1
|
Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Lin JX, Reim D, Zheng CH, Borghi F, Cianchi F, Norero E, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, Brower ST, Pernazza G, D'Imporzano S, Azagra JS, Zhou YB, Cao SG, Guerra F, Liu T, Arcuri G, González P, Staderini F, Marano A, Di Nardo D, Parisi A, Huang CM, Tebala GD. Open vs robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis on 1469 patients from the IMIGASTRIC prospective database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:302. [PMID: 37555850 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03032-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative data on D2-robotic gastrectomy (RG) vs D2-open gastrectomy (OG) are lacking in the Literature. Aim of this paper is to compare RG to OG with a focus on D2-lymphadenectomy. STUDY DESIGN Data of patients undergoing D2-OG or RG for gastric cancer were retrieved from the international IMIGASTRIC prospective database and compared. RESULTS A total of 1469 patients were selected for inclusion in the study. After 1:1 propensity score matching, a total of 580 patients were matched and included in the final analysis, 290 in each group, RG vs OG. RG had longer operation time (210 vs 330 min, p < 0.0001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (155 vs 119.7 ml, p < 0.0001), time to liquid diet (4.4 vs 3 days, p < 0.0001) and to peristalsis (2.4 vs 2 days, p < 0.0001), and length of postoperative stay (11 vs 8 days, p < 0.0001). Morbidity rate was higher in OG (24.1% vs 16.2%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION RG significantly expedites recovery and reduces the risk of complications compared to OG. However, long-term survival is similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Daniel Reim
- Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Chirurgie, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Felice Borghi
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce E Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Fabio Cianchi
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Careggi" Hospital, University of Florence, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Enrique Norero
- Esophagogastric Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, 8207257, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ninh T Nguyen
- Irvine Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of California, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Feng Qi
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Division of General and Emergency Surgery, School of Robotic Surgery, "Misericordia" Hospital, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cesari
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital of Città Di Castello, USL1 Umbria, 06012, Città Di Castello, Italy
| | - Francesca Bazzocchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Orhan Alimoglu
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, 34000, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Steven T Brower
- Department of Surgical Oncology and HPB Surgery, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, NJ, 07631, USA
| | - Graziano Pernazza
- Robotic General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, 00184, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone D'Imporzano
- Esophageal Surgery Unit, Tuscany Regional Referral Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Disease, Medical University of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Juan-Santiago Azagra
- Unité Des Maladies de L'Appareil Digestif Et Endocrine, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 1210, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Yan-Bing Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Shou-Gen Cao
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Francesco Guerra
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Division of General and Emergency Surgery, School of Robotic Surgery, "Misericordia" Hospital, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Tong Liu
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China
| | - Giacomo Arcuri
- Division of Surgery, "S.Maria Della Misericordia" Hospital, 06129, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paulina González
- Esophagogastric Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, 8207257, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fabio Staderini
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Careggi" Hospital, University of Florence, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Marano
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce E Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Giovanni Domenico Tebala
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, 05100, Terni, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cirocchi R, Cicoletti M, Arcangeli F, Tebala GD, Bruzzone P, Avenia S, Poli G, Trastulli S, Matteucci M. Preliminary Study of Axillary Lymphatic Drainage in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59:1357. [PMID: 37629647 PMCID: PMC10456326 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Background: The axilla is a region of fundamental importance for the implications during oncological surgery, and there are many classifications of axillary lymph node subdivision: on the basis of studies on women with breast cancer, we used Clough's and Li's classification. However, currently we do not have a gold-standard classification regarding axillary lymphatic drainage in melanoma patients. Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate how these classifications could be adapted to sentinel lymph node evaluation in skin-melanoma patients and to look for a possible correlation between the most recent classifications of axillary lymph node location and Oeslner's classification, one of the most common anatomical classifications still widespread today. Methods: We analyzed data from 21 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy between January 2021 and January 2022. Results: Our study demonstrates that, to an extent, there is a possible difference in the use of the various classifications, hinting at possible limits of each. The data we obtained underline how cutaneous melanoma presents extremely heterogenous lymphatic drainage at the level of the axillary cavity. However, the limited data in our possession do not allow us to obtain, at the moment, results that are statistically significant, although we are continuing to enroll patients and collect data. Conclusions: Results of this study support the evidence that the common classifications used for breast cancer do not seem to be exhaustive. Therefore, a specific axillary lymph node classification is necessary in skin melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy; (R.C.); (S.A.)
| | - Michela Cicoletti
- Dermatologic Clinic, S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy; (M.C.); (F.A.)
| | - Fabrizio Arcangeli
- Dermatologic Clinic, S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy; (M.C.); (F.A.)
| | - Giovanni D. Tebala
- Department of Surgery, S. Maria Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (G.D.T.); (S.T.)
| | - Paolo Bruzzone
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Avenia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy; (R.C.); (S.A.)
| | - Giulia Poli
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy;
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Surgery, S. Maria Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (G.D.T.); (S.T.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tebala GD, Di Cintio A, Ricci F, Avenia S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Di Nardo D, Di Saverio S, Gemini A, Ranucci MC, Trastulli S, Cianchi F, Scatizzi M, Catena F. Primary Tumour Treatment in Stage 4 Colorectal Cancer with Unresectable Liver and Lung Metastases and No Peritoneal Carcinomatosis-Current Trends and Attitudes in the Absence of Clear Guidelines. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103499. [PMID: 37240604 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of the primary tumour in colorectal cancer with unresectable liver and/or lung metastases but no peritoneal carcinomatosis is still a matter of debate. In the absence of clear evidence and guidelines, our survey was aimed at obtaining a snapshot of the current attitudes and the rationales for the choice of offering resection of the primary tumour (RPT) despite the presence of untreatable metastases. METHODS An online survey was administered to medical professionals worldwide. The survey had three sections: (1) demographics of the respondent, (2) case scenarios and (3) general questions. For each respondent, an "elective resection score" and an "emergency resection score" were calculated as a percentage of the times he or she would offer RPT in the elective and in the emergency case scenarios. They were correlated to independent variables such as age, type of affiliation and specific workload. RESULTS Most respondents would offer palliative chemotherapy as the first choice in elective scenarios, while a more aggressive approach with RPT would be reserved for younger patients with good performance status and in emergency situations. Respondents younger than 50 years old and those with a specific workload of fewer than 40 cases of colorectal cancer per year tend to be more conservative. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of clear guidelines and evidence, there is a lack of consensus on the treatment of the primary tumour in case of colon cancer with unresectable liver and/or lung metastases and no peritoneal carcinomatosis. Palliative chemotherapy seems to be the first option, but more consistent evidence is needed to guide this choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Di Cintio
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Stefano Avenia
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, "Madonna del Soccorso" Hospital, 63074 San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gemini
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Ranucci
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, "S. Maria" Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Fabio Cianchi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, "Careggi" University Hospital, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- Department of General Surgery, "S. Maria Annunziata e Serratori" Hospital, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, "Maurizio Bufalini" Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Afzal B, Cirocchi R, Dawani A, Desiderio J, Di Cintio A, Di Nardo D, Farinacci F, Fung J, Gemini A, Guerci L, Kam SYM, Lakunina S, Madi L, Mazzetti S, Nadyrshine B, Shams O, Ranucci MC, Ricci F, Sharmin A, Trastulli S, Yasin T, Bond-Smith G, Tebala GD. Is it possible to predict the severity of acute appendicitis? Reliability of predictive models based on easily available blood variables. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:10. [PMID: 36707812 PMCID: PMC9882741 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00478-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent evidence confirms that the treatment of acute appendicitis is not necessarily surgical, and selected patients with uncomplicated appendicitis can benefit from a non-operative management. Unfortunately, no cost-effective test has been proven to be able to effectively predict the degree of appendicular inflammation as yet, therefore, patient selection is too often left to the personal choice of the emergency surgeon. Our paper aims to clarify if basic and readily available blood tests can give reliable prognostic information to build up predictive models to help the decision-making process. METHODS Clinical notes of 2275 patients who underwent an appendicectomy with a presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis were reviewed, taking into consideration basic preoperative blood tests and histology reports on the surgical specimens. Variables were compared with univariate and multivariate analysis, and predictive models were created. RESULTS 18.2% of patients had a negative appendicectomy, 9.6% had mucosal only inflammation, 53% had transmural inflammation and 19.2% had gangrenous appendicitis. A strong correlation was found between degree of inflammation and lymphocytes count and CRP/Albumin ratio, both at univariate and multivariate analysis. A predictive model to identify cases of gangrenous appendicitis was developed. CONCLUSION Low lymphocyte count and high CRP/Albumin ratio combined into a predictive model may have a role in the selection of patients who deserve appendicectomy instead of non-operative management of acute appendicitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barza Afzal
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Aruna Dawani
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Cintio
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Federico Farinacci
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - James Fung
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alessandro Gemini
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Guerci
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Sen Yin Melina Kam
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Svetlana Lakunina
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Lee Madi
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Stefano Mazzetti
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Bakhtiar Nadyrshine
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ola Shams
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Chiara Ranucci
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricci
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Afroza Sharmin
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Tanzela Yasin
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Giles Bond-Smith
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Giovanni D. Tebala
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK ,grid.416377.00000 0004 1760 672XDigestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S.Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Desiderio J, Sagnotta A, Terrenato I, Garofoli E, Mosillo C, Trastulli S, Arteritano F, Tozzi F, D'Andrea V, Fong Y, Woo Y, Bracarda S, Parisi A. Long-term survival of patients with stage II and III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with inadequate nodal assessment. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1463-1483. [PMID: 34950434 PMCID: PMC8649557 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is an aggressive disease with frequent lymph node (LN) involvement. The NCCN recommends a D2 lymphadenectomy and the harvesting of at least 16 LNs. This threshold has been the subject of great debate, not only for the extent of surgery but also for more appropriate staging. The reclassification of stage IIB through IIIC based on N3b nodal staging in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system highlights the efforts to more accurately discriminate survival expectancy based on nodal number. Furthermore, studies have suggested that pathologic assessment of 30 or more LNs improve prognostic accuracy and is required for proper staging of gastric cancer.
