Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated by laparoscopic surgery: report of three cases

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for the management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study to minimize heterogeneity between groups and focus on the difference between surgery strategies.

SETTINGS

Eleven Chinese tertiary hospitals participated in this study.

PATIENTS

A total of 364 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors were retrospectively analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relapse-free survival, postoperative hospital stay length, and 30-day postoperative complication rate were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

We enrolled 214 patients who underwent surgical operation for primary localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. After propensity score matching, 134 cases involved in the comparison (67 laparoscopic vs 67 open surgery) were randomly matched (1:1) by sex, age, tumor size, tumor site, and neoadjuvant therapy. The laparoscopic surgery group had superior relapse-free survival (χ2 = 4.46, p = 0.04), and fewer complications (6.0% vs 25.4%, p = 0.002). No significant difference was found in the length of postoperative hospital stay between the laparoscopic surgery and open surgery groups (9.66 ± 5.42 vs. 10.64 ± 4.93, p = 0.28). Subgroup analysis showed that the laparoscopic surgery group had superior relapse-free survival (χ2 = 4.14, p = 0.04) and fewer complications after surgery (2.9% vs 24.4%, p = 0.01) in the rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤5 cm subgroup.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the nature of retrospective reviews and relatively short follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery offers a safe and feasible option for the radical resection of primary localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors, especially for patients with rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤5 cm. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B764.

CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA VERSUS CIRUGA ABIERTA PARA TUMORES DEL ESTROMA GASTROINTESTINAL DE RECTO UN ANLISIS MULTICNTRICO EMPAREJADO POR PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN

ANTECEDENTES:Se desconoce la seguridad y factibilidad de la cirugía laparoscópica para el tratamiento de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados quirúrgicos y oncológicos de la cirugía laparoscópica versus cirugía abierta para el tratamiento de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico emparejado por puntuación de propensión para minimizar la heterogeneidad entre los grupos y centrarse en las diferencias entre las estrategias quirúrgicas.AJUSTES:Once hospitales terciarios de la China participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente un total de 364 pacientes con tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto confirmados patológicamente.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Supervivencia sin recidiva, duración de la estancia hospitalaria postquirúrgica y tasa de complicaciones postquirúrgicas a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:Inscribimos a 214 pacientes que fueron sometidos a cirugía por tumores primariamente localizados del estroma gastrointestinal de recto. Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, 134 casos involucrados en la comparación (67 laparoscópicos versus 67 cirugía abierta) fueron emparejados aleatoriamente (1: 1) por sexo, edad, tamaño del tumor, sitio del tumor y terapia neoadyuvante. El grupo de cirugía laparoscópica tuvo una supervivencia sin recidiva superior (χ2 = 4,46, p = 0,04) y menos complicaciones (6,0% frente a 25,4%, p = 0,002). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria postquirúrgica entre los grupos de cirugía laparoscópica y cirugía abierta (9,66 ± 5,42 frente a 10,64 ± 4,93, p = 0,28). El análisis de subgrupos mostró que el grupo de cirugía laparoscópica tuvo una supervivencia sin recidiva superior (χ2 = 4,14, p = 0,04) y menos complicaciones después de la cirugía (2,9% frente a 24,4%, p = 0,01) en el subgrupo de tumores del estroma gastrointestinal de recto ≤ 5 cm.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza de la revisión retrospectiva y el período de seguimiento relativamente corto son limitaciones de este estudio.CONCLUSIONES:La cirugía laparoscópica ofrece una opción segura y factible para la resección radical de tumores primariamente localizados del estroma gastrointestinal de recto, especialmente para pacientes con tumores ≤5 cm. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B764.

Combined endo-laparoscopic treatment of large gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: Report of a case and literature review

•

We report a case of 75-year-old Caucasian men with unknown voluminous gastric GIST, who came to our attention complaining melena. We decided to perform a laparoscopic-endoscopic combined surgical approach.

•

Intraoperative endoscopy identified gastric GIST and confirmed the submucosal origin and the integrity of the capsule. A 10 cm laparoscopic gastrotomy was carried out along the gastric found in order to realize a laparo-endoscopic rendez-vous technique.

