Pseudarthrosis in adult spine deformity surgery: risk factors and treatment options

Abdominal aortic calcification is associated with impaired fusion after elective spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The interplay between vascular compromise and spinal pathology has been underexplored in the context of spinal fusion outcomes. Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is associated with various degenerative spinal conditions, potentially due to impaired perfusion. However, the relationship between AAC and the success of osseous fusion mass formation following spinal fusion remains unexplored.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between AAC severity and fusion success following posterior lumbar spine fusion surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT POPULATION

Patients undergoing open posterior lumbar fusion between 2010 and 2021 at a single institution.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Osseous posterolateral fusion (PLF) and interbody fusion (IBF) on computed tomography.

METHODS

The institutional database was queried for patients who underwent open posterior spinal fusion and had postoperative CT scans at ≥12 months. Preoperative standing lateral lumbar radiographs were assessed for aortic calcification using the AAC-24 classification, which is a score between 0 (no AAC) to 24 (most severe AAC). Fusion success was evaluated using the Lenke (PLF) and Bridwell (IBF) classifications on CT. Binary outcomes of fusion success versus impairment were created for PLF and IBF and a combined outcome of either PLF and/or IBF for a third analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of impaired fusion, including AAC, age, sex, BMI, smoking, diabetes, number of levels fused, and fusion to the sacrum.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included for analysis. PLF impairment was observed in 28.5%, and IBF impairment in 22.7%. AAC was an independent predictor of impaired PLF (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20; p=.015) and combined PLF/IBF impairment (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.29; p=.002). Multivariable analysis revealed, that each one-point increase in the AAC-24 score increased the odds of combined fusion impairment by 16%, and an increase of one standard deviation was associated with approximately a 2-fold increase in risk. Number of levels fused also predicted combined fusion impairment (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.15-2.48; p=.009). No significant association was found between AAC and IBF impairment alone.

CONCLUSIONS

AAC is independently associated with posterolateral fusion impairment following spinal fusion surgery. routine preoperative assessment of AAC on lateral spine radiographs may help identify patients at higher risk for impaired fusion and guide surgical decision-making. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and evaluate strategies to mitigate this risk.

Long-term Titanium mesh cage implant failure after total en bloc spondylectomy due to spinal chondrosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To report an unusual titanium mesh cage failure after ten years of follow-up.

CLINICAL CASE

A 40-year-old woman diagnosed with low-grade spinal chondrosarcoma underwent a total en-bloc spondylenctomy (TES) surgery. This technique required a wide resection, anterior reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage (TMC), and posterior stabilization. For several years a favorable clinical outcome was achieved. After 10 years of follow-up, the patient developed acute non-traumatic low back pain without neurological repercussions. The images confirmed a rupture of the titanium cage. After ruling out tumor recurrence, the patient went through spinal instrumentation revision.

CONCLUSION

Isolated TMC rupture is a rare event scarcely reported in the literature. There is a strong recommendation to instrument two levels proximal and distal to the bone defect in 360° reconstructions after a TES. Stability had likely been lost over the years due to the slow resorption of the bone graft. We consider necessary studies with a higher casuistry and level of evidence to analyze the contributing factors for the event of TMC rupture.

Developing a risk score to inform the use of rhBMP-2 in adult spinal deformity surgery

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has not shown superior benefit overall in cost-effectiveness during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective PURPOSE: Generate a risk score for pseudarthrosis to inform the utilization of rhBMP-2, balancing costs against quality of life and complications.

METHODS

ASD patients with 3-year data were included. Quality of life gained was calculated from ODI to SF-6D and translated to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost was calculated using the PearlDiver database and CMS definitions for complications and comorbidities. Established weights were generated for predictive variables via logistic regression to yield a predictive risk score for pseudarthrosis that accounted for frailty, diabetes, depression, ASA grade, thoracolumbar kyphosis and three-column osteotomy use. Risk score categories, established via conditional inference tree (CIT)-derived thresholds were tested for cost-utility of rhBMP-2 usage, controlling for age, prior fusion, and baseline deformity and disability.