AIM To evaluate the long-term survival of advanced gastric cancer patients who deviated from expected survival curves because of inadequate nodal evaluation.
METHODS Eligible patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Those with stage II–III gastric cancer were considered for inclusion. Three groups were compared based on the number of analyzed LNs. They were inadequate LN assessment (ILA, < 16 LNs), adequate LN assessment (ALA, 16-29 LNs), and optimal LN assessment (OLA, ≥ 30 LNs). The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival. Data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, log-rank test, hazard risk, and Cox proportional univariate and multivariate models. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the ALA and OLA groups.
RESULTS The analysis included 11607 patients. Most had advanced T stages (T3 = 48%; T4 = 42%). The pathological AJCC stage distribution was IIA = 22%, IIB = 18%, IIIA = 26%, IIIB = 22%, and IIIC = 12%. The overall sample divided by the study objective included ILA (50%), ALA (35%), and OLA (15%). Median OS was 24 mo for the ILA group, 29 mo for the ALA group, and 34 mo for the OLA group (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that the ALA and OLA groups had better OS than the ILA group [ALA hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79–0.88, P < 0.001 and OLA HR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.68–0.79, P < 0.001]. The OS outcome was confirmed by multivariate analysis (ALA HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.64–0.71, P < 0.001 and OLA: HR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.44–0.52, P < 0.001). A 1:1 PSM analysis in 3428 patients found that the OLA group had better survival than the ALA group (OS: OLA median = 34 mo vs ALA median = 26 mo, P < 0.001, which was confirmed by univariate analysis (HR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.75–0.89, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis: (HR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.65–0.78, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION Proper nodal staging is a critical issue in gastric cancer. Assessment of an inadequate number of LNs places patients at high risk of adverse long-term survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary’s Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Andrea Sagnotta
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome 00135, Italy
| | - Irene Terrenato
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatic Unit, Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Eleonora Garofoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Mary’s Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | - Claudia Mosillo
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Mary’s Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary’s Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | | | - Federico Tozzi
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, United States
| | - Vito D'Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Yuman Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, LA, 91010, United States
| | - Yanghee Woo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, LA, 91010, United States
| | - Sergio Bracarda
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Mary’s Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary’s Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trastulli S, Munzi G, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Rossi M, Parisi A. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography versus standard intraoperative methods for prevention of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:359-372. [PMID: 33778848 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of anastomotic blood perfusion with intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) may be effective in preventing anastomotic leak compared with standard intraoperative methods in colorectal surgery. METHODS MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs and observational studies on intraoperative ICG-FA to May 2020. Odds ratios (ORs), risk differences and mean differences (MDs) were calculated with 95 per cent c.i. based on intention-to-treat analysis. The number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome was also estimated. RESULTS Twenty-five comparative studies included a total of 7735 patients. The use of intraoperative ICG fluorescence angiography was linked with a significant reduction in all grades anastomotic leak (OR 0.39 (95 per cent c.i. 0.31 to 0.49), P < 0.001; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 23) and length of hospital stay (MD -0.72 (95 per cent c.i. -1.22 to -0.21) days, P = 0.006). A significantly lower incidence of grade A (OR 0.33 (0.18 to 0.60), P < 0.001), grade B (OR 0.58 (0.35 to 0.97), P = 0.04) and grade C (OR 0.59 (0.38 to 0.92), P = 0.02) anastomotic leak was demonstrated in favour of ICG-FA. For low or ultra-low rectal resection, the odds of developing anastomotic leakage was 0.32 (0.23 to 0.45) (P < 0.001; NNTB 14). There were no differences in duration of surgery, and no adverse events related to ICG fluorescent injection. CONCLUSION The use of ICG-FA instead of standard intraoperative methods to assess anastomosis blood perfusion in colorectal surgery leads to a significant reduction in anastomotic leakage and in the need for surgical reintervention for anastomotic leak, especially in patients with low or ultra-low rectal resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Trastulli
- Department of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - G Munzi
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, St Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy.,Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - J Desiderio
- Department of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, St Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - M Rossi
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - A Parisi
- Department of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cirocchi R, Sutera M, Fedeli P, Anania G, Covarelli P, Suadoni F, Boselli C, Carlini L, Trastulli S, D'Andrea V, Bruzzone P. Authors' Reply: Ilioinguinal Nerve Neurectomy is better than Preservation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 2021; 45:2631-2632. [PMID: 34031712 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06167-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Marco Sutera
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Perugia, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Fedeli
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Perugia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Gabriele Anania
- Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Piero Covarelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fabio Suadoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlo Boselli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luigi Carlini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Vito D'Andrea
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Perugia, Italy
- Department of Surgical Science, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Bruzzone
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Perugia, Italy
- Dipartimento Di Chirurgia Generale E Specialistica "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Desiderio J, Sagnotta A, Terrenato I, Annibale B, Trastulli S, Tozzi F, D'Andrea V, Bracarda S, Garofoli E, Fong Y, Woo Y, Parisi A. Gastrectomy for stage IV gastric cancer: a comparison of different treatment strategies from the SEER database. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7150. [PMID: 33785761 PMCID: PMC8010081 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86352-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In the West, more than one third of newly diagnosed subjects show metastatic disease in gastric cancer (mGC) with few care options available. Gastrectomy has recently become a subject of debate, with some evidence showing advantages in survival beyond the sole purpose of treatment tumor-related complications. We investigated the survival benefit of different strategies in mGC patients, focusing on the role and timing of gastrectomy. Data were extracted from the SEER database. Groups were determined according to whether patients received gastrectomy, chemotherapy, supportive care. Patients receiving a multimodality treatment were further divided according to timing of surgery, whether performed before (primary gastrectomy, PG) or after chemotherapy (secondary gastrectomy, SG). 16,596 patients were included. Median OS was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the SG (15 months) than in the PG (13 months), gastrectomy alone (6 months), and chemotherapy (7 months) groups. In the multivariate analysis, SG showed better OS (HR = 0.22, 95%CI = 0.18-0.26, p < 0.001) than PG (HR = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.23-0.28, p < 0.001), gastrectomy (HR = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.36-0.44, p < 0.001), and chemotherapy (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.4-0.44, p < 0.001). The survival benefits persisted even after the PSM analysis. This study shows survival advantages of gastrectomy as multimodality strategy after chemotherapy. In selected patients, SG can be proposed to improve the management of stage IV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100, Terni, Italy.
- Department of Surgical Sciences - PhD Program in Advanced Surgical Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea Sagnotta
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Irene Terrenato
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatic Unit, Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Annibale
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Federico Tozzi
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Vito D'Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences - PhD Program in Advanced Surgical Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Bracarda
- Medical and Translational Oncology, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Eleonora Garofoli
- Medical and Translational Oncology, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Yuman Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yanghee Woo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cirocchi R, Sutera M, Fedeli P, Anania G, Covarelli P, Suadoni F, Boselli C, Carlini L, Trastulli S, D'Andrea V, Bruzzone P. Ilioinguinal Nerve Neurectomy is better than Preservation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 2021; 45:1750-1760. [PMID: 33606079 PMCID: PMC8093155 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-05968-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of chronic groin pain (primary outcome) and alterations of sensitivity (secondary outcome) after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair, comparing neurectomy with ilioinguinal nerve preservation surgery. The exact cause of chronic groin postoperative pain after mesh inguinal hernia repair is usually unclear. Section of the ilioinguinal nerve (neurectomy) may reduce postoperative chronic pain. METHODS We followed PRISMA guidelines to identify randomized studies reporting comparative outcomes of neurectomy versus ilioinguinal nerve preservation surgery during Lichtenstein hernia repairs. Studies were identified by searching in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from April 2020. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was submitted and accepted from PROSPERO: CRD420201610. RESULTS In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 16 RCTs were included and 1550 patients were evaluated: 756 patients underwent neurectomy (neurectomy group) vs 794 patients underwent ilioinguinal nerve preservation surgery (nerve preservation group). All included studies analyzed Lichtenstein hernia repair. The majority of the new studies and data comes from a relatively narrow geographic region; other bias of this meta-analysis is the suitability of pooling data for many of these studies. A statistically significant percentage of patients with prosthetic inguinal hernia repair had reduced groin pain at 6 months after surgery at 8.94% (38/425) in the neurectomy group versus 25.11% (113/450) in the nerve preservation group [relative risk (RR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28-0.54; Z = 5.60 (P < 0.00001)]. Neurectomy did not significantly increase the groin paresthesia 6 months after surgery at 8.5% (30/353) in the neurectomy group versus 4.5% (17/373) in the nerve preservation group [RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.94-2.80; Z = 1.74 (P = 0.08)]. At 12 months after surgery, there is no advantage of neurectomy over chronic groin pain; no significant differences were found in the 12-month postoperative groin pain rate at 9% (9/100) in the neurectomy group versus 17.85% (20/112) in the inguinal nerve preservation group [RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.05; Z = 1.83 (P = 0.07)]. One study (115 patients) reported data about paresthesia at 12 months after surgery (7.27%, 4/55 in neurectomy group vs. 5%, 3/60 in nerve preservation group) and results were not significantly different between the two groups [RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.34, 6.21;Z = 0.51 (P = 0.61)]. The subgroup analysis of the studies that identified the IIN showed a significant reduction of the 6th month evaluation of pain in both groups and confirmed the same trend in favor of neurectomy reported in the previous overall analysis: statistically significant reduction of pain 6 months after surgery at 3.79% (6/158) in the neurectomy group versus 14.6% (26/178) in the nerve preservation group [RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.63; Z = 3.10 (P = 0.002)]. CONCLUSION Ilioinguinal nerve identification in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is the fundamental step to reduce or avoid postoperative pain. Prophylactic ilioinguinal nerve neurectomy seems to offer some advantages concerning pain in the first 6th month postoperative period, although it might be possible that the small number of cases contributed to the insignificancy regarding paresthesia and hypoesthesia. Nowadays, prudent surgeons should discuss with patients and their families the uncertain benefits and the potential risks of neurectomy before performing the hernioplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Terni, Italy.
