Georg schmorl prize of the German spine society (DWG) 2021: Spinal Instability Spondylodiscitis Score (SISS)-a novel classification system for spinal instability in spontaneous spondylodiscitis

Challenges and limitations of the existing scoring systems for postoperative outcomes in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of existing scoring systems for postoperative outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis treated with minimally invasive posterior fixation.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 90 patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis treated with minimally invasive posterior fixation between January 2014 and June 2024. We assessed the Brighton spondylodiscitis score (BSDS), spinal instability spondylodiscitis score (SISS), and spinal infection treatment evaluation (SITE) score. Patients were divided into success and failure groups based on infection control or implant failure. The predictive ability of each scoring system for treatment failure was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The success and failure groups consisted of 78 (87%) and 12 patients (13%), respectively, with the failure group including seven and five patients due to infection control or implant failure. The failure group had higher BSDS, SISS, and SITE scores, but the ROC analysis showed low predictive accuracy (AUC: BSDS = 0.65, SISS = 0.64, SITE score = 0.56). Grading the BSDS into three categories revealed no failure in the low-risk patients, whereas 22% of the high-risk patients required unplanned additional surgeries for infection control or implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing scoring systems showed limited ability to predict postoperative outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis treated with minimally invasive posterior fixation. BSDS grading demonstrated some utility, with 22% of high-risk patients experiencing postoperative infection control failure and implant failure, highlighting the need for careful treatment planning.

Management of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis in Adults

High index of suspicion, MRI, multidisciplinary collaboration, and CT-guided biopsy are the cornerstones for an early diagnosis of infectious spondylodiscitis. The incidence of spondylodiscitis admissions is increasing. A notable proportion of patients present with neurological deficit. Unfortunately, IV drug users, frail and immunocompromised patients, and patients with HIV are most susceptible to have pyogenic spondylodiscitis and its complications. These infections have a mortality rate of up to 20%. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis should be managed with at least 6 weeks of IV antibiotics. It is best to involve an infectious disease specialist because of the wide variety of organisms involved and the emergence of resistance. Neurological deficits, instability, pain, deformity, and frailty are the factors that decide whether and when to perform surgery. Surgery can reduce morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay for these debilitating infections. Some studies have recommended stabilization without aggressive débridement, especially in frail patients. Implants (titanium and PEEK) as well as bone grafts (autograft and allograft) are safe in pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Minimally invasive spinal surgery reduces blood loss, surgical time, and hospital stay over classical open surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery is useful for debulking the infection and obtaining samples for diagnostic purposes.

Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish Evaluation and Treatment of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis of the Spine: AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma and Infection

Study DesignLiterature Review with clinical recommendations.ObjectiveTo highlight impactful studies on pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS), identified by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma and Infection, with recommendations for their integration into clinical practice.MethodsFive influential studies on PS that have the potential to shape current practice in spinal infections were selected and reviewed. Each study was chosen for its contribution to a critical phase in PS management: diagnosis, imaging, surgical vs conservative treatment, and antibiotic duration. Recommendations were graded as strong or conditional following the GRADE methodology.ResultsFive studies were highlighted. Article 1: Pluemer et al introduced the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation (SITE) Score, a novel scoring tool for standardizing treatment decision-making. Conditional recommendation to incorporate the SITE Score or SISS Score for improved treatment outcomes. Article 2: Maamari et al conducted a meta-analysis comparing imaging modalities, with conditional recommendation to consider 18F-FDG PET/CT to diagnosis PS as an adjunct to MRI which remains the gold standard. Article 3: Thavarajasingam et al demonstrated the potential survival benefit of early surgery in specific PS cases, leading to a strong recommendation for early intervention in appropriate patients. Article 4: Neuhoff et al compared conservative and surgical treatments in well-resourced settings, concluding a strong recommendation for early surgery in appropriate patients. Article 5: Bernard et al evaluated antibiotic treatment duration, with a conditional recommendation for a 6-week course in confirmed cases, based on comparable efficacy to a 12-week regimen.ConclusionsManagement of PS remains complex and varied. This perspective provides spine surgeons with evidence-based recommendations to enhance standardization and effectiveness in clinical practice.

