The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study

A rig for in vitro testing of the lumbar spine and pelvis simulating posterior, anterior and oblique trunk muscles

Numerous research questions require in vitro testing on lumbar spine and pelvis specimens. The majority of test setups apply forces and torques via the uppermost vertebral body with the lowermost vertebral body fixed and have been validated for kinematics and intradiscal pressure. Models without simulation of muscle traction may produce valid data only for testing conditions for which they have been validated. In vitro test setups with simulation of muscle traction would appear to be useful for conditions beyond such conditions. The aim of the present study was to describe and validate a test rig for the lumbar spine that applies the forces directly to the vertebral bodies via artificial muscle attachments and thus includes the stabilising effects of the muscles known from the literature. The artificial muscle attachments were chosen to get a stable fixation of the pulleys on the cadaver. The location of force application was as close as possible to the physiological footprint of the muscle on the bone. Three paired muscles were combined by individual linear actuators and simulated under force control (posterior, anterior and oblique trunk muscles). An optical 3D motion capture system (GOM, Zeiss, Germany) was used to measure the reposition of the entire lumbar spine and the sacrum against the ilium. At the same time, the force applied to all simulated muscles was recorded. All muscle attachments could be loaded up to a maximum force of 1 kN without failure. The following reposition of the lumbar spine could be generated by the simulated muscle traction keeping the force below each muscle's individual strength: extension 18°, flexion 27°, lateral bending 33°, axial rotation 11°. The effects on lumbar spine reposition of the individual trunk muscles differed depending on the direction of movement. The anterior trunk muscles were the most acting for flexion/extension, at 0.16 ± 0.06°/N, while the oblique trunk muscles were the most acting for lateral bending (0.17 ± 0.16°/N) and axial rotation (0.10 ± 0.14°/N). The maximum nutation of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was on average 1,2° ± 0,2°. The artificial muscle attachments to the vertebral bodies proved to be withstand physiologically occurring forces. The range of motion generated in the test rig was physiological. The SIJ nutation determined and the direction of action of the muscle groups correspond to literature data. The order of the individual muscle effects on lumbar spine reposition corresponds to the distance between the muscle insertions and the physiological centre of rotation. In conclusion, taking into account the limitations, the lumbar spine test rig presented here allows the analysis of movements of the lumbar spine and pelvis resulting directly from simulated muscle tractions and thus enables a test environment close to in vivo conditions.

An OLIF Cage Integrated with a Low-Profile Plate and Cross Screws Could Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Complications Biomechanically

BACKGROUND

Stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) cannot provide credible postoperative stability; additional fixation devices (AFDs) have been used to optimize surgical segment stability. Anterior lateral single rod (ALSR) screw fixation can be performed without intraoperative body position changes and additional surgical incisions, but its biomechanical defect may trigger complications. Inspired by the cross screw in other fixation devices, we designed an OLIF cage integrated with a low-profile plate and cross screw (LPCS).

METHODS

This study was designed to investigate whether the biomechanical performance of the LPCS OLIF cage is better than that of OLIF with ALSR fixation. The pullout and bending strength of the newly designed conical screw were tested by comparing it with a clinically used cylindrical screw. Different directional fixation strengths of the LPCS OLIF cage were tested by comparing the failure moment and stiffness with the ALSR fixation model. To test the fixation stability and potential risk for screw loosening in models with LPCS OLIF, we also compared the surgical segment's range of motions (ROMs) and stress distributions on OLIF models without and with different AFD fixation under physiological loading conditions.

RESULTS

The bending and pullout strength of the conical screw was better than that of the clinically used screw, and the failure moment and stiffness of the LPCS OLIF model were higher than those of the ALSR model, especially under the extension loading conditions. In which, the maximum failure moment of ALSR fixed OLIF model was 0.88 Nm and 0.76 Nm, while that of the LPCS OLIF model was 9.79 Nm and 7.48 Nm in models with normal and osteoporotic BMD, respectively. Compared to the ALSR fixed OLIF model, failure moment of LPCS models increased by 1012.5% and 884.21% in normal and osteoporotic models, respectively. Moreover, under most physiological loading conditions, the ROM and stress values of the LPCS OLIF model were lower than those of the ALSR model and even slightly lower than those of the OLIF model with bilateral pedicle screw fixation under limited loading conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to OLIF with ALSR fixation, the newly developed LPCS OLIF cage demonstrates inherent biomechanical advantages in establishing immediate postoperative stability and reducing complications related to stress concentration. However, the conclusions of current research should still be validated through in vitro mechanical tests and clinical trials.

Posterior Ligamentum Complex Preservation Alleviate ASD-Related Biomechanical Deterioration in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Models: A Finite Element Analysis

Background

There are differences in the extent of excision of articular processes, spinal processes and posterior ligamentum complexes (PLC) for posterior approach lumbar interbody fusion. Given that the biomechanical significance of these structures has been verified and that deterioration of the biomechanical environment is the main trigger for complications in both fused and adjacent motion segments, changes in decompression ranges may affect the potential risk of adjacent segmental disease (ASD) biomechanically; however, this topic has yet to be identified.

Methods

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with different decompression strategies was simulated in a well-validated lumbosacral model. The excision and preservation of the cranial motion of the segmental PLC and the lateral articular process in the fusion segment were simulated in this model. The stress distribution in the cranial motion segment was computed under different loading conditions to determine the potential risk of ASD.

Results

Compared to complete bilateral articular process excision, preservation of the lateral two-thirds of the articular process did not alleviate stress concentration on the cranial motion segment both in PLC preserved and excised models. In contrast, preservation of the cranial segmental PLC can obviously alleviate the stress concentration tendency of the cranial intervertebral disc under flexion loading conditions.

Conclusion

Preservation of the lateral parts of the articular process cannot optimize the biomechanical environment, in contrast, PLC preservation can effectively alleviate ASD related biomechanical deterioration of the cranium segment.

Contact between leaked cement and adjacent vertebral endplate induces a greater risk of adjacent vertebral fracture with vertebral bone cement augmentation biomechanically

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) is a frequently observed complication after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture (OVCF). Studies have demonstrated that intervertebral cement leakage (ICL) can increase the incidence of AVF, but others have reached opposite conclusions. The stress concentration initially increases the risk of AVF, and dispersive concentrated stress is the main biomechanical function of the intervertebral disc (IVD).

PURPOSE

This study was designed to validate the hypothesis that direct contact between the leaked cement and adjacent bony endplate (BEP) can inhibit this biomechanical function, trigger adjacent vertebral stress concentration and increase the risk of AVF.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study and corresponding numerical mechanical simulations.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Clinical data from 97 OVCF patients treated by bone cement augmentation operations were reviewed in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical assessments involved measuring ICL and cement-BEP contact status in patients with and without AVF. Numerical simulations were conducted to compute stress values in adjacent vertebral body's BEP and cancellous bone under various body positions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiographic and demographic data of 97 OVCF patients (with an average follow-up period of 11.5 months) treated using bone cement augmentation operation were reviewed in the present study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with AVF and those without AVF. Bone cement leakage status was judged via 2 different methods: with or without IVD cement leakage and with and without adjacent vertebral endplate contact. The data from patients with and without AVF were compared, and the independent risk factors were identified through regression analysis. Patients without IVD cement leakage, with IVD cement leakage but without adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact, and with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact were simulated using a previously constructed and validated lumbar finite element model, and the biomechanical indicators related to the AVF were computed and recorded in these surgical models.

RESULTS

Radiographic analysis revealed that the incidence of AVF was numerically higher, but was not significantly higher in patients with IVD cement leakage. In contrast, patients with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact had a significantly greater incidence of AVF, which has also been proven to be an independent risk factor for AVF. In addition, numerical mechanical simulations revealed an obvious stress concentration tendency (the higher maximum equivalent stress value) in the adjacent vertebral body in the model with endplate cement contact.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact induces a greater risk of AVF through deterioration of the local biomechanical environment. Cement injection, therefore, should be terminated when IVD cement leakage occurs to reduce adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact and reduce the resulting risk of AVF biomechanics.

Extending the intermedullary nail will not reduce the potential risk of femoral head varus in PFNA patients biomechanically: a clinical review and corresponding numerical simulation

Femoral head varus is an important complication in intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) fixation. Theoretically, extending the length of the intramedullary nail could optimize fixation stability by lengthening the force arm. However, whether extending the nail length can optimize patient prognosis is unclear. In this study, a review of imaging data from intertrochanteric fracture patients with PFNA fixation was performed, and the length of the intramedullary nail in the femoral trunk and the distance between the lesser trochanter and the distal locking screw were measured. The femoral neck varus status was judged at the 6-month follow-up. The correlation coefficients between nail length and femoral neck varus angle were computed, and linear regression analysis was used to determine whether a change in nail length was an independent risk factor for femoral neck varus. Moreover, the biomechanical effects of different nail lengths on PFNA fixation stability and local stress distribution have also been verified by numerical mechanical simulations. Clinical review revealed that changes in nail length were not significantly correlated with femoral head varus and were also not an independent risk factor for this complication. In addition, only slight biomechanical changes can be observed in the numerical simulation results. Therefore, commonly used intramedullary nails should be able to meet the needs of PFNA-fixed patients, and additional procedures for longer nail insertion may be unnecessary.