| | - Marco Sutera
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Terni, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Fedeli
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Terni, Italy
- School of Law, Legal Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy
| | - Gabriele Anania
- Department of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Piero Covarelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fabio Suadoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlo Boselli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Terni, Italy
| | - Luigi Carlini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Vito D'Andrea
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Terni, Italy
- Department of Surgical Science, Sapienza Università Di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Bruzzone
- Inguinal Nerve Working Group, Terni, Italy
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parisi A, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Trastulli S. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS): a Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2020; 30:5071-5085. [PMID: 32981000 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05000-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to conduct an up-to-date systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the benefits and harms of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme in bariatric surgery. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs on ERAS versus standard care (SC) until April 2020. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS Five RCTs included a total of 610 procedures. ERAS adoption is capable of significantly reducing LOS (MD of - 0.51; 95% CI - 0.92 to - 0.10; P = 0.01) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.95; P = 0.04). No significant differences in terms of adverse events and readmissions. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of ERAS in bariatric surgery produces a significant reduction in LOS and PONV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Desiderio J, Trastulli S, D'Andrea V, Parisi A. Enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer (ERAS-GC): optimizing patient outcome. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:11. [PMID: 32190779 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.10.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant advances were achieved, in last decades, in the management of surgical patients with gastric cancer. This has led to the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with the objective of reducing the length of hospital stay, accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing the surgical stress. The ERAS protocols have many items, including the pre-operative patient education, early mobilization and feeding starting from the first postoperative day. This review aims to highlight possible advantages on postoperative functional recovery outcomes after gastrectomy in patients undergoing an ERAS program, current lack of evidences and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy.,Department of Surgical Sciences, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Vito D'Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cirocchi R, Morelli U, Arezzo A, Trastulli S, Parisi A, Falconi M, Morino M, Sagar J. Double-stapled anastomosis versus mucosectomy and handsewn anastomosis in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011089.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy 05100
| | - Umberto Morelli
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas - UNICAMP; Department of Colorectal Surgery; Barão Geraldo Campinas, São Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil 13083-887
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- University of Torino; Department of Surgical Sciences; Corso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14 Turin Italy 10126
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy 05100
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Hospital of Terni; Liver Unit and Department of Digestive Surgery; Terni Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Università Politecnica delle Marche A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti; Clinica Chirurgia del Pancreas; Via Conca 71 Torrette DI Ancona Italy 60126
| | - Mario Morino
- University of Turin; Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery; Corso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14 Turin Italy 10126
| | - Jayesh Sagar
- Luton and Dunstable Hospital NHS Trust; Department of Surgery; Lewsey Road Luton UK LU4 0DZ
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abraha I, Aristei C, Palumbo I, Lupattelli M, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, De Florio R, Valentini V. Preoperative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localised rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD002102. [PMID: 30284239 PMCID: PMC6517113 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002102.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an update of the original review published in 2007.Carcinoma of the rectum is a common malignancy, especially in high income countries. Local recurrence may occur after surgery alone. Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) has the potential to reduce the risk of local recurrence and improve outcomes in rectal cancer. OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of preoperative radiotherapy for people with localised resectable rectal cancer compared to surgery alone. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library; Issue 5, 2018) (4 June 2018), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1950 to 4 June 2018), and Embase (Ovid) (1974 to 4 June 2018). We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant ongoing trials (4 June 2018). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing PRT and surgery with surgery alone for people with localised advanced rectal cancer planned for radical surgery. We excluded trials that did not use contemporary radiotherapy techniques (with more than two fields to the pelvis). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the 'Risk of bias' domains for each included trial, and extracted data. For time-to-event data, we calculated the Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) and variances, and for dichotomous data we calculated risk ratios (RR) using the random-effects method. Potential sources of heterogeneity hypothesised a priori included study quality, staging, and the use of total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. MAIN RESULTS We included four trials with a total of 4663 participants. All four trials reported short PRT courses, with three trials using 25 Gy in five fractions, and one trial using 20 Gy in four fractions. Only one study specifically required TME surgery for inclusion, whereas in another study 90% of participants received TME surgery.Preoperative radiotherapy probably reduces overall mortality at 4 to 12 years' follow-up (4 trials, 4663 participants; Peto OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.98; moderate-quality evidence). For every 1000 people who undergo surgery alone, 454 would die compared with 45 fewer (the true effect may lie between 77 fewer to 9 fewer) in the PRT group. There was some evidence from subgroup analyses that in trials using TME no or little effect of PRT on survival (P = 0.03 for the difference between subgroups).Preoperative radiotherapy may have little or no effect in reducing cause-specific mortality for rectal cancer (2 trials, 2145 participants; Peto OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03; low-quality evidence).We found moderate-quality evidence that PRT reduces local recurrence (4 trials, 4663 participants; Peto OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.57). In absolute terms, 161 out of 1000 patients receiving surgery alone would experience local recurrence compared with 83 fewer with PRT. The results were consistent in TME and non-TME studies.There may be little or no difference in curative resection (4 trials, 4673 participants; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02; low-quality evidence) or in the need for sphincter-sparing surgery (3 trials, 4379 participants; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.04; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence) between PRT and surgery alone.Low-quality evidence suggests that PRT may increase the risk of sepsis from 13% to 16% (2 trials, 2698 participants; RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.52) and surgical complications from 25% to 30% (2 trials, 2698 participants; RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42) compared to surgery alone.Two trials evaluated quality of life using different scales. Both studies concluded that sexual dysfunction occurred more in the PRT group. Mixed results were found for faecal incontinence, and irradiated participants tended to resume work later than non-irradiated participants between 6 and 12 months, but this effect had attenuated after 18 months (low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found moderate-quality evidence that PRT reduces overall mortality. Subgroup analysis did not confirm this effect in people undergoing TME surgery. We found consistent evidence that PRT reduces local recurrence. Risk of sepsis and postsurgical complications may be higher with PRT.The main limitation of the findings of the present review concerns their applicability. The included trials only assessed short-course radiotherapy and did not use chemotherapy, which is widely used in the contemporary management of rectal cancer disease. The differences between the trials regarding the criteria used to define rectal cancer, staging, radiotherapy delivered, the time between radiotherapy and surgery, and the use of adjuvant or postoperative therapy did not appear to influence the size of effect across the studies.Future trials should focus on identifying participants that are most likely to benefit from PRT especially in terms of improving local control, sphincter preservation, and overall survival while reducing acute and late toxicities (especially rectal and sexual function), as well as determining the effect of radiotherapy when chemotherapy is used and the optimal timing of surgery following radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iosief Abraha
- Regional Health Authority of UmbriaHealth Planning ServicePerugiaItaly06124
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- University of Perugia and Perugia General HospitalRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical SciencePerugiaItaly
| | - Isabella Palumbo
- University of Perugia and Perugia General HospitalRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical SciencePerugiaItaly
| | | | | | | | - Rita De Florio
- Local Health Unit of PerugiaGeneral MedicineAzienda SanitariaLocale USL 1, Medicina GeneralePerugiaItaly
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCSRadiation Oncology DepartmentRomeItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cirocchi R, Randolph J, Montedori A, Cochetti G, Arezzo A, Mearini E, Abraha I, Trastulli S. Staples versus sutures for surgical wound closure in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011250.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy 05100
| | - Justus Randolph
- Mercer University; Georgia Baptist College of Nursing; 3001 Mercer University Dr. Atlanta GA USA 30341
| | - Alessandro Montedori
- Regional Health Authority of Umbria; Health Planning Service; Via Mario Angeloni 61 Perugia Umbria Italy 06124
| | - Giovanni Cochetti
- University of Perugia; Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences; Sant’Andrea delle Fratte Perugia Italy 06100
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- University of Torino; Department of Surgical Sciences; Corso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14 Turin Italy 10126
| | - Ettore Mearini
- University of Perugia; Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences; Sant’Andrea delle Fratte Perugia Italy 06100
| | - Iosief Abraha
- Regional Health Authority of Umbria; Health Planning Service; Via Mario Angeloni 61 Perugia Umbria Italy 06124
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy 05100
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Gemini A, Di Nardo D, Palazzini G, Parisi A, D'Andrea V. Fluorescence image-guided lymphadenectomy using indocyanine green and near infrared technology in robotic gastrectomy. Chin J Cancer Res 2018; 30:568-570. [PMID: 30510369 PMCID: PMC6232360 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, some researchers have tried to find a way to improve the surgical identification of the lymphatic drainage routes and lymph node stations during radical gastrectomy, thus starting a new research frontier in this field called " navigation surgery”. Among the different reported solutions, the introduction of the indocyanine green (ICG) has drawn attention for its characteristics, a fluorescence dye that can be detected in the near infrared spectral band (NIR). A fluorescence imaging technology has been integrated in the latest version of the Da Vinci robotic system and surgeons have extensively reported their experiences in colorectal and hepato-biliary surgery for tumors, vascular and lymphatic structures visualization. However, up to date, the combined use of fluorescence imaging and robotic technology has not been adequately investigated during lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy.,Department of Surgical Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gemini
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Giorgio Palazzini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | - Vito D'Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Parisi A, Ricci F, Gemini A, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Palazzini G, D’Andrea V, Desiderio J. New totally intracorporeal reconstructive approach after robotic total gastrectomy: Technical details and short-term outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:4293-4302. [PMID: 28694670 PMCID: PMC5483504 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Revised: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To show outcomes of our series of patients that underwent a total gastrectomy with a robotic approach and highlight the technical details of a proposed solution for the reconstruction phase.
