Differential vertebral body growth is maintained after vertebral body tethering surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: 4-year follow-up on 888 peri-apical vertebrae and 592 intervertebral discs

PURPOSE

To radiographically evaluate if vertebral body tethering (VBT) can maintain differential peri-apical vertebral growth at medium-term follow-up of 4 years.

METHODS

A prospective, international, multicenter database was queried to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with thoracic VBT. Concave vs. convex vertebral body height, vertebral wedging, and disc wedging of the 3 peri-apical vertebrae were measured by two independent observers at 5 timepoints (pre-operative to 4-year follow-up).

RESULTS

65 skeletally immature patients (60 female, mean 12.8 years old, 21 with open triradiate cartilages) met inclusion criteria. Mean pre-operative maximum scoliosis of 50 ± 8° decreased significantly post-operatively to 27 ± 9° (p < 0.001), which remained stable at 4-year follow-up 30 ± 17° (p = 0.38 vs. post-operative). Mean instrumented scoliosis was 21 ± 14° at 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different than 4-year maximum scoliosis (p < 0.001). Mean pre-operative kyphosis of 30 ± 12° did not significantly change post-operatively (p = 1.0) and remained stable at 4-year follow-up (35 ± 18°; p = 0.05). Mean individual convex vertebral height increased from 17.7 ± 1.9 mm to 19.8 ± 1.5 mm (p < 0.001), while mean individual concave height increased from 14.8 ± 1.9 mm to 17.6 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001). Summing the peri-apical heights, the difference in height from pre-operative to 4-year follow-up was greater on the concave (8.3 ± 4.7 mm) than on the convex side (6.2 ± 4.7 mm) (p < 0.001). Mean individual vertebral wedging decreased from 6 ± 2° at pre-operative to 4 ± 2° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean total vertebral and disc wedging started at 29 ± 7° pre-operatively, decreased to 16 ± 6° at post-operative (p < 0.001), then further decreased to 14 ± 8° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with open triradiate cartilages at the time of surgery had a larger height change over the 4 years compared to those with closed triradiate cartilages (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with VBT demonstrated differential vertebral growth which was maintained at minimum 4-year follow-up. This effect was more pronounced in patients whose triradiate cartilages were open at the time of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Vertebral body tethering for Lenke 1A curves: the lumbar modifier predicts less optimal outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The addition of the L4 "AR" and "AL" lumbar modifier for Lenke 1A idiopathic scoliosis (IS) has been shown to direct treatment in posterior spinal fusion; however, its utility in vertebral body tethering (VBT) has yet to be evaluated.

METHODS

A review of a prospective, multicenter database for VBT in IS was performed for patients with Lenke 1A deformities and a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients were categorized by their lumbar modifier (AR vs AL). Less optimal VBT outcome (LOVO) was defined as a final coronal curve > 35°, lumbar adding-on, or revision surgery for deformity progression or adding-on.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria (81% female, mean 12.6 years), with 55.6% being AL curves. Overall, there were 23 instances of tether breakage (23.3%) and 20 instances of LOVO (20.2%). There was a higher rate of LOVO in AR curves (31.8% vs 10.9%, P = 0.01). Patients with LOVO had greater preoperative deformity, greater apical translation, larger coronal deformity on first erect radiographs, and less coronal deformity correction. Failure to correct the deformity < 30° on first erect was associated with LOVO, as was LIV selection short of the last touch vertebra (TV). Independent risk factors for LOVO included AR curves (OR 3.4; P = 0.04) and first erect curve magnitudes > 30 degrees (OR 6.0; P = 0.002).

DISCUSSION

There is a 20.2% rate of less optimal VBT following VBT for Lenke 1A curves. AR curves are independently predictive of less optimal outcomes following VBT and require close attention to LIV selection. Surgeons should consider achieving an initial coronal correction < 30 degrees and extending the LIV to at least the TV to minimize the risk of LOVO.

Automated measurements of interscrew angles in vertebral body tethering patients with deep learning

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Vertebral body tethering is the most popular nonfusion treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The effect of the tether cord on the spine can be segmentally assessed by comparing the angle between two adjacent screws (interscrew angle) over time. Tether breakage has historically been assessed radiographically by a change in adjacent interscrew angle by greater than 5° between two sets of imaging. A threshold for growth modulation has not yet been established in the literature. These angle measurements are time consuming and prone to interobserver variability.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop an automated deep learning algorithm for measuring the interscrew angle following VBT surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Single institution analysis of medical images.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We analyzed 229 standing or bending AP or PA radiographs from 100 patients who had undergone VBT at our institution.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physiologic Measures: An image processing algorithm was used to measure interscrew angles.

METHODS

A total of 229 standing or bending AP or PA radiographs from 100 VBT patients with vertebral body tethers were identified. Vertebral body screws were segmented by hand for all images and interscrew angles measured manually for 60 of the included images. A U-Net deep learning model was developed to automatically segment the vertebral body screws. Screw label maps were used to develop and tune an image processing algorithm which measures interscrew angles. Finally, the completed model and algorithm pipeline was tested on a 30-image test set. Dice score and absolute error were used to measure performance.

RESULTS

Inter- and Intra-rater reliability for manual angle measurements were assessed with ICC and were both 0.99. The segmentation model Dice score against manually segmented ground truth across the 30-image test set was 0.96. The average interscrew angle absolute error between the algorithm and manually measured ground truth was 0.66° and ranged from 0° to 2.67° in non-overlapping screws (N=206). The primary modes of failure for the model were overlapping screws on a right thoracic/left lumbar construct with two screws in one vertebra and overexposed images. An algorithm step which determines whether an overlapping screw was present correctly identified all overlapping screws, with no false positives.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated an algorithm which measures interscrew angles for radiographs of vertebral body tether patients with an accuracy of within 1° for the majority of interscrew angles. The algorithm can process five images per second on a standard computer, leading to substantial time savings. This algorithm may be used for rapid processing of large radiographic databases of tether patients and could enable more rigorous definitions of growth modulation and cord breakage to be established.

Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces motion of the spine and influences coupled motion: a finite element analysis

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a novel fusionless treatment option for selected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients which is gaining widespread interest. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of tether pre-tension within VBT on the biomechanics of the spine including sagittal and transverse parameters as well as primary motion, coupled motion, and stresses acting on the L2 superior endplate. For that purpose, we used a calibrated and validated Finite Element model of the L1-L2 spine. The VBT instrumentation was inserted on the left side of the L1-L2 segment with different cord pre-tensions and submitted to an external pure moment of 6 Nm in different directions. The range of motion (ROM) for the instrumented spine was measured from the initial post-VBT position. The magnitudes of the ROM of the native spine and VBT-instrumented with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N were, respectively, 3.29°, 2.35°, 1.90° and 1.61° in extension, 3.30°, 3.46°, 2.79°, and 2.17° in flexion, 2.11°, 1.67°, 1.33° and 1.06° in right axial rotation, and 2.10°, 1.88°, 1.48° and 1.16° in left axial rotation. During flexion-extension, an insignificant coupled lateral bending motion was observed in the native spine. However, VBT instrumentation with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N generated coupled right lateral bending of 0.85°, 0.81°, and 0.71° during extension and coupled left lateral bending of 0.32°, 0.24°, and 0.19° during flexion, respectively. During lateral bending, a coupled extension motion of 0.33-0.40° is observed in the native spine, but VBT instrumentation with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N generates coupled flexion of 0.67°, 0.58°, and 0.42° during left (side of the implant) lateral bending and coupled extension of 1.28°, 1.07°, and 0.87° during right lateral bending, respectively. Therefore, vertebral body tethering generates coupled motion. Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces the motion of the spine.

Bilateral vertebral body tethering: identifying key factors associated with successful outcomes

PURPOSE

The treatment of operative double major pediatric spinal deformities (e.g., Lenke 3 or 6) with bilateral vertebral body tethering (VBT) can be significantly more challenging when compared to other deformity patterns (e.g., Lenke 1) or treatment with a posterior spinal fusion. We aimed to identify preoperative and perioperative characteristics that were associated with successful postoperative outcomes in patients treated with both a thoracic and thoracolumbar (e.g., bilateral) tether.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed radiographic and clinical data from patients enrolled in a large multi-center study who had a minimum postoperative follow-up of two years. Standard radiographic parameters were extracted from standing spine and left hand-wrist radiographs at various timepoints. We classified patients based on their preoperative deformity pattern (Primary Thoracic [TP] vs. Primary Thoracolumbar [TLP]) and assessed: (1) deformity balance, (2) tilt of the transitional vertebra, and (3) postoperative success.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from thirty-six patients (TP: 19 and TLP: 17). We observed no relationship between deformity balance at first erect and postoperative success (p = 0.354). Patients with a horizontal transitional vertebra at first erect were significantly (p = 0.001) more likely to exhibit a successful outcome when compared to those who exhibited a tilted transitional vertebra (83% vs. 62%). Patients who had TLP were also more likely to exhibit a successful outcome when compared to patients who exhibited TP (76% vs. 50%).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that double major deformities can be successfully treated with VBT, particularly for those who exhibit TLP.

Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). There have been few reports on VBT of two curvatures. We aim to compare the radiographic outcomes between VBT and PSF in patients with double curvatures in which both curves were instrumented.

METHODS

29 AIS patients matched by Lenke, age (± 2 years), triradiate cartilage closure status, major Cobb angle (± 8°), and T5-T12 kyphosis (± 10°). Variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Student's t tests, and chi-Square. Clinical success was defined as major curve < 35°.

RESULTS

Group baseline demographics were similar. Major thoracic (T) curve types had significantly better major (VBT 51.5 ± 7.9° to 31.6 ± 12.0° [40%] vs. PSF 54.3 ± 7.4° to 17.4 ± 6.5° [68%]; p = 0.0002) and secondary curve correction in the PSF group. 71% of major T VBT patients were clinically successful versus 100% of PSF. Major thoracolumbar (TL) curve types experienced comparable major (VBT 52.3 ± 7.0° to 18.3 ± 11.4° (65%) vs. PSF 53.0 ± 5.2° to 23.8 ± 10.9° (56%); p = 0.2397) and secondary curve correction. 92% of major TL VBT patients were clinically successful versus 75% in the PSF group. There was no difference in T5-12 kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between groups for any curve type. There were 4 patients (13.8%) with major complications in the VBT group compared to 0 (0%) in the PSF.

CONCLUSION

Patients with double major AIS who underwent VBT with major T curve types had less correction than PSF; however, those with major TL curves experienced similar radiographic outcomes regardless of procedure. Complications were greater for VBT.

Vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review

PURPOSE

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) remains the most common type of pediatric scoliosis, mostly affecting children between ages 10 and 18. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) offers a non-fusion alternative to the gold standard spinal fusion that permits flexibility and some growth within instrumented segments. This article will serve as a comprehensive literature review of the current state-of-the-art of VBT in relation to radiographic and clinical outcomes, complications, and the learning curve associated with the procedure.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from April 2002 to December 2022. Studies were included if they discussed VBT and consisted of clinical studies in which a minimum 2-years follow-up was reported, and series that included anesthetic considerations, learning curve, and early operative morbidity.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies spanning the period from April 2002 to December 2022 were reviewed.

CONCLUSION

This article illustrates the potential benefits and challenges of the surgical treatment of AIS with VBT and can serve as a basis for the further study and refinement of this technique ideally as a living document that will be updated regularly.

Clinical experience and complications with limited pleural dissection combined with a novel, simplified technique for thoracic Redon-like drain in vertebral body tethering

PURPOSE

To report on our experience with a simplified, suction-bottle-drain technique of thoracic drain (Redon-like) combined with fully thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering (VBT) and a limited pleural approach, with particular focus on the rate of pulmonary complications.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients who underwent VBT for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. For all subjects, a 10G Redon drain, an active drain system consisting of a perforated tube and a suction bottle, was placed intrathoracically and tunneled under the skin. All drains were removed on the first postoperative day. Perioperative and postoperative data such as type of access, length of surgery, amount of fluid collection in the drain, and length of hospital stay were collected. The type and number of pulmonary complications occurring in the first 3 months after surgery, along with their symptoms and management, were recorded.

RESULTS

One Hundred eighty-two patients were included in the analysis. The mean length of surgery was 97 min (75-120). The average fluid collection in the drain was 30 ml (5-50), the mean length of hospital stay was 3 days (2-4). During the observation period, pulmonary complications occurred in five patients (2%). Two patients presented an aseptic right pleural effusion; for two patients, a residual pneumothorax was diagnosed on the X-rays in the recovery room and one patient developed a chylothorax. All patients recovered without sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The simplified, Redon-like drain combined with a fully thoracoscopic VBT and limited pleural approach seems a safe and effective alternative to the chest drain. This technique allows to remove the drain on the first postoperative day, thus simplifying the management of the patients and improving their comfort.

Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a recent procedure to correct and reduce spinal curves in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the expected curve reduction and potential complications for adolescent patients after VBT.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were searched until February 2022. Records were screened against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data sources were prospective and retrospective studies. Demographics, mean differences in Cobb angle, surgical details and complication rates were recorded. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

This systematic review includes 19 studies, and the meta-analysis includes 16 of these. VBT displayed a statistically significant reduction in Cobb angle from pre-operative to final (minimum 2 years) measurements. The initial mean Cobb angle was 47.8° (CI 95% 42.9-52.7°) and decreased to 22.2° (CI 95% 19.9-24.5°). The mean difference is - 25.8° (CI 95% - 28.9-22.7) (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 23% (CI 95% 14.4-31.6%), the most common complication was tether breakage 21.9% (CI 95% 10.6-33.1%). The spinal fusion rate was 7.2% (CI 95% 2.3-12.1%).

CONCLUSION

VBT results in a significant reduction of AIS at 2 years of follow-up. Overall complication rate was relatively high although the consequences of the complications are unknown. Further research is required to explore the reasons behind the complication rate and determine the optimal timing for the procedure. VBT remains a promising new procedure that is effective at reducing scoliotic curves and preventing spinal fusion in the majority of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of Therapeutic Studies with evidence level II-IV.

Radiographic and perioperative outcomes following anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering: a pilot series

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

 In patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of main thoracic and lumbar spine regions, combined anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering (ATVBT/PLST) is a novel non-fusion treatment option for growth modulation and conservation of motion.

METHODS

 Fourteen patients with AIS who underwent ATVBT/PLST with at least 2-year follow-up were included. Primary outcomes included quality of life as assessed by SRS-22 instruments, radiographic analysis, and revision operations. We secondarily reported perioperative metrics and post-operative opiate morphine equivalents (OME). Clinical success was defined as patients who achieved skeletal maturity with ≤ 30° curve magnitude of both their main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and who did not undergo posterior spine instrumentation and fusion (PSIF).

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 11.6 years (range 10-14 years), majority were girls (92%), and mean follow-up was 3.0 years (range 2-4.8 years). All patients were skeletally immature with a Risser ≤ 2. Included curves were Lenke 1C, 3C, or 6C. Mean preoperative curve magnitudes were 53° ± 8° (range 45°-65°) main thoracic and 49° ± 9° (range 40°-62°) thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. At most recent follow-up, patients had a mean main thoracic curve of 29° ± 8° (range 15°-40°) and a mean thoracolumbar/lumbar curve of 20° ± 15° (range 4°-35°). 50% required a revision operation. Cable breakage occurred in 43%, which did not always require revision. One patient progressed to thoracic fusion, but no patient underwent lumbar fusion. Patients had a mean SRS-22 outcome score of 4.2 ± 0.4.

CONCLUSIONS

ATVBT/PLST is a potential alternative to spine fusion for select immature patients with AIS at a minimum 2-year follow-up. ATVBT/PLST potentially offers motion conservation at the cost of a higher revision rate. Further study and reporting of results are necessary to refine indications and techniques, which in turn will improve outcomes of this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-Case series without comparative group.

Pre-operative parameters influencing vertebral body tethering outcomes: patient's characteristics play an important role in determining the outcomes at a minimum of 2 years post-op

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine preoperative predictors of good radiographic outcomes in VBT patients at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

From a single-center dataset, we reviewed patients who underwent VBT from January 2014 to November 2018. Data analysis included age, gender, Risser grade and biometric data. Radiographically, maximum Cobb angle, C-DAR and apical vertebral and disc wedging were measured preop and at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two cohorts following two different outcome measures: (1) vertebral growth modulation, those patients that growth modulated or corrected ≥ 5° and those who did not; and (2) Maximum Cobb angle at 2 years, < and ≥ 40°. Student T and Chi2 tests were used for comparison and a multiple linear correlation test was implemented between statistically significant variables.

RESULTS

79 patients were recruited. 26 patients (33%) did growth modulate their spine at 2-year follow-up. These patients were significantly younger, and more skeletally immature with less height (147 cm vs 155 cm; p < 0.0001), weight (38 kg vs. 45 kg; p = 0.0009) and BMI (17 vs 18.8; p = 0.0229) as those who did not. Multiple linear regression model with these variables resulted in a moderate correlation (r2 = 0.234). 67 patients (85%) finished at a 2-year follow-up with a maximum Cobb angle < 40°. These patients were also younger and skeletally immature. We found significant differences in outcome 2 regarding the average preoperative maximum Cobb angle (48.5° ± 9.5 vs. 59.1° ± 10), average C-DAR (7 ± 1.5 vs. 8.5 ± 2.1), average apical vertebral wedging (6.5° vs. 8.3°), average vertebral/disc wedging ratio (1.5 vs. 2.4) and the average immediate postoperative Cobb angle (25° vs. 38°). These variables predicted a 36% of the variation in final Cobb angle measurement at a 2-year follow-up (r2 = 0.362).

CONCLUSION

Curve severity determined by a preoperative C-DAR, preoperative Cobb angles and immediate postoperative Cobb angle are significantly related to curves < 40° at a minimum 2-year follow-up, while the potential to growth modulate the spine is more dependent on skeletal maturity, lower body weight and lower BMI. These patients' characteristics should be considered preoperatively.

