The relationship between the PD-L1 expression of surgically resected and fine-needle aspiration specimens for patients with pancreatic cancer

From rough to precise: PD-L1 evaluation for predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades

Developing biomarkers for accurately predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies is conducive to avoiding unwanted side effects and economic burden. At the moment, the quantification of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor tissues is clinically used as one of the combined diagnostic assays of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. However, the current assays for evaluating PD-L1 remain imperfect. Recent studies are promoting the methodologies of PD-L1 evaluation from rough to precise. Standardization of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry tests is being promoted by using optimized reagents, platforms, and cutoff values. Combining novel in vivo probes with PET or SPECT will probably be of benefit to map the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression. The dynamic change of PD-L1 in the circulatory system can also be realized by liquid biopsy. Consider PD-L1 expressed on non-tumor (immune and non-immune) cells, and optimized combination detection indexes are further improving the accuracy of PD-L1 in predicting the efficacy of ICIs. The combinations of artificial intelligence with novel technologies are conducive to the intelligence of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker. In this review, we will provide an overview of the recent progress in this rapidly growing area and discuss the clinical and technical challenges.

Evaluation of MMR Status and PD-L1 Expression Using Specimens Obtained by EUS-FNB in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Deficient DNA mismatch repair status (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability have been shown to be predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs which block the programmed death protein-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) interaction between tumor cells and activated T cells. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of MMR status and quantification of PD-L1 expression in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS FNB) specimens. Immunochemistry (IHC) was performed on consecutive archived treatment-naïve formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded EUS-FNB samples. The specimens were considered to have PD-L1 expression if PD-L1 was expressed in ≥1% of tumor cells and a high level of expression if ≥50%. Tumors with absent nuclear staining of DNA mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2) were classified as dMMR. A total of 28 treatment-naïve patients who underwent EUS-FNB and had a final diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were included in the study. All the EUS-FNB samples were adequate for the evaluation of MMR and PD-L1 expression. None of the patients with PDAC included in the study had a dMMR tumor. PD-L1 expression was identified in 39% of the cohort (n = 11). Expression thresholds of ≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50% in tumor cells were identified in 11 (39%), 4 (14%), and 1 (4%) patients, respectively. The evaluation of MMR status and PD-L1 can be successfully performed on EUS-FNB pancreatic specimens. Furthermore, MMR expression failed to show utility in recognizing immunotherapy vulnerability in pancreatic cancer; the only recommendation for testing remains for patients with heritable cancers. Meanwhile high PD-L1 expression was correlated with poor prognosis. This association may identify a subgroup of patients where immune checkpoints inhibitors could provide therapeutic benefits, spotlighting the role of EUS-FNB in the field of immune-oncology.

Diagnostic Utility of the PD-L1 Immunostaining in Biopsy Specimens of Patients with Biliary Tract Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1) antibodies have been successfully used as treatment agents for several solid tumors; however, it is difficult to predict their effectiveness. We evaluated whether biopsy specimens could predict the positive status of PD-L1 in surgically resected tissue.

METHODS

Among 91 patients who underwent tissue sampling with endoscopic or liver biopsy before surgery for biliary tract neoplasms in an academic center, 45 (49%) patients were selected for retrospective analysis because the quality and quantity of their biopsy specimens were adequate for histologic evaluation. We performed immunohistochemical staining to investigate the PD-L1 expression in both resected and biopsy specimens. The percentage of the positively stained cells was calculated for subsequent use in the correlation investigation.

RESULTS

The biopsy methods were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 28 cases, percutaneous liver biopsy in 10 cases, and endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration in 7 cases. Among the 45 patients, when patients with > 10% positive tumor cells in surgically resected tissues were regarded as truly positive PD-L1, the positive and negative concordance rates between surgically resected tissues and biopsy samples were 56% (5/9) and 100% (36/36), respectively. With regard to the use of preoperative biopsy as a diagnostic tool, all (5/5) PD-L1-positive patients had a positive resected specimen. The accuracy of each biopsy method was as follows: ERCP, 89% (25/28); fine-needle aspiration, 86% (6/7); and liver biopsy, 100% (10/10).

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsy samples could be a surrogate material for the assessment of the PD-L1 expression with substantial positive and high negative concordance rates.

PD-L1 expression and surgical outcomes of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas in a single-centre study of 56 lesions

OBJECTIVE

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a rare histologic subtype of pancreatic carcinoma. The clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of ASCP are poorly understood due to the rarity of this disease. Recently, promising clinical responses in patients with pancreatic cancer have been obtained for antibodies against programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1). This study investigated the prevalence of PD-L1 expression and surgical outcomes of 56 ASCPs compared to 100 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs).

METHODS

A total of 56 resected cases of ASCPs were retrospectively reviewed; after matching for the T category, 100 PDACs were selected as a control group for comparison. Immunohistochemistry for p53, Smad4, and PD-L1 was performed in both groups.

RESULTS

The ASCPs exhibited distinct clinicopathologic features, such as larger tumour, location in the distal pancreas, frequent vascular invasion and distant metastasis. In survival analysis, 1-and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 51.8% and 17.9%, respectively, with a median follow-up 13 months. According to multivariate analysis, vascular invasion and T category remained independent predictors of OS. Patients with ASCPs showed poorer survival than patients with PDACs after matching for the T category (p = 0.03). p53 and Smad4 were aberrantly expressed in 42 (75%) and 28 (50%) cases, respectively. Under the condition of a 10% cut-off value for PD-L1 positivity, approximately 11% of ASCPs were positive for PD-L1.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 11% of patients with ASCPs are assumed to be potential candidates for the application of antibodies against PD-1/PD-L1, as based on the immunohistochemical results for PD-L1.

Heterogeneous programmed death-ligand 1 expression in gastric cancer: comparison of tissue microarrays and whole sections

Background

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression determines the eligibility for anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer, but evidence indicates that PD-L1 staining is heterogeneous. Patients who are ineligible for radical surgery could be tested for PD-L1 expression with biopsy staining, but it is unclear if a small biopsy is representative of the PD-L1 status of the whole tumor. The aim of our study was to determine how many biopsy specimens are needed to accurately reflect the objective status of PD-L1 expression in whole sections.

Methods

We built tissue microarrays (TMAs) as substitutes for core biopsies, collecting 6 cores per case from 152 gastric cancer specimens. All of the slides and TMAs underwent PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining, and PD-L1 expression in at least 1% of tumor cells or immune cells was defined as positive.

Results

It was necessary to randomly select multiple cores from TMAs to reach a suitable agreement rate (> 90%) and Cohen’s κ value (> 0.8) between TMAs and whole sections. We defined the PD-L1 staining status from the whole section as the standard. The evaluation of five randomly selected cores from TMAs agreed well with the evaluation of whole sections. The sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) were 0.93, 0.92, and 0.922 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.863–0.982), respectively.

Conclusions

We conclude that PD-L1 expression among TMA samples had different degrees of relevance to the corresponding surgical specimens, which indicates that at least five biopsies might be necessary to characterize patients taking anti-PD-1 treatment.