METHODS Data of gastrectomies performed from May 2014 to October 2016, were extracted and analyzed. Basic characteristics of patients, surgical and clinical outcomes were reported. The technique for reconstruction (Parisi Technique) consists on a loop of bowel shifted up antecolic to directly perform the esophago-enteric anastomosis followed by a second loop, measured up to 40 cm starting from the esojejunostomy, fixed to the biliary limb to create an enteroenteric anastomosis. The continuity between the two anastomoses is interrupted just firing a linear stapler, so obtaining the Roux-en-Y by avoiding to interrupt the mesentery.
RESULTS Fifty-five patients were considered in the present analysis. Estimated blood loss was 126.55 ± 73 mL, no conversions to open surgery occurred, R0 resections were obtained in all cases. Hospital stay was 5 (3-17) d, no anastomotic leakage occurred. Overall, a fast functional recovery was shown with a median of 3 (3-6) d in starting a solid diet.
CONCLUSION Robotic surgery and the adoption of a tailored reconstruction technique have increased the feasibility and safety of a minimally invasive approach for total gastrectomy. The present series of patients shows its implementation in a western center with satisfying short-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Parisi A, Reim D, Borghi F, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A, Cianchi F, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, Gagnière J, Pernazza G, D’Imporzano S, Zhou YB, Azagra JS, Facy O, Brower ST, Jiang ZW, Zang L, Isik A, Gemini A, Trastulli S, Novotny A, Marano A, Liu T, Annecchiarico M, Badii B, Arcuri G, Avanzolini A, Leblebici M, Pezet D, Cao SG, Goergen M, Zhang S, Palazzini G, D’Andrea V, Desiderio J. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:2376-2384. [PMID: 28428717 PMCID: PMC5385404 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer and determine surgical, clinical, and oncological outcomes.
METHODS This is a propensity score-matched case-control study, comparing three treatment arms: robotic gastrectomy (RG), laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), open gastrectomy (OG). Data collection started after sharing a specific study protocol. Data were recorded through a tailored and protected web-based system. Primary outcomes: harvested lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications rate. Among the secondary outcomes, there are: operative time, R0 resections, POD of mobilization, POD of starting liquid diet and soft solid diet. The analysis includes the evaluation of type and grade of postoperative complications. Detailed information of anastomotic leakages is also provided.
RESULTS The present analysis was carried out of 1026 gastrectomies. To guarantee homogenous distribution of cases, patients in the RG, LG and OG groups were 1:1:2 matched using a propensity score analysis with a caliper = 0.2. The successful matching resulted in a total sample of 604 patients (RG = 151; LG = 151; OG = 302). The three groups showed no differences in all baseline patients characteristics, type of surgery (P = 0.42) and stage of the disease (P = 0.16). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LG (95.93 ± 119.22) and RG (117.91 ± 68.11) groups compared to the OG (127.26 ± 79.50, P = 0.002). The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar between the RG (27.78 ± 11.45), LG (24.58 ± 13.56) and OG (25.82 ± 12.07) approach. A benefit in favor of the minimally invasive approaches was found in the length of hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A similar complications rate was found (P = 0.13). The leakage rate was not different (P = 0.78) between groups.
CONCLUSION Laparoscopic and robotic surgery can be safely performed and proposed as possible alternative to open surgery. The main highlighted benefit is a faster postoperative functional recovery.
Collapse
|
18
|
Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Grandone I, Fontana L, Paolini L, Altomare M, D'Angelo P, Palazzi M, Cirocchi R, Leotta S, Fatati G, Parisi A. Rationale and design of the Early Sleeve gastrectomy In New Onset Diabetic Obese Patients (ESINODOP) trial. Endocrine 2017; 55:748-753. [PMID: 27259508 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-016-0996-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
No randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have yet evaluated the bariatric surgery's efficacy and safety in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this multicenter RCT is to compare bariatric surgery, particularly laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), with conventional medical therapy (CMT) in obese patients (body mass index between 30 and 42 kg/m2) newly diagnosed with T2DM and without any diabetes-related complications at any stage. A total of 100 eligible patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to undergo one of the two planned treatments and will be followed for at least 6 years after randomization. The main objective of the ESINODOP trial is to investigate the efficacy of LSG compared with CMT alone in inducing and maintaining a remission of T2DM (defined as HbA1c levels ≤6.0 %, without active pharmacologic therapy after 1 year). The remission of T2DM will also be evaluated with the criteria provided by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), and the additional parameters such as adverse event rates, micro- and macrovascular complications, weight loss, gastrointestinal hormones, and quality of life will be compared. The study started on September 2015 and the planned recruitment period is 3 years. Patient recruitment and follow-up take place in the two diabetology and nutrition centers participating in the study, which are performed on a national basis. The ESINODOP trial is designed with the intent of comparing the efficacy of CMT alone to that of CMT in conjunction with LSG performed at the time of diabetes diagnosis in mildly obese diabetic patients. Currently, patients with these characteristics are not eligible for bariatric/metabolic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, Santa Maria Hospital, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100, Terni, Italy.
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, Santa Maria Hospital, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100, Terni, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ilenia Grandone
- Department of Diabetology, Dietology and Clinical Nutrition, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Lucia Fontana
- Department of Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Paolini
- Department of Diabetology, Dietology and Clinical Nutrition, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Maria Altomare
- Department of Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola D'Angelo
- Department of Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Palazzi
- Department of Diabetology, Dietology and Clinical Nutrition, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, Santa Maria Hospital, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100, Terni, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sergio Leotta
- Department of Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fatati
- Department of Diabetology, Dietology and Clinical Nutrition, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, Santa Maria Hospital, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Parisi A, Trastulli S, Ricci F, Cirocchi R, Pironi D, Santoro A, Desiderio J. Robotic double-loop reconstruction method following total gastrectomy. Endoscopy 2016; 48 Suppl 1 UCTN:E55-6. [PMID: 26890541 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Daniele Pironi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Santoro
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Parisi A, Trastulli S, Ricci F, Regina R, Cirocchi R, Grassi V, Gemini A, Pironi D, D'Andrea V, Santoro A, Desiderio J. Analysis of long-term results after liver surgery for metastases from colorectal and non-colorectal tumors: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2016; 30:25-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
21
|
Parisi A, Ricci F, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Gemini A, Grassi V, Corsi A, Renzi C, De Santis F, Petrina A, Pironi D, D'Andrea V, Santoro A, Desiderio J. Robotic Total Gastrectomy With Intracorporeal Robot-Sewn Anastomosis: A Novel Approach Adopting the Double-Loop Reconstruction Method. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e1922. [PMID: 26656323 PMCID: PMC5008468 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000001922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer constitutes a major health problem. Robotic surgery has been progressively developed in this field. Although the feasibility of robotic procedures has been demonstrated, there are unresolved aspects being debated, including the reproducibility of intracorporeal in place of extracorporeal anastomosis.Difficulties of traditional laparoscopy have been described and there are well-known advantages of robotic systems, but few articles in literature describe a full robotic execution of the reconstructive phase while others do not give a thorough explanation how this phase was run.A new reconstructive approach, not yet described in literature, was recently adopted at our Center.Robotic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and a so-called "double-loop" reconstruction method with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis (Parisi's technique) was performed in all reported cases.Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and a technical note was documented.All tumors were located at the upper third of the stomach, and no conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. Histopathological analysis showed R0 resection obtained in all specimens. Hospital stay was regular in all patients and discharge was recommended starting from the 4th postoperative day. No major postoperative complications or reoperations occurred.Reconstruction of the digestive tract after total gastrectomy is one of the main areas of surgical research in the treatment of gastric cancer and in the field of minimally invasive surgery.The double-loop method is a valid simplification of the traditional technique of construction of the Roux-limb that could increase the feasibility and safety in performing a full hand-sewn intracorporeal reconstruction and it appears to fit the characteristics of the robotic system thus obtaining excellent postoperative clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amilcare Parisi
- From the Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni (AP, JD, ST, RC, FR, VG); Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia (AC, CR, AG, FDS, AP); and Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (DP, VD, AS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Desiderio J, Jiang ZW, Nguyen NT, Zhang S, Reim D, Alimoglu O, Azagra JS, Yu PW, Coburn NG, Qi F, Jackson PG, Zang L, Brower ST, Kurokawa Y, Facy O, Tsujimoto H, Coratti A, Annecchiarico M, Bazzocchi F, Avanzolini A, Gagniere J, Pezet D, Cianchi F, Badii B, Novotny A, Eren T, Leblebici M, Goergen M, Zhang B, Zhao YL, Liu T, Al-Refaie W, Ma J, Takiguchi S, Lequeu JB, Trastulli S, Parisi A. Robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric cancer compared on surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes: a multi-institutional chart review. A study protocol of the International study group on Minimally Invasive surgery for GASTRIc Cancer-IMIGASTRIC. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008198. [PMID: 26482769 PMCID: PMC4611863 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastric cancer represents a great challenge for healthcare providers and requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach in which surgery plays a major role. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively developed, first with the advent of laparoscopy and recently with the spread of robotic surgery, but a number of issues are currently being debated, including the limitations in performing an effective extended lymph node dissection, the real advantages of robotic systems, the role of laparoscopy for Advanced Gastric Cancer, the reproducibility of a total intracorporeal technique and the oncological results achievable during long-term follow-up. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multi-institutional international database will be established to evaluate the role of robotic, laparoscopic and open approaches in gastric cancer, comprising of information regarding surgical, clinical and oncological features. A chart review will be conducted to enter data of participants with gastric cancer, previously treated at the participating institutions. The database is the first of its kind, through an international electronic submission system and a HIPPA protected real time data repository from high volume gastric cancer centres. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is conducted in compliance with ethical principles originating from the Helsinki Declaration, within the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and relevant laws/regulations. A multicentre study with a large number of patients will permit further investigation of the safety and efficacy as well as the long-term outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and open approaches for the management of gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02325453; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Zhi-Wei Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ninh T Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
| | - Shu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Daniel Reim
- Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Orhan Alimoglu
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Juan-Santiago Azagra
- Unité des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif et Endocrine (UMADE), Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Pei-Wu Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Third Military Medical University Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Natalie G Coburn
- Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Feng Qi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Patrick G Jackson
- Division of General Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Lu Zang
- Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Steven T Brower
- Department of Surgical Oncology and HPB Surgery, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, New Jersey, USA
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Olivier Facy
- Service de chirurgie digestive et cancérologique CHU Bocage. Dijon, France
| | - Hironori Tsujimoto
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mario Annecchiarico
- Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Bazzocchi
- Department of General Surgery, Division of General, Gastroenterologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, GB Morgagni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Andrea Avanzolini
- Department of General Surgery, Division of General, Gastroenterologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, GB Morgagni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Johan Gagniere
- Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, University of Auvergne, University Hospital Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Denis Pezet
- Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, University of Auvergne, University Hospital Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Fabio Cianchi
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Center of Oncological Minimally Invasive Surgery (COMIS), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetta Badii
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Center of Oncological Minimally Invasive Surgery (COMIS), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alexander Novotny
- Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Tunc Eren
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Metin Leblebici
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Martine Goergen
- Unité des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif et Endocrine (UMADE), Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Ben Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Third Military Medical University Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong-Liang Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Third Military Medical University Southwest Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Tong Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Waddah Al-Refaie
- Division of General Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA
| | - Junjun Ma
- Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuji Takiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Boselli C, Barberini F, Listorti C, Castellani E, Renzi C, Corsi A, Grassi V, Cacurri A, Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Santoro A, Pironi D, Burattini F, Cirocchi R, Avenia N, Noya G, Parisi A. Distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation: A short-term outcome analysis of the Warshaw technique. Int J Surg 2015; 21 Suppl 1:S40-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Revised: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
24
|
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Pressi E, Farinella E, Avenia S, Morales Uribe CH, Botero AM, Barrera LM. Non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD010989. [PMID: 26301722 PMCID: PMC9250243 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010989.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery used to be the treatment of choice in cases of blunt hepatic injury, but this approach gradually changed over the last two decades as increasing non-operative management (NOM) of splenic injury led to its use for hepatic injury. The improvement in critical care monitoring and computed tomographic scanning, as well as the more frequent use of interventional radiology techniques, has helped to bring about this change to non-operative management. Liver trauma ranges from a small capsular tear, without parenchymal laceration, to massive parenchymal injury with major hepatic vein/retrohepatic vena cava lesions. In 1994, the Organ Injury Scaling Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) revised the Hepatic Injury Scale to have a range from grade I to VI. Minor injuries (grade I or II) are the most frequent liver injuries (80% to 90% of all cases); severe injuries are grade III-V lesions; grade VI lesions are frequently incompatible with survival. In the medical literature, the majority of patients who have undergone NOM have low-grade liver injuries. The safety of NOM in high-grade liver lesions, AAST grade IV and V, remains a subject of debate as a high incidence of liver and collateral extra-abdominal complications are still described. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of non-operative management compared to operative management in high-grade (grade III-V) blunt hepatic injury. SEARCH METHODS The search for studies was run on 14 April 2014. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, The Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase Classic+Embase (Ovid), PubMed, ISI WOS (SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S & CPSI-SSH), clinical trials registries, conference proceedings, and we screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised trials that compare non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently applied the selection criteria to relevant study reports. We used standard methodological procedures as defined by the Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS We were unable to find any randomised controlled trials of non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In order to further explore the preliminary findings provided by animal models and observational clinical studies that suggests there may be a beneficial effect of non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury, large, high quality randomised trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- University of PerugiaDepartment of General SurgeryTerniItaly05100
| | | | - Eleonora Pressi
- Liver Unit and Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital of TerniTerniItaly
| | - Eriberto Farinella
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation TrustGeneral and Colorectal Surgery369 Fulham RoadLondonUKSW10 9NH
| | - Stefano Avenia
- University of PerugiaDepartment of General SurgeryTerniItaly05100
| | | | - Ana Maria Botero
- Universidad de AntioquiaDepartment of General SurgeryCarrera 38 No 6 B Sur 25 Apto 1102MedellínAntioquiaColombia574
| | - Luis M Barrera
- Universidad de AntioquiaDepartment of General SurgeryCarrera 38 No 6 B Sur 25 Apto 1102MedellínAntioquiaColombia574
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Randolph J, Guarino S, Di Rocco G, Arezzo A, D'Andrea V, Santoro A, Barczyñski M, Avenia N. Total or near-total thyroidectomy versus subtotal thyroidectomy for multinodular non-toxic goitre in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD010370. [PMID: 26252202 PMCID: PMC9587693 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010370.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total thyroidectomy (TT) and subtotal thyroidectomy (ST) are worldwide treatment options for multinodular non-toxic goitre in adults. Near TT, defined as a postoperative thyroid remnant less than 1 mL, is supposed to be a similarly effective but safer option than TT. ST has been shown to be marginally safer than TT, but it may leave an undetected thyroid cancer in place. OBJECTIVES The objective was to assess the effects of total or near-total thyroidectomy compared to subtotal thyroidectomy for multinodular non-toxic goitre. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, as well as the ICTRP Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search was 18 June 2015 for all databases. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA Two review authors independently scanned the abstract, title or both sections of every record retrieved to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on thyroidectomy for multinodular non-toxic goitre for further assessment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed studies for risk of bias and evaluated overall study quality utilising the GRADE instrument. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. A random-effects model was used for pooling data. MAIN RESULTS We examined 1430 records, scrutinized 14 full-text publications and included four RCTs. Altogether 1305 participants entered the four trials, 543 participants were randomised to TT and 762 participants to ST. A total of 98% and 97% of participants finished the trials in the TT and ST groups, respectively. Two trials had a duration of follow-up between 12 and 39 months and two trials a follow-up of 5 and 10 years, respectively. Risk of bias across studies was mainly unknown for selection, performance and detection bias. Attrition bias was generally low and reporting bias high for some outcomes. In the short-term postoperative period no deaths were reported for both TT and ST groups. However, longer-term data on all-cause mortality were not reported (1284 participants; 4 trials; moderate quality evidence). Goiter recurrence was lower in the TT group compared to ST. Goiters recurred in 0.2% (1/425) of the TT group compared to 8.4% (53/632) of the ST group (OR 0.05 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.21); P < 0.0001; 1057 participants; 3 trials; moderate quality evidence). Re-intervention due to goitre recurrence was lower in the TT group compared to ST. Re-intervention was necessary in 0.5% (1/191) of TT patients compared to 0.8% (3/379)of ST patients (OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.07 to 6.38); P = 0.72; 570 participants; 1 trial; low quality evidence). The incidence of permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was lower for ST compared with TT. Permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 0.8% (6/741) of ST patients compared to 0.7% (4/543) of TT patients (OR 1.28, (95% CI 0.38 to 4.36); P = 0.69; 1275 participants; 4 trials; low quality evidence). The incidence of permanent hypoparathyroidism was lower for ST compared with TT. Permanent hypoparathyroidism occurred in 0.1% (1/741) of ST patients compared to 0.6% (3/543) of TT patients (OR 3.09 (95% CI 0.45 to 21.36); P = 0.25; 1275 participants: 4 trials; low quality evidence). The incidence of thyroid cancer was lower for ST compared with TT. Thyroid cancer occurred in 6.1% (41/669) of ST patients compared to 7.3% (34/465)of TT patients (OR 1.32 (95% CI 0.81 to 2.15); P = 0.27; 1134 participants; 3 trials; low quality evidence). No data on health-related quality of life or socioeconomic effects were reported in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The body of evidence on TT compared with ST is limited. Goiter recurrence is reduced following TT. The effects on other key outcomes such as re-interventions due to goitre recurrence, adverse events and thyroid cancer incidence are uncertain. New long-term RCTs with additional data such as surgeons level of experience, treatment volume of surgical centres and details on techniques used are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- University of PerugiaDepartment of General SurgeryTerniItaly05100
| | | | - Justus Randolph
- Mercer UniversityTift College of Education3001 Mercer University Dr.AtlantaGAUSA30341
| | - Salvatore Guarino
- Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Surgical SciencesViale Regina Elena 324RomeItaly00161
| | - Giorgio Di Rocco
- Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Surgical SciencesViale Regina Elena 324RomeItaly00161
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical SciencesCorso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14TurinItaly10126
| | - Vito D'Andrea
- Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Surgical SciencesViale Regina Elena 324RomeItaly00161
| | - Alberto Santoro
- Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Surgical SciencesViale Regina Elena 324RomeItaly00161
| | - Marcin Barczyñski
- Jagiellonian University, Medical CollegeDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Third Chair of General Surgery37 Pradnicka StreetKrakowPoland31‐202
| | - Nicola Avenia
- University of PerugiaDepartment of Endocrine SurgeryTerniTerniItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, Coratti A, Guarino S, Renzi C, Corsi A, Boselli C, Santoro A, Minelli L, Parisi A. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Approach in Colonic Resections for Cancer and Benign Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015. [PMID: 26214845 PMCID: PMC4516360 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare robotic colectomy (RC) with laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search was performed to retrieve comparative studies of robotic and laparoscopic colectomy. The databases searched were PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2000 to October 2014. The Odds ratio, Risk difference and Mean difference were used as the summary statistics. Results A total of 12 studies, which included a total of 4,148 patients who had undergone robotic or laparoscopic colectomy, were included and analyzed. RC demonstrated a longer operative time (MD 41.52, P<0.00001) and higher cost (MD 2.42, P<0.00001) than did LC. The time to first flatus passage (MD -0.51, P = 0.003) and the length of hospital stay (MD -0.68, P = 0.01) were significantly shorter after RC. Additionally, the intraoperative blood loss (MD -16.82, P<0.00001) was significantly less in RC. There was also a significantly lower incidence of overall postoperative complications (OR 0.74, P = 0.02) and wound infections (RD -0.02, P = 0.03) after RC. No differences in the postoperative ileus, in the anastomotic leak, or in the conversion to open surgery rate and in the number of harvested lymph nodes outcomes were found between the approaches. Conclusions The present meta-analysis, mainly based on observational studies, suggests that RC is more time-consuming and expensive than laparoscopy but that it results in faster recovery of bowel function, a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss and lower rates of both overall postoperative complications and wound infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Renzi
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alessia Corsi
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlo Boselli
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alberto Santoro