IVD fibrosis and disc collapse comprehensively aggravate vertebral body disuse osteoporosis and zygapophyseal joint osteoarthritis by posteriorly shifting the load transmission pattern

BACKGROUND

Disuse is a typical phenotype of osteoporosis, but the underlying mechanism has yet to be identified in elderly patients. Disc collapse and intervertebral disc (IVD) fibrosis are two main pathological changes in IVD degeneration (IDD) progression, given that these changes affect load transmission patterns, which may lead to disuse osteoporosis of vertebral bodies and zygapophyseal joint (ZJ) osteoarthritis (ZJOA) biomechanically.

METHODS

Clinical data from 59 patients were collected retrospectively. Patient vertebral bony density, ZJOA grade, and disc collapse status were judged via CT. The IVD fibrosis grade was determined based on the FA measurements. Regression analyses identified potential independent risk factors for osteoporosis and ZJOA. L4-L5 numerical models with and without disc collapse and IVD fibrosis were constructed; stress distributions on the bony endplate (BEP) and zygapophyseal joint (ZJ) cartilages were computed in models with and without disc collapse and IVD fibrosis.

RESULTS

A significantly lower disc height ratio and significantly greater FA were recorded in patients with ZJOA. A significant correlation was observed between lower HU values and two parameters related to IDD progression. These factors were also proven to be independent risk factors for both osteoporosis and ZJOA. Correspondingly, compared to the intact model without IDD. Lower stress on vertebral bodies and greater stress on ZJOA can be simultaneously recorded in models of disc collapse and IVD fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

IVD fibrosis and disc collapse simultaneously aggravate vertebral body disuse osteoporosis and ZJOA by posteriorly shifting the load transmission pattern.

Intraoperative capsule protection can reduce the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration acceleration biomechanically: an in silico study

BACKGROUND

The capsule of the zygapophyseal joint plays an important role in motion segmental stability maintenance. Iatrogenic capsule injury is a common phenomenon in posterior approach lumbar interbody fusion operations, but whether this procedure will cause a higher risk of adjacent segment degeneration acceleration biomechanically has yet to be identified.

METHODS

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with different grades of iatrogenic capsule injury was simulated in our calibrated and validated numerical model. By adjusting the cross-sectional area of the capsule, different grades of capsule injury were simulated. The stress distribution on the cranial motion segment was computed under different loading conditions to judge the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration acceleration.

RESULTS

Compared to the PLIF model with an intact capsule, a stepwise increase in the stress value on the cranial motion segment can be observed with a step decrease in capsule cross-sectional areas. Moreover, compared to the difference between models with intact and slightly injured capsules, the difference in stress values was more evident between models with slight and severe iatrogenic capsule injury.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative capsule protection can reduce the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration acceleration biomechanically, and iatrogenic capsule damage on the cranial motion segment should be reduced to optimize patients' long-term prognosis.

The cranial vertebral body suffers a higher risk of adjacent vertebral fracture due to the poor biomechanical environment in patients with percutaneous vertebralplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF), a frequent complication of PVP, is influenced by factors such as osteoporosis progression, increased intervertebral cement leakage (ICL), and biomechanical deterioration. Notably, the risk of AVF is notably elevated in the cranial vertebral body compared with the caudal counterpart. Despite this knowledge, the underlying pathological mechanism remains elusive.

PURPOSE

This study delves into the role of biomechanical deterioration as a pivotal factor in the heightened risk of AVF in the cranial vertebral body following PVP. By isolating this variable, we aim to unravel its prominence relative to other potential risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study and corresponding numerical mechanical simulations.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Clinical data from 101 patients treated by PVP were reviewed in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical assessments involved measuring Hounsfield unit (HU) values of adjacent vertebral bodies as a representation of patients' bone mineral density (BMD). Additionally, the rates of ICL were compared among these patients. Numerical simulations were conducted to compute stress values in the cranial and caudal vertebral bodies under various body positions.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of PVP patients spanning July 2016 to August 2019, we scrutinized the HU values of adjacent vertebral bodies to discern disparities in BMD between cranial and caudal regions. Additionally, we compared ICL rates on both cranial and caudal sides. To augment our investigation, well-validated numerical models simulated the PVP procedure, enabling the computation of maximum stress values in cranial and caudal vertebral bodies across varying body positions.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of cranial AVF was significantly higher than the caudal side. No notable distinctions in HU values or ICL rates were observed between the cranial and caudal sides. The incidence of AVF showed no significant elevation in patients with ICL in either region. However, numerical simulations unveiled heightened stress values in the cranial vertebral body.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients postPVP, the cranial vertebral body faces a heightened risk of AVF, primarily attributed to biomechanical deterioration rather than lower BMD or an elevated ICL rate.

Annulus Calibration Increases the Computational Accuracy of the Lumbar Finite Element Model

STUDY DESIGN

Mechanical simulations.

OBJECTIVE

Inadequate calibration of annuli negatively affects the computational accuracy of finite element (FE) models. Specifically, the definition of annulus average radius (AR) does not have uniformity standards. Differences between the elastic moduli in the different layers and parts of the annulus were not fully calibrated when a linear elastic material is used to define its material properties. This study aims to optimize the computational accuracy of the FE model by calibrating the annulus.

METHODS

We calibrated the annulus AR and elastic modulus in our anterior-constructed lumbar model by eliminating the difference between the computed range of motion and that measured by in vitro studies under a flexion-extension loading condition. Multi-indicator validation was performed by comparing the computed indicators with those measured in in vitro studies. The computation time required for the different models has also been recorded to evaluate the computational efficiency.

RESULTS

The difference between computed and measured ROMs was less than 1% when the annulus AR and elastic modulus were calibrated. In the model validation process, all the indicators computed by the calibrated FE model were within ±1 standard deviation of the average values obtained from in vitro studies. The maximum difference between the computed and measured values was less than 10% under nearly all loading conditions. There is no apparent variation tendency for the computational time associated with different models.

CONCLUSION

The FE model with calibrated annulus AR and regional elastic modulus has higher computational accuracy and can be used in subsequent mechanical studies.

Fixation-induced surgical segment's high stiffness and the damage of posterior structures together trigger a higher risk of adjacent segment disease in patients with lumbar interbody fusion operations

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a commonly reported complication after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF); changes in the mechanical environment play an essential role in the generation of ASD. Traditionally, fixation-induced high stiffness in the surgical segment was the main reason for ASD. However, with more attention paid to the biomechanical significance of posterior bony and soft structures, surgeons hypothesize that this factor may also play an important role in ASD.

METHODS

Oblique and posterior LIF operations have been simulated in this study. The stand-alone OLIF and OLIF fixed by bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) system have been simulated. The spinal process (the attachment point of cranial ligamentum complex) was excised in the PLIF model; the BPS system has also been used in the PLIF model. Stress values related to ASD have been computed under physiological body positions, including flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotations.

RESULTS

Compared to the stand-alone OLIF model, the OLIF model with BPS fixation suffers higher stress values under extension body position. However, there are no apparent differences under other loading conditions. Moreover, significant increases in stress values can be recorded in flexion and extension loading conditions in the PLIF model with posterior structures damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation-induced surgical segment's high stiffness and the damage of posterior soft tissues together trigger a higher risk of ASD in patients with LIF operations. Optimizing BPS fixation methods and pedicle screw designs and reducing the range of posterior structures excision may be an effective method to reduce the risk of ASD.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options for Adjacent Segment Degeneration: A Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a common phenomenon after lumbar fusion. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) may provide an alternative treatment method for ASD. This study used finite element analysis to evaluate the biomechanical effects of LLIF with various fixation options and identify an optimal surgical strategy for ASD.

METHODS

A validated L1-S1 finite element model was modified for simulation. Six finite element models of the lumbar spine were created and were divided into group 1 (L4-5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion [PLIF] + L3-4 LLIF) and group 2 (L5-S1 PLIF + L4-5 LLIF). Each group consisted of 1) cage-alone, 2) cage + lateral screw fixation (LSF), and 3) cage + bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) models. The range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet loads of adjacent segments as well as interbody cage stress were analyzed.

