Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to gender, pelvic incidence and age

Parameters Used to Define Horizonal Gaze: A Systematic Review

Study designSystematic review.ObjectiveTo summarise the parameters available to measure horizontal gaze, provide their values in patients and/or asymptomatic individuals, and assess their reliability.MethodsA literature search was conducted on 9/9/2023 using Medline and Embase, applying the following keywords: "horizontal gaze" or "gaze line". Articles that reported on horizontal gaze were included.ResultsTwenty-six articles published between 2015 and 2023, were included, of which 15 reported on patients, 10 reported on asymptomatic individuals, and one reported on both. The three most reported horizontal gaze parameters were McGregor's slope (n = 20 studies, asymptomatic individuals range: -8.8-10.2°), C0-C2 angle (n = 18 studies, asymptomatic individuals range: -32.0-101.5°), and chin brow vertical angle (CBVA) (n = 12 studies, asymptomatic individuals range: -5.9-12.7°). The most frequently reported correlations were between McGregor's slope and C0-C2 angle (R,-0.390-0.676; P < 0.065; n = 4 studies), McGregor's slope and CBVA (R, 0.679-0.862; P < 0.0001; n = 3 studies), as well as CBVA and slope of the line of sight (R, 0.592-0.996; P < 0.001; n = 3 studies).ConclusionThe present systematic review identified 18 parameters used to measure horizontal gaze; however, there is no gold standard. Although parameters had good to excellent inter-observer reliabilities, there were large variations in measurements among asymptomatic individuals across studies, which may imply a limited clinical relevance. Therefore, there is a need for a gold standard parameter of horizontal gaze, which uses easily identifiable landmarks that are simple to measure (reliable), relates both orbital and cervical anatomical structures, and provides insight into compensatory mechanisms in deformative or degenerative conditions.

Laminectomy and fusion better maintains horizontal gaze than laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. While both procedures show similar clinical improvement, LF requires bony fusion while LP offers motion preservation. Cervical sagittal alignment and horizontal gaze maintenance are key outcome measures, but their comparative effects between LF and LP remain unclear. This study evaluated postoperative horizontal gaze and cervical sagittal alignment in patients undergoing either procedure.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study at 2 academic centers, patients underwent either LF or LP. Pre/postoperative cervical sagittal alignment parameters were collected, including C2-7 lordosis, C2-7 SVA, Occiput-C2 angle, and T1-slope. The McGregor slope measured horizontal gaze, with 8° flexion to 13° extension as normal range. Primary outcome was horizontal gaze maintenance at minimum 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in cervical spine alignment parameters.

Results

Sixty-four patients (30 LF, 34 LP) completed minimum 1-year follow-up. Pre/postoperative sagittal alignment measures showed no significant differences between groups. Within cohorts, LP increased C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (29.1-37.6 mm, p=.04) while LF decreased C2-7 lordosis (11.5°-5.00°, p=.04). Postoperatively, LF showed significantly more optimally aligned patients (90.0%) versus LP (57.8%) (p<.01). Multivariate analysis indicated LP predicted postoperative horizontal gaze malalignment (OR 13.90 [2.10-286.62], p=.022).

Conclusions

While both procedures yielded comparable cervical sagittal alignment outcomes, LF demonstrated superior maintenance of horizontal gaze. These findings suggest that laminectomy and fusion may preserve horizontal gaze better than laminoplasty.Level of Evidence: III.

Can C7 Slope Accurately Substitute for an Invisible T1 Slope According to Age and Cervical Morphology in Cervical Lateral Radiographs?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective radiologic study.

OBJECTIVES

To identify age-associated changes in T1 slope (T1S) and C7 slope (C7S), as well as the difference between T1S and C7S (△, which was defined as T1S minus C7S) and to explore the cervical morphology that C7S can be the most accurate alternative for the invisible T1S.

METHODS

625 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers received cervical lateral radiographs from August 2021 to May 2022. Occipito-C2 angle (O-C2), C2-7 angle (C2-7), cranial arch, caudal arch, C7S, and T1S were examined. Thereafter, the △ was established. The correlations among T1S, C7S, △ and other cervical sagittal parameters, and between age and other cervical sagittal parameters were evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Then, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare variations in cervical sagittal parameters among volunteers aged 40 to 59 years, 60 to 64 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 74 years, and ≥75 years of age, and among volunteers with 1 lordotic morphology, 2 lordotic morphology, straight morphology, kyphotic morphology, 1 sigmoid morphology, and 2 sigmoid morphology. Linear regression modeling of the correlation between C7S and T1S in various cervical alignment patterns was then established.

