D2 lymph node dissection confers little benefit on the overall survival of older patients with resectable gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis of a multi-institutional dataset

Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on short-term and long-term outcomes in elderly patients with colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The oncologic impact of D3 lymph node dissection (LND) for colon cancer (CC) has been reported to be favorable. However, D3 LND is potentially more invasive than non-D3 LND, and whether it is beneficial for elderly patients with CC remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative safety and short- and long-term oncologic outcomes of D3 LND in elderly patients with CC.

METHODS

Subjects were 442 elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent curative surgery for pathologic stage (pStage) I-III CC between 2011 and 2022. Background clinical factors and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who received D3 LND (D3 group; n = 363) and those who received non-D3 LND (non-D3 group; n = 79).

RESULTS

The D3 group had a significantly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (median 20 vs. 12, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of postoperative complications (18% vs. 32%, p = 0.040) than the non-D3 group. In the overall cohort, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups. Among pStage III patients, however, OS was significantly better (69.8% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.028), and RFS tended to be better (60.7% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.075) in the D3 group than in the non-D3 group. Multivariable analysis revealed that D3 LND was independently associated with better OS (HR 0.477; 95% CI 0.245-0.931, p = 0.030) and tended to be associated with better RFS (HR 0.588; 95% CI 0.329-1.051, p = 0.073).

CONCLUSION

D3 LND is safe and effective in improving the prognosis of elderly patients with pStage II/III CC.

Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (≥65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72-1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62-1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74-2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75-4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.

Therapeutic Potential of Antibody Targeting Neuronal Pentraxin Receptor in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a poor prognosis despite advances in multidisciplinary treatments and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We previously reported that neural pentraxin receptor (NPTXR), a transmembrane protein mainly expressed in the brain and involved in synaptic transmission, is implicated in gastric cancer malignancy. This study evaluated the expression and function of NPTXR in ESCC, the therapeutic potential of monoclonal antibody (mAb) against NPTXR, and its prognostic value in ESCC patients.

METHODS

The study involved analyzing the NPTXR expression in 21 ESCC cell lines and total 371 primary ESCC tissue samples using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. The impact of NPTXR on the malignant behavior of ESCC was examined using small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown and a subsequent assessment of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and adhesion. This study further investigated the efficacy of anti-NPTXR mAb in vitro and associations between the expression of NPTXR messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein with clinicopathological factors and the prognosis.

RESULTS

NPTXR was overexpressed in several ESCC cell lines and primary ESCC tissues. Knockdown of NPTXR in ESCC cells resulted in reduced proliferation, increased apoptosis, and decreased cell adhesion. The mAb against NPTXR significantly inhibited ESCC cell proliferation in vitro. A high NPTXR expression in patient tissues was correlated with a worse overall survival, suggesting its potential as a prognostic biomarker.

CONCLUSIONS

NPTXR influences the malignant behavior of ESCC cells. Anti-NPTXR mAb may be a promising therapeutic agent, and its expression in ESCC tissues may serve as a prognostic biomarker.

Exacerbated prognostic impact of multiple intramural metastasis versus single intramural metastasis of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from an Uzbekistan cohort

PURPOSE

Intramural metastasis (IM) is a poor prognostic factor for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted this study to assess the prognostic impact of IM in an Uzbekistan cohort and to identify the factors associated with the poor prognosis of patients with ESCC and IM.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 1083 patients with thoracic ESCC, who underwent curative esophagectomy between 2001 and 2021 at the National Cancer Center of Uzbekistan. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with versus those without IM and evaluated the factors associated with the poor prognosis of patients with IM.

RESULTS

Patients with pathological IM (n = 59, 5.4%) were significantly older, had a higher percentage of lymphatic invasion and worse pathological N stage, and had shorter overall survival (OS) than patients without IM. Multivariable analysis of OS identified multiple IMs as the only independent prognostic factor in patients with IM (hazard ratio, 6.04; 95% confidence interval, 2.77-13.18; P < 0.001). Patients with multiple IMs had shorter OS and recurrence-free survival than those with a single IM.

CONCLUSION

IM was a poor prognostic factor for patients with ESCC in this Uzbekistan cohort and multiple IMs were associated with worse outcomes.

Increased STX3 transcript and protein levels were associated with poor prognosis in two independent cohorts of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Some conventional prognostic biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have the disadvantage that they have only been investigated at the level of either mRNA or protein levels or only in individual cohorts. Associations between Syntaxin 3 (STX3) expression and malignancy have been reported in several tumor types but not in ESCC. Here, we investigated the levels of both STX3 mRNA and protein, and its prognostic potential in two independent cohorts of patients with ESCC.

METHODS

STX3 mRNA levels were examined in surgical specimens by quantitative PCR in a cohort that included 176 ESCC patients. STX3 protein levels were investigated in surgically resected ESCC tissues by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays in a different cohort of 177 ESCC patients. Correlations were analyzed between the expression of STX3 mRNA and protein with clinicopathological factors and long-term prognosis.

