Predicting lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis based on magnetic resonance imaging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer

Diagnostic accuracy of lateral lymph node metastasis for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal criteria for lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy remain undefined. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) to refine criteria for selective LLND.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (10 August 2024) identified studies assessing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based LLNM detection in patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgery. Studies reporting MRI-based LLNM assessments with pathological confirmation were included. Non-English studies, reviews, case reports, and those lacking lymph node size data were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were estimated using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (HSROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. All used MRI-based size assessments. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.776 (95% CI: 0.639-0.872) and 0.694 (95% CI: 0.541-0.813), respectively, with an HSROC area under the curve (AUC) of 0.801.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is the most widely used modality for diagnosing LLNM in rectal cancer patients who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy, with size criteria being the most commonly applied.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42024578499).

Predicting lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer patients using MRI radiomics: a multicenter retrospective study

MRI has relatively low sensitivity and specificity in detecting lymph node metastases. This study aimed to develop and validate an MRI radiomics-based model for predicting lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis in rectal cancer patients who underwent LPLN dissection, and to compare its performance with that of radiologists. This multicenter retrospective study included 336 rectal cancer patients (199 men; mean age, 58.9 years ± 11.1 [standard deviation]) who underwent LPLN dissection. Patients were divided into development (n = 190) and validation (n = 146) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from MR images, and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used to construct radiomics and clinical-radiomics models. Model performance was compared with radiologists using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Malignant LPLN was diagnosed in 32.4% of the development cohort (65/190) and 32.9% of the validation cohort (48/146) (P = 0.798). Seven radiomics features and two clinical features were selected. The radiomics and clinical-radiomics models demonstrated area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.819 and 0.830 in the development cohort and 0.821 and 0.829 in the validation cohort, respectively. The optimal cut-off (- 0.47) yielded sensitivities of 72.3% and 45.8% and specificities of 82.4% and 87.8% in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Decision curve analysis indicated no additional net benefit from the clinical-radiomics model compared to the radiomics-only model. Radiologists' AUCs were significantly lower than that of the radiomics model (0.842) and improved with radiomics probability scores (0.734 vs. 0.801; 0.668 vs. 0.791). The MRI-based radiomics model significantly improves the prediction of LPLN metastasis in rectal cancer, outperforming conventional criteria used by radiologists.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Distinguishing Metastatic Lymph Nodes from Nonmetastatic Among Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective  The objective of this research was to assess the proficiency of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (QDCE-MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in distinguishing between metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes in cases of rectal carcinoma. Method  This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. Two independent reviewers systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The research took place in July 2022, with no restriction on the initial date of publication. For the analysis, we utilized Stata software (version 16.0), Review Manager (version 5.3), and the Open Meta-Analyst computational tool. Results  A total of 19 studies consisting of 1,451 patients were included in the current meta-analysis. The differences between metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph node parameters were significant by using short axis and Ktrans (6.9 ± 4 vs. 5.4 ± 0.5, 0.22 ± 0.1 vs. 0.14 ± 0.1, respectively). Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) showed 73% sensitivity, 71% specificity, and 79% accuracy in detecting metastatic lymph nodes among rectal cancer patients based on six included studies ( n  = 530). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of QDCE-MRI using Ktrans was calculated to be 80, 79, and 80%, respectively. Furthermore, PET-computed tomography (CT) showed a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 91%, and accuracy of 86% in distinguishing metastatic lymph nodes. Quality utility analysis showed that using CE-MRI, QDCE-MRI, and PET-CT would increase the posttest probability to 69, 73, and 85%, respectively. Conclusion  QDCE-MRI demonstrates a commendable sensitivity and specificity, but slightly overshadowed by the higher specificity of PET-CT at 91%, despite comparable sensitivities. However, the heterogeneity in PET-CT sensitivity across studies and its high specificity indicate variability that can influence clinical decision-making. Thus, combining these imaging techniques and perhaps newer methods like PET/MRI could enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce variability, and improve patient management strategies in rectal cancer.

Lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score: predictive clinic-radiological model of lateral pelvic lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

The population in Western countries differs significantly from that in Eastern countries, and the prevalence of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement in Western populations remains largely unknown due to the limited application of LPLN dissection (LPLND). This discrepancy is primarily attributed to the higher body mass index commonly observed in Western populations, which increases the risk of intraoperative complications. Consequently, the aim of this study is to describe a specific Western clinico-radiological selection tool for LPLND, namely, the lateral pelvic lymph node positivity (LPLNP) score.

