A comparison of the clinical outcomes of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophagectomy Versus Endoscopic Resection with Adjuvant Therapy for T1b/T2 Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide [...].

Comparison of outcomes between surgery and chemoradiotherapy after endoscopic resection for pT1a-MM with lymphovascular invasion or pT1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japanese multicenter propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or pT1b is noncurative after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and therefore surgery or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is recommended. However, there has been debate regarding which treatment has better outcomes and whether individual risks should be considered.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study conducted at 65 hospitals in Japan. The inclusion criteria were patients with ESCC who underwent ER between January 2006 and December 2015, with pT1a-muscularis mucosa (MM) with LVI or pT1b, with negative vertical margins, cN0M0, and who underwent surgery or CRT. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed between two groups. The primary and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). OS and RFS were also compared between two subgroups: low risk (pT1a-MM with LVI and pT1b without LVI) and high risk (pT1b with LVI) for metastatic recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 472 patients, 160 patients were selected from each group. The OS and RFS did not differ between surgery and CRT groups (hazard ratio, 0.887; P = .635 and hazard ratio, 1.036; P = .876, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that CRT had a better prognosis in the low-risk group, and conversely, surgery had a better prognosis in the high-risk group. But these were not significant. The high-risk CRT group had a significant worse prognosis than the low-risk CRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with noncurative ER for ESCC, surgery and CRT showed no difference in long-term outcomes. Indications for CRT in the high-risk group need further investigation because of poor prognosis.

Definitive-dose adjuvant radiotherapy following endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic chemoradiation therapy (CRT) using 40-41.4 Gy post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for clinical T1N0M0 esophageal cancer reportedly yields favorable outcomes. However, it cannot completely prevent locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes and adverse events associated with our dose-escalated treatment regimen (definitive-dose radiotherapy [RT] of 50-61.2 Gy, with/without chemotherapy) for these patients, and predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2018, 44 consecutive patients (42 men and 2 women; median age, 70 years) who underwent definitive-dose RT post-ESD and had a pathological depth of the muscularis mucosa with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or the upper-middle submucosal third at our institution were included. We excluded patients who could not obtain a margin-free resection by ESD. If feasible, systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus high- or low-dose cisplatin or nedaplatin was administered concurrently.

RESULTS

Five-year PFS, OS, and disease-specific survival rates were 78.8%, 88.4%, and 97.7%, respectively. Six metachronous esophagus (14%), two locoregional LN within the irradiated area with a prophylactic dose of 41.4 Gy (5%), and two locoregional LN plus liver (5%) recurrences occurred. No LN recurrence occurred within the definitive dose of ≥ 50 Gy in the irradiated area. Metachronous esophageal recurrence involved areas receiving ≥ 50 Gy. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that age was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive-dose RT/CRT post-ESD could provide favorable locoregional LN control and PFS/OS regardless of patient characteristics, including pathological findings and chemotherapy regimen/course, except for age. These results need to be interpreted carefully given several limitations, therefore, definitive-dose RT/CRT should be conducted with caution in clinical practice until high-quality prospective clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness and safety.

Position statement of the World Endoscopy Organization: Role of endoscopy in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of esophageal superficial squamous neoplasia

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a significant global health challenge, being the sixth leading cause of cancer mortality with pronounced geographic variability. The incidence rates range from 125 per 100,000 in northern China to 1-1.5 per 100,000 in the United States, driven by environmental and lifestyle factors such as tobacco and alcohol use, dietary habits, and pollution. Major modifiable risk factors include tobacco and alcohol consumption, with a synergistic risk increase when combined. Nonmodifiable risk factors include previous diagnoses of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (H&N SCC), achalasia, and prior radiotherapy. Prevention strategies must be tailored to specific regional burdens to efficiently allocate medical and financial resources. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is crucial in reducing ESCC burden through early detection and characterization of neoplastic changes, such as high-grade dysplasia. Early diagnosis significantly improves survival rates, while endoscopic resection of noninvasive dysplasia can prevent ESCC onset, reducing treatment burden for advanced disease. Postresection surveillance can detect high-risk metachronous lesions. Despite these benefits, endoscopic prevention faces challenges, including the lack of high-level evidence supporting its efficacy, opportunity costs, the need for specialized training and techniques, and the requirement for advanced technology investments. This Position Statement from the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) aims to address these challenges, supplying recommendations for the exploitation of endoscopic resources regarding the possible role of screening, quality, and training for the detection, characterization, resection, and surveillance of ESCC.