Biomechanical modeling and assessment of lumbar vertebral body tethering configurations

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless spinal growth modulation technique, which shows promise for pediatric idiopathic scoliosis (IS) curve correction. This technique, mainly used for thoracic curves, is increasingly being used to treat lumbar curves in order to preserve spine flexibility. It remains necessary to adequately define the cord tension to be applied during the operation and the instrumented levels to biomechanically predict correction over time for the lumbar spine.

METHODS

Twelve pediatric patients with lumbar IS, treated with lumbar-only or lumbar and thoracic VBT, were selected for this study. Three independent variables were tested alternately using a patient-specific finite element model (FEM), which includes an algorithm modeling vertebra growth and spine curve changes due to growth modulation for 24 months post-operatively according to the Hueter-Volkmann principle. Parameters included cable tensioning (150N/250N), upper instrumented level (actual UIV, UIV-1) and lower instrumented level (actual LIV, LIV + 1). Each FEM was personalized using 3D radiographic reconstruction and flexibility supine radiographs.

RESULT

An increase in cord tension (from 150 to 250N) had significant effects on main thoracic and thoraco-lumbar/lumbar Cobb angles, as well as on lumbar lordosis, after surgery (supplementary average correction of 3° and 8°, and increase of 1.4°, respectively) and after 24 months (4°, 10° and 1.1°) (p < 0.05). Adding a level to the actual UIV or LIV did not improve correction.

CONCLUSION

This parametric study showed that cord tension is the most important biomechanical parameter on the simulated immediate and 2-year increase in lumbar curve correction. Our preliminary model suggests that it is not advantageous to add additional instrumented levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This computational study uses a retrospective validation cohort (level of evidence 3).

Analgesic options for anterior approach to scoliosis repair: a scoping review

PURPOSE

The ideal analgesic regimen for the anterior approach to scoliosis repair is not clearly defined. The purpose of the study was to summarize and identify gaps in the current literature specific to the anterior approach to scoliosis repair.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in July 2022 utilizing PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases guided by the PRISMA-ScR framework.

RESULTS

The database search generated 641 possible articles, 13 of which met all inclusion criteria. All articles focused on the effectiveness and safety of regional anesthetic techniques, while a minority also provided both opioid and non-opioid medication frameworks.

CONCLUSION

Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA) is the most well-studied intervention for pain control in anterior scoliosis repair, but other, more novel regional anesthetic techniques offer safe and effective potential alternatives. More research is indicated to compare the effectiveness of different regional techniques and perioperative medication regimens specific to anterior scoliosis repair.

Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine

PURPOSE

The use of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for the treatment of main thoracic deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients is becoming increasingly more common, but limited data exist on its safety and efficacy in thoracolumbar deformities. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients with thoracolumbar (TL) deformities that were treated with VBT.

METHODS

We assessed clinical and radiographic data from twenty-eight consecutive patients that were surgically managed with VBT, all of whom exhibited a TL deformity with at least two years (mean: 44.7 ± 14.5 months) of postoperative follow-up. Standard radiographic parameters were extracted from left hand wrist and standing posterior-anterior and lateral spine radiographs at various timepoints. Outcome variables were assessed based on preoperative Lenke Classification and included: deformity measures, complications, surgical revisions, and postoperative success.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of instrumentation was 13.4 ± 1.3 years, with an average preoperative Sanders Stage of 4.6 ± 1.4. A significant reduction in preoperative deformities was observed at most postoperative timepoints. A perioperative complication was observed in three patients and surgical revision was required in another four patients. A suspected broken tether was observed in sixteen patients, most of which occurred at the apex of the lumbar deformity. Only one patient required surgical revision due to a suspected broken tether. We observed an overall success rate of 57%, regardless of Lenke Classification.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that VBT can successfully correct TL deformity patterns in 57% of patients without an increase in the rate of perioperative complications, suspected broken tethers, or surgical revisions.

Biomechanics of the tether breakage: tensile behaviour of a single-unit vertebral body tethering construct

PURPOSE

Tether breakage was reported as the most common complication of vertebral body tethering. However, as the literature suggests the physiological loads do not have the potential to cause the failure of the tether. Currently, the biomechanical reason behind the tether breakage is unknown. The current study aims to elucidate the effects of the tension forces on the failure mechanisms of the VBT and provide mechanical justification for how it can be identified radiographically.

METHODS

Tensile tests (20%/min strain rate) were performed on single-unit VBT samples. Failure modes and mechanical characteristics were reported.

RESULTS

The failure took place prematurely due to the slippage of the tether at the screw-tether junction where the tether is damaged significantly by the locking cap. Slippage was initiated at 10-13% tensile strain level where the tensile stress and tension force were 50.4 ± 1.5 MPa and 582.2 ± 30.8 N, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The failure occurs because of high-stress concentrations generated within the locking region which damages the tether surface and leads to the slippage of the tether. We observed that the loads leading to failure are within the physiological limits and may indicate the high likelihood of the tether breakage. The failure mode observed in our study is shown to be the dominant failure mode, and a design improvement on the gripping mechanism is suggested to avoid failure at the screw-tether junction. We observed that the tether elongates 10-13% prior to the breakage, which can be employed as a diagnostic criterion to screen for tether breakages radiographically.

Concave and convex growth do not differ over tethered vertebral segments, even with open tri-radiate cartilage

PURPOSE

To assess the following hypotheses related to vertebral body tethering (VBT): 1. VBT is associated with asymmetric (concave > convex) increases in height over the instrumented vertebra. 2. The instrumented Cobb angle improves following VBT surgery with growth.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of pediatric patients from a multicenter scoliosis registry treated with VBT between 2013 to 2021.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

patients with standing radiographs at < 4 months and ≥ 2 years after surgery. Distances between the superior endplate of the UIV and the inferior endplate of the LIV were measured at the concave corner, mid-point, and convex corner of the endplates. The UIV-LIV angle was recorded. Subgroup analyses included comparing different Risser scores and tri-radiate cartilage (TRC) closed versus open using student t-tests.

RESULTS

83 patients met inclusion criteria (92% female; age at time of surgery 12.5 ± 1.4 years) with mean follow-up time of 3.8 ± 1.4 years. Risser scores at surgery were: 0 (n = 33), 1 (n = 12), 2 (n = 10), 3 (n = 11), 4 (n = 12), and 5 (n = 5). Of the 33 Risser 0 patients, 17 had an open TRC, 16 had a closed TRC. The UIV-LIV distance at concave, middle, and convex points significantly increased from immediate post-op to final-follow-up for Risser 0 patients, but not for Risser 1-5 patients. Increases in UIV-LIV distance were not significantly different between concave, middle, and convex points for all groups. There was no significant improvement or worsening in UIV-LIV angle for any group.

CONCLUSION

At a mean of 3.8 years following VBT, 33 Risser 0 patients demonstrated significant growth in the instrumented segment, though there was no difference between concave or convex growth, even for patients with open TRC.

Thoracolumbar curve behavior after selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering in Lenke 1A vs Lenke 1C curve patterns

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospective database.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and truncal balance in patients treated with selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) with Lenke 1A vs 1C curves at a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate equivalent thoracic curve correction and reduced thoracolumbar/lumbar curve correction compared to Lenke 1A curves. Additionally, at the most recent follow-up, both curve types demonstrate comparable coronal alignment at C7 and the lumbar curve apex, though 1C curves have better alignment at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Rates of revision surgery are equivalent between the two groups.

METHODS

A matched cohort of 43 Risser 0-1, Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) 2-5 AIS pts with Lenke 1A (1A group)and 19 pts with Lenke 1C curves (1C group) treated with selective thoracic AVBT and a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included. Digital radiographic software was used to assess Cobb angle and coronal alignment on preoperative, postoperative and subsequent follow-up radiographs. Coronal alignment was assessed by measuring the distance from the center sacral vertical line (CSVL) to the midpoint of the LIV, apical vertebra for thoracic and lumbar curves and C7.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the thoracic curve measured preoperatively, at first erect, pre-rupture or at the most recent follow-up, nor was there a significant difference in C7 alignment (p = 0.057) or apical thoracic alignment (p = 0.272) between the 1A and 1C groups. Thoracolumbar/lumbar curves were smaller in the 1A group at all-time points. However, there was no significant difference between the percent correction between the two groups thoracic (p = 0.453) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (p = 0.105). The Lenke 1C curves had improved coronal translational alignment of the LIV at the most recent follow-up p = 0.0355. At the most recent follow-up the number of patients considered to have successful curve correction (Cobb angle correction of both the thoracic and thoracolumbar//lumbar curves to ≤ 35 degrees), was equivalent between Lenke 1A and Lenke 1C curves (p = 0.80). There was also no difference in the rate of revision surgery between the two groups (p = 0.546).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to compare the impact of lumbar curve modifier type on outcomes in thoracic AVBT. We found that Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate less absolute correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all time points but have equivalent percent correction of the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. The two groups have equivalent alignment at C7 and the thoracic curve apex, and Lenke 1C curves have better alignment at the LIV at the most recent follow-up. Furthermore, they have an equivalent rate of revision surgery compared to Lenke 1A curves. Selective thoracic AVBT is a viable option for selective Lenke 1C curves, but despite equivalent correction of the thoracic curve, there is less correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all-time points.

