. History of allergies and the absence of atrophic gastritis were associated with EoE.

The Predictive Factors of Responsiveness to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Approximately half of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) respond clinically and histologically to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Although recent guidelines suggest that PPI-responders and non-responders were included in EoE, it is important to investigate the predictive factors of PPI- responsiveness. This study aimed to determine the rate of PPI- responders and compare the characteristics of PPI-responders and non-responders. Fifty-nine patients with esophageal eosinophilia received PPI therapy for eight weeks, and its efficacy was assessed. PPI- responsiveness was diagnosed based on the relief in symptoms and reduction of intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration to <15 per high-power field (hpf) after PPI therapy. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with PPI-responders. Of the 59 patients, 41 (69.5%) were diagnosed with PPI-responders. The rate of gastrointestinal (GI) screening in the indications for endoscopy was significantly higher in patients with PPI- responders than in those with non-responders. On multivariate analysis, GI screening and presence of reflux esophagitis was associated with an increased odds ratio (OR) of PPI-responders, but presence of rings with a decreased OR of PPI-responders. Presence of reflux esophagitis and absence of rings on endoscopy especially during GI screening might be significant predictive factors for PPI response in patients with EoE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in Japanese patients: A mild and slow-progressing disorder

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Awareness of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has gradually increased in Japan, therefore the characteristics of this disease in the Japanese patient population need to be elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the features of EoE in the Japanese population.

METHODS

During a 2-year period, all gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed with maximum attention being paid to identify EoE through endoscopic findings. Clinical features and findings were analyzed among this population.

RESULTS

Among a total of 8589 patients (general gastrointestinal endoscopy, performed for evaluation of symptoms or disease follow-up: 3669; medical check-up endoscopy, routinely performed in asymptomatic patients: 4920), 17 patients (0.20%) were diagnosed with esophageal eosinophilia (mean age ± standard deviation: 44±11.9 years; 1 female). Only 6 patients with esophageal eosinophilia were diagnosed by general gastrointestinal endoscopy; among them, 3 patients had dysphagia and 3 were asymptomatic. The remaining 11 patients were diagnosed by medical check-up endoscopy. All patients were treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI); 5 were diagnosed with EoE and 12 with PPI responsive esophageal eosinophilia. Chronological endoscopy analysis showed that EoE findings could be observed for a mean of 6.1 years prior to diagnosis, and the disease did not significantly progress in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Most Japanese patients with EoE have mild and slowly progressing disease, which can be diagnosed when close attention is paid to the endoscopic findings. Medical check-up endoscopy in Japan could be a great opportunity for the early diagnosis of EoE.

The Global Face of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Advocacy and Research Groups

Although eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been described in the literature for a substantial period, its recognition as a disease entity on the global stage is still relatively new. It has become a major diagnosis of consideration by medical providers when both adult and pediatric patients present with dysphagia, food impaction, and gastroesophageal reflux-like symptoms. In addition to the clinical work of specialists such as allergy-immunologists and gastroenterologists, the evolution of research organizations and advocacy groups focused on EoE have greatly assisted in bringing attention to, and raising awareness about, this disease. As a result of their efforts, diagnosis and treatment guidelines have been developed, and medical providers now have a specific ICD code for EoE. This represents a new model for the interaction of patients and medical provider, where patients not only advocate for their disorder, but also drive physician education and a patient-centered research agenda and its funding. It should be noted, though, that these organizations and advocacy groups are mainly located in North America and Europe, and as a result, EoE has largely been associated with the Caucasian demographic. However, it has been described in Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa. Physicians from these areas have increased awareness and understanding in the medical and research communities in their countries through case reports and the establishment and analysis of potential patient cohorts. At this time, the prevalence of EoE in these regions is comparably lower, but this may be due to less recognition and understanding of EoE, as well as medical efforts being directed towards more ubiquitous disease processes, such as infectious diseases. With the support and ongoing work of researchers, patients, and their family members, understanding and recognition of EoE as a clinically significant disease entity will continue to grow.

[Recent progress in the research of Eosinophilic GastroIntestinal Diseases (EGIDs)]

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE), which are included in eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs), are allergic gastrointestinal diseases mainly caused by food allergens, which features dense infiltration of eosinophiles in the gastrointestinal mucosa. A possible mechanism of these diseases are Th2 type allergic reactions, including IL-5, IL-13, and IL-15, thymic stromal protein (TSLP), and eotaxin 3, which are considered to have important roles. The number of patients with EoE is rapidly increasing in both Western and Asian countries. In Japan, a research group of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare has announced recommendations for the diagnosis and management of EoE and EGE in 2015. For a diagnosis of EoE, endoscopic abnormalities and histological confirmation of dense eosinophile infiltration in the esophageal epithelial layer are important, in addition to identifying dysphagia symptoms. As for eosinophilic gastroenteritis, blood test findings are more useful and the role of an endoscopic examination is reduced. Glucocorticoid administration is standard treatment for these diseases, while proton pump inhibitors are frequently effective for EoE. As for EoE, on the one hand, a variety of studies have been performed and new findings collected. On the other hand, information concerning EGE is limited and additional evidence is needed to establish effective treatment options.

