Can Lumbopelvic Parameters Be Used to Predict Thoracic Kyphosis at all Ages? A National Cross-Sectional Study

STUDY DESIGN

National cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic kyphosis (TK) is related to sagittal parameters as pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence (PI). The equation TK = 2 (PT+LL-PI) was validated for adolescents. The purpose of this study was to investigate if this equation correctly predicts TK regardless of age.

METHODS

Sagittal alignment parameters were assessed on full spine radiographs of 2599 individuals without spine pathology (1488 females, 1111 males). Calculated TK (CTK) = 2 (PT+LL-PI) and measured TK (MTK) were compared by calculating the gap and using a linear regression between both parameters. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender, age, TK groups (≤20°, 21°-40°, 41°-60°, >60°), and PI groups (<45°, 45°-60°, >60°).

RESULTS

Average values in the total population were: MTK 45.0°, CTK 36.9°. Average TK gap was 8.1°, 5.2° in females (intercept 11.7, slope .61) and 11.9° in males (intercept 7.1, slope .58). The mean gap was 3.6° for 15-34 years, 5.7° under 15 years and it increased progressively after 35 years with a maximum of 19.9° over 80 years. The gap also increased with the amount of MTK: -3.5° for TK<20° up to 17.3° for TK >60°. Differences in gaps were minor between PI groups. The intercept was smallest and slopes >.6 for PI <45° and TK ≤20°.

CONCLUSION

The formula TK=2 (PT+LL-PI) yielded moderate accuracy for adolescents and young adults, but did not fit for over 35 years and under 15. The amount and variance in TK increased in elderly subjects, which made the formula less accurate.

Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in degenerative spinal deformity patients

INTRODUCTION

In asymptomatic subjects, variations of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and spinopelvic organization have been reported. A large range of compensation phenomena has been observed in degenerative spinal deformity in order to maintain horizontal gaze, but it remains unclear how age and spinopelvic morphology could additionally influence cervical alignment. The aim of this observational retrospective study was to describe the distribution of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in subjects with and without degenerative spinal deformity in order to precisely evaluate cervical compensation phenomena in adult spinal deformity (ASD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Radiographs of 478 subjects (327 females and 151 males) were distributed into 235 asymptomatic and 243 deformed subjects. Occipito-cervical parameters were McGregor-C1, McGregor-C2, C1-C2 and occipito-C2 angles. The cervicothoracic inflection point (CTIP) was determined. Caudal cervical sagittal alignment parameters were: C2-C7 lordosis, C2-apex (superior arch), apex-CTIP (inferior arch), occipito-C3 and occipito-C4 angles, C7-slope and T1-slope. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference (significant when Pr > 0.975 or Pr < 0.025). Comparisons between asymptomatic and deformed subjects were done after matching on age (40-60 years; > 60 years) and on PI (< 45°; 45-60°; > 60°).

RESULTS

Among occipito-cervical parameters, there was no significant change in McGregor-C1 angle. However, McGregor-C2 angle was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr = 0.0029), with influence of age (Pr = 0.023), but PI influence. C1-C2 lordosis was significantly higher in the ASD group compared to the asymptomatic group (Pr < 0.0007), without influence of age or PI noticed. C2-C7 lordosis was also higher in the ASD group (Pr < 0.025) with a role of age and PI (Pr < 0.025). Cervical lordosis in the superior arch was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr > 0.999), without influence of age or PI. In the inferior arch, the lordosis angle was not modified according to the group, but there was an influence of age (Pr < 0.0007). C7-slope and T1-slope were higher according the age group (Pr < 0.0012), without influence of the group or PI.

CONCLUSION

This observational study highlights cervical sagittal alignment adaptations in degenerative spinal deformity, matched on age and pelvic incidence. The inferior cervical spine seemed to be modified with a higher lordosis, increasing with age responding to the age-related thoracic kyphosis increase. In addition to that, the superior cervical spine hyperextends more in adult degenerative deformity to maintain horizontal gaze.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Proximal and distal mechanical repercussions of instrumentation by double rods and interbody grafts in adult scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

Correction of adult scoliosis by instrumentation with double rods and interbody grafts aims to reduce the risk of pseudarthrosis with rod fracture. An increase in instrumentation rigidity can lead to an increase in stresses at the proximal and distal ends of the construct. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and clinical repercussions of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF) and iliac screw loosening.

MATERIEL AND METHODS

An analysis of patients operated on for adult scoliosis with instrumentation to the pelvis using 4 rods and interbody cages was carried out from a prospective register. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) clinical scores and radiological parameters were collected preoperatively, postoperatively at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. The appearance of PJK, PJF or distal screw loosening was sought; the clinical impact and the risk factors were analyzed by Bayesian inference.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with a mean age of 64.5 years were included. The clinical scores improved significantly (Pr>0.95) at 2 years: VAS back 6.9 versus 2.6, VAS leg 4.9 versus 2.5, ODI 48.2 versus 25.4, SRS-22 2.4 versus 3.5. The radiological parameters were corrected (Pr>0.95): Cobb angle 63.9° versus 22.8°, spinosacral angle (SSA) 112.4° versus 118.8°, T1-pelvic angle (TPA) 24, 8° versus 20.8°, lumbar lordosis 43.8° versus 51.0°, thoracic kyphosis 45.2° versus 53.6°. Thirteen patients (25.5%) presented with PJK and 11 (21.6%) with PJF. Seven patients (13.7%) presented with iliac screw loosening. None of these complications was associated with a significant deterioration in clinical scores. Cranial migration of the lumbar apex increased the risk of distal screw loosening: Odds-Ratio 10.31 (Pr>0.999). Two patients were re-operated on for PJF and one patient for iliac screw loosening (5.9%). No rod fracture with pseudarthrosis was found.