Risk factors and pattern of metastatic recurrence after endoscopic resection with additional treatment for esophageal cancer

Although esophageal cancers invading the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (pT1b-SM) after endoscopic resection (ER) are associated with a risk of lymph node metastasis, details of metastatic recurrence after additional treatment remain unknown. We aimed to identify the risk factors for metastatic recurrence and recurrence patterns in patients receiving additional treatment after ER for esophageal cancer. Between 2006 and 2017, patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer who underwent ER with additional treatment (esophagectomy, chemoradiotherapy [CRT], and radiation therapy) at 21 institutions in Japan were enrolled. We evaluated the risk factors for metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment. Subsequently, the rate and pattern (locoregional or distant) of metastatic recurrence were investigated for each additional treatment. Of the 220 patients who received additional treatment, 57, 125, and 38 underwent esophagectomy, CRT, and radiation therapy, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, lymphatic invasion was the sole risk factor for metastatic recurrence after additional treatment (hazard ratio, 3.50; P = 0.029). Although the risk of metastatic recurrence with additional esophagectomy was similar to that with CRT (hazard ratio, 1.01; P = 0.986), the rate of locoregional recurrence tended to be higher with additional esophagectomy (80.0% (4/5) vs. 36.4% (4/11)), leading to a better prognosis in patients with metastatic recurrence after additional esophagectomy than CRT (survival rate, 80.0% (4/5) vs. 9.1% (1/11)). Patients with lymphatic invasion have a high risk of metastatic recurrence after ER with additional treatment for pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM esophageal cancer. Additional esophagectomy may result in a better prognosis after metastatic recurrence.

Radical chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer complicated with liver cirrhosis

Background

Although chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for esophageal cancer, its feasibility in esophageal cancer with cirrhosis remains largely unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 11 patients with superficial esophageal cancer with liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score ≤8) who underwent radical chemoradiotherapy from four centers, and the overall survival rate, local control rate and adverse events at 1 and 3 years were explored.

Results

The median age of the included patients was 67 years (Inter-Quartile Range 60-75 years). Complete response was observed in most patients (n = 10, 90.9%), and the remaining patient was unevaluable. The 1- and 3-year overall survival and local control rates were 90.9% and 90.9%, and 72.7% and 63.6%, respectively. Hematotoxicity was a common adverse reaction, and seven patients developed radiation esophagitis, with grade 3-4 observed in two cases. All cases of radiation dermatitis (n = 4) and radiation pneumonia (n = 2) were grade 1-2. Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in two patients, including one with grade 1-2 bleeding, and one died.

Conclusion

Radical chemoradiotherapy is a potential treatment option for patients with superficial esophageal cancer complicated with cirrhosis. However, it can increase the risk of bleeding, which warrants prompt recognition and intervention.

Treatment strategy for early-stage esophageal cancer

Approximately 90% of esophageal cancers in Japan are squamous cell carcinomas, and they are often detected at earlier stages in Japan than in Western countries; superficial esophageal cancer without lymph node or distant metastasis comprises one-third of all esophageal cancers in Japan. Endoscopic resection is a minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal cancer; however, the risk of regional lymph node recurrence is negligible when it invades the submucosal layer or lymphovasculature. In such cases, surgical treatment is necessary to control regional lymph node recurrences, although the physical burdens and potential complications cannot be overlooked. Recently, clinical trials in Japan have shown promising clinical outcomes of organ preservation strategies. One strategy is initially performing endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal cancer, assessing the risk of lymph node metastasis based on pathological diagnosis for endoscopically resected specimens, and subsequently considering additional therapy (e.g., observation or prophylactic chemoradiotherapy)-another strategy aimed to cure superficial esophageal cancer through definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. The safety and efficacy of the two strategies have been evaluated in clinical trials, which showed that both organ preservation strategies are comparable to surgery in terms of overall survival. However, challenges include improving the accuracy of pretreatment endoscopic diagnosis and decreasing the local-regional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. This review provides an overview of the latest standard treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer and its future perspectives.

Long-term outcomes after non-curative endoscopic resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma followed by additional chemoradiotherapy

Endoscopic resection (ER) of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is evaluated pathologically, and additional treatment is recommended for cases resulting in non-curative resection, defined as pMM with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), pSM, or positive vertical margin. This study aimed to assess long-term outcomes and risk factors for recurrence in patients with ESCC treated with non-curative ER followed by additional chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of patients who underwent non-curative ER followed by additional CRT for ESCCs between August 2007 and December 2017. Recurrence rates and risk factors for recurrence were analyzed. Among 97 patients with non-curative ER, 73 underwent additional CRT. With a median follow-up period of 71 months, recurrences were observed in 10 (14%) of 73 patients, with a median interval of 24.5 (1-59 months). The 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival were 89 and 85%, respectively, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 96 and 91%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that lymphatic invasion was an independent risk factor for recurrence in patients with non-curative ESCC receiving additional CRT. Among the 10 patients with recurrence, 4, 3, 2, and 1 underwent surgery, chemotherapy, supportive care, and CRT, respectively. Notably, all four patients who underwent surgery survived, regardless of regional and/or distant lymph node metastasis. Lymphatic invasion is an independent risk factor for the recurrence of non-curative ESCCs. Careful follow-up is required for at least 5 years after ER with additional CRT.

A retrospective cohort study to observe the efficacy and safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) with adjuvant radiotherapy for T1a-MM/T1b-SM Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The clinical outcome of endoscopy submucosal dissection with subsequent radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remain unclear. In this study we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection with adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma involving the muscularis mucosae (T1a-MM) or the submucosa < 200 μm (T1b-SM1).