RESULTS

The stress on the LLIF cage-superior endplate interface was highest in the cage-alone model followed by the cage + LSF model and cage + BPSF model. The increase in range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet loads at the adjacent segment was highest in the cage + BPSF model followed by the cage + LSF model and cage-alone model. However, the biomechanical effect on the adjacent segment seemed similar in the cage-alone and cage + LSF models.

CONCLUSIONS

LLIF with BPSF is recommended when performing LLIF surgery for ASD after L4-5 and L5-S1 PLIF. Considering cage subsidence and biomechanical effects on the adjacent segment, LLIF with LSF may be a suboptimal option for ASD surgery.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel intervertebral disc repair technique for large box-shaped ruptures

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the feasibility of repairing a ruptured intervertebral disc using a patch secured to the inner surface of the annulus fibrosus (AF). Different material properties and geometries for the patch were evaluated. Methods: Using finite element analysis, this study created a large box-shaped rupture in the posterior-lateral region of the AF and then repaired it with a circular and square inner patch. The elastic modulus of the patches ranged from 1 to 50 MPa to determine the effect on the nucleus pulposus (NP) pressure, vertical displacement, disc bulge, AF stress, segmental range of motion (ROM), patch stress, and suture stress. The results were compared against the intact spine to determine the most suitable shape and properties for the repair patch. Results: The intervertebral height and ROM of the repaired lumbar spine was similar to the intact spine and was independent of the patch material properties and geometry. The patches with a modulus of 2-3 MPa resulted in an NP pressure and AF stresses closest to the healthy disc, and produced minimal contact pressure on the cleft surfaces and minimal stress on the suture and patch of all models. Circular patches caused lower NP pressure, AF stress and patch stress than the square patch, but also caused greater stress on the suture. Conclusion: A circular patch with an elastic modulus of 2-3 MPa secured to the inner region of the ruptured annulus fibrosus was able to immediately close the rupture and maintain an NP pressure and AF stress similar to the intact intervertebral disc. This patch had the lowest risk of complications and produced the greatest restorative effect of all patches simulated in this study.

Will the adjustment of insertional pedicle screw positions affect the risk of adjacent segment diseases biomechanically? An in-silico study

Background

The fixation-induced biomechanical deterioration will increase the risk of adjacent segment diseases (ASD) after lumbar interbody fusion with Bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation. The accurate adjustment of insertional pedicle screw positions is possible, and published studies have reported its mechanical effects. However, no studies clarified that adjusting insertional screw positions would affect the postoperative biomechanical environment and the risk of ASD. The objective of this study was to identify this issue and provide theoretical references for the optimization of insertional pedicle screw position selections.

Methods

The oblique lumbar interbody fusion fixed by BPS with different insertional positions has been simulated in the L4-L5 segment of our previously constructed and validated lumbosacral model. Biomechanical indicators related to ASD have been computed and recorded under flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotation loading conditions.

Results

The change of screw insertional positions has more apparent biomechanical effects on the cranial than the caudal segment. Positive collections can be observed between the reduction of the fixation length and the alleviation of motility compensation and stress concentration on facet cartilages. By contrast, no pronounced tendency of stress distribution on the intervertebral discs can be observed with the change of screw positions.

Conclusions

Reducing the fixation stiffness by adjusting the insertional screw positions could alleviate the biomechanical deterioration and be an effective method to reduce the risk of ASD caused by BPS.

Deterioration of the fixation segment's stress distribution and the strength reduction of screw holding position together cause screw loosening in ALSR fixed OLIF patients with poor BMD

The vertebral body's Hounsfield unit (HU) value can credibly reflect patients' bone mineral density (BMD). Given that poor bone-screw integration initially triggers screw loosening and regional differences in BMD and strength in the vertebral body exist, HU in screw holding planes should better predict screw loosening. According to the stress shielding effect, the stress distribution changes in the fixation segment with BMD reduction should be related to screw loosening, but this has not been identified. We retrospectively collected the radiographic and demographic data of 56 patients treated by single-level oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with anterior lateral single rod (ALSR) screw fixation. BMD was identified by measuring HU values in vertebral bodies and screw holding planes. Regression analyses identified independent risk factors for cranial and caudal screw loosening separately. Meanwhile, OLIF with ALSR fixation was numerically simulated; the elastic modulus of bony structures was adjusted to simulate different grades of BMD reduction. Stress distribution changes were judged by computing stress distribution in screws, bone-screw interfaces, and cancellous bones in the fixation segment. The results showed that HU reduction in vertebral bodies and screw holding planes were independent risk factors for screw loosening. The predictive performance of screw holding plane HU is better than the mean HU of vertebral bodies. Cranial screws suffer a higher risk of screw loosening, but HU was not significantly different between cranial and caudal sides. The poor BMD led to stress concentrations on both the screw and bone-screw interfaces. Biomechanical deterioration was more severe in the cranial screws than in the caudal screws. Additionally, lower stress can also be observed in fixation segments' cancellous bone. Therefore, a higher proportion of ALSR load transmission triggers stress concentration on the screw and bone-screw interfaces in patients with poor BMD. This, together with decreased bony strength in the screw holding position, contributes to screw loosening in osteoporotic patients biomechanically. The trajectory optimization of ALSR screws based on preoperative HU measurement and regular anti-osteoporosis therapy may effectively reduce the risk of screw loosening.

Biomechanical Comparison between Isobar and Dynamic-Transitional Optima (DTO) Hybrid Lumbar Fixators: A Lumbosacral Finite Element and Intersegmental Motion Analysis

Biomechanical performance of longitudinal component in dynamic hybrid devices was evaluated to display the load-transfer effects of Dynesys cord spacer or Isobar damper-joint dynamic stabilizer on junctional problem based on various disc degenerations. The dynamic component was adapted at the mildly degenerative L3–L4 segment, and the static component was fixed at the moderately degenerative L4–L5 segment under a displacement-controlled mode for the finite element study. Furthermore, an intersegmental motion behavior was analyzed experimentally on the synthetic model under a load-controlled mode. Isobar or DTO hybrid fixator could reduce stress/motion at transition segment, but compensation was affected at the cephalic adjacent segment more than the caudal one. Within the trade-off region (as a motion-preserving balance between the transition and adjacent segments), the stiffness-related problem was reduced mostly in flexion by a flexible Dynesys cord. In contrast, Isobar damper afforded the effect of maximal allowable displacement (more than peak axial stiffness) to reduce stress within the pedicle and at facet joint. Pedicle-screw travel at transition level was related to the extent of disc degeneration in Isobar damper-joint (more than Dynesys cord spacer) attributing to the design effect of axial displacement and angular rotation under motion. In biomechanical characteristics relevant to clinical use, longitudinal cord/damper of dynamic hybrid lumbar fixators should be designed with less interface stress occurring at the screw-vertebral junction and facet joint to decrease pedicle screw loosening/breakage under various disc degenerations.

The effects of pre-stressed rods contoured by different bending techniques on posterior instrumentation of L4-L5 lumbar spine segment: A finite element study

Posterior pedicle screw instrumentation (PPSI) is a well-known method in lumbar spine surgery. Understanding how PPSI affects the biomechanics of the lumbar spine is an important issue. In particular, during PPSI operations, surgeons bend rods according to the patients’ spinal curvatures based on their own experiences. As a result, residual stresses develop on the rods due to this bending. Although many finite element-based biomechanical studies have been performed for PPSI, studies comparing the effects of residual stresses arising from rod contouring on the construct stresses are lacking. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of residual stress in PPSI using rods contoured with a French bender and an in-situ bender, as well as comparing the differences in stress increment with straight and contoured rods for different physiological motions. Accordingly, a finite element (FE) model of the L4-L5 lumbar spine segment was developed for PPSI and the effects of residual stresses on rods were investigated by using different bending methods. In the simulations, it was found that rods contoured with a French bender with residual stress resulted in significantly more increased stress in PPSI compared to those contoured with an in-situ bender. The results of this study emphasize that increased stress in PPSI due to the residual stresses for different physiological motions may increase the risk of PPSI failures. Additionally, the finite element modeling approach employed here could be used as a fundamental tool for further investigations of topics such as PPSI fatigue life and failure studies.

Efficacy of the Dynesys Hybrid Surgery for Patients with Multi-Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Objective

The efficacy of hybrid (Dynesys and fusion) surgery and the traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery was compared in patients with multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

Methods

A total of 68 patients with multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis subjected to surgery were recruited between January 2013 and October 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology. The patients were divided into a hybrid group (N = 33) and a TLIF group (N = 35) by surgery. After surgery, follow-up was conducted for 12 months. Between the two groups, the following parameters were compared: general conditions, clinical symptom scores, imaging parameters, and early complications.

