Resection combined with imatinib therapy for liver metastases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Recurrent/Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Proportions

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic and recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) present challenging clinical management. Imatinib is the standard first-line therapy, improving survival and reducing tumor burden in the neoadjuvant use, facilitating surgical intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of neoadjuvant imatinib in metastatic/recurrent GISTs, highlighting its potential to enhance surgical outcomes and overall patient management.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Scopus (end-of-search: February 13, 2025) for records on neoadjuvant imatinib therapy in recurrent/metastatic GISTs. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with common-effect and random-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis were performed, addressing heterogeneity and examining any potential association between the factors that varied and the outcomes reported. The present meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

The search identified 957 articles, and 14 were analyzed. The meta-analysis of proportions indicated that 2-year and 5-year PFS were 76% (95% CI 58-88%) and 43% (95% CI 17-74%), respectively, while 2-year and 5-year OS were 84% (95% CI 78-89%) and 60% (95% CI 51-68%), respectively. The pooled R0 resection rate was 82% (95% CI 64-92%), associated positively with that of radiological partial response (PR) (β = 3.92, p < 0.001). Further meta-regression analysis yielded no significant association with preoperative imatinib duration.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis of trials and studies on metastatic or recurrent GISTs highlights key insights into post-surgery patient outcomes following neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib. Pooled effect estimates revealed promising 2-year and 5-year PFS rates of 76% and 43%, respectively, and 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 84% and 60%, respectively. Furthermore, the high pooled R0 resection rate of 82% emphasizes a substantial surgical efficacy in this population, while it was significantly correlated with successful R0 resections in patients with favorable outcomes.

Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are sarcomas that arise from the muscular layer of the gastrointestinal tract. The stomach is the most common location, followed by the small intestine. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment; extensive margins and lymphadenectomy are not routinely required. Commonly utilized resection techniques include wedge gastrectomy, excision and closure of the gastrotomy, and anterior gastrotomy access with internal wedge resection. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can be utilized in the neoadjuvant setting for cases where a reduction in tumor size would optimize resection, and in the adjuvant setting for high-risk tumors. In select cases, metastasectomy may improve prognosis.

Surgical Management of Sarcoma Metastatic to Liver

Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal tumors with a propensity for hematogenous metastasis. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common histologic subtype and the most common source of hepatic metastases. In the case of metastatic GIST, neoadjuvant imatinib can be used as a selection tool for the judicious application of surgery, where treatment-responsive patients who undergo resection to prevent the development of treatment-resistant clones have associated 10-year actuarial survival of 40%. Further advances for many of the non-GIST sarcoma subtypes will depend on the development of improved systemic therapies and evaluation of their activity in subtype or molecularly defined trials.

Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour who are in complete radiological remission: a prospective multicentre phase II study

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is considered incurable, and life-long treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is recommended. We investigated whether selected patients with metastatic GIST may remain in durable remission despite imatinib discontinuation.

PATIENTS

In this 1-group, prospective, multicentre phase II trial selected patients with oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) GIST discontinued imatinib treatment. Eligible patients had been treated with imatinib >5 years without progression and had no radiologically detectable metastases after metastasectomy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or complete response to imatinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 3-years after stopping imatinib. Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The trial closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Between January 5, 2017, and June 5, 2019, 13 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 discontinued imatinib. The median follow-up time was 55 months (range, 36 to 69) after study entry. Five (42%) of the 12 eligible patients remained progression free, and seven (58%) progressed with a median time to progression 10 months. Median PFS was 23 months and the estimated 3-year PFS 41%. Six of the seven patients who progressed restarted imatinib, and all six responded. Three-year OS was 100%, and all patients were alive at the time of the study analysis. QoL measured 5 and 11 months after discontinuation of imatinib demonstrated improvement compared to the baseline.

INTERPRETATION

A substantial proportion of selected patients with oligometastatic GIST treated with imatinib and metastasis surgery/RFA may remain disease-free for ≥3 years with improved QoL after stopping of imatinib.

Liver resection for metastatic GIST tumor improves survival in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Survival for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been increasing over the years after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, the role of metastasectomy for GIST is still controversial. Patients are currently treated with imatinib or sunitinib in case of imatinib failures as optimal medical therapy for metastatic GIST.

METHODS

The Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Overall survival following liver resection ± tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for metastatic GIST was compared to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including both randomized control trials and retrospective cohort studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 988 patients. Seven studies encompassed data on 556 patients with isolated liver metastases (219 surgery ± drug groups and 337 drug-only groups) were included. Overall survival was significantly improved in patients undergoing liver resection ± drug therapy in comparison to drug therapy alone. [HR (95%CI) = 2.10 (1.58, 2.79); p<0.00001]. Subgroup analysis showed that patients also had improved progression free survival based on 4 studies. [HR (95%CI) = 1.92 (1.43, 2.56); p<0.00001]. In case of concurrent liver and peritoneal metastases, patients showed improved overall survival with aggressive surgical approaches based on 10 studies. [HR (95%CI) = 1.90 (1.56, 2.31); p<0.00001].

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that liver resection for patients with metastatic GIST regardless of peritoneal metastases improved progression free and overall survival in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as compared with medical therapy alone. Furthermore, liver resections did not have any immediate detrimental impact on survival in the group of patients selected.

Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

Advances of endoscopic and surgical management in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

As one of the most common mesenchymal malignancies in the digestive system, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) occur throughout the alimentary tract with diversified oncological characteristics. With the advent of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era, the treatment regimens of patients with GISTs have been revolutionized and GISTs have become the paradigm of multidisciplinary therapy. However, surgery resection remains recognized as the potentially curative management for the radical resection and provided with favorable oncological outcomes. The existing available surgery algorithms in clinical practice primarily incorporate open procedure, and endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery together with combined operation techniques. The performance of various surgery methods often refers to the consideration of risk evaluation of recurrence and metastases; the degree of disease progression; size, location, and growth pattern of tumor; general conditions of selected patients; and indications and safety profile of various techniques. In the present review, we summarize the fundamental principle of surgery of GISTs based on risk assessment as well as tumor size, location, and degree of progress with an emphasis on the indications, strengths, and limitations of current surgery techniques.

Might Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Benefit from Operative Management? A Population-Based Retrospective Study

Background

With respect to effect of surgery on the therapy of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (mGISTs), still no consensus has been reached. This research designed to investigate the effect of surgical treatment on prognosis in patients with mGISTs.

Methods

The population-based study consisted of 6282 GIST patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2016, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database registry. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox model were employed for the exploration of the effect of surgery on overall survival (OS) and GIST-specific survival (GSS).