RESULTS

△ had the strongest correlation with caudal arch (r = .646), and weakest correlation with cranial arch (r = -.082). Age was significantly correlated with T1S (r = .250), C7S (r = .244), and △ (r = .112). Among them, △ was stable until 74 years after which it showed an elevation from 3.3° in the group 70-74 years to 4.1° in the group over 75 years. Moreover, there was marked variation between T1S and C7S at 1 lordotic, 2 lordotic, straight and 2 sigmoid alignment patterns, but no difference was seen between T1S and C7S at kyphotic and 1 sigmoid alignment patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a progressive increase in T1S, C7S, and △ with age. Linear regression equations for accurate prediction of T1S were developed based on the C7S in 1 lordotic, 2 lordotic, straight and 2 sigmoid alignment patterns. C7S may be a reliable proxy for T1S in kyphotic and 1 sigmoid alignment patterns.

Machine learning identifies clusters of the normal adolescent spine based on sagittal balance

PURPOSE

This study applied a machine learning semi-supervised clustering approach to radiographs of adolescent sagittal spines from a single pediatric institution to identify patterns of sagittal alignment in the normal adolescent spine. We sought to explore the inherent variability found in adolescent sagittal alignment using machine learning to remove bias and determine whether clusters of sagittal alignment exist.

METHODS

Multiple semi-supervised machine learning clustering algorithms were applied to 111 normal adolescent sagittal spines. Sagittal parameters for resultant clusters were determined.

RESULTS

Machine learning analysis found that the spines did cluster into distinct groups with an optimal number of clusters ranging from 3 to 5. We performed an analysis on both 3 and 5-cluster groups. The 3-cluster groups analysis found good consistency between methods with 96 of 111, while the analysis of 5-cluster groups found consistency with 105 of 111 spines. When assessing for differences in sagittal parameters between the groups for both analyses, there were differences in T4-12 TK, L1-S1 LL, SS, SVA, PI-LL mismatch, and TPA. However, the only parameter that was statistically different for all groups was SVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on machine learning, the adolescent sagittal spine alignments do cluster into distinct groups. While there were distinguishing features with TK and LL, the most important parameter distinguishing these groups was SVA. Further studies may help to understand these findings in relation to spinal deformities.

Full-body Postural Alignment Analysis Through Barycentremetry

STUDY DESIGN

A multicentric retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The study of center of mass (COM) locations (ie, barycentremetry) can help us understand postural alignment. The goal of this study was to determine relationships between COM locations and global postural alignment x-ray parameters in healthy subjects. The second objective was to determine the impact on the spinopelvic alignment of increased distance between the anterior body envelope and spine at the lumbar apex level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Unexplored relationship between COM location and spinopelvic parameters.

METHODS

This study included healthy volunteers with full-body biplanar radiographs, including body envelope reconstruction, allowing the estimation of COM location. The following parameters were analyzed: lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), cervical lordosis (CL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KFA), and sagittal odontoid-hip axis angle (ODHA). The following COM in the sagittal plane were located: whole body, at a thoracolumbar inflection point, and body segment above TK apex. The body envelope reconstruction also provided the distance between the anterior skin and the LL apex vertebral body center ("SV-L distance").

RESULTS

This study included 124 volunteers, with a mean age of 44±19.3. Multivariate analysis confirmed the posterior translation of COM above TK apex with increasing LL ( P =0.002) through its proximal component and posterior shift of COM at the inflection point with increasing TK ( P =0.008). Increased SV-L distance was associated with greater ODHA ( r =0.4) and more anterior body COM ( r =0.5), caused by increased TK ( r =0.2) and decreased proximal and distal LL (both r =0.3), resulting in an augmentation in SFA ( r =0.3) (all P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Barycentremetry showed that greater LL was associated with a posterior shift of COM above the thoracic apex, while greater TK was correlated with more posterior COM at inflection point. Whole-body COM was strongly correlated with ODHA. This study also exhibited significant alignment disruption associated with increased abdominal volume, with compensatory hip extension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-II.

Coronal alignment in normal individuals and moderate scoliosis: Normative values, variation with age and comparison with sagittal alignment

Introduction

Global coronal alignment is mainly assessed by C7 plumbline and central sacral vertical line (CSVL), pelvic obliquity and shoulder alignment. A detailed analysis is mandatory when treating spinal deformity. It remains unclear to what extent mild scoliosis influences global coronal alignment.