METHODS

We analyzed 20 patients with pathologically confirmed T1a-MM or T1b-SM1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection from 2016 to 2020 in Lihuili Hospital, 9 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT group) and 11 patients received did not (non-RT group).

RESULTS

All 20 patients underwent en bloc resection, and both the vertical and horizontal margins were negative. There was no recurrence or lymph node metastasis in the RT group, and no serious complications or death were observed. In the non-RT group, 2 patients had local recurrence and 1 had distant metastasis. None of the 20 patients died of esophageal carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant radiotherapy following endoscopic submucosal dissection may be a safe and effective method for the treatment of T1a-MM/T1b-SM1 superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Long-term survival in esophagectomy for early-stage esophageal cancer versus endoscopic resection plus additional chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Esophagectomy is still advised as an additional treatment for patients with superficial esophageal cancer (EC, T1a-T1b) after endoscopic resection (ER). However, esophagectomy often deteriorates the general condition of EC patients. In recent years, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been recognized as a reliable, non-surgical treatment that can improve the prognosis. How to combine ER with adjuvant therapy to bring maximal benefits to patients has become a hot clinical research hot topic. However, the current studies have mostly been conducted retrospectively, in single centers, and with small clinical samples; there have been few prospective and large sample size randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of adjuvant CRT versus esophagectomy in the treatment of early EC, and to provide a reference for clinical research and practice.

Methods

A comprehensive and extensive literature search was performed via the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science online and all randomized cohort studies and retrospective cohort studies were collected. The quality of research was evaluated according to Cochrane's quality standards, and statistical analysis was conducted with Stata 13.0 and RevMan 5.3 software and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Results

A total of 9 cohort studies, including 790 patients, were included for meta-analysis. The long term effects of the esophagectomy group were better than those of the CRT after ER group [odds ratio (OR) =6.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.96 to 18.84, P=0.002] in disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR) =0.24, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.85, P=0.03] and overall survival (OS) (HR =1.02, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.82, P=0.94). Other survival indicators showed no significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The 2 groups showed no significant results in OS. Although we found that CRT may be suitable for patients with high-risk of relapse or unable to tolerate surgery, it cannot totally replace surgical treatment; further randomized trials are required to verify this view.

Curative Management After Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invading Muscularis Mucosa or Shallow Submucosal Layer-Multicenter Real-World Survey in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Curative management after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which invades the muscularis mucosa (pMM-ESCC) or shallow submucosal layer (pSM1-ESCC), has been controversial.

METHODS

We identified patients with pMM-ESCC and pSM1-ESCC treated by ER. Outcomes were the predictive factors for regional lymph node and distant recurrence, and survival data were based on the depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and additional treatment immediately after ER.

RESULTS

A total of 992 patients with pMM-ESCC (n = 749) and pSM1-ESCC (n = 243) were registered. According to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, pSM1-ESCC (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.07, P = 0.012) and LVI (hazard ratio = 6.92, 95% confidence interval 4.09-11.7, P < 0.0001) were associated with a risk of regional lymph node and distant recurrence. In the median follow-up period of 58.6 months (range 1-233), among patients with risk factors (pMM-ESCC with LVI or pSM1-ESCC), the 5-year overall survival rates, relapse-free survival rates, and cause-specific survival rates of patients with additional treatment were significantly better than those of patients without additional treatment; 85.4% vs 61.5% ( P < 0.0001), 80.5% vs 53.3% ( P < 0.0001), and 98.5% vs 93.1% ( P = 0.004), respectively. There was no difference in survival rate between the chemoradiotherapy and surgery groups.

DISCUSSION

pSM1 and LVI were risk factors for metastasis after ER for ESCC. To improve the survival, additional treatment immediately after ER, such as chemoradiotherapy or surgery, is effective in patients with these risk factors.

Long‑term prognosis and comprehensive endoscopic treatment strategy for esophageal cancer, including salvage endoscopic treatment after chemoradiation therapy

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the first treatment option for superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SSCE). Salvage endoscopic treatment for recurrent advanced esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been reported. However, there are few reports on long-term prognosis after salvage endoscopic treatment in Japan. The present study investigated long-term treatment results after conventional ESD for SSCE and after salvage endoscopic treatment for locally recurrent lesions after CRT. Outcomes of esophageal ESD were retrospectively investigated at Nagasaki University Hospital and long-term prognosis after salvage endoscopic treatment for locally recurrence lesions after CRT was examined. The en-bloc curative resection rate was 89.5% (606/676) for conventional ESD. The 5-year cause-specific survival rate (CSS) was 98.5%. A total of 77 patients underwent salvage endoscopic treatment [ESD or photodynamic therapy (PDT)] for locally recurrent lesions after CRT. The 3-year CSS was 81.3 and 77.1% for salvage ESD and salvage PDT, respectively. SSCE management using ESD yielded high en-bloc curative resection and survival rates. Overall, establishing salvage endoscopic treatment made long-term control of the underlying disease possible, while also maintaining the quality of life for patients with recurrent advanced esophageal cancer deeper than patients with T1b who underwent CRT and patients with recurrence after additional CRT following ESD.