A Prospective Study of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and the Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms

Background/Aims

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is often erroneously diagnosed as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of EoE and the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins in patients with GERD symptoms.

Methods

One hundred patients with GERD symptoms and 10 healthy controls were prospectively studied. Sixty-two patients had symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors (PPI). All patients underwent esophageal biopsy. Patients were diagnosed with EoE if the number of eosinophil granulocytes per high-power field was ≥15. Immunohistochemical analysis of TJ proteins (claudin-1, claudin-4, occludin, and zonula occludin-1 [ZO-1]) was performed.

Results

EoE was diagnosed in six of 100 patients (6%) with GERD symptoms and in six patients (9.7%) of 62 patients with PPI-refractory GERD. Only one had typical EoE endoscopic findings. The proportion of ZO-1-positive cells was significantly lower in the lower than in the middle esophagus (56.0%±14.0% vs 66.0%±11.5%, p＜0.05). There were no significant correlations between TJ protein expression and GERD symptoms.

Conclusions

The prevalence of EoE among patients with PPI-refractory GERD is approximately 10%. Regardless of endoscopic findings, esophageal biopsy is crucial in diagnosing EoE. The disruption of ZO-1 expression in the lower esophagus is significantly associated with GERD symptoms.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan: Focus on response to acid suppressive therapy

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by esophageal dysfunction and dense eosinophilic infiltration of esophageal epithelium. According to clinical consensus and guidelines published in 2011, esophageal eosinophilia was classified into two entities based on response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration: EoE and PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE). We have performed a series of investigations to determine whether EoE is actually different from PPI-REE. Consistent with Western reports, more than half of our examined patients with symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia suggestive of EoE achieved histological remission with single PPI therapy. Furthermore, our comparisons of clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological findings between patients with EoE and those with PPI-REE revealed nearly no differences between them. We also compared gene expression profiles in mucosal biopsy specimens between those groups and found that microarray findings obtained from PPI-REE patients substantially overlapped with those from EoE patients, suggesting that both represent the same condition or are variations of a single disease. In addition, we have noted that more than half of EoE patients who show resistance to a PPI therapy respond to vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has been shown to provide more potent and sustained suppression of gastric acid secretion than PPIs. Our results indicate that PPI-REE may constitute a subtype of EoE. Based on novel evidence including results obtained in our studies, the most recently updated guidelines have included responders to PPI therapy within the spectrum of EoE, abandoning the term PPI-REE.

Serum Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

Objective Clinically useful serum biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are not available. This study was conducted to examine the possible value of eosinophil-related proteins as serum biomarkers. Methods The serum concentrations of 49 cytokines, chemokines, and other proteins were measured in 29 patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases and 80 controls. Results The levels of interleukin (IL)-5, IL-33, eotaxin-3, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), previously reported as possible biomarkers of eosinophilic esophagitis, were not significantly elevated in the serum. In contrast, the B cell-attracting chemokine (BCA)-1/chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL) 13 and hemofiltrate C-C chemokine (HCC)-1/CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 14α levels were significantly elevated, while the granulocyte chemotactic protein (GCP)-2/CXCL6 levels were suppressed in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis as well as in those with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. The cutaneus T cell-attracting chemokine (CTACK)/CCL27, stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1/CXCL12, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3β/CCL19, and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) 2 levels were elevated only in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. However, there were large overlaps of data obtained from the patient and control groups, indicating that these serum biomarkers are not adequately sensitive for clinical use with presently available assay systems. Conclusion Of the 49 investigated serum proteins, none were shown to be adequately sensitive for use as biomarkers for the diagnosis or monitoring of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Eosinophilic esophageal myositis diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a case report

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is diagnosed by microscopic findings of eosinophilic infiltration into the squamous epithelium. In contrast, another disease concept termed "eosinophilic esophageal myositis (EoEM)" has been proposed, whereby there is eosinophilic infiltration into the muscularis propria instead. A 60-year-old man was referred to our hospital for chest pain, dysphagia, and several episodes of esophageal food impaction. Although EoE was suspected based on clinical features, biopsy specimens showed no mucosal eosinophilic infiltration. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed thickening of the muscularis propria layer and subsequent EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) revealed eosinophilic infiltration into the muscularis propria. Although the patient's symptoms gradually improved after steroid administration, complete remission was not achieved after 1 year of treatment. This case may reflect a disorder distinct from typical EoE based on eosinophilic infiltration of the muscularis propria but not the squamous epithelium, and we, therefore, diagnosed it as EoEM using the EUS-FNA findings as reference.

