1
|
Salem MA, Ghoneim M, Ahmed SS, Elsobki A, Elzhzahy AA, Hemdan A. Endoscopic transcanal coblation excision of glomus tympanicum: a novel technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:4657-4664. [PMID: 38689036 PMCID: PMC11393188 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08660-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of coblation in excision of glomus tympanicum tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study carried out over 28 patients with types I and II glomus tympanicum tumors according to GLASSCOCK-JACKSON classification. Preoperative radiological and endocrinal evaluation were performed. All patients underwent endoscopic transcanal excision of their glomus tympanicum tumors using coblation. RESULTS None of the patients developed recurrence during the 1-year follow up period proved radiologically. None of the patients developed facial palsy postoperatively. Differences between preoperative and postoperative dizziness and taste disturbance were statistically non-significant. Tinnitus disappeared completely in 22 patients postoperatively. A statistically significant reduction in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) after surgery was found. Statistically significant reductions in postoperative air conduction (AC) threshold and air bone gap (ABG) were recorded while bone conduction (BC) threshold showed statistically non-significant change. CONCLUSION Coblation is an effective and safe tool in excision of glomus tympanicum tumors. Further studies comparing coblation with laser and piezosurgery are strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Abdelbadie Salem
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, El-Gomhoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mahitab Ghoneim
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, El-Gomhoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Sally Sameh Ahmed
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, El-Gomhoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Elsobki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, El-Gomhoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Abdoo Elzhzahy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, El-Gomhoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Hemdan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, El-Gomhoria Street, Mansoura, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Molina-Romero OI, Fonnegra-Caballero A, Diez-Palma JC, Segura-Hernández A, Rodriguez-Noreña V, Segura-Hernández G, Corredor-Torres V, Rojas-Ortiz MC, Useche-Aroca D, Fonnegra-Pardo JR. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the management of glomus jugulare tumors: A systematic review and report of the experience of a radioneurosurgery unit in Latin America. Surg Neurol Int 2024; 15:78. [PMID: 38628524 PMCID: PMC11021112 DOI: 10.25259/sni_866_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs) are rare and mainly affect women between the 5th and 6th decades of life. Its localization and anatomic relationships make conventional surgical treatment difficult and with a considerable risk of complications. This manuscript aims to describe the results of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR) in patients with GJT treated in a single center in Latin America, as well as to systematically review the literature to determine the clinical and radiological effectiveness of this technique. Methods A search of information from January 1995 to June 2023 was performed. Twenty-two articles reporting 721 GJT patients treated with GKR were included in the study. Variables such as symptomatic control, control of tumor size, and complications were evaluated. These variables were described using measures of central tendency and proportions. For the institutional experience, 77 patients with GJT tumors were included in the study. Pre-treatment clinical variables and follow-up data were collected from medical charts and phone interviews. The Short Form-36 scale was applied to assess the quality of life. The data were analyzed using the statistical program STATA17.0. Results A total of 721 patients were considered. The median of patients included in these studies was 18.5. The mean age was 58.4 years. The median of symptom control was 89%, and the median of imaging control was 95.7%. In our institution, 77 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 53.2 years. The median hospital stay was 4.92 hours. For the clinical follow-up, information on 47 patients was obtained. An improvement in pre-treatment symptoms was described in 58%, with general symptomatic control of 97%. The tumor-control rate was 95%, and there were statistically significant differences in six of the nine Short Form-36 scale domains. Conclusion GKR is an effective, safe, and cost-effective technique that offers a high degree of symptomatic and tumor size control in patients with GJT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar I. Molina-Romero
- Department or Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, Fundación Clínica Shaio, Bogotá, Colombia
- Neurosurgery Program, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dharnipragada R, Butterfield JT, Dhawan S, Adams ME, Venteicher AS. Modern Management of Complex Tympanojugular Paragangliomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 170:149-156.e3. [PMID: 36400356 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tympanojugular paragangliomas (TJPs) are slow-growing tumors arising within the middle ear or jugular foramen. The development of modified skull base approaches and the increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery have provided more modern techniques in the management of TJPs. Several factors dictating approach selection, and resulting clinical outcomes have been inconsistently described. METHODS A systematic review of the literature describing modern management of complex TJPs was performed and summarized. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to describe the rate of tumor control, complications, and symptom improvement in patients undergoing radiosurgery or surgical resection. RESULTS Nineteen studies were identified with a total of 852 TJP patients. A minority (153 patients) underwent radiosurgery while 699 underwent surgery. On meta-analysis, there was a 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5%-6.4%) tumor growth rate following radiosurgery and 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8%-6.0%) recurrence rate in surgical resection, with no significant moderator effect between the 2 groups (P = 0.9046). Complication rate for radiosurgery was 7.6% (95% CI: 2.8%-12.4%), differing significantly from surgical complication rates of 29.6% (95% CI: 17.1-42.0%, P = 0.0418). CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic radiosurgery and surgical resection for TJPs have similar rates of tumor recurrence. Radiation is associated with less risk and lower morbidity, yet there is comparably modest reduction of the tumor size. In sum, the data suggest that radiosurgery is a reasonable management option for patients with minimal symptoms who are high risk for surgery. Microsurgical resection should be reserved for patients with lower cranial neuropathies or those who have failed radiation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Dharnipragada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - John T Butterfield
