Successful relief of hip joint pain by percutaneous radiofrequency nerve thermocoagulation in a patient with contraindications for hip arthroplasty

Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Hip Pain: A Comprehensive, Narrative Review

Chronic hip pain can be treated with physical therapy, oral medications, injections, and, definitively, total hip arthroplasty. Enough patients have contraindications to and refractory pain even after total hip arthroplasty, that there is a need to develop alternative managements for this disabling condition. This article examines the state of hip radiofrequency ablation literature including relevant anatomy, patient selection, and treatment outcomes.

Therapeutic exercise and radiofrequency in the rehabilitation project for hip osteoarthritis pain

BACKGROUND

Severe hip osteoarthritis is responsible for disabling pain and functional impairment of the joint. Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment, some patients have multiple comorbidities that represent contraindications for THA. Conventional drug therapies are often ineffective or responsible for numerous side effects. For these patients, it is difficult to draw up an acceptable rehabilitation path, as the main limitation is intense pain. New rehabilitation strategies that relieve pain and improve articular function need to be developed. The combination of traditional treatments such as education and therapeutic exercise with innovative, minimally-invasive therapies such as continuous radiofrequency (CRF) appears to reduce hip pain by determining the neurolysis of the joint.

AIM

The aim of our study was to describe the reduction in pain and improvements in joint function when CRF is combined with the therapeutic exercise in rehabilitation of patients with severe hip osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

Case series study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation service outpatients.

POPULATION

Twenty-five patients with severe hip osteoarthritis causing disabling pain and with contraindications to THA, and for whom conventional drug therapies were ineffective or responsible for numerous side effects.

METHODS

The study design included: initial clinical-functional assessment using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); a pre-lesion anaesthetic block; hip neuroablation with CRF; a three-week kinesitherapy protocol (3 sessions per week); two further assessments using the same scales one month (T1) and six months (T2) after CRF.

RESULTS

Improvements at T1 and T2 follow-ups, after CRF (P=0.000) were recorded for articular pain and function. However, results at T2 were worse than those at T1 (P=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

CRF combined with therapeutic exercise in rehabilitation of severe hip osteoarthritis is an attractive option for significant pain relief as it allows patients to carry out kinesitherapy more easily.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

CRF could represent a valid alternative in the rehabilitation of patients with severe hip osteoarthritis especially when other therapeutic approaches are unworkable.

Our experience in the application of radiofrequency neuroablation in patients with coxalgia against the background of degenerative osteoarthrosis of the hip joint

The article is concerned with the treatment of coxalgia against the background of degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the hip joint. The author carried out an analysis of foreign studies concerning with the application of radiofrequency neural ablation for the hip joint nerves. Based on the results of our own research, the author has proved that radiofrequency neuroablation of articular nervule of obturator and femoral nerves is an effective treatment of coxalgia pain syndrome against the background of degenerative osteoarthrosis

Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain

Purpose

Chronic hip pain is a common symptom experienced by many people. Often, surgery is not an option for patients with multiple comorbidities, and conventional drugs either have many side effects or are ineffective. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a new method in the treatment of pain. We attempt to compare the efficacy of PRF relative to conservative management for chronic hip pain.

RPatients and methods

Between August 2011 and July 2013, 29 patients with chronic hip pain were divided into two groups (PRF and conservative treatment) according to consent or refusal to undergo PRF procedure. Fifteen patients received PRF of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves, and 14 patients received conservative treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oxford hip scores (OHS), and pain medications were used for outcome measurement before treatment and at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment.

Results

At 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment initiation, improvements in VAS were significantly greater with PRF. Improvements in OHS were significantly greater in the PRF group at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. Patients in the PRF group also used less pain medications. Eight subjects in the conservative treatment group switched to the PRF group after 12 weeks, and six of them had >50% improvement.

Conclusion

When compared with conservative treatment, PRF of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves offers greater pain relief for chronic hip pain and can augment physical functioning.

Percutaneous radiofrequency denervation in patients with contraindications for total hip arthroplasty

Multiple comorbidities sometimes represent a contraindication for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Major symptoms of patients with hip pain include groin, thigh, and trochanteric pain. Groin and thigh pain arise from sensory branches of the obturator nerve, whereas trochanteric pain arises from sensory branches of the femoral nerve. Between January 2009 and October 2010, eighteen patients with chronic hip pain with several contraindications for THA were selected for a prospective study. Predenervation diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 16 patients and prolonged postoperative hip pain in 2 (1 THA, 1 Girdlestone). Hip joint pain was treated by percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning of the sensory branches of the obturator and femoral nerves. Six-month follow-up data revealed a statistically significant decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and a statistically significant increase of Harris Hip Score. Before radiofrequency and at 6-month follow-up, mean VAS scores were 9.52 (range, 7-10; standard deviation [SD], 0.79) and 6.35 (range, 3-10; SD, 2.17), respectively; mean Harris Hip Scores were 28.64 (range, 19-41; SD, 6.98) and 43.88 (range, 23-71; SD, 16.38), respectively; and mean WOMAC scores were 75.70 (range, 92-59; SD, 9.70) and 63.70 (range, 78-44; SD, 11.37), respectively. All values were statistically significant (P<.05) for Student's t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Eight patients reported ≥50% pain relief at 6-month follow-up. No side effects were reported. Use of this technique for hip pain control is controversial. In our experience, percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning of the sensory branches of the nerves innervating the hip joint can be an option for patients with intractable hip joint pain.

Percutaneous radiofrequency treatment for refractory anteromedial pain of osteoarthritic knees

OBJECTIVE

Although severe knee osteoarthritis with refractory pain is commonly treated surgically, this is often not an option for patients with poor health status or unwillingness to undergo major surgery. We examined the efficacy of radiofrequency application to sensory nerves as a novel alternative treatment for refractory knee pain.

METHODS

This study was an open-label, nonrandomized, and controlled study. Patients complaining of refractory anteromedial knee pain associated with radiological osteoarthritis (moderate or severe) were included. They were assigned to one of two groups: those receiving radiofrequency thermocoagulation (N = 18) or those receiving nerve block (N = 17), depending on the time period that they were referred to the clinic. Radiofrequency current or local anesthetics was applied to the medial retinacular nerve and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Western Ontario McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index score, pain visual analog scale (VAS), and patient's global assessment were assessed with a minimum follow-up of 6 months.

RESULTS

  Radiofrequency treatment significantly decreased knee pain as measured by VAS for 12 weeks compared with the control group. In terms of responders, more patients in the RF group responded to the treatment than in the control group. The differences were statistically significant at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks in pain VAS. Eight patients (44%) treated with radiofrequency rated excellent or good but only three (18%) in the control group rated good, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Some patients were able to benefit substantially from radiofrequency treatment. Even if its effective period is limited, radiofrequency application is a promising treatment to alleviate refractory anteromedial knee pain with osteoarthritis. Further experience and technical improvements are needed to establish its role in the management of knee osteoarthritis.