Surgical increase in thoracic kyphosis predicts increase of cervical lordosis after thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Three-dimensional deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: what are the benefits of hybrid apical sublaminar bands versus all-pedicle screws?

The amount of three-dimensional (3D) correction with apical sublaminar band (hybrid-SLB) technique has not been compared to all-pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using detailed axial correction metrics or comparable rod types. Our purpose is to compare 3D improvement in AIS deformities following posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) with hybrid-SLB and segmental correction to all-pedicle screw correction. Patients ages 10-18 years with AIS who underwent PSIF between 2015 and 2022 and had preoperative and postoperative EOS imaging were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic, Lenke classification, operative technique, and 3D EOS data. Average changes in major and minor Cobb angle, axial rotation, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis were compared. Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria with 55 in the hybrid-SLB group (mean age 14.9 ± 1.9 years) and 40 in all-pedicle screw (mean age 14.7 ± 2.1 years). While all-pedicle screw demonstrated greater correction of major (45.7 ± 13.4 vs 37.9 ± 14.3 degrees; P  = 0.008) and minor (28.7 ± 13.1 vs 17.8 ± 12.5 degrees; P  = 0.001) Cobb angles, hybrid-SLB showed greater increase in T4-T12 kyphosis (13.3 ± 15.3 vs 5.6 ± 13.5 degrees; P  = 0.01). Correction of T1-T12 kyphosis, axial rotation, and lumbar lordosis was similar between groups. 3D EOS analysis of AIS patients before and after PSIF revealed that all-pedicle screw constructs had greater overall coronal plane correction and hybrid-SLB had greater thoracic sagittal plane correction. Axial corrective abilities were similar. Hybrid-SLB may have advantages for correction of thoracic lordosis or hypokyphosis. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

What Are the Medium-term Reciprocal Changes in Cervical Sagittal Alignment After Posterior Correction for Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND

Abnormal cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), typically cervical kyphosis, is more common in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) than in teenagers without AIS. Changes in CSA after posterior spinal fusion for AIS have been observed and may be associated with patient-reported clinical outcomes and age-related cervical disc degeneration. Previous studies have shown inconsistent postoperative reciprocal changes in CSA in patients with single structural thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) AIS (Lenke 5C classification). However, little is known about the medium-term reciprocal changes in CSA after selective posterior TL/L fusion surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine the following: (1) What proportion of patients with Lenke 5C AIS have abnormal CSA before surgery? (2) What were the changes in CSA after selective posterior TL/L fusion surgery in the overall Lenke 5C AIS cohort and in subgroups classified by thoracic kyphosis? (3) What global sagittal parameters were associated with CSA preoperatively and at the latest follow-up? (4) What is the correlation between CSA and Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) scores?