External performance of the spinal infection treatment evaluation (SITE) score and spinal instability spondylodiscitis score (SISS) in predicting operative intervention for de novo spinal infections

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As the incidence of de novo spinal infections has risen with increasing global medical complexity and intravenous drug use, so has the uncertainty around standard of care and surgical decision making. Nonoperative management has increased in popularity albeit with frequent failure rates in up to one-third of patients. Although clinical decision making has largely been guided by clinician experience and institutional preference, two recent scoring system-the Spinal Instability Spondylodiscitis Score (SISS) and the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation score (SITE) provide a promising potential avenue towards evidence-based pathways.

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study was to compare external performance of the SITE and the SISS score in predicting operative decision making in patients with de novo spinal infections seen at a tertiary urban referral center, using real-world clinical decision making as a comparison. A secondary aim was to elucidate areas with low reliability or floor or ceiling effects as possible targets for score improvement.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective external validation study utilizing consecutive cases from an academic tertiary referral center PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing treatment for spondylodiscitis or spinal epidural abscess OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the surgical intervention as the ground truth, the primary outcomes were performance metrics of the SITE and SISS score including receiver operating characteristic curves, specificity, sensitivity, and interrater reliability for both score and classification. Of note, the SITE score increases in severity with lower scores, whereas the SISS score increases in severity with higher scores.

METHODS

A panel of three blinded raters scored the clinical data.

RESULTS

Two-hundred thirteen patients were included, of which 62% (144/213) underwent nonoperative medical management and 38% (80/213) underwent operative management. Mean SITE numerical scores were lower (more severe) in the operative group (5.63 vs. 7.45, p<.001). The most frequent categorical group for the SITE score was "severe" in both the operative group (93%, 74/80, mean score 5.63) and the nonoperative group (68%, 90/133, mean score 7.45). The mean SISS score did not differ between operative and nonoperative groups (6.73 vs. 6.25, p=.2). ICC agreement was "almost perfect" for the SITE score (0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.89) and "substantial" for the SISS score (0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.76). Performance metrics for the SITE score were "good" (AUC 0.743, 95% CI 0.67-0.81), and for the SISS score were "poor" (AUC 0.557, 95% CI 0.47-0.64). ROC analysis for SITE identified a cutoff score of 6.5 to optimize sensitivity and specificity at 0.692 and 0.700, respectively. If using the established cutoff of 8 for "severe" infection as described in the original scoring system, the sensitivity was 0.813, specificity, 0.504, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.496, and negative predictive value (NPV) 0.817. ROC analysis for SISS similarly proposed a cutoff score of 8.0 which yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.350 and 0.797, respectively. If using the established cutoff of 10 for "unstable lesion" as described in the original scoring system, the sensitivity was 0.125, specificity 0.917, PPV 0.476, and NPV 0.635.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports external performance metrics for the SITE and SISS score, demonstrating good performance for SITE and poor performance for SISS in predicting operative intervention with almost perfect SITE and substantial SISS agreement among raters. Ceiling effects may limit clinical utility of the SITE score. Subscales which require raters to determine percent vertebral body involvement or posterolateral involvement performed worse. Future work can focus on further discrimination within the "severe" infection group and improvement of low-performing subscales to improve clinical impact.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of monosegmental pyogenic spondylodiscitis

OBJECTIVE

The study assessed the efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) as a treatment approach for monosegmental pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS), particularly in patients with compromised health conditions that reduce their ability to endure extensive surgical procedures.

METHODS

From January 2019 and December 2021, a total of 38 patients with PS who underwent PPSF at our hospital were included in the study. Clinical outcomes were assessed using physical examinations, serological tests, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and imaging assessments.