Results

In total, 6282 patients were diagnosed with GISTs, including 1238 (19.7%) mGIST patients and 5044 (80.3%) non-mGIST patients. Compared with the patients with non-mGISTs, metastatic patients assumed relatively lower proportion of surgical management (756 [61.1%] vs. 4666 [92.5%], P < 0.001). Based on unadjusted analysis, mGIST patients with operative management presented higher five years OS together with GSS in comparison with those without operative management (OS: 58.3% vs. 33.1%, P < 0.001; GSS: 61.6% vs. 36.7%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis found that no surgery was correlated to more than 2-fold increased death risk (OS, adjusted HR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.90-2.71; GSS, adjusted HR = 2.42, 95% CI: 2.00-2.93).

Conclusion

Metastatic GIST patients could potentially benefit from operative management with improved GSS and OS.

Hepatic metastases in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: oncologic outcomes with curative-intent hepatectomy, resection of treatment-resistant disease, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection for metastatic GIST (mGIST) is often performed with either curative-intent or for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant lesions. The efficacy of hepatectomy for treatment-resistant lesions (TRL) is uncertain.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with liver-mGIST treated from 2003 to 2018. Oncologic outcomes including overall (OS), post-operative progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

We identified n = 91 patients; 31 (34%) underwent curative-intent hepatectomy, 60 (66%) were initially managed with TKI alone, and 17 (19%) had resection of a TRL. The median follow-up for resected patients was 102 months (range 5-209 months) with 23 (25%) managed with a major hepatectomy. Patients having curative-intent hepatectomy had 72% 10-year OS following diagnosis of liver-mGIST, compared with 58% (P = 0.50) for TRL resection and 41% (P = 0.01) for non-resected patients. Curative-intent hepatectomy (HR 0.39, P = 0.03) and age (HR 1.04, P = 0.004) were independently associated with 10-year OS, but not TRL resection. TRL resection was not associated with improved post-progression OS compared to second-line TKI therapy (HR 0.61, P = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative-intent hepatectomy is associated with improved OS in liver-mGIST. The oncologic benefit of resecting treatment-resistant liver-mGIST compared to second-line TKI therapy alone remains unclear in the era of multi-line TKI therapy.

Health-Related Quality of Life and Side Effects in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), resulting in a substantial gain in median overall survival. Subsequently, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become more relevant. Here, we systematically review the available literature on HRQoL issues and side effects of different TKIs registered for the treatment of GIST.

METHODS

A search through five databases was performed. Full reports in English describing HRQoL outcomes and/or side effects in GIST patients on TKI therapy were included.

RESULTS

A total of 104 papers were included; 13 studies addressed HRQoL, and 96 studies investigated adverse events. HRQoL in patients treated with imatinib, regorafenib, and ripretinib remained stable, whereas most sunitinib-treated patients reported a decrease in HRQoL. Severe fatigue and fear of recurrence or progression were specifically assessed as HRQoL issues and had a negative impact on overall HRQoL as well as psychological and physical well-being. The majority of studies focused on physician-reported side effects. Nearly all GIST patients treated with a TKI experienced at least one adverse event, mostly mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that almost all patients treated with a TKI experienced side effects, this did not seem to affect overall HRQoL during TKI therapy. In daily practice, it are the side effects that hamper a patient's HRQoL resulting in treatment adjustments, suggesting that the reported side effects were underestimated by physicians, or the measures used to assess HRQoL do not capture all relevant issues that determine a GIST patient's HRQoL.

Locoregional Treatments for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in British Columbia: A Retrospective Cohort Study from January 2008 to December 2017

Simple Summary

It is not known if surgery, radiation treatment (RT) or other types of locolregional treatment (LRT) may be beneficial for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (mGIST) in addition to systemic treatment. Our study aims to address this question by analyzing a cohort of 127 mGIST patients in British Columbia over a decade (from January 2008 to December 2017). We showed that mGIST patients who underwent surgery and LRT seemed to have better survival when compared to patients who did not undergo surgery and LRT. However, this treatment strategy should only be considered in patients with limited volume metastatic disease or oligoprogression while the rest of the disease is well controlled with systemic treatment. In addition, RT can offer palliative benefits such as pain relief and bleeding control. Our study, consistent with other retrospective studies, supports LRT consideration in selected mGIST patients within a multidisciplinary setting. This approach is not considered as a “standard of care” due to lack of prospective clinical trials but may improve clinical outcome for some mGIST patients.

Abstract

Introduction: The role of surgery and non-surgical locoregional treatments (LRT) such as radiation therapy (RT) and local ablation techniques in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is unclear. This study examines LRT practice patterns in metastatic GIST and their clinical outcomes in British Columbia (BC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with either recurrent or de novo metastatic GIST from January 2008 to December 2017 were identified. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed in patients who underwent LRT, including surgical resection of the primary tumor or metastectomy, RT, or other local ablative procedures. Results: 127 patients were identified: 52 (41%) had de novo metastasis and 75 (59%) had recurrent metastasis. Median age was 67 (23–90 years), 58.2% were male, primary site was 33.1% stomach, 40.2% small intestine, 11% rectum/pelvis, and 15.7% others. 37 (29.1%) of patients received palliative surgery, the majority of which had either primary tumor removal only (43.3%) or both primary tumor removal and metastectomy (35.1%). A minority of patients underwent metastectomy only (21.6%). A total of 12 (9.5%) patients received palliative RT to metastatic sites only (58.3%) or primary tumors only (41.7%), mostly for symptomatic control (n = 9). A few patients (n = 3) received local ablation for liver metastatic deposits with 1 patient receiving microwave ablation (MWA) and 2 receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Most patients (n = 120, 94.5%) received some type of systemic treatment. It is notable that prolonged progression free survival (PFS) was observed for the majority of patients who underwent surgery in the metastatic setting with a median PFS of 20.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 14.29–40.74) months. In addition, significantly higher median overall survival (mOS) was observed in patients who underwent surgery (97.15 months; 95% CI: 77.7-not reached) and LRT (78.98 months; 95% CI: 65.58-not reached) versus no surgery (45.37 months; 95% CI: 38.7–64.69) and no LRT (45.27 months; 95% CI: 33.25–58.66). Almost all patients (8 out of 9) achieved symptomatic improvement after palliative RT. All 3 patients achieved partial response and 2 out of 3 patients had relatively durable responses of 1 year or more after local ablation. Discussion: This study is among the first to systematically examine the use of various LRT in metastatic GIST management. Integration of LRT with systemic treatments may potentially provide promising durable response and prolonged survival for highly selected metastatic GIST patients with low volume disease, limited progression and otherwise well controlled on systemic treatments. These observations, consistent with others, add to the growing evidence that supports the judicious use of LRT in combination with systemic treatments to further optimize the care of metastatic GIST patients.

