Cross-links in posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentation of the spine: a systematic review on mechanical, biomechanical, numerical and clinical studies

Comparison of crossed and parallel rod configurations used in posterior occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fixations: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study is aimed to compare the differences in clinical outcomes between the crossed rod configuration and the parallel rod configuration applied in posterior occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fixations, and to assess the clinical applicability of crossed rods.

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2021, 21 patients with craniocervical junction disorders were treated surgically with the crossed rod technique (CR group). Meanwhile, 27 corresponding patients treated with the conventional parallel rod technique were included as control (PR group). Clinical data, internal fixation type, neurological status, clinical symptoms relief, image parameter, complications and bone fusion conditions were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in baseline characteristics, fixation type and postoperative complications between the two groups. Although the postoperative ADI was significantly reduced in both groups, the ADI was significantly greater in the CR group than that in the PR group after surgery and at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). All patients achieved bone fusion at 1-year postoperative follow-up except for one case in the PR group. However, patients in the CR group had a significantly higher fusion rate than those in the PR group at 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a crossed rod configuration in posterior occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fixations provides good clinical applicability. Although this technique has a relatively weaker reduction force, it has greater fixation stability and a higher rate of early bone fusion. This technique could be an easy and viable alternative to the current parallel rod configuration for upper cervical surgery.

The Influence of Titanium-coated Poryetheretherketone Cages in Fusion Status after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation

OBJECTIVE

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation (CBT-PLIF) shows potential for reducing adjacent segmental disease. Previously, our investigations revealed a relatively lower fusion rate with the use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CP) cages in CBT-PLIF compared with traditional pedicle screw fixation (PS-PLIF) using CP cages. This study aims to evaluate whether the implementation of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TP) cages can enhance fusion outcomes in CBT-PLIF.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 68 consecutive patients who underwent CBT-PLIF with TP cages (TP group) and 89 patients who underwent CBT-PLIF with CP cages (CP group). Fusion status was assessed using computed tomography at 1 year postoperatively and dynamic plain radiographs at 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in fusion rates were observed at 1 and 2 years postoperatively between the TP group (86.8% and 89.7%, respectively) and the CP group (77.5% and 88.8%, respectively). Notably, the CP group exhibited a significant improvement in fusion rate from 1 to 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.002), while no significant improvement was observed in the TP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of temporal changes in fusion rates reveals that only the TP group achieved a peak fusion rate 1 year postoperatively. This implies that TP cages may enhance the fusion process even after CBT-PLIF. Nevertheless, the definitive efficacy of TP cages for CBT-PLIF remains uncertain in the context of overall fusion rates.

L4 fixation is not necessary in L5-Iliac spinopelvic fixation after trauma, but coadjutant transilio-transsacral fixation is

INTRODUCTION

Spinopelvic dissociation (SPD) is a severe injury characterized by a discontinuity between the spine and the bony pelvis consisting of a bilateral longitudinal sacral fracture, most of the times through sacral neuroforamen, and a horizontal fracture, usually through the S1 or S2 body. The introduction of the concept of triangular osteosynthesis has shown to be an advance in the stability of spinopelvic fixation (SPF). However, a controversy exists as to whether the spinal fixation should reach up to L4 and, if so, it should be combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTS).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical behavior in the laboratory of four different osteosynthesis constructs for SPD, including spinopelvic fixation of L5 versus L4 and L5; along with or without TTS in both cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

By means of a formerly described method by the authors, an unstable standardized H-type sacral fracture in twenty synthetic replicas of a male pelvis articulated to the lumbar spine, L1 to sacrum, (Model: 1300, SawbonesTM; Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA), instrumented with four different techniques, were mechanically tested. We made 4 different constructs in 5 specimen samples for each construct. Groups: Group 1. Instrumentation of the L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 2. Instrumentation of the L4-L5-Iliac bones with TTS. Group 3. Instrumentation of L5-Iliac bones without TTS. Group 4: Instrumentation of L4-L5-Iliac bones without TTS.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, it can be concluded that in SPD, better stability is obtained when proximal fixation is only up to L5, without including L4 (alternative hypothesis), the addition of transiliac-transsacral fixations is essential.