Results

A statistically significant difference in the duration of surgery was noted between the two groups. After 12 months of follow-up, the range of motion disappeared in the TLIF group, while 63.53% was preserved in the hybrid group with statistically significant differences. A statistically significant difference was identified in the Oswestry Disability Index one week after surgery. Nonetheless, no statistically significant differences were observed at the 12-month post-surgical follow-up. Pfirrmann grade showed a 3.03% upper adjacent segment degeneration rate in the hybrid group (1/33) at 12-month follow-up and 2.86% (1/35) in the TLIF group. Notably, no early complications (screw loosening and wound infection) were identified in the two groups.

Conclusion

The Dynesys hybrid surgery combined the advantages of two systems of dynamic stabilization and rigid fusion. Besides, hybrid surgery is potentially a novel approach for the treatment of multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

Comparison of the susceptibility to implant failure in the lateral, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

There are several techniques for lumbar interbody fusion, and implant failure following lumbar interbody fusion can be troublesome. This study aimed to compare the stress in posterior implant and peri-screw vertebral bodies among lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to select the technique that is least likely to cause implant failure.

METHODS

We created an intact L3-L5 model and simulated the LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF techniques at L4-L5 using finite element methods. All models at the lower portion of L5 were fixed and imposed a preload of 400 N and a moment of 7.5 Nm on the upper portion of L3 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. We investigated the peak stresses and stress concentration in the posterior implant and peri-screw vertebral bodies for the LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF techniques.

RESULTS

The extension, flexion, bending, and rotation peak stresses and stress concentration in the posterior implant, and the peri-screw vertebral bodies, were the lowest in LLIF, followed by PLIF and TLIF, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It was found that implant failure was least likely to occur in LLIF, followed by PLIF and TLIF, respectively. Hence, surgeons should be aware of these factors when selecting an appropriate surgical technique and be careful for implant failure during postoperative follow-up.

The Mismatch Between Bony Endplates and Grafted Bone Increases Screw Loosening Risk for OLIF Patients With ALSR Fixation Biomechanically

The mismatch between bony endplates (BEPs) and grafted bone (GB) triggers several complications biomechanically. However, no published study has identified whether this factor increases the risk of screw loosening by deteriorating the local stress levels. This study aimed to illustrate the biomechanical effects of the mismatch between BEP and GB and the related risk of screw loosening. In this study, radiographic and demographic data of 56 patients treated by single segment oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with anterior lateral single rod (ALSR) fixation were collected retrospectively, and the match sufficiency between BEP and GB was measured and presented as the grafted bony occupancy rate (GBOR). Data in patients with and without screw loosening were compared; regression analyses identified independent risk factors. OLIF with different GBORs was simulated in a previously constructed and validated lumbosacral model, and biomechanical indicators related to screw loosening were computed in surgical models. The radiographic review and numerical simulations showed that the coronal plane’s GBOR was significantly lower in screw loosening patients both in the cranial and caudal vertebral bodies; the decrease in the coronal plane’s GBOR has been proven to be an independent risk factor for screw loosening. In addition, numerical mechanical simulations showed that the poor match between BEP and GB will lead to stress concentration on both screws and bone-screw interfaces. Therefore, we can conclude that the mismatch between the BEP and GB will increase the risk of screw loosening by deteriorating local stress levels, and the increase in the GBOR by modifying the OLIF cage’s design may be an effective method to optimize the patient’s prognosis.

Biomechanical Effects of Pedicle Screw Positioning on the Surgical Segment in Models After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An in-silico Study

Background

Bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) is the “gold standard” of fixation methods for patients with lumbar interbody fusion. Biomechanical deterioration initially triggers complications in the surgical segment. Studies proved that BPS positions and trajectory changes affect the local biomechanical environment. However, no study illustrates the biomechanical effect of insertional screw positions’ change on the surgical segment.

Methods

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with different BPS insertional positions has been simulated in a well-validated lumbo-sacral model. Fixation stability and stress responses on the surgical segment were evaluated under identical loading conditions.

Results

There is no clear variation tendency for the risk of BPS failure and the change of strain energy density of the grafted bone. However, shifting the insertional screw position close to the surgical segment will increase the range of motions (ROM) in the surgical segment and lead to stress concentration of bony structures, especially in the caudal side of the surgical segment.

Conclusion

Adjusting the insertional position of BPS close to the surgical segment in OLIF models will lead to stress concentration of bony structures and surgical segmental instability. Therefore, reducing BPS’s fixation length was not recommended, which may increase the risk of segmental instability, non-union, and cage subsidence.

Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Objective

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is the most common cause of sciatica after primary discectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transpedicular dynamic stabilization (TDS) combined with limited rediscectomy in the treatment of single-level RLDH.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 24 middle-aged patients who underwent TDS (Dynesys system) combined with limited rediscectomy (i.e., removing only extruded or loose disc fragments) for single-level Carragee type II and type IV RLDH between April 2012 and September 2017. Clinical results were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and low back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and complications. Imaging data include lumbar segment motion and intervertebral height.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 38 months. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up. The average range of motion (ROM) at the stabilized segment was 6.4° before surgery and 4.2° at the last follow-up, with a 78.6% mean preservation (P < 0.05). Intervertebral height at the stabilized segment decreased slightly after surgery (P < 0.05). However, there was no further decline at the last follow-up. There were no cases of reherniation, screw loosening, or segmental instability.

Conclusions

TDS combined with limited rediscectomy resulted in an effective procedure in middle-aged patients with Carragee type II and type IV RLDH. It was able to stabilize the operated segment with partial motion preservation. Moreover, it could maintain disc height and decrease the risk of recurrence in patients with a large posterior annular defect.

The biomechanical influence of facet joint parameters on corresponding segment in the lumbar spine: a new visualization method

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Facet joints have been discussed as influential factors in the development of lumbar degeneration, which includes disc herniation and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Facet orientation (FO) and facet tropism (FT) are two important structural parameters of the lumbar facet joints. Many previous studies have focused on single parameter analysis of the lumbar spine. Owing to the correlation between independent variables, single-factor analysis cannot reflect the interaction between variables; however, there has been no corresponding biomechanical method developed to address this problem.

PURPOSE

To investigate the complex biomechanical influences on the lumbar spine when vertebral FO and FT are varied using finite element analysis (FEA) and contour maps visualization, and analyze the biomechanical role of facet joint structural parameters in the process of lumbar degenerative diseases.

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical modelling, analysis, and verification study was performed.

METHODS

A three-dimensional non-linear FEA model of 3 denucleated intervertebral discs (L2-3, L3-4, L4-5) with adjacent vertebral bodies (L2-L5) was created. Previously performed in vitro experiments provided experimental data for the range of motion in each load direction that was used for calibration. For 12 lumbar models, different facet joint angles relative to the sagittal plane at both L3-4 facet joints were simulated for 35°≤FO≤50° and 0°≤FT≤15°. By modifying different values of FO and FT, FEA simulation of different lumbar spine models was performed. Contour maps were used to visualize the FO- and FT-relevant data.

RESULTS

Under flexion, extension, and torsion moments, facet joint contact force and intradiscal stress increased with increasing FT. In the condition where FT remained 0° and increasing FO values, facet joint contact force and intradiscal stress remained low with no apparent increasing or decreasing trend when the model was under flexion, extension, and torsion moments. In the condition where FO and the FT values were varied at the same time, the highest force and stress regions in the contour maps were observed when all three types of moments were applied. Stress distributions of the L3-4 disc with different FT and FO values showed disc stress increased significantly with increases of FT and was concentrated on the ipsilateral region of the facet joint with the more sagittal orientation.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of FO and FT has an important impact on the corresponding disc and facet joints, but FT played a more significant role. Moreover, disc stress was concentrated on the ipsilateral region of facet joint with greater sagittal orientation when FT existed. FT with high sagittal orientation may increase risk of recurrent LDH due to increase ipsilateral disc pressure.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

These biomechanical findings may help clinicians to understand the prognosis of some lumbar degenerative conditions.

Negative biomechanical effects of large grade nuclectomy in the transforaminal endoscopic discectomy increased the risk of adjacent segment diseases: A finite element study

PURPOSE

The protection of articular processes (AP) in the transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TED) was proven to optimise post-operative biomechanical environments. Published studies reported a large grade of nuclectomy leading to poor prognosis, but the underlying biomechanical mechanism was unclearly illustrated. This study aimed to investigate the changes of biomechanical environments after an in-out TED with intact AP and a large grade of nuclectomy and an out-in TED with limited foraminoplasty and a smaller grade of nuclectomy.

METHODS

A previously constructed and validated lumbo-sacral model was used in this study, and in-out TED with intact AP and out-in TED with limited foraminoplasty, a smaller grade of nuclectomy was simulated. Biomechanical changes in the L5-S1 segment related to the degeneration acceleration were computed under different directional loading conditions.