A Japanese case of lymphocytic esophagitis

We report the case of a 68-year-old Japanese man diagnosed with lymphocytic esophagitis (LE), a rare disease associated with refractory dysphagia. He has had severe dysphagia and heartburn since 2007. Findings of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) carried out by a local physician in 2010 showed pale mucosa with white exudate and lateral furrows in the esophagus. He was referred to Tohoku University Hospital in 2012, because the symptoms did not improve, despite regular use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). At that time, EGD revealed the coexistence of a slight stricture in the upper esophagus, the histopathological findings of which included a predominantly peri-papillary distribution of abundant, infiltrating CD3⁺ /CD4⁺ /CD8⁺ /CD20^- lymphocytes without any granulocytes (CD4⁺  : CD8⁺  = 3.3:1). These were consistent with a diagnostic criteria of LE. Thereafter, severe dysphagia with food impaction occurred twice a month, despite the long-term use of a PPI, and EGD showed worsened strictures, where endoscopic ultrasonography findings showed marked circumferential thickness of the mucosal and submucosal layers. Then, one session of endoscopic balloon dilatation dramatically improved the dysphagia. Accordingly, LE should be considered an important differential diagnosis of refractory dysphagia based on the characteristic features of endoscopic and pathological findings.

Suitable biopsy site for detection of esophageal eosinophilia in eosinophilic esophagitis suspected cases

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Esophageal eosinophilia (EE) is the most important finding for the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. We conducted the present retrospective study to clarify the most suitable site of the esophagus to examine for EE detection.

METHODS

We enrolled 4999 subjects who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening examinations as part of a detailed health check-up. When endoscopic esophageal abnormalities characteristic of eosinophilic esophagitis were observed, two or three biopsy specimens were obtained from the middle or lower esophagus, and endoscopic findings of fixed rings, exudates, furrows, edema, stricture, and crepe paper esophagus in biopsied sites were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five subjects underwent histological examination for EE, of whom 20 showed positive findings in biopsied specimens. Higher grade endoscopic findings of exudates, furrows, and edema were observed in cases with EE in comparison to the 15 without EE, whereas statistically significant higher grade endoscopic findings of exudates, furrows, and edema were also observed in biopsied sites with EE in comparison to those without EE. In addition, a positive finding of EE in biopsied specimens from the lower esophagus was significantly more frequently noted as compared to those from the middle esophagus. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that a lower esophagus biopsy site and severe exudates were significant factors related to a positive EE finding in biopsied specimens.

CONCLUSION

The most suitable conditions for detection of EE are a lower esophagus biopsy site and the presence of exudates in cases suspicious of eosinophilic esophagitis shown by endoscopy.

Racial differences in eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders among Caucasian and Asian

BACKGROUND

Although there is an increasing number of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) cases including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE), being reported globally, no systematic reviews have been conducted to elucidate the racial differences in these disorders. We aimed to show the racial differences, especially among Caucasians and Asians, in the risk of EoE and EGE.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using PubMed in September 2012. All case reports and case series on EGID that involved human subjects and described race or ethnicity, as well as pathological findings, were included. For the comparison of reported cases between Caucasians and Asians, a chi-squared test was used.

RESULTS

Among the 687 studies found in PubMed, 121 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In total, 2621 patients were reviewed. Among Caucasian EGID patients, 94% had EoE; while among Asian EGID patients, 72% had EGE (p < 0.001). Among EoE, Asians were significantly less likely to have dysphagia and heartburn, but more likely to have vomit and abdominal pain, compared to Caucasians (p < 0.001). Further, among EGE, Asians were significantly more likely to have eosinophil-infiltrated colon than Caucasians (OR: 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60-7.04), but were less likely to have eosinophil-infiltrated stomach (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that EoE occurs more frequently in Caucasian EGID patients than Asian EGID patients, while the reverse is true for EGE. Also, racial disparities in symptoms and eosinophil-infiltrated tissues were observed. Our findings suggest further genetic and environmental studies to elucidate the etiology of EGID.

Prevalence of esophageal eosinophilia and eosinophilic esophagitis in adults: a population-based endoscopic study in Shanghai, China

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Population-based endoscopic studies of esophageal eosinophilia and eosinophilic esophagitis are limited in the world. This study was aiming to describe features of esophageal eosinophilia and eosinophilic esophagitis in a representative sample of the adult in Shanghai, China.

METHODS

As part of a large epidemiological study, 3,600 individuals (aged 18-80 years) were randomly selected in Shanghai, China. They were asked to undergo endoscopy and have at least four esophageal biopsies taken from 0.5 cm above the Z-line and any abnormal areas. Any eosinophil infiltration of the epithelium was defined as esophageal eosinophilia. Eosinophilic esophagitis was defined as ≥15 eosinophils/high-power field in esophageal biopsies.

RESULTS

A total of 1,030 individuals accepted to have endoscopy and 1,021 individuals with biopsy results were suitable for analysis. Esophageal eosinophilia was present in 67 subjects (6.6 %). Eosinophilic esophagitis was present in four cases (0.4 %). No significant association was found between the presence of esophageal eosinophilia and reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, symptom-defined gastroesophageal reflux disease or H. pylori infection. Most individuals with esophageal eosinophilia (80.6 %) did not have any of the upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal eosinophilia was present in nearly 6.6 % of the general adult population of China; 0.4 % had eosinophilic esophagitis. Most of individuals with esophageal eosinophilia were asymptomatic.

