The prognostic value of quality-of-life scores: preliminary results of an analysis of patients with breast cancer

Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: the effect of surgery on quality of life in breast cancer survivors in Malaysia

BACKGROUND

In the competitive health care environment, patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) have become the subject of interest to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions as we experience improved breast cancer survival in modern times. The knowledge of the long-term effects of surgery on the QoL in breast cancer patients is currently limited in the Asian setting. The purpose of this longitudinal study is to evaluate the QoL of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, the QoL of 208 patients who underwent mastectomy and the BCS treatment were assessed, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered at the baseline, 6 and 12 months following diagnosis. One-way ANCOVA was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 208 female survivors of Stage 0-II breast cancer were included, among them 47.1% underwent BCS and 52.9% underwent mastectomy. Older (63.3%), Chinese women (63.6%), and patients with primary education (71.7%) were more likely to undergo mastectomy. At baseline, no significant differences were observed for QoL in both treatment groups. At 6 months, patients who underwent BCS had better social functioning scales( P = 0.006) and worse symptom scales for dyspnoea (P = 0.031), compared to mastectomy patients. One year after diagnosis, the role functioning score of the mastectomy group was significantly higher than the BCS group, specifically among patients who had undergone chemotherapy (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent BCS had better social functioning and worse dyspnoea symptoms compared to patients undergoing mastectomy at six months. During one year, there were only significant improvements in the role functioning among the mastectomy groups compared to the BCS groups. After further stratification, only mastectomy patients who received chemotherapy exhibited improved role functioning compared to patients those who did not undergo chemotherapy. Providing social and physical support postoperatively and monitoring patients for cancer worry, or other symptoms in the long-term survivorship period would be important to ensure optimal QoL.

Significance of age-associated quality of life in patients with stage IV breast cancer who underwent endocrine therapy in Japan

Currently, when determining treatment regimens, there is an emphasis on the quality of life (QOL), in addition to treatment efficacy. Especially in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases, unless death is imminent, a common first-line treatment is endocrine therapy, which has fewer side effects. In the present study, the differences in QOL were evaluated based on the age and prognostic indicators of 46 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with distant metastases (stage IV), who received first-line endocrine therapy at the Osaka City University Hospital (Osaka, Japan) between November 2007 and November 2016. QOL score before and after endocrine therapy was retrospectively analyzed, using the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-Cancer Drugs-Breast (QOL-ACD-B). There was no significant association between age and any of the clinicopathological features investigated. However, the QOL score of the elderly patient group was significantly higher compared with that of the younger group in the 'Satisfaction with treatment and coping with disease' subcategory (P=0.008). The QOL score of the younger age group in the same subcategory was significantly improved by the treatment (P=0.013). The patients that had an increased overall QOL score 3 months after treatment initiation had a significant extension of progression-free survival (PFS) rate compared to the patients with decreased or no change in QOL (P=0.032). In conclusion, psychological stress was more prominent in younger patients with stage IV breast cancer treated with hormonal therapy compared with elderly patients. Importantly, improving QOL within the 3 months after treatment initiation could lead to longer PFS rate.

Prognostic value of quality-of-life scores in patients with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy

Background

Recently, evaluation of quality of life (QOL) has been recognized as a significant outcome measure in the treatment of several cancers. In this study, the Anti-Cancer Drugs-Breast (ACD-B) QOL score was used to assess disease-specific survival in women with breast cancer undergoing preoperative chemotherapy (POC).

Methods

QOL-ACD-B scores were evaluated before and after POC. The cut-off value of QOL-ACD-B contributing to events such as relapse or death was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

In 300 women with breast cancer treated with POC, QOL was significantly reduced (P < 0·001). A high QOL-ACD-B score before POC was an independent factor in the multivariable analysis of overall survival (hazard ratio 0·26, 95 per cent c.i. 0·04 to 0·96).

Conclusion

Evaluation by QOL-ACD-B before POC may be useful to predict the prognosis of patients with breast cancer undergoing POC.

Novel evaluation scale for QOL (QOL-ACD-BP) in preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer

PURPOSE

Quality-of-life (QOL) has been reported to affect the prognosis of many types of cancer, and several studies used various QOL assessment tools to determine the relationship between QOL and cancer prognosis. In this study, QOL-Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-Cancer Drugs-the Breast (QOL-ACD-B) was modified to be suitable for preoperative chemotherapy (POC) and was named the QOL-ACD-BP.