Inter-screw index as a novel diagnostic indicator of tether breakage

PURPOSE

Tether breakage is the most common complication of Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) occurring in up to 52% of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients and risks continued progression and revision. Radiographical diagnosis of tether breakage is commonly defined by a 5° increase in inter-screw angle and associates breakage with loss of correction. However, the sensitivity of this method was 56% only, suggesting that tethers can break without an increase in angulation, which was supported by other studies. To our knowledge, current literature lacks a method merely focusing on the diagnosis of tether breakage radiographically that does not associate the breakages with loss of correction.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of AIS patients who underwent VBT. The "inter-screw index" is defined as the percentage increase in inter-screw distance since post-op, with ≥ 13% increase defined as tether breakage as suggested by our mechanical tests. CTs were reviewed to identify the breakages and compared with inter-screw angle and inter-screw index.

RESULTS

94 segments from 13 CTs were reviewed, and 15 tether breakages were identified. Use of inter-screw index correctly identified 14 breakages (93%), whereas ≥ 5° increase in inter-screw angle only identified 12 breakages (80%).

CONCLUSION

Use of inter-screw index is proven to be more sensitive than inter-screw angle in identifying tether breakages. Therefore, we propose the use of inter-screw index to diagnose tether breakages radiographically. Tether breakages were not necessarily accompanied by a loss of segmental correction leading to an increase in inter-screw angle, especially after skeletal maturity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the motion-preserving properties of vertebral body tethering with varying cord/screw constructs and cord thicknesses in cadaveric thoracolumbar spines.

METHODS

In vitro flexibility tests were performed on six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (T1-L5) (2 M, 4F) with a median age of 63 (59-to-80). An ± 8 Nm load was applied to determine range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Specimens were tested with screws (T5-L4) and without cords. Single (4.0 mm and 5.0 mm) and double (4.0 mm) cord constructs were sequentially tensioned to 100 N and tested: (1) Single 4.0 mm and (2) 5.0 mm cords (T5-T12); (3) Double 4.0 mm cords (T5-12); (4) Single 4.0 mm and (5) 5.0 mm cord (T12-L4); (6) Double 4.0 mm cords (T12-L4).

RESULTS

In the thoracic spine (T5-T12), 4.0-5.0 mm single-cord constructs showed slight reductions in FE and 27-33% reductions in LB compared to intact, while double-cord constructs showed reductions of 24% and 40%, respectively. In the lumbar spine (T12-L4), double-cord constructs had greater reductions in FE (24%), LB (74%), and AR (25%) compared to intact, while single-cord constructs exhibited reductions of 2-4%, 68-69%, and 19-20%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present biomechanical study found similar motion for 4.0-5.0 mm single-cord constructs and the least motion for double-cord constructs in the thoracic and lumbar spine suggesting that larger diameter 5.0 mm cords may be a more promising motion-preserving option, due to their increased durability compared to smaller cords. Future clinical studies are necessary to determine the impact of these findings on patient outcomes.

The use of electronic conductivity devices can effectively reduce radiation exposure in vertebral body tethering

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) presents new challenges in respect to radiation exposure, as screws cannot be placed free-hand and the lateral positioning of the patients increases scattered radiation. To reduce radiation exposure, we introduced the use of electronic conductivity device (ECD). These are drilling probes send an audio signal when cortical bone is breached. Thus, anterior, bicortical screws can be placed without multiple fluoroscopic controls. ECD has been used for all VBT procedures at our institution starting April 2020. The aim of this study was to test the safety of ECD and its efficacy in radiation reduction in comparison with the current standard, the fluoroscopic guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent VBT between August 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups according to whether ECD had been used or not. The radiation exposure per procedure and per screw was compared among the two groups, overall and separately for thoracic, lumbar and bilateral procedures. The rate of misplaced screws was calculated.

RESULTS

Data from 62 patients and 825 screws were obtained (397 with ECD). No screw misplacement was observed. Radiation reduction with ECD reached up to 41%. A significant reduction was observed in the radiation per procedure in bilateral instrumentation (from 9.16 to 5.52 mGy*m²), and in the analysis per screw overall (from 9.16 to 5.52 mGy*m²) and for lumbar curves (from 0.54 to 0.32 mGy*m²).

CONCLUSION

ECD can safely and effectively reduce the radiation exposure for VBT procedures.

Operative differences for posterior spinal fusion after vertebral body tethering: Are we fusing more levels in the end?

PURPOSE

Little is known about the perioperative characteristics associated with a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients previously treated with vertebral body tethering (VBT). We aimed to determine if operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative length of stay, instrumentation type, and implant density differed in patients that received a PSF (i.e., PSF-Only) or a PSF following a failed VBT (i.e., PSF-VBT).

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed matched cohort data (PSF-VBT = 22; PSF-Only = 22) from two multi-center registries. We obtained: (1) operative time, (2) estimated blood loss, (3) postoperative length of stay, (4) instrumentation type, and (5) implant density. Theoretical fusion levels prior to the index procedure were obtained for PSF-VBT and compared to the actual levels fused.

RESULTS

We observed no difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, or postoperative length of stay. Instrumentation type was all-screw in PSF-Only and varied in PSF-VBT with nearly 25% of patients exhibiting a hybrid construct. There was no added benefit to removing anterior instrumentation prior to fusion; however, implant density was higher in PSF-Only (1.9 ± 0.2) than when compared to PSF-VBT (1.7 ± 0.3). An additional two levels were fused in 50% of PSF-VBT patients, most of which were added to the distal end of the construct.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative length of stay were similar in both cohorts; however, the length of the fusion construct in PSF-VBT is likely to be two levels longer when a failed VBT is converted to a PSF.

Changes in research quality and surgical trends at the international congress on early-onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

The founding of the International Congress for Early Onset Scoliosis (ICEOS) and first annual meeting in 2007 represented a significant milestone in advancing the care of patients with EOS. Due to the complexity and rarity of EOS, this annual conference is the premiere venue for physicians, researchers, and advanced practice providers to identify and understand the best treatments for children with EOS. This study examines the trend of various treatment modalities presented at ICEOS and the changes in research quality since its inception.

METHODS

Podium presentations from the 2007 through 2021 ICEOS annual meetings were reviewed to determine the number of study patients, use of a study group, and key features of study design. Treatment strategies being evaluated were recorded and included non-operative treatments (casting/bracing), traditional growing rods (TGR), vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR), Shilla growth guidance, magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and vertebral body tethering (VBT). Linear regressions were performed to analyze changes in research topic and study group utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 532 abstracts were reviewed. An average of 97.5 ± 81.3 patients were included per study with a significant increase from 42.3 ± 89.7 in 2007 to 337.6 ± 587.4 in 2021 (r² = 0.632, p < 0.001). A total of 130 (24.4%) abstracts resulted from multicenter study groups with the proportion increasing significantly from 13.0% in 2007 to 36.4% in 2021 (p = 0.039, r² = 0.289). The majority (96.2%) of study group-based projects were from either the Growing Spine Study Group (GSSG), Chest Wall and Spine Deformity Study Group (CWSDG), Children's Spine Study Group (CSSG), or the Pediatric Spine Study Group (PSSG). Additionally, a significant increase in studies utilizing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was observed (r² = 0.336, p = 0.023). Significant increases in the proportion of presentations discussing MCGR (r² = 0.738, p < 0.001) and VBT (r² = 0.294, p = 0.037) as surgical treatments were observed.

CONCLUSION

The trends in EOS device implantation observed in registry studies align with the trends in research presented at ICEOS including the increased proportion of studies focusing on MCGR and VBT over the past decade. An attempt to increase the quality of research presented at ICEOS through multicenter study groups, increased patient recruitment, and utilization of PROMs has been seen since its inception.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Case report: vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis in a patient with bilateral phocomelia

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to present a case report of a patient with bilateral upper extremity phocomelia with progressive scoliosis, who underwent vertebral body tethering (VBT).

METHODS

This is a case report on the use of VBT in a patient with scoliosis and bilateral congenital phocomelia, with 5 year follow-up.

RESULTS

A male patient with bilateral phocomelia had early onset scoliosis that progressed to 45° at age 10. Surgical options were discussed, including traditional VBT, posterior spinal fusion, growing rods, magnetically controlled growing rods, and vertical expandible prosthetic titanium ribs. These options would limit the flexibility of the spine. Given these pitfalls, VBT was chosen, as it would address the scoliosis while maintaining trunk flexibility. Preoperatively, he had 45° right main thoracic curve, bending to 22°; he was Risser 0 with open triradiate cartilage. He underwent T6-T11 thoracoscopic VBT, with postoperative correction to 37°. Postoperatively, the patient was able to continue to use his lower extremities for writing, feeding, and personal grooming. He had no postoperative complications. At 3 years, his curve was 21°, and at 5 years was 19°.

