A preliminary assessment of intervertebral disc health and pathoanatomy changes observed two years following anterior vertebral body tethering

Growth modulation increases clinical success in vertebral body tethering

PURPOSE

The relationship between skeletal maturity and postoperative growth modulation (GM) in patients treated with Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is poorly understood. We aimed to: (1) identify preoperative skeletal maturity factors associated with GM, and (2) assess the relationship between GM and postoperative success in patients treated with VBT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed radiographic data from 55 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (2.6 ± 0.5). Changes in standing height and skeletal maturity (Sanders Stage [SS], Triradiate Cartilage [TRC], and Risser Stage [RS]) were assessed at all timepoints. Patients that exhibited GM were defined by ≥ 6° of deformity correction from first erect to any postoperative timepoint. Successful outcomes were defined by a Cobb Angle of ≤ 30° at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

We observed GM in 42% (23 of 55) of patients. GM was influenced by SS (p = 0.017) and TRC (p = 0.013), but not RS (p = 0.104). We observed a successful outcome in 91% of patients that exhibited GM compared to 44% of those that did not (p < 0.001; OR 12.9). No difference was identified in preoperative deformity magnitude or amount of initial correction achieved between patients that did and did not exhibit GM. Patients who exhibited GM had a higher revision rate (30.4%) than when compared to those who did not (3.0%, p = 0.005, OR 9.7).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative success after VBT is directly related to GM. Patients who modulate their deformity are 12.9 times more likely to exhibit a successful outcome and can be identified preoperatively based on SS or TRC.

Analysis of the Biomechanical Effects of Vertebral Body Tethering With Apical Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study by using a multibody simulation approach.

OBJECTIVE

Objectification of spinal biomechanics after vertebral body tethering with and without apical fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral body tethering, a motion-preserving surgical technique for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, is increasingly being used for thoracolumbar curves. However, tether breakage remains a common problem with breakage rates up to 60% for TL curves. Therefore, surgeons have begun to adapt their surgical technique by fusing the apex. The short-term clinical studies show a significant reduction of the tether breakage rate to 10%, but little is known about the biomechanical reasons. Therefore, this study analyzes the intervertebral compression and tether force in a tethered spine without apical fusion and in a tethered spine with apical fusion between L1/2.

METHODS

A multibody simulation approach was chosen to analyze the biomechanical effects of two surgical techniques during different physiological movements. The tether and intervertebral compression forces in the different instrumented segments are once analyzed for a T10 to L3 tethered spine and once for a T10 to L3 tethered with additional L1/2 fusion using an intervertebral cage.

RESULTS

VBT with apical fusion reduces the prevailing tether forces not only at the fused level by nearly 861 N but also at the adjacent spinal segments by around 100 N. However, a significant increase in intervertebral compression force of ~706 N can be observed, especially at the adjacent spinal segments.

CONCLUSION

L1/2 fusion in a tethered spine reduces tether forces in adjacent segments and thus might decrease the rate of tether breakage. However, fusion results in increased intervertebral compression forces by up to 31% compared with an unfused spine. Long-term clinical studies are needed to further analyze and evaluate the biomechanical consequences.

A multibody simulation of the spine for objectification of biomechanical quantities after VBT: a proof of concept and description of baseline data

PURPOSE

Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT), an alternative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, shows satisfactory post-operative results. However, the biomechanical quantities and consequences after VBT surgery remain largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the spinal biomechanics during different motions using a multibody simulation approach.

METHODS

The tether and intervertebral compression forces were simulated in a validated spine model during different physiological movements at different pre-tensions and screw positions, while considering the anatomical muscle and ligament properties.

RESULTS

The simulations showed that an augmentation of the pre-tension and an alteration of the screw position have both significant impact on the intervertebral compression and tether forces. The forces also vary depending on the movement performed, with the highest tether forces measured during lateral bending. In the upright position, with a pre-tension of 200 N, the maximum compression force increases by up to 157% compared to the untethered maximum compression force. The screw position can lead to large differences in the distribution of forces in the spine.