RESULTS

64% of ASD patients received rhBMP-2 (308/481). There were 17 (3.5%) patients that developed pseudarthrosis. rhBMP-2 use overall did not lower pseudarthrosis rates (OR: 0.5, [0.2-1.3]). Pseudarthrosis rates for each risk category were: No Risk (NoR) 0%; Low-Risk (LowR) 1.6%; Moderate Risk (ModR) 9.3%; High-Risk (HighR) 24.3%. Patients receiving rhBMP-2 had similar QALYs overall to those that did not (0.163 vs. 0.171, p = .65). rhBMP-2 usage had worse cost-utility in the LowR cohort (p < .001). In ModR patients, rhBMP-2 usage had equivocal cost-utility ($53,398 vs. $61,581, p = .232). In the HighR cohort, the cost-utility was reduced via rhBMP-2 usage ($98,328 vs. $211,091, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows rhBMP-2 demonstrates effective cost-utility for individuals at high risk for developing pseudarthrosis. The generated score can aid spine surgeons in the assessment of risk and enhance justification for the strategic use of rhBMP-2 in the appropriate clinical contexts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Instrumented L5-S1 interbody graft with IFUSE implant using the reverse Bohlman technique

BACKGROUND

In case of high sacral slope, anterior lumbosacral fusions can be performed by retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach using a reversed Bohlman technique with an autologous corticocancellous fibular graft. The use of a trans-lumbosacral implant can avoid the iatrogenic effects but currently, there is no implant specifically designed for this fusion technique. Could the IFUSE implant from SI BONE replace a fibular graft to avoiding the iatrogenic effect induced by sampling during a Reverse Bohlman technique?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present the case of a 38-year-old woman with L5S1 interbody pseudarthrosis after posterior fixation for grade 2 L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with isthmic lysis of L5, and that of a 69-year-old woman who underwent a posterior T4 fusion to the pelvis for degenerative scoliosis. Both required a trans-lumbosacral instrumented fusion via an anterior approach using the reverse Bohlman technique. Surgical technique was described.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. At 6 months, the patients reported a decrease in lumbar and radicular symptomatology. There were no infectious, neurological or vascular complications. CT-scans confirmed the good position and stability of the IFUSE implant.

DISCUSSION

We present an innovative interbody grafting technique adapted to spines with high pelvic incidence. The surgical technique is safe, minimally invasive, and reduces surgical iatrogeny. The short and medium-term results are positive but require longer-term follow-up and a larger cohort.

Posterior Corrective Surgery for Type II Congenital Kyphosis: SRS-Schwab Grade 4 Osteotomy or Vertebral Column Resection?

OBJECTIVE

Surgical decision-making for congenital kyphosis (CK) with failure of anterior segmentation (type II) has been contradictory regarding the trade-off between the pursuit of correction rate and the inherent risk of the osteotomy procedure. This study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic measurement in type II CK underwent SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy and vertebral column resection (VCR), the most-adapted osteotomy techniques for CK, and to propose the strategy to select between the two procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective observational comparative study evaluated surgical outcomes in type II CK patients underwent VCR or SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy at our institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients operated with VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy were allocated to Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. Radiographic parameters and SRS-22 quality of life metrics were assessed at pre-operation, post-operation, and during follow-up visits for both groups, allowing for a comprehensive comparison of surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (19 patients in Group 1 and 12 patients in Group 2) aged 16.3 ± 10.4 years were recruited. Correction of segmental kyphosis was similar between groups (51.1 ± 17.6° in Group 1 and 48.4 ± 19.8° in Group 2, p = 0.694). Group 1 had significantly longer operation time (365.9 ± 81.2 vs 221.4 ± 78.9, p < 0.001) and more estimated blood loss (975.2 ± 275.8 ml vs 725.9 ± 204.3 mL, p = 0.011). Alert event of intraoperative sensory and motor evoked potential (SEP and MEP) monitoring was observed in 1 patient of Group 2. Both groups had 1 transient post operative neurological deficit respectively.

CONCLUSION

SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy was suitable for kyphotic mass when its apex is the upper unsegmented vertebrae or the neighboring disc, or when the apical vertebrae with an anterior/posterior (A/P) height ratio of vertebral body higher than 1/3. VCR is suitable when the apex is located within the unsegmented mass with its A/P height ratio lower than 1/3. Proper selection of VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy according to our strategy, could provide satisfying radiographic and clinical outcomes in type II CK patients during a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients undergoing VCR procedure might have longer operation time, more blood loss and higher incidence of peri- and post-operative complications.