The efficacy of additional surgical resection after endoscopic resection in pT1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

pT1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated by endoscopic resection (ER) required additional treatment with surgical resection (SR) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) according to 2020 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) guideline. Given the evidences for this recommendation were largely based on small-size studies, our study collected 166 cases of ER-treated pT1b patients in order to investigate the efficacy of additional SR as compared to ER-alone treatment.

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective study in China was conducted. The pT1b ESCC treated by ER + SR (n = 42) and ER-alone (n = 124) from 2007 to 2018 were recruited. Meanwhile, patients with positive lymphovascular invasion (LVI(+)) and/or with positive vertical margin (VM(+)) were put into high-risk group, and those with both VM(-) and LVI(-) were selected into low-risk group. The clinicopathological parameters, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and survival between ER + SR and ER-alone groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

In high-risk group, concurrent LNM revealed in surgically resected specimens accounted for 52.6% cases in ER + SR group. After surgical removal, the incidence of post-resection LNM dropped down to 5.6%. However, in low-risk group, patients with ER + SR treatment did not exhibit any concurrent LNM in surgically resected specimens, and the incidence of their overall LNM was similar to that in ER-alone group (0% vs. 2.8%, p = 1.000). More importantly, these cases demonstrated significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than that in ER-alone group (81.8% and 100.0%, respectively, at 3 years; log-Rank: P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

For ER-treated pT1b patients in high-risk group, additional SR is strongly recommended. However, for those in low-risk group, additional SR does not generate much benefit for clearance of LNM, but brings harm to shorten their OS. Therefore, additional SR is not recommended for ER-treated pT1b patient in low-risk group.

Chemoradiation versus surgery for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is the standard adjuvant treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) following noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, recent reports have also shown that ESD with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has promising results. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the efficacy of CRT compared to surgery in patients with SESCC after noncurative ESD.

METHODS

This study retrospectively compared the long-term outcomes of patients who received adjuvant treatment with surgery or CRT after noncurative ESD for SESCC.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 60 patients who developed SESCC after noncurative ESD, 34 of whom received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and 26 underwent esophagectomy. The median follow-up periods were 46 and 56 months in the CRT and esophagectomy groups, respectively. The median patient age was significantly higher in the CRT group than in the esophagectomy group (69 vs. 65 years, p = 0.0054). CRT was completed in all patients, and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic adverse events was 6%. The overall and disease-free survival did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT following ESD seems a promising nonsurgical strategy for optimizing the selection of therapies for high-risk SESCC and warrant further investigation.

Management of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Early Gastric Cancer following Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection

According to the European and Japanese guidelines, additional treatment is recommended for cases of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and early gastric cancer (EGC) that do not meet the curability criteria for endoscopic resection (ER), i.e., non-curative ER, owing to the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, the rates of LNM in such cases were relatively low (e.g., 8% for EGC). Several recent advances have been made in this field. First, pathological risk stratification for metastatic recurrence following non-curative ER without additional treatment was developed for both superficial ESCC and EGC. Second, the pattern of metastatic recurrence and prognosis after recurrence following non-curative ER without additional treatment was found to be considerably different between superficial ESCC and EGC. Third, a combination of ER and selective chemoradiotherapy was developed as a minimally invasive treatment method for clinical T1b-SM ESCC. These findings may help clinicians decide the treatment strategy for patients following non-curative ER; however, for optimal therapeutic decision-making in such patients, it is also important to predict the prognosis other than SESCC or EGC and impaired quality of life. Thus, a novel algorithm that considers these factors, as well as metastatic recurrence, should be developed.

Implementing precision medicine in endoscopy practice

In contrast to the "one-size-fits-all" approach, precision medicine focuses on providing health care tailored to individual variabilities. Implementing precision medicine in endoscopy practice involves selecting the appropriate procedures among the endoscopic armamentarium in the diagnosis and management of patients in a logical sequence, jointly considering the pretest probabilities of possible diagnoses, patients' comorbidities and preference, and risk-benefit ratio of the individual procedures given the clinical scenario. The aim of this review is to summarize evidence-supported strategies and measures that may enhance precision medicine in general endoscopy practice.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022