CONCLUSION

This case describes a novel technique for treating scoliosis in patients with bilateral phocomelia. Other forms of scoliosis surgical treatment limit motion of the spine. Due to this, we present VBT as an option for this unique set of patients for correcting scoliosis, while also preserving trunk flexibility for its role in feeding and self-care.

Reliability of radiographic assessment of growth modulation from anterior vertebral body tethering surgery in pediatric scoliosis

PURPOSE

To assess the reliability of vertebral height and angular measurements for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT).

METHODS

Eight observers measured PA radiographs of 15 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with AVBT, pre-operative and 4-year follow-up. Vertebral wedging, disc wedging, convex vertebral body heights, and concave vertebral body heights of the 3 apical vertebrae were measured. For each observer, there were a total of 90 measurements for vertebral body height and 75 measurements for all wedging types At least 14 days elapsed between first and second round measurements.

RESULTS

From the pre-operative to the 4-year follow-up time-point, the total wedging angle over the 3 peri-apical levels fell from 30 ± 7° to 16 ± 6° (p < 0.001) and the difference between the convex and concave vertebral heights decreased from 9 ± 4 to 6 ± 3 mm (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement for pre-operative vertebral body heights was good [ICC = 0.80; 95% CI (0.74-0.85)]. At 4-year follow-up there was a moderate agreement [ICC = 0.67 (0.59-0.74)]. There was a poor interobserver agreement for pre-operative wedging angle measurements [ICC = 0.41 (0.32-0.52)] and 4-year follow-up [ICC = 0.45 (0.36-0.56)]. The Limits of Agreement with the Mean (LOAM) for pre-op heights was ± 2.4 mm, similar to the follow-up ± 2.6 mm. When raters are averaged in random groups of two the agreement limits decrease to ± 1.8 mm pre-op and ± 1.6 mm at follow-up. Similarly for wedging angles, LOAM values among the 8 observers of ± 4.6° pre-op and ± 4.2° dropped to ± 2.7° for both pre-op and follow-up when random groups of two raters were averaged together. Intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent per individual (ICC = 0.84-0.94) for pre-operative vertebral body heights, but this decreased at 4-year follow-up (ICC = 0.52-0.88). Intraobserver agreement was low overall for wedging (pre-operative ICC = 0.41-0.71; 4-year follow-up ICC = 0.41-0.76).

CONCLUSION

Based on 8 individual observers, interobserver agreement ranged from good (pre-operative vertebral body heights) to moderate (4-year follow-up vertebral body heights) to poor (all wedging angles). To improve the reliability of the measurement of wedging angles, we recommend averaging the measurements of at least two observers.

The effect of vertebral body tethering on spine range of motion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation (PSF) and vertebral body tethering (VBT) are corrective surgical techniques used in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Comparing the preservation of spine range of motion (ROM) following PSF and VBT for treatment of AIS has yet to be explored. The purpose of this work was to retrospectively compare global spine ROM in adolescents (9-18 years of age) without spine deformity, adolescents with untreated AIS, adolescents having undergone PSF, and adolescents having undergone VBT to gain insight on the effect of VBT on spine motion.

METHODS

Twenty participants were recruited into four groups including Control (n = 6), untreated AIS (n = 5), post-operative PSF (n = 4) and post-operative VBT (n = 5). Three-dimensional kinematics of the spine were collected and analyzed using an intersegmental spine model during constrained forward flexion, right-left lateral bending, and right-left axial twist movements.

RESULTS

The PSF group displayed significantly lower spine ROM than the two non-operative groups during thoracic and total left axial twist (p ≤ 0.048), whereas thoracic and total ROM during right-left lateral bending is almost equally lower in the PSF (p ≤ 0.03) and VBT (p ≤ 0.01) groups when compared to the Control and AIS groups.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest some preservation of spine motion in the transverse plane following VBT. This study provides initial evidence of some potential preservation of spine ROM following VBT; however, further prospective investigation of VBT is needed to assess and confirm these hypotheses.

Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Over the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%-69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%-79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%-78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%-13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%-49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months' follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%-10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times.

The preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

VBT is a novel alternative to spinal fusion surgery to treat skeletally immature AIS and was approved to correct idiopathic scoliosis in August 2019 by US Federal Drug Administration (FDA). To systemically review the preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT) in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were queried up to January 2022 for articles regarding VBT. Basic characteristics of patients, changes of radiographic parameters in coronal and sagittal planes, and clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of VBT including complication and revision rates were summarized.

RESULTS

Twenty five studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (23/25) included patients with only skeletal immaturity. The average % correction of the main/tethered curve at final follow-up, and % correction of thoracic kyphosis at final follow-up were reported to be 15.6-106.5% and - 31.8 to 20.0%, respectively. The most common complications for VBT were tether breakage (n = 145;21.3%), pulmonary complications (n = 49; 6.9%), and overcorrection (n = 30; 4.2%). The revision rate was 13.1%.

CONCLUSION

VBT could effectively and safely correct spinal deformity in skeletally immature patients with AIS and preserve the motion and growth of the spine. However, VBT has a relatively high complication and revision rates. Therefore, surgeons should cautiously consider VBT for treating AIS. Future research efforts are needed to lower the complication and revision rates. Whatever, VBT is still in its infancy and may have a promising future as a non-fusion solution for AIS.

The timing of tether breakage influences clinical results after VBT

INTRODUCTION

Tether breakage is a frequent mechanical complications after vertebral body tethering (VBT), but not all patients with a breakage show loss of correction. The reason of this clinical finding has not yet been clarified. We hypothesized that the integrity of the tether is relevant only in the early stages after VBT, when it drives growth modulation and tissue remodelling. After these mechanisms have taken place, the tether loses its function and a breakage will not alter the new shape of the spine. Thus, tether breakage would have a greater clinical relevance when occurring shortly after surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent VBT and had a min. 2-year follow-up were included. The difference in curve magnitude between the 1st standing x-ray and the last follow-up was calculated (ΔCobb). For each curve, the presence and timing of tether breakage were recorded. The curves were grouped according to if and when the breakage was observed (no breakage, breakage at 0-6 months, 6-12 months, > 12 months). The ΔCobb was compared among these groups with the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Data from 152 curves were available: 68 with no breakage, 12 with a breakage at 0-6 months, 37 at 6-12 months and 35 > 12 months. The ANOVA found significant difference in the ΔCobb among the groups (Sum of square 2553.59; degree of freedom 3; mean of square 851.1; Fisher test 13.8; P < 0.0001). Patients with no breakage or breakage at > 12 months had similar ΔCobb (mean 4.8° and 7.8°, respectively, P = 0.3), smaller than the 0-6 or 6-12 groups (15.8° and 13.8°, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Tether breakage leads to a consistent loss of correction when occurring within the first 12 months, while it has limited clinical relevance when occurring later on.

Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: how well does the tether hold up?

PURPOSE

Durability of outcomes following vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a concern and may be impacted by tether breakage (TB), which has been unstudied in a large cohort. We characterized TB rates and their impact on clinical outcomes in the largest single-surgeon series to date.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were VBT patients with AIS, major Cobb angle ≤ 75°, and minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). TBs were identified on 1- and 2-year FU X-rays. TB rates between single-cord and double-cord tethers were evaluated using two-proportion z test. Curve correction rates and SRS-22 scores between patients with and without TB at 2 years were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

69 patients were included. By 2-year FU, 18 (27%) had experienced TB. TB primarily occurred in major (70%) versus minor curves and thoracolumbar tethers (75%) versus thoracic. TB rates between thoracolumbar single (32%) and double-cord tethers (30%) were not significantly different (p = 0.88). Mean major curve correction at 2-year FU was lower (p = 0.02) in patients with major curve TB (48° to 24°, 50%) versus those without (53°-21°, 60%). 2 patients (3%) required reoperation, 1 due to foraminal encroachment from a screw tip and 1 for curve progression with TB.

CONCLUSION

TB rate was 27% at 2 years following VBT. Broken major curve tethers are associated with minor loss of correction that may not be clinically significant. TB rates are higher for thoracolumbar curvatures and double cords may not be protective against TB. Further study of long-term TB rates is imperative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Post-operative tranexamic acid decreases chest tube drainage following vertebral body tethering surgery for scoliosis correction

PURPOSE

Anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis requiring chest tube(s) (CT). We sought to assess the efficacy of post-op intravenous tranexamic acid (IV TXA) in reducing CT drainage and retention.

METHODS

35 VBT patients received 24 h of post-op IV TXA (2 mg/kg/h) were compared to 49 who did not. Group comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-squared tests. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationships between TXA and both CT drainage and retention time.