Clinical features of eosinophilic esophagitis: differences between Asian and Western populations

The prevalence and incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have been rapidly increasing in Western countries. It is thought to be more common among Caucasians than other racial or ethnic groups, but epidemiological studies have not been fully evaluated in Asian populations, and its clinical manifestation is rarely documented. In this review, recent reports regarding EoE in Asian countries have been collected, and differences in the clinical features, including symptoms and endoscopic findings, between Asian and Western populations have been evaluated. In Asia, EoE is still much less prevalent than in Western countries. Baseline values for average age, male/female ratio, and personal history of allergic disease were comparable to those in Western populations. Predominant symptoms were dysphagia, and food impaction was extremely rare among Asian patients. Although the frequency of abnormal endoscopic findings varies among studies, over 90% of patients with EoE have shown abnormal findings such as linear furrow, which is the most common findings, in recent prospective studies in Asia. There are few reports regarding the treatment of EoE and no prospective studies evaluating drugs or elimination diet in patient with EoE have been reported in Asia. Overall, EoE had similar clinical characteristics in Asian populations. Because the incidence of EoE could increase in the future with the increase in allergic disorders in Asian countries, large-scale, nationwide prospective studies should be performed to more fully understand the epidemiology and pathophysiology of EoE in Asian populations.

Comparison of clinical features in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis living in an urban and rural environment

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been associated with exposure to aeroallergens. Living in different locations (urban vs. rural) could potentially expose individuals to different environmental factors. Currently, there is limited data on the matter, and all was based on small population studies that did not exclude proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-responsive esophageal eosinophilia in their cohort. The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of EoE in an urban versus rural population and compare demographic and clinical characteristics in patients that had been treated with high-dose PPI prior to diagnosis. Esophageal biopsies were obtained from a cohort of patients who presented with symptoms of dysphagia, odynophagia, globus sensation, and heartburn during a 10-year period. Only patients who had biopsies from the mid and distal esophagus with ≥20 eosinophils per high-power field while on high-dose PPI treatment during endoscopy were included. Urban population was defined as >1000 people/square mile, and rural population was defined as ≤1000 people/square mile (U.S. Census Bureau). Demographic data from each group was analyzed for age, sex, body mass index, duration of symptoms, and tobacco use. Chi-square analysis was used for frequencies with statistical significance defined as P ≤ 0.05. A total of 20 718 patients were identified and their records evaluated. From this cohort, 57 (0.28%) symptomatic patients (male/female: 39/18, mean age = 29.5 years) had biopsy-proven EoE (≥20 eosinophils/hpf) while on PPI treatment. Of those EoE patients, 29 (50.9%) reported living in rural area versus 28 (49.1%) living in the urban area. The most common medical history components included asthma (12.3%), and the most common presenting symptoms included dysphagia (50.9%), heartburn (26.3%), and nausea/vomiting (22.8%). The average duration of symptoms, body mass index, and smoking habits did not differ between the groups. Dysphagia was significantly more prevalent in the urban population (37.9% vs. 64.3% P = 0.047), while heartburn and reflux were more prevalent in the rural population (37.9% vs. 14.3 P = 0.043). Asthma was prevalent in both populations without a significant difference (P = not significant). There is no residential variation in the incidence of EoE among patients with non-PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. Dysphagia was more prevalent in the urban population, while heartburn and reflux symptoms were more prevalent in the rural environment. Further exploration of environmental factors and specific allergens may help explain the varying symptoms and causes of EoE.

FDG PET/CT in eosinophilic esophagitis

A 37-year-old man presented with left upper abdominal pain for 13 months. Laboratory examinations showed elevated peripheral eosinophils. Chest CT showed thickened wall of the entire esophagus. FDG PET/CT was performed showing diffuse FDG uptake in the thickened esophageal wall. Esophageal endoscopy showed pale and edematous mucosa. Histologic examination of the esophageal biopsy specimens revealed marked eosinophil infiltration of the mucosa. The clinical and pathologic findings were consistent with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This case indicates EoE should be included in the differential diagnosis of abnormal FDG accumulation in the esophageal wall along with malignant and nonmalignant conditions.

Clinical effects of eosinophilic esophagitis observed using endoscopic ultrasound

A 50-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for dysphagia and several episodes of esophageal food impaction during the prior three months. Complete blood count and basic biochemical tests were normal. No eosinophilia was found. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed the presence of concentric rings (esophageal "trachealization") and stenosis along the middle and distal esophagus. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed circumferential thickening of all layers in the same part. Cytopathologic evaluation of a specimen obtained by endoscopic biopsy of the thickened area in the distal esophagus showed eosinophilic infiltration (20 eosinophils per high-powered field). She was diagnosed as having eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Topical steroid therapy was started. A tendency of dysphagia for relief and improvement of characteristic EGD findings began early, but wall thickening in EUS remained. Past reports of the related literature have described that thickness of submucosa and muscularis propria remained after therapy, although significant reduction in the mucosal thickness was provided by short-term steroid therapy. One explanation for early relapse is insufficient reduction in the submucosa and muscularis propria. Consequently, our patient was given steroids until thickness on EUS improved. EUS is regarded as useful for evaluating the curative effect in patients with EoE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in a developing country: is it different from developed countries?