ESGE recommends that the evaluation of superficial gastrointestinal (GI) lesions should be made by an experienced endoscopist, using high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based).ESGE does not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection.ESGE recommends endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the treatment of choice for most superficial esophageal squamous cell and superficial gastric lesions.For Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated lesions, ESGE suggests the use of ESD for lesions suspicious of submucosal invasion (Paris type 0-Is, 0-IIc), for malignant lesions > 20 mm, and for lesions in scarred/fibrotic areas.ESGE does not recommend routine use of ESD for duodenal or small-bowel lesions.ESGE suggests that ESD should be considered for en bloc resection of colorectal (but particularly rectal) lesions with suspicion of limited submucosal invasion (demarcated depressed area with irregular surface pattern or a large protruding or bulky component, particularly if the lesions are larger than 20 mm) or for lesions that otherwise cannot be completely removed by snare-based techniques.ESGE recommends that an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with histology no more advanced than intramucosal cancer (no more than m2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma), well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion or ulceration, should be considered a very low risk (curative) resection, and no further staging procedure or treatment is generally recommended.ESGE recommends that the following should be considered to be a low risk (curative) resection and no further treatment is generally recommended: an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with superficial submucosal invasion (sm1), that is well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion, of size ≤ 20 mm for an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or ≤ 30 mm for a stomach lesion or of any size for a BE-related or colorectal lesion, and with no lymphovascular invasion, and no budding grade 2 or 3 for colorectal lesions.ESGE recommends that, after an endoscopically complete resection, if there is a positive horizontal margin or if resection is piecemeal, but there is no submucosal invasion and no other high risk criteria are met, this should be considered a local-risk resection and endoscopic surveillance or re-treatment is recommended rather than surgery or other additional treatment.ESGE recommends that when there is a diagnosis of lymphovascular invasion, or deeper infiltration than sm1, or positive vertical margins, or undifferentiated tumor, or, for colorectal lesions, budding grade 2 or 3, this should be considered a high risk (noncurative) resection, and complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments should be considered on an individual basis in a multidisciplinary discussion.ESGE recommends scheduled endoscopic surveillance with high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based) with biopsies of only the suspicious areas after a curative ESD.

Long-term outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with invasion depth of pathological T1a-muscularis mucosae and T1b-submucosa by endoscopic resection followed by appropriate additional treatment

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic resection (ER) is indicated for a wide range of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs). We examined the long-term outcomes in patients with pathological (p) invasion of ESCC into the T1a-muscularis mucosae (MM) and T1b-submucosa (SM) after ER, for which data on prognosis are limited.

METHODS

Of the 1217 patients with superficial ESCC who underwent ER, 225 patients with a pathological diagnosis of ESCC invasion into the MM, minute submucosal invasion ≤200 µm (SM1), or massive submucosal invasion (SM2) were included. In patients with lymphovascular invasion, droplet infiltration, or SM2 invasion, additional treatments, including chemoradiation (CRT) or esophagectomy with two- to three-field lymph node dissection, were recommended. The median observation period was 66 months (interquartile range 48-91 months).

RESULTS

In total, there were 151, 28, and 46 pT1a-MM, pT1b-SM1, and pT1b-SM2 cases, respectively. Metastatic recurrence was observed in 1.3%, 10.7%, and 6.5% patients with pT1a-MM, pT1b-SM1, and pT1b-SM2 ESCCs, respectively. Of the eight patients with metastatic recurrence, six were successfully treated, and two died of ESCC. The 5-year overall survival rates were 84.1%, 71.4%, and 67.4%, the 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 82.8%, 64.3%, and 65.2%, and the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 100%, 96.4%, and 99.1% in patients with pT1a-MM, pT1b-SM1, and pT1b-SM2 ESCCs, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that additional CRT and esophagectomy, and T1b-SM2 were positively and negatively associated with overall survival, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection preceding appropriate additional treatments resulted in favorable outcomes. Many cases of metastatic recurrence in this cohort could be successfully treated.

Best additional management after non-curative endoscopic resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an accepted first-line treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but when curative resection is not achieved, further treatment is not standardised. We aimed at evaluating outcomes of management strategies (esophagectomy, chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (CRT/RT) or follow-up (FUP)) after a non-curative ESCC ER.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed evaluating outcomes of different management strategies after ESCC submitted to primary ER (T1a/T1b), without curative criteria (R1/Rx, T1a-m3/T1b, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or poor differentiation). Primary outcomes included recurrence, overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Secondary outcomes consisted of treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included for qualitative analysis (16 observational and 1 randomized controlled trial) including 788 patients with ESCC submitted to ER, managed by additional CRT/RT (n = 530), surgery (n = 98) or FUP (n = 160). Eight studies suited quantitative analysis. Patients only followed up after ER experienced recurrence rates of 0-36.4% (OR 3.6 (95%CI 1.06-12.20) vs further treatments). When submitted to CRT/RT following non-curative ER, recurrence was observed in 0-27.2% (OR 8.00 (95%CI 1.74-36.80) whereas after surgery no recurrence was noticeable. Reported 5 y-OS after CRT/RT for non-curative ER ranged among 75-100% whereas, for those offered surgeries, 5 y-OS was 89.5%. OS ranged between 54.5% and 100% after FUP. CRT/RT and surgery-related adverse events ranged from 0% to 32% and 14% to 28.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional treatment should be provided in ESCC after non-curative ER. Adjuvant esophagectomy might be the preferred treatment to medically fit patients with high-risk features (namely LVI). Properly designed trials assessing the role of CRT/RT are needed to manage these patients.