Research question

The objective was to define a comprehensive set of coronal alignment parameters and to investigate differences between individuals without spinal deformity and with mild scoliosis. The relationship between coronal and sagittal alignment and the influence of age were studied.

Methods

Radiographs of 236 normal individuals (Group N) and 140 patients with scoliosis <35° (Group S) were prospectively collected. Coronal parameters were femoral head distance and angle, pelvic obliquity, Maloney angle, L4 and L5 inclinations, coronal T1 pelvic angle, C7-CSVL and odontoid CSVL offset, coracoid distance and angle. Sagittal cervical, spinopelvic, thoracolumbar and global parameters were measured.

Results

There was no significant difference between groups N and S for coronal parameters, except for L4 and L5 inclinations with a mean difference of 3,3° (p < 0,001). Global coronal alignment kept constant throughout age groups in N and S groups. Sagittal parameters varied with age: C2-C7 lordosis (p < 0,001), T1-T12 kyphosis (p < 0,001), pelvic incidence (p < 0,001). There was no correlation between global coronal and sagittal alignment: R-values ranging from -0.2 to 0.2.

Conclusion

Global coronal parameters were comparable in normal individuals and in scoliosis <35°. Coronal plane parameters were not influenced by age. Sagittal plane parameters varied significantly with age. There was no direct link between coronal et sagittal alignment.

Horizontal Gaze Assessment: An Extensive Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

Bipedalism was a significant milestone in the evolutionary development of Homo sapiens sapiens, influencing neocortical evolution and subsequent behavioral changes. Coordinated visual and sensory inputs are crucial for posture, environmental interaction, and surgical planning, with horizontal gaze being a pivotal parameter. This narrative review aims to explore various geometric measures used to assess horizontal gaze in patients, highlighting their applications in surgical planning.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted in indexed databases using Mesh terms like "Cervical Vertebrae" and "Visual Fields" along with keywords such as "horizontal gaze" and "sagittal spine parameters." Among 477 initially identified articles, 41 were selected for inclusion after rigorous filtering.

RESULTS

The most recognized method for assessing horizontal gaze is the Chin Brow Vertical Angle (CBVA), initially described in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical photography is employed as a tool for CBVA calculation, while other measures like McGregor slope and Slope of the Line of Sight have been considered as alternatives to CBVA. Each method presents its unique advantages and limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the need for further research into horizontal gaze measurement methods. Developing novel approaches to determine horizontal gaze can significantly enhance surgical planning and, consequently, improve patient outcomes. The ongoing exploration of these geometric measures offers promising prospects for advancing the field and optimizing patient care.

Sex-dependent evolution of whole-body postural alignment with age

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to explore sex-related variations of global alignment parameters and their distinct evolution patterns across age groups.

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective study included healthy volunteers with full-body biplanar radiographs in free-standing position. All radiographic data were collected from 3D reconstructions: global and lower limb parameters, pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS). Lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK) and cervical lordosis (CL) were also assessed as well as the lumbar and thoracic apex, and thoracolumbar inflexion point. The population was divided into five 5 age groups: Children, Adolescents, Young, Middle-Aged and Seniors.

RESULTS

This study included 861 subjects (53% females) with a mean age of 34 ± 17 years. Mean PI was 49.6 ± 11.1 and mean LL was - 57.1 ± 11.6°. Females demonstrated a PI increase between Young and Middle-Aged groups (49 ± 11° vs. 55 ± 12°, p < 0.001) while it remained stable in males. SS and LL increased with age in females while remaining constant in males between Children and Middle-aged and then significantly decreased for both sexes between Middle-Aged and Seniors. On average, lumbar apex, inflexion point, and thoracic apex were located one vertebra higher in females (p < 0.001). After skeletal maturity, males had greater TK than females (64 ± 11° vs. 60 ± 12°, p = 0.04), with significantly larger CL (-13 ± 10° vs. -8 ± 10°, p = 0.03). All global spinal parameters indicated more anterior alignment in males.

CONCLUSION

Males present more anteriorly tilted spine with age mainly explained by a PI increase in females between Young and Middle-Aged, which may be attributed to childbirth. Consequently, SS and LL increased before decreasing at senior age.