The Effects of Preoperative Epidural Steroid Injection on Pseudarthrosis Following Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of preoperative lumbar epidural steroid injection on the rate of pseudarthrosis following lumbar spine fusion surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Epidural corticosteroids help to reduce nerve root edema and suppress proinflammatory cytokines in patients with radiculopathy. Corticosteroids may inhibit bone formation and reduce bone matrix synthesis rates. Thus, there is concern that corticosteroids may reduce lumbar fusion capability, potentially resulting in increased rates of symptomatic pseudarthrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion surgery between 2018 and 2022. Patients were categorized into one of 3 groups: no preoperative epidural steroid injection (ESI) history (group 0), preoperative ESI within 90 days of surgery (group 1), or most recent ESI >90 days before surgery (group 2). The primary outcome of this study was pseudarthrosis. Binominal regression analyses were performed to determine the relationships between potential risk factors (sex, age, body mass index, smoking history, diabetes status, history of systemic steroid use, preoperative ESI, perioperative intravenous steroid administration, type of surgery, and postoperative ESI within 6 mo) and the development of postoperative pseudarthrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 446 patients were included in this study. Of those, 106 patients (23.7%) did not have a preoperative ESI (group 0), 132 patients (29.5%) had an ESI within 90 days of surgery (group 1), and 208 patients (46.6%) had their most recent ESI >90 days before surgery (group 2). The overall incidence of pseudarthrosis following lumbar fusion was 8.7% (39 of 446). Although the incidence of pseudarthrosis following ESI at any time point was higher than in our control cohort (group 0), this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no increased risk of postoperative pseudarthrosis in patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusions after preoperative ESI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Impact of Teriparatide on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Long Spinal Fusion According to Bone Density

BACKGROUND

Surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) poses substantial risks, including the development of symptomatic pseudarthrosis, which is twice as prevalent among patients with osteoporosis compared with those with normal bone mineral density (BMD). Limited data exist on the impact of teriparatide, an osteoanabolic compound, in limiting the rates of reoperation and pseudarthrosis after treatment of spinal deformity in patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Osteoporotic patients on teriparatide (OP-T group) were compared with patients with osteopenia (OPE group) and those with normal BMD. OP-T patients were matched with OPE patients and patients with normal BMD at a 1:2:2 ratio. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) involving >7 instrumented levels. The primary outcome was the 2-year reoperation rate. Secondary outcomes included pseudarthrosis with or without implant failure, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Clinical outcomes were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Changes in PROs were analyzed using a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty patients (52.6% normal BMD, 32.9% OPE, 14.4% OP-T) were included. In the unmatched cohort, 2-year reoperation rates (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20 to 0.91]) and pseudarthrosis rates (OR = 0.25 [95% CI: 0.08 to 0.61]) were significantly lower in the OP-T group than the OPE group. Seventy-eight patients in the OP-T group were matched to 156 patients in the OPE group. Among these matched patients, at 2 years, 23.1% (36) in the OPE group versus 11.5% (9) in the OP-T group had a reoperation (OR = 0.45, p = 0.0188), 21.8% (34) versus 6.4% (5) had pseudarthrosis with or without implant failure (OR = 0.25, p = 0.0048), and 6.4% (10) versus 7.7% (6) had PJK (OR = 1.18, p = 0.7547), respectively. At 2 years postoperatively, PROs were better among OP-T patients than OPE patients. Subsequently, 78 patients in the OP-T group were matched to 156 patients in the normal BMD group. Among these matched patients, there was no significant difference in 2-year reoperation (OR = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.37 to 1.98]), pseudarthrosis (OR = 0.51 [95% CI: 0.181 to 1.44]), and PJK rates (OR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.28 to 2.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporotic patients on teriparatide demonstrated lower reoperation and symptomatic pseudarthrosis rates 2 years postoperatively compared with osteopenic patients. Moreover, patient-reported and clinical outcomes for osteoporotic patients on teriparatide were not different from those for patients with normal BMD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Activity and sports resumption after long segment fusions to the pelvis for adult spinal deformity: survey results of AO Spine members

PURPOSE

To assess recommendations for when adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients may return to athletic activities after surgery.