RESULTS

Post-operative biomechanical changes after the out-in TED with limited foraminoplasty were slight, except for the facet contact pressure under the extension position. By contrast, significant biomechanical deterioration, both in the adjacent disc and zygapophyseal joints, is observed under extension in the model after the in-out TED with large nuclectomy.

CONCLUSION

A large grade of nuclectomy is regarded as an independent risk factor of adjacent segment disease in the caudal functional spinal unit after the in-out TED.

Influence of posterior pedicle screw fixation at L4-L5 level on biomechanics of the lumbar spine with and without fusion: a finite element method

Background

Posterior pedicle screw (PS) fixation, a common treatment method for widespread low-back pain problems, has many uncertain aspects including stress concentration levels, effects on adjacent segments, and relationships with physiological motions. A better understanding of how posterior PS fixation affects the biomechanics of the lumbar spine is needed. For this purpose, a finite element (FE) model of a lumbar spine with posterior PS fixation at the L4–L5 segment level was developed by partially removing facet joints (FJs) to imitate an actual surgical procedure. This FE study aimed to investigate the influence of the posterior PS fixation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine before and after fusion by determining which physiological motions have the most increase in posterior instrumentation (PI) stresses and FJ loading.

Results

It was determined that posterior PS fixation increased FJ loading by approximately 35% and 23% at the L3–L4 adjacent level with extension and lateral bending motion, respectively. This increase in FJ loading at the adjacent level could point to the possibility that adjacent segment disease has developed or progressed after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Furthermore, analyses of peak von Mises stresses on PI showed that the maximum PI stresses of 272.1 MPa and 263.7 MPa occurred in lateral bending and flexion motion before fusion, respectively.

Conclusions

The effects of a posterior PS fixation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine before and after fusion were investigated for all physiological motions. This model could be used as a fundamental tool for further studies, providing a better understanding of the effects of posterior PS fixation by clearing up uncertain aspects.

Disc measurement and nucleus calibration in a smoothened lumbar model increases the accuracy and efficiency of in-silico study

Backgrounds

Finite element analysis (FEA) is an important tool during the spinal biomechanical study. Irregular surfaces in FEA models directly reconstructed based on imaging data may increase the computational burden and decrease the computational credibility. Definitions of the relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio do not conform to a uniform standard in FEA.

Methods

To increase the accuracy and efficiency of FEA, nucleus position and cross-sectional area ratio were measured from imaging data. A FEA model with smoothened surfaces was constructed using measured values. Nucleus position was calibrated by estimating the differences in the range of motion (RoM) between the FEA model and that of an in-vitro study. Then, the differences were re-estimated by comparing the RoM, the intradiscal pressure, the facet contact force, and the disc compression to validate the measured and calibrated indicators. The computational time in different models was also recorded to evaluate the efficiency.

Results

Computational results indicated that 99% of accuracy was attained when measured and calibrated indicators were set in the FEA model, with a model validation of greater than 90% attained under almost all of the loading conditions. Computational time decreased by around 70% in the fitted model with smoothened surfaces compared with that of the reconstructed model.

Conclusions

The computational accuracy and efficiency of in-silico study can be improved in the lumbar FEA model constructed using smoothened surfaces with measured and calibrated relative nucleus position and its cross-sectional area ratio.

TELD with limited foraminoplasty has potential biomechanical advantages over TELD with large annuloplasty: an in-silico study

Background

Facetectomy, an important procedure in the in–out and out–in techniques of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD), is related to the deterioration of the postoperative biomechanical environment and poor prognosis. Facetectomy may be avoided in TELD with large annuloplasty, but iatrogenic injury of the annulus and a high grade of nucleotomy have been reported as risk factors influencing poor prognosis. These risk factors may be alleviated in TELD with limited foraminoplasty, and the grade of facetectomy in this surgery can be reduced by using an endoscopic dynamic drill.

Methods

An intact lumbo-sacral finite element (FE) model and the corresponding model with adjacent segment degeneration were constructed and validated to evaluate the risk of biomechanical deterioration and related postoperative complications of TELD with large annuloplasty and TELD with limited foraminoplasty. Changes in various biomechanical indicators were then computed to evaluate the risk of postoperative complications in the surgical segment.

Results

Compared with the intact FE models, the model of TELD with limited foraminoplasty demonstrated slight biomechanical deterioration, whereas the model of TELD with large annuloplasty revealed obvious biomechanical deterioration. Degenerative changes in adjacent segments magnified, rather than altered, the overall trends of biomechanical change.

Conclusions

TELD with limited foraminoplasty presents potential biomechanical advantages over TELD with large annuloplasty. Iatrogenic injury of the annulus and a high grade of nucleotomy are risk factors for postoperative biomechanical deterioration and complications of the surgical segment.

Comparison of the Pull-Out Strength between a Novel Micro-Dynamic Pedicle Screw and a Traditional Pedicle Screw in Lumbar Spine

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the strength of a novel micro-dynamic pedicle screw by comparing it to the traditional pedicle screw.

METHODS

Forty-five lumbar vertebrae received a traditional pedicle screw on one side and a micro-dynamic pedicle screw on the other side as follows (traditional group vs micro-dynamic group): 15 vertebrae underwent instant pull-out testing; 15 vertebrae underwent 5000-cyclic fatigue loading testing; and 15 vertebrae underwent 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning. The peek pull-out force and normalized peek pull-out force after instant pull-out testing, 5000-cyclic and 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing were recorded to estimate the resistance of two types of screws. Bone mineral density was recorded to investigate the strength of the different screws in osteoporotic patients. And the semidiameter of the screw insertion area on micro-CT images after fatigue were compared to describe the performance between screw and bone surface.

RESULTS

The bone mineral density showed a weak correlation with peek pull-out force (r = 0.252, P = 0.024). The peek pull-out force of traditional pedicle screw after 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading were smaller than that of instant pull-out test in both osteoporotic (P = 0.017) and healthy group (P = 0.029), the peek pull-out force of micro-dynamic pedicle screw after 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading was smaller than that in instant pull-out test in osteoporotic group (P = 0.033), but no significant difference in healthy group (P = 0.853). The peek pull-out force in traditional group and micro-dynamic group underwent instant pull-out testing (P = 0.485), and pull-out testing after 5000-cyclic fatigue loading testing (P = 0.184) did not show significant difference. However, the peek pull-out force in micro-dynamic group underwent pull-test after 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing was significantly greater than that measured in traditional group (P = 0.005). The normalized peek pull-out force of traditional groups underwent instant pull-out testing, pull-out test after 5000-cyclic and 10,000-cyclic fatigue loading testing significantly decreased as the number of cycles increased (P < 0.001); meanwhile, the normalized peek pull-out force of micro-dynamic groups remained consistent regardless of the number of cycles (P = 0.133). The semidiameter after the fatigue loading test of the traditional screw insertion area was significantly larger than that of the micro-dynamic screw insertion area (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The novel micro-dynamic pedicle screw provides stronger fixation stability in high-cyclic fatigue loading and non-osteoporotic patients versus the traditional pedicle screw, but similar resistance in low-cycle fatigue testing and osteoporotic group vs the traditional pedicle screw.

The stability of long-segment and short-segment fixation for treating severe burst fractures at the thoracolumbar junction in osteoporotic bone: A finite element analysis

The majority of compressive vertebral fractures in osteoporotic bone occur at the level of the thoracolumbar junction. Immediate decompression is often required in order to reduce the extent of neurological damage. This study evaluated four fixation methods for decompression in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures, and presented the most suitable method for osteoporotic patients. A finite element model of a T7–L5 spinal segment was created and subjected to an L1 corpectomy to simulate a serious burst fracture. Five models were tested: a) intact spine; 2) two segment fixation (TSF), 3) up-three segment fixation (UTSF), below-three segment fixation (BTSF), and four segment fixation (FSF). The ROM, stiffness and compression ratio of the fractured vertebra were recorded under various loading conditions. The results of this study showed that the ROM of the FSF model was the lowest, and the ROMs of UTSF and BTSF models were similar but still greater than the TSF model. Decreasing the BMD to simulate osteoporotic bone resulted in a ROM for the four instrumented models that was higher than the normal bone model. Of all models, the FSF model had the highest stiffness at T12-L2 in extension and lateral bending. Similarly, the compression ratio of the FSF model at L1 was also higher than the other instrumented models. In conclusion, FSF fixation is suggested for patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures. For patients with normal bone quality, both UTSF and BTSF fixation provide an acceptable stiffness in extension and lateral bending, as well as a favorable compression ratio at L1.