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sanjay Dhawan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Meredith E Adams
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrew S Venteicher
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ong V, Bourcier AJ, Florence T, Mozaffari K, Mekonnen M, Sheppard JP, Duong C, Ding K, Yang I. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Glomus Jugulare Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2022; 162:e49-e57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
5
|
Less common extracerebral tumors. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2022; 268:279-302. [PMID: 35074086 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
This chapter examines the results of GKNS on a variety of extraparenchymal skull base tumors some benign and some malignant. For the benign tumors there is good evidence on the effectiveness of the method for pretty much all diagnoses. For malignant extraparenchymal tumors the results are more limited and GKNS only has a supportive role in these lesions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hellinger RL, Wolf A, Blach L, Kleinberg LR, Coy S. Long-Term Results of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Glomus Tumors: An Analysis of 32 Patients. Cureus 2021; 13:e18095. [PMID: 34692309 PMCID: PMC8525443 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glomus jugulare tumors are rare slow-growing hypervascular tumors that arise from the paraganglia of the chemoreceptor system within the jugulare foramen of the temporal lobe. The historical standard treatment has been surgical resection, but because of their high vascularity and involvement with cranial nerves (CNs), Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been advocated as an alternative. The goal of this study is to update and report long-term results of GKRS to achieve local control and symptomatic improvement and to reduce morbidity and mortality when treating glomus jugulare tumors. Materials and Methods This study retrospectively collected and reviewed clinical and radiographic data of 32 patients with glomus jugulare tumors treated with GKRS at the Miami Neuroscience Center, South Miami, FL, from 1995 to 2019. For the 32 patients, the mean volume treated was 13.9 cc (0.23 to 40.0 cc), with an average of 8.6 isocenters. The median prescription dose was 12.84 Gy ± 2.07 Gy (range: 10-20 Gy). Follow-up data were available for 29 out of 32 patients, with a median clinical follow-up time of 37.3 months (range: 4.3-169.1 months). At follow-up, patients were evaluated for neurological signs and symptoms and radiographic evidence of progression of disease. Results The median age of the cohort treated with GKRS was 60 years (range: 14-83 years). There were three males and 27 females. Presenting symptomatology was available for 30 out of 32 patients. The most common presenting symptom was hearing loss (21/30) and the most common CN deficit was in CN VIII (19/30). Out of 29 of the patients followed up, 28 patients had improvement (20/29) or resolution (8/29) of symptoms. At the most recent evaluation or contact, patients were without symptomatic progression of CN deficits. Radiographic tumor control was achieved in 28 out of 29 patients. One patient had a recurrence seven years after GKRS, which was treated with surgery. There were no complications, radionecrosis, or mortality reported from GKRS. Conclusion These data confirm that GKRS is a reasonable upfront treatment option for glomus jugulare tumors. GKRS should be considered more frequently given its excellent long-term local control with low morbidity and risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aizik Wolf
- Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Center at Larkin, South Miami, USA
| | - Laurie Blach
- Radiation Oncology, Miami Neuroscience Center at Larkin, South Miami, USA
| | | | - Sammie Coy
- Allergy and Immunology, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami Neuroscience Center, South Miami, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ehret F, Kufeld M, Fürweger C, Haidenberger A, Schichor C, Lehrke R, Fichte S, Senger C, Bleif M, Rueß D, Ruge M, Tonn JC, Muacevic A, Hempel JM. Image-guided robotic radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors-Multicenter experience and review of the literature. Head Neck 2020; 43:35-47. [PMID: 32851752 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs) are challenging to treat due to their vascularization and location. This analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of image-guided robotic radiosurgery (RRS) for GJTs in a multicenter study and reviews the existing radiosurgical literature. METHODS We analyzed outcome data from 101 patients to evaluate local control (LC), changes in pretreatment deficits, and toxicity. Moreover, radiosurgical studies for GJTs have been reviewed. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 35 months, the overall LC was 99%. Eighty-eight patients were treated with a single dose, 13 received up to 5 fractions. The median tumor volume was 5.6 cc; the median treatment dose for single-session treatments is 16 Gy, and for multisession treatments is 21 Gy. Fifty-six percentage of patients experienced symptom improvement or recovered entirely. CONCLUSIONS RRS is an effective primary and secondary treatment option for GJTs. The available literature suggests that radiosurgery is a treatment option for most GJTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christoph Fürweger
- European Cyberknife Center, Munich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Christian Schichor
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carolin Senger
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Bleif
- Radiochirurgicum/CyberKnife Südwest, Göppingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Rueß
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ruge