Background and Objective. Despite the extensive reporting of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) from industrialized developed countries, reports from developing countries are rare. The aim of our study was to determine the epidemiological, clinical, and endoscopic features of EoE and response to therapy in children and adults from a developing country, Saudi Arabia. Methods. We identified patients diagnosed with EoE in our center from 2004 to 2011. EoE was defined as esophageal mucosal infiltration with a peak eosinophil count ≥15 eosinophils/high-powered field. Results. Forty-five patients were diagnosed with EoE (37 children and 8 adults; 36 males; median age 10.5 years, range from 1–37 years). Feeding difficulty, vomiting/regurgitation, and failure to thrive predominated in young children, whereas dysphagia and food impactions predominated in older children and adults. Allergy testing revealed food sensitization in 12 of 15 patients (80%); 3 responded to elemental formula, while 8 failed to respond to dietary manipulation after the allergy testing. Thirty-nine patients achieved remission by swallowed inhaled fluticasone. The majority of patients experienced a recurrence of symptoms upon the discontinuation of fluticasone. Conclusion. Our data indicate that EoE is increasingly recognized in Saudi Arabia and show many similarities to data from North America and Europe.

Clinical features of eosinophilic esophagitis: ten Japanese cases

AIM

We studied eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) to clarify the clinical and endoscopic features of a Japanese case series.

METHODS

Records of 10 patients diagnosed with EE at our hospital between May 2010 and December 2011 were examined for age, sex, symptoms, allergic disorder, endoscopic findings, and treatment received. Esophageal wall thickness was measured by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

RESULTS

Patients were seven males and three females with a mean age of 48 years. Symptoms included dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and chest pain. Nine patients had a history of allergic diseases. Increased peripheral eosinophil count was observed in one patient whereas increased immunoglobulin E level was observed in eight patients. Endoscopic findings included longitudinal furrows in all patients, mucosal edema in nine patients, loss of vascular pattern in nine patients, white exudates in six patients, cobblestone-like appearance in five patients, and concentric rings in three patients. EUS revealed thickening of the esophageal wall in one patient. Histopathological examination revealed eosinophilic infiltration (≥15 eosinophils/high-powered field) in the esophageal epithelium of all patients. Treatment was required in six patients. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was given as the first-line treatment but was ineffective in four patients and effective in two patients. Steroid therapy was given to three patients unresponsive to PPI therapy and was effective.

CONCLUSIONS

EE was common among relatively young men and was associated with allergic diseases. Longitudinal furrows were observed as the most characteristic endoscopic finding. Esophageal wall thickening was not commonly observed by EUS.

Clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) have not been fully clarified. For understanding the pathogenesis as well as providing support for accurate diagnosis, precise information regarding clinical characteristics of these diseases is important.

METHODS

A questionnaire-based survey of EoE and EGE was conducted in 1,078 teaching hospitals. Clinical data of patients with confirmed EoE or EGE diagnosed from 2004 to 2009 were collected.

RESULT

Clinical data from 26 patients with EoE and 144 patients with EGE were collected. The mean ages of patients in both groups were in the 40s. Those with EoE frequently complained of dysphagia and heartburn, and had characteristic endoscopic features such as longitudinal furrows and multiple concentric rings in the esophagus, while only 34% had peripheral eosinophilia. Patients with EGE frequently complained of abdominal pain and diarrhea, and approximately 80% of them have peripheral eosinophilia. They did not have characteristic endoscopic features helpful for diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) findings and the presence of peripheral eosinophilia were diagnostic for EGE. EGE patients with a small intestinal involvement showed the highest peripheral eosinophil counts. Glucocorticoid administration was the most widely used treatment for these diseases and its effect was favorable for at least induction of remission.

CONCLUSION

EGE is more prevalent than EoE in Japan. Patients with EGE have abdominal pain and diarrhea, high peripheral eosinophil counts, and gastrointestinal wall thickening identifiable by CT findings, while EoE is characterized by dysphagia and characteristic endoscopic features.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) represents a chronic, immune/antigen-mediated inflammatory esophageal disease characterized clinicopathologically by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. The pathogenesis of EoE is incompletely understood but is generally considered to be related to IgE- and non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. The diagnosis of EoE relies mainly on typical clinical presentations, esophageal pathological changes, and exclusion of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GRED) and other conditions that cause esophageal eosinophilia. Management options include dietary modifications, pharmacological therapy, and endoscopic dilation.