RESULTS

There were no group differences at baseline (Table). CTs placed for thoracic (T) and thoracolumbar (TL) curves were assessed separately. For TH CT, there was less total CT drainage in the TXA group (TXA 569.4 ± 337.4 mL vs. Non-TXA 782.5 ± 338.9 mL; p = 0.003) and shorter CT retention time (TXA 3.0 ± 1.3 vs. Non-TXA 3.9 ± 1.4 days; p = 0.003). For TL CT, there was less total CT drainage in the TXA group (TXA 206.8 ± 152.2 mL vs. Non-TXA 395.7 ± 196.1 mL; p = 0.003) and shorter CT retention time (TXA 1.7 ± 1.3 vs. Non-TXA 2.7 ± 1.0 days; p = 0.001). Following multivariate analysis, use of TXA was the only significant predictor of both drainage in T and TL CTs (p = 0.012 and p = 0.002, respectively) as well as T and TL CT retention time (p = 0.008 and p = 0.009, respectively). There were no differences in LOS (p = 0.863) or ICU stay (p = 0.290).

CONCLUSION

IV TXA results in a significant decrease in CT drainage and retention time. CT retention is decreased by 1 day for those that receive TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

To tether or fuse? Significant equipoise remains in treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) continues to grow in interest from both a patient and surgeon perspective for the treatment of scoliosis. However, the data are limited when it comes to surgeon selection of both procedure type and instrumented levels. This study sought to assess surgeon variability in treatment recommendation and level selection for VBT versus posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the management of scoliosis.

METHODS

Surgeon members of the Pediatric Spine Study Group and Harms Study Group were queried for treatment recommendations and proposed upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection for PSF and VBT based on 17 detailed clinical vignettes. Responses were subdivided in each clinical vignette according to surgeon experience and treatment recommendations with assessment of intra-rater reliability. Binomial distribution tests were used to establish equipoise, selecting p < 0.10 to indicate the presence of a treatment choice with consensus set > 70% agreement. For treatment choice, responses were assessed first for consensus on the decision to proceed with PSF or VBT.

RESULTS

Thirty-five surgeons with varied experience completed the survey with 26 surgeons (74%) completing the second follow-up survey. Overall, VBT was the recommended treatment by 47% of surgeons, ranging by clinical vignette. Consensus in treatment recommendation was present for 6 clinical vignettes including 3 for VBT and 3 for PSF, with equipoise present for the remaining 11. Of the 17 vignettes, 12 demonstrated moderate intra-observer reliability including the 3 consensus vignettes for VBT. Sanders stage ≤ 3 and smaller curve magnitude were related with VBT recommendation but neither age nor curve flexibility significantly influenced the decision to recommend VBT. Surgeons with high VBT volume, ≥ 11 VBT cases/year, were more likely to recommend VBT than those with low volumes (0-10 cases per year (p < 0.0001)). High VBT volume surgeons demonstrated consensus in VBT recommendation for Lenke 5/6 curves (75% mean recommendation). High VBT volume surgeons had a significantly higher VBT recommendation rate for Lenke 1A, 2A curves (71.8% vs 48.0%, p = 0.012), and Lenke 3 curves (62% vs 26.9%, p = 0.023). Equipoise was present for all vignettes in low volume surgeons. In addition, high VBT volume surgeons trended toward including more instrumented levels than low VBT volume surgeons (7.17 vs 6.69 levels).

CONCLUSION

Significant equipoise is present among pediatric spine surgeons for treatment recommendations regarding VBT and PSF. Surgeon-, patient-, and curve-specific variables were identified to influence treatment recommendations, including surgeon experience, curve subtype, deformity magnitude, and skeletal maturity. This study highlights the need for continued research in identifying the optimal indications for VBT and PSF in the treatment of pediatric spinal deformity.

Analysis of the risk factors for early tether breakage following vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

Tether breakage is a common mechanical complication after VBT. When this occurs shortly after surgery, patients may be at higher risk for loss of correction. Aim of this study was to analyze demographic and radiographic parameters that may potentially be risk factors for early tether breakage, as no data are yet available on this topic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All skeletally immature patients who underwent VBT and for whom a 1-year follow-up was available were included in the study. Demographic, intraoperative and coronal and sagittal parameters from the preoperative and 1st standing X-rays were collected. Patients were divided in two groups according to the presence or absence of a breakage and the outcomes of interest were compared.

RESULTS

Data from 105 patients were available (age 14.2 ± 1.5, 153 curves). Lumbar curves showed a higher risk of breakage than thoracic ones (71% vs. 29%, P < 0.0001). Overall, preoperative risk factors were a high curve magnitude (MD, mean difference - 4.1°, P = 0.03) and a limited flexibility (MD 8.9%, P = 0.006); postoperative risk factors were a large residual curve (MD - 6.4°, P = 0.0005) and a limited correction (MD 8.4%, P = 0.0005). The same risk factors were identified in thoracic curves, while in lumbar instrumentation only a higher preoperative Cobb angle represented a risk factor for breakage. Age and skeletal maturity did not represent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The main preoperative risk factors for early tether breakage after VBT are a high curve magnitude and a limited flexibility. A limited curve correction also represents a risk factor for this complication.

Anterior vertebral tethering: imaging of tether rupture

Anterior vertebral tethering, also known as vertebral body tethering, is an evolving, minimally invasive surgical technique to correct spinal curvature in skeletally immature patients. The procedure involves placement of vertebral screws that are connected by an anterolateral tether. This procedure may be complicated by rupture of the non-radiopaque tether. The radiologist should be aware of imaging findings that suggest this complication on follow-up spine radiographs.

Body mass index affects outcomes after vertebral body tethering surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (AVBT) surgery between overweight and non-overweight patients.

METHODS

AIS/JIS patients with AVBT with 2-year follow-up from a multi-center pediatric spine database were evaluated pre-operatively, 1st post-operative erect, and 2 years post-operatively. ANOVA was used to compare 3 categories of BMI with significance as per Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc test. Risk of scoliosis progression was analysed with Mid-P exact test.

RESULTS

121 patients (51 underweight, 58 normal, 12 overweight; mean age 12.5 ± 1.6 yr; BMI 18.8 ± 4.6 kg/m²) were identified. Comparing underweight, normal, and overweight groups: mean pre-operative age (13 yr, 13 yr, 12 yr), scoliosis (52°, 50°, 52°), pre-operative kyphosis (29°, 28°, 33°), peri-operative scoliosis correction (44%, 42%, 46%), and complications by 2-year follow-up (23%, 24%, 17%) were similar between groups. There was one broken tether in each of the underweight and normal weight groups. Change in percent scoliosis correction from 1st erect to 2-year post-operative (i.e., growth modulation phase) was not significantly different between groups; however, the risk ratio for scoliosis progression during this period was 4.74 (1.02-22.02; p = 0.04) for overweight patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that, as compared to normal weight and underweight patients, overweight patients did not have a statistically significant difference in intra-operative scoliosis correction or in risk of experiencing complication; however, overweight patients had a risk ratio of 4.74 for progression of scoliosis during the growth modulation phase of treatment from first erect radiographs to minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anterior vertebral body tethering for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis leads to asymmetric growth of the periapical vertebrae

PURPOSE

To evaluate 3D growth of the periapical vertebrae and discs in the 2 years after anterior vertebral body tether (AVBT) placement in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

METHODS

Patients with IS treated with AVBT, ≥ 2 years of follow-up, and 3D spine reconstructions created from simultaneous, biplanar radiographs were studied. Patients were divided into two groups: progressive scoliosis correction (PC) or no/limited correction (NPC). The average of the 3 apical vertebral and disc heights and angular measures were made. The rate of change for each measure (mm/mo, °/mo) from first erect to 2-year follow-up was compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fourteen (Risser 0, Sanders 2-3) patients aged 11.4 ± 1.4 years with right thoracic scoliosis of 52 ± 9° were included. There were 7 patients per group (6F, 1M). Mean follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.1 (range 2-5) years. PC left-sided vertebral height increased 0.13 mm/months compared to 0.05 mm/mo in the NPC group (p = 0.001). Right (tethered side) vertebral growth was not different (PC: 0.07 mm/mo, NPC: 0.05 mm/mo, p = 0.2). Coronal vertebral wedging occurred at - 0.11°/mo compared to - 0.02°/mo for the PC and NPC groups, respectively (p = 0.004). Coronal disc angulation change was - 0.12°/mo in the PC group and - 0.04°/mo in the NPC group (p = 0.03), and was associated with loss of right disc height (PC: - 0.06 mm/mo) with little effect on the left disc height (PC: -0.01 mm/mo).

CONCLUSIONS

AVBT in immature patients with thoracic scoliosis can asymmetrically modulate growth of the periapical vertebrae and discs. Progressive reduction in scoliosis after AVBT was associated with greater concave growth rates in the vertebrae and loss of disc height on the convex side.

Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has shown promising results but also a high tether breakage rate, which has been reported in up to 48% of patients. Tether breakages can lead to loss of correction, and the most used definition for tether breakage is a loss of segmental correction of > 5°. However, there may also be some breakages that do not have a negative influence on curve correction. Analyzing the real breakage rate was the aim of this study.

METHODS

All patients who underwent anterior revision surgery after VBT were included in this retrospective study. Real (intraoperatively confirmed) tether breakages were compared to preoperatively suspected tether breakages. The definition for a suspected tether breakage was an angular change of more than 5° between an early and the latest radiograph.