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - John-Martin Hempel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fatima N, Pollom E, Soltys S, Chang SD, Meola A. Stereotactic radiosurgery for head and neck paragangliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 44:741-752. [PMID: 32318920 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01292-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) are rare, usually benign hyper vascularized neuroendocrine tumors that traditionally have been treated by surgery, with or without endovascular embolization, or, more recently stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of our study is to determine the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of SRS for treatment of HNPs. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed, and 37 articles reporting 11,174 patients (1144 tumors) with glomus jugulare (GJT: 993, 86.9%), glomus tympanicum (GTT: 94, 8.2%), carotid body tumors (CBTs: 28, 2.4%), and glomus vagale (GVT: 16, 1.4%) treated with SRS definitively or adjuvantly were included. The local control (LC) was estimated from the pooled analysis of the series, and its association with SRS technique as well as demographic and clinical factors was analyzed. The median age was 56 years (44-69 years). With a median clinical and radiological follow-up of 44 months (9-161 months), LC was 94.2%. Majority of the patients (61.0%) underwent Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKS), but there was no statistically significant difference in LC depending upon the SRS technique (p = 0.9). Spearmen's correlation showed that LC was strongly and negatively correlated with multiple parameters, which included female gender (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001), right-sided tumor (r = - 0.3, p = 0.03), primary SRS (r = - 0.5, p ≤ 0.001), and initial clinical presentation of hearing loss (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001). To achieve a LC ≥ 90%, a median marginal dose (Gy) of 15 (range, 12-30 Gy) was required. The results corroborate that SRS in HNPs is associated with good clinical and radiological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Fatima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Bldg, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Erqi Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Scott Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Bldg, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Meola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Bldg, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lior U, Rotem H, Uzi N, Roberto S. LINAC radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors: retrospective - cohort study of 23 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162:839-844. [PMID: 32048040 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04251-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs) are uncommon and locally disruptive tumors that usually arise within the jugular foramen of the temporal bone. Surgery was the treatment of choice up until recently. In the last decades, however, radiosurgery has surfaced as a promising alternative treatment by providing excellent tumor control with low risk of cranial nerve injuries. Our aim was to examine the results of radiosurgery specifically, linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery (LINAC SRS) for GJT treatment. We hypothesized that radiosurgery will reduce the size of the tumor and improve neurological symptoms. DESIGN AND METHOD Between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2013, 30 patients with GJTs were treated in Sheba Medical Center using LINAC SRS treatment. Comprehensive clinical follow-up was available for 23 patients. Sixteen patients were female and seven males with a median age of 64 years, with a range of 18-87 years. In 19 of the patients, LINAC SRS was the primary treatment, whereas in the remaining four cases, surgery or embolization preceded radiosurgery. The median treated dose to tumor margin was 14 Gy (range 12-27 Gy), and the median tumor volume before treatment was 5 ml (range 0.5-15 ml). RESULTS Following the LINAC SRS treatment, 14 of 23 patients (60%) showed improvement of previous neurological deficits, nine patients (40%) remained unchanged. At the end of a follow-up, tumor reduction was seen in 13 patients and a stable volume in eight (91% tumor control rate). Two cases of tumor progression were noted. Three patients (13%) had post- SRS complications during the follow-up, two of which achieved tumor control, while in one the tumor advanced. CONCLUSIONS LINAC SRS is a practical treatment option for GJTs, with a high rate of tumor control and satisfactory neurological improvement.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Martini A, Abbritti RV, Albertini R, Alexandre E, Baro V, Bartolini S, Bernardeschi D, Bivona R, Bonali M, Borghesi I, Borsetto D, Bovo R, Breun M, Calbucci F, Carlson ML, Caruso A, Cayé-Thomasen P, Cazzador D, Champagne PO, Colangeli R, Conte G, D'Avella D, Danesi G, Deantonio L, Denaro L, Di Berardino F, Draghi R, Ebner FH, Favaretto N, Ferri G, Fioravanti A, Froelich S, Giannuzzi A, Girasoli L, Grossardt BR, Guidi M, Hagen R, Hanakita S, Hardy DG, Iglesias VC, Jefferies S, Jia H, Kalamarides M, Kanaan IN, Krengli M, Landi A, Lauda L, Lepera D, Lieber S, Lloyd SLK, Lovato A, Maccarrone F, Macfarlane R, Magnan J, Magnoni L, Marchioni D, Marinelli JP, Marioni G, Mastronardi V, Matthies C, Moffat DA, Munari S, Nardone M, Pareschi R, Pavone C, Piccirillo E, Piras G, Presutti L, Restivo G, Reznitsky M, Roca E, Russo A, Sanna M, Sartori L, Scheich M, Shehata-Dieler W, Soloperto D, Sorrentino F, Sterkers O, Taibah A, Tatagiba M, Tealdo G, Vlad D, Wu H, Zanetti D. Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2019; 39:S1-S146. [PMID: 31130732 PMCID: PMC6540636 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-suppl.1-39-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Zanoletti
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Mazzoni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Martini
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R V Abbritti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - E Alexandre
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - V Baro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - S Bartolini
- Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - D Bernardeschi
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - R Bivona
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Bonali
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - I Borghesi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - D Borsetto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R Bovo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Breun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - F Calbucci
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - M L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A Caruso
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - P Cayé-Thomasen
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Cazzador
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Section of Human Anatomy, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - P-O Champagne
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - R Colangeli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Conte
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D D'Avella
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - G Danesi