A multicenter study on the prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis and PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilic infiltration

OBJECTIVE

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is diagnosed by the presence of dysphagia and intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration of ≥15 per high-power field (HPF). EoE should be distinguished from proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilic infiltration (PPI-R EEI) in patients that are responsive to PPI treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of EoE and PPI-R EEI in Japanese patients in a multicenter study.

METHODS

Ten hospitals participated in this study. Esophageal biopsy was performed when the patients had typical EoE symptoms or when endoscopic findings revealed a typical EoE appearance. EEI was defined as the intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration of ≥15 per HPF. Patients with EEI received rabeprazole for 8 weeks to distinguish EoE from PPI-R EEI.

RESULTS

A total of 13,634 subjects that underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy because of further examination or as a routine checkup were enrolled. Seventy-one (0.5%) patients suspected with EoE were examined by biopsy. A histological examination of 7 (9.9%) cases revealed EEI. Two of these 7 patients showed no symptoms and the other 5 were treated with PPI. Two (0.01%) patients were diagnosed with EoE and 3 (0.02%) with PPI-R EEI.

CONCLUSION

EoE and PPI-R EEI were rare in Japanese patients that underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with marked eosinophil infiltration

We report a case of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with marked eosinophil infiltration which was identified postoperatively in the esophageal wall in areas not surrounding the SCC. The eosinophil infiltration was seen in the submucosa, muscle and adventitia, but not in the mucosa. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a pathological condition defined as eosinophil infiltration within the esophageal mucosa. Eosinophil infiltration at the invasion front of esophageal SCC is termed tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE). However, the eosinophil infiltration in this case may be pathologically different from both EoE and TATE. To our knowledge, this is the first report of esophageal SCC with eosinophil infiltration.

Eosinophilic esophagitis investigated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japanese patients

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is increasing rapidly in Western countries. Several case series of EE have also been reported in Japan. However, the prevalence of EE in Japanese patients as investigated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is unknown. Therefore, we carried out a prospective multicenter study to address this issue.

METHODS

From July to December 2010, 23,346 patients who had undergone routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in 17 institutions were enrolled. In patients with symptoms suggesting EE, such as dysphasia, food impaction, and heartburn, and/or in patients in whom endoscopic findings suggested pathology, esophageal biopsy samples were collected, and the numbers of eosinophils in the squamous epithelium were counted.

RESULTS

During the study period of 6 months, 4 patients were endoscopically and histologically diagnosed with EE. The prevalence of EE was calculated to be 17.1/100,000.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of EE in Japanese patients by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has now been documented.

Variation in prevalence, diagnostic criteria, and initial management options for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases in the United States

OBJECTIVES

Variation in the prevalence of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases in different geographical regions has not been extensively studied. The aim of the present study was to define the regional and national prevalence of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, and differences in practice approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We administered a survey electronically to members of the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, and the North American Society Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. Questions pertained to the number and proportion of patients seen with eosinophilic gastroenteritis or colitis and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and methods used to diagnose and treat these conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 1836 physicians responded from 10,874 requests (17% response). Extrapolating responses from our US sample, we estimated an overall prevalence of 52 and 28/100,000 for EoE and eosinophilic gastroenteritis or colitis. The patient burden of EoE is higher in urban (0.58) and suburban (0.44) compared with rural settings (0.36, P < 0.0065), observations consistent with other allergic disorders. There was also increased prevalence in northeast region when calculated by prevalence per 100,000. There was considerable variability in criteria and initial treatment options used to diagnose EoE. Only one-third of respondents reported using diagnostic criteria proposed in a 2007 consensus document. Seventy-one and 35% of respondents reported treating some patients with EoE with a food elimination or elemental diet, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EoE is diagnosed more often in northeastern states and urban areas. There is considerable variability in diagnostic criteria and initial treatment approach supporting the need for additional clinical trials and consensus development.

A Japanese case series of 12 patients with esophageal eosinophilia

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been a rarely recognized condition in Asian populations, and its clinical manifestation is rarely documented. Our aim was to describe clinically, endoscopically, and pathologically the features of patients with esophageal eosinophilia, including EoE.

METHODS

Twelve patients histologically proven to have esophageal eosinophilia were investigated. The histological diagnostic cutoff value was defined as a peak of ≥15 eosinophils/high-power field (HPF) in esophageal biopsies. Symptoms, endoscopic and pathological findings, and treatment outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine of the 12 patients were male and the 12 patients had a mean age of 47.7 years. Allergic conditions were concurrent in a total of 3 patients. Mild peripheral eosinophilia was observed in only 2 patients. The predominant symptom was solid-food dysphagia, but some patients complained of heartburn, or chest, epigastric, or back pain. Three asymptomatic subjects were also incidentally diagnosed during endoscopic screening. Linear furrows, concentric rings, and white exudates in the esophagus were frequently observed. In 4 of 5 patients who were administered a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), esophageal eosinophilia was histologically decreased or disappeared with symptom relief and endoscopic improvement. In 2 patients unresponsive to PPI, topical steroid therapy, administered by the swallowing of fluticasone propionate, led to symptomatic and histological remission.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic recognition of linear furrows, concentric rings, and white exudates is important in the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophageal inflammation. In a subset of patients this condition improves clinicopathologically with PPI treatment, and typical EoE, as strictly defined by unresponsiveness to PPI, appears to be a rather rare condition.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: a case report with a review of the literature