A Novel Ultrasound-Based Lower Extremity Motion Tracking System

Tracking joint motion of the lower extremity is important for human motion analysis. In this study, we present a novel ultrasound-based motion tracking system for measuring three-dimensional (3D) position and orientation of the femur and tibia in 3D space and quantifying tibiofemoral kinematics under dynamic conditions. As ultrasound is capable of detecting underlying bone surface noninvasively through multiple layers of soft tissues, an integration of multiple A-mode ultrasound transducers with a conventional motion tracking system provides a new approach to track the motion of bone segments during dynamic conditions. To demonstrate the technical and clinical feasibilities of this concept, an in vivo experiment was conducted. For this purpose the kinematics of healthy individuals were determined in treadmill walking conditions and stair descending tasks. The results clearly demonstrated the potential of tracking skeletal motion of the lower extremity and measuring six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) tibiofemoral kinematics and related kinematic alterations caused by a variety of gait parameters. It was concluded that this prototyping system has great potential to measure human kinematics in an ambulant, non-radiative, and noninvasive manner.

Effectiveness of Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization in Treating Discogenic Low Back Pain

PURPOSE

To assess clinical outcomes after dynamic stabilization in discogenic low back pain.

METHODS

From April 2012 to January 2015, 23 patients with discogenic low back pain were treated with dynamic stabilization via the Wiltse approach. Main clinical assessments included visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and complications. Radiographs were evaluated for lumbar range of motion and intervertebral height. The Woodend classification was determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

There were 23 cases evaluated with a mean follow-up time of 39 months. At last follow-up, visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores improved significantly compared with preoperatively (P < 0.05). At the stabilized segments, the height of intervertebral discs was increased significantly after surgery (P < 0.05). At last follow-up, the height was reduced to the preoperative level. At the operated segment, 47.4% of the flexion/extension range of motion was retained. Six discs showed rehydration with 1 grade improvement on the Woodend classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic stabilization was a safe and effective treatment in carefully selected groups of patients with discogenic low back pain and promoted disc regeneration to some extent.

Biomechanical analysis of lumbar decompression surgery in relation to degenerative changes in the lumbar spine - Validated finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

There are no studies about the biomechanical analysis of lumbar decompression surgery in relation to degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare, by using finite element (FE) analysis, the biomechanical changes of the lumbar spine in terms of annulus stress and nucleus pressure after two different kinds of lumbar decompression surgery in relation to disc degenerative changes.

METHODS

The validated intact and degenerated FE models (L2-5) were used in this study. In these two models, two different decompression surgical scenarios at L3-4, including conventional laminectomy (ConLa) and the spinous process osteotomy (SpinO), were simulated. Therefore, a total of six models were simulated. Under preloading, 7.5 Nm moments of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion were imposed. In each model, the maximal von Mises stress on the annulus fibrosus and nucleus pressure at the index segment (L3-4) and adjacent segments (L2-3 and L4-5) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The ConLa model and disc degeneration model demonstrated a larger annulus stress at the decompression level (L3-4) under all four moments than were seen in the SpinO model and healthy disc model, respectively. Therefore, the ConLa model with moderate disc degeneration showed the highest annulus stress at the decompression level (L3-4). However, the percent change of annulus stress at L3-4 from the intact model to the matched decompression model was less in the moderate disc degeneration model than in the healthy disc model.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the ConLa model with moderate disc degeneration showed the highest annulus stress, the degenerative models would be less influenced by the decompression technique.

Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior column reconstruction: A finite element study

BACKGROUND

In an effort to minimize rod fractures and nonunion in pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) constructs, surgeons have adopted multirod constructs and interbody cages. Anterior column realignment (ACR) with posterior column osteotomies is a minimally invasive alternative to PSO in sagittal balance correction, however, there is a paucity of evidence with respect to rod survival.

METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) finite-element-model of a T12-sacrum spine segment was used to compare a 25° PSO at L3 and an ACR with a posterior column osteotomy and 30° hyperlordotic interbody cage at L3-4. The amount of overall T12-S1 lordosis correction was the same for each condition. Each simulation included cobalt chromium alloy primary rods with: (1) PSO; (2) PSO with an interbody cage (IB) at L2-3 (PSO+IB); (3) PSO with accessory (A) rods and IB at L2-3 (PSO+IB+A); (4) PSO with satellite (S) rods and IB at L2-3 (PSO+IB+2S); (5) ACR; 6) ACR with satellite rods (ACR + 2S). A 400 N follower preload was simulated for each condition.

RESULTS

PSO condition had the largest rod stress of 286 MPa in flexion. Adding interbody support reduced the rod stress by 15%. The 4-rod constructs further reduced rod stress, with the satellite rod condition facilitating the largest reduction. The rod stress in the ACR+2S was equivalent to the PSO+2S, with 50% reduction in rod stress.

CONCLUSION

The rod stress with an ACR was comparable to a PSO coupled with interbody support. These results suggest an ACR is a viable MIS alternative to a PSO without the need for a large posterior osteotomy.

Reduction of intradiscal pressure by the use of polycarbonate-urethane rods as compared to titanium rods in posterior thoracolumbar spinal fixation

Loss of sagittal alignment and balance in adult spinal deformity can cause severe pain, disability and progressive neurological deficit. When conservative treatment has failed, spinal fusion using rigid instrumentation is currently the salvage treatment to stop further curve progression. However, fusion surgery is associated with high revision rates due to instrumentation failure and proximal junctional failure, especially if patients also suffer from osteoporosis. To address these drawbacks, a less rigid rod construct is proposed, which is hypothesized to provide a more gradual transition of force and load distribution over spinal segments in comparison to stiff titanium rods. In this study, the effect of variation in rod stiffness on the intradiscal pressure (IDP) of fixed spinal segments during flexion-compression loading was assessed. An ex vivo multisegment (porcine) flexion-compression spine test comparing rigid titanium rods with more flexible polycarbonate-urethane (PCU) rods was used. An increase in peak IDP was found for both the titanium and PCU instrumentation groups as compared to the uninstrumented controls. The peak IDP for the spines instrumented with the PCU rods was significantly lower in comparison to the titanium instrumentation group. These results demonstrated the differences in mechanical load transfer characteristics between PCU and titanium rod constructs when subjected to flexion-compression loading. The concept of stabilization with a less rigid rod may be an alternative to fusion with rigid instrumentation, with the aim of decreasing mechanical stress on the instrumented segments and the possible benefit of a decrease in the incidence of screw pullout.

The influence of L4-S1 Dynesys® dynamic stabilization versus fusion on lumbar motion and its relationship with lumbar degeneration: a retrospective study

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Dynesys® posterior dynamic stabilization (PDS) in the treatment of L4–S1 degenerative diseases and to assess the influence of postoperative motion on lumbar degeneration.

Methods

Included in this retrospective study were patients with L4–S1 degenerative disease who underwent fusion or PDS from September 2010 to September 2014. Clinical outcomes were assessed by preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Preoperative and postoperative X-rays assessed range of motion (ROM) of the non-surgical and surgical levels and whole lumbar. MRI assessed degeneration of non-surgical levels.

Results

A total of 56 consecutive patients were divided into two groups: group A, PDS, and group B, fusion. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. In both groups, there was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative VAS and ODI scores (P < 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in a 6-month follow-up ODI between the two groups (P < 0.05). X-rays showed PDS patients partially maintained surgical level ROM and non-surgical level ROM increased less than in the fusion group. MRI showed adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in both groups, and patients whose preoperative L3–4 Pfirrmann classification was higher than grade 2 had more ASD than lower than grade 2.

Conclusion

PDS can maintain surgical level ROM and had less influence on whole and non-surgical level ROM. Following PDS, patients recovered faster and had a better lumbar function. It may be a better choice for multi-level lumbar degenerative diseases.

Biomechanical Effects of a Dynamic Topping off Instrumentation in a Long Rigid Pedicle Screw Construct

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical ex vivo study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if topping off instrumentation can reduce the hypermobility in the adjacent segments when compared with the classic rigid spinal instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA

Long rigid instrumentation might increase the mechanical load in the adjacent segments, the resulting hypermobility, and the risk for adjacent segment disease. Topping off instrumentation intends to reduce the hypermobility at the adjacent level by more evenly distributing segmental motion and, thereby, potentially mitigating adjacent level disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight human spines (Th12-L5) were divided into 2 groups. In the rigid group, a 3-segment metal rod instrumentation (L2-L5) was performed. The hybrid group included a 2-segment metal rod instrumentation (L3-L5) with a dynamic topping off instrumentation (L2-L3). Each specimen was tested consecutively in 3 different configurations: native (N=8), 2-segment rod instrumentation (L3-L5, N=8), 3-segment instrumentation (rigid: N=4, hybrid: N=4). For each configuration the range of motion (ROM) of the whole spine and each level was measured by a motion capture system during 5 cycles of extension-flexion (angle controlled to ±5 degrees, 0.1 Hz frequency, no preload).