METHODS

This retrospective single center study was designed to elaborate the LPLNP score, which was further tested on a prospective cohort of patients. Clinical and MRI factors associated with LPLN involvement were identified, and logistic regression was used to establish the LPLNP score.

RESULTS

In the retrospective series, 120 patients underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. After stepwise logistic regression, five parameters were ultimately included in the LPLNP score. When tested on 66 prospectively selected patients, 40 with an LPLNP score > 0.23 (corresponding to the highest sensitivity and specificity) underwent LPLND: 22 patients (55%) had pathologically confirmed positive LPLN. The negative predictive value of the LPLNP score was 96%, with a sensitivity of 95.7% and a specificity of 58.1%.

CONCLUSION

The LPLNP score was developed based on the largest group of Western patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This scoring system demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity during validation on the prospective series, correctly identifying LPLN involvement in 55% of cases.

Successfully Resected Isolated Lateral Lymph Node Recurrence in a Patient with T1 Lower Rectal Cancer: Case Report and Literature Review

Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis in T1 rectal cancer has an incidence of less than 1%. However, its clinical features are largely uncharted. We report a case of LLN metastasis in T1 rectal cancer and review the relevant literature. A 56-year-old female underwent rectal resection for lower rectal cancer 2 years previously (pT1bN0M0). During follow-up, an elevated tumor marker CA19-9 was documented. Enhanced CT and MRI showed a round shape nodule 2 cm in size on the left side of pelvic wall. PET-CT showed high accumulation of FDG in the same lesion, leading to a diagnosis of isolated LLN recurrence. Because no other site of recurrence was detected, surgical resection of the LLN was performed. Microscopic findings were consistent with metastatic lymph node originating from the recent rectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy for six months was given, and patient remains free of recurrent disease seven months after LLN resection. Although LLN recurrence after surgery for T1 rectal cancer is rare, post-surgical follow-up should not be omitted. When LLN metastasis is suspected on CT, MRI and/or PET-CT will be recommended. Surgical resection of LLN metastasis in patients with T1 rectal cancer may lead to favorable outcomes, when recurrence in other areas is not observed.

Risk factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is one of the prominent reasons for local recurrence (LR) in patients with rectal cancer (RC). The evaluation criteria of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for patients in eastern (mainly in Japan) and western countries have been controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in order to guide surgical methods.

Methods

We searched relevant databases (Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 05 October 2022 to evaluate the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in patients with RC in this meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 24 articles with 5843 patients were included in this study. The overall results showed that female sex, age <60 years, pretherapeutic CEA level >5 ng/ml, clinical T4 stage (cT4), clinical M1 stage (cM1), distance of the tumour from the anal verge (AV) <50 mm, tumour centre located below the peritoneal reflection (Rb), short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥8 mm before nCRT, short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥5 mm after nCRT, border irregularity of LPLN, tumour size ≥50 mm, pathological T3-4 stage (pT3-4), pathological N2 stage (pN2), mesorectal lymph node metastasis (MLNM), lymphatic invasion (LI), venous invasion (VI), CRM (+) and poor differentiation were significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis (P <0.05).

Conclusion

This study summarized almost all potential risk factors of LPLN metastasis and expected to provide effective treatment strategies for patients with LRC. According to the risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis, we can adopt different comprehensive treatment strategies. High-risk patients can perform lateral lymph node dissection to effectively reduce local recurrence; In low-risk patients, we can avoid overtreatment, reduce complications and trauma caused by lateral lymph node dissection, and maximize patient survival and quality of life.

Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for minimally invasive lateral pelvic lymph node dissection of advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study comparing short-term outcomes

PURPOSE

The importance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) for advanced low rectal cancer is gradually being recognized in Europe and the USA, where some patients were affected by uncontrolled lateral pelvic lymph node (LLNs) metastasis, even after total mesorectal excision (TME) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was thus to compare robotic LLND (R-LLND) with laparoscopic (L-LLND) to clarify the safety and advantages of R-LLND.

METHODS

Sixty patients were included in this single-institution retrospective study between January 2013 and July 2022. We compared the short-term outcomes of 27 patients who underwent R-LLND and 33 patients who underwent L-LLND.