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - L Deantonio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - L Denaro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - F Di Berardino
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - R Draghi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - F H Ebner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - N Favaretto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Ferri
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | | | - S Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - L Girasoli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - B R Grossardt
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Guidi
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - R Hagen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - S Hanakita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - D G Hardy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - V C Iglesias
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - S Jefferies
- Oncology Department, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Jia
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - M Kalamarides
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - I N Kanaan
- Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, KSA
| | - M Krengli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - A Landi
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - L Lauda
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - D Lepera
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - S Lieber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - S L K Lloyd
- Department of Neuro-Otology and Skull-Base Surgery Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - A Lovato
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit, Padova University, Treviso, Italy
| | - F Maccarrone
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - R Macfarlane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Magnan
- University Aix-Marseille, France
| | - L Magnoni
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D Marchioni
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | | | - G Marioni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - C Matthies
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D A Moffat
- Department of Neuro-otology and Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Munari
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Nardone
- ENT Department, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - R Pareschi
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - C Pavone
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - G Piras
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Presutti
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - G Restivo
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Reznitsky
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Roca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - A Russo
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Sanna
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Sartori
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - M Scheich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - W Shehata-Dieler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D Soloperto
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | - F Sorrentino
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - O Sterkers
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - A Taibah
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - G Tealdo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - D Vlad
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - H Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - D Zanetti
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel NS, Carlson ML, Pollock BE, Driscoll CLW, Neff BA, Foote RL, Lohse CM, Link MJ. Long-term tumor control following stereotactic radiosurgery for jugular paraganglioma using 3D volumetric segmentation. J Neurosurg 2019; 130:379-387. [PMID: 29652232 DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.jns17764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The morbidity of gross-total resection of jugular paraganglioma (JP) is often unacceptable due to the potential for irreversible lower cranial neuropathy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been used at the authors' institution since 1990 for the treatment of JP and other benign intracranial tumors. Conventional means of assessing tumor progression using linear measurements or elliptical approximations are imprecise due to the irregular shape and insinuating growth pattern of JP. The objective of this study was to assess long-term tumor control in these patients by using slice-by-slice 3D volumetric segmentation of serial MRI data. METHODS Radiographic data and clinical records were reviewed retrospectively at a single, tertiary-care academic referral center for patients treated from 1990 to 2017. Volumetric analyses by integration of consecutive tumor cross-sectional areas (tumor segmentation) of serial MRI data were performed. Tumor progression was defined as volumetric growth of 15% or greater over the imaging interval. Primary outcomes analyzed included survival free of radiographic and clinical progression. Secondary outcomes included new or worsened cranial neuropathy. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for JP at the authors' institution over the last 27 years. Sixty patients had pretreatment and serial posttreatment contrast-enhanced MRI follow-up suitable for volumetric analysis. A total of 214 MR images were analyzed to segment tumor images in a slice-by-slice fashion to calculate integral tumor volume. The median follow-up duration was 66 months (range 7-202 months). At 5 years the tumor progression-free survival rate was 98%. Three tumors exhibited progression more than 10 years after GKRS. Estimated survival free of radiographic progression rates (95% confidence interval [CI]; n = number still at risk) at 5, 10, and 15 years following radiosurgery were 98% (95% CI 94%-100%; n = 34), 94% (95% CI 85%-100%; n = 16), and 74% (95% CI 56%-98%; n = 6), respectively. One patient with tumor progression required treatment intervention using external beam radiation therapy, constituting the only case of clinical progression. Two patients (3%) without preexisting lower cranial nerve dysfunction developed new ipsilateral vocal fold paralysis following radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS SRS achieves excellent long-term tumor control for JP without a high risk for new or worsened cranial neuropathy when used in primary, combined modality, or recurrent settings. Long-term follow-up is critical due to the potential for late radiographic progression (i.e., more than 10 years after SRS). As none of the patients with late progression have required salvage therapy, the clinical implications of this degree of tumor growth have yet to be determined.