•

Laparoscopy has rapidly become a preferable approach for gastric GISTs surgical treatment. The magnified view and the lesser invasiveness of laparoscopic technique allow the surgeon to perform a more meticulous dissection, preventing unexpected bleeding and causing less muscular trauma and less bowel manipulation. All these favourable short-term outcomes associated with laparoscopy do not compromise oncologic results.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common malignant subepithelial lesions of gastrointestinal tract, originating from Cajal’s cells and characterized by the over expression of tyrosine kinase receptor C-KIT. The prognosis of this disease is associated with tumour size and mitotic index. Standard treatment of a GIST with no metastasis is surgical resection.

Presentation of case

We report a case of a 75-year-old Caucasian man with unknown voluminous gastric GIST, who came to our attention complaining black stool. We decided to perform a laparoscopic-endoscopic combined surgical approach. Intraoperative gastroscopy identified the gastric GIST and confirmed the submucosal origin and the integrity of the tumor capsule. A 10 cm laparoscopic gastrotomy was carried out along the gastric fundus in order to realize a laparo-endoscopic rendez-vous procedure.

Discussion

Laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe for Gastric GIST both in elective and urgent settings. Even for lesions greater than 5 cm, laparoscopy shows a recurrence rate similar to open surgery when radical resection are performed. An important point to take in consideration is surgical team experience, which seems to be one of the most important factors reducing the incidence of operative complications with better long-term outcomes, both postoperative and oncological.

Conclusion

Mini-invasive approaches for gastric GIST are safe and feasible. The combined approach both laparoscopic and endoscopic has shown to be an effective technique and it may allow a better exposure of the tumour which ensure a radical resection.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the first choice for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). With the development of new instruments and techniques, the popularity of laparoscopic resection of GISTs has increased rapidly. Previous studies on the advantages of laparoscopic resection over open surgery are generally limited by methodology or data capacity. This study evaluated the efficacy of laparoscopic resection and open surgery in gastric GISTs using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2017, 1027 patients were diagnosed with primary GIST at our institution. Among them, 548 patients were enrolled in this study. Standard demographic and clinicopathological data were collected from our database. Selection bias was eliminated using the PSM methods.

RESULTS

After PSM, 256 cases involved in the comparison (128 laparoscopic (LAP) vs. 128 open surgery (OPEN)) were randomly matched (1:1) by age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, year of surgery, tumor location, tumor size, mitotic rate, and treatment with adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The LAP group was superior to the OPEN group in blood loss (χ² = 6.048, P = 0.049), time to first flatus (49.41 ± 7.56 vs. 71.31 ± 4.87 h, P < 0.001), and hospital stay (10.21 ± 6.05 vs. 12.56 ± 5.43 days, P = 0.001). No significant differences were seen in either the relapse-free survival or overall survival between the LAP and OPEN groups. In tumors located in favorable locations, the LAP group showed less blood loss (P = 0.008) and less multivisceral resection (17.8% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs is associated with improved surgical outcomes and postoperative courses and comparable oncological outcomes, regardless of favorable or unfavorable tumor location.

Retrospective study of laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on the propensity score matching method

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection with a free margin is considered the gold standard for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Previous studies about the advantages of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery have generally been non-randomized and retrospective and have some obvious shortcomings that could influence the veracity and reliability of the results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic resection in the treatment of gastric GISTs using the propensity score matching (PSM) method.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2014, 217 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic or open resection for gastric GISTs were enrolled in a retrospective, single-center study. Patient and tumor characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics, and oncologic outcomes were collected from a database. The efficacy of the laparoscopic approach was analyzed using the PSM method by comparing the clinical parameters of patients who underwent laparoscopic (LAP) and open resection (OPEN) procedures.

RESULTS

After PSM, 88 patients involved in the analysis (44 LAP vs. 44 OPEN) were randomly matched (1:1) by tumor size, localization, disease course, body mass index, age, and gender. The LAP group was clearly superior to the open group in terms of intraoperative indicators and postoperative short-term efficacy. The incidence of postoperative complications in the LAP group was lower than in the OPEN group (4.5 vs. 18.2 %, P = 0.044). A survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the disease-free survival time between the two groups (χ ² = 0.211, P = 0.646).

CONCLUSION

These data should be processed using the PSM method in a non-randomized controlled trial (non-RCT) study. It is safe and feasible for patients with gastric GISTs up to 5 cm in size or located in the gastroesophageal junction to be treated with laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic single-stapling gastric transection for exophytic pedunculated gastrointestinal stromal tumor: is a safe procedure?