Endoscopic resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Current indications and treatment outcomes

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an alternate minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). We aimed to review the clinical indications and treatment outcomes of ER for SESCC. Endoscopic mucosal resection is relatively easy and efficient for SESCC ≤ 15 mm. In contrast, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended to achieve en bloc resection for lesions >15 mm, in view of the accurate pathological evaluation. The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines recommend ER for non-circumferential cT1a-EP/LPM (epithelium/lamina propria mucosae), cT1a-MM/T1b-SM1 (muscularis mucosa/superficial submucosa ≤ 200μm) SESCC, and whole-circumferential T1a-EP/LPM SESCC ≤ 50 mm (upon implementing preventive measures for stenosis), considering the risk-benefit balance of ER. It defines pT1a-EP/LPM without lymphovascular invasion as a curative endoscopic resection. The guidelines recommend additional esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy for pT1b SESCC or any SESCC, with lymphovascular invasion. However, there is no recommendation for or against the administration of additional treatments for pT1a-MM without lymphovascular invasion, owing to limited evidence. Researchers have reported on high en bloc and R0 resection rates of ESD, and a randomized controlled trial demonstrated that clip-line traction-assisted ESD could significantly reduce the ESD procedural time. Moreover, steroid treatment has been developed to prevent post-ESD esophageal strictures. There have been reports on favorable long-term outcomes of ESD. However, most of them are retrospective studies. Further robust data in prospective trials are warranted to achieve a definitive evidence of ESD, which will be beneficial to patients with SESCC.

cT1N0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invades the Muscularis Mucosa or Submucosa: Comparison of the Results of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) combined with selective adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be a new treatment option for cT1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) invading muscularis mucosa or submucosa (pT1a-M3/pT1b). We aim to report the effectiveness of this treatment by comparing the results of esophagectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 72 patients with pT1a-M3/pT1b ESCC who received ESD combined with selective adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 40) and esophagectomy (n = 32). The main outcome comparison was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were treatment-related events, including operation time, complication rate, and length of hospital stay. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the rates of OS, DSS, and PFS between the two groups (median follow-up time: 49.2 months vs. 50.9 months); these were also the same in the subgroup analysis of pT1b ESCC patients. In the ESD group, the procedure time, overall complication rates, and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced. However, the metachronous recurrence rate was significantly higher. In a multivariate analysis, tumor depth and R0 resection were the independent factors associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD combined with selective adjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be an alternative treatment to esophagectomy for cT1N0M0 ESCC invading muscularis mucosa or submucosa.

Long-term clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with pT1a-muscularis mucosae with lymphovascular invasion or pT1b after endoscopic resection for cT1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) is performed for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cases. Additional esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is recommended for non-curative resection (NCR) even with pathologically negative vertical margins (pVM0); however, their clinical outcomes remain unknown. We examined the long-term clinical outcomes of NCR for ESCCs according to additional treatments.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent ER for cT1N0M0 ESCC between 2009 and 2017 judged to have NCR, which defined when pathologically diagnosed as invading the submucosa (SM) or muscularis mucosae (MM) involving lymphovascular invasion (LVI), pVM0, and endoscopically judged as negative horizontal margin. Additional esophagectomy (involving three-field lymphadenectomy), chemoradiotherapy [mainly cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy)], or observation was undertaken. Thereafter, computed tomography was performed every 6-12 months. The cumulative recurrence (CRR) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were included. Among them, 14 had pathologically diagnosed pMM with LVI; 9 and 6, and 32 and 28 patients had pSM1 and pSM2 without and with LVI. Twenty-one patients underwent observation, whereas 18 and 50 underwent esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy. During the 60.6-month median follow-up period, nine patients had recurrence; among them, six patients had occurrence at > 4 years after ER. The 5-year CRR/RFS rates were 35.7%/48.1%, 13.4%/80.4%, and 0.0%/98.0% in the observation, esophagectomy, and chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively (observation vs. chemoradiotherapy; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional treatments showed better long-term outcomes than observation for patients with NCR. As recurrence may occur at > 4 years after ER, careful long-term follow-up examinations are needed.

[Treatment of Superficial Esophageal Cancer: An Update]

Superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma confined to the mucosa or superficial submucosa. Recent Korean Guidelines recommend an endoscopic resection as the first-line treatment for SESCC without a distant or lymph node metastasis (LNM) after excluding those with an obvious submucosal invasion. Before endoscopic treatment of SESCC, Lugol chromoendoscopy or image-enhanced endoscopy is recommended to define the extent of the lesion, and endoscopic ultrasound is recommended to determine the T stage. The tumor size, macroscopic type of tumor, pathologic differentiation, depth of tumor, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) are risk factors of LNM in SESCC. No additional treatment is necessary after an en bloc complete resection of SESCC invading no more than the lamina propria without LVI. Although the risk of LNM in a SESCC invading into muscularis mucosa without LVI is low, a close follow-up is recommended without additional treatment. On the other hand, additional treatment is recommended in the case of a tumor with submucosal invasion or an LVI positive or positive vertical resection margin. Adjuvant therapy includes esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), but it is unclear which treatment is better. The 5-year overall survival rates were reportedly 90-100% for esophagectomy and 75-85% for CRT. Nevertheless, patients with high-risk features including poorly differentiated histology, LVI positive, perineural invasion positive, T1b-SM2/T1b-SM3 cancer, and vertical resection margin positive need to be treated with an additional esophagectomy. Elderly patients, those with a physical condition and co-morbidities, and those with LNM or cancer-specific mortality require additional treatment after a non-curative endoscopic resection of SESCC.