Collapse
|
12
|
Spina A, Boari N, Gagliardi F, Bailo M, Del Vecchio A, Bolognesi A, Mortini P. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus tumors: Long-term results in a series of 30 patients. Head Neck 2018; 40:2677-2684. [PMID: 30456888 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glomus tumors are rare and benign hypervascular tumors. Surgery represented the mainstay of their treatment, even if it has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, the treatment shifted to a multimodal approach and Gamma Knife radiosurgery represents one of the treatment options. METHODS Authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological outcome of a series of patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus tumors. RESULTS Thirty patients underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Mean tumor volume was 7.69 cc (range 0.36-24.6). Mean tumor margin dose was 16 Gy (range 13-18). Median follow-up was of 91 months (mean 90; range 11-172). Overall clinical control rate was 100%; overall volumetric tumor control rate was 96.6%. Patients' and tumors' characteristics, treatment data, and outcome have been analyzed. CONCLUSION Gamma Knife radiosurgery represents a safe and effective treatment for glomus tumors. Longer follow-up and larger cohort studies are needed to definitively outline the role of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfio Spina
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Boari
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Del Vecchio
- Service of Medical Physics, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Bolognesi
- Service of Radiation Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sharma M, Meola A, Bellamkonda S, Jia X, Montgomery J, Chao ST, Suh JH, Angelov L, Barnett GH. Long-Term Outcome Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Glomus Jugulare Tumors: A Single Institution Experience of 20 Years. Neurosurgery 2018; 83:1007-1014. [PMID: 29228343 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs) are rare benign tumors, which pose significant treatment challenges due to proximity to critical structures. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcome in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for GJTs through retrospective study. METHODS Forty-two patients with 43 GJTs were treated using Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS; Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) at our institute from 1997 to 2016. Clinical, imaging, and radiosurgery data were collected from an institutional review board approved database. RESULTS Most patients were females (n = 35, 83.3%) and median age was 61 yr (range 23-88 yr). Median tumor volume and diameter were 5 cc and 3 cm, respectively, with a median follow-up of 62.3 mo (3.4-218.6 mo). Overall, 20 patients (47.6%) improved clinically and 14 (33.3%) remained unchanged at last follow-up. New onset or worsening of hearing loss was noted in 6 patients (17.2%) after SRS. The median prescription dose to the tumor margin was 15 Gy (12-18 Gy). Median reduction in tumor volume and maximum tumor diameter at last follow-up was 33.3% and 11.54%, respectively. The 5-yr and 10-yr tumor control rates were 87% ± 6% and 69% ± 13%, respectively. There was no correlation between maximum or mean dose to the internal acoustic canal and post-GK hearing loss (P > .05). CONCLUSION SRS is safe and effective in patients with GJTs and results in durable, long-term control. SRS has lower morbidity than that associated with surgical resection, particularly lower cranial nerve dysfunction, and can be a first-line management option in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur Sharma
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Antonio Meola
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sushma Bellamkonda
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Xuefei Jia
- Department of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joshua Montgomery
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John H Suh
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gene H Barnett
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jansen TTG, Kaanders JHAM, Beute GN, Timmers HJLM, Marres HAM, Kunst HPM. Surgery, radiotherapy or a combined modality for jugulotympanic paraganglioma of Fisch class C and D. Clin Otolaryngol 2018; 43:1566-1572. [DOI: 10.1111/coa.13216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs T. G. Jansen
- Department of otolaryngology and Head & Neck surgery; Radboudumc; Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | | | - Guus N. Beute
- Department of Neurosurgery; St. Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital; Tilburg The Netherlands
| | | | - Henri A. M. Marres
- Department of otolaryngology and Head & Neck surgery; Radboudumc; Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Henricus P. M. Kunst
- Department of otolaryngology and Head & Neck surgery; Radboudumc; Nijmegen The Netherlands
- Department of otology and Head & Neck Surgery; MUMC+Maastricht; the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine treatment outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for glomus jugulare tumors (GJT), focusing on three-dimensional volume change and symptoms before and after SRS, as well as complications related to SRS. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Thirty-eight patients treated with SRS between 2000 and 2015. INTERVENTION SRS treatment of GJT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The tumor volumes on pre- and posttreatment imaging were compared utilizing the Leskell GammaPlan treatment plan software to assess tumor progression. Pre- and posttreatment symptoms, Fisch classification, and complications were recorded. RESULTS The mean radiographic follow-up was 39.1 months. The mean dose-to-tumor margin was 13.2 Gy. The mean tumor size at treatment was 5.8 and 5.2 cm at last follow-up. Thirty-three patients had follow-up imaging suitable for analysis. When defining both 10 and 15% tumor size increases as significant, 27 (82%) and 29 (88%) tumors decreased in size or remained stable, respectively. For the seven tumors with documented pre-SRS growth, treatment success was 86%. The mean marginal dose for treatment success and failure were 13.2 and 13.7 Gy, respectively. Patients receiving a higher margin dose had a greater risk of tumor progression (p = 0.0277). Fisch classification did not impact tumor progression rate. Initial tumor volume had no significance on tumor response to SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS is an effective treatment option for GJT. Both initial tumor volume and Fisch classification did not impact tumor progression. There were no significant patient or lesion characteristics that distinguished treatment success and/or failure.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ibrahim R, Ammori MB, Yianni J, Grainger A, Rowe J, Radatz M. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors: a single-center series of 75 cases. J Neurosurg 2016; 126:1488-1497. [PMID: 27392265 DOI: 10.3171/2016.4.jns152667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Glomus jugulare tumors are rare indolent tumors that frequently involve the lower cranial nerves (CNs). Complete resection can be difficult and associated with lower CN injury. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has established its role as a noninvasive alternative treatment option for these often formidable lesions. The authors aimed to review their experience at the National Centre for Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Sheffield, United Kingdom, specifically the long-term tumor control rate and complications of GKRS for these lesions. METHODS Clinical and radiological data were retrospectively reviewed for patients treated between March 1994 and December 2010. Data were available for 75 patients harboring 76 tumors. The tumors in 3 patients were treated in 2 stages. Familial and/or hereditary history was noted in 12 patients, 2 of whom had catecholamine-secreting and/or active tumors. Gamma Knife radiosurgery was the primary treatment modality in 47 patients (63%). The median age at the time of treatment was 55 years. The median tumor volume was 7 cm3, and the median radiosurgical dose to the tumor margin was 18 Gy (range 12-25 Gy). The median duration of radiological follow-up was 51.5 months (range 12-230 months), and the median clinical follow-up was 38.5 months (range 6-223 months). RESULTS The overall tumor control rate was 93.4% with low CN morbidity. Improvement of preexisting deficits was noted in 15 patients (20%). A stationary clinical course and no progression of symptoms were noted in 48 patients (64%). Twelve patients (16%) had new symptoms or progression of their preexisting symptoms. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial tumor control rate was 92.2% at 5 years and 86.3% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Gamma Knife radiosurgery offers a risk-versus-benefit treatment option with very low CN morbidity and stable long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramez Ibrahim
- National Centre for Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield; and
| | | | - John Yianni
- National Centre for Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield; and
| | - Alison Grainger
- National Centre for Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield; and
| | - Jeremy Rowe
- National Centre for Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield; and
| | - Matthias Radatz
- National Centre for Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield; and
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M. Stereotactic radiosurgery of glomus jugulare tumors: current concepts, recent advances and future perspectives. CNS Oncol 2015; 4:105-14. [PMID: 25768334 DOI: 10.2217/cns.14.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), a very highly focused form of therapeutic irradiation, has been widely recognized as a viable treatment option in the management of intracranial pathologies including benign tumors, malign tumors, vascular malformations and functional disorders. The applications of SRS are continuously expanding thanks to the ever-increasing advances and corresponding improvements in neuroimaging, radiation treatment techniques, equipment, treatment planning and delivery systems. In the context of glomus jugulare tumors (GJT), SRS is being more increasingly used both as the upfront management modality or as a complementary or salvage treatment option. As its safety and efficacy is being evident with compiling data from studies with longer follow-up durations, SRS appears to take the lead in the management of most patients with GJT. Herein, we address current concepts, recent advances and future perspectives in SRS of GJT in light of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Sager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Gn. Tevfik Saglam Cad. 06018, Etlik, Kecioren, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Martín IT, Ávila RDM, Herrera MZ, Arregui G, Osorio-Ceballos JL, Rojas ES, Almansa ÁH, Arrebola JP, Rull JP, Hernández JE, Ramírez EL. Role of radiosurgery in the management of glomus tumors. Head Neck 2015; 38 Suppl 1:E798-804. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Tovar Martín
- Radiation Oncology Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Enrique Saura Rojas
- Neurosurgery Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
| | | | - Juan P. Arrebola
- Radiation Oncology Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP); Granada Spain
| | - Jorge Pastor Rull
- Neuroradiology Department; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital; Granada Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jacob JT, Pollock BE, Carlson ML, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of vestibular schwannoma and glomus jugulare: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2015; 48:515-26. [PMID: 25873444 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKS) has become an important management strategy for an increasing number of patients with skull base tumors. For select patients with lateral skull base disorders, given the proximity to sensitive critical structures such as the brainstem, cranial nerves, and cochlea, this technology has emerged as a first-line treatment to achieve the paramount goals of long-term tumor control and maintenance of existing neurologic function. This article reviews the indications, technique, and results of GKS for the treatment of vestibular schwannoma and glomus jugulare tumors, and highlights our experience in treating these tumors at the Mayo Clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey T Jacob
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Matthew L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Colin L W Driscoll
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Michael J Link
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liscak R, Urgosik D, Chytka T, Simonova G, Novotny J, Vymazal J, Guseynova K, Vladyka V. Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery of the jugulotympanic glomus tumor: long-term results. J Neurosurg 2015; 121 Suppl:198-202. [PMID: 25434953 DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.gks14923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Glomus tumors usually display indolent behavior, and the effectiveness of radiation in stopping their growth can be assessed after long-term follow-up. Currently only midterm results of radiosurgery are available, so the authors included patients treated by Gamma Knife at least 10 years ago in this study to obtain a perspective of long-term results. METHODS During the period from 1992 to 2003, the Gamma Knife was used to treat 46 patients with glomus tumors. The age of the patients ranged from 21 to 79 years (median 56 years). Gamma Knife radiosurgery was the primary treatment in 17 patients (37%). Open surgery preceded radiosurgery in 46% of cases, embolization in 17%, and fractionated radiotherapy in 4%. The volume of the tumor ranged from 0.2 to 24.3 cm(3) (median 3.6 cm(3)). The minimal dose to the tumor margin ranged between 10 and 30 Gy (median 20 Gy). RESULTS One patient was lost for follow-up after radiosurgery. Clinical follow-up was available in 45 patients and 44 patients were followed with MRI in a follow-up period that ranged from 12 to 217 months (median 118 months). Neurological deficits improved in 19 (42%) of 45 patients and deteriorated in 2 patients (4%). Tumor size decreased in 34 (77%) of 44 patients with imaging follow-up, while an increase in volume was observed in 1 patient (2%) 182 months after radiosurgery and Gamma Knife treatment was repeated. One patient underwent another Gamma Knife treatment for secondary induced meningioma close to the glomus tumor 98 months after initial radiosurgical treatment. Seven patients died 22-96 months after radiosurgery (median 48 months), all for unrelated reasons. CONCLUSIONS Radiosurgery has proved to be a safe treatment with a low morbidity rate and a reliable long-term antiproliferative effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Liscak