METHODS

A total of 300 patients were treated with POC after being diagnosed with breast cancer between February 2007 and December 2016 at our institute. We evaluated novel evaluation scale for QOL (QOL-ACD-BP) before and after POC in a retrospective manner.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis with overall survival, the high QOL before [p = 0.048, hazard ratio (HR) 0.441] or after POC (p = 0.030, HR 0.273) was an independent factor.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that QOL after POC may also affect prognosis and supported the importance of maintaining QOL in cancer treatment. In patients with breast cancer treated with POC, QOL-ACD-BP, which is a new QOL evaluation index, was found to be a useful tool for predicting the patients' prognosis.

The impact of outpatient chemotherapy-related adverse events on the quality of life of breast cancer patients

The objective of our study was to clarify the impact of adverse events associated with the initial course of outpatient chemotherapy on the quality of life of breast cancer patients. We conducted a survey to assess the quality of life in 48 breast cancer patients before and after receiving their first course of outpatient chemotherapy at Gifu Municipal Hospital. Patients completed the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions and Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs before and after 1 course of outpatient chemotherapy. European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions utility value and Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs total score decreased significantly after chemotherapy (p<0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). The mean scores for the activity, physical condition, and psychological condition subscales of the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs decreased significantly after chemotherapy (p = 0.003, p<0.001, and p = 0.032, respectively), whereas the social relationships score increased significantly (p<0.001). Furthermore, in the evaluation of quality of life according to individual adverse events, the decrease in quality of life after chemotherapy in terms of the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions utility value and the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs total score was greater in anorexic patients than in non-anorexic patients (p = 0.009 and p<0.001, respectively). This suggests that anorexia greatly reduces quality of life. Our findings reveal that anticancer drug-related adverse events, particularly anorexia, reduce overall quality of life following the first course of outpatient chemotherapy in current breast cancer patients. These findings are extremely useful and important in understanding the impact of anticancer drug-related adverse events on quality of life.

Quality of life as a predictor of overall survival after breast cancer treatment

PURPOSE

To describe quality of life (QoL) in a cohort of surviving women 4 years after breast cancer treatment and to analyze its role as a predictor of mortality within 2 years.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of 544 women who have undergone surgical treatment, from 2001 to 2002 and who answered a questionnaire about QoL in 2006. After, we conducted a survival study to evaluate the association between QoL and mortality within 2 years with the same population. We conducted factor analysis between the variables of the scales of function and symptoms. Survival analysis was conducted by Kaplan-Meier, and differences in survival curves were assessed with the log-rank test, assuming significant statistical level of 5 %. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore the relationship between QoL variables (functional scales) and prognostic value for survival.

RESULTS

The mean age of the women was 59.1 years (SD 11.66). The mean of overall QoL score was 75.16 (SD 20.93). Using factor analysis, we identified three conditions that made up the construct of QoL in this group of patients: social, psycho-emotional, and physical. Social condition was the most important factor. After assessment of QoL, the mean survival was 23 months (SD 3.90). Women who reported worse future perspective had higher chance of death compared with women better prospect of future (HR = 3.46; 95 % CI 1.36-8.79; p value = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Future perspectives were predictors of mortality, which reinforce the relevance of social support and psychological aspects for these women.

The prognostic role of quality of life assessment in breast cancer

While the use of quality of life (QoL) assessments has been increasing in oncology, few studies have examined the prognostic significance of QoL in breast cancer. We investigated the association between QoL at presentation and survival in breast cancer. We examined 1,511 breast cancer patients treated at two single-system cancer centers between January 2001 and December 2008. QoL was evaluated using the validated survey instrument EORTC-QLQ-C30. Patient survival was defined as the time interval between the date of first patient visit and the date of death from any cause/date of last contact. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of QoL after controlling for the effects of age, tumor stage, and prior treatment history. Mean age at presentation was 52.5 years. There were 590 analytic and 921 non-analytic patients. Patient stage of disease at diagnosis was I, 335; II, 591; III, 290; IV, 159; and 136 indeterminate. Median overall survival was 32.8 months (95% CI: 27.6-38.0). On univariate analysis, QoL function and symptom scales that were predictive of survival were physical (p < 0.001), role (p < 0.001), cognitive (p = 0.003), social (p < 0.001), fatigue (p < 0.001), nausea/vomiting (p < 0.001), pain (p < 0.001), dyspnea (p < 0.001), loss of appetite (p < 0.001), and constipation (p < 0.001). On multivariate analyses, only role function (degree of impairment of work and/or leisure/hobby related activities) was significantly associated with survival. This study suggests that baseline QoL (in particular, the role function) provides useful prognostic information in breast cancer.