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The macroscopic growth of these lesions can be intraluminal, extraluminal, or intramural, but only 6 cases in literature report a description of the pedunculated type. A 69-year-old man was admitted to our department after an echocardiographical control revealing, as an incidental consequence, an epigastric mass. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed the presence of an oval lesion between the third segment of the liver and the front wall of the gastric antrum, measuring approximately 40 × 30 mm and suspected for pedunculated GIST. We describe the laparoscopic approach performed and the surgical technique that we suggest in similar cases. Although there are still many controversies on the use of laparoscopy in the treatment of gastric GISTs, laparoscopic resection can safely be adopted for an exophytic pedunculated GIST in an institute with experience in minimally invasive surgery.

Robotic gastric resection of large gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

The stomach is the most common site for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) development. Surgical treatment consists of excision of the entire neoplastic mass, with sufficient surgical margins within healthy tissue. This can be achieved with different techniques ranging from wedge resections, typical gastric resections, right up to total gastrectomy. There aren't clear guidelines for the use of minimally invasive approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2011 to April 2012, 5 patients with presumed preoperative diagnosis of GIST were treated by robotic surgery at the Unit of Surgery and Advanced Oncologic Therapies, Forlì Hospital, Forlì, Italy. We report operative techniques, perioperative outcomes and follow-up.

RESULTS

Lesions were localized at anterior wall of gastric antrum (N = 2) and near pyloric area (N = 3). Mean tumor size was 5 cm (range 4-7 cm). Surgical procedures were 5 distal gastrectomy. None intervention was converted to open surgery and there weren't major intraoperative complications. Median operative time was 240 min (range 210-300 min) and mean intraoperative blood loss was 96 ml (80-120 ml). All lesions had microscopically negative resection margins. Median follow-up was 13.5 months (range 12-15 months) with a disease-free survival rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical robotic approach for large GISTs is feasibility and new evidences are needed to clarify the effective role of different surgical strategies.

Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors presenting as left adrenal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare gastrointestinal malignancies. They are rarely seen near the urinary tract. In a literature review, only one case of GIST presenting as a left adrenal tumor was reported. We report two documented cases of gastric GISTs mimicking left adrenal tumors which were successfully treated with pure laparoscopic adrenalectomy and wedge resection of the stomach by excising the tumor from the stomach with serial firing of endoscopic gastrointestinal staplers. The surgical margins were clear, and the patients recovered smoothly. No adjuvant therapy with imatinib was prescribed. During the surveillance for 9 mo and 44 mo respectively, no tumor recurrence and metastasis were documented. Laparoscopic tumor excision, when adhering to the principles of surgical oncology, seems feasible and the prognosis is favorable for such tumors.

Laparoscopic treatment of splenosis: report of a case

A 52-year-old woman with a history of splenectomy for a splenic injury 45 years earlier underwent investigations for a pre-existing gynecologic disease. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a tumor, 3 cm in diameter, adjacent to the sigmoid colon, suggestive of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Laparoscopic exploration revealed a white mass protruding from the subserosa of the sigmoid colon, and we performed laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy to rule out a GIST. Pathological studies showed splenic tissue, thus confirming a diagnosis of splenosis, given the history of splenic injury. This case of splenosis mimicking GIST following splenic injury was diagnosed correctly and treated successfully with laparoscopic surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first case of splenosis treated with laparoscopic colectomy with no tumor extirpation.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum: an analysis of seven cases

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) rarely originate in the rectum. We investigated the clinicopathologic characteristics of rectal GISTs.

METHODS

We analyzed the medical records of seven patients who underwent surgery for GIST of the rectum between 1998 and 2003.

RESULTS

There were two men and five women with a median age of 55 years (range, 41-72 years) at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up period was 23 months (range, 7-75 months). The chief symptoms were hematochezia, constipation, and anal pain. All patients underwent curative resection; in the form of abdominoperineal resection in five patients, transanal excision in one, and Hartmann's operation with prostatectomy in one. The median tumor size was 6.6 cm (range, 1-12 cm). Four patients received adjuvant radiation therapy. Local recurrence developed in two patients; 54 months and 23 months after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The common symptoms of rectal GIST were the same as those of other rectal tumors. Curative surgical resection should be done, but further studies are necessary to investigate better adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with rectal GISTs.