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an allergic inflammatory condition of the esophagus and is characterized by dense eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. There has been a dramatic increase in the diagnosis of EE in Western countries in recent years; however, in Japan, there are very few reports of EE. We present a rare case of EE in a 70-year-old Japanese woman, who had dysphasia for 2 years, but which worsened over a 6-month period. Laboratory examinations showed peripheral eosinophilia (1279/μl). Significant thickening of the esophageal wall was observed on computed tomography scan and many circular rings appeared when an esophagogastroduodenoscopy was carried out. From these circular rings, EE was suspected and a biopsy was then taken from the esophagus. As the histologic findings from the esophageal biopsy showed that >25 eosinophils existed per high-power field, the patient was diagnosed with EE. Oral corticosteroid (prednisolone 30 mg/day) therapy was administered and after 3 days of treatment her symptoms almost disappeared. EE needs to be considered as a differential diagnosis if patients with non-erosive reflux disease have dysphagia but do not respond to high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy.

The link between allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis: implications for management strategies

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) has an increased incidence of diagnosis similar to other atopic diseases. We present a recent literature review of the common features between atopic diseases (i.e., asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis) and EE. All of the disorders have allergen triggers and evidence of a possible Th2 inflammation at the site of disease. Murine models have also shown similar features with the importance of T cells and Th2 cytokines for the development of disease. The diseases share underlying inflammation with the potential for remodeling with an increase in TGF-beta expression in asthma and EE. However, differences do exist between the diseases in treatment and pathogenesis. For EE, there are two basic treatment options: avoidance of the food triggers or treatment of the eosinophilic inflammation with corticosteroids.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disease based on a clinicopathologic diagnosis that involves a localized eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus. A significant increase in the diagnosis of pediatric EoE has occurred over the past 10 years not only due to a greater recognition of the disease among gastroenterologists, allergists, and pathologists but also secondary to an increased incidence of the disease. EoE is defined by the presence of 15 or more esophageal eosinophils per high-power field isolated to the esophagus associated with clinical symptoms that do not respond to acid suppression therapy. Although the exact mechanism of EoE is unknown, food allergens are thought to have an important role. Effective treatment options include dietary restrictions and various steroid formulations.

3-yr-follow-up of topical corticosteroid treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis in adults

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a clinicopathologic syndrome comprising isolated eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus, with symptoms of dysphagia, and possibly, reflux. It was initially described in children, and in recent years, there is a heightened awareness in adults. The etiology is not completely understood. The treatments include dietary manipulation, topical corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, Montelukast, and endoscopic dilation. In adults, there are no randomized trials demonstrating the efficacy of any particular treatment, and no prospective studies describing the natural history of the disease following treatment.

METHODS

We performed an interval follow-up of patients treated with a swallowed corticosteroid inhaler. We contacted 51 adult patients who were diagnosed with EE and treated with a swallowed corticosteroid inhaler between September 1, 1999, and May 31, 2003. All patients had received 6 wk of treatment with fluticasone 220 mEq/puff, four puffs swallowed twice daily for 6 wk.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients replied (63%) with a mean follow-up duration of 3.3 yr. Ninety-one percent of patients reported recurrent symptoms; a mean of 8.8 months after treatment was completed. Sixty-nine percent of patients repeated treatment with the steroid inhaler at least once.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that EE is a chronic remitting disorder that requires more than one topical steroid treatment course.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: a case report. Effective treatment with systemic corticosteroids for the relapse of the disease

We report on a case of eosinophilic esophagitis in a 33-year-old Japanese woman who visited our hospital with dysphagia and esophageal food impaction in April 2006. She had had the same symptoms in May 2005, and, by endoscopic and histologic examination, she was diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis. Biopsy specimens from multiple locations in the esophageal mucosa had shown remarkable infiltration of eosinophils, more than 20 eosinophils per high-power field in squamous mucosa, and she had been treated with Th2 cytokine antagonist and proton pump inhibitor at the time. Her symptoms had not improved, but she had received no further medical treatment. In 2006, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed edematous whitish esophageal mucosa, multiple ulcerations with whitish exudates on their surfaces, and white plaques. Biopsy specimens showed the same change as before, and corticosteroid (prednisolone 20 mg/day) was administered orally. After 2 weeks of corticosteroid therapy, her symptom had effectively improved. Endoscopy after 15 weeks of the therapy revealed remarkable improvement, and biopsy specimens from esophageal mucosa revealed the disappearance of the eosinophil infiltrates. We report on a case of eosinophilic esophagitis effectively treated with systemic corticosteroids. Eosinophilic esophagitis has, as yet, no standardized treatment. However, wider recognition of its features on endoscopy may reveal more cases, thereby increasing our understanding of this disease, and will provide new therapeutic possibilities.