C4 constant vertebra: a novel benchmark of physiological cervical sagittal alignment

BACKGROUND

Cervical sagittal alignment is essential, and there is considerable debate as to what constitutes physiological sagittal alignment. The purpose of this study was to identify constant parameters for characterizing cervical sagittal alignment under physiological conditions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in which asymptomatic subjects were recruited to undergo lateral cervical spine radiographs. Each subject was classified according to three authoritative cervical sagittal morphology classifications, followed by the evaluation of variations in radiological parameters across morphotypes. Moreover, the correlations among cervical sagittal parameters, age, and cervicothoracic junction parameters were also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 183 asymptomatic Chinese subjects were enrolled with a mean age of 48.4 years. Subjects with various cervical sagittal morphologies had comparable C4 endplate slope angles under all three different typing systems. Among patients of different ages, C2-C4 endplate slope angles remained constant. Regarding the cervicothoracic junction parameters, T1 slope and thoracic inlet angle affected cervical sagittal parameters, including cervical lordosis and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and were correlated with the endplate slope angles of C5 and below and did not affect the endplate slope angles of C4 and above. In general, the slope of the C4 inferior endplate ranges between 13° and 15° under different physiological conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the asymptomatic population, the C4 vertebral body maintains a constant slope angle under physiological conditions. The novel concept of C4 as a constant vertebra would provide a vital benchmark for diagnosing pathological sagittal alignment abnormalities and planning the surgical reconstruction of cervical lordosis.

Impact of C3 laminectomy on cervical sagittal alignment in cervical laminoplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty and C3-C6 laminoplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty is a modified laminoplasty technique that can preserve the semispinalis cervicis muscle attached to the C2 spinous process. Several previous studies have shown that this technique can lead to better outcomes of postoperative axial neck pain and C2-C3 range of motion (ROM) than conventional cervical laminoplasty. However, there is still a lack of understanding of total and proportional postoperative cervical sagittal alignment outcomes.

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative cervical alignment and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A single-center, patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included consecutive 126 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) who were scheduled for cervical laminoplasty from March 2017 to January 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were C2-C7 Cobb angle (CA) and neck disability index (NDI). Secondary outcomes measures included other clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters including segmental Cobb angle and presence of C2-C3 interlaminar fusion.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to either the C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty group (LN group) or the C3-C6 laminoplasty group (LP group) at a 1:1 ratio. Laminoplasty was performed using a unilateral open-door technique and stabilized with titanium mini plates. A linear mixed model analysis was employed to examine the longitudinal data from postoperative 1-year through 3-year. Additional analysis between three types of cervical sagittal alignment morphology was done.

RESULTS

Among 122 patients who were randomly allocated to one of two groups (LN group, n=61; LP group, n=61), modified intent-to-treat analysis was done for 109 patients (LN group, n=51, LP group, n=58) who had available at least a year of postoperative data. Postoperative C2-C7 CA was not significantly different between the two groups. However, NDI was significantly different between the two groups (12.8±1.0 in the LN group vs 8.6±1.0 in LP group, p=.005), which exceeded the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). The postoperative C2-C3 CA was significantly greater in the LN group (7.1±0.5° in LN group vs 3.2±0.5° in LP group, p<.001) while C4-C7 CA was significantly smaller in the LN group (3.9±0.8° in LN group vs 7.7±0.7° in LP group, p<.001) with greater cSVA in the LN group (31.6±1.4 mm in LN group vs 25.5±1.3 mm in LP group at postoperative 3-year, p=.002). Postoperative Euro-Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), numerical rating scores for neck pain (NRS-N) were significantly better in the LP group than in the LN group (all p<.05) and only EQ-5D surpassed the MCID. The C2-C3 fusion rate was significantly different between the LN group (9.8%) and the LP group (44.8%) (p<.001). The LN group showed a higher prevalence of a specific cervical alignment morphology characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis (S curve). This S curve demonstrated significantly unfavorable outcomes across multiple outcome variables.

CONCLUSION

The impact of C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty on postoperative kyphosis among patients with CSM or OPLL did not significantly differ from that of C3-C6 laminoplasty. However, C3 laminectomy in cervical laminoplasty might result in an unfavorable clinical outcome with an unbalanced cervical sagittal alignment characterized by a sigmoid shape with proximal lordosis and distal kyphosis.

Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in degenerative spinal deformity patients

INTRODUCTION

In asymptomatic subjects, variations of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and spinopelvic organization have been reported. A large range of compensation phenomena has been observed in degenerative spinal deformity in order to maintain horizontal gaze, but it remains unclear how age and spinopelvic morphology could additionally influence cervical alignment. The aim of this observational retrospective study was to describe the distribution of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in subjects with and without degenerative spinal deformity in order to precisely evaluate cervical compensation phenomena in adult spinal deformity (ASD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Radiographs of 478 subjects (327 females and 151 males) were distributed into 235 asymptomatic and 243 deformed subjects. Occipito-cervical parameters were McGregor-C1, McGregor-C2, C1-C2 and occipito-C2 angles. The cervicothoracic inflection point (CTIP) was determined. Caudal cervical sagittal alignment parameters were: C2-C7 lordosis, C2-apex (superior arch), apex-CTIP (inferior arch), occipito-C3 and occipito-C4 angles, C7-slope and T1-slope. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference (significant when Pr > 0.975 or Pr < 0.025). Comparisons between asymptomatic and deformed subjects were done after matching on age (40-60 years; > 60 years) and on PI (< 45°; 45-60°; > 60°).

RESULTS

Among occipito-cervical parameters, there was no significant change in McGregor-C1 angle. However, McGregor-C2 angle was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr = 0.0029), with influence of age (Pr = 0.023), but PI influence. C1-C2 lordosis was significantly higher in the ASD group compared to the asymptomatic group (Pr < 0.0007), without influence of age or PI noticed. C2-C7 lordosis was also higher in the ASD group (Pr < 0.025) with a role of age and PI (Pr < 0.025). Cervical lordosis in the superior arch was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr > 0.999), without influence of age or PI. In the inferior arch, the lordosis angle was not modified according to the group, but there was an influence of age (Pr < 0.0007). C7-slope and T1-slope were higher according the age group (Pr < 0.0012), without influence of the group or PI.

CONCLUSION

This observational study highlights cervical sagittal alignment adaptations in degenerative spinal deformity, matched on age and pelvic incidence. The inferior cervical spine seemed to be modified with a higher lordosis, increasing with age responding to the age-related thoracic kyphosis increase. In addition to that, the superior cervical spine hyperextends more in adult degenerative deformity to maintain horizontal gaze.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Description of age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment based on pelvic incidence classification in asymptomatic Chinese population

PURPOSE

To investigate the pelvic incidence (PI)- and age-related cervical alignment changes of Chinese healthy population.

METHODS

Six hundred and twenty-five asymptomatic adult subjects, who underwent the standing whole spinal radiograph, were recruited in this work. The sagittal parameters were measured, including Occipito-C2 angle (O-C2), C2-7 angle (C2-7), cranial arch, caudal arch, T1-slope (T1S), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), PI, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). All subjects were stratified into 5 age groups, namely 40-59 years, 60-64 years, 65-69 years, 70-74 years, and 75 years and above, with each age group further divided into 2 subgroups based on PI (deeming PI < 50° as low PI, and PI ≥ 50° as high PI). The correlations between PI or age, and other sagittal parameters were assessed. The age-related changes of sagittal parameters in each PI subgroup were also assessed, followed by one-way analysis of variance analysis for change comparison between age groups.

RESULTS

The average cervical sagittal parameters were as below: 18.2 ± 6.8° for O-C2, 10.4 ± 10.2° for C2-7, 3.9 ± 7.5° for cranial arch, 6.5 ± 7.1° for caudal arch, 23.6 ± 7.3° for T1S, and 21.0 ± 9.7 mm for C2-7 SVA. There was no obvious difference observed between PI and cervical sagittal parameters, excepting for caudal arch. While, C2-7, cranial arch, caudal arch, T1S, and C2-7 SVA increased remarkably with the age. Thereof, C2-7 exhibited great increases at the age of 60-64 years and 70-74 years, respectively, cranial arch increased notably at 60-64 years of age, and caudal arch developed obviously at 70-74 years of age, regardless of PI.

CONCLUSION

This study showed the PI- and age-related cervical alignment changes of Chinese healthy population. Based on the classification in our study, high or low PI apparently did not correlate with the occurrence of cervical degenerative disease.

Age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment: based on 625 Chinese asymptomatic subjects

PURPOSE

This work aimed to provide a comprehensive description of cervical alignment including cranial arch and caudal arch according to age, thus offering a reference database for cervical deformity treatment.