METHODS

We queried our institutional database and identified 186 patients diagnosed with Lenke 5C AIS who underwent selective posterior TL/L fusion surgery from April 2010 to February 2018. Of these, 13% (25) of patients were lost to follow-up before 5 years, and 8% (15) of patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria, leaving 79% (146) of patients for analysis in this retrospective study. During this period, we typically offered selective posterior TL/L fusion surgery to patients with Lenke 5C AIS when the main TL/L Cobb angle exceeded 35°. All patients who were offered surgery for this diagnosis opted to have the procedure. Briefly, the surgical procedure consisted of pedicle screw insertion, multiple-level Ponte osteotomy, and segmental direct vertebral body derotation to correct the deformity. Ninety percent (132 of 146) of the patients were female, with a mean ± SD age of 15 ± 2 years. The mean follow-up time was 7 ± 1 years. All patients had a single structural TL/L curve, with a mean preoperative main TL/L Cobb angle of 43° ± 9°. Radiologic measurements included coronal deformity parameters, cervical sagittal parameters, and global sagittal parameters. SRS-22 scores were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The preoperative cervical sagittal parameters were analyzed to assess the abnormal CSA proportion. Cervical sagittal parameters were compared preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest final follow-up. Based on the degree of thoracic kyphosis, patients were classified into a hypokyphotic group (thoracic kyphosis < 20°) and a normokyphotic group (thoracic kyphosis ≥ 20°), with further comparison of CSA within subgroups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between CSA and global sagittal parameters. Finally, the SRS-22 scores at the latest follow-up were compared between cervical lordosis (defined as CSA > 0°) and cervical kyphosis (defined as CSA < 0°).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight percent (84 of 146) of patients with Lenke 5C AIS had cervical kyphosis before surgery. After selective posterior TL/L fusion surgery, we observed an increase in cervical lordosis (from 5° ± 13° before surgery to 2° ± 12°, mean difference 4° [95% confidence interval (CI) 2° to 5°]; p < 0.001), thoracic kyphosis (from 19° ± 9° before surgery to 28° ± 10°, mean difference -9° [95% CI -11° to -8°]; p < 0.001), and lumbar lordosis (from -48° ± 11° before surgery to -51° ± 14°, mean difference 3° [95% CI 1° to 6°]; p = 0.005) at 5 years of follow-up. Subgroup analysis revealed an increase in CSA in the hypokyphotic group, while no increase was observed in the normokyphotic group. At the preoperative stage, after controlling for potentially confounding variables such as the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis and lumbar lordosis, a correlation was observed between thoracic kyphosis (β = -1.27 [95% CI -1.50 to -1.03]; p < 0.001) and the preoperative CSA. At the latest follow-up, after controlling for potentially confounding variables such as thoracic kyphosis, a correlation was observed between global thoracic kyphosis (β = -0.46 [95% CI -0.85 to -0.08]; p = 0.02) and the follow-up CSA. When we compared patients with cervical kyphosis at the most recent follow-up to those with cervical lordosis, we found no between-group differences in SRS-22 scores between those groups.

CONCLUSION

In light of our findings, surgeons should pay particular attention to preoperative CSA in these patients. For patients with cervical kyphosis and cervical discomfort, if there is concurrent reduction in thoracic kyphosis, it can be communicated that both CSA and thoracic kyphosis are likely to improve postoperatively. Future studies should use more specific outcome measures to assess the correlation between CSA changes and patient-reported clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Outcomes following instrumentation removal after posterior corrective fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the complications and postoperative outcomes of implant removal after posterior fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent implant removal after posterior corrective fixation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between 2002 and 2014. Complications were evaluated in the 116 patients who underwent implant removal at their choice. Radiological evaluations were performed and analyzed in 71 patients who were followed up for > 2 years after implant removal. Moreover, the patients were divided into two groups: those with increased thoracic kyphosis after implant removal and those without.

RESULTS

Overall, 14 of the 116 patients had complications. Two of the three patients with fractures required reoperation. Radiological examination revealed no significant difference in the scoliosis curvature in the coronal plane after implant removal. In the sagittal plane, the lowest instrumented vertebral tilt, cervical lordosis, T1 slope, T1-12 kyphosis angle, and T5-12 kyphosis angle were significantly increased. Moreover, patients with an increased T5-12 kyphosis angle after implant removal had greater pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS) before implant removal.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of complications after implant removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was 12.1%. Spinal alignment is more variable in the sagittal plane than in the coronal plane, and patients with increased thoracic kyphosis after implant removal have greater preoperative PI and SS. Sufficient preoperative explanation is necessary if a patient wishes to undergo implant removal.

Incidence of Cervical Kyphosis and Factors Associated with Improvement in Postoperative Cervical Spinal Alignment in Idiopathic Scoliosis with Major Thoracolumbar/Lumbar and Thoracic Curves

