Benefit of extended radical surgery for incidental gallbladder carcinoma

Comparative analyses between radically re-resected incidental gallbladder carcinoma and primary radically resected gallbladder carcinoma: a single-center experience in China

PURPOSES

The current study was performed to comparatively evaluate the similarities and differences between cases with radically re-resected incidental gallbladder carcinoma (RRIGBC) and those with primary radically resected gallbladder carcinoma (PRGBC).

METHODS

Comparative analysis between patients with RRIGBC and those with PRGBC were performed in terms of clinic-pathological features and long-terms survival.

RESULTS

A total of 330 surgically treated GBC patients with 110 patients with IGBC were identified. PRGBCs were generally in a more advanced tumor stage, sharing more aggressive tumor biological features and worse prognosis than those with RRIGBC. Subgroup analyses indicated a comparable prognosis among T1-2 patients between RRIGBC and PRGBC groups. However, among T3-4 patients, patients in the PRGBC group shared a much worse prognosis. Moreover, IGBC itself can be regarded as a prognostic factor but cannot be regarded as an independent prognostic factor. It is the tumor stage which really determined the overall prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RRIGBC were generally in a much earlier tumor stage and shared a much better prognosis than those with PRGBC. IGBC itself can be regarded as a prognostic factor but cannot be regarded as the independent prognostic factors. It is the tumor stage which really determine the overall prognosis.

Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Although guidelines recommend extended cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the optimal hepatectomy strategy remains controversial. The study aims to compare the prognosis of T2 GBC patients who underwent wedge resection (WR) versus segment IVb and V resection (SR) of the liver.

Methods

A specific search of online databases was performed from May 2001 to February 2023. The postoperative efficacy outcomes were synthesized and meta-analyses were conducted.

Results

A total of 9 studies involving 2,086 (SR = 627, WR = 1,459) patients were included in the study. The primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For DFS, the 1-year DFS was statistically higher in patients undergoing SR than WR [risk ratio (RR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.13, P = 0.007]. The 3-year DFS (P = 0.95), 5-year DFS (P = 0.77), and hazard ratio (HR) of DFS (P = 0.72) were similar between the two groups. However, the 3-year OS was significantly lower in patients who underwent SR than WR [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, P = 0.03]. Moreover, SR had a higher hazard HR of OS [HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.01-1.75, P = 0.04]. No significant difference was found in 1-year (P = 0.32) and 5-year (P = 0.9) OS. For secondary outcomes, patients who received SR tended to develop postoperative complications (POC) [RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.00-3.60, P = 0.05]. In addition, no significant differences in intrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.12) were observed.

Conclusions

In conclusion, SR can improve the prognosis of T2 GBC patients in DFS. In contrast to WR, the high HR and complications associated with SR cannot be neglected. Therefore, surgeons should evaluate the condition of the patients and take their surgical skills into account when selecting SR.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42022362974.

Reappraisal of T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC): clinicopathologic analysis of 473 in situ and invasive GBCs and critical review of the literature highlights its rarity, and that it has a very good prognosis

There are highly conflicting data on relative frequency (2-32%), prognosis, and management of pT1b-gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), with 5-year survival ranging from > 90% in East/Chile where cholecystectomy is regarded as curative, versus < 50% in the West, with radical operations post-cholecystectomy being recommended by guidelines. A total of 473 in situ and invasive extensively sampled GBCs from the USA (n = 225) and Chile (n = 248) were re-evaluated histopathologically per Western invasiveness criteria. 349 had invasive carcinoma, and only 24 were pT1. Seven cases previously staged as pT1b were re-classified as pT2. There were 19 cases (5% of all invasive GBCs) qualified as pT1b and most pT1b carcinomas were minute (< 1mm). One patient with extensive pTis at margins (but pT1b focus away from the margins) died of GBC at 27 months, two died of other causes, and the remainder were alive without disease (median follow-up 69.9 months; 5-year disease-specific survival, 92%). In conclusion, careful pathologic analysis of well-sampled cases reveals that only 5% of invasive GBCs are pT1b, with a 5-year disease-specific survival of > 90%, similar to findings in the East. This supports the inclusion of pT1b in the "early GBC" category, as is typically done in high-incidence regions. Pathologic mis-staging of pT2 as pT1 is not uncommon. Cases should not be classified as pT1b unless extensive, preferably total, sampling of the gallbladder to rule out a subtle pT2 is performed. Critical appraisal of the literature reveals that the Western guidelines are based on either SEER or mis-interpretation of stage IB cases as "pT1b." Although the prognosis of pT1b-GBC is very good, additional surgery (radical cholecystectomy) may be indicated, and long-term surveillance of the biliary tract is warranted.

Intracholecystic papillary neoplasm associated with invasive carcinoma of the remnant gallbladder after subtotal cholecystectomy: a case report

Background

Intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (ICPN) of the gallbladder is a rare tumor and a relatively new concept. Therefore, the natural history and imaging characteristics of ICPN have not yet been fully documented. Moreover, cases who underwent curative resection for remnant gallbladder cancer, including ICPN with associated invasive carcinoma, have been rarely reported. We report a resected case of ICPN of the remnant gallbladder with associated invasive carcinoma for which we could observe a temporal change in imaging findings until malignant transformation.