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical data provide a first impression of the forces that occur along the spine during various physiological movements and are consistent with published clinical data. Forces are not evenly distributed along the spine, with higher lumbar forces. The tether forces reach values during lateral bending that can potentially destroy the tether´s integrity and thus may explain the common post-operative complication, namely tether breakage. The results of the model can therefore have an impact on future directions for improved surgical VBT treatment.

Vertebral Body Tethering for Thoracolumbar Curvatures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes at 2-6-Year Follow-Up

Background: The gold standard treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, long-term consequences of PSF can include reduced spinal flexibility, back pain, and intervertebral disc degeneration. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative that preserves motion. We investigated the outcomes of VBT for the treatment of thoracolumbar (TL) major AIS in the largest single-surgeon series with a minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center review. Inclusion criteria were AIS, Lenke 5/6 curvature, and skeletally immature Variables were compared using Student's t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. Results: A total of 37 consecutive patients, age 14.1 ± 1.6 years, 86.5% F, 35.9 ± 11.5-month FU, were examined. Overall, 27 patients (73%) had Lenke 5 and 10 (27%) had Lenke 6 curvatures. Instrumentation of the TL curve alone was performed in 59.5%, and thoracic (T) and TL in 40.5% of patients. Overall, 45.9% of patients had two tethers placed in the TL spine; no patients had double tethers placed at the main thoracic curves. The TL (51 ± 8° to 20 ± 11°; p < 0.0001) and T (37 ± 13° to 17 ± 10°; p < 0.0001) curvatures improved from baseline to the latest FU. Overall, 89% of patients achieved major Cobb < 35°; the three patients who did not experienced at least one cord breakage or required PSF. T5-T12 kyphosis increased (p = 0.0401) and lumbar lordosis was maintained (p = 0.9236). Both the TL inclinometer (16 ± 4º to 4 ± 2°; p < 0.0001) and T (6 ± 4° to 4 ± 3°; p = 0.0036) measurements improved. There was a 49% tether breakage rate as follows: 60% for single-cord TL constructs and 35% for double cords (p = 0.0991). There was an 8.1% re-operation rate as follows: one conversion to T PSF and revision of the TL tether; one release of the T tether and revision of the TL tether; one screw revision for radiculopathy. One patient was re-admitted for poor pain control. Conclusions: Patients with TL major curvature treated with VBT experienced a high rate of clinically successful outcomes with maintenance of lumbar lordosis and relatively low complication rates at the latest FU.

Three-dimensional vertebral shape changes confirm growth modulation after anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate three-dimensional (3D) vertebra and disk shape changes over 2 years following anterior vertebral body tether (AVBT) placement in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

METHODS

Patients with right thoracic IS treated with AVBT were retrospectively evaluated. 3D reconstructions were created from biplanar radiographs. Vertebral body and disk height (anterior, posterior, left and right) and shape (wedging angle) were recorded over the three apical segments in the local vertebral reference planes. Changes in height and wedging were measured through 2 years postoperatively. Change in patient height was correlated with changes in the spine dimensions.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (Risser 0-3, Sanders 2-4) were included. The mean age was 12.2 ± 1.4 years (range 8-14). The mean coronal curve was 51 ± 10° preoperatively, 31 ± 9° at first postoperative time point and 27 ± 11° at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean patient height increased 8 cm by 2 years (p < 0.001). The left side of the spine (vertebra + disc) grew in height by 2.2 mm/level versus 0.7 mm/level on the right side (p < 0.001). This differential growth was composed of 0.5 mm/vertebral level and 1.0 mm/disk level. Evaluation of the change in disk heights showed significantly decreased height anteriorly (- 0.4 mm), posteriorly (- 0.3 mm) and on the right (- 0.5 mm) from FE to 2 years. Coronal wedging reduced 2.3°/level with 1.1°/vertebral level change and 1.2°/disk level. There was no differential growth in the sagittal plane (anterior/posterior height). Patient height change moderately correlated with 3D measures of vertebra + disk shape changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional analysis confirms AVBT in skeletally immature patients results in asymmetric growth of the apical spine segments. The left (untethered) side length increased more than 3 × than the right (tethered) side length with differential effects observed within the vertebral bodies and disks, each correlating with overall patient height change.

Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). There have been few reports on VBT of two curvatures. We aim to compare the radiographic outcomes between VBT and PSF in patients with double curvatures in which both curves were instrumented.

METHODS

29 AIS patients matched by Lenke, age (± 2 years), triradiate cartilage closure status, major Cobb angle (± 8°), and T5-T12 kyphosis (± 10°). Variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Student's t tests, and chi-Square. Clinical success was defined as major curve < 35°.

RESULTS

Group baseline demographics were similar. Major thoracic (T) curve types had significantly better major (VBT 51.5 ± 7.9° to 31.6 ± 12.0° [40%] vs. PSF 54.3 ± 7.4° to 17.4 ± 6.5° [68%]; p = 0.0002) and secondary curve correction in the PSF group. 71% of major T VBT patients were clinically successful versus 100% of PSF. Major thoracolumbar (TL) curve types experienced comparable major (VBT 52.3 ± 7.0° to 18.3 ± 11.4° (65%) vs. PSF 53.0 ± 5.2° to 23.8 ± 10.9° (56%); p = 0.2397) and secondary curve correction. 92% of major TL VBT patients were clinically successful versus 75% in the PSF group. There was no difference in T5-12 kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between groups for any curve type. There were 4 patients (13.8%) with major complications in the VBT group compared to 0 (0%) in the PSF.

CONCLUSION

Patients with double major AIS who underwent VBT with major T curve types had less correction than PSF; however, those with major TL curves experienced similar radiographic outcomes regardless of procedure. Complications were greater for VBT.

Evidence-based Indications for Vertebral Body Tethering in Spine Deformity

Posterior spinal fusion has long been established as an effective treatment for the surgical management of spine deformity. However, interest in nonfusion options continues to grow. Vertebral body tethering is a nonfusion alternative that allows for the preservation of growth and flexibility of the spine. The purpose of this investigation is to provide a practical and relevant review of the literature on the current evidence-based indications for vertebral body tethering. Early results and short-term outcomes show promise for the first generation of this technology. At this time, patients should expect less predictable deformity correction and higher revision rates. Long-term studies are necessary to establish the durability of early results. In addition, further studies should aim to refine preoperative evaluation and patient selection as well as defining the benefits of motion preservation and its long-term effects on spine health to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a recent procedure to correct and reduce spinal curves in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the expected curve reduction and potential complications for adolescent patients after VBT.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched until February 2022. Records were screened against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data sources were prospective and retrospective studies. Demographics, mean differences in Cobb angle, surgical details and complication rates were recorded. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

This systematic review includes 19 studies, and the meta-analysis includes 16 of these. VBT displayed a statistically significant reduction in Cobb angle from pre-operative to final (minimum 2 years) measurements. The initial mean Cobb angle was 47.8° (CI 95% 42.9-52.7°) and decreased to 22.2° (CI 95% 19.9-24.5°). The mean difference is - 25.8° (CI 95% - 28.9-22.7) (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 23% (CI 95% 14.4-31.6%), the most common complication was tether breakage 21.9% (CI 95% 10.6-33.1%). The spinal fusion rate was 7.2% (CI 95% 2.3-12.1%).

CONCLUSION

VBT results in a significant reduction of AIS at 2 years of follow-up. Overall complication rate was relatively high although the consequences of the complications are unknown. Further research is required to explore the reasons behind the complication rate and determine the optimal timing for the procedure. VBT remains a promising new procedure that is effective at reducing scoliotic curves and preventing spinal fusion in the majority of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of Therapeutic Studies with evidence level II-IV.

Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine

PURPOSE

The use of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for the treatment of main thoracic deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients is becoming increasingly more common, but limited data exist on its safety and efficacy in thoracolumbar deformities. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients with thoracolumbar (TL) deformities that were treated with VBT.