Background: This study aimed to compare the incidence and severity of cervical kyphosis before and after surgery between patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with major thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (Lenke type 5C group) and those with major thoracic curves (Lenke type 1A group). Further, factors associated with cervical spinal alignment changes after surgery in the two groups were examined. Methods: This study included consecutive patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion for Lenke type 1A and 5C curves and who were followed up for at least 1 year. To measure changes in sagittal alignment, all patients underwent radiography before, immediately after, and at 1 year after surgery. The correlation coefficients change the value of the C2-C7 angle before and after surgery (ΔC2-ΔC7) and other spinopelvic parameters were examined. Results: In total, 19 of 30 patients in the Lenke type 1A group and 21 of 36 in the Lenke type 5C group presented with cervical kyphosis preoperatively. Hence, the incidence of cervical kyphosis did not significantly differ between the two groups. Further, the two groups had significantly higher thoracic kyphosis (TK) and greater C2-C7 angles postoperatively. The TK of the Lenke type 5C group further increased at 1 year postoperatively. The Lenke 1A type group presented with a significant re-decrease in the C2-C7 angle at 1 year postoperatively. However, the C2-C7 angle of the Lenke type 5C group did not change. The ΔTK was closely associated with the ΔC2-ΔC7 in the Lenke type 1A group, but not in the Lenke type 5C group. Conclusions: In thoracic AIS, postoperative cervical alignment should achieve an adequate TK and promote correction of the coronal plane curve. Moreover, selective corrective surgery can improve postoperative cervical alignment in lumbar AIS.

Neck and shoulder pain in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 10 years after posterior spinal fusion

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine the clinical significance of neck and shoulder pain (NSP) 10 years after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and the relationship between radiographic parameters and NSP.

METHODS

Of 72 patients who underwent PSF for thoracic AIS (Lenke 1 or 2) between 2000 and 2013, we included 52 (46 females; Lenke type 1 in 34 patients and type 2 in 18; mean age, 25.6 years) who underwent NSP evaluation using visual analog scale (VAS, 10 cm) 10 years postoperatively (follow-up rate, 72.2%). Correlation analyses were performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r).

RESULTS

The VAS for NSP was 2.6 cm in median and 3.4 cm in mean at 10 years. The VAS had significant negative correlations with several SRS-22 domain scores (rs = - 0.348 for pain, - 0.347 for function,  -  0.308 for mental health, and - 0.372 for total) (p < 0.05). In addition, the VAS score was significantly correlated with cervical lordosis (CL) (rs = 0.296), lumbar lordosis (rs = - 0.299), and sacral slope (rs = 0.362) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, at the 10-year follow-up, CL was significantly negatively correlated with T1 slope (rs = - 0.763) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) (- 0.554 for T1-12 and - 0.344 for T5-12) (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

NSP was associated with deterioration in SRS-22 scores, indicating that NSP is a clinically significant long-term issue in PSF for thoracic AIS. Restoring or maintaining the TK and T1 slopes, which are controllable factors during PSF, may improve cervical lordosis and alleviate NSP at 10-year follow-up.

Can Lumbopelvic Parameters Be Used to Predict Thoracic Kyphosis at all Ages? A National Cross-Sectional Study

STUDY DESIGN

National cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic kyphosis (TK) is related to sagittal parameters as pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence (PI). The equation TK = 2 (PT+LL-PI) was validated for adolescents. The purpose of this study was to investigate if this equation correctly predicts TK regardless of age.

METHODS

Sagittal alignment parameters were assessed on full spine radiographs of 2599 individuals without spine pathology (1488 females, 1111 males). Calculated TK (CTK) = 2 (PT+LL-PI) and measured TK (MTK) were compared by calculating the gap and using a linear regression between both parameters. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender, age, TK groups (≤20°, 21°-40°, 41°-60°, >60°), and PI groups (<45°, 45°-60°, >60°).

RESULTS

Average values in the total population were: MTK 45.0°, CTK 36.9°. Average TK gap was 8.1°, 5.2° in females (intercept 11.7, slope .61) and 11.9° in males (intercept 7.1, slope .58). The mean gap was 3.6° for 15-34 years, 5.7° under 15 years and it increased progressively after 35 years with a maximum of 19.9° over 80 years. The gap also increased with the amount of MTK: -3.5° for TK<20° up to 17.3° for TK >60°. Differences in gaps were minor between PI groups. The intercept was smallest and slopes >.6 for PI <45° and TK ≤20°.