Case presentation

A 79-year-old female patient with a surgical history of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was an ambulatory patient of our institution because of postoperative surveillance for colon cancer. Ultrasonography and computed tomography incidentally detected a small nodule in the cystic remnant gallbladder. The nodule had increased in size 3 months later; thus, additional investigations were performed. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 10-mm enhanced nodule without evidence of extraluminal invasion. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed restricted diffusion of the lesion, and positron emission tomography revealed marked accumulation in the lesion. The lesion was diagnosed as suspicious for a malignant remnant gallbladder tumor. Therefore, remnant cholecystectomy with gallbladder bed resection was performed. Because preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography revealed a relatively long intact cystic duct, extrahepatic bile duct resection was planned to be omitted. Intraoperatively, the hepatic and duodenal side bile duct where the cystic duct diverged was taped. Using these tapes, which permitted pulling the bile duct, the cystic duct located behind the bile duct could be safely exposed. The lesion was pathologically diagnosed as biliary morphologic ICPN with associated invasive carcinoma.

Conclusions

Because remnant cholecystectomy is an uncommon procedure and technically difficult, accurate preoperative investigation and surgical planning are important to prevent bile duct injury and omit extrahepatic bile duct resection. In the present case, intracystic change could be detected incidentally at an early stage because of previous remnant gallbladder producing (reconstituting) subtotal cholecystectomy and surveillance for other disease. This case suggests the existence of ICPN that can progress to invasive carcinoma during a short period.

Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are rare tumours with a rising incidence. Prognosis is poor, since most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Only ~20% of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, suitable for curative surgery. Despite surgery performed with potentially-curative intent, relapse rates are high, with around 60-70% of patients expected to have disease recurrence. Most relapses occur in the form of distant metastases, with a predominance of liver spread. In view of high tumour recurrence, adjuvant strategies have been explored for many years, in the form of radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Historically, few randomised trials were available, which included a variety of additional tumours (e.g. pancreatic and ampullary tumours); most evidence relied on phase II and retrospective studies, with no high-quality evidence available to define the real benefit derived from adjuvant strategies. Since 2017, three randomised phase III clinical trials have been reported; all recruited patients with resected biliary tract cancer (CCA and GBC) who were randomised to observation alone, or chemotherapy in the form of gemcitabine (BCAT study; included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic CCA only), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC) or capecitabine (BILCAP; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC). While gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed to show an impact on patient outcome (relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)), the BILCAP study showed a benefit from adjuvant capecitabine in terms of OS (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis), with confirmed benefit in terms of RFS. Based on the BILCAP trial, international guidelines recommend adjuvant capecitabine for a period of six months following potentially curative resection of CCA as the current standard of care for resected CCA and GBC. However, BILCAP failed to show OS benefit in the intention-to-treat (non-sensitivity analysis) population (primary end-point), and this finding, as well as some inconsistencies between studies has been criticised and has led to confusion in the biliary tract cancer medical community. This review summarises the adjuvant field in biliary tract cancer, with evidence before and after 2017, and comparison between the latest randomised phase III studies. Potential explanations are presented for differential findings, and future steps are explored.

Incidental gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence, management, and prognosis

Aims

Although incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) diagnosed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is not rare, its incidence, management, and prognosis are still unclear and controversial. The present study aimed to increase the understanding of IGBC after LC in the medical community.

Methods

Patients with IGBC treated at our institution between January 2001 and December 2018 were enrolled. Data collected included demographic characteristics, treatment pattern, pathological information, and prognoses. We compared the characteristics of patients with different prognoses and calculated the cumulative overall survival rate and mean survival period for IGBC.

Results

The cohort comprised 26 patients with a mean age of 66.4 ± 12.5 years. All patients were diagnosed with IGBC via postoperative pathology. Three patients underwent radical reoperation. As of June 2019, 26 patients were followed for a mean of 31.6 ± 29.6 months. Fourteen patients died during the follow‐up period, and 12 survived without recurrence. The mean survival duration was 50.5 months. The 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year cumulative overall survival rates of the entire cohort were 79.8, 49.0, and 40.8%, respectively. IGBC patients with T1a stage had significantly longer survival than those with T1b or more advanced stages (96.1 vs 32.6 months, P = .006).

Conclusions

IGBC after LC is diagnosed in 0.2% of patients, accounting for 5.4% of all gallbladder cancer cases. IGBC patients with T1a stage had significantly longer survival than those with T1b or more advanced stages. Simple cholecystectomy is probably acceptable only in T1a lesions.

Indication of extrahepatic bile duct resection for gallbladder cancer

PURPOSE

Extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) resection is performed as part of radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder (GB) cancer. However, the indication for EHBD resection is still controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of this procedure.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection for GB cancer with curative intent were enrolled. We divided GB cancer into two categories based on the tumor location: proximal-type and distal-type tumors. The former refers to tumors involving the neck or cystic duct, while the latter comprises tumors located between the body and fundus.

RESULTS

This study included 80 patients, 40 each with proximal- and distal-type tumors. Proximal tumor location, lymph node metastasis, and a serum carcinoembryonic antigen level > 5.0 ng/mL were independent predictors of poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rates of patients with proximal-type and distal-type tumors were 33.3 and 73.5%, respectively. Patients with proximal-type tumors showed significantly lower rates of R0 resection, more frequently had ≥ 3 metastatic lymph nodes, and exhibited a higher rate of perineural invasion. EHBD resection improved prognoses only in patients with proximal-type tumors but not in those with distal-type tumors. In the former group, EHBD resection significantly reduced the rate of local or regional lymph node recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended cholecystectomy with EHBD resection should be performed for patients with GB cancer involving the neck and cystic duct to reduce local and regional lymph node recurrence and achieve better prognosis.