Surgical outcome of an anatomical resection of clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer assisted with a video-thoracoscopy

Virtual randomized study comparing lobectomy and particle beam therapy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in operable patients

To the best of our knowledge there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing lobectomy-a standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-and particle beam therapy (PBT), the best performing existing radiotherapy. We conducted a virtual randomized trial in medically operable patients with stage IA NSCLC to compare lobectomy and PBT effectiveness. A Markov model was developed to predict life expectancy after lobectomy and PBT in a cohort of patients with stage IA NSCLC. Ten thousand virtual patients were randomly assigned to each group. Sensitivity analyses were performed as model variables and scenarios changed to determine which treatment strategy was best for improving life expectancy. All estimated model parameters were determined using variables extracted from a systematic literature review of previously published articles. The preferred strategy differed depending on patient age. In young patients, lobectomy showed better life expectancy than that of PBT. The difference in life expectancy between lobectomy and PBT was statistically insignificant in older patients. Our model predicted lobectomy as the preferred strategy when operative mortality was under 5%. However, the preferred strategy changed to PBT if operative mortality post lobectomy was over 5%. For medically operable patients with stage IA NSCLC, our Markov model revealed the preferred strategy of lobectomy or PBT regarding operative mortality changed with varying age and comorbidity. Until randomized controlled trial results become available, we hope the current results will provide a rationale background for clinicians to decide treatment modalities for patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Extraction bag lavage cytology during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Sample extraction from the thoracic cavity through an intercostal space during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery can result in cancer cell contamination by tumour crushing and tumour cell extravasation, and may have adverse effects on the surgical outcome. Lavage cytology of the sample extraction bag was investigated to clarify the risk of cancer cell spillage and identify the clinicopathological features associated with susceptibility to cancer cell spillage during extraction.

METHODS

Lavage cytology of the sample extraction bag was investigated in 464 patients with negative pleural lavage cytology who underwent lung resection for primary lung cancer via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery between January 2010 and December 2012. The surgical procedures, pathological findings and clinical course were evaluated by hospital record review.

RESULTS

The incidence of positive bag lavage cytology (BLC) was 13.6%. Statistically significant factors associated with susceptibility to BLC positivity were tumour size, standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography, pathological features such as pathological N score, pleural invasion, vascular invasion and papillary-predominant adenocarcinoma. Among patients with Stage I lung cancer, the survival rate was significantly lower in the BLC-positive group than in the BLC-negative group.

CONCLUSIONS

BLC positivity can be related to oncological characteristics such as tumour invasiveness and adhesiveness as opposed to tumour size and surgical margin, and may help to determine the prognosis of Stage I lung cancer. The sample extraction bag must be carefully manoeuvred through the intercostal space to prevent cancer cell dissemination to the chest wall or thoracic cavity.