METHODS

Total 150 males and 475 females aged at 48-88 were enrolled from August 2021 to May 2022. Radiographic parameters were measured, including Occipito-C2 angle (O-C2), C2-7 angle (C2-7), cranial arch, caudal arch, T1-slope (T1s), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA). Pearson correlation coefficient was employed in analyzing associations among sagittal parameters and between age and each parameter. Five groups were set according to different age stages, namely group with age 40-59 (N = 77), group with age 60-64 (N = 189), group with age 65-69 (N = 214), group with age 70-74 (N = 97), and group with age exceeding 75 (N = 48). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was applied to compare multi-sets of cervical sagittal parameters (CSPs). Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used in assessing the relationships of various cervical alignment patterns with age groups.

RESULTS

T1s exhibited the strongest correlation with C2-7 (r = 0.655) and caudal arch (r = 0.561), and moderately correlated with cranial arch (r = 0.355). The positive correlations between age and C2-7 angle (r = 0.189, P < 0.001), cranial arch (r = 0.150, P < 0.001), caudal arch (r = 0.112, P = 0.005), T1s (r = 0.250, P < 0.001), as well as C2-7 SVA (r = 0.090, P = 0.024) were observed. Moreover, two progressive growths of C2-7 were shown after 60-64 and 70-74 years old, respectively. Thereof, cranial arch increased greatly after the age of 60-64, followed by a relative stability in the degeneration. The notable growth of caudal arch was observed after the age of 70-74, and the growth remained stable when exceeding the age of 75. The difference between cervical alignment patterns and age groups was obvious (Fisher's exact test P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This work explored in detail the normal reference values of cervical sagittal alignment including cranial arch and caudal arch under different age groups. Age-related changes in cervical alignment depended on the increase in the cranial and caudal arches in different proportions with age.

Analysis of Components of Upper Cervical Lordosis in Asymptomatic Lordotic and Kyphotic Subjects

BACKGROUND

Upper cervical lordosis (CL) can be divided into 2 components: C2 slope (C2S) and McGregor slope (MGS) or C0-1 and C1-2 angles. The aim of this study was to investigate the components of upper CL in asymptomatic kyphotic and lordotic subjects.

METHODS

CL, C0-2 Cobb angle, MGS, C2S, C1 Slope, C0-1 Cobb angle, C1-2 Cobb angle, T1 slope angular parameters, and the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis distance of 78 asymptomatic subjects were measured.

RESULTS

Sixty subjects had lordotic curvature and 18 had kyphotic curvature. There was a significant difference between the kyphotic and lordotic groups in all parameters, except for C0-1 Cobb angle and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis. In lordotic subjects, MGS and C2S accounted for 58% and 42% of the C0-2 angle, whereas in kyphotic subjects, 86% of C0-2 was accounted for by C2S. There was a strong negative correlation between C2S and MGS.

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic subjects, as CL decreases, MGS decreases, C2S increases, and the C0-2 angle turns down on the horizontal plane to maintain the horizontal gaze. Turning down the C0-2 angle is more important than its value for maintaining horizontal gaze; thus, the slopes (MGS and C2S) can better represent the upper and lower cervical alignment than angle values can. The relationship between upper and lower cervical alignment should be evaluated in terms of slope angles rather than simple angles. The lack of significant difference between the C0-1 angles in the kyphotic and lordotic groups suggests that only the C1-2 angle is involved in the compensatory mechanism for the horizontal gaze.

Association between Sagittal Cervical Spinal Alignment and Degenerative Cervical Spondylosis: A Retrospective Study Using a New Scoring System

(1) Background: Prolonged neck flexion is thought to cause harmful loading on the cervical spine. Along with the degenerative process, cervical alignment tends to change toward lordotic curvature. The association between cervical alignment and cervical spondylosis remains unclear. (2) Methods: Three raters retrospectively assessed cervical radiographies of outpatients at a tertiary center in 2019 using degenerative cervical spondylosis score (DCS score; a newly developed scoring system), C2-7 absolute rotational angle (ARA), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). (3) Results: A total of 561 patients were included in the analysis. Multiple regression analysis with adjustments for age and sex revealed that C2-7 ARA, rather than SVA, was a significant parameter for degenerative spondylosis. The interaction between age and C2-7 ARA was significant, indicating that the increase in DCS score with increasing age was more pronounced in patients with kyphotic cervical alignment. The direct effect of age on DCS score was 0.349 (95% CI 0.319 to 0.380, p < 0.001) and the proportion of the mediation effect of C2-7 ARA was −0.125 (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: C2-7 ARA was significantly associated with DCS after adjustment for both age and sex. Subjects with more kyphotic cervical alignment showed a greater correlation between increased DCS score and older age.