RESULTS

In comparison with the intact spine, both the rigid 3-segment instrumentation and the hybrid instrumentation significantly reduced the ROM in the instrumented segments (L2-L5) while increasing the movement in the adjacent segment L1-L2 (P=0.002, η=0.82) and in Th12-L1 (P<0.001, η=0.90). There were no ROM differences between the rigid and hybrid instrumentation in all segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing the dynamic topping off did not impart any significant difference in the segmental motion when compared with the rigid instrumentation. Therefore, the current biomechanical study could not show a benefit of using this specific topping off instrumentation to solve the problem of adjacent segment disease.

Hybrid Instrumentation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Three Different Instrumentation Techniques

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo human cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE

The development or progression of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after spine stabilization and fusion is a major problem in spine surgery. Apart from optimal balancing of the sagittal profile, dynamic instrumentation is often suggested to prevent or impede ASD. Hybrid instrumentation is used to gain stabilization while allowing motion to avoid hypermobility in the adjacent segment. In this biomechanical study, the effects of two different hybrid instrumentations on human cadaver spines were evaluated and compared with a rigid instrumentation.

METHODS

Eighteen human cadaver spines (T11-L5) were subdivided into three groups: rigid, dynamic, and hook comprising six spines each. Clinical parameters and initial mechanical characteristics were consistent among groups. All specimens received rigid fixation from L3-L5 followed by application of a free bending load of extension and flexion. The range of motion (ROM) for every segment was evaluated. For the rigid group, further rigid fixation from L1-L5 was applied. A dynamic Elaspine system (Spinelab AG, Winterthur, Switzerland) was applied from L1 to L3 for the dynamic group, and the hook group was instrumented with additional laminar hooks at L1-L3. ROM was then evaluated again.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in ROM among the three instrumentation techniques.

CONCLUSION

Based on this data, the intended advantage of a hybrid or dynamic instrumentation might not be achieved.

The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) remains problematic following multilevel instrumented spine surgery. Previous biomechanical studies indicate that providing less rigid fixation at the cranial aspect of a long posterior instrumented construct, via transition rods or hooks at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), may provide a gradual transition to normal motion and prevent PJK. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of posterior anchored polyethylene tethers to distribute proximal motion segment stiffness in long instrumented spine constructs.

METHODS

A finite element model of a T7–L5 spine segment was created to evaluate range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, pedicle screw loads, and forces in the posterior ligament complex within and adjacent to the proximal terminus of an instrumented spine construct. Six models were tested: 1) intact spine; 2) bilateral, segmental pedicle screws (PS) at all levels from T-11 through L-5; 3) bilateral pedicle screws from T-12 to L-5 and transverse process hooks (TPH) at T-11 (the UIV); 4) pedicle screws from T-11 to L5 and 1-level tethers from T-10 to T-11 (TE-UIV+1); 5) pedicle screws from T-11 to L-5 and 2-level tethers from T-9 to T-11 (TE-UIV+2); and 6) pedicle screws and 3-level tethers from T-8 to T-11 (TE-UIV+3).

RESULTS

Proximal-segment range of motion (ROM) for the PS construct increased from 16% at UIV−1 to 91% at UIV. Proximal-segment ROM for the TPH construct increased from 27% at UIV−1 to 92% at UIV. Posterior tether constructs distributed ROM at the UIV and cranial adjacent segments most effectively; ROM for TE-UIV+1 was 14% of the intact model at UIV−1, 76% at UIV, and 98% at UIV+1. ROM for TE-UIV+2 was 10% at UIV−1, 51% at UIV, 69% at UIV+1, and 97% at UIV+2. ROM for TE-UIV+3 was 7% at UIV−1, 33% at UIV, 45% at UIV+1, and 64% at UIV+2. Proximal segment intradiscal pressures, pedicle screw loads, and ligament forces in the posterior ligament complex were progressively reduced with increasing number of posterior tethers used.

CONCLUSIONS

Finite element analysis of long instrumented spine constructs demonstrated that posterior tethers created a more gradual transition in ROM and adjacent-segment stress from the instrumented to the noninstrumented spine compared with all PS and TPH constructs. Posterior tethers may limit the biomechanical risk factor for PJK; however, further clinical research is needed to evaluate clinical efficacy.

Clinical experiences of dynamic stabilizers: Dynesys and Dynesys top loading system for lumbar spine degenerative disease

Dynesys (Dynamic Neutralization System) was designed to overcome the shortcomings of fusion. The Dynesys top loading (DTL) system is a new alternative Dynesys system that can be applied via a minimally invasive procedure. This study aimed to ascertain whether DTL is a suitable device for motion preservation and prevention of instability, and to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between DTL and Dynesys. In this study, 12 patients were treated with Dynesys and 21 patients were treated with DTL. Back and leg pain were evaluated using the visual analog scale. The Oswestry Disability Index was used to evaluate the patients' function. Range of motion (ROM) at the operative level and for the whole lumbar spine was measured pre- and postoperatively. The length of wound, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and operation duration were also compared. All patients were followed up for 12-76 months. Scores on the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly improved postoperatively. The median ROM of the whole spine and index level ROM in all patients showed 12.5% and 79.6% loss, respectively. The DTL group exhibited significantly better results in terms of blood loss, wound length, and operation duration, in addition to early ambulation. In conclusion, Dynesys and DTL are semirigid fixation systems that can significantly improve clinical symptoms and signs. Our results suggested that DTL was better than Dynesys as a result of it being a minimally invasive procedure. However, further study with large sample sizes and longer follow-up durations is required to validate the effects of these dynamic stabilizers.

Biomechanics of a Posterior Lumbar Motion Stabilizing Device: In Vitro Comparison to Intact and Fused Conditions

STUDY DESIGN

Nondestructive flexibility tests were performed in vitro, comparing multiple conditions of fixation in a single group of specimens.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the biomechanical behavior of the lumbar spine in the intact condition, after implanting a novel motion stabilizer, and after implanting a rigid fixator.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Two specific scenarios that may benefit from dynamic lumbar stabilization are single-level moderate instability, where the stabilizing tissues are relatively incompetent, and juxta-level to fusion, where the last instrumented level requires intermediate stiffness ("topping off") to prevent transfer of high stresses from the stiffer fusion construct to the intact adjacent levels. Both scenarios were evaluated in vitro.

METHODS

Seven human cadaveric L2-S1 segments were tested (1) intact, (2) after moderate destabilization, (3) after 2-level hybrid posterior fixation, consisting of bilateral dynamic pedicle screws at L4 interconnected with rigid rods to standard pedicle screws at L5 and S1, (4) after 2-level rigid fixation, (5) after 1-level (L4-L5) dynamic fixation, and (6) after 1-level rigid fixation. In each condition, angular range of motion (ROM) and sagittal instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) were assessed.

RESULTS

In 1-level constructs, dynamic hardware allowed 104% of intact ROM, whereas rigid hardware allowed 49% of intact ROM. Relative to the intact, the IAR was shifted significantly farther posterior by rigid 1-level instrumentation than by dynamic 1-level instrumentation. In 2-level constructs, the dynamic level allowed significantly greater ROM than the rigid level in all directions but allowed significantly less ROM than the intact level in all directions except axial rotation.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic instrumentation shifted the IAR less than rigid instrumentation, providing more favorable kinematics. This dynamic stabilizer provided 1-level ROM that was close to intact ROM during all loading modes in vitro. In the topping-off construct, the dynamic segment allowed intermediate ROM to give balanced transitional flexibility.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Biomechanical assessment of the stabilization capacity of monolithic spinal rods with different flexural stiffness and anchoring arrangement

BACKGROUND

Spinal disorders can be treated by several means including fusion surgery. Rigid posterior instrumentations are used to obtain the stability needed for fusion. However, the abrupt stiffness variation between the stabilized and intact segments leads to proximal junctional kyphosis. The concept of spinal rods with variable flexural stiffness is proposed to create a more gradual transition at the end of the instrumentation.

METHOD

Biomechanical tests were conducted on porcine spine segments (L1-L6) to assess the stabilization capacity of spinal rods with different flexural stiffness. Dual-rod fusion constructs containing three kinds of rods (Ti, Ti-Ni superelastic, and Ti-Ni half stiff-half superelastic) were implanted using two anchor arrangements: pedicle screws at all levels or pedicle screws at all levels except for upper instrumented vertebra in which case pedicle screws were replaced with transverse process hooks. Specimens were loaded in forward flexion, extension, and lateral bending before and after implantation of the fusion constructs. The effects of different rods on specimen stiffness, vertebra mobility, intradiscal pressures, and anchor forces were evaluated.