METHODS

We assessed clinical and radiographic data from twenty-eight consecutive patients that were surgically managed with VBT, all of whom exhibited a TL deformity with at least two years (mean: 44.7 ± 14.5 months) of postoperative follow-up. Standard radiographic parameters were extracted from left hand wrist and standing posterior-anterior and lateral spine radiographs at various timepoints. Outcome variables were assessed based on preoperative Lenke Classification and included: deformity measures, complications, surgical revisions, and postoperative success.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of instrumentation was 13.4 ± 1.3 years, with an average preoperative Sanders Stage of 4.6 ± 1.4. A significant reduction in preoperative deformities was observed at most postoperative timepoints. A perioperative complication was observed in three patients and surgical revision was required in another four patients. A suspected broken tether was observed in sixteen patients, most of which occurred at the apex of the lumbar deformity. Only one patient required surgical revision due to a suspected broken tether. We observed an overall success rate of 57%, regardless of Lenke Classification.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that VBT can successfully correct TL deformity patterns in 57% of patients without an increase in the rate of perioperative complications, suspected broken tethers, or surgical revisions.

The use of electronic conductivity devices can effectively reduce radiation exposure in vertebral body tethering

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) presents new challenges in respect to radiation exposure, as screws cannot be placed free-hand and the lateral positioning of the patients increases scattered radiation. To reduce radiation exposure, we introduced the use of electronic conductivity device (ECD). These are drilling probes send an audio signal when cortical bone is breached. Thus, anterior, bicortical screws can be placed without multiple fluoroscopic controls. ECD has been used for all VBT procedures at our institution starting April 2020. The aim of this study was to test the safety of ECD and its efficacy in radiation reduction in comparison with the current standard, the fluoroscopic guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent VBT between August 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups according to whether ECD had been used or not. The radiation exposure per procedure and per screw was compared among the two groups, overall and separately for thoracic, lumbar and bilateral procedures. The rate of misplaced screws was calculated.

RESULTS

Data from 62 patients and 825 screws were obtained (397 with ECD). No screw misplacement was observed. Radiation reduction with ECD reached up to 41%. A significant reduction was observed in the radiation per procedure in bilateral instrumentation (from 9.16 to 5.52 mGy*m²), and in the analysis per screw overall (from 9.16 to 5.52 mGy*m²) and for lumbar curves (from 0.54 to 0.32 mGy*m²).

CONCLUSION

ECD can safely and effectively reduce the radiation exposure for VBT procedures.

The preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

VBT is a novel alternative to spinal fusion surgery to treat skeletally immature AIS and was approved to correct idiopathic scoliosis in August 2019 by US Federal Drug Administration (FDA). To systemically review the preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT) in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were queried up to January 2022 for articles regarding VBT. Basic characteristics of patients, changes of radiographic parameters in coronal and sagittal planes, and clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of VBT including complication and revision rates were summarized.

RESULTS

Twenty five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (23/25) included patients with only skeletal immaturity. The average % correction of the main/tethered curve at final follow-up, and % correction of thoracic kyphosis at final follow-up were reported to be 15.6-106.5% and - 31.8 to 20.0%, respectively. The most common complications for VBT were tether breakage (n = 145;21.3%), pulmonary complications (n = 49; 6.9%), and overcorrection (n = 30; 4.2%). The revision rate was 13.1%.

CONCLUSION

VBT could effectively and safely correct spinal deformity in skeletally immature patients with AIS and preserve the motion and growth of the spine. However, VBT has a relatively high complication and revision rates. Therefore, surgeons should cautiously consider VBT for treating AIS. Future research efforts are needed to lower the complication and revision rates. Whatever, VBT is still in its infancy and may have a promising future as a non-fusion solution for AIS.