RESULTS

The mean duration of PPSF among all patients was 73.9 ± 13.9 min, with an average intraoperative blood loss of 52.4 ± 18.4 mL. Pathogenic bacteria were identified in 17 out of 38 cases, representing a detection rate of 44.7%. The mean follow-up period was 21.3 ± 8.3 months. Postoperative assessment of inflammatory markers indicated that infections were effectively controlled in 33 patients, resulting in symptomatic improvement. However, within 2 to 4 weeks postoperatively, 5 patients required a two-stage anterior debridement-fusion following the initial internal fixation. Compared to those who underwent posterior internal fixation alone, these patients had significantly higher Spinal Instability Spondylodiscitis Scores (12.000 ± 1.000 vs. 9.030 ± 2.114, p < 0.05) and a significantly greater prevalence of preoperative epidural abscesses (80% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PPSF may serve as a viable option for patients with monosegmental PS, providing a minimally invasive surgical approach for patients who are unable to tolerate traditional open surgery due to compromised health or advanced age. For patients with significant spinal instability or abscess formation, a two-stage anterior debridement-fusion may be required. However, single-stage posterior internal fixation can effectively relieve pain and improve the overall condition of patients, thereby enhancing their ability to tolerate subsequent anterior surgical interventions.

Evaluation of the SITE score for de-novo spinal infection patients in clinical practice - A case-based approach

Study design

Validation study.

Introduction

De-novo spinal infections (DNSI) are a concerning healthcare problem. The treatment is established case-based in the absence of clear guidelines. The recently proposed Spinal-Infection-Treatment-Evaluation (SITE) score combines clinical and radiological variables to support decision-making, but it has not been validated among non-spine surgeons.

Research question

We aimed to validate this novel score in a real-life setting among surgeons from different clinical specialties.

Methods

A single-center study was conducted from 1/10/2023 until 31/12/2023. We collected clinical and radiological data of DNSI patients, treated at our institution. We created fifteen representative specific case presentations, including all spinal locations. A survey was designed to distribute the specific case presentations among physicians from the departments that agreed to participate. Participants were asked to score each case by using the SITE score and calculated intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC3).

Results

Forty-eight survey forms were analyzed (seven spine-surgeons, 41 others) Spine surgeons demonstrated good interobserver reliability (ICC3 = 0.78). Non-spine surgeons showed poor interobserver reliability (ICC3 = 0.48). Subgroup analysis by specialty revealed overall low reliability scores (internal medicine ICC3 = 0.48, orthopaedics ICC3 = 0.43, other surgical specialties ICC3 = 0.56, infectiology ICC3 = 0.55). Participants with more frequent exposure to DNSI (>10 per year; n = 9) showed higher reliability, achieving similar scores to spine surgeons (ICC3 = 0.7).

Discussion and conclusions

We found acceptably high interobserver values for the SITE score only for spine surgeons and non-spine surgeons with frequent exposure to DNSI. The reliability of the score was much lower when applied by physicians from other specialties with lesser experience of DNSI.

The Development of New Scoring System to Define the Presence of Instability and the Need of Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - Jakarta Instability Score

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review, expert opinion and Delphi technique, and validity and reliability studies.

OBJECTIVE

We developed Jakarta Instability Score (JIS) to identify spinal instability and the need of fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

This study consisted of systematic review to find predictors of spinal instability, expert opinion and modified Delphi technique to develop JIS, and validity and reliability studies of the newly developed JIS.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies were included in the systematic reviews to obtain predictors of spinal instability. Through expert opinion and modified Delphi technique, JIS was developed and consisted of the clinical component (back pain), dynamic radiograph component (dynamic translation and angulation), and MRI component (facet joint effusion), each of the component would be scored, and the total scoring would be from 0 to 14. The final scoring would classify patients into three groups: stable group (score of 0 to 4) in which the fusion is not needed, potentially unstable group (score of 5 to 8) in which the decision of fusion is based on surgeon's clinical judgment, and unstable group (score of 9 to 14) in which the fusion is needed. Final step of study concluded that this JIS had a high validity and reliability.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed JIS was a valid and reliable scoring system that could help to identify the presence of instability in LSS and can be used as a guideline to decide whether spinal fusion will be needed.