CONCLUSION

Instrumentation with double rods and interbody grafts was associated with a rate of 47.1% of mechanical repercussions at the extremity of the construct. However, these complications were not associated with a significant deterioration in clinical scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Artificial intelligence and treatment algorithms in spine surgery

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a set of theories and techniques in which machines are used to simulate human intelligence with complex computer programs. The various machine learning (ML) methods are a subtype of AI. They originate from computer science and use algorithms established from analyzing a database to accomplish certain tasks. Among these methods are decision trees or random forests, support vector machines along with artificial neural networks. Convolutive neural networks were inspired from the visual cortex; they process combinations of information used in image or voice recognition. Deep learning (DL) groups together a set of ML methods and is useful for modeling complex relationships with a high degree of abstraction by using multiple layers of artificial neurons. ML techniques have a growing role in spine surgery. The main applications are the segmentation of intraoperative images for surgical navigation or robotics used for pedicle screw placement, the interpretation of images of intervertebral discs or full spine radiographs, which can be automated using ML algorithms. ML techniques can also be used as aids for surgical decision-making in complex fields, such as preoperative evaluation of adult spinal deformity. ML algorithms "learn" from large clinical databases. They make it possible to establish the intraoperative risk level and make a prognosis on how the postoperative functional scores will change over time as a function of the patient profile. These applications open a new path relative to standard statistical analyses. They make it possible to explore more complex relationships with multiple indirect interactions. In the future, AI algorithms could have a greater role in clinical research, evaluating clinical and surgical practices, and conducting health economics analyses.

Dynamic global sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Analysis of the effects of decompression surgery on gait adaptations

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) leads patients to adapt their posture and walking parameters. Pelvic retroversion might be a compensation mechanism of pain. Pelvic and lower limbs compensations during gait are still not precisely understood, as well as the effect of a surgical decompression on them. These dynamic parameters can be studied through three-dimensional gait analysis.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is the dynamic pelvic tilt modified after decompression surgery in LSS patients compared to asymptomatic subjects?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

50 asymptomatic subjects (C-group) and 37 patients operated on for lumbar decompression underwent a three-dimensional gait analysis one month before (M0) and six months after (M6) the surgery. 3D gait analysis was performed and hip and knee flexion, trunk kinematics, walking speed, stride length and pelvic tilt during gait or dynamic pelvic tilt (dPT) were recorded. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogic Scales (VAS)) and radiological assessment were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean values of maximum and minimum dPT in the LSS-group preoperatively were significantly higher compared to the C-group (respectively 10.9 (6.2)° versus 7.3 (5.6)°, p = 0.003; 7.7 (6.1)° versus 4.8 (5.8)°, p = 0.011), and were significantly lowered at M6 (respectively 10.9 (6.2)° versus 8.1 (4.8)°, p = 0.0087; and 7.7 (6.1)° versus 5.1 (4.7)°, p = 0.012), and became similar to the C-group. The dPT range of motion at M0 and M6 were similar, and were both significantly higher than control values. Mean values of maximum and minimum hip flexion were significantly higher at M0 compared to the C-group, and were significantly lowered at M6. No difference was found between the pre- and postoperative radiographic pelvic tilt. The VAS for lumbar pain, the VAS for radicular pain and the ODI were significantly decreased at M6.

SIGNIFICANCE

Compared to asymptomatic people, LSS patients walked with a pelvic anteversion, a hip flessum and a knee flessum before surgery, which tended to disappear after the surgical decompression. These differences were not noticed on static radiographs.

Comparison of degenerative lumbar scoliosis correction and risk for mechanical failure using posterior 2-rod instrumentation versus 4-rod instrumentation and interbody fusion

PURPOSE

Four-rod instrumentation and interbody fusion may reduce mechanical complications in degenerative scoliosis surgery compared to 2-rod instrumentation. The purpose was to compare clinical results, sagittal alignment and mechanical complications with both techniques.

METHODS

Full spine radiographs were analysed in 97 patients instrumented to the pelvis: 58 2-rod constructs (2R) and 39 4-rod constructs (4R). Clinical scores (VAS, ODI, SRS-22, EQ-5D-3L) were assessed preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year and last follow-up (average 4.2 years). Radiographic measurements were: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, spinopelvic parameters, segmental lordosis distribution. The incidence of non-union and PJK were investigated.

RESULTS

All clinical scores improved significantly in both groups between preoperative and last follow-up. In the 2R-group, lumbar lordosis increased to 52.8° postoperatively and decreased to 47.0° at follow-up (p = 0.008). In the 4R-group, lumbar lordosis increased from 46.4 to 52.5° postoperatively and remained at 53.4° at follow-up. There were 8 (13.8%) PJK in the 2R-group versus 6 (15.4%) in the 4R-group, with a mismatch between lumbar apex and theoretic lumbar shape according to pelvic incidence. Non-union requiring revision surgery occurred on average at 26.9 months in 28 patients (48.3%) of the 2R-group. No rod fracture was diagnosed in the 4R-group.

CONCLUSION

Multi-level interbody fusion combined with 4-rod instrumentation decreased risk for non-union and revision surgery compared to select interbody fusion and 2-rod instrumentation. The role of additional rods on load sharing still needs to be determined when multiple cages are used. Despite revision surgery in the 2R group, final clinical outcomes were similar in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.