Current treatment strategies and future perspectives for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that originate from the gastrointestinal tract, mostly from the stomach. GISTs are derived from the myenteric interstitial cells of Cajal and are caused by several mutations in the c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes. Clinically, GISTs are detected by endoscopic and imaging findings and are diagnosed by immunostaining. Surgery is the first line of treatment, and if the tumor is relatively small, minimally invasive surgery such as laparoscopy is performed. In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy has been administered to patients with GISTs that are suspected of having a large size or infiltration to other organs. Postoperative adjuvant imatinib is the standard therapy for high-risk GISTs. It is important to assess the risk of recurrence after GIST resection. However, the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use will vary by the mutation of c-kit genes and the site of mutation. Furthermore, information regarding gene mutation is indispensable when considering the treatment policy for recurrent GISTs. This article reviews the clinicopathological characteristics of GISTs along with the minimally invasive and multidisciplinary treatment options available for these tumors. The future perspectives for diagnostic and treatment approaches for these tumors have also been discussed.

[Surgical and interdisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors]

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The treatment of GISTs has been revolutionized since imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors were introduced for the treatment of GISTs, which inhibit the tyrosine kinases c‑KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) alpha. Even after the introduction of this targeted treatment GISTs can only be cured by surgical resection. With interdisciplinary multimodal treatment the prognosis of metastasized GIST can now be further improved by surgical resection of the primary tumor and the metastases, potentially leading to a cure. Neoadjuvant therapy can reduce the extent of surgical resection and hereby enable organ preservation and reduce surgical morbidity. To evaluate molecular and clinical predictors and to offer an optimal therapeutic plan, patients with GISTs and certainly patients with advanced GISTs should be evaluated by interdisciplinary sarcoma boards.

Recurrence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor 12 years after repeat hepatectomies for liver metastases: report of a case

No consensus has been reached on the postoperative treatment and follow-up duration for high-risk malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We herein report a case of recurrent liver metastasis from gastric GIST in a patient who had been receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate for 10 years. A 78-year-old woman underwent local gastrectomy for a 20-cm gastric GIST with a mitotic index of 25/50 high-power fields (HPF) 17 years before. Partial hepatectomy for recurrent liver metastases was repeatedly performed 14 and 12 years before. After the second hepatectomy, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate was given for 10 years, during which no recurrence was observed. Two years after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, computed tomography revealed a 2-cm hepatic tumor; thus, laparoscopic partial hepatectomy was performed. Histopathological findings revealed a liver metastasis of gastric GIST with a mitotic count of 20/50 HPF and MIB-1 labeling index of 20%. Mutation analysis of the KIT gene revealed an exon 11 mutation. The patient is currently undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate. The combination of surgery and long-term adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk malignant GIST and liver metastases may be effective to achieve a good prognosis.

Staged surgical approach for metastatic GIST, how far should we go? Case report

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is an uncommon mesenchymal neoplasm that commonly arises from the stomach and proximal small intestine but can develop in any part of the gastrointestinal tract. The disease can range from primary localized to an advanced metastatic unresectable disease in up to 30% of patients. Usually, metastasis involves the liver, peritoneum, and occasionally the lungs. The current standard treatment of localized resectable tumors is complete oncological resection, while advanced metastatic GISTs treatment remains contentious.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 34 years old pregnant female presenting with a 3 days history of multiple episodes of hematemesis and melena. Laboratory investigations were unremarkable except for severe anemia (Hgb 4.4 g/dL). After further investigations a diagnosis of duodenal GIST (DGIST) with liver metastasis was made. She received and showed good response to neoadjuvant Imatinib therapy, which was followed by a successful 2-stage surgery in the form of extended right hepatectomy and Whipple procedure with a good survival.

Clinical dissection

The evolution of Imatinib had a tremendous impact on surgery in metastatic GIST even in initially unresectable cases, thereby providing a better survival. However, the duration of neoadjuvant Imatinib course and the matter of resistance are still unclear those necessitating the use of different agents or the surgical approach.

Conclusion

Although with the advancements in surgical approaches and perioperative care, liver resection might be a curative option. The role of surgery in advanced GIST remains a controversial matter that needs critical selection of cases based on further future research.

•

GIST is considered a relatively rare entity, accounting for only 1% of all primary gastrointestinal tumors with the incidence being 10-13 per million population per year.

•

We present a case of a 34 pregnant female presenting with vomiting blood and passing melena, which after further examination and investigation was revealed to be due to a duodenal GIST.

•

The evolution of Imatinib had a tremendous impact on surgery in metastatic GIST even in initially unresectable cases.

Surgical Management of Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Unfortunately, acquired c-kit mutations cause secondary resistance to imatinib in a median of 18-24 months. Sunitinib and regorafenib are multi-kinase inhibitors that can be used as second-line or third-line therapy in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GISTs, respectively. Ripretinib (a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor) has recently been approved for fourth-line treatment in metastatic GIST. The TKI avapritinib has been approved for metastatic GIST harboring the imatinib-resistant PDGFRA exon 18 mutation. Although TKI therapies have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic GISTs, they cannot cure metastatic GISTs. Therefore, cytoreductive surgery is of considerable interest and has been accordingly investigated. Retrospective non-randomized studies demonstrated the feasibility and safety of continuous TKI therapy and surgical resection. Most studies demonstrate response to TKI therapy, completeness of resection, extent of disease, and surgical complexity as predictors of outcomes. Most TKIs can be stopped shortly before surgery and restarted shortly after. There is no known survival benefit from debulking operations or R2 resections and this should not be considered. However, debulking/palliative surgery may be necessary for patients with complications of hemorrhage, pain, or intestinal obstruction. SDH-deficient GISTs have an indolent natural history despite metastatic disease and may be another uncommon subgroup that would benefit from surgical debulking (R2 resection). At the time of operation, care should be taken to avoid tumor rupture. After surgical resection, patients should resume tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy as soon as possible and be monitored for disease progression. In all patients with metastatic GIST, the decision to pursue metastasectomy for GIST should be made in a multidisciplinary setting and be individualized according to patient age, comorbidities, functional status, symptoms, mutation status, extent of disease, completeness of resection, TKI response, and goals of the patient.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors.

METHODS

Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.