Diagnosis and management of de novo non-specific spinal infections: European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) Spine Section Delphi consensus recommendations

Introduction

The management of de novo non-specific spinal infections (spondylodiscitis - SD) remains inconsistent due to varying clinical practices and a lack of high-level evidence, particularly regarding the indications for surgery.

Research question

This study aims to develop consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of SD, addressing diagnostic modalities, surgical indications, and treatment strategies.

Material and methods

A Delphi process was conducted with 26 experts from the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). Sixtytwo statements were developed on diagnostic workup, management decisions, surgical techniques, non-surgical treatment, and follow-up and submitted to the panel of experts.

Results

Consensus was reached on 38 of 62 statements. MRI was confirmed as the gold standard for diagnosis. Regarding surgical indications, the panel agreed that any new neurological deficit, even subtle, warrants surgical consideration. Motor deficits with a motor score (MRC) below 4 and bladder or bowel dysfunction were unanimously considered clear indications for surgery. For spinal deformity and instability, thresholds such as kyphosis >20°, scoliosis >10°, and vertebral body collapse >50% were established to guide surgical decision-making. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was endorsed whenever feasible, and a 12 week antibiotic treatment regimen was favored in cases of complicated infections.

Discussion and conclusion

This EANS consensus provides updated recommendations for SD management, incorporating recent evidence on improved outcomes with surgical therapy. While these guidelines offer a more structured approach to clinical decision-making, further research is required to optimize surgical timing and validate the long-term impact of these treatment strategies.

Peripherally inserted central venous catheter in outpatient antibiotic spinal infection treatment is safe, effective and leads to significant reduction in healthcare expenses

Prolonged antibiotic therapy is often recommended for the treatment of spinal infections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for spinal neurosurgery patients with spondylodiscitis. We carried out a retrospective study involving 67 patients who were administered peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for IV antibiotic treatment from January 2020 to December 2022. We assessed patient data concerning infections and neurosurgical concerns. Each patient underwent a minimum of 6 weeks of IV antibiotics, both as inpatients and outpatients. The study included 67 patients with a median age of 61 years (SD +/- 14.18 years), with approximately 44% being female. The average hospital stay for inpatient treatment was 20 days (SD +/- 8.8 days). Subsequent outpatient antibiotic therapy lasted an average of 70.32 days (SD +/- 18.24 days), with outpatient IV therapy accounting for 44.74 days (SD +/- 9.15 days). The most common pathogens identified were Staphylococcus epidermidis and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiological analysis did not detect any pathogens in 18% of patients. Radiographic and laboratory evidence of spondylodiscitis was absent in 99% of patients during the final follow-up. No catheter-related complications occurred. Outpatient IV antibiotic therapy using a PICC line catheter is a safe and effective treatment option for spinal infections, especially in elderly patients.

Comparative analysis of different treatment strategies for septic spondylitis: a retrospective study of one hundred and twelve patients