CONCLUSION

The formula TK=2 (PT+LL-PI) yielded moderate accuracy for adolescents and young adults, but did not fit for over 35 years and under 15. The amount and variance in TK increased in elderly subjects, which made the formula less accurate.

Increasing Cervical Kyphosis Correlates With Cervical Degenerative Disk Disease in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to investigate the incidence of cervical degenerative disk disease (DDD) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), before surgical intervention.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

AIS is often associated with thoracic hypokyphosis and compensatory cervical kyphosis. In adults, cervical kyphosis is associated with DDD. Although cervical kyphosis has been reported in up to 60% AIS patients, the association with cervical DDD has not been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 of all consecutive AIS patients. Inclusion criteria were AIS patients over 10 years of age with cervical magnetic resonance imaging and anterior-posterior and lateral spine radiographs within 1 year of each other. Magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed for evidence of cervical DDD. Severity of cervical changes were graded using the Pfirrmann classification and by a quantitative measure of disk degeneration, the magnetic resonance signal intensity ratio.

RESULTS

Eighty consecutive patients were included (mean age: 14.1 years, SD=2.5 years). Increasing cervical kyphosis was significantly correlated to decreasing thoracic kyphosis ( r =0.49, P <0.01) and increasing major curve magnitude ( r =0.22, P =0.04). Forty-five patients (56%) had the presence of DDD (grades 2-4) with a mean cervical kyphosis of 11.1° (SD=9.5°, P <0.01). More cervical kyphosis was associated with more severe cervical DDD as graded by Pfirrmann classification level ( P <0.01). Increasing cervical kyphosis was also positively associated with increasing magnetic resonance signal intensity ratio ( P <0.01). Nine patients had ventral cord effacement secondary to DDD with a mean cervical kyphosis of 22.8° (SD=8.6°) compared with 2.6° (SD=11.2°) in those who did not ( P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical kyphosis was significantly associated with increasing severity of cervical DDD in patients with AIS. Patients with evidence of ventral cord effacement had the largest degree of cervical kyphosis with a mean of 22.8±8.6°. This is the first study to evaluate the association between cervical kyphosis in AIS with cervical DDD.

Patient-Specific Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review

The restoration of sagittal alignment is fundamental to the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Despite established techniques, some patients present with inadequate postoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK), which may increase the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and imbalance. There is a lack of knowledge concerning the effectiveness of patient-specific rods (PSR) with measured sagittal curves in achieving a TK similar to that planned in AIS surgery, the factors influencing this congruence, and the incidence of PJK after PSR use. This is a systematic review of all types of studies reporting on the PSR surgical correction of AIS, including research articles, proceedings, and gray literature between 2013 and December 2023. From the 28,459 titles identified in the literature search, 81 were assessed for full-text reading, and 7 studies were selected. These included six cohort studies and a comparative study versus standard rods, six monocentric and one multicentric, three prospective and four retrospective studies, all with a scientific evidence level of 4 or 3. They reported a combined total of 355 AIS patients treated with PSR. The minimum follow-up was between 4 and 24 months. These studies all reported a good match between predicted and achieved TK, with the main difference ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, p > 0.05, despite the variability in surgical techniques and the rods' properties. There was no proximal junctional kyphosis, whereas the current rate from the literature is between 15 and 46% with standard rods. There are no specific complications related to PSR. The exact role of the type of implants is still unknown. The preliminary results are, therefore, encouraging and support the use of PSR in AIS surgery.