Comparison of long-term survival outcome after curative hepatectomy between selected patients with non-colorectal and colorectal liver metastasis: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is an established treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). However, the role of hepatectomy for non-colorectal liver metastasis (NCLM) is less clear.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From 2004 to 2017, 264 patients received curative hepatectomy for NCLM (n = 28) and CLM (n = 236). Propensity score (PS) matching was performed between two groups, with respect to the significant confounding factors. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between PS matched groups. Univariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors affecting overall and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

After PS matching, there were 28 patients in NCLM group and 56 patients in CLM group. With a median follow-up of 34 months, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival rate between NCLM and CLM groups (62% vs. 39%) (P = 0.370). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was also comparable between NCLM and CLM groups (23% vs. 22%) (P = 0.707). Use of pre-operative systemic therapy (hazard ratio: 2.335, CI 1.157-4.712), multifocal tumors (hazard ratio: 1.777, CI 1.010-3.127), tumor size (hazard ratio: 1.135, CI 1.012-1.273), R1 resection (hazard ratio: 2.484, CI 1.194-5.169) and severe complications (hazard ratio: 6.507, CI 1.454-29.124), but not tumor type (NCLM vs. CLM), were associated with poor overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy for NCLM can achieve similar oncological outcomes in selected patients as those with CLM. Significant prognostic factors were identified associating with worse overall survival.

Surgical Management of Sarcoma Metastatic to Liver

Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal tumors with a propensity for hematogenous metastasis. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common histologic subtype and the most common source of hepatic metastases. In the case of metastatic GIST, neoadjuvant imatinib can be used as a selection tool for the judicious application of surgery, where treatment-responsive patients who undergo resection to prevent the development of treatment-resistant clones have associated 10-year actuarial survival of 40%. Further advances for many of the non-GIST sarcoma subtypes will depend on the development of improved systemic therapies and evaluation of their activity in subtype or molecularly defined trials.

Solitary peritoneal metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report

BACKGROUND

A gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract that is most commonly found in the stomach. Recurrence of GISTs mostly occurs in the liver or peritoneum, and in most cases, multiple metastases occur. As a solitary peritoneal metastasis is rare, an appropriate treatment strategy has not been established. Here, we report a case of solitary peritoneal metastasis after complete resection of gastric GIST.

CASE SUMMARY

A 76-year-old woman was diagnosed with stomach GIST and underwent laparoscopic local resection using the CLEAN-NET method. As the recurrence risk was intermediate, adjuvant imatinib therapy was not administered. Two years after surgery, routine computed tomography revealed an abdominal mass between the dorsal side of the right hepatic lobe and right kidney. Other imaging tests did not reveal any abnormalities. Laparoscopic observation showed that the tumor was located at the retroperitoneum, and intraperitoneal dissemination was not found. Therefore, we performed laparoscopic tumor resection. Immunohistochemically, the tumor was positive for c-kit and CD34 and had a relatively high mitotic index and MIB-1 Labeling index. We administered adjuvant imatinib therapy. There was no evidence of recurrence 3 years after the operation.

CONCLUSION

This is the first reported case of a solitary recurrence of GIST in the peritoneum treated with complete laparoscopic resection.

Resection Combined with TKI Therapy for Resectable Liver Metastases of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: Results from Three National Centres in China

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences in the efficacy of hepatic resection combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI therapy alone and the timing of the TKI therapy and hepatic resection for resectable liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 43 patients confirmed to have resectable liver metastases from GISTs who received TKI treatment alone or the therapy model of hepatic resection combined with TKIs and were admitted to one of 3 institutions between January 2006 and December 2017.

RESULTS

For all liver metastases patients, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 97.67%, 88.98% and 66.46%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 85 months. Patients who underwent hepatic resection combined with TKI therapy had a significantly better OS and a trend towards improved progression-free survival (PFS) than patients who received TKIs alone (P = 0.001, mOS 102 months versus 51 months; P = 0.077, mPFS 42 months versus 30 months). Hepatic resection combined with TKI therapy was the only prognostic factor for long-term survival in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.198, 95% CI 0.048-0.813, P = 0.025). Compared with patients who underwent hepatic resection combined with postoperative TKIs only, patients who underwent hepatic resection combined with perioperative TKIs had a significantly better PFS (P = 0.032, mPFS 29 months versus 19 months) but did not have a significantly better OS (P = 0.662, mOS 92 months versus 102 months). Resection combined with perioperative TKI therapy was the only prognostic factor for PFS in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.295, 95% CI 0.101-0.862, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with resectable liver metastases, hepatic resection combined with TKI therapy was more beneficial in terms of improving prognosis than TKIs alone. In terms of the timing of TKI therapy and hepatic resection, resection combined with perioperative TKIs may prolong PFS more than resection combined with postoperative TKIs only.

Preoperative therapy with sunitinib malate in a patient with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor and liver metastases: A case report

RATIONALE

Patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are often found to have liver metastases at their 1st presentation. Most patients need preoperative treatment to reduce the size of the liver metastases to increase the possibility of surgical resection. Currently, imatinib mesylate is the drug of 1st choice for preoperative treatment and sunitinib malate (SM) is seldom used. Here we report a case of GIST with liver metastases where SM was used as a preoperative treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 56-year-old worker presented with intermittent abdominal pain and eating difficulties.

DIAGNOSES

An enhanced computed tomography scan showed a 15 × 15 × 10 cm malignant mass in the upper abdomen, and 2 metastases (15.1 × 13.1 cm and 14.8 × 8.8 cm) in the liver. The postcaval and middle hepatic veins were compressed by the liver metastases, making radical resection very difficult.

INTERVENTIONS

First the primary tumor in the jejunum was resected, and then SM was used as a preoperative treatment to reduce the size of the liver metastases to improve the possibility of surgical resection.

OUTCOMES

Both liver metastases regressed considerably in size and it was then possible to perform a radical resection.

LESSONS

The SM has the potential to be used as preoperative therapy for GIST with large liver metastases. This method provides a new option for the preoperative treatment of GIST with liver metastases.

The Role of Surgical Resection Following Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background The benefit of surgical resection for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) following tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment was still under debate. The present meta-analysis was designed to assess the value of surgical resection for the prognosis of patients with metastatic, recurrence and unresectable GISTs. Methods A systematic search of PubMed Central, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database was performed. Relevant studies of the role of surgery in advanced GISTs published before 1 May 2019 were identified. The quality of studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed through software Stata 15.0. Results A total of 6 retrospective studies including 655 patients were analyzed. The pooled result revealed that surgical resection group was associated with better PFS (HR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.76; P<0.001) and better OS (HR = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.59 to 2.85; P<0.001) compared with TKIs treatment alone group. Conclusions Surgical resection following TKIs treatment could significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced GISTs.

Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable liver metastases of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Results from three national centres in China

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes after curative intent radiofrequency ablation and resection in patients with resectable liver metastases of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GISTs) after pre-operative tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from 25 patients diagnosed with resectable liver metastases from GISTs who received pre-operative TKI treatment, who received radiofrequency ablation or resection and post-operative TKI treatment, and who were admitted to 3 institutions from January 2009 to December 2017.

RESULTS

Ten patients (10/25, 40.00%) underwent RFA combined with post-operative TKI treatment, and 15 (15/25, 60.00%) patients were treated with hepatic resection combined with post-operative TKI treatment. There were fewer post-operative complications (10.00% vs. 53.33%, P = 0.04) and shorter length of stay (4 vs. 9 days, P = 0.00) in the RFA group. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 100.00%, 75.00%, 55.00%, respectively. The RFA group had a lower median PFS (P = 0.007, mPFS: 9 months versus 29 months), but overall survival was not influenced by the treatment modality compared with the resection group (P = 0.413, mOS: 47 months versus not reached).Hepatic resection combined with post-operative TKI treatment was the only prognostic factor for PFS in univariate analysis (HR = 0.071, 95% CI: 0.007-0.759, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with resectable liver metastases from GISTs after receiving pre-operative TKI treatment, compared with resection, ablation seemed to be associated with shorter progression-free survival, but RFA offered comparable overall survival, and the post- procedure morbidity and lengths of stay were significantly lower. With complete ablation of the targeted tumours, our results suggest that RFA is an acceptable option in selected patients.

Role for targeted resection in the multidisciplinary treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor

The management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has evolved in the modern era due to the discovery of c-kit mutations and the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Until the advent of TKIs such as imatinib, the median survival reported for patients with advanced GIST was 19 months. Although surgery is the treatment of choice for resectable primary GIST, its role in cases of recurrence and metastasis remains to be unclear. This review outlines the potential beneficial role of repeat surgical resection in the multidisciplinary treatment of advanced GIST in the era of TKIs.

Treatment of metastatic, imatinib refractory, gastrointestinal stroma tumor with image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of CT- or MRI-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) in the treatment of advanced, imatinib refractory, metastatic gastrointestinal stroma tumors (GISTs) was the objective of this retrospective study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A cumulative number of 40 unresectable metastases (30 hepatic, 10 peritoneal) were treated with iBT in 10 selected patients with histologically proven GISTs. Six patients had peritoneal disease, and 5 patients were even progressing under sunitinib (second line)-thus iBT was applied as a salvage maneuver. IBT uses an interstitially introduced ¹⁹²iridium source in a high-dose-rate irradiation regime to destroy vital cells in a single fraction. Response to treatment was assessed clinically and with acquisition of MRI/CT every 3 months.

RESULTS

Local tumor control was reached in 97.5% of all treated metastases during a median time of 25 months-only one local relapse was observed during followup. The median diameter of the irradiated lesions was 2.4 cm (range 0.6-11.2 cm); a median dose of 15 Gy (range 6.7-21.96 Gy) was applied. The median progression-free survival after iBT was 6.8 (range 3.0-20.2) months; the median overall survival was 37.3 months (range 11.4-89.7). Two major complications (Common Terminology for Adverse Events grade 3) occurred following the intervention: local hemorrhage and pneumothorax, successfully dealt with by angiographic embolization and pleural drainage, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with metastatic, imatinib refractory GISTs, iBT safely enables high rates of local tumor control and presents an alternative, anti-neoplastic treatment option even in a salvage situation.

Role of surgical resection for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of surgical resection for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of surgery combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors among patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Wanfangdata without language restriction. Random effect models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratio and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis and trim and fill analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1416 patient from 9 studies were finally enrolled in this meta-analysis. The summary results showed that surgery combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors showed a tendency of a longer overall survival compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment alone (HR by random-effects model 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85, I2 = 44.7%) and improved progress-free survival (HR by random-effects model 0.50,95% CI, 0.33-0.76, I2 = 17.9%). The trim and fill analysis and sensitive analysis indicated the relatively robust result.

CONCLUSION

Surgery combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy is associated with a better overall survival and progression free survival for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors as compared with TKIs treatment alone.

Outcomes After Surgical Resection Differ by Primary Tumor Location for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): a Propensity Score Matching Population Study

PURPOSE

Primary tumor location has been identified as an important prognostic factor among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The purpose of this study is to identify how primary tumor location may affect outcomes after resection for patients with metastatic GISTs.

METHODS

Patients with GISTs and distant metastases at diagnosis were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients that underwent surgery were matched to patients that did not undergo surgery using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

After PSM, 570 patients were identified (males 334 [58.6%], females 236 [41.4%], age 62 ± 13.9 years). Gastric tumors constituted the majority (325 [57%]), followed by small intestinal (136 [23.9%]), colorectal (19 [3.3%]), and retroperitoneal/peritoneal tumors (23 [4%]). Median follow-up was 25.5 months (95% CI 23-29 months). Undergoing surgery was associated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS) on both univariate (median not reached vs. 51 months, p < 0.001) and multivariate analyses (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.23-11.12, p < 0.001). A sub-analysis of patients with gastric GISTs showed that undergoing surgery was the only significant factor associated with improved DSS (median not reached vs. 39 months, p < 0.001, HR 2.95, 95% CI 1.92-4.53). In contrast, undergoing surgery was not associated with improved survival for small intestinal, colorectal, or retroperitoneal/peritoneal tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for gastric metastatic GISTs is associated with improved survival. No discernible benefit after surgical resection was identified for patients with small intestinal, colorectal, retroperitoneal, or peritoneal metastatic GISTs.

Surgery for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: to whom and how to?

Although imatinib is a standard treatment for metastatic or recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), acquired c-kit mutations reportedly cause secondary resistance to imatinib. Sunitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that can be used as second-line therapy in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GISTs. For sunitinib-resistant or -intolerant GISTs, regorafenib is a standard third-line treatment. Although TKI therapies have revolutionized the treatment of recurrent or metastatic GISTs, they cannot cure GISTs. Therefore, in the era of TKIs, role of cytoreductive surgery for recurrent or metastatic GISTs has been discussed. Retrospective studies of treatment strategies with front-line surgery prior to imatinib have shown that initial cytoreduction confers no benefit in cases of advanced or recurrent GIST, and administering imatinib is the principle treatment. Most retrospective studies report cytoreductive surgery to be feasible in patients with metastatic GIST whose disease is stable or responsive to imatinib. Cytoreductive surgery may be indicated in limited disease progression refractory to imatinib when complete resection is possible, but case selection is critical. Cytoreductive surgery for metastatic GIST treated with sunitinib seems less feasible because of high rates of incomplete resections and complications. The role of cytoreductive surgery for metastatic GISTs would be difficult to establish in a prospective study; individualized treatments need to be carefully designed based on c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) mutations and other factors.

