Treatment of hydrocephalus with functionally isolated ventricles

Chronic Pediatric Headache as a Manifestation of Shunt Over-Drainage and Slit Ventricle Syndrome in Patients Harboring a Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion System: A Narrative Literature Review

The main subject of the current review is a specific subtype of headache, which is related to shunt over-drainage and slit ventricle syndrome, in pediatric patients harboring an implanted shunt device for the management of hydrocephalus. This clinical entity, along with its impairment regarding the quality of life of the affected individuals, is generally underestimated. This is partly due to the absence of universally agreed-upon diagnostic criteria, as well as due to a misunderstanding of the interactions among the implicated pathophysiological mechanisms. A lot of attempts have been performed to propose an integrative model, aiming at the determination of all the offending mechanisms of the shunt over-drainage syndrome, as well as the determination of all the clinical characteristics and related symptomatology that accompany these secondary headaches. This subcategory of headache, named postural dependent headache, can be associated with nausea, vomiting, and/or radiological signs of slim ventricles and/or subdural collections. The ultimate goal of our review is to draw clinicians' attention, especially that of those that are managing pediatric patients with permanent, long-standing, ventriculoperitoneal, or, less commonly, ventriculoatrial shunts. We attempted to elucidate all clinical and neurological characteristics that are inherently related to this type of headache, as well as to highlight the current management options. This specific subgroup of patients may eventually suffer from severe, intractable headaches, which may negatively impair their quality of daily living. In the absence of any other clinical condition that could be incriminated as the cause of the headache, shunt over-drainage should not be overlooked. On the contrary, it should be seriously taken into consideration, and its management should be added to the therapeutic armamentarium of such cases, which are difficult to be handled.

Risk factors, treatment, and outcome in dogs and cats with subdural hematoma and hemispheric collapse after ventriculoperitoneal shunting of congenital internal hydrocephalus

BACKGROUND

Overshunting and hemispheric collapse are well-known complications after ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) implantation. Risk factors that predispose to overshunting, treatment options, and prognosis after therapeutic intervention have not been described.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

To identify preoperative risk factors for overshunting, the effect of surgical decompression, and their outcomes.

ANIMALS

Seventy-five dogs and 7 cats.

METHODS

Retrospective case cohort study. Age, breed, sex, body weight, number of dilated ventricles, ventricle brain ratio, intraventricular pressure, and implanted pressure valve systems were evaluated as possible risk factors.

RESULTS

Overshunting had a prevalence of 18% (Cl 95% 9.9-26.66). An increase of 0.05 in VBR increased the risk of overshunting by OR 2.23 (Cl 95% 1.4-3.5; P = .001). Biventricular hydrocephalus had the highest risk for overshunting compared to a tri- (OR 2.48 with Cl 95% 0.5-11.1) or tetraventricular hydrocephalus (OR 11.6 with Cl 95% 1.7-81.1; P = .05). There was no influence regarding the use of gravitational vs differential pressure valves (P > .78). Overshunting resulted in hemispheric collapse, subdural hemorrhage, and peracute deterioration of neurological status in 15 animals. Subdural hematoma was removed in 8 dogs and 2 cats with prompt postoperative improvement of clinical signs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Biventricular hydrocephalus and increased VBR indicate a higher risk for overshunting. The use of differential valves with gravitational units has no influence on occurrence of overshunting related complications and outcomes. Decompressive surgery provides a favorable treatment option for hemispheric collapse and has a good outcome.

Management of Slit Ventricle Syndrome: A Single-Center Case Series of 32 Surgically Treated Patients

OBJECTIVE

Slit ventricle syndrome (SVS) is an iatrogenic disease occurring in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. This article reports the management modalities and results in a case series from a single center.

METHODS

We reviewed a series 48 hospitalized patients with severe SVS whom we managed in a 10-year period. Thirty-seven patients harboring programmable valves (P-valves) first underwent attempts at valve reprogramming. This treatment produced no effect in 21 patients, who therefore required surgical treatment. Surgery was also required by 11 patients without P-valve. Accordingly, 32 patients had to be operatively treated by shunt externalization followed by valve replacement or endoscopic third ventriculostomy basing on intracranial pressure and ventricular size. The new valve was either ProGav Mietke (Aesculap) or Medos Codman (Integra), each equipped with its own antisiphon system. In selected cases, a programmable antisiphon system (ProSa Mietke) was used.