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical efficacy and prognosis differences between conservative treatment and surgical treatment in patients with non-serious neurologically intact pyogenic spondylitis (Nsi-Nsni-PS), and to provide theoretical reference for the clinical treatment of Nsi-Nsni-PS patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 112 cases of Nsi-Nsni-PS patients treated in our hospital from June 2016 to June 2021. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into conservative treatment group (53 cases) and surgical treatment group (59 cases). The general data, laboratory tests, imaging examinations, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic use, VAS for pain before and after treatment, ODI, local kyphotic angle correction of diseased vertebrae, and recurrence rate were collected and analyzed in both groups. SPSS 26.0 statistical software was used for analysis. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and independent sample t-test or rank sum test was used for comparison between groups, while variance analysis was used for intra-group comparison. Count data were expressed as number (%) and compared between groups using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the changes in local kyphotic angle between the two groups. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in general data and imaging characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05); there were no statistically significant differences in the positive culture rate of pathogens, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic use, treatment complications, WBC, CRP, ESR levels at admission and discharge, VAS and ODI at admission and last follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). The WBC and CRP levels of patients in the conservative group at discharge were lower than those in the surgical group (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the decrease in inflammatory indicators (WBC, CRP, ESR) between the two groups (P > 0.05). By the last follow-up, the neurological function of patients in both groups had significantly improved compared to admission (P < 0.05), with 12 out of 15 ASIA grade D patients in the conservative group recovering to grade E, and 21 out of 25 grade D patients in the surgical group recovering to grade E, with no worsening of neurological function in either group. The differences in VAS and ODI scores at the last follow-up compared to before treatment were statistically significant in both groups (P < 0.05), and all patients regained normal activity. Compared with before treatment, the correction degree of local kyphotic angle in the surgical group at the last follow-up was 0.93 ± 4.94°, slightly higher than that in the conservative group (-0.83 ± 3.37°), and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

During our follow-up, we found that both conservative and surgical treatments achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes in patients with Nsi-Nsni-PS. Compared to conservative treatment, surgical intervention did not demonstrate significant advantages in reducing hospitalization time and antibiotic usage duration, increasing pathogen culture positivity rate, lowering treatment complications, or controlling recurrence. However, surgical intervention showed superiority in correcting the local kyphotic angle of spinal lesions, albeit with relatively increased surgical trauma, risks, and treatment costs. At the last follow-up, the surgical group did not exhibit better long-term efficacy. Therefore, when formulating clinical treatment strategies for patients with Nsi-Nsni-PS, it may be preferable to prioritize conservative treatment, supplemented by the use of sensitive or empiric antibiotics for infection management, to improve patient prognosis.

A retrospective review of gram-negative spinal infections in a single tertiary spinal centre over six years

Aims

Gram-negative infections are associated with comorbid patients, but outcomes are less well understood. This study reviewed diagnosis, management, and treatment for a cohort treated in a tertiary spinal centre.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of all gram-negative spinal infections (n = 32; median age 71 years; interquartile range 60 to 78), excluding surgical site infections, at a single centre between 2015 to 2020 with two- to six-year follow-up. Information regarding organism identification, antibiotic regime, and treatment outcomes (including clinical, radiological, and biochemical) were collected from clinical notes.

Results

All patients had comorbidities and/or non-spinal procedures within the previous year. Most infections affected lumbar segments (20/32), with Escherichia coli the commonest organism (17/32). Causative organisms were identified by blood culture (23/32), biopsy/aspiration (7/32), or intraoperative samples (2/32). There were 56 different antibiotic regimes, with oral (PO) ciprofloxacin being the most prevalent (13/56; 17.6%). Multilevel, contiguous infections were common (8/32; 25%), usually resulting in bone destruction and collapse. Epidural collections were seen in 13/32 (40.6%). In total, five patients required surgery, three for neurological deterioration. Overall, 24 patients improved or recovered with a mean halving of CRP at 8.5 days (SD 6). At the time of review (two to six years post-diagnosis), 16 patients (50%) were deceased.

Conclusion

This is the largest published cohort of gram-negative spinal infections. In older patients with comorbidities and/or previous interventions in the last year, a high level of suspicion must be given to gram-negative infection with blood cultures and biopsy essential. Early organism identification permits targeted treatment and good initial clinical outcomes; however, mortality is 50% in this cohort at a mean of 4.2 years (2 to 6) after diagnosis.