Additional Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy Following Endoscopic Resection for Stage I Esophageal Carcinoma: A Pilot Study

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional radiotherapy after endoscopic resection (ER) for stage I esophageal carcinoma (EC) with high-risk factors. Materials and methods: Patients with stage cT1N0M0 EC who underwent ER and additional radiotherapy between January 2010 and August 2019 at our institution were retrospectively included. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), local control rate, regional control rate, common acute toxicities, esophageal stricture, and dysphagia were analyzed. Results: Thirty-one consecutive patients were included in the study. The median age was 62 years (range, 49-78). Thirty patients (96.8%) had squamous cell carcinoma, and one patient (3.2%) had adenosquamous cell carcinoma. Twenty-six patients (83.9%) had submucosal invasion, 15 patients (48.4%) had lymphovascular invasion, and one patient (3.2%) had a venous invasion. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100.0%, 86.9%, and 68.5%, respectively. The corresponding DFS rates were 100.0%, 85.2%, and 75.8%, respectively. The corresponding CSS rates were 100.0%, 89.8%, and 78.6%, respectively. The local and regional control rates were 100.0% and 93.5%, respectively. No grade 4-5 acute toxicities were observed. Fifteen patients (48.4%) were endoscopically diagnosed with esophageal strictures after ER. At the last follow-up, 28 patients (90.5%) were able to eat a regular diet, one patient (3.2%) could eat a soft diet, one needed a semifluid diet, and only one (3.2%) had to eat a fluid diet. Conclusions: For patients with stage I EC, additional radiotherapy following ER is safe and effective, with the swallowing function well-preserved. Nevertheless, prospective studies are needed to verify these results.

Additional Esophagectomy Following Noncurative Endoscopic Resection for Early Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is recommended after endoscopic resection (ER) for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) when histopathological factors indicate a risk of nodal metastasis and incomplete resection. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of surgery management in this clinical setting and evaluate risk factors for residual disease after ER.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of cT1N0M0 ESCC patients with noncurative ER and additional esophagectomy (2009-2019, eight centers). Noncurative ER was defined as positive resected margins on pathology, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), poor differentiation, or submucosal invasion. The pathology after ER and esophagectomy was analyzed to identify predictors of nodal metastasis and residual tumor.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 128 patients. Primary residual tumor and nodal metastasis were confirmed in 25 (19.5%) and 15 (11.7%) patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, nodal metastasis was independently associated with submucosal invasion [odds ratio (OR), 9.9; 95% CI, 1.1-96.1], LVI (OR, 20.9; 95% CI, 2.9-150.5), and tumor size ≥ 2 cm (OR, 8.1; 95% CI, 1.4-48.2) (all P < 0.05), but not with poor differentiation (P = 0.613). Regarding residual primary tumor, only positive vertical margin was significant factor (OR, 147; 95% CI, 18 to > 999; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional esophagectomy after noncurative ER allowed the resection of residual tumor and nodal metastasis, with favorable outcomes. Close follow-up may be feasible for a positive horizontal margin alone or poor differentiation alone, whereas intensive treatment should be considered for patients with submucosal invasion, LVI, and a positive vertical margin, especially when combined with tumor size ≥ 2 cm. Prospective research is needed to confirm the optimal management after ER.

Additional Treatment Following Noncurative Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison of Outcomes between Esophagectomy and Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) has been widely implemented for cT1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Additional therapy, including esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), is sometimes required after noncurative ER.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who received any additional treatment following noncurative ER (positive vertical margins, lymphovascular invasion, or invasion depth of submucosa or more), and compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the two treatment modalities.

RESULTS

Of 108 patients, 56 underwent esophagectomy (E group), and 52 received CRT (CRT group). A positive vertical margin was observed in 17 (14.8%) patients and high risks of occult lymph node metastasis were observed in 91 (85.2%) patients, as well as lymphovascular invasion in 35 (32.4%) patients, invasion depth of the submucosa or more in 27 (25.0%) patients, and both in 29 (26.9%) patients. The E group patients were significantly younger (p = 0.046) and tended to present with larger tumors than those in the CRT group (p = 0.057). Lymphatic invasion was more frequent in the E group (p = 0.019), and, furthermore, one treatment-related death was observed in the E group. There were no significant differences between the groups in overall and disease-specific survival (p = 0.406 and 0.151, respectively), however, recurrence was only observed in the CRT group.

CONCLUSION

Both esophagectomy and CRT are safe and effective as additional treatments after noncurative ER in patients with ESCC. Esophagectomy is oncologically safe, whereas a risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality remains. Although the adverse events are acceptable, CRT has a certain degree of risk of disease recurrence.