RESULTS

Surgical mortality was 3% and major morbidity accounted for 6%. Complete resolution was obtained in 55% of cases, improvement in 32%, and no effect or worsening in 13%. Only 1 patient became shunt free after endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Medos and ProGrav provided comparable outcomes, whereas ProSa was determinant in selected cases. Pediatric age, uncomplicated shunt courses, and short SVS histories were significantly favorable indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

SVS management remains problematic. However, this study individuated factors that may improve the outcome, such as wider use of P-valves to treat hydrocephalus, timely diagnosis of overdrainage, and earlier and more aggressive indications to manage SVS.

Slit ventricle syndrome: Historical considerations, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment review

After the introduction of shunt treatment for the management of childhood hydrocephalus, a wide variety of complications related to this treatment modality have been recognized. The entity of slit ventricle syndrome (alternatively, symptomatic ventricular coaptation) is one of them, is frequently encountered in the pediatric population and its symptom complex resembles that of shunt failure. We conducted research on PubMed^®, MEDLINE^®, and Web of Science^®, using the keywords: “slit ventricles,” “slit ventricle syndrome,” “SVS” and “ventricular coaptation.” The aim of our review was to trace the advances made through the past decades, concerning our knowledge about the clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatment options of this entity. The discrepancy among researchers about the offending etiology and the optimum treatment algorithm of this entity, as well as the necessity of an updated concept regarding shunt over drainage is analyzed. The multiple treatment modalities proposed and pathophysiologic mechanisms implicated for the treatment of slit ventricle syndrome illustrate the complexity of this entity. Consequently, the issue requires more detailed evaluation. In this review, we comment on all the main facets related to shunt over drainage and the resultant slit ventricle syndrome.

Shunt Overdrainage: Reappraisal of the Syndrome and Proposal for an Integrative Model

Although shunt overdrainage is a well-known complication in hydrocephalus management, the problem has been underestimated. Current literature suggests that the topic requires more examination. An insight into this condition is limited by a lack of universally agreed-upon diagnostic criteria, heterogeneity of published series, the multitude of different management options and misunderstanding of relationships among pathophysiological mechanisms involved. We carried out a review of the literature on clinical, radiological, intracranial pressure (ICP), pathophysiological and treatment concepts to finally propose an integrative model. Active prophylaxis and management are proposed according to this model based on determination of pathophysiological mechanisms and predisposing factors behind each individual case. As pathophysiology is progressively multifactorial, prevention of siphoning with gravitational valves or antisiphon devices is mandatory to avoid or minimize further complications. Shunt optimization or transferal and neuroendoscopy may be recommended when ventricular collapse and cerebrospinal fluid isolation appear. Cranial expansion may be useful in congenital or acquired craniocerebral disproportion and shunting the subarachnoid space in communicating venous hydrocephalus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Hydrocephalus caused by unilateral foramen of Monro obstruction: A review on terminology

Background:

Hydrocephalus caused by unilateral foramen of Monro (FM) obstruction has been referred to in literature by many different terminologies. Precise terminology describing hydrocephalus confined to just one lateral ventricle has a very important prognostic value and determines whether or not the patient can be shunt free after an endoscopic procedure.

Methods:

Aiming to define the best term for unilateral FM obstruction, 19 terms were employed on PubMed database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) as quoted phrases.

Results:

A total of 194 articles were found. Four patterns of hydrocephalus were discriminated as a result of our research term query and were divided by types for didactic purpose. Type A - partial dilation of the lateral ventricle; Type B - pure unilateral obstruction of the FM; Type C - previously shunted patients with secondary obstruction of the FM; and Type D - asymmetric lateral ventricles with patent FM.

Conclusion:

In unilateral FM obstruction hydrocephalus, an in-depth review on terminology application is critical to avoid mistakes that may compromise comparisons among different series. This terminology review suggests that Type B hydrocephalus, i.e., the hydrocephalus confined to just one lateral ventricle with no other sites of cerebrospinal fluid circulation blockage, are best described by the terms unilateral hydrocephalus (UH) and monoventricular hydrocephalus, the first being by far the most popular. Type A hydrocephalus is best represented in the literature by the terms uniloculated hydrocephalus and loculated ventricle; Type C hydrocephalus by the terms isolated lateral ventricle and isolated UH; and Type D hydrocephalus by the term asymmetric hydrocephalus.