Anterior Column Reconstruction of Destructive Vertebral Osteomyelitis at the Thoracolumbar Spine with an Expandable Vertebral Body Replacement Implant: A Retrospective, Monocentric Radiological Cohort Analysis of 24 Cases

BACKGROUND

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) often necessitates surgical intervention due to bone loss-induced spinal instability. Anterior column reconstruction, utilizing expandable vertebral body replacement (VBR) implants, is a recognized approach to restore stability and prevent neurological compromise. Despite various techniques, clinical evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of these implants in VO remains limited.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis, spanning 2000 to 2020, was conducted on 24 destructive VO cases at a Level 1 orthopedic trauma center. Diagnosis relied on clinical, radiological, and microbiological criteria. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, surgical interventions, and radiological outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

The study included 24 patients (62.5% male; mean age 65.6 ± 35.0 years), with 58% having healthcare-associated infections (HAVO). The mean radiological follow-up was 137.2 ± 161.7 weeks. Surgical intervention significantly improved the bi-segmental kyphotic endplate angle (BKA) postoperatively (mean -1.4° ± 13.6°). However, a noticeable loss of correction was observed over time. The study reported a mortality rate of 1/24.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior column reconstruction using expandable VBR effectively improved local spinal alignment in destructive VO. However, the study underscores the necessity for prolonged follow-up and continuous research to refine surgical techniques and postoperative care. Addressing long-term complications and refining surgical approaches will be pivotal as the field progresses.

The new clinical classification of metastatic spinal malignancies serves as a vital reference for surgical management: a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

It is commonly accepted that surgical treatment is an essential component of the comprehensive management of metastatic spinal malignancies. However, up until now, the clinical classification of metastatic spinal malignancies has not been well-structured.

METHODS

After IRB approval, 86 patients with metastatic spinal malignancies were adopted. According to the vascular distribution, stability of vertebrae, and degree of nerve compression, metastatic spinal malignancies can be classified into five types. Tumors classified as type I typically appear in the vertebral body. Type II tumors are those that develop in the transverse processes, superior and inferior articular processes, and spinal pedicles. Type III denotes malignancies that are present in the spinous process and vertebral plate. Types IVa and IVb are included in type IV. Type IVa combines type I and type II, whereas type IVb combines type II and type III. Type V tumors are those of types I, II, and III that co-occur and spread in different directions into the spinal canal. 20 of included 86 patients who did not receive segmental arterial embolization were set as the non-embolization group. The embolization group included 24 patients who received segmental arterial embolization on both sides of the diseased vertebrae. 42 patients were included in the offending embolization group after receiving responsible arterial embolization. A surgical intervention was performed within 24 h following an embolization. Surgical intervention with the purpose of removing as much of the tumor as possible and providing an effective reconstruction of the spinal column.

RESULTS

In comparison with the non-embolization group and embolization group, the offending embolization group presented unique advantages in terms of bleeding volume (p<0.001), operation time (p<0.001), and local recurrence rate within 12 months (p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

By significantly reducing surgical trauma and local recurrence rate (12 months), responsible arterial vascular embolization procedures together with associated surgical protocols developed on the basis of the clinical classification of metastatic spinal malignancies, are worthy of clinical dissemination.

Posterolateral full-endoscopic debridement and irrigation is effective in treating thoraco-lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis, except in cases with large abscess cavities

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and poor prognostic factors of posterolateral full-endoscopic debridement and irrigation (PEDI) surgery for thoraco-lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

We included 64 patients (46 men, 18 women; average age: 63.7 years) with thoracic/lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis who had undergone PEDI treatment and were followed up for more than 2 years. Clinical outcomes after PEDI surgery were retrospectively investigated to analyze the incidence and risk factors for prolonged and recurrent infection.

RESULTS

Of 64 patients, 53 (82.8%) were cured of infection after PEDI surgery, and nine (17.2%) had prolonged or recurrent infection. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that significant risk factors for poor prognosis included a large intervertebral abscess cavity (P = 0.02) and multilevel intervertebral infections (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PEDI treatment is an effective, minimally invasive procedure for pyogenic spondylodiscitis. However, a large intervertebral abscess space could cause instability at the infected spinal column, leading to prolonged or recurrent infection after PEDI. In cases with a large abscess cavity with or without vertebral bone destruction, endoscopic drainage alone may have a poor prognosis, and spinal fixation surgery could be considered.