Epidemiology and etiology of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an inflammatory disease of the esophagus characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. Symptoms of EE are variable, and include gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, abdominal pain, growth failure, and dysphagia. Dysphagia is a more common presentation in adults and older children. Serious complications of EE consisting of esophageal food impactions necessitating urgent endoscopic removal of the food and esophageal strictures requiring endoscopic balloon dilatations are also seen. The potential severity of these symptoms points to the importance of proper recognition and management of the disease, especially given that EE has become more prevalent over the past decade. In this article, available evidence on the epidemiology and etiology of EE is discussed.

Esophageal dysmotility in patients who have eosinophilic esophagitis

The understanding of esophageal motility alterations in patients who have eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is in its infancy despite the common presenting complaint of dysphagia. A diversity of motility disorders has been reported in patients who have EE including achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, nutcracker esophagus, and nonspecific motility alterations including high-amplitude esophageal body contractions, tertiary contractions, abnormalities in lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and other peristaltic problems. Some evidence suggests that treatment of EE will improve motility. Technological advances such as high-resolution manometry and combined manometry with impedance may provide new insight into more subtle motility abnormalities.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: endoscopic findings

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a condition characterized by a dense infiltration of eosinophils within the epithelium that may extend into the deeper layers of the esophagus associated with distinctive endoscopic changes. The changes are frequently found in patients who have hypersensitivity to various foods and aeroallergens but overlap exists with gastroesophageal reflux disease. It is essential for all endoscopists to become familiar with the endoscopic findings of eosinophilic esophagitis to avoid delays or errors in diagnosis and to optimally assess outcomes of treatment.

Educational clinical case series in pediatric allergy and immunology

Eosinophilic inflammation may occur in any part of the intestinal tract from the esophagus to the rectum. Despite 70 yr having passed since the first reference to a case of eosinophilic gastroenteritis, the epidemiology and natural history of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are still poorly known. Insights into their etiology and pathogenesis have revealed an important role for allergens; interleukins 4, 5, and 13; the eotaxin family of chemokines; and eosinophil-derived proteins. Diagnosis is confirmed by typical histologic features in a patient with a suggestive clinical phenotype. Treatment involves eliminating triggering allergens, making dietary restrictions the first choice of therapy in a compliant patient; corticosteroids [topical in eosinophilic esophagitis (EE)], despite the potential for serious side effects, are used with success in refractory and non-compliant patients. In this study we discuss EE and gastroduodenitis against the backdrop of clinical case presentations.

Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging clinicopathologic entity defined by abnormal esophageal eosinophilic infiltration. Our understanding of this disease is hampered by the lack of a uniform diagnostic standard. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the range of diagnostic strategies and histologic criteria in the EoE literature.

METHODS

The MEDLINE-indexed literature from 1950 through December 31, 2006 was independently searched by two investigators. To identify additional relevant studies, bibliographies were hand searched, as were the published proceedings of the 2000-2006 American College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association national meetings. Data were extracted from all human EoE case reports, case series, cross-sectional and cohort studies, and clinical trials.

RESULTS

Of 318 publications initially identified, 116 original articles, 39 abstracts, and 69 reviews were included. We found 10 different histologic definitions of EoE, ranging from 5 to 30 eosinophils per high-powered field (hpf), though 41 (35%) of the original articles did not state their diagnostic criteria. In the 13 original articles (11%) reporting an hpf area, the eosinophil density per mm(2) varied 23-fold. There was also variation in esophageal biopsy protocols, but specific protocols were reported in just 45 (39%) original articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis exists, and in a large proportion of studies, criteria are not reported. Because of this lack of a common disease definition, conclusions drawn from the cumulative EoE literature should be viewed with caution. A consensus research-quality standard for diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is needed.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a disorder increasing in frequency that typically causes symptoms similar to those seen with gastroesophageal reflux, and is characterized by increased eosinophils isolated to the esophagus despite the use of antireflux medications. We present a review of the literature including basic science research, prevalence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of eosinophilic esophagitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past few years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of publications relating to eosinophilic esophagitis in terms of case reports, cohorts of patients, familial occurrences, pathogenesis, and treatment options. Recent work confirms the role of food allergy in many patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Several medications, including corticosteroids [topical (swallowed) or systemic], leukotriene receptor antagonists and, most recently, biologic molecules (such as anti-IL5), have been utilized. Although eosinophilic esophagitis is treatable, it is thought to be a chronic illness that requires dietary restriction or chronic medical therapy.

SUMMARY

Eosinophilic esophagitis is being diagnosed in both children and adults with increasing frequency. Allergists, gastroenterologists, pathologists, internists, pediatricians, and otolaryngologists must not only be educated to be able to properly identify patients with eosinophilic esophagitis but also be informed about the current treatment and management of these patients.