METHODS

A web-based survey was administered to members of AO Spine. The survey consisted of surgeon demographic information and questions asking when a patient undergoing a long thoracolumbar fusion (> 5 levels) with pelvic fixation for ASD would be allowed to resume unrestricted range of motion (ROM), non-contact sports, and contact sports postoperatively. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine predictors for time to resume each activity.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty four members' responses were included for analysis. The majority of respondents would allow unrestricted ROM within 3 months postop (< 3 months: 81% vs > 3 months: 19%]. For when to return to non-contact sports, the most common responses were "2-3 months" (26.6%), "3-4 months" (26.6%), and "6-12 months" (18.5%). For when to return to contact sports, the majority advised > 4 months postop [> 4 months: "4-6 months" (19.2%), "6-12 months" (28.0%), " > 12 months" (28.8%) versus < 4 months: "1-2 months" (4.0%), "2-3 months" (1.6%), "3-4 months" (8.8%)]. 8.8% responded they would "never" allow resumption of contact sports.

CONCLUSION

There was significant variation between surgeons' recommendations for resumption of unrestricted range of motion and sports following long fusion with pelvic fixation for ASD. An evidence-based approach to activity recommendations will require information on outcomes and complications.

Multiple-Rod Constructs in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this research was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of multiple-rod constructs vis-a-vis 2-rod constructs in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether the multiple-rod construct outperformed the 2-rod construct. We initially retrieved 357 papers, but only 12 were chosen for further meta-analysis. The rod breakage rates in the multiple-rod and the 2-rod groups were 10.66% and 29.87%, respectively. The multiple-rod construct inhibited rod breakage (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.41; p<0.001), pseudarthrosis (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.50; p<0.001) and rod fracture at the osteotomy site (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.89; p=0.03). Furthermore, the multiple-rod construct reduces the risk of revision surgery (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.73; p=0.04) as well as the revision risk of pseudarthrosis/rod fracture in the multiple- rod group (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.52; p<0.001), but increases the risk of caudal screw loosening (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 1.87-13.30; p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) parameters (p=0.85), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (p=0.09), wound infection (p =0.71), age at surgery (p=0.62), gender distribution (p=0.93), body mass index (p =0.86), smoking status (p=0.05), hospital stay (p=0.09), osteoporosis (p=0.95), CoCr rod material (p=0.15), bone morphogenetic protein-2 (p=0.58), L5/S1 interbody fusion (p=0.07), high-grade osteotomies (p=0.07), the number of fusion levels (p=0.11), operation time (p=0.30), and blood loss volume (p=0.34). Regarding radiographic parameters, only preoperative sagittal vertical axis was found to be higher (weight means difference [WMD], 25.60; 95% CI, 15.43-35.77; p<0.001) in the multiple-rod group. There was no difference in preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (WMD, -3.32; 95% CI, -7.38 to 0.73; p=0.11), but the multiple-rod group had a lower ODI at follow-up (WMD, -7.71; 95% CI, -11.62 to -3.86; p<0.001). Multiple-rod constructs could prevent rod breakage and pseudarthrosis while also lowering the revision rate, resulting in a better clinical outcome than the 2-rod construct. Nonetheless, due consideration should be given to PJK and screw loosening in multiple-rod constructs, possibly due to the increased stiffness caused by the multiple-rod structure.

Pelvic Fixation With a Quad-Rod Technique Using S2 Alar Iliac and Medialized Entry Iliac Screws for Long Fusion Constructs

PURPOSE

Patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) may have risk factors for nonunion and subsequent instrumentation failure. This study reviews a novel surgical technique for a quad-rod construct to the pelvis using both S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screw fixation and medialized entry iliac screw fixation as described through three separate cases and a review of the literature.

METHODS

This technique facilitates alignment of the construct and rod insertion into the tulip heads. The medialized iliac screw technique also avoids the potential soft-tissue complications of the conventional iliac screw bolt given that it is deeper and has more soft-tissue coverage.

RESULTS

Three cases performed by the most senior author (V.A.) in which this novel technique was used are presented in this report along with clinical and radiographic images to educate the reader on appropriate execution of this technique. A review of the existing literature regarding pelvic fixation techniques for ASD was also done.