RESULTS

Ten patients who received 11 revision surgeries with a total of 15 revised curves were analyzed. Of the 80 analyzed segments, 36 were found to have a breakage. Of these 36 segments, 20 were suspected to be broken preoperatively. Sixteen breakages were not identified on preoperative radiographs (44%). One suspected broken tether was intraoperatively found to be intact.

CONCLUSION

By using the > 5° rule, only 56% of the tether breakages could be diagnosed. On the other hand, many tether breakages will not result in a loss of correction.

The effects of vertebral body tethering on sagittal parameters: evaluations from a 2-years follow-up

INTRODUCTION

While the effects of VBT on coronal parameters have been investigated in various studies, this has not yet been the case for sagittal parameters. This is of particular relevance considering that VBT does not allow direct correction of the sagittal profile. Thus, we investigated the effects of VBT on sagittal parameters in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective, 2-Center study. Patients who underwent VBT and presented a 2-years follow-up were included. The differences in sagittal parameters were evaluated, along with modifications of sagittal profile following Abelin-Genevois' classification.

RESULTS

Data from 86 patients were obtained. Mean Cobb angle was 52.4 ± 13.9° at thoracic level and 47.6 ± 14.3° at lumbar level before surgery, and 28.5 ± 13.6 and 26.6 ± 12.7° at the 2-year follow-up, respectively. Mean thoracic kyphosis increased from 28.3 ± 13.8 to 33 ± 13°, the lumbar lordosis (LL) was unvaried (from 47.5 ± 13.1 to 48.4 ± 13.5°), PT decreased from 9.4 ± 8.5 to 7.4 ± 6.1°, the sagittal vertical axis SVA decreased from 4.5 ± 31.4 to - 3.6 ± 27.9 mm. No kyphotic effect on LL in patients who underwent lumbar instrumentation was observed. Before surgery, 39 patients had a type 1 sagittal profile, 18 were type 2a, 14 type 2b and 15 type 3. Postoperatively, 54 were type 1, 8 were 2a, 13 were 2b and 11 were type 3.

CONCLUSIONS

VBT positively influences sagittal parameters and does not have a kyphotic effect on LL.

Defining the learning curve in CT-guided navigated thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering

Estimated blood loss (EBL), anesthesia time, operative time, and length of stay decreased over 67 navigated vertebral body tethering (VBT) surgeries performed in a 5-year period, indicating a steep learning curve.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

HYPOTHESIS

There would be a significant improvement in the performance of VBT procedures over time at a single tertiary center in terms of perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

PURPOSE

Learning a new procedure for surgeons takes time, and previous studies have described improved efficiency as experience grows. VBT procedures are increasingly being performed in the US, but there is limited data regarding the learning curve specifically regarding the use of CT-guided navigation. We sought to assess the learning curve of VBT with respect to estimated blood loss, anesthesia time, operative time, length of stay, percent correction of the major curve at first follow-up. We further sought to characterize change in rates of 90-day complications.

METHODS

Pediatric scoliosis patients who underwent thoracic or lumbar CT-guided navigated VBT with a consistent surgical team at a single tertiary referral center between 2015 and 2020 were included. Student t-test was used to assess change in perioperative parameters over time, and also results between first and latest group of 20 patients were compared.

RESULTS

67 patients met inclusion criteria. Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, anesthesia time and length of stay significantly decreased over the 5-year study period. Specifically, on comparison of our first 20 patients with our last 20, the former had greater EBL (282 vs 116 ml, p = 0.0005; 8.5% vs 3.6%, p = 0.0024), operative time (4.8 h vs. 3.3 h, p < 0.001), anesthesia time (7.4 h vs. 5.7 h, p = 0.0001), and length of stay (3.7 days vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.019). We also found significant reduction in EBL, operative time, anesthesia time and LOS in patients who underwent VBT surgery after 2019. There was no significant change in the percent correction of the major Cobb angle at first erect imaging or 90-day complications over the 5-year study period or between the various cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This series has demonstrated improvements in surgical efficiency for VBT including reduced EBL, operative time, anesthesia time and hospital stay over a 5-year period. This indicates improved surgical technique and outlines the significant learning curve for surgeons who wish to perform this procedure. Improved surgeon training programs and newer instrumentation may reduce this learning curve.

TAKE HOME POINT

67 cases in a 5-year period, VBT procedures performed at a single center had significantly decreased EBL, anesthesia time, operative time, and length of stay, indicating a steep learning curve.

Thoracic paravertebral nerve catheter reduces postoperative opioid use for vertebral body tethering patients

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering is increasingly being performed, yet postoperative pain management has not yet been optimized. We sought to determine whether the addition of a thoracic paravertebral block in addition to a standard multimodal postoperative pain management program could provide greater pain relief, reduced analgesic requirement, and reduced length of stay.

METHODS

Patients who underwent VBT at a single tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received a single-shot intrathecal (IT) injection at the completion of the procedure in addition to a standardized multimodal pain management program. 45 patients received a thoracic paravertebral catheter with lidocaine infusion (TPVB) which was left in place for 4-6 days, whereas 24 control patients did not have a TPVB. Length of stay, maximum postoperative Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS), and total dose of opioids, ibuprofen, ketorolac and acetaminophen administered during hospitalization were evaluated.

RESULTS

69 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean cumulative dose of opioids administered during hospitalization was 148 oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) in the control group vs. 47 MME in the TPVB group (p < 0.0001). Severe postoperative NPIS of ≥ 7 was reported in 9 out of the 24 control patients (38%) and in 13 out of the 45 patients (29%) who received a TPVB in addition to the standardized care (p = 0.46). There was no significant difference in the mean cumulative dose of NSAIDs (ibuprofen, ketorolac) consumed by the control group compared to the TPVB group (2632 mg vs. 1630 mg, p = 0.77). Mean length of stay in the control group was 3.8 vs. 3.0 days in the TPVB group (p < 0.001). There were no major complications associated with use of the TPVB.

CONCLUSION

In this series compared to controls, patients treated with a TPVB had reduced postoperative requirement of opioids and decreased length of hospital stay.

Does vertebral body tethering cause disc and facet joint degeneration? A preliminary MRI study with minimum two years follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Vertebral body tethering (VBT), a flexible compression-based growth modulation technique, was claimed to prevent disc degeneration due to its less rigid nature compared to other growth-friendly techniques. Yet, the consequences of VBT surgery on discs and facet joints have not been precisely acknowledged.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in the intermediate and adjacent levels at least 2 years after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Prospectively-followed consecutive patient cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent thoracoscopic VBT between 2014 and 2017 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Degeneration of the intervertebral discs using the Pfirrmann classification; Degeneration of facet joints using a scale of 0 to 3.

METHODS

Demographic, perioperative, clinical, radiographic data were collected. Skeletal maturity and height gain were assessed in every follow-up. Overcorrection, tether breakage, mechanical and pulmonary complications as well as readmission and reoperations were recorded. MRIs taken before surgery and at a minimum of 2 years follow-up were evaluated for degeneration at the intermediate and adjacent segment intervertebral discs and facet joints by a blinded senior radiologist and compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with a mean of 38.6±10.6 months (24-62) of follow-up were included. The mean age at surgery was 12.2 (10-14), and the median Sanders stage was 3 (1-7). A mean of 7.7±1.1 (6-11) levels were tethered. The mean preoperative main thoracic curve magnitude of 46°±7.7° was corrected to 23.3°±5.9° postoperatively, which was subsequently modulated to 12° ±11.5° during the follow-up. At the time of the MRI (mean 29±9.5 (24-62) months), the median Sanders stages was 7 (5-8). A total of 217 levels of discs and bilateral facet joints were evaluated in the preoperative and follow-up MRI images. Analyses of disc and facet scores revealed no significant differences between patients. Deterioration of previously degenerated discs was noted in one patient (from grade 2 to 3), while previously healthy lower adjacent facet joints were degenerated (grade 2) in another patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermediate discs and facet joints were preserved after growth modulation with VBT surgery at a mean of 29 months of follow-up. Studies in larger cohorts with longer follow-up are warranted to have more in-depth analyses of the effects of relative stabilization and altered biomechanical loads.

Motion preservation surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of studies on new vertebral body tethering (VBT) surgical constructs especially regarding their potentially motion-preserving ability. This study analyses their effects on the ROM of the spine.

METHODS

Human spines (T10-L3) were tested under pure moment in four different conditions: (1) native, (2) instrumented with one tether continuously connected in all vertebrae from T10 to L3, (3) additional instrumented with a second tether continuously connected in all vertebrae from T11 to L3, and (4) instrumented with one tether and one titanium rod (hybrid) attached to T12, L1 and L2. The instrumentation was inserted in the left lateral side. The intersegmental ROM was evaluated using a magnetic tracking system, and the medians were analysed. Please check and confirm the author names and initials are correct. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct. The mentioned information is correct RESULTS: Compared to the native spine, the instrumented spine presented a reduction of less than 13% in global ROM considering flexion-extension and axial rotation. For left lateral bending, the median global ROM of the native spine (100%) significantly reduced to 74.6%, 66.4%, and 68.1% after testing one tether, two tethers and the hybrid construction, respectively. In these cases, the L1-L2 ROM was reduced to 68.3%, 58.5%, and 38.3%, respectively. In right lateral bending, the normalized global ROM of the spine with one tether, two tethers and the hybrid construction was 58.9%, 54.0%, and 56.6%, respectively. Considering the same order, the normalized L1-L2 ROM was 64.3%, 49.9%, and 35.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The investigated VBT techniques preserved global ROM of the spine in flexion-extension and axial rotation while reduced the ROM in lateral bending.