Impact of lapatinib monotherapy on QOL and pain symptoms in patients with HER2+ relapsed or refractory inflammatory breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

EGF103009 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00105950) was a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study that showed lapatinib monotherapy to be clinically active in women with relapsed or refractory HER2+ (ErbB2+) inflammatory breast cancer that progressed following prior therapy with anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of lapatinib on quality of life (QOL) and pain symptoms in these patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

QOL and pain assessments were added during a study amendment and hence only 33 of 126 HER2+ patients were available for baseline assessment. QOL and pain were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaires, respectively. Both questionnaires were completed at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter. Change from baseline in QOL and pain scores were summarized by visit. In a post hoc analysis, scores were compared between patients with different clinical response status.

RESULTS

Over 60% of the 33 HER2+ patients with the baseline assessments completed the first three postbaseline assessments (week 4, n = 26; week 8, n = 21; week 12, n = 20). At week 8, improvement from baseline in mean EORTC QLQ-C30 scores was observed for global QOL (delta = 14.5; 95% CI: 4.0, 25.0), role functioning (delta = 15; 95% CI: 0.9, 29.1), social functioning (delta = 14.9; 95% CI: -0.5, 30.3), and physical functioning subscales (delta = 9.0; 95% CI: 1.2, 16.8). All symptom scales (except diarrhea) improved from baseline at most scheduled visits during the 20-week follow-up period. Mean scores for all four BPI-SF summary pain scores at week 8 suggested improvement in pain severity and pain interference. Clinical responders had improved scores on most aspects of QOL, compared with declining scores among nonresponders to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The QOL improvement among the small number of patients with QOL data indicates that lapatinib monotherapy may improve level of functioning/QOL and provide relief from symptoms, including pain, in the short term. These QOL benefits add to the clinical improvement associated with lapatinib therapy in heavily pretreated patients with an aggressive form of breast cancer.

Mastectomy versus conservative surgical treatment: the impact on the quality of life of women with breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: to compare the impact of mastectomy and conservative surgery on the quality of life of patients with breast cancer. METHODS: an assessment was made of the quality of life of patients undergoing mastectomy or segmentary mastectomy, at the Pouso Alegre Clinical Hospital, in the Brazilian State of Minas Gerais, using SF-36. The patients were grouped by age (<50 years and >50 years) and years of schooling (<8 years and >8 years). The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the groups with regard to the age and schooling domains of SF-36. RESULTS: a significant difference between the two groups was found in the domains of "physical functioning" (p=0.04) and "pain" (p=0.01): with the patients undergoing a mastectomy registering the worst scores. Young patients who had undergone a mastectomy displayed the worst quality of life in terms of "physical functioning" (p=0.03), "pain" (p=0.01) and "social functioning" (p=0.01); those undergoing conservative surgery aged over 50 years scored worst on "role emotional" (p=0.05). Patients undergoing a mastectomy with lower levels of schooling scored lower in "physical functioning" (p=0.01), "role physical" (p=0.05) and "pain" (p=0.05). Among those who had attended school for more than eight years, those having undergone a mastectomy scored less in the "pain" domain (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: patients who had undergone a mastectomy had worse results in the physical component of the evaluation of quality of life and this negative impact was more strongly felt among younger patients and those with lower levels of schooling.

Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life and survival are two important outcome measures in cancer research and practice. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between quality of life data and survival time in cancer patients.

METHODS

A review was undertaken of all the full publications in the English language biomedical journals between 1982 and 2008. The search was limited to cancer, and included the combination of keywords 'quality of life', 'patient reported-outcomes' 'prognostic', 'predictor', 'predictive' and 'survival' that appeared in the titles of the publications. In addition, each study was examined to ensure that it used multivariate analysis. Purely psychological studies were excluded. A manual search was also performed to include additional papers of potential interest.

RESULTS

A total of 451 citations were identified in this rapid and systematic review of the literature. Of these, 104 citations on the relationship between quality of life and survival were found to be relevant and were further examined. The findings are summarized under different headings: heterogeneous samples of cancer patients, lung cancer, breast cancer, gastro-oesophageal cancers, colorectal cancer, head and neck cancer, melanoma and other cancers. With few exceptions, the findings showed that quality of life data or some aspects of quality of life measures were significant independent predictors of survival duration. Global quality of life, functioning domains and symptom scores - such as appetite loss, fatigue and pain - were the most important indicators, individually or in combination, for predicting survival times in cancer patients after adjusting for one or more demographic and known clinical prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

This review provides evidence for a positive relationship between quality of life data or some quality of life measures and the survival duration of cancer patients. Pre-treatment (baseline) quality of life data appeared to provide the most reliable information for helping clinicians to establish prognostic criteria for treating their cancer patients. It is recommended that future studies should use valid instruments, apply sound methodological approaches and adequate multivariate statistical analyses adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics and known clinical prognostic factors with a satisfactory validation strategy. This strategy is likely to yield more accurate and specific quality of life-related prognostic variables for specific cancers.

Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007

Background

Quality of life in patients with breast cancer is an important outcome. This paper presents an extensive overview on the topic ranging from descriptive findings to clinical trials.

Methods

This was a bibliographic review of the literature covering all full publications that appeared in English language biomedical journals between 1974 and 2007. The search strategy included a combination of key words 'quality of life' and 'breast cancer' or 'breast carcinoma' in titles. A total of 971 citations were identified and after exclusion of duplicates, the abstracts of 606 citations were reviewed. Of these, meetings abstracts, editorials, brief commentaries, letters, errata and dissertation abstracts and papers that appeared online and were indexed ahead of publication were also excluded. The remaining 477 papers were examined. The major findings are summarized and presented under several headings: instruments used, validation studies, measurement issues, surgical treatment, systemic therapies, quality of life as predictor of survival, psychological distress, supportive care, symptoms and sexual functioning.

Results

Instruments-Several valid instruments were used to measure quality of life in breast cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer specific complementary measure (EORTC QLQ-BR23) and the Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy General questionnaire (FACIT-G) and its breast cancer module (FACIT-B) were found to be the most common and well developed instruments to measure quality of life in breast cancer patients. Surgery-different surgical procedures led to relatively similar results in terms of quality of life assessments, although mastectomy patients compared to conserving surgery patients usually reported a lower body image and sexual functioning. Systemic therapies-almost all studies indicated that breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy might experience several side-effects and symptoms that negatively affect their quality of life. Adjuvant hormonal therapies also were found to have similar negative impact on quality of life, although in general they were associated with improved survival. Quality of life as predictor of survival-similar to known medical factors, quality of life data in metastatic breast cancer patients was found to be prognostic and predictive of survival time. Psychological distress-anxiety and depression were found to be common among breast cancer patients even years after the disease diagnosis and treatment. Psychological factors also were found to predict subsequent quality of life or even overall survival in breast cancer patients. Supportive care-clinical treatments to control emesis, or interventions such as counseling, providing social support and exercise could improve quality of life. Symptoms-Pain, fatigue, arm morbidity and postmenopausal symptoms were among the most common symptoms reported by breast cancer patients. As recommended, recognition and management of these symptoms is an important issue since such symptoms impair health-related quality of life. Sexual functioning-breast cancer patients especially younger patients suffer from poor sexual functioning that negatively affect quality of life.

Conclusion

There was quite an extensive body of the literature on quality of life in breast cancer patients. These papers have made a considerable contribution to improving breast cancer care, although their exact benefit was hard to define. However, quality of life data provided scientific evidence for clinical decision-making and conveyed helpful information concerning breast cancer patients' experiences during the course of the disease diagnosis, treatment, disease-free survival time, and recurrences; otherwise finding patient-centered solutions for evidence-based selection of optimal treatments, psychosocial interventions, patient-physician communications, allocation of resources, and indicating research priorities were impossible. It seems that more qualitative research is needed for a better understanding of the topic. In addition, issues related to the disease, its treatment side effects and symptoms, and sexual functioning should receive more attention when studying quality of life in breast cancer patients.

Quality of life as a potential predictor for morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The association between HRQL measures with outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is unclear.

METHODS

Baseline and 12-week HRQL was collected using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P). Outcomes included: (1) survival; (2) time to disease progression and (3) time to bone pain. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used. The relative predictive performance of each HRQL instrument and domain was compared.

RESULTS

Baseline HRQL scores and 12-week change scores > the median were significant predictors of all clinical outcomes but varied by domain. For example, the hazard of death for a change in FACT-P Grand Total Score > median was 49% of the hazard for a change < or = the median. Including baseline or 12-week change in HRQL resulted in improvement in prediction performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with better baseline HRQL have better predicted survival, time to disease progression and pain prognosis than those with worse HRQL. In addition, the 12-week change in HRQL appears to improve predictive accuracy for most clinical outcomes. It appears that greater deterioration in HRQL is prognostic for rapid disease progression.