Laparoscopic resection of clinically suspected gastric stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) account for 5% of all gastric tumors. Preoperative diagnosis is relatively difficult because biopsy samples are rarely obtained during fibergastroscopy. Surgical radical resection is the gold standard treatment, allowing pathologic study for both diagnosis and prognosis. Laparoscopic resection has become an alternative to the open approach, but long-term results are not well known. The aim of this study is to report experience with laparoscopic resection, placing special emphasis on preoperative diagnosis and describing long-term results. A retrospective analysis was made of all patients undergoing a laparoscopic resection for clinically suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors between November 1998 and August 2006 at 2 tertiary hospitals. The medical records of all participants were reviewed regarding surgical technique, clinicopathologic features, and postoperative long-term outcome. Laparoscopic gastric resection was attempted in 22 patients (13 women and 9 men) with a mean age of 66.7 years (range, 29-84 years). One patient had 2 gastric tumors. Tumor localization was upper gastric third in 6 patients, mid-gastric third in 7, and distal third in 10. Surgical techniques were transgastric submucosal excision (n = 1), wedge resection (n = 13), partial gastrectomy with Y-en-Roux reconstruction (n = 6), and total gastrectomy with Y-en-Roux reconstruction (n = 2). Two patients (9.1%) required conversion to the open procedure because of tumor size. Postoperative morbidity was delayed gastric emptying in 3 patients. Median postoperative stay was 6 days (range, 4-32 days). Pathologic and immunohistochemical study confirmed gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 18 cases. The other 4 cases were adenomyoma, hamartoma, plasmocytoma, and parasitic tumor (anisakis). Median tumor size was 5.6 cm (range, 2.5-12.5 cm) in cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors assessed according to mitotic index and size was low (n = 8), intermediate (n = 6), or high (n = 4). After a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 1-72 months), there was 1 case of recurrence of GIST. Definitive preoperative diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors is frequently difficult. The laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of these tumors seems safe and is associated with acceptable intermediate-term results, especially in cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Surgical management of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach

Small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (< 3 cm) occasionally are found in the stomach during endoscopy. There is no consensus about the surgical management of these small tumors, although this clinical issue is crucial because some of the tumors show unexpected malignant behavior. In this study, we evaluated the clinical management of patients with gastric GISTs who underwent surgical resection. Altogether, 31 patients with gastric GISTs were examined retrospectively. Surgical resection was fundamentally indicated for the patients with gastric GISTs suspected to be malignant by endoscopy or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The malignant grade of the GISTs was evaluated by the mitotic rate, tumor size, and MIB-1 index. EUS was useful for differentiating benign from malignant GISTs; but by limiting the study to patients with small tumors (< 3 cm), the diagnostic value of EUS was not satisfactory for defining the surgical indication. Tumors that were < 50 mm were successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery. Of the 31 patients, 4 had a relapse of the disease, and 1 of those 4 patients had a small tumor (30 mm). All of the recurrences were classified in the high risk category. Surgery is indicated for gastric GISTs that are > or = 20 mm or are suspected to be malignant based on EUS findings. Laparoscopic resection is feasible and is recommended as the treatment of choice for patients with tumors < 50 mm. Risk assessment can be most useful for predicting recurrence.

Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: not all tumors are created equal

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic resection has become an accepted approach to gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with acceptable early results published in the literature. Long-term recurrence rates, however, are still unclear, and the management of tumors in challenging locations requires exploration.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing a laparoscopic resection of gastric GIST in our institution between November 1997 and July 2004 was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients with 15 tumors were evaluated, 5 of which were located high on the lesser curve. All the patients had an attempted laparoscopic approach, with the following procedures performed: stapled wedge excision (n = 8), excision and manual sewing technique (n = 4), and distal gastrectomy (n = 1). Overall, there was a 15% (n = 2) conversion rate. Lesions found in the fundus and greater curvature areas were easily resected via simple stapled wedge excision. High lesser curve tumors were more difficult to manage and required a combination of methods for complete excision and preservation of the gastrointestinal junction including intraoperative gastroscopy, excision and manual sewing technique, and reconstruction over an esophageal bougie. There were no postoperative complications, and the length of hospital stay was 4.6 +/- 1.9 days. At a median follow-up period of 46.5 months (mean, 37.4 +/- 26 months), one patient experienced a recurrence (18 months postoperatively), with eventual disease-related death.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach to gastric GIST tumors is safe and associated with acceptable short- and intermediate-term results. High lesser curve GISTs can be safely approached laparoscopically using various techniques to ensure an adequate resection margin without compromise of the GE junction.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for a large gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach

We report two cases of large gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the stomach that were successfully treated by hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). Two patients, a 56-year-old woman and a 60-year-old man, were admitted to our department for the treatment of a large submucosal tumor of the stomach. After gastrointestinal endoscopy, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, we suspected that the masses, measuring 7.0 cm and 8.0 cm in diameter, respectively, were GISTs in the stomach. However, preoperatively, we could not rule out the possibility of malignant neoplasms, because they had been bleeding or gradually growing. Hand-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection was safely performed for the diagnosis and treatment of the submucosal tumor of the stomach. The immunohistochemical diagnosis in both patients was GIST of the stomach with intermediate-grade malignancy. HALS may be a good indication for large GISTs of the stomach that are difficult to diagnose preoperatively, whether they are malignant or benign, because it is safe and minimally invasive, promoting rapid recovery.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Activating mutations of KIT or the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene (PDGFRA) have been identified in the vast majority of GISTs. The respective oncoproteins exhibit constitutive tyrosine kinase activity and promote cell growth. KIT and PDGFRA mutations are rarely found in GISTs in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) suggesting that the pathogenesis of GIST in NF1 patients is different from that in non-NF1 patients. Endoscopic diagnosis of GIST is usually difficult. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) is a useful method for the diagnosis of GIST and for the detection of KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor known to inhibit the activities of BCR-ABL, KIT, and PDGFR, is currently being used for the treatment of both chronic myeloid leukemia and metastatic GIST. The clinical response to imatinib therapy correlates with the types of mutations of KIT and PDGFRA, and the determination of KIT and PDGFRA mutations is useful for predicting the effect of imatinib. Resistance to imatinib after an initial response has been reported; secondary point mutations in KIT or PDGFRA that confer imatinib resistance are the most common mechanisms responsible for acquired resistance to imatinib. The continued development of target-specific therapies should increase the probability of cure in most patients with GISTs.

Laparoscopic transgastric tumor-everting resection of the gastric submucosal tumor located near the esophagogastric junction

Local resection of the stomach is suitable for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMT). However, it cannot be easily performed laparoscopically on tumors located near the esophagogastric junction. We have developed a new technique, which is called transgastric tumor-everting resection. To identify the location of the SMT laparoscopically without an oral endoscope, an Indiana ink mark was made prior to the operation. The SMT was everted from the gastrotomy and held by the Mini Loop Retractor II. The gastric mucosa could be observed from gastrotomy, allowing us to confirm that the staple line would not cause deformity of the esophagogastric junction. The lesion was then resected, and the gastrotomy was closed simultaneously using the Endo-GIA Universal. This technique is easy, safe, and useful for the laparoscopic resection of gastric SMTs located on the greater curvature or anterior wall of the fornix, near the esophagogastric junction.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: new progress, new questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are uncommon but important mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. They are occasionally encountered on routine endoscopy examinations, when identification may present a diagnostic dilemma. The malignant form, fortunately rare, is typically aggressive and resistant to treatment. This paper reviews several important advances over the past several years in the diagnosis and treatment of GIST, as well as in understanding of its pathogenesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as the diagnostic measure of choice in the evaluation of submucosal tumors of the GI tract, and EUS criteria have been devised for the identification and characterization of GIST. EUS can also guide needle aspiration of these lesions to obtain diagnostic tissue. The discovery of mutations in a membrane transduction receptor, KIT, has led to greater understanding of the pathogenesis of this tumor and has even provided clues to its cell of origin. Moreover, a unique therapeutic agent, imatinib, has been devised that specifically targets the aberrant KIT receptor and has demonstrated dramatic therapeutic efficacy in this otherwise resistant malignancy. Additional strides have been made in developing consensus definitions for GIST and for their laparoscopic resection.

SUMMARY

Major advances in GIST diagnosis and treatment have occurred during the past several years and have improved the care of patients with all forms of this tumor.

[Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic resction of a duodenal stromal tumor]

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumors are rare and their evolution is dubious. This observation of port site metastasis after laparoscopic resection of a small duodenal stromal tumor would be, to our knowledge, the first case reported in the literature. Several direct and indirect mechanisms were supposed to be involved in the appearance of metastases after laparoscopic surgery, but the risk of dissemination remains badly evaluated on its frequency as well as on its mechanisms.