- Department of Surgical Science, “Sapienza” University, Rome, Italy
| | - Liliana Minelli
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Public Health Section, University of Perugia. Perugia, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Parisi A, Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Renzi C, Boselli C, De Santis F, Petrina A, Annecchiarico M, Di Marino M, Bencini L, Perna F, Pironi D, Santoro A, Coratti A. Robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technical considerations. Int J Surg 2015; 21 Suppl 1:S59-63. [PMID: 26118615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopy has revolutionized the way of thinking abdominal surgery, however, to date there are still limitations making it difficult to apply this technique to some types of surgical procedures considered technically demanding even when performed by open surgery, such as the pancreaticoduodenectomy. This technical note provides a complete description of the surgical procedure performed for the execution of a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy through the use of the "Da Vinci Si" robotic system. Robotic systems represent a real evolution in minimally invasive surgery. We wish to emphasize this concept, highlighting the application of this technology to complex procedures in digestive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Caudio Renzi
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlo Boselli
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Francesco De Santis
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Adolfo Petrina
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Mario Annecchiarico
- Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Di Marino
- Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lapo Bencini
- Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Federico Perna
- Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Pironi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Santoro
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Parisi A, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Grassi V, Trastulli S, Barberini F, Corsi A, Cacurri A, Renzi C, Anastasio F, Battista F, Pucci G, Noya G, Schillaci G. Road accident due to a pancreatic insulinoma: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e537. [PMID: 25816027 PMCID: PMC4554003 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Insulinoma is a rare pancreatic endocrine tumor, typically sporadic and solitary. Although the Whipple triad, consisting of hypoglycemia, neuroglycopenic symptoms, and symptoms relief with glucose administration, is often present, the diagnosis may be challenging when symptoms are less typical. We report a case of road accident due to an episode of loss of consciousness in a patient with pancreatic insulinoma. In the previous months, the patient had occasionally reported nonspecific symptoms. During hospitalization, endocrine examinations were compatible with an insulin-producing tumor. Abdominal computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging allowed us to identify and localize the tumor. The patient underwent a robotic distal pancreatectomy with partial omentectomy and splenectomy. Insulin-producing tumors may go undetected for a long period due to nonspecific clinical symptoms, and may cause episodes of loss of consciousness with potentially lethal consequences. Robot-assisted procedures can be performed with the same techniques of the traditional surgery, reducing surgical trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amilcare Parisi
- From the Unit of Digestive and Liver Surgery (AP, JD, VG, ST, AC), Santa Maria Hospital, Terni; Department of General and Oncologic Surgery (RC, FB, AC, CR, GN), University of Perugia, Perugia; Unit of Internal Medicine (FA, FB, GP, GS), Santa Maria Hospital, Terni; and Department of Medicine (FA, FB, GP, GS), University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Vettoretto N, Milani D, Cavaliere D, Renzi C, Adamenko O, Desiderio J, Burattini MF, Parisi A, Arezzo A, Fingerhut A. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage: a definitive treatment for diverticular peritonitis or a "bridge" to elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy?: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e334. [PMID: 25569649 PMCID: PMC4602849 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To this day, the treatment of generalized peritonitis secondary to diverticular perforation is still controversial. Recently, in patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis, laparoscopic lavage and drainage has gained a wide interest as an alternative to resection. Based on this backdrop, we decided to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of peritoneal lavage in perforated diverticular disease.A bibliographic search was performed in PubMed for case series and comparative studies published between January 1992 and February 2014 describing laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in patients with perforated diverticulitis.A total of 19 articles consisting of 10 cohort studies, 8 case series, and 1 controlled clinical trial met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. In total these studies analyzed data from 871 patients. The mean follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 96 months when reported. In 11 studies, the success rate of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, defined as patients alive without surgical treatment for a recurrent episode of diverticulitis, was 24.3%. In patients with Hinchey stage III diverticulitis, the incidence of laparotomy conversion was 1%, whereas in patients with stage IV it was 45%. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.9%. The 30-day postoperative reintervention rate was 4.9%, whereas 2% of patients required a percutaneous drainage. Readmission rate after the first hospitalization for recurrent diverticulitis was 6%. Most patients who were readmitted (69%) required redo surgery. A 2-stage laparoscopic intervention was performed in 18.3% of patients.Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage should be considered an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid diverticulitis with Hinchey stage III peritonitis; it can also be consider as a "bridge" surgical step combined with a delayed and elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in order to avoid a Hartmann procedure. This minimally invasive staged approach should be considered for patients without systemic toxicity and in centers experienced in minimally invasive surgery techniques. Further evidence is needed, and the ongoing RCTs will better define the role of the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage/drainage in the treatment of patients with complicated diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- From the Department of Digestive Surgery (RC, ST, OA, JD, AP), St. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni; Laparoscopic Surgical Unit (NV), M. Mellini Hospital, Chiari, Italy; University of Notre Dame (DM), Fremantle, Australia; Forlì Hospital (DC), Surgical Oncology, Forlì; Department of General and Oncologic Surgery (CR, MFB), University of Perugia, Perugia; Department of Surgical Sciences (AA), University of Torino, Torino, Italy; First Department of Surgery (AF), Hippokration Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Section for Surgical Research (AF), Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parisi A, Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Grassi V, Ricci F, Farinacci F, Cacurri A, Castellani E, Corsi A, Renzi C, Barberini F, D'Andrea V, Santoro A, Cirocchi R. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a case of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Surg Oncol 2014; 12:372. [PMID: 25475024 PMCID: PMC4289318 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is rarely performed, and it has not been particularly successful due to its technical complexity. The objective of this study is to highlight how robotic surgery could improve a minimally invasive approach and to expose the usefulness of robotic surgery even in complex surgical procedures. Case presentation The surgical technique employed in our center to perform a pancreaticoduodenectomy, which was by means of the da Vinci™ robotic system in order to remove a duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor, is reported. Conclusions Robotic technology has improved significantly over the traditional laparoscopic approach, representing an evolution of minimally invasive techniques, allowing procedures to be safely performed that are still considered to be scarcely feasible or reproducible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Claudio Renzi
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazzale Gambuli 1, Perugia, 06157, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Parisi A, Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Ricci F, Farinacci F, Mangia A, Boselli C, Noya G, Filippini A, D'Andrea V, Santoro A. Robotic rectal resection for cancer: A prospective cohort study to analyze surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes. Int J Surg 2014; 12:1456-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2014] [Revised: 11/09/2014] [Accepted: 11/11/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
32
|
Cirocchi R, Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Cavaliere D, Farinella E, Renzi C, Cannata G, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Barberini F, Trastulli S, Parisi A, Fingerhut A. Role of damage control surgery in the treatment of Hinchey III and IV sigmoid diverticulitis: a tailored strategy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e184. [PMID: 25437034 PMCID: PMC4616377 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Many of the treatment strategies for sigmoid diverticulitis are actually focusing on nonoperative and minimally invasive approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the actual role of damage control surgery (DCS) in the treatment of generalized peritonitis caused by perforated sigmoid diverticulitis.A literature search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar for articles published from 1960 to July 2013. Comparative and noncomparative studies that included patients who underwent DCS for complicated diverticulitis were considered.Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, duration of open abdomen, intensive care unit length of stay, reoperation, bowel resection performed at first operation, fecal diversion, method, and timing of closure of abdominal wall were the main outcomes of interest.According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses algorithm for the literature search and review, 10 studies were included in this systematic review. DCS was exclusively performed in diverticulitis patients with septic shock or requiring vasopressors intraoperatively. Two surgical different approaches were highlighted: limited resection of the diseased colonic segment with or without stoma or reconstruction in situ, and laparoscopic washing and drainage without colonic resection.Despite the heterogeneity of patient groups, clinical settings, and interventions included in this review, DCS appears to be a promising strategy for the treatment of Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis, complicated by septic shock. A tailored approach to each patient seems to be appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- From the Department of Digestive Surgery (RC, JD, ST, AP), St. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni; Department of Surgical Sciences (AA), University of Turin, Turin; Laparoscopic Surgical Unit (NV), M. Mellini Hospital, Chiari; Department of Surgical Oncology (DC), Forlì; Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery (EF), Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin; Department of General and Oncologic Surgery (CR, GC, FB), University of Perugia, Perugia; Department of Mininvasive and Robotic Surgery (FF), St. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy; Athens First Department of Surgery (Prof Leandros) (AF), Hippokration University Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; and Section for Surgical Research (Prof Uranues) (AF), Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Ricci F, Boselli C, Noya G, Redler A, Santoro A, Parisi A. One-stage minimally invasive combined laparoscopic hepatic resection and robot-assisted right hemicolectomy and abdominoperineal resection - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16:930. [PMID: 25204432 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Parisi A, Coratti F, Cirocchi R, Grassi V, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Ricci F, Adamenko O, Economou AI, Cacurri A, Trastulli S, Renzi C, Castellani E, Di Rocco G, Redler A, Santoro A, Coratti A. Robotic distal pancreatectomy with or without preservation of spleen: a technical note. World J Surg Oncol 2014; 12:295. [PMID: 25248464 PMCID: PMC4190462 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2014] [Accepted: 09/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is a surgical procedure performed to remove the pancreatic tail jointly with a variable part of the pancreatic body and including a spleen resection in the case of conventional distal pancreatectomy or not in the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Methods In this article, we describe a standardized operative technique for fully robotic distal pancreatectomy. Results In the last decade, the use of robotic systems has become increasingly common as an approach for benign and malignant pancreatic disease treatment. Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) is an emerging technology for which sufficient data to draw definitive conclusions in surgical oncology are still not available because the follow-up period after surgery is too short (less than 2 years). Conclusions RDP is an emerging technology for which sufficient data to draw definitive conclusions of value in surgical oncology are still not available, however this techniques is safe and reproducible by surgeons that possess adequate skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Veronica Grassi
- Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St Maria Hospital, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio 1, 05100 Terni, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cirocchi R, Randolph JJ, Montedori A, Cochetti GG, Arezzo A, Mearini EE, Abraha I, Trastulli S. Staples versus sutures for surgical wound closure in adults. Hippokratia 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy
| | - Justus J Randolph
- Mercer University; Tift College of Education; 3001 Mercer University Dr. Atlanta GA USA 30341
| | - Alessandro Montedori
- Regional Health Authority of Umbria; Health Planning Service; Via Mario Angeloni 61 Perugia Umbria Italy 06124
| | - Giovanni G Cochetti
- University of Perugia; Surgical and Biomedical Science; SantAndrea delle Fratte Perugia Italy 06100
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- University of Torino; Department of Surgical Sciences; Corso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14 Turin Italy 10126
| | - Ettore E Mearini
- University of Perugia; Surgical and Biomedical Science; SantAndrea delle Fratte Perugia Italy 06100
| | - Iosief Abraha
- Regional Health Authority of Umbria; Epidemiology Department; Via Mario Angeloni, 61 Perugia Italy 06124
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cirocchi R, Morelli U, Arezzo A, Trastulli S, Parisi A, Falconi M, Morino M, Sagar J. Double-stapled anastomosis versus mucosectomy and handsewn anastomosis in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Hippokratia 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy
| | - Umberto Morelli
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas - UNICAMP; Department of Colorectal Surgery; Barão Geraldo Campinas, São Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil 13083-887
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- University of Torino; Department of Surgical Sciences; Corso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14 Turin Italy 10126
| | | | - Amilcare Parisi
- Hospital of Terni; Liver Unit and Department of Digestive Surgery; Terni Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Università Politecnica delle Marche A.O.U. Ospedali Riuniti; Clinica Chirurgia del Pancreas; Via Conca 71 Torrette DI Ancona Italy 60126
| | - Mario Morino
- University of Turin; Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery; Corso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14 Turin Italy 10126
| | - Jayesh Sagar
- St. Peter's Hospital; Department of Surgery; Chertsey UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cacurri A, Cannata G, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Mangia A, Adamenko O, Pressi E, Giovannelli G, Noya G, Parisi A. A rare case of perforated descending colon cancer complicated with a fistula and abscess of left iliopsoas and ipsilateral obturator muscle. Case Rep Surg 2014; 2014:128506. [PMID: 24744948 PMCID: PMC3976818 DOI: 10.1155/2014/128506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2013] [Accepted: 02/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Perforation of descending colon cancer combined with iliopsoas abscess and fistula formation is a rare condition and has been reported few times. A 67-year-old man came to our first aid for an acute pain in the left iliac fossa, in the flank, and in the ipsilateral thigh. Ultrasonography and computed tomography revealed a left abdominal wall, retroperitoneal, and iliopsoas abscess that also involved the ipsilateral obturator muscle. It proceeded with an exploratory laparotomy that showed a tumor of the descending colon adhered and perforated in the retroperitoneum with abscess of the iliopsoas muscle on the left-hand side, with presence of a fistula and liver metastases. A left hemicolectomy with drainage of the broad abscess was performed. Pathologic report findings determined adenocarcinoma of the resected colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alban Cacurri
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, 06157 Perugia, Italy
| | - Gaspare Cannata
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, 06157 Perugia, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Antongiulio Mangia
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, 06157 Perugia, Italy
| | - Olga Adamenko
- Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Eleonora Pressi
- Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Giorgio Giovannelli
- Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Noya
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, 06157 Perugia, Italy
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive and Liver Surgery Unit, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Scalercio V, Mirri E, Grandone I, Cirocchi R, Penzo J, Santoro A, Redler A, Boselli C, Noya G, Fatati G, Parisi A. Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with morbid obesity and metabolic disorders. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013; 15:1004-9. [PMID: 23984802 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2013.0162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSES Obesity and its correlation with other pathological conditions determine the onset of the metabolic syndrome, which exposes the patient to a higher risk of major cardiovascular complications. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a bariatric surgical procedure that appears to influence both the reduction of fat mass and the action of some gastrointestinal hormones. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2011 and July 2013, 23 patients with morbid obesity underwent LSG and follow-up. In the evaluation of patients, the criteria for metabolic syndrome given by the International Diabetes Federation were followed. A multidisciplinary team of experts evaluated patients before surgery and in subsequent scheduled postoperative visits at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days and 4, 5, 6, 9, and 12 months. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters were analyzed. RESULTS The mean excess weight loss was 8.57±3.02%, 17.65±6.40%, 25.47±7.90%, 33.76±9.27%, 41.83±10.71%, 46.02±13.90%, 52.60±14.05%, 58.48±16.07%, and 62.59±21.29% at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days and 4, 5, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. In the same observational period there was an excellent improvement of metabolic indices. None of the patients previously taking prescribed hypoglycemic drugs restarted therapy. Mean fasting plasma glucose significantly decreased compared with the preoperative values. Blood pressure had a statistically significant improvement. Modification in the lipid profile was more variable. During the period of observation 22 of 23 patients reported in this study did not fit the criteria for metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS Morbid obesity and related diseases may benefit from a surgical approach in selected patients. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the role of LSG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- 1 Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Maria Hospital , Terni, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
DE Sol A, Trastulli S, Grassi V, Corsi A, Barillaro I, Boccolini A, DI Patrizi MS, DI Rocco G, Santoro A, Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Redler A, Noya G, Kong SH. Requirement for a standardised definition of advanced gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 2013; 7:164-170. [PMID: 24348842 PMCID: PMC3861594 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/23/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Each year, ~988,000 new cases of stomach cancer are reported worldwide. Uniformity for the definition of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is required to ensure the improved management of patients. Various classifications do actually exist for gastric cancer, but the classification determined by lesion depth is extremely important, as it has been shown to correlate with patient prognosis; for example, early gastric cancer (EGC) has a favourable prognosis when compared with AGC. In the literature, the definition of EGC is clear, however, there is heterogeneity in the definition of AGC. In the current study, all parameters of the TNM classification for AGC reported in each previous study were individually analysed. It was necessary to perform a comprehensive systematic literature search of all previous studies that have reported a definition of ACG to guarantee homogeneity in the assessment of surgical outcome. It must be understood that the term ‘advanced gastric cancer’ may implicate a number of stages of disease, and studies must highlight the exact clinical TNM stages used for evaluation of the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo DE Sol
- Department of General Surgery, University of Perugia, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Stefano Trastulli
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Veronica Grassi
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alessia Corsi
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ivan Barillaro
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Boccolini
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Micol Sole DI Patrizi
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giorgio DI Rocco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Santoro
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlo Boselli
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Adriano Redler
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Noya
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Seong-Ho Kong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Santoro A, Guarino S, Covarelli P, Renzi C, Listorti C, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Coratti A, Noya G, Redler A, Parisi A. Current status of robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. BMC Surg 2013; 13:53. [PMID: 24199869 PMCID: PMC3826835 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 11/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment to obtain weight loss in severely obese patients. The feasibility and safety of bariatric robotic surgery is the topic of this review. Methods A search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, BioMed Central, and Web of Science. Results Twenty-two studies were included. Anastomotic leak rate was 8.51% in biliopancreatic diversion. 30-day reoperation rate was 1.14% in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 1.16% in sleeve gastrectomy. Major complication rate in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass resulted higher than in sleeve gastrectomy ( 4,26% vs. 1,2%). The mean hospital stay was longer in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (range 2.6-7.4 days). Conclusions The major limitation of our analysis is due to the small number and the low quality of the studies, the small sample size, heterogeneity of the enrolled patients and the lack of data from metabolic and bariatric outcomes. Despite the use of the robot, the majority of these cases are completed with stapled anastomosis. The assumption that robotic surgery is superior in complex cases is not supported by the available present evidence. The major strength of the robotic surgery is strongly facilitating some of the surgical steps (gastro-jejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy anastomosis in the robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or the vertical gastric resection in the robotic sleeve gastrectomy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Claudio Renzi
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Noya G, Parisi A, Cavaliere D. Corrigendum to “Robotic gastric resection of large gastrointestinal stromal tumors” [Int J Surg 11 (2013) 191–196]. Int J Surg 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
42
|
Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Corsi A, Farinella E, Listorti C, Trastulli S, Renzi C, Desiderio J, Santoro A, Cagini L, Parisi A, Redler A, Noya G, Fingerhut A. Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review. Crit Care 2013; 17:R185. [PMID: 24004931 PMCID: PMC4056798 DOI: 10.1186/cc12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2012] [Accepted: 09/03/2013] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The goal of non-operative management (NOM) for blunt splenic trauma (BST) is to preserve the spleen. The advantages of NOM for minor splenic trauma have been extensively reported, whereas its value for the more severe splenic injuries is still debated. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available published evidence on NOM in patients with splenic trauma and to compare it with the operative management (OM) in terms of mortality, morbidity and duration of hospital stay. Methods For this systematic review we followed the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" statement. A systematic search was performed on PubMed for studies published from January 2000 to December 2011, without language restrictions, which compared NOM vs. OM for splenic trauma injuries and which at least 10 patients with BST. Results We identified 21 non randomized studies: 1 Clinical Controlled Trial and 20 retrospective cohort studies analyzing a total of 16,940 patients with BST. NOM represents the gold standard treatment for minor splenic trauma and is associated with decreased mortality in severe splenic trauma (4.78% vs. 13.5% in NOM and OM, respectively), according to the literature. Of note, in BST treated operatively, concurrent injuries accounted for the higher mortality. In addition, it was not possible to determine post-treatment morbidity in major splenic trauma. The definition of hemodynamic stability varied greatly in the literature depending on the surgeon and the trauma team, representing a further bias. Moreover, data on the remaining analyzed outcomes (hospital stay, number of blood transfusions, abdominal abscesses, overwhelming post-splenectomy infection) were not reported in all included studies or were not comparable, precluding the possibility to perform a meaningful cumulative analysis and comparison. Conclusions NOM of BST, preserving the spleen, is the treatment of choice for the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades I and II. Conclusions are more difficult to outline for higher grades of splenic injury, because of the substantial heterogeneity of expertise among different hospitals, and potentially inappropriate comparison groups.