Clinical role of crosslink augmentation during short-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

We investigated the clinical role of crosslink augmentation during PLIF with total facetectomy. We retrospectively reviewed 376 patients who underwent one- or two-segment PLIF with unilateral or bilateral total facetectomy between January 2017 and March 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups based on whether a crosslink was instrumented or not. Radiological outcome measurements included fusion status and implant failure rates on 12-month postoperative computed tomography. Patient-reported outcome measures included the Numerical Rating Scale for lower back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary scores, which were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Surgery-related complications included surgical site infection, symptomatic implant failure, and epidural hematoma. Propensity score matching was performed to compare both groups after adjusting for confounding factors, including baseline and surgical procedural characteristics. A total of 200 cases were included in the propensity score calculation, and one-to-one matching was performed, resulting in 56 pairs with and without a crosslink. The fusion status (88.7 % vs. 85.5 %), screw loosening (14.3 % vs. 14.3 %), cage subsidence (17.9 % vs. 16.1 %), and cage dislodgement (5.4 % vs. 0 %) showed no significant difference between those with and without a crosslink, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the patient-reported outcomes or surgery-related complication rates between the groups. Crosslink augmentation during PLIF with total facetectomy is not recommended because it does not provide any radiological or clinical benefit and is associated with avoidable expenses.

Clinical and Biomechanical Study of Laminoplasty for Thoracic and Lumbar Intradural Tumors

(1) Background: Primary intraspinal tumors account for 2-15% of all central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Most intraspinal tumors are benign, and about 40% of them occur intradurally, for which early surgery is the preferred treatment. Laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation is the conventional surgical treatment. However, laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation is likely to reduce the spinal range of motion (ROM), with many other complications, although it can maintain the stability of the spine. The aim of this study is to determine whether laminoplasty as a new surgical approach for thoracic and lumbar intradural tumors is superior to laminectomy in preserving spinal ROM, maintaining spinal stability and reducing postoperative complications. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 50 patients who received intradural tumor resection, including 23 who received traditional laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation and 27 who received new laminoplasty. Spinal ROM was evaluated by lumbar flexion/extension radiograph and biomechanical evaluation. Spinal stability was evaluated by imaging observations of the spinal Cobb angle and laminar bone fusion. Postoperative complications were evaluated according to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and the length of hospital stay. (3) Results: Compared with the laminectomy group, patients in the laminoplasty group exhibited a better spinal ROM (31.6 ± 12.0° vs. 21.7 ± 11.8°, p = 0.013), a smaller Cobb angle (9.6 ± 4.3 vs. 12.5 ± 5.3, p = 0.034), a lower incidence of CSF leakage (4/14.8% vs. 11/47.8%, p = 0.015), and a shorter length of hospital stay (13.1 ± 1.8 vs. 15.1 ± 2.3 days, p = 0.001). Most patients in the laminoplasty group had satisfactory bone fusion. The biomechanical experiment also demonstrated that spinal ROM in laminoplasty was larger than that in the laminectomy group. (4) Conclusions: Compared with the traditional surgery, the new laminoplasty surgery can better maintain the stability of the spine, preserve spinal ROM, and reduce postoperative complications. It is a surgical method that can be clinically popularized.

Cross-link augmentation enhances CFR-PEEK short fixation in lumbar metastasis stabilization

Introduction: Spinal stability plays a crucial role in the success of the surgical treatment of lumbar vertebral metastasis and, in current practice, less invasive approaches such as short constructs have been considered. Concurrently, carbon fiber-reinforced (CFR) poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) fixation devices are expanding in oncologic spinal surgery thanks to their radiotransparency and valid mechanical properties. This study attempts to provide an exhaustive biomechanical comparison of different CFR-PEEK surgical stabilizations through a highly reproducible experimental setup. Methods: A Sawbones biomimetic phantom (T12-S1) was tested in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. An hemisome lesion on L3 vertebral body was mimicked and different pedicle screw posterior fixations were realized with implants from CarboFix Orthopedics Ltd: a long construct involving two spinal levels above and below the lesion, and a short construct involving only the levels adjacent to L3, with and without the addition of a transverse rod-rod cross-link; to provide additional insights on its long-term applicability, the event of a pedicle screw loosening was also accounted. Results: Short construct reduced the overloading onset caused by long stabilization. Particularly, the segmental motion contribution less deviated from the physiologic pattern and also the long-chain stiffness was reduced with respect to the prevalent long construct. The use of the cross-link enhanced the short stabilization by making it significantly stiffer in lateral bending and axial rotation, and by limiting mobiliza-tion in case of pedicle screw loosening. Discussion: The present study proved in vitro the biomechanical benefits of cross-link augmentation in short CFR-PEEK fixation, demonstrating it to be a potential alternative to standard long fixation in the surgical management of lumbar metastasis.

Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength among three different screw trajectories using single vertebrae and one-level functional spinal unit

Three key factors are responsible for the biomechanical performance of pedicle screw fixation: screw mechanical characteristics, bone quality and insertion techniques. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study has directly compared the biomechanical performance among three trajectories, i.e., the traditional trajectory (TT), modified trajectory (MT) and cortical bone trajectory (CBT), in a porcine model. This study compared the pullout strength and insertion torque of three trajectory methods in single vertebrae, the pullout strength and fixation stiffness including flexion, extension, and lateral bending in a one-level instrumented functional spinal unit (FSU) that mimics the in vivo configuration were clarified. A total of 18 single vertebrae and 18 FSUs were randomly assigned into three screw insertion methods (n = 6 in each trajectory group). In the TT group, the screw converged from its entry point, passed completely inside the pedicle, was parallel to the superior endplate, was located in the superior third of the vertebral body and reached to at least the anterior third of the vertebral body. In the MT group, the convergent angle was similar to that of the TT method but directed caudally to the anterior inferior margin of the vertebral body. The results of insertion torque and pullout strength in single vertebrae were analyzed; in addition, the stiffness and pullout strength in the one-level FSU were also investigated. This study demonstrated that, in single vertebrae, the insertion torque was significantly higher in CBT groups than in TT and MT groups (p < 0.05). The maximal pullout strength was significantly higher in MT groups than in TT and CBT groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in stiffness in the three motions among all groups. The maximal pullout strength in FSUs of MT and CBT groups were significantly higher than the TT groups (p < 0.05). We concluded that either MT or CBT provides better biomechanical performance than TT in single vertebrae or FSUs. The lack of significance of stiffness in FSUs among three methods suggested that MT or CBT could be a reasonable alternative to TT if the traditional trajectory was not feasible.

Is it a requirement or a preference to use cross-links in lumbar instrumentation?

Background/Aim: The use of cross-links (CL) is controversial due to reasons such as cost increases and instrument redundancy. While there are many biomechanical studies, the clinical data is limited. The aim of this study is to present the clinical effects of CL by putting forward postoperative clinical outcomes and long-term results of patients with (CL+) and without (CL-) CL augmentation. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent lumbar posterior instrumentation with CL+ (n = 164) and without CL- (n = 111) augmentation were evaluated. Demographic data, surgical results, preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) differences, and pseudoarthrosis and adjacent segment disease (ASD)-related recurrence for more than three years of follow-up were determined. Data of CL+ and CL- groups were compared. Results: CL+ and CL- groups were similar in terms of age and gender (P = 0.319 and P = 0.777, respectively) There was no difference between the two groups in terms of bleeding amount, duration of surgery, and duration of hospitalization (P = 0.931, P = 0.669 and P = 0.518, respectively). Groups were similar in terms of VAS and ODI differences (P = 0.915 and P = 0.983, respectively), yet there was one case of infection in the CL+ group and two cases of infection detected in the CL- group. There were 13 ASDs in the CL+ group, and eight ASDs in the CL- group. Pseudoarthrosis was seen seven times in the CL+ group, while it was four in the CL- group. Conclusion: It was observed that adding CL in patients who underwent lumbar instrumentation did not change the early period surgical results. The prevalence of complications was compatible with the scientific literature. In our study, there was no preventive advantage in terms of clinical or postoperative complications found in the use of CL.

S2 alar-iliac screw versus traditional iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation: a systematic review of comparative biomechanical studies

PURPOSE

To review and compare biomechanical properties between S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws and traditional iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All clinical, cadaveric, and finite-element model (FEM) studies that compared the biomechanical properties between S2AI screws and traditional iliac screws were included. Study methodological quality for cadaveric studies were analyzed using the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale.