RESULTS

En bloc LLND was performed in significantly more patients in the R-LLND than in the L-LLND group (48.1% vs. 15.2%; p = 0.006). The numbers of LLNs on the distal side of the internal iliac region (LN 263D) harvested were significantly higher in the R-LLND than in the L-LLND group (2 [0-9] vs. 1 [0-6]; p = 0.023). The total operative time was significantly longer in the R-LLND than in the L-LLND group (587 [460-876] vs. 544 [398-859]; p = 0.003); however, the LLND time was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.718). Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study clarified the safety and technical feasibility of R-LLND with respect to L-LLND. Our findings suggest that the robotic approach offers a key advantage, allowing significantly more LLNs to be harvested from the distal side of the internal iliac region (LN 263D). Prospective clinical trials examining the oncological superiority of R-LLND are thus necessary in the near future.

The Role of Preoperative Imaging in the Detection of Lateral Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different techniques exist for the imaging of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic MRI, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, and 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI for the identification of lateral lymph node metastases in rectal cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources include PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic MRI, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, and 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI for the preoperative detection of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions were pelvic MRI, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, and/or 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Definitive histopathology was used as a criterion standard.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies (1,827 patients) were included out of an initial search yielding 7,360 studies. The pooled sensitivity of pelvic MRI was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91), of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86), and of 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.51-0.87) for the detection of lateral lymph node metastasis. The pooled specificity of pelvic MRI was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98), and of 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96). The area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) for pelvic MRI and was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86) for 18 F-FDG-PET/CT.

LIMITATIONS

Heterogeneity in terms of patients' populations, definitions of suspect lateral lymph nodes, and administration of neoadjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For the preoperative identification of lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer, this review found compelling evidence that pelvic MRI should constitute the imaging modality of choice. In contrast, to confirm the presence of lateral lymph node metastasis, 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI modalities allow discarding false positive cases because of increased specificity.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020200319.

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of locally advanced low rectal cancer: Summary of the current evidence

Lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) are a major site for local recurrence following curative resection for low locally advanced rectal cancer. Ongoing advances in imaging techniques have improved predicting LPLN metastasis (LPLNM) during pre-operative staging. However, there is ongoing debate on optimal management of this subgroup of patients with variation between guidance of different societies. In Japan, LPLNM is considered as local disease and addressed by lateral pelvic node dissection (LPLND) in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME). However, in the west, LPLNM is considered as metastatic disease and those patients are offered neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by TME surgery. The potential surgical risks and morbidity associated with LPLND as well as the uncertainty of the oncological outcome have raised the concern that patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer with LPLNM could be over or under-treated. A comprehensive review of literature was performed, summarizing the current evidence on available modalities for predicting LPLNM, the role of LPLND in the management of advanced low rectal cancer and the available surgical approaches with their impact on surgical and oncological outcomes. LPLND is associated with increased operative time, blood loss and post-operative morbidity. The potential benefits for local disease control and survival still awaits high quality studies. There has been increasing number of reports of the use minimally invasive approaches in LPLND in an attempt to reduce post-operative complications. There is need for high quality evidence to define the role of LPLND in management of patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Does adding lateral pelvic lymph node dissection to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in low rectal cancer?

PURPOSE

Lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis occurs in 15 to 20% of patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer which increases risk of local recurrence and reduced survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME). Adding lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) could improve outcomes in those patients. This review aims to determine if the addition of LPLND to the conventional management of advanced rectal cancer would yield improved outcomes.

METHODS

OVID Medline, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov , EMBASE, Clinicaltrialsregister.eu, Web of Knowledge and CABAbstracts were searched using the following keywords: 'lateral pelvic lymph node dissection', 'pelvis lymphadenectomy', 'chemoradi*', 'rectal cancer', 'rectal neoplasm', 'rectal carcinoma' and 'rectal tumour'. Studies were included if they were in English and included rectal cancer patients that had nCRT, rectal resection ± LPLND. Primary outcome was 3-year and 5-year local recurrence. Secondary outcome was 3-year and 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

Six studies were identified with 1210 patients who had nCRT and TME, and 268 patients who had nCRT and rectal resection plus LPLND. Patients who had LPLND had non-significant lower 3-year and 5-year local recurrence rate compared with those who did not (p = 0.10 and p = 0.12, respectively). They demonstrated a lower 3-year overall survival but higher 5-year overall survival and both were not significant (p = 0.81 and p = 0.57, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Available evidence suggests that there is no significant reduction in local recurrence rates or improved survival from LPLND to the current treatment modalities. Further studies are required to define the role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in low rectal cancer.