CONCLUSION

Quad-rod augmentation of long thoracolumbar spinal constructs with two independent SI anchoring points is potentially an effective technique to increase lumbar sacral construct rigidity, thereby promoting fusion rates and decreasing revision rates. The described technique provides spine surgeons with an additional tool in their armamentarium to treat patients with complex ASD.

What Are the Benefits of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) combined with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with that of conventional PSF in the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Spinopelvic parameters, surgical data, complications, and clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were compared between patients with ASD who underwent LLIF combined with PSF (LLIF+PSF group) and those who underwent conventional PSF (only-PSF group).

RESULTS

Ten studies, comprising 621 patients with ASD (313 in the LLIF+PSF group and 308 in the only-PSF group), were included. The level of evidence was III for 7 studies and IV for 3 studies. There was no significant difference in the improvement in the visual analog scale score, systemic complication rate, and revision rate between groups. In the LLIF+PSF group, we noted a superior restoration of lumbar lordosis (weighted mean difference [WMD], 9.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.10 to 12.44, P < .001), pelvic tilt (WMD, -2.50; 95% CI -4.25 to -.75, P = .005), sagittal vertical axis (WMD, -21.92; 95% CI -30.73 to -13.11, P < .001), and C7 plumb line-center sacral vertical line (WMD, -4.03; 95% CI -7.52 to -.54, P = .024); a lower estimated blood loss (WMD, -719.99; 95% CI -1105.02 to -334.96, P < .001) while a prolonged operating time (WMD, 104.89; 95% CI 49.36 to 160.43, P < .001); lower incidence of pseudarthrosis (risk ratio [RR], .26; 95% CI .08 to .79, P = .017) while higher incidence of neurologic deficits (RR, 2.04; 95% CI 1.27 to 3.25, P = .003); and a better improvement in Oswestry Disability Index score (WMD, -7.04; 95% CI -10.155 to -3.93, P < .001) and Scoliosis Research Society-22 total score (WMD, .27; 95% CI .11 to .42, P = .001). The level of evidence in this systematic review and meta-analysis was II.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional PSF, LLIF combined with PSF was associated with superior restoration of sagittal and coronal alignment, lower incidence of pseudarthrosis, better improvement in quality of life, and less surgical invasiveness in the treatment of ASD, albeit at the cost of prolonged surgical times and substantially high incidence of lower extremity symptoms. Surgeons should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of this procedure, and inform patients about its side effects.

Discoplasty as a salvage technique for pseudoarthrosis following multilevel TLIFS: A case report

BACKGROUND

Pseudoarthrosis, often defined as a failure to achieve osseous fusion by the 1-year post-operative time point. Despite its relatively high prevalence, there is still lack of clinical evidence on salvage options for lumbar pseudoarthrosis. Lumbar interbody fusion is generally accepted as a useful surgical treatment for patients with pseudoarthrosis. Several techniques are available to achieve stabilization of the lumbar spine including the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF), direct lateral interbody fusion, posterolateral only (intertransverse) fusion, and facet or pedicle screw/rod placement. We present a case report of discoplasty as a salvage option for pseudoarthrosis following lumbar fusion surgery using multilevel TLIFs.

METHOD

This study is a case report. A female patient, 79 year old, came with recurrent backpain at the lumbar area that got worse during the past 3 months. She underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery of L3-S1 by pedicle screw and transforaminal interbody fusion at the level of L3-S1. Three years later she experienced another episode of back pain and underwent pedicle screws removal to improve her pain. Two years later complaint reappeared. The pain was rated 7/10 in standing position and improved to 5/10 with resting in horizontal position. We followed up this patient for 1 month after surgery.

RESULT

After surgery, VAS score was decreased from 7/10 into 1/10 in standing position and patient was able to stand and walk using a walker. Postoperatively plain radiograph was performed and there was no complication. In a month follow up, the VAS score was 1/10 with ODI score reduces significantly from 38% to 4% showing only minimal disability.

CONCLUSION

Salvage discoplasty for pseudoarthrosis following posterior lumbar fusion surgery is rarely reported, but it appears to be viable option aside from ALIF that results in significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Discoplasty offers a less invasive solution in elderly patients which significantly reduces the symptoms and improves the quality of life of the affected patients.