A novel scoring system concept for de novo spinal infection treatment, the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score (SITE Score): a proof-of-concept study

OBJECTIVE

De novo infections of the spine are an increasing healthcare problem. The decision for nonsurgical or surgical treatment is often made case by case on the basis of physician experience, specialty, or practice affiliation rather than evidence-based medicine. To create a more systematic foundation for surgical assessments of de novo spinal infections, the authors applied a formal validation process toward developing a spinal infection scoring system using principles gained from other spine severity scoring systems like the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score, and AO Spine classification of thoracolumbar injuries. They utilized an expert panel and literature reviews to develop a severity scale called the "Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score" (SITE Score).

METHODS

The authors conducted an evidence-based process of combining literature reviews, extracting key elements from previous scoring systems, and obtaining iterative expert panel input while following a formal Delphi process. The resulting basic SITE scoring system was tested on selected de novo spinal infection cases and serially refined by an international multidisciplinary expert panel. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for cutoff value analysis. The predictive validity was assessed through cross-tabulation analysis.

RESULTS

The conceptual SITE scoring system combines the key variables of neurological symptoms, infection location, radiological variables for instability and impingement of neural elements, pain, and patient comorbidities. Ten patients formed the first cohort of de novo spinal infections, which was used to validate the conceptual scoring system. A second cohort of 30 patients with de novo spinal infections, including the 10 patients from the first cohort, was utilized to validate the SITE Score. Mean scores of 6.73 ± 1.5 and 6.90 ± 3.61 were found in the first and second cohorts, respectively. The ICCs for the total score were 0.989 (95% CI 0.975-0.997, p < 0.01) in the first round of scoring system validation, 0.992 (95% CI 0.981-0.998, p < 0.01) in the second round, and 0.961 (95% CI 0.929-0.980, p < 0.01) in the third round. The mean intraobserver reliability was 0.851 ± 0.089 in the third validation round. The SITE Score yielded a sensitivity of 97.77% ± 3.87% and a specificity of 95.53% ± 3.87% in the last validation round for the panel treatment decision.

CONCLUSIONS

The SITE scoring concept showed statistically meaningful reliability parameters. Hopefully, this effort will provide a foundation for a future evidence-based decision aid for treating de novo spinal infections. The SITE Score showed promising inter- and intraobserver reliability. It could serve as a helpful tool to guide physicians' therapeutic decisions in managing de novo spinal infections and help in comparison studies to better understand disease severity and outcomes.

Case Report: Campylobacter fetus caused pyogenic spondylodiscitis with a presentation of cauda equina syndrome after instrumented lumbar fusion surgery

Spondylodiscitis with/without neurologic impairment is a serious infection, predominantly occurring in high-risk patients. Campylobacter fetus caused spondylodiscitis is very rare. Evidence-based therapeutic concepts for lumbar spondylodiscitis are lacking. A 64-year-old high-risk woman underwent decompression with instrumented lumbar fusion. Six months after index surgery, she developed pyelonephritis, which deteriorated to sepsis and presentation of cauda equina syndrome. She underwent urgent revision with decompression, debridement, and instrumentation removal, and received long-term antibiotics. Culture grew Campylobacter fetus, previously not reported as a cause of spondylodiscitis after elective instrumented lumbar fusion. Emergent debridement and removal of instrumentation, with 2 months of targeted intravenous antibiotics followed by 6 weeks of oral antibiotics led to complete spondylodiscitis resolution. Prompt diagnostics and targeted antibiotic treatment are paramount when dealing with spinal infections, particularly in patients with rare causative pathogens like Campylobacter fetus. Concomitant neurological complications may require emergent surgical management in the case of cauda equina syndrome.