The timing of tether breakage influences clinical results after VBT

INTRODUCTION

Tether breakage is a frequent mechanical complications after vertebral body tethering (VBT), but not all patients with a breakage show loss of correction. The reason of this clinical finding has not yet been clarified. We hypothesized that the integrity of the tether is relevant only in the early stages after VBT, when it drives growth modulation and tissue remodelling. After these mechanisms have taken place, the tether loses its function and a breakage will not alter the new shape of the spine. Thus, tether breakage would have a greater clinical relevance when occurring shortly after surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent VBT and had a min. 2-year follow-up were included. The difference in curve magnitude between the 1st standing x-ray and the last follow-up was calculated (ΔCobb). For each curve, the presence and timing of tether breakage were recorded. The curves were grouped according to if and when the breakage was observed (no breakage, breakage at 0-6 months, 6-12 months, > 12 months). The ΔCobb was compared among these groups with the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Data from 152 curves were available: 68 with no breakage, 12 with a breakage at 0-6 months, 37 at 6-12 months and 35 > 12 months. The ANOVA found significant difference in the ΔCobb among the groups (Sum of square 2553.59; degree of freedom 3; mean of square 851.1; Fisher test 13.8; P < 0.0001). Patients with no breakage or breakage at > 12 months had similar ΔCobb (mean 4.8° and 7.8°, respectively, P = 0.3), smaller than the 0-6 or 6-12 groups (15.8° and 13.8°, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Tether breakage leads to a consistent loss of correction when occurring within the first 12 months, while it has limited clinical relevance when occurring later on.

Vertebral Body Tethering: Indications, Surgical Technique, and a Systematic Review of Published Results

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) represents a new surgical technique to correct idiopathic scoliosis using an anterior approach, spinal instrumentation with vertebral body screws, and a cable compressing the convexity of the curve. According to the Hueter-Volkmann principle, compression reduces and distraction increases growth on the growth plates. VBT was designed to modulate spinal growth of vertebral bodies and hence, the term ‘growth modulation’ has also been used. This review describes the indications and surgical technique of VBT. Further, a systematic review of published studies was conducted to critically evaluate the results and complications of this technique. In a total of 23 included studies on 843 patients, the preoperative main thoracic curve corrected from 49 to 23 degrees in a minimum 2 year follow-up. The complication rate of VBT was 18%. The results showed that 15% of VBT patients required reoperations for pulmonary or tether-related issues (10%) and less than 5% required conversion to spinal fusion. While the reported median-term results of VBT appear promising, long-term results of this technique are currently lacking.

Innovation With Ethics in Pediatric Orthopaedics

Surgeons should thoughtfully consider whether to introduce a new procedure into their practice. Considerations include the severity of the condition, potential risk of harm, treatment alternatives, patient population, ability to appropriately consent patient/families, and available clinical and institutional resources as well as published evidence and regulatory status. Whenever possible, new procedures should be standardized, studied, and reported upon so that the greater community can learn from experience and refine the indications to minimize risks for future patients. Small scale innovation can readily be introduced into practice. Surgeons should always strive to systemically study new procedures so as to be able to assess benefits and effects.

As Vertebral Body Tethering Impacts Missouri, New Technology Grows in the Right Direction

All eleven-year-old girls want to do is play and be active like every other child her age. Yet, the ability to have a normal childhood for one of our patients became a concern when she and her parents noticed an abnormal lateral curvature in her spine, which was later diagnosed as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In February 2014, she presented with a 45° thoracic deformity with a high risk of progression. At that time, the gold standard for the treatment of her deformity was a posterior spinal fusion - a surgical treatment she nor her parents were interested in pursuing. After their initial appointment, her parents scoured the internet and discovered a new non-fusion surgical technique, known as vertebral body tethering, that might correct their daughter's deformity without the need for titanium rods in her spine. In April 2014, that same eleven-year-old girl underwent vertebral body tethering of her main thoracic deformity from T5 to L1 under the care and management of Dr. Daniel Hoernschemeyer, a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon, with the University of Missouri's Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Today, she is a healthy young adult who is thinking more about prom than about her scoliosis.