Management of liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors: where do we stand?

The recommended management of liver metastases (LM) from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) disease consists of perioperative administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and surgical resection. The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy of this therapeutic approach. Studies reporting outcomes for patients underwent liver resection from metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were overviewed. Eleven studies were included, which enrolled 240 patients with liver metastasis from GISTs. A median overall survival (OS) interval of 41.8 months was calculated while a median disease free interval of 17.9 [17-43] months following resection was also measured. Recurrences were recorded in 63 patients. Prognostic factors identified by the studies included surgical resection, R0 resection, age <55 years, clinical response to TKIs, pre- and postoperative administration of TKIs. The included studies highlight the importance of complete resection and the timing of resection, as well underline the importance of pre- and post-operative administration of TKIs.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with liver metastases: An 18-year experience from the GIST cooperation group in North China

Approximately 40% to 50% of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients will have recurrence or metastases after resection of the primary lesion, and the most common affected sites will be liver and peritoneum. Imatinib has been considered as the first-line therapy of metastatic GIST. Surgery for metastases is proposed when possible. Furthermore, there are controversies concerning hepatic resection and systemic tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The therapeutic conditions and long-term outcome of GIST patients with liver metastases in northern China remain unknown.The clinical, pathological, and follow-up data of 144 GIST patients, who had liver metastases between June 1996 and June 2014 from 3 tertiary cancer centers in northern China, were reviewed.Thirty-two cases (22.2%) had hepatectomy with 23 (23/32, 71.9%) R0 resections and 9 (9/32, 28.1%) R1/R2 resections, respectively. Twenty-three patients were given imatinib postoperatively. Furthermore, 98 (68.1%) patients were given TKIs only to control disease progression, and sunitinib was considered after imatinib failure in 12 patients. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate was 82%, 51%, and 24%, with a median overall survival of 48 months for all patients. Patients who had hepatic resection combined with TKIs had a tendency of improved outcome, and the median survival time was 89 months. This was in contrast to patients who received TKIs only, in which median survival time was 53 months. Patients who received imatinib plus sunitinib had a tendency of longer survival time, compared with patients who received imatinib only (not reached vs 50 months).TKIs combined with hepatic resection had a role in improving the outcome of GIST patients with liver metastases.

Prediction of long-term survival in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: analysis of a large, single-institution cohort

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients with metastatic GIST become long-term survivors, and a more precise prediction of outcome could improve clinical decision-making.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One-hundred and thirty-three patients diagnosed with metastatic GIST from 1995 to 2013 were identified from the sarcoma database at Oslo University Hospital. Clinical data prospectively registered in the database were supplemented with retrospective review of medical records. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifteen patients with metastatic GIST were included in the final study cohort. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 years (95% CI 5.6-8.3). Factors associated with long-term survival in univariate analysis were good baseline performance status (ECOG ≤1; p < .001), young age (p = .022), oligometastatic disease (OMD) (≤3 metastases; p < .001), maximum tumor diameter <5 cm (p < .001), surgery for metastatic disease (p = .005), surgery of the primary tumor (p < .001), normal baseline hemoglobin level (p = .05), normal baseline albumin level (p = .001) and normal baseline neutrophil count (p = .03). On multivariate analysis, good performance status, small tumor diameter and, OMD were the factors associated with long-term survival. Five and 10-year OS for patients with OMD were 89% and 71%, respectively, compared to 38% and 20% for patients with polymetastatic disease (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-institution cohort of patients, OMD was as a strong prognostic factor in patients with metastatic GIST. Patients with OMD had an outcome similar to patients with high-risk localized disease, and should be regarded as a separate category among patients with metastatic GIST.

Percutaneous microwave ablation liver partition and portal vein embolization for planned hepatectomy due to large gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastases: A case report

RATIONALE

The liver is the most frequent site of relapse of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Surgery is always considered to be unsuitable because of the multiple metastases.

PATIENT CONCERNS

In this report, we describe a case of large, multiple GIST liver metastases that were treated with percutaneous microwave ablation liver partition and portal vein embolization for planned hepatectomy (PALPP). A 44-year-old woman had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy 4 years previously because of the diagnosis of a large duodenal GIST. Large, multiple liver metastases were observed 2 years later.

DIAGNOSES

GIST liver metastasis was diagnosed using percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy.

INTERVENTIONS

After 6 months of treatment with imatinib, the liver metastasis was stable. PALPP was performed because of insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) and right trisegmentectomy was successfully completed 10 days later.

OUTCOMES

The patient has had no signs of local or systemic disease during 17 months of postsurgical follow-up.

LESSONS

PALPP provides a new methodology for treatment of GIST liver metastasis in patients with insufficient FLR, and may have benefit in prolonging a durable remission.

Role of surgical resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases

It is widely accepted that the indications for hepatectomy in colorectal cancer liver metastases and liver metastases of neuro-endocrine tumors result in relatively better prognoses, whereas, the indications and prognoses of hepatectomy for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM) remain controversial owing to the limited number of cases and the heterogeneity of the primary diseases. There have been many publications on NCNNLM; however, its background heterogeneity makes it difficult to reach a specific conclusion. This heterogeneous disease group should be discussed in the order from its general to specific aspect. The present review paper describes the general prognosis and risk factors associated with NCNNLM while specifically focusing on the liver metastases of each primary disease. A multidisciplinary approach that takes into consideration appropriate timing for hepatectomy combined with chemotherapy may prolong survival and/or contribute to the improvement of the quality of life while giving respite from systemic chemotherapy.

Indications for surgery in advanced/metastatic GIST

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are a relatively rare entity and often present as a locally advanced tumour or with metastatic disease. Complete surgical resection is the only means of cure in localised disease; however, imatinib therapy has greatly advanced the management of GIST and is established as both an adjunct to surgery in high-risk cases and as principle therapy in metastatic disease. Surgery in advanced GIST has undergone a renaissance in recent years with the potential for a combined treatment approach with either neoadjuvant imatinib in locally advanced primary disease or as an adjunct to imatinib in those with metastases or recurrent disease. Neoadjuvant imatinib can render a locally advanced primary GIST resectable, allow less invasive procedures or promote preservation of function, especially if the tumour is located in an anatomically difficult position. The role of surgery in metastatic or recurrent disease is more controversial and case selection is critical. The potential benefit is difficult to quantify, although surgery may have a limited favourable impact on progression-free survival and overall survival for those patients whose disease is responding to imatinib or those with limited focal progression. Patients with imatinib resistant disease should not be offered surgery unless as an emergency where palliative intervention may be justified.