Analysis of the pulmonary function in patients undergoing vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

The literature concerning the effects of scoliosis correction on pulmonary function (PF) is scarce and solely related to spinal fusion. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) represents a new option for scoliosis correction; however, its effects on PF have not yet been investigated. As VBT is a fusion-less technique that does not limit the dynamics of the chest wall, it is expected not to have a negative impact on PF despite the anterior surgical approach.

METHODS

We analyzed the PF preoperatively and compared it with the PF at 6-weeks, 6-months and 12-monthts postoperatively. Considered parameters were total lung capacity (TLC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) expressed as percentages. A change of more than 10% was considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Before VBT, overall TLC, FEV1 and FVC measured 98 ± 15%, 85 ± 16% and 91 ± 17%, respectively. Six weeks after surgery, all parameters were comparable to the preoperative values (TLC 96 ± 17%, FEV1 84 ± 14%, FVC 90 ± 16%) and remained so at the last follow-up (TLC 99 ± 15%, FEV1 89 ± 9%, FVC 86 ± 9). While a reduction in FEV1 and FVC was observed at 6-weeks and 6-months in patients with thoracic or double curves compared to thoracolumbar curves, no significant differences were observed at the 12-months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

VBT does not cause a reduction in PF values at a short-term follow-up.

Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct

INTRODUCTION

Aim of this study was to analyze the rate of tether breakages after lumbar vertebral body tethering (VBT) and to study the effects and possible benefits of the use of a 2-tether construct. Tether breakage is a known mechanical complication after VBT. However, the literature only refers to thoracic VBT, and no data on the breakage rate or 2-tether construct after lumbar VBT are available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent lumbar VBT with lowest instrumented vertebra at L3 or L4 and had a 1-year follow-up were included. Radiologic data were obtained preoperatively, at the 1st standing X-ray and at the 1-year follow-up to study breakage rate, loss of correction and lumbar lordosis in 1- and 2-tether constructs.

RESULTS

Data from 30 patients (mean age 14.7 ± 1.8) were available, 12 with double tether. Double tether did not decrease lumbar lordosis. The breakage rate was 24% in segments instrumented with a single tether and 16% in segments instrumented with a double tether (OR 1.6, p = 0.4). Lumbar loss of correction was 10° ± 6.8° in the entire cohort and 12.1° ± 5.4° in patients with a breakage (p = 0.2). Revision rate was 10%, due to tether breakage and loss of correction.

CONCLUSION

Breakage rate after lumbar VBT is high, but was improved with the use of a 2-tether construct. Despite tether breakage, loss of correction was limited and the revision rate low. The use of a double tether does not have a kyphotic effect on the lumbar spine.

Does preoperative and intraoperative imaging for anterior vertebral body tethering predict postoperative correction?

PURPOSE

Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is an emerging approach for idiopathic scoliosis. However, overcorrection and under-correction are common causes of revision surgery, and intraoperative tensioning of the cord is one key component to achieve appropriate curve correction. We sought to determine whether preoperative flexibility radiographs or intraoperative radiographs would predict correction at first erect imaging for scoliosis patients undergoing anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT).

METHODS

Single-center retrospective review. Fifty-one patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis underwent anterior body tethering. Preoperative flexibility films and intraoperative radiographs were compared to first erect standing radiographs to determine if there was a correlation in Cobb angle.

RESULTS

Preoperative major Cobb angle measured 52° ± 9°. Major Cobb angle on bending films was 24° ± 8°. Intraoperative imaging showed correction to a mean of 17° ± 8°. Postoperative first erect standing radiographs showed correction to a mean of 26° ± 10°. The mean difference in major Cobb angle between intraoperative radiograph and a first erect radiograph was 10° ± 4°, whereas the mean difference from preoperative bending radiograph at first erect was 2° ± 7°. Thus, correction on preoperative flexibility films correlated with the first erect radiograph.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative bending radiographs provide a reasonable estimate of postoperative correction for patients undergoing AVBT with tensioning of the cord. Surgeons should expect the major Cobb angle to increase on first erect radiographs compared to intraoperative radiographs. These findings may guide patient selection and assist surgeons in achieving appropriate correction intraoperatively.

Return to sport and daily life activities after vertebral body tethering for AIS: analysis of the sport activity questionnaire

Purpose

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is an alternative to fusion for selected scoliosis patients. As VBT does not limit spine mobility, it has been propagated that this technique allows a quicker return to physical activity than fusion. However, no data are available to support this statement. Aim of this study was to quantify how much time patients required to resume preoperative activity level and to seek possible associations between return to physical activity and demographic, radiographic and surgical data.

Methods

One year postoperatively, the validated sport activity questionnaire (SAQ) was administered to all skeletally immature patients who underwent VBT at our institution. SAQ data were analyzed and a multivariate analysis was conducted to investigate associations between SAQ and demographic, radiographic and surgical data.

Results

Thirty-one patients aged 14.5 years completed the SAQ. Within 3 months from VBT, 97% returned to school, 61% resumed physical education, 97% carried a backpack, 68% run, and 82% rode a bike; 70% bent within a month from VBT. Ninety-four percent of patients returned to their preoperative athletic level. Within 3 months, 63% of responders resumed noncontact, 61% contact and 53% collision sports. No relevant associations were observed between the SAQ and demographic, radiographic and surgical data. In particular, number of instrumented vertebrae, level of the lowest instrumented vertebra and postoperative Cobb angle did not influence patients’ return to preoperative activities.

Conclusion

VBT allows patients to quickly return to their preoperative activity level, irrespectively of the postoperative Cobb angle or type of instrumentation.

Learning curve for vertebral body tethering: analysis on 90 consecutive patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is raising interest for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but many scoliosis surgeons have not been trained in anterior surgical approaches. We analyzed data of our first patients to define the learning curve for VBT. VBT has shown encouraging results in the treatment of growing AIS patients, but there is a paucity of data and long-term results are not yet available. To our best knowledge, there is no published data regarding the learning curve for VBT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed, of all consecutive patients who underwent VBT at our Institution. Outcomes of interest were intubation time, surgical duration and estimated blood loss per screw and hospitalization length. For the statistical analysis, we referred to a linear model regression diagnostic and we used the Pearson product-moment correlation (r) for pairwise correlation. The final effect ranked between + 1 and - 1.

RESULTS

Data of 90 patients were analyzed, age 14.6 ± 1.8 years. On average, 9.4 ± 2.6 levels were instrumented. Per screw, mean intubation time was 33.1 ± 7.6 min (r = - 0.57; p > 0.0001), mean surgical duration 21.3 ± 5.7 min (r = - 0.55; p > 0.0001), mean estimated blood loss 21.3 ± 18.2 ml (r = - 0.66; p > 0.0001). Mean hospitalization length was 8.3 ± 3.1 days (r = - 0.32; p = 0.002). No intraoperative complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

VBT has a rapid learning curve: the estimated blood loss per screw is expected to decrease by 60%, intubation time and surgical duration by over 50%, and hospitalization length by 32% for each treated patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Thoracoscopic Anterior Instrumentation and Fusion as a Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis on thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation and fusion as a treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to determine the current status of thoracoscopic instrumentation and fusion as a treatment for AIS.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Traditional surgical techniques for AIS have been open anterior thoracotomy with instrumentation and posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. With the growing clinical interest in growth modulation surgeries, such as vertebral body tethering, there is a resurgence of interest in a thoracoscopic technique.

METHODS

The most commonly used medical databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library) were searched up to November 2016 using the search terms VATS, thoracoscopic scoliosis, and thoracoscopic scoliosis instrumentation.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the strict inclusion criteria. Five hundred thirty patients were reported: 81.7% females, with the majority diagnosed as AIS. The mean operative time was 371.5 minutes, mean blood loss of 502.85 mL, and mean hospital stay of 5.9 days. Mean preoperative curve magnitude was 52.9°; postoperative curve magnitude was 17.9°, with a correction of 62.7%. Number of levels instrumented was 6.3, pulmonary function tests returned to preoperative values by 2 years postoperation, and the complication rate was 21.3%. Compared to thoracotomy, VATS had similar complication rates, blood loss, operation theater time, curve correction, and number of fused levels. Compared to posterior fusion, VATS has higher complication rates and operation theater time. Blood loss and percentage correction were similar. VATS had a smaller number of fused segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Advantages include less invasive, excellent curve correction, few levels fused, good satisfaction, and no long-term effect on pulmonary function. Drawbacks are increased operative time and incidence of pulmonary complications. With appropriate surgeon training and careful patient selection, this technique offers an acceptable alternative to the more traditional procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.