- Departments of 1 Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gandía-González ML, Kusak ME, Moreno NM, Sárraga JG, Rey G, Álvarez RM. Jugulotympanic paragangliomas treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: a single-center review of 58 cases. J Neurosurg 2014; 121:1158-65. [PMID: 24926654 DOI: 10.3171/2014.5.jns131880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Jugulotympanic paragangliomas (JTPs) are rare benign tumors whose surgical treatment is usually associated with partial resection of the lesion, high morbidity, and even death. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been reported as a useful treatment option. The goal of this retrospective study is to analyze the role of GKRS in tumor volume control and clinical outcomes of these patients. METHODS A total of 75 patients with JTPs were treated with GKRS at the authors' center from 1995 to 2012. The authors analyzed those treated during this period to allow for a minimal observation time of 2 years. The MR images and clinical reports of these patients were reviewed to assess clinical and volumetric outcomes of the tumors. The radiological and clinical assessments, along with a group of prognostic factors measured, were analyzed using descriptive methods. The time to volumetric and clinical progression was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using log-rank statistics and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 86.4 months. The authors observed volumetric tumor control in 94.8% of cases. In 67.2% of cases, tumor volume decreased by a mean of 40.1% from the original size. Of patients with previous tinnitus, 54% reported complete recovery. Improvement of other symptoms was observed in 34.5% of cases. Overall, clinical control was achieved in 91.4% of cases. Previous embolization and familial history of paraganglioma were selected as significant prognostic factors for volumetric response to GKRS treatment in the univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, no factors were significantly correlated with progression-free survival. No patient died of side effects related to GKRS treatment or tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS Gamma Knife radiosurgery is an effective, safe, and efficient therapeutic option for the treatment of these tumors as a first-line treatment or in conjunction with traditional surgery, endovascular treatment, or conventional fractionated radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
23
|
The Role of Wait-and-Scan and the Efficacy of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Temporal Bone Paragangliomas. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35:922-31. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000000386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
24
|
Lieberson RE, Adler JR, Soltys SG, Choi C, Gibbs IC, Chang SD. Stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary treatment for new and recurrent paragangliomas: is open surgical resection still the treatment of choice? World Neurosurg 2012; 77:745-61. [PMID: 22818172 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2010] [Revised: 01/16/2011] [Accepted: 03/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Paragangliomas (PGs) or glomus tumors are rare, and publications comparing treatment alternatives are few. We sought to analyze our experience with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), review the literature, and develop treatment guidelines. METHODS We retrospectively examined the outcomes of 41 PGs in 36 patients treated with SRS at Stanford. Our data from medical records, telephone interviews, and imaging studies were combined with previously reported SRS data and compared to results following other treatments. RESULTS With a median clinical follow-up of 4.8 years (3.9 years radiographic), local control was 100%. Complications included increase in preexistent vertigo in one patient and transient cranial neuropathies in two patients. Published surgical series describe a lower local control rate as well as more frequent and severe complications. Published radiation therapy (RT) series document a slightly lower local control rate than SRS, but SRS can be delivered more quickly and conveniently. Open surgery and other combinations of treatments appear to be required for several subpopulations of PG patients. CONCLUSIONS We feel that SRS should be the primary treatment for most new and recurrent PGs. Even some very large PGs are appropriate for SRS. RT remains an appropriate option in some centers, especially those where SRS is not available. PGs occurring in the youngest patients, catecholamine secreting PGs, and PGs causing rapidly progressing neurologic deficits may be more appropriate for open resection. Metastatic PGs may benefit from combinations of chemotherapy and SRS or RT. Treatment guidelines are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Lieberson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Künzel J, Iro H, Hornung J, Koch M, Brase C, Klautke G, Zenk J. Function-preserving therapy for jugulotympanic paragangliomas: A retrospective analysis from 2000 to 2010. Laryngoscope 2012; 122:1545-51. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.23268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2012] [Accepted: 01/30/2012] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
26
|