Resection of liver metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib era: A nationwide retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Liver metastases are common in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). In the absence of randomized controlled clinical trials, the effectiveness of surgery as a treatment modality is unclear. This study identifies safety and outcome in a nationwide study of all patients who underwent resection of liver metastases from GIST.

METHODS

Patients were included using the national registry of histo- and cytopathology (PALGA) of the Netherlands from 1999. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used for calculating survival outcome. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were carried out for the assessment of potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients (29 male, 19 female) with a median age of 58 (range 28-81) years were identified. Preoperative and postoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy was given to 30 (63%) and 36 (75%) patients, respectively. A minor liver resection was performed in 32 patients, 16 patients underwent major liver resection. Median follow-up was 27 (range 1-146) months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28 (range 1-121) months. One-, three-, and five-year PFS was 93%, 67%, and 59% respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 90 (range 1-146) months from surgery. The one-, three-, and five-year OS was 93%, 80%, and 76% respectively. R0 resection was the only independent significant prognostic factor for DFS and OS at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Resection of liver metastases in GIST patients combined with imatinib may be associated with prolonged overall survival when a complete resection is achieved.

Liver surgery in the multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal stromal tumour

BACKGROUND

After the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the role of surgical resection in treating liver metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is unclear. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of patients treated with TKIs followed by surgery for metastatic GIST.

METHODS

Eleven patients who underwent liver resection after downsizing TKIs therapy for metastatic GIST from 2006 until 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

One and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.8% and 70.7%. All patients with an initially resectable tumour were still alive without recurrence. Patients operated on clinical response had a better outcome (1-year and 2-year OS rate of 100%) than those operated on disease progression (1-year and 2-year OS rates of 60% and 40%; P = 0.043). No deaths were observed among patients who achieved an R0 resection (R0 versus R1/R2, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

R0 resection and clinical response to TKI are predictors of survival. Surgical resection should be performed as soon as feasible in responder patients. In poor responders, surgery may not add any survival benefit, except in localized progressive disease. In resectable metastatic liver disease, preoperative TKIs or upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy could be considered. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimum approach in patients with metastatic GIST.

Survival After Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor and Sarcoma Liver Metastases in 146 Patients

BACKGROUND

We investigated outcomes by primary tumor type in patients who underwent resection of liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), leiomyosarcomas, and other sarcomas.

METHOD

Our institutional liver database was used to identify patients who underwent resection from 1998 through 2013. Histopathological, clinical, and survival data were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients underwent resection of liver metastases from GIST (n = 49), leiomyosarcomas (n = 47), or other sarcomas (n = 50). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients with GIST, leiomyosarcomas, and other sarcomas were 55.3, 48.4, and 44.9%, respectively, and the 10-year OS rates were 52.5, 9.2, and 23.0%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was better for GIST (35.7%; p = 0.003) than for leiomyosarcomas (3.4%) and other sarcomas (21.4%). Lung recurrence was more common for leiomyosarcomas (36% of patients; p < 0.0001) than for other sarcomas (12%) and GIST (2%). For GIST, the findings support a benefit of imatinib regarding the 5-year RFS rate compared to resection alone (47.1 vs. 9.5%; p = 0.013). For leiomyosarcoma, primary tumor location did not affect the 5-year RFS rate (intraabdominal 14.5%; other location 0%; p = 0.182).

CONCLUSION

Liver metastases from GIST, leiomyosarcomas, and other sarcomas should be assessed separately as their survival and recurrence patterns are different. This is especially important for GIST, for which imatinib is now available.

Analysis of long-term survival after hepatectomy for isolated liver metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of liver metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), the role of hepatectomy is controversial. This study tried to identify such role by investigating the immediate and long-term surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent hepatectomy to treat their metastatic disease were reviewed. Patients whose liver tumours were confirmed to be metastatic GISTs were included for analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics of the primary disease, time of metastasis development and modes of treatment were recorded. Immediate outcome and long-term survival after hepatectomy were analysed.

RESULTS

Ten patients were confirmed to have isolated liver metastasis of GIST. Their median age was 61 (42-74) years. All of them had normal liver function and no cirrhosis. Seven patients received major hepatectomy and three patients received minor hepatectomy. The median operation time was 319.5 (122-735) min. The median tumor size was 5.5 (1.5-15) cm. No hospital death occurred. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 100, 75 and 50%, respectively and the corresponding disease-free survival rates were 70, 42 and 14%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Treating isolated liver metastasis of GIST with hepatectomy is effective and safe. Favourable long-term overall survival and disease-free survival can be achieved.

The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature.

METHODS

Medline, Web of Knowledge, and manual searches were performed using search terms, such as "liver resection" and "primary tumor." Inclusion criteria were year>1990, >five patients, and median survival reported or derived. An expected median survival was calculated from weighted averages of median survivals, and differences were assessed using a permutation test.

RESULTS

A total of 7,857 references were identified. Overall 4,735 abstracts were reviewed; 120 manuscripts evaluated and of these, 73 met the study inclusion criteria. The final population consisted of 3,596 patients with renal (n=234), ovarian (n=119), testicular (n=153), adrenal (n=90), small bowel (n=28), gallbladder (n=21), duodenum (n=38), gastric (n=481), pancreatic (n=55), esophageal (n=23), head and neck (n=15), and lung (n=36) cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (n=106), cholangiocarcinoma (n=13), sarcoma (n=189), and melanoma (n=643). The greatest expected median was 63 months for genitourinary (GU) primaries (n=549; range 5.4-142 months) followed by 44.4 months for breast cancer (n=1,013; range 8-74 months), 22.3 months for gastrointestinal cancer (n=549; range 5-58 months), and 23.7 months for other tumor types (n=1,082; range 10-72 months). Using a permutation test, we observed that survival was best for patients with GU primaries followed by that for breast cancer patients. Additionally, we also observed that survival was similar for those with cancer of the GI tract and other primary sites.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a benefit to resection for patients with NCRNNE liver metastases. The degree of survival advantage is predicated by primary site.

Is there a role of surgery in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours responding to imatinib: a prospective randomised trial in China

OBJECTIVES

For advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients who are responding to imatinib mesylate, the role of surgery has not been formally demonstrated. This multicenter randomised controlled trial was designed to assess whether surgery to treat residual disease for patients with recurrent/metastatic GISTs responding to imatinib mesylate (IM) improved progression free survival (PFS) compared with IM treatment alone.