Prognostic factors in patients with recently diagnosed incurable cancer: a systematic review

GOALS OF WORK

To review the literature and develop a conceptual framework about prognostic factors for people presenting to medical oncologists with recently diagnosed incurable cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline was searched from January 2000 to October 2003 to identify articles testing associations between clinical or laboratory variables and survival time in adults with advanced solid tumours and median survival of 3 to 24 months. We recorded how frequently prognostic factors were significantly associated with survival in univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

There were 53 studies included. The factors associated with survival were organised into four categories related to attributes of the host the tumour, the treatment and the interactions between host, tumour and treatment (symptoms, quality of life, performance status and laboratory tests). Co-morbidity was consistently associated with shorter survival. Age and gender were not consistently associated with survival duration, except in lung cancer where females survived longer. Tumour-related factors associated with shorter survival included primary tumour (lung), metastatic site (liver, brain and visceral) and disease extent. Symptoms associated with shorter survival included those of the anorexia-cachexia syndrome, dyspnoea, pain and impaired physical well being. Performance status was strongly associated with survival in most studies. Laboratory tests associated with shorter survival included anaemia, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminaemia and elevated serum levels of both alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer can be conceptualised as attributes of the host, tumour, treatment and interactions between the three reflected in symptoms, quality of life performance status and laboratory tests.

A demographic and prognostic approach to defining the end of life

Studies examining individuals' preferences reflect a broad consensus that the end of life is a period during which medical care should be different from that in other periods in patients' lives. More specifically, patients, families, and health care providers believe that medical care during this unique period should be home-based and focused on ameliorating patient symptoms through minimally invasive means rather than hospital-based acute care, and focused on extending life through invasive approaches. Of great concern is that other, empirical research shows that there is a large disparity between these preferred types of medical care at the end of life and the actual patterns of medical care that is observed before death, with most patients dying in acute-care hospitals while receiving invasive therapies. Without prospective recognition of this period, medical care cannot be appropriately changed. Existing research suggests that there are few clinical tools available to health care providers to aid in making prognostic estimates. Opportunities for future research include efforts to improve the prospective identification of the end of life and communication about the end of life. Specifically, development of valid and reliable predictive algorithms to help patients, families, and health care providers to identify the beginning of the end of life would be welcomed and should ideally be focused at the population level to ensure wide applicability. Similarly, research that works to improve communication between patients and health care providers on the matter of prognosis is also needed.

Predicting survival in terminal cancer patients: clinical observation or quality-of-life evaluation?

INTRODUCTION

This study compares the relative prognostic power of clinical variables and quality-of-life (QoL) measures in a population of terminal cancer patients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study in 58 Italian Palliative Care Units. Of the 601 randomly selected terminal cancer patients, 574 were followed until death in order to compare clinical and QoL variables (using the Therapy Impact Questionnaire (TIQ) as predictors of survival, and assess whether their combined implementation makes prediction more accurate.

RESULTS

The clinical variables most strongly associated with survival were dyspnoea, cachexia, Katz's ADL, oliguria, dysphagia, dehydration, liver and acute kidney failure and delirium (hazard ratios (HR) ranging from 2.10 to 3.01). Only the first four kept their strength once introduced in the Cox model (HRs ranging from 1.95 to 2.22). In the TIQ primary scale the strongest predictors were physical wellbeing, fatigue, functional status and cognitive status (HRs ranging from 1.42 to 1.71), but only fatigue showed an independent prognostic relevance (90% of selection). In the TIQ global scales, the Physical Symptom Index showed a stronger association with survival (HR 1.71) than the Therapy Impact Index (HR 1.47). The former marginally improved the prognostic power of the model when added to clinical variables. Internal validation confirmed that the results were not spurious.

CONCLUSIONS

In terminal cancer patients, clinical variables are better predictors of survival than QoL. The large residual variability not accounted for by the model (approximately 70%) suggests that survival is also influenced by factors unlikely to be identified in a survey.

Measuring quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review of reliable and valid instruments available in Japan

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the availability and psychometric properties of instruments to measure quality of life (QOL) in clinical research on Japanese patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this systematic review is to find reliable and valid instruments available in Japan, and to summarize their characteristics.

METHODS

Instruments available in Japan were found through a systematic search of the literature. Each instrument identified was evaluated for item development, reliability, validity, interpretability and utility.