RESULTS

Eight studies (4 cadaveric, 4 FEM) analyzing 58 S2AI screws and 48 traditional iliac screws were included. According to QUACS, the overall methodological quality was "moderate to good" for all four cadaveric studies. All four cadaveric studies found no difference in biomechanical stiffness, screw toggle, rod strain, and/or load-to-failure between the S2AI screws and traditional iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation. All four FEM studies found that S2AI screws were associated with lower implant stresses compared to traditional iliac screws.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate biomechanical evidence to suggest that there is no significant difference in stability and stiffness between S2AI screws and traditional iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation. However, there is some evidence to support that the placement of S2AI screws may have lower implant stresses on the overall lumbosacral instrumentation compared to traditional iliac screws.

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Cross-link Usage and Position in the Single and Multiple Segment Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have neither explored the usage of cross-links nor investigated the optimal position of the cross-links in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). This study evaluates biomechanical properties of cross-links in terms of different fixation segments and optimal position in single- and multi-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

METHODS

Two finite element (FE) models of instrumented lumbosacral spine with single-(L4/5) and multi-segment (L3-S1) PLIF surgery were simulated. On the basis of the two models, the benefits of the usage of cross-links were assessed and compared with the status of no application of cross-links. Moreover, the effects of position of cross-links on multi-segment PLIF surgery were studied in Upper, Middle, and Lower positions.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the range of motion (ROM), intersegmental rotational angle (IRA) of adjacent segments, and intradiscal pressure (IDP) regardless of the usage of cross-links in the single-segment PLIF surgery, while the cross-link increased the maximum von Mises stress in the fixation (MSF) under the axial rotation (53.65 MPa vs 41.42 MPa). In the multi-segment PLIF surgery, the usage of cross-links showed anti-rotational advantages indicated by ROM (Without Cross-link 2.35^o , Upper, 2.24^o ; Middle, 2.26^o ; Lower, 2.30^o ) and IRA (Without Cross-link 1.19^o , Upper, 1.08^o ; Middle, 1.09^o ; Lower, 1.13^o ). The greatest values of MSF were found in without cross-link case under the flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation (37.48, 62.61, and 86.73 MPa). The application of cross-links at the Middle and Lower positions had lower values of MSF (48.79 and 69.62 MPa) under the lateral bending and axial rotation, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The application of cross-links was not beneficial for the single-segment PLIF, while it was found highly advantageous for the multi-segment PLIF. Moreover, the usage of cross-links at the Middle or Lower positions resulted in a better biomechanical stability.

Location of pedicle screw hold in relation to bone quality and loads

Introduction: Sufficient screw hold is an indispensable requirement for successful spinal fusion, but pedicle screw loosening is a highly prevalent burden. The aim of this study was to quantify the contribution of the pedicle and corpus region in relation to bone quality and loading amplitude of pedicle screws with traditional trajectories.

Methods: After CT examination to classify bone quality, 14 pedicle screws were inserted into seven L5. Subsequently, Micro-CT images were acquired to analyze the screw’s location and the vertebrae were split in the midsagittal plane and horizontally along the screw’s axis to allow imprint tests with 6 mm long sections of the pedicle screws in a caudal direction perpendicular to the screw’s surface. Force-displacement curves in combination with the micro-CT data were used to reconstruct the resistance of the pedicle and corpus region at different loading amplitudes.

Results: Bone quality was classified as normal in three specimens, as moderate in two and as bad in two specimens, resulting in six, four, and four pedicle screws per group. The screw length in the pedicle region in relation to the inserted screw length was measured at an average of 63%, 62%, and 52% for the three groups, respectively. At a calculated 100 N axial load acting on the whole pedicle screw, the pedicle region contributed an average of 55%, 58%, and 58% resistance for the normal, moderate, and bad bone quality specimens, respectively. With 500 N load, these values were measured at 59%, 63%, and 73% and with 1000 N load, they were quantified at 71%, 75%, and 81%.

Conclusion: At lower loading amplitudes, the contribution of the pedicle and corpus region on pedicle screw hold are largely balanced and independent of bone quality. With increasing loading amplitudes, the contribution of the pedicle region increases disproportionally, and this increase is even more pronounced in situations with reduced bone quality. These results demonstrate the importance of the pedicle region for screw hold, especially for reduced bone quality.

Biomechanical study of rod stress in lumbopelvic fixation with lateral interbody fusion: an in vitro experimental study using synthetic bone models

OBJECTIVE

Despite improvements in surgical techniques and instruments, high rates of rod fracture following a long spinal fusion in the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) remain a concern. Thus, an improved understanding of rod fracture may be valuable for better surgical planning. The authors aimed to investigate mechanical stress on posterior rods in lumbopelvic fixation for the treatment of ASD.