Clinical Outcome of Additional Esophagectomy After Endoscopic Treatment for Superficial Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment is one of the options for superficial esophageal cancer, but additional therapy such as esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is sometimes needed due to noncurative resection. However, the outcome of additional therapy after endoscopic treatment has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

In 160 patients with superficial esophageal cancer, including 37 patients who underwent esophagectomy and 123 patients who underwent CRT after noncurative endoscopic resection, outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

The CRT group included more elderly patients than the surgery group, although there were no significant differences in tumor depth or lymphovascular invasion between the two groups. Overall survival was significantly better in the surgery group than in the CRT group (5-year overall survival: 94.3% vs. 79.9%; p = 0.039). Two (5.4%) patients in the surgery group who developed lymph node recurrence achieved complete response by chemotherapy or CRT, and 9 of 16 patients (13.0%) in the CRT group who developed recurrence underwent salvage esophagectomy or lymphadenectomy. As a result, the 5-year cause-specific survival was 100% in the surgery group and 92.8% in the CRT group. SM2 invasion (≥ SM2) was significantly associated with recurrence after CRT, while lymphatic invasion was associated with lymph node metastasis in the surgery group.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment combined with esophagectomy or CRT can be a curative treatment option in patients with superficial esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy rather than CRT should be recommended for patients with massive submucosal tumor invasion due to the risk of recurrence after CRT.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Additional Esophagectomy After Noncurative Endoscopic Resection and Upfront Esophagectomy for T1N0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy with lymph node dissection is a choice of additional treatment after noncurative endoscopic resection (ER) of T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The efficacy and safety of esophagectomy in this situation remain unclear when compared with upfront esophagectomy.

METHODS

We investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of 321 patients with clinical T1N0M0 ESCC who underwent curative esophagectomy, and compared the status of lymph node metastasis, surgical results, and the prognosis between the ER and non-ER groups.

RESULTS

The ER group consisted of 57 patients (17.8%), while the non-ER group consisted of 264 patients (82.2%). The incidence of lymph node metastasis was not significantly different between the ER (24.6%) and non-ER groups (30.7%), and there was no significant difference in surgical outcomes between the groups. The distribution of metastatic lymph nodes was very similar between the groups. However, 13 of 14 patients (93%) with lymph node metastasis in the ER group and 63 of 82 patients (77%) with lymph node metastasis in the non-ER group had pN1 disease, while the remaining 18 patients (23%) with lymph node metastasis in the non-ER group had pN2 or N3 disease. Overall and relapse-free survival rates were significantly better in the ER group than in the non-ER group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). To date, no patients in the ER group experienced disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional esophagectomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients after noncurative ER.

Feasibility of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Relative Indications

BACKGROUNDS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely performed in the treatment of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Few studies have compared the long-term outcomes of esophageal ESD based on absolute indications and relative indications. The aim of the current study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of ESD for early ESCC with relative indications.

METHODS

297 patients with early ESCC who underwent ESD were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into 3 groups: group A, the absolute indications group; group B, the relative indications without additional treatment after ESD group; and group C, the relative indications with additional treatment after ESD group. The baseline characteristics, therapeutic efficacy, complications, prognosis outcomes, and follow-up data were evaluated.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 51.0 months (range 6-101 months), the incidence of local recurrence in groups A, B, and C was 1.63% (3/184), 4.23% (3/71), and 0 (0/42), respectively (p = 0.253). The 5-year overall survival rates were 97.83% (95% CI: 95.69-99.95%) in group A, 95.77% (95% CI: 90.95-100.00%) in group B, and 97.62% (95% CI: 92.81-100.00%) in group C with no significant differences among these 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is a feasible and effective treatment for early ESCC with relative indications. Under the premise of sufficient preoperative assessment and scheduled postoperative endoscopic surveillance, additional treatment might not be necessary for patients with relative indications after ESD procedures.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer

The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has developed endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines. These guidelines present recommendations in response to 18 clinical questions concerning the preoperative diagnosis, indications, resection methods, curability assessment, and surveillance of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for esophageal cancers based on a systematic review of the scientific literature.

Adjuvant therapy for pT1a-m3/pT1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after endoscopic resection: Esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy? A critical review

Endoscopic resection (ER) combined with adjuvant therapy appears to be a new treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancers (ESCC) invading to deep mucosa (pT1a-m3) or submucosa (pT1b). Adjuvant therapy can take the form of esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), but it is unclear which treatment is better. This review is to explore the outcomes of adjuvant therapy between esophagectomy and CRT for the treatment of pT1a-m3/pT1b ESCC after ER. Ten relevant studies with a total of 285 patients were included. The reported 5-year overall survival rates ranged between 90-100 % for ER-esophagectomy and 75-85 % for ER-CRT. ESCC with the invasion of ≥ sm2 combined with lymphovascular involvement was associated with a high-risk of relapse in patients receiving ER-CRT, but not in ER-esophagectomy. In conclusion, patients with a high-risk of relapse should be treated with ER-esophagectomy; ER-CRT may be used as an alternative treatment for patients with a nonhigh risk of relapse.