Reciprocal Change of Cervical Spine after Posterior Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Reciprocal sagittal alignment changes after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) posterior corrective surgery have been reported in the cervical spine, but the evidence is not yet sufficient. Furthermore, much remains unknown about the effects of cervical kyphosis on clinical outcomes in AIS. Forty-five consecutive patients (4 males and 41 females) with AIS and Lenke type 1 or 2 curves underwent a posterior spinal fusion, and a minimum of 24-month follow-up was collected from our prospective database. We investigated radiographic parameters and SRS-22r. Before surgery, cervical kyphosis (cervical lordosis < 0°) was present in 89% and cervical hyperkyphosis (cervical lordosis < -10°) in 60%. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or Lenke type between the hyperkyphosis and the non-hyperkyphosis groups. Although cervical lordosis increased significantly after surgery, cervical kyphosis was observed in 73% of patients 2 years after surgery. We found a significant correlation between Δthoracic kyphosis (TK) and Δcervical lordosis. Preoperative cervical kyphosis, ΔT1 slope, and ΔTK were independently associated factors for postoperative cervical hyperkyphosis. The cervical hyperkyphosis group had significantly lower SRS-22r domains. In AIS corrective surgery, restoring TK leading to a gain of T1 slope may lead to an improvement of cervical sagittal alignment. Remaining cervical hyperkyphosis after AIS surgery may affect clinical outcomes.

Spinal sagittal alignment and postoperative adding-on in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after surgery

INTRODUCTION

Surgery for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) may change spinal sagittal alignment, and postoperative adding-on may affect spinal sagittal balance after reconstruction. This study was to investigate the effect of surgery on spinal sagittal alignment and the relationship between postoperative adding-on and spinal sagittal balance in patients with AIS.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis of this study was that the effect of surgery on AIS was associated with recovery of the spinal sagittal plane and that presence of postoperative adding-on might affect the spinal sagittal balance. Materials and methods This retrospective study enrolled 22 patients who received surgical treatment. Clinical, imaging and follow-up data were analyzed.

RESULTS

After surgery, T1 slope (T1S) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) were significantly (P<0.05) lower in patients with postoperative adding-on (16.73°±6.12° for T1S and 28.95°±11.3° for TK) than those without adding-on (24.82°±8.59° for T1S and 40.29°±12.08° for TK). At the last follow-up, cervical lordosis (CL), T1S, and TK were significantly (P<0.05) lower in patients with adding-on (3.05°±11.41° for CL, 22.12°±3.68° for T1S, and 37.89°±8.97° for TK) than those without adding-on (15.94°±°13.6 for CL, 28.86°±4.26° for T1S, and 47.64°±7.1° for TK). The Cobb angle was significantly (19.65°±8.69° vs. 50.66°±11.46°; P<0.001) decreased after compared with that before surgery. At the final follow-up, the Cobb angle (26.48°±9.61° vs. 19.65°±8.69°, P<0.001), T1S (24.87°±5.11° vs. 20.04°±8.13°), and TK (41.88°±9.45° vs 33.53°±12.71°) all significantly (P<0.01) increased compared with those immediately after surgery. The Cobb angle significantly (26.48°±9.61° vs. 50.66°±11.46°, P<0.001) decreased while CL, T1S, and TK all significantly (8.32°±13.67° vs 2.47°±14.42° for CL, T1S 24.87°±5.11° vs. 21.28°±5.88° for T1S, and 41.88°±9.45° vs. 33.13°±10.97° for TK, P<0.05) increased at the final follow-up compared with those before surgery.

DISCUSSION

Surgery affects spinal sagittal alignment, and postoperative adding-on may affect spinal sagittal balance after reconstruction. Surgery as the ultimate approach for AIS has good effects but may result in some side effects.

LEVEL OF PROOF

III, retrospective cohort study.

Statistical modelling of how the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and how scoliosis surgery changes that