FINDING

The differences in rod properties had a moderate impact on the biomechanics of the instrumented spine when only pedicle screws were used. However, this effect was amplified when transverse process hooks were used as proximal anchors.

INTERPRETATION

Combining transverse hooks and softer (Ti-Ni superelastic and Ti-Ni half stiff-half superelastic) rods provided more motion at the upper instrumented level and applied less force on the anchors, potentially improving the load sharing capacity of the instrumentation.

Experimental Evaluation of the Developmental Mechanism Underlying Fractures at the Adjacent Segment

BACKGROUND

Compression fractures at adjacent mobile segments have been reported as adjacent segment disease under trauma in several studies. In this study, the occurrence of fractures at the adjacent segment was evaluated experimentally under trauma.

METHODS

Static testing of different fixation systems was performed to show their biomechanical performances. The ovine vertebrae fixed with rigid, dynamic, and semirigid systems were used as test samples. The stiffness values of the systems were obtained by testing the vertebrectomy models under compression bending, lateral bending, and torsion tests. In addition, their effects on the adjacent segments were experimentally evaluated within a drop mechanism. A free-fall drop mechanism was designed and manufactured. Next, 3.5-kg, 5-kg, and 7-kg weights were released from 1 m above the test samples to generate compression fractures. The occurrence of compression fractures was observed with the use of radiograph of test samples, which were obtained before and after the drop test.

RESULTS

Dynamic and semirigid systems have advantages compared with rigid systems as the result of their lower stiffness values. Radiographs showed that epiphysis fractures occurred at fixed and adjacent mobile segments, which were fixed with semirigid fixation. In addition, dynamic fixation well preserved the fixed and adjacent mobile segments under trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic system with a polyetheretherketone rod can better preserve both adjacent and fixed segments. However, because of the cantilever beam effect, the semirigid system exhibits a great disadvantage.

In Vitro Comparison of Dynesys, PEEK, and Titanium Constructs in the Lumbar Spine

Introduction. Pedicle based posterior dynamic stabilization systems aim to stabilize the pathologic spine while also allowing sufficient motion to mitigate adjacent level effects. Two flexible constructs that have been proposed to act in such a manner, the Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization System and PEEK rod, have yet to be directly compared in vitro to a rigid Titanium rod. Methods. Human lumbar specimens were tested in flexion extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion to evaluate the following conditions at L4-L5: Intact, Dynesys, PEEK rod, Titanium rod, and Destabilized. Intervertebral range of motion, interpedicular travel, and interpedicular displacement metrics were evaluated from 3rd-cycle data using an optoelectric tracking system. Results. Statistically significant decreases in ROM compared to Intact and Destabilized conditions were detected for the instrumented conditions during flexion extension and lateral bending. AT ROM was significantly less than Destabilized but not the Intact condition. Similar trends were found for interpedicular displacement in all modes of loading; however, interpedicular travel trends were less consistent. More importantly, no metrics under any mode of loading revealed significant differences between Dynesys, PEEK, and Titanium. Conclusion. The results of this study support previous findings that Dynesys and PEEK constructs behave similarly to a Titanium rod in vitro.

The influence of facet joint orientation and tropism on the stress at the adjacent segment after lumbar fusion surgery: a biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Facet joint orientation and tropism influence the biomechanics of the corresponding segment. Therefore, the sagittal orientation or tropism of the facet joint adjacent to the fusion segment seems a potential risk factor for adjacent segment degeneration. However, there have been no biomechanical studies regarding this issue.

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between adjacent facet orientation and facet tropism and stress in adjacent disc/facet joints using finite element (FE) analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

An FE analysis.

METHODS

Four intact (F50, F55, F60, and FT [facet tropism]) and matched L3-L4 fusion (F50, F55, F60, and FT fusion) models with different facet joint orientation (50°, 55°, 60° relative to the coronal plane, and facet tropism, respectively) at both L2-L3 facet joints were simulated. In each model, intradiscal pressures and facet contact force at the L2-L3 segment were investigated under pure moments and anterior shear force.

RESULTS

Compared with the matched-intact model, the F60 fusion model yielded the highest and largest percentage increase of intradiscal pressure at the L2-L3 segment under flexion, torsion moment, and anterior shear force among the F50, F55, and F60 fusion models. F60 fusion model also demonstrated the largest facet contact force under torsion moment among the F50, F55, and F60 fusion models. In all conditions tested, the FT fusion model demonstrated the highest intradiscal pressure and facet contact force of all the models.

CONCLUSIONS

Facet joint orientation and tropism at the adjacent segment influences the overstress of the adjacent segment, especially under the clinical circumstance of increased anterior shear force.

Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study

OBJECT

The authors evaluated the biomechanical effects of an interspinous process (ISP) device on kinematics and load sharing at the implanted and adjacent segments.

METHODS

A 3D finite-element (FE) model of the lumbar spine (L1–5) was developed and validated through comparison with published in vitro study data. Specifically, validation was achieved by a flexible (load-control) approach in 3 main planes under a pure moment of 10 Nm and a compressive follower load of 400 N. The ISP device was inserted between the L-3 and L-4 processes. Intact and implanted cases were simulated using the hybrid protocol in all motion directions. The resultant motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure after implantation were investigated at the index and adjacent levels. In addition, stress at the bone-implant interface was predicted.

RESULTS

The hybrid approach, shown to be appropriate for adjacent-level investigations, predicted that the ISP device would decrease the range of motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure at the index level relative to the corresponding values for the intact spine in extension. Specifically, the intradiscal pressure induced after implantation at adjacent segments increased by 39.7% and by 6.6% at L2–3 and L4–5, respectively. Similarly, facet loads at adjacent segments after implantation increased up to 60% relative to the loads in the intact case. Further, the stress at the bone-implant interface increased significantly. The influence of the ISP device on load sharing parameters in motion directions other than extension was negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ISP devices apply a distraction force on the processes and prevent further extension of the index segment, their implantation may cause changes in biomechanical parameters such as facet load, intradiscal pressure, and range of motion at adjacent levels in extension.

The current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature

In vitro biomechanical investigations have become a routinely employed technique to explore new lumbar instrumentation. One of the most important advantages of such investigations is the low risk present when compared to clinical trials. However, the best use of any experimental data can be made when standard testing protocols are adopted by investigators, thus allowing comparisons among studies. Experimental variables, such as the length of the specimen, operative level, type of loading (e.g., dynamic versus quasistatic), magnitude, and rate of load applied, are among the most common variables controlled during spinal biomechanical testing. Although important efforts have been made to standardize these protocols, high variability can be found in the current literature. The aim of this investigation was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify the current trends in the protocols reported for the evaluation of new lumbar spinal implants under laboratory setting.

How does free rod-sliding affect the posterior instrumentation for a dynamic stabilization using a bovine calf model?

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical cadaveric study in lumbar calf spine.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the effects of selected degrees of freedom (df) on the dynamic stabilization of the spine in terms of segmental range of motion (RoM), center of rotation (CoR), and implant loadings.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

For dorsal stabilization, rigid implant systems are becoming increasingly complemented by numerous dynamic systems based on pedicle screws and varying df. However, it is still unclear which df is most suitable to accomplish a physiologically related dynamic stabilization, and which loadings are induced to the implants. Human and calf specimens are reported to show certain similarities in their biomechanics. Young healthy calf specimens are not degenerated and show less interindividual differences than elderly human specimens. However, the existing differences between species limit the conclusions in a preclinical setting.

METHODS

Six calf specimens from level L3-L4 were analyzed in flexion and extension with a 6-df robotic spine simulator. A clinical functional radiological examination tool was used and parameters such as RoM, CoR, and implant loadings were determined for 6 configurations: (1) intact, (2) defect, (3) rigid fixation, (4) free craniocaudal (CC) rod-sliding, (5) free polyaxiality, and (6) combined free rod-sliding and free polyaxiality. The location of the CoR was determined relative to vertebral body dimensions. A CoR repositioning was defined as sufficient when its median differed less than 5% of the vertebral body dimensions.

RESULTS

Free rod-sliding in the CC direction restored the CoR from the defect back to the intact condition. The RoM could be significantly reduced to approximately 1/2 of the intact condition. Compared with the rigid condition, the implant bending moments increased from 0.3/-0.8 Nm (flexion/extension) to 1.3/-1.2 Nm for the free CC rod-sliding condition.

CONCLUSION

Free CC rod-sliding restores the intact conditions of the tested kinematic parameters most suitably and at the same time reduces the RoM. Stabilization toward the intact condition could decrease the risk of stress shielding and the progress of segment degeneration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.