METHODS

Between 3 and 12months after starting IM for recurrent/metastatic GISTs, eligible patients were randomised to two arms: Arm A (surgery for residual disease) and Arm B (IM treatment alone). In Arm A (19pts), surgery was performed to remove residual macroscopic lesions as completely as possible, and IM treatment continued after surgery. In Arm B (22pts), IM was given alone at a dose of 400mg per day until disease progression. The primary end-point was PFS measured from the date IM started. This study was registered in the ChiCTR registry with the ID number ChiCTR-TRC-00000244.

RESULTS

This randomised trial was closed early due to poor accrual. Only 41 patients were enrolled as opposed to 210 patients planned. 2-year PFS was 88.4% in the surgery arm and 57.7% in the IM-alone arm (P=0.089). Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached in the surgery arm and 49months in patients with IM-alone arm (P=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

While no significant differences were observed in the two arms, this study suggests that surgical removal of the metastatic lesion may improve the outcome of advanced GIST patients and should stimulate additional research on this topic.

A large esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor that was successfully resected after neoadjuvant imatinib treatment: case report

A 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with a 1-month history of dysphagia. An upper endoscopy revealed a lower esophageal submucosal tumor. Immunohistochemical staining of the biopsy specimen revealed KIT positivity. Thus, the tumor was diagnosed as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). After 6 months of imatinib treatment, the tumor decreased from 92 mm × 55 mm × 80 mm to 65 mm × 35 mm × 55 mm in diameter, and surgery was performed. The tumor was completely resected without rupture, by partial esophagogastric resection through a thoracotomy incision, using an abdominal laparoscopic approach. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the tumor was negative for c-kit but positive for CD34. Genetic examination showed that the tumor had a mutation in exon 11. The patient experienced minor leakage but recovered conservatively. Adjuvant imatinib was initiated 64 days after surgery. We report this rare case to show the potential of preoperative imatinib treatment in patients with large esophageal GISTs, to achieve complete resection without rupture.

Metastasectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the intestinal tract. Improvements in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of GIST have resulted in novel treatment strategies combining surgery with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Metastasectomy in carefully selected patients who have stable or responsive disease on imatinib should be considered in the multidisciplinary setting. We review existing data on surgical cytoreduction in metastatic GIST while on targeted therapy and compare outcomes with either treatment alone.

A comparison between patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours diagnosed with isolated liver metastases and liver metastases plus sarcomatosis

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to compare overall survival (OS) in patients presenting with isolated hepatic metastases with that of patients with synchronous metastatic disease to the liver and sarcomatosis on a background of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

METHODS

Patients presenting with metastatic GISTs during 1999-2009 were identified. Survival outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 193 patients with GISTs, 43 patients presented with isolated hepatic metastases and 16 presented with synchronous metastases to the liver and sarcomatosis. Thirteen patients with metastases to the liver and sarcomatosis underwent surgery, and 34 patients with metastatic disease solely to the liver underwent hepatic resection. The proportion of patients treated with preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was similar in both groups. Similar OS was observed in both groups (isolated liver metastases group: 40.5 months; liver metastases and sarcomatosis group: 28.7 months; P = 0.620).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival in patients with GIST and metastatic disease to the liver and sarcomatosis is similar to that in patients with isolated metastatic liver disease. Although patients with a greater disease burden might be expected to show worse survival, these data do not reflect this assumption.

Liver surgery in the multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal stromal tumour

INTRODUCTION

After the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the role of surgical resection in treating liver metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is unclear. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of patients treated with TKIs followed by surgery for metastatic GIST.

METHODS

Eleven patients underwent liver resection after downsizing TKIs therapy for metastatic GIST from 2006 until 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

One and two-year overall survival rates were 80.8 and 70.7%. All patients with an initially resectable tumour were still alive without recurrence. Patients operated on clinical response had a better outcome (1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rate 100%) than those operated on disease progression (1- and 2-year OS rates 60 and 40%; P = 0.043). No deaths were observed among patients who achieved an R0 resection (R0 versus R1/R2, P = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

R0 resection and clinical response to TKI are predictor of survival. Surgical resection should be performed as soon as feasible in responding patients. In poor responders, surgery may not add any survival benefit, except in localized progressive disease. In resectable metastatic liver disease, preoperative TKIs or upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy could be considered. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimum approach in patients with metastatic GIST.

Hepatic resection for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era

BACKGROUND

Before the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), surgical resection was the primary treatment for hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) metastases. Although TKIs have improved survival in the metastatic setting, outcomes after multimodal therapy comprised of hepatectomy and TKIs for GIST are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether combination therapy for hepatic GIST metastases is associated with improved overall survival compared with reported outcomes from surgery or TKI therapy alone.

METHODS

Demographics, clinicopathologic tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients who underwent hepatic resection at 3 high-volume centers from 1995 to 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients underwent hepatectomy for metastatic GISTs, and 27 patients received postoperative TKI therapy. At a median follow-up of 39.7 months, 23 patients (59%) experienced recurrence at a median of 18 months. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates were 96.7%, 76.8%, and 67.9%, respectively. Median survival was not reached at 5 years. The rates of severe complication and mortality were 10.2% (4 patients) and 2.5% (1 patient), respectively. When controlling for confounders, postoperative TKI therapy was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.50; P = .006), and extrahepatic disease was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio, 9.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-55.7; P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival after combination therapy exceeded previous reports for the treatment of metastatic GIST with hepatic resection or TKI therapy alone and was significantly enhanced by postoperative TKI therapy. The results from this study support findings that combination therapy for GIST liver metastases comprised of surgical resection and TKI therapy is more effective than surgery or TKI therapy alone.

Safe laparoscopic resection of a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor close to the esophagogastric junction

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is commonly performed for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Partial gastrectomy is usually achieved with a wedge resection to preserve gastric function; however, performing a wedge resection to excise a large tumor located close to the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) can result in deformation of the stomach and/or the stenosis of the EGJ if the gastric wall resection is excessive. We describe our procedure, in which the whole layer of the gastric wall was cut, maintaining a sufficient margin and confirming the distance between the tumor and the EGJ, by endoscopy and laparoscopy. The defect in the gastric wall was closed using linear staplers by hanging up the stay sutures. Five patients with GIST close to EGJ underwent this procedure, followed by a good postoperative course. Thus, we consider our procedure to be safe and effective for gastric GISTs close to the EGJ.