The relationship between the sagittal shape of the cervical spine and that of the thoracolumbar spine is established in the normal spine. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is recognised as a change in the shape of the spine in both the coronal and sagittal planes. The effects of AIS on the alignment of the cervical spine, including the effects of surgery, has been less well studied. The objective of this study was to identify, using regression analysis, the significant relationships between the alignment of the thoracolumbar spine, in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in AIS. This study used coronal and sagittal radiographic measures from a group with AIS, both pre and post-operatively, which were analysed using multiple linear regression methods to identify significant parameters that explain the sagittal shape of the cervical spine. There were 51 pairs of pre and post-operative radiographs analysed, 40 of which were Lenke 1 curves and 11 Lenke 3 curves. Posterior spinal fusion was performed for all. The significant parameters pre-operatively were T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and SVA with an R2 value of 78%. Post-operatively, the significant parameters were T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and thoracolumbar scoliosis with an R2 of 63%. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in AIS is related to the shape of key parameters in the rest of the spine. Changes in the cervical sagittal shape occur to compensate for changes in shape to the rest of the spine that occur as a consequence of surgery. This has implications for the understanding of how the compensatory mechanisms of the spine are used to maintain a horizontal gaze, along with prediction of the effects of surgery on the shape of the spine.

The Sagittal Plane in Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Sagittal balance is widely recognized as the primary determinant of optimal outcomes in adult spinal deformity. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), coronal correction risks being obtained at the expense of sagittal malalignment after posterior spinal fusion. Apical lordosis, often underestimated on two-dimensional imaging, is the primary deforming factor in AIS. Failure to restore thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis during posterior spinal fusion contributes to problematic early surgical complications, including proximal or distal junctional kyphosis and failure. Although adolescent patients often compensate for sagittal imbalance in the short-term and mid-term, late sequelae of iatrogenic sagittal imbalance include flatback syndrome, disk degeneration, cervical kyphosis, and late decompensation. Objective criteria using spinopelvic parameters and preoperative three-dimensional planning can guide sagittal plane correction during PSF for AIS. Technical caveats can help avoid sagittal plane complications, including instrumentation level selection, anchor type, and anatomic protection of adjacent levels. Other surgical techniques to optimize restoration of thoracic kyphosis include higher implant density, stiffer rod material, Ponte osteotomies, and deformity correction technique.

Do the three-dimensional parameters of brace-wearing patients with AIS change when transitioning from standing to sitting position? A preliminary study on Lenke I

Background

Bracing is the most common conservative treatment for preventing the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in patients with a curve of 25°–40°. X-ray examinations are traditionally performed in the standing position. However, school-age teenagers may take more time to sit. Thus far, little is known about three-dimensional (3D) correction in the sitting position. Hence, this study aimed to determine the effects of standing and sitting positions on 3D parameters during brace correction.

Methods

We evaluated a single-center cohort of patients receiving conservative treatment for thoracic curvature (32 patients with AIS with a Lenke I curve). The 3D parameters of their standing and sitting positions were analyzed using the EOS imaging system during their first visit and after bracing.

Results

At the patients’ first visit, sagittal plane parameters such as thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sacral slope decreased when transitioning from the standing position to the sitting position (standing 29° ± 6°, 42° ± 8°, and 42° ± 8° vs. sitting 22° ± 5°, 27° ± 6°, and 24° ± 4°; p < 0.001), whereas pelvic tilt (PT) increased and sagittal vertical axis shifted forward (standing 9° ± 6° and 1.6 ± 2.7 cm vs. sitting 24° ± 4° and 3.8 ± 2.3 cm; p < 0.001). After bracing, TK and LL decreased slightly (from 29° ± 6° and 42° ± 8° to 23° ± 3° and 38° ± 6°; p < 0.001), whereas the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) value increased (from 3° ± 3° to 11° ± 3°; p < 0.001). When transitioning to the sitting position, similar characteristics were observed during the first visit, except for a subtle increase in the TLJ and PT values (standing 11° ± 3° and 9° ± 4° vs. sitting 14° ± 3° and 28° ± 4°; p < 0.001). Moreover, the coronal and axial parameters at different positions measured at the same time showed no significant change.

Conclusions

In brace-wearing patients with thoracic scoliosis, compensatory sagittal plane straightening may be observed with a slight increase in thoracolumbar kyphosis, particularly when transitioning from the standing position to the sitting position, due to posterior rotation of the pelvis. Our results highlight that sagittal alignment in AIS with brace treatment is not completely analyzed with only standing X-Ray.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800018310).