RESULTS

Six questionnaires to measure health-related QOL (the QOL-ACD, the EORTC QLQ-C30, the EORTC QLQ-BR23, the FACT-B, the SF-36, the WHO/QOL-26) and five scales to quantify the psychological burden (the STAI, the POMS, the SDS, the HADS, the GHQ), for which reliability and validity have been documented, are available in Japanese. All instruments were developed in foreign countries except for the QOL-ACD. Two of the QOL questionnaires were specific to breast cancer (the EORTC QLQ-BR23, the FACT-B). Though the measurements can be interpreted in some manner, the meaning of change scores over time has been documented for only three instruments (the EORTC QLQ-C30, the FACT-B, and the GHQ).

CONCLUSIONS

The review provides grounds for designing and implementing quantitative research on QOL of breast cancer patients in Japan. Methodological challenges, however, continue, particularly for validating instruments with regard to various study populations of Japanese people and demonstrating the clinical importance of change scores.

Complexities in prognostication in advanced cancer: "to help them live their lives the way they want to"

Predicting survival and disclosing the prediction to patients with advanced disease, particularly cancer, is among the most difficult tasks that physicians face. With the de-emphasis of prognosis in favor of diagnosis and therapeutics in the medical literature, physicians may have difficulty finding the survival information they need to make appropriate estimates of survival for patients who develop cancer. Quite separate from the challenge of estimating survival accurately, physicians may also find the process of disclosing the prognosis to their patients difficult. Using the vignette of a real patient with advanced cancer who far outlived her physician's prognostic estimate, we discuss clinical issues related to the science of prognosis in advanced cancer and the art of its disclosure.

Breast cancer management: quality-of-life and cost considerations

The purpose of this article was to provide a literature-based extensive overview of the quality-of-life and cost issues posed by the management of breast cancer. Incidence and mortality rates vary widely in different countries. Breast cancer accounts approximately for one-fifth of all deaths in women aged 40-50 years. The 1994-1998 incidence rate in the US population was on average 114.3 per 100 000 women. Treatment options include surgery, radiotherapy and drug therapy (cytotoxic and endocrine drugs). All treatment options affect patients' health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in various ways. The use of cytotoxic agents has a particularly large HR-QOL impact. HR-QOL questionnaires are complex tools, not routinely used in breast cancer trials.Worldwide, around 10 million individuals develop cancer each year; this figure is expected to increase to 15 million in 2020. For all cancers, the total economic burden of this disease worldwide was projected by the authors to be in the range of $US 300-400 billion in 2001 (about $US 100-140 billion as direct costs and the remainder as indirect costs [morbidity and mortality]). According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), the total cost of cancer was estimated at $US 156.7 billion in 2001 in US ($US 56.4 billion as direct costs, $US 15.6 as indirect morbidity costs, and $US 84.7 billion as indirect mortality costs). Based on limited information, in the US, breast cancer can be projected to account for about one-fifth/one-fourth of the total cost of cancer. Breast cancer treatment costs are higher in the US than in other developed countries. Both direct and indirect costs are dependent on disease stage. The per-patient costs for initial care in 1992 were estimated at $US 10 813, for continuing care at $US 1084 and for terminal care at $US 17 886. Stage-specific costs provide information for cost-effectiveness analyses of cancer-control initiatives, such as screening programmes. Economic studies on breast cancer are heterogeneous, and the cost estimates made are not easily generalisable. The cost of treatment for breast cancer in developing countries is < or =5% of that in developed regions.

Strategies for improving quality of life in older patients with metastatic breast cancer

Given both the increase in the mean age of the population of Western countries and the high incidence of breast cancer beyond the age of 65 years, it is evident that breast cancer in older women will be a very common problem for the medical oncologist. Metastatic breast cancer is still not amenable to a cure; therefore quality of life during therapy is an important issue, which until recently has been poorly investigated. Similarly, despite recent advances in breast cancer therapy, physicians have been reluctant to enrol older patients in clinical trials, and there is a lack of data regarding this population. This review focuses on quality-of-life issues during metastatic breast cancer treatment in geriatric patients, comparing the standard therapeutic options and newer approaches. Although first-line endocrine therapy with tamoxifen remains a standard treatment, the newer third-generation aromatase inhibitors provide similar or better efficacy with fewer adverse effects and a better quality of life. It has been a common belief that chemotherapy impairs quality of life, but recent studies in advanced breast cancer have shown that this therapy has a positive effect on quality of life, at least in responders. Consequently, chemotherapy should not be denied to elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer, provided a prior geriatric assessment is performed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio. New chemotherapy strategies, such as the taxanes and orally administered chemotherapy, represent a very attractive alternative for a better quality of life in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.