METHODS

Synthetic lumbopelvic bone models were instrumented with intervertebral cages, pedicle screws, S2-alar-iliac screws, and rods. The construct was then placed in a testing device, and compressive loads were applied. Subsequently, the strain on the rods was measured using strain gauges on the dorsal aspect of each rod.

RESULTS

When the models were instrumented using titanium alloy rods at 30° lumbar lordosis and with lateral interbody fusion cages, posterior rod strain was highest at the lowest segment (L5-S1) and significantly higher than that at the upper segment (L2-3) (p = 0.002). Changing the rod contour from 30° to 50° caused a 36% increase in strain at L5-S1 (p = 0.009). Changing the rod material from titanium alloy to cobalt-chromium caused a 140% increase in strain at L2-3 (p = 0.009) and a 28% decrease in strain at L5-S1 (p = 0.016). The rod strain at L5-S1 using a flat bender for contouring was 23% less than that obtained using a French bender (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

In lumbopelvic fixation in which currently available surgical techniques for ASD are used, the posterior rod strain was highest at the lumbosacral junction, and depended on the contour and material of the rods.

The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation

Posterior screw-rod constructs can be used to stabilize spinal segments; however, the stiffness is not absolute, and some motion can persist. While the effect of crosslink-augmentation has been evaluated in multiple studies, the fundamental explanation of their effectiveness has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to quantify the parameters “screw rotation” and “parallelogram deformation” in posterior instrumentations with and without crosslinks to analyze and explain their fundamental effect. Biomechanical testing of 15 posteriorly instrumented human spinal segments (Th10/11—L4/L5) was conducted in axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion–extension with ± 7.5 Nm. Screw rotation and parallelogram deformation were compared for both configurations. Parallelogram deformation occurred predominantly during axial rotation (2.6°) and was reduced by 60% (−1.45°, p = 0.02) by the addition of a crosslink. Simultaneously, screw rotation (0.56°) was reduced by 48% (−0.27°, p = 0.02) in this loading condition. During lateral bending, 0.38° of parallelogram deformation and 1.44° of screw rotation was measured and no significant reduction was achieved by crosslink-augmentation (8%, −0.03°, −p = 0.3 and −13%, −0.19°, p = 0.7 respectively). During flexion–extension, parallelogram deformation was 0.4° and screw rotation was 0.39° and crosslink-augmentation had no significant effect on these values (−0.12°, −30%, p = 0.5 and −0°, −0%, p = 0.8 respectively). In axial rotation, crosslink-augmentation can reduce parallelogram deformation and with that, screw rotation. In lateral bending and flexion–extension parallelogram deformation is minimal and crosslink-augmentation has no significant effect. Since the relatively large screw rotation in lateral bending is not caused by parallelogram deformation, crosslink-augmentation is no adequate countermeasure. The fundamental understanding of the biomechanical effect of crosslink-augmentation helps better understand its potential and limitations in increasing construct stiffness.

Anterior Bridging Bone in a Newly Designed Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the distribution of multiple anterior bridging bone (ABB) patterns using a newly designed interbody cage with 4 anterior holes that enable communication between the inside and outside of the cage and to estimate its mechanical effect by finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

Patients underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion using ABB cages. Two raters evaluated the distribution patterns of ABB on computed tomography scans 1 year after surgery. We defined the term H-fusion as the presence of complete anterior extracage and intracage bone bridging, with ≥1 ABBs between them. We performed finite element analysis to investigate the effect of ABB on maximal stiffness.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 98 patients. ABB was most frequently observed in the medial hole of the cages (73.7%). The mean number of ABBs was 3.65, and H-fusion was observed at 135 levels (34%). Postoperative improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index was significantly higher in patients who achieved interbody fusion and H-fusion than in patients who did not. As ABB was added, the increment in the relative maximal stiffness was most affected under flexion and extension forces.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed an average of 3.65 complete ABBs. Finite element analysis demonstrated that ABB could increase the stability in fused segments, especially under flexion and extension stress. Our results suggest that the ABB cage, which allows communicating cross-bridging between inside and outside of the cage, may facilitate a more stable fusion process than a conventionally designed cage.