RESULTS

Quantitative PCR indicated a significant association between high level of STX3 mRNA expression and lymph node involvement, pathological stage, and poor overall survival. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that high STX3 mRNA expression was independently associated with poor overall survival outcomes. Immunohistochemistry revealed that STX3 protein expression in ESCC tissues and high STX3 protein expression were also significantly correlated with unfavorable overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Overexpression of STX3 mRNA and protein may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers for ESCC patients.

Identification of stromal cell-derived factor 4 as a liquid biopsy-based diagnostic marker in solid cancers

There is a need for serum diagnostic biomarkers to improve the prognosis of solid malignant tumors. Here, we conducted a single-institutional study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum stromal cell-derived factor 4 (SDF4) levels in cancer patients. Serum samples were collected from a total of 582 patients with solid cancers including gastric cancer (GC) and 80 healthy volunteers. SDF4 protein levels in sera, and conditioned media or lysates of human GC cell lines were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and those in GC tissue by immunohistochemistry. Serum SDF4 levels were higher in patients with cancer than the healthy control in all cancer type. Regarding GC, serum SDF4 levels distinguished healthy controls from GC patients with the area under the curve value of 0.973, sensitivity of 89%, and specificity of 99%. Serum SDF4 levels were significantly elevated in patient with early stage GC. In immunohistochemistry, the frequency of SDF4-positive GC tumors did not vary significantly between GC stages. The ability of human GC cell lines to both produce and secrete SDF4 was confirmed in vitro. In conclusion, serum SDF4 levels could be a promising candidate for a novel diagnostic biomarker for GC and other malignancies.

Site-specific protein biomarkers in gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of novel biomarkers and clinical applications

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, thus representing a significant global health burden. Early detection and monitoring of GC are essential to improve patient outcomes. While traditional cancer biomarkers such as carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and CA 72-4 are widely used, their limited sensitivity and specificity necessitate the exploration of alternative biomarkers.

AREAS COVERED

This review comprehensively analyzes the landscape of GC protein biomarkers identified from 2019 to 2022, with a focus on tissue, blood, urine, saliva, gastric juice, ascites, and exhaled breath as sample sources. We address the potential clinical applications of these biomarkers in early diagnosis, monitoring recurrence, and predicting survival and therapeutic response of GC patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The discovery of novel protein biomarkers holds great promise for improving the clinical management of GC. However, further validation in large, diverse cohorts is needed to establish the clinical utility of these biomarkers. Integrating these biomarkers with existing diagnostic and monitoring approaches will likely lead to improved personalized treatment plans and patient outcomes.

Is D2 Lymphadenectomy Necessary in Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study

Objective

We retrospectively analyzed the validity of limited lymphadenectomy (D1 and D1+) in elderly gastric cancer patients.

Summary of background data

According to the aging trend in Japan, patients with gastric cancer are continuing to age. The extent of lymphadenectomy preferable for older patients is unclear.

Methods

The data of 35 and 52 patients ≥80 years old with cT2− or N(+) gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and limited lymphadenectomy, respectively, at 2 institutions between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

The patients who underwent limited lymphadenectomy were older and their Onodera prognostic nutritional indexes were poorer than those who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy, although the differences were not significant. After propensity score matching, 28 patients in each group were analyzed. No significant differences in postoperative complications, initial recurrence sites, or causes of death were observed between the 2 groups except for postoperative respiratory failure, which was more frequent after D2 lymphadenectomy. The median overall survival time after D2 and limited lymphadenectomy was 73.9 and 70.9 months, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 1.32 (P = 0.53).

Conclusions

D1+ or even D1 lymphadenectomy may be acceptable for patients ≥80 years old with advanced gastric cancer.

Validity and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1+ lymphadenectomy for very elderly advanced gastric cancer patients; retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy with optimal lymphadenectomy is appropriate for very elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. This study aimed to assess the validity of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1+ lymphadenectomy performed for advanced gastric cancer in patients aged 80 years or more.

METHODS

Included in this retrospective study were 122 patients who underwent curative laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer between 2013 and 2018. All patients over 80 years old underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1+ lymphadenectomy. We divided patients by age between those who were very elderly (age ≥ 80 years; very elderly group [n = 57]) and those who were non-very elderly (age < 80 years; control group [n = 65]), and we compared patient and clinicopathological characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and short- and long-term outcomes between the two groups. We also performed multivariate analyses to identify predictors of postoperative prognosis.

RESULTS

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of grade 2 or higher and mean Charlson comorbidity index score and body mass index were significantly different between the very elderly group and the control group. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used in relatively few very elderly group patients. Operation time, blood loss volume, and postoperative morbidity and mortality did not differ between the two groups. The overall survival and disease-specific survival rate of very elderly group patients with the Charlson comorbidity index score of <3 was not significantly different from that of the control group patients.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of advanced gastric cancer by laparoscopic gastrectomy with D1+ lymphadenectomy to be both safe and effective in the very elderly group patients with the Charlson comorbidity index score of <3.