Collapse
|
43
|
Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Trastulli S, Coratti A, Parisi A, Falconi M. A systematic review on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Oncol 2013; 22:238-46. [PMID: 24060451 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2013] [Revised: 08/21/2013] [Accepted: 08/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery might have several advantages in respect of the laparoscopic approach since might make more feasible the execution of a complex procedure such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the current state of the literature on robotic PD. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed, from January 1st 2003 to July 31st 2012, for studies which reported PDs performed for neoplasm and in which at least one surgical reconstructive or resective step was robotically performed. RESULTS Thirteen studies, representing 207 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The definition of the robotic approach was heterogeneous since the technique was defined as robotic, robotic-assisted, robot-assisted laparoscopic and robotic hybrid. Resection and reconstruction steps of robotic PD were also heterogeneous combining sequentially different approaches: totally robotic technique, laparoscopic-robotic resection and robotic reconstruction, laparoscopic resection and robotic reconstruction, hand port-assisted laparoscopic resection and robotic reconstruction, laparoscopic-robotic resection and reconstruction through mini-laparotomy. As regard the type of PD 66% were classic Whipple operations and 34% pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomies. The management of pancreatic stump was a pancreaticogastrostomy in 23%, end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy in 67%, and fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in 10% of cases. The overall procedure failure (rates of conversion to open surgery) was 14%. The overall morbidity rate was 58% and the reoperation rate was 7.3%. CONCLUSIONS There have been an increasing number of recent case series suggesting increased utilization of robotic PD over the past decade. The technical approach is heterogenous. For highly selected patient, robotic PD is feasible with similar morbidity and mortality compared to open or purely laparoscopic approaches. Data on cost analysis are lacking and further studies are needed to evaluate also the cost-effectiveness of the robotic approach for PD in comparison to open or laparoscopic techniques. The current state of the art analysis on robotic DP can be also useful in planning future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- General Surgery, St. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Guarino S, Cirocchi R, Scalercio V, Noya G, Parisi A. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared with other bariatric surgical procedures: a systematic review of randomized trials. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013; 9:816-29. [PMID: 23993246 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2012] [Revised: 05/11/2013] [Accepted: 05/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been mostly based on the data derived from nonrandomized studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of LSG and to present an up-to-date review of the available evidence based on the recent publications of new randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until November 2012 for RCTs on LSG. RESULTS Fifteen RCTs, comprising a total of 1191 patients, of whom 795 had undergone LSG, were included. No patient required conversion to open surgery for LSG, laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB), or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) procedures. There were no deaths, and the complication rate was 12.1% (range 10%-13.2%) in the LSG group versus 20.9% (range 10%-26.4%) in the LGB group, and 0% in the LAGB group (only 1 RCT). The complications included leakage, bleeding, stricture, and reoperation that occurred with rates of .9%, 3.3%, 0%, and 2.1%, respectively, in the LSG group and rates of 0%, 5%, 0%, and 4%, respectively, in the LGB group. The average operating time in the LSG group was 106.5 minutes versus 132.3 minutes in the LGB group. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) ranged from 49% to 81% in the LSG group, from 62.1% to 94.4% in the LGB group, and from 28.7% to 48% in the LAGB group, with a follow-up ranging from 6 months to 3 years. The type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rate ranged from 26.5% to 75% in the LSG group and from 42% to 93% in the LGB group. CONCLUSIONS LSG is a well-tolerated, feasible procedure with a relatively short operating time. Its effectiveness in terms of weight loss is confirmed for short-term follow-up (≤ 3 years). The role of LSG in the treatment of T2DM requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Trastulli
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, "St. Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Parisi A, Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Castellani E, Pasquale R, Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Noya G. Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2013; 12:270-7. [PMID: 23742772 DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60044-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of primary liver tumor and its incidence is increasing worldwide. The study aimed to compare patients subjected to liver resection or radiofrequency ablation. METHODS One hundred and forty cirrhotic patients in stage A or B of Child-Pugh with single nodular or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 87 underwent surgical resection, and 53 underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Patient characteristics, survival, and recurrence-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS Recurrence-free survival was longer in the resection group in comparison to the radiofrequency group with a median recurrence-free time of 36 versus 26 months, respectively (P=0.01, HR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.05-2.25). In the resection group, median survival was 46 months, with the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 89.7%, 72.4% and 40.2%. In the radiofrequency group, median survival was 32 months, with the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 83.0%, 43.4% and 22.6% (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection improves the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in comparison with radiofrequency ablation. New evidences are needed to define the real role of the percutaneous technique as an alternative to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Scalercio V, Cirocchi R, Carloni G, Moriconi E, Boselli C, Noya G, Parisi A. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and medical management for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in non-morbidly obese patients: a single-center experience. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013; 15:281-8. [PMID: 23406367 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity are often associated in the same metabolic pathology and represent a significant public health problem. Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively recent technique of bariatric surgery, it has shown to be efficient and safe and has obtained much support from physicians and patients. Several studies have highlighted the effects in terms of resolution and improvement of diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS From January 2009 to November 2012, 15 patients in Obesity Class II (body mass index [BMI], 37.9 ± 1.5 kg/m(2); baseline weight, 102.7 ± 11.6 kg) with uncontrolled T2DM despite taking a glucose-lowering drug therapy (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], 8.1 ± 0.6%) underwent LSG and advanced practice medical management in accordance with the American Diabetes Association guidelines. All patients were subjected to follow-up controls with anthropometric and metabolic indices at 5, 15, 30, and 60 days, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery, remission of diabetes was also evaluated. RESULTS At 1 year after surgery, the mean excess weight loss percentage (EWL%) was 58.4%, and the mean BMI had decreased from the preoperative value of 37.9 kg/m(2) to 30.4 kg/m(2). The average reduction in HbA1c was 2.5 (30.9%). The mean homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance decreased from 13.3 to 4.9. Overall, during the period of observation, four patients (26.7%) had started drug therapy again, six patients had complete remission (40%), and five patients had partial remission (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS LSG not only makes it possible to attain a significant EWL% in obese patients, but also a remission or improvement of diabetes. Further studies are required to determine the duration of the effect and the role of different factors involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Listorti C, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Liu L. Treatment of Hinchey stage III-IV diverticulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28:447-57. [PMID: 23242271 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1622-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This manuscript is a review of different surgical techniques to manage perforated colon diverticulitis. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to compare the benefits and disadvantages of different surgical treatments for Hinchey III or IV type of colon diverticulitis. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Science Citation Index (1990 and 2011). A total of 1,809 publications were identified and 14 studies with 1,041 patients were included in the study. Any surgical treatment was considered in this review. Mortality was considered the primary outcome, whereas hospital stay and reoperation rate were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS Primary resection with anastomosis has a significant advantage in terms of lower mortality rate with respect to Hartmann's procedure (P = 0.02). The postoperative length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the resection with anastomosis group (P < 0.001). Different findings have emerged from studies of patients with the primary resection with anastomosis vs laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and subsequent resection: overall surgical morbidity and hospital stay were lower in the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage group compared to the primary resection and anastomosis group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite numerous published articles on operative treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis, we found a marked heterogeneity between included studies limiting the possibility to summarize in a metanalytical method the data provided and make difficult to synthesize data in a quantitative fashion. The advantages in the group of colon resection with primary anastomosis in terms of lower mortality rate and postoperative stay should be interpreted with caution because of several limitations. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate different surgical treatments for patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Boselli C, Renzi C, Gemini A, Castellani E, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Corsi A, Barberini F, Cirocchi R, Santoro A, Parisi A, Redler A, Noya G. Surgery in asymptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver metastases: the authors' experience. Onco Targets Ther 2013; 6:267-72. [PMID: 23569390 PMCID: PMC3615897 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s39448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In asymptomatic patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer, the debate continues over the efficacy of primary resection compared to chemotherapy alone. The aim of this study was to define the optimal management for asymptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients receiving elective surgery (n = 17) were compared to patients receiving chemotherapy only (n = 31). Data concerning patients' demographics, location of primary tumor, comorbidities, performance status, Child-Pugh score, extension of liver metastases, size of primary, and other secondary locations were collected. RESULTS Thirty-day mortality after chemotherapy was lower than that after surgical resection (19.3% versus 29.4%; not significant). In patients with >75% hepatic involvement, mortality at 1 month was higher after receiving surgical treatment than after chemotherapy alone (50% versus 25%). In patients with <75% hepatic involvement, 30-day mortality was similar in both groups (not significant). Thirty-day mortality in patients with Stage T3 was lower in those receiving chemotherapy (16.7% versus 30%; not significant). Overall survival was similar in both groups. The risk of all-cause death after elective surgery (2.1) was significantly higher than in patients receiving chemotherapy only (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that in palliative treatment of asymptomatic unresectable Stage IV colorectal cancer, the overall risk of death was significantly higher after elective surgery compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone. However, in the literature, there is no substantial difference between these treatments. New studies are required to better evaluate outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Boselli
- Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Guarino S, Barczyñski M, Avenia N. Total versus subtotal thyroidectomy for multinodular non-toxic goitre in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
50
|
Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Noya G, Guarino S. Planned relaparotomy versus relaparotomy on demand for treatment of secondary peritonitis. Hippokratia 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy
| | - Carlo Boselli
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy
| | - Giuseppe Noya
- University of Perugia; Department of General Surgery; Terni Italy
| | - Salvatore Guarino
- Royal Free Hospital - UCL Partner; University Department of Surgery; Pond Street London UK NW3 2QG
| |
Collapse
|