Suárez C, Rodrigo JP, Bödeker CC, Llorente JL, Silver CE, Jansen JC, Takes RP, Strojan P, Pellitteri PK, Rinaldo A, Mendenhall WM, Ferlito A. Jugular and vagal paragangliomas: Systematic study of management with surgery and radiotherapy. Head Neck 2012; 35:1195-204. [PMID: 22422597 DOI: 10.1002/hed.22976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2011] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The definitive treatment for head and neck paraganglioma (PG) is surgical excision. Unfortunately, surgery, particularly of vagal paraganglioma (VPG; "glomus vagale") and foramen jugulare ("glomus jugulare") tumors, may be complicated by injuries to the lower cranial nerves, a high price to pay for treatment for a benign tumor. Alternatively these tumors may be followed without treatment, or irradiated. The purpose of this review was to compare the existing evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of surgery, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), for jugular paragangliomas (JPGs) and VPGs. METHODS Relevant articles were reviewed using strict criteria for systematic searches. Forty-one surgical studies met the criteria which included 1310 patients. Twenty articles including 461 patients treated with EBRT, and 14 radiosurgery studies comprising 261 patients were also evaluated. Results were compared between treatment modalities using analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. RESULTS A total of 1084 patients with JPGs and 226 VPGs were treated with different surgical procedures. Long-term control of the disease was achieved in 78.2% and 93.3% of patients, respectively. A total of 715 patients with JPG were treated with radiotherapy: 461 with EBRT and 254 with SRS. Control of the disease with both methods was obtained in 89.1% and 93.7% of the patients, respectively. The treatment outcomes of a JPG treated with surgery or radiotherapy were compared. Tumor control failure, major complication rates, and the number of cranial nerve palsies after treatment were significantly higher in surgical than in radiotherapy series. The results of SRS and EBRT in JPGs were compared and no significant differences were observed in tumor control. Because only 1 article reported on the treatment of 10 VPGs with radiotherapy, no comparisons with surgery could be made. Nevertheless, the vagus nerve was functionally preserved in only 11 of 254 surgically treated patients (4.3%). CONCLUSION There is evidence that EBRT and SRS offer a similar chance of tumor control with lower risks of morbidity compared with surgery in patients with JPGs. Although the evidence is based on retrospective studies, these results suggest that surgery should be considered only for selected cases, but the decision should be individual for every patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Suárez
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Guss ZD, Batra S, Limb CJ, Li G, Sughrue ME, Redmond K, Rigamonti D, Parsa AT, Chang S, Kleinberg L, Lim M. Radiosurgery of glomus jugulare tumors: a meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:e497-502. [PMID: 21703782 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2010] [Revised: 04/22/2011] [Accepted: 05/10/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE During the past two decades, radiosurgery has arisen as a promising approach to the management of glomus jugulare. In the present study, we report on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available published data on the radiosurgical management of glomus jugulare tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS To identify eligible studies, systematic searches of all glomus jugulare tumors treated with radiosurgery were conducted in major scientific publication databases. The data search yielded 19 studies, which were included in the meta-analysis. The data from 335 glomus jugulare patients were extracted. The fixed effects pooled proportions were calculated from the data when Cochrane's statistic was statistically insignificant and the inconsistency among studies was <25%. Bias was assessed using the Egger funnel plot test. RESULTS Across all studies, 97% of patients achieved tumor control, and 95% of patients achieved clinical control. Eight studies reported a mean or median follow-up time of >36 months. In these studies, 95% of patients achieved clinical control and 96% achieved tumor control. The gamma knife, linear accelerator, and CyberKnife technologies all exhibited high rates of tumor and clinical control. CONCLUSIONS The present study reports the results of a meta-analysis for the radiosurgical management of glomus jugulare. Because of its high effectiveness, we suggest considering radiosurgery for the primary management of glomus jugulare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary D Guss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. Current world literature. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 18:466-74. [PMID: 20827086 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0b013e32833f3865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
29
|
Hafez RFA, Morgan MS, Fahmy OM. The safety and efficacy of gamma knife surgery in management of glomus jugulare tumor. World J Surg Oncol 2010; 8:76. [PMID: 20819207 PMCID: PMC2942884 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-8-76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2010] [Accepted: 09/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glomus jugulare is a slowly growing, locally destructive tumor located in the skull base with difficult surgical access. The operative approach is, complicated by the fact that lesions may be both intra and extradural with engulfment of critical neurovascular structures. The tumor is frequently highly vascular, thus tumor resection entails a great deal of morbidity and not infrequent mortality. At timeslarge residual tumors are left behind. To decrease the morbidity associated with surgical resection of glomus jugulare, gamma knife surgery (GKS) was performed as an alternative in 13 patients to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods A retrospective review of 13 residual or unresectable glomus jagulare treated with GKS between 2004 and 2008.. Of these, 11 patients underwent GKS as the primary management and one case each was treated for postoperative residual disease and postembolization. The radiosurgical dose to the tumor margin ranged between 12-15 Gy. Results Post- gamma knife surgery and during the follow-up period twelve patients demonstrated neurological stability while clinical improvement was achieved in 5 patients. One case developed transient partial 7th nerve palsy that responded to medical treatment. In all patients radiographic MRI follow-up was obtained, the tumor size decreased in two cases and remained stable (local tumor control) in eleven patients. Conclusions Gamma knife surgery provids tumor control with a lowering of risk of developing a new cranial nerve injury in early follow-up period. This procedure can be safely used as a primary management tool in patients with glomus jugulare tumors, or in patients with recurrent tumors in this location. If long-term results with GKS are equally effective it will emerge as a good alternative to surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raef F A Hafez
- Neurosurgery and Gamma knife department, International Medical Center, Cairo, Egypt.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen PG, Nguyen JH, Payne SC, Sheehan JP, Hashisaki GT. Treatment of glomus jugulare tumors with gamma knife radiosurgery. Laryngoscope 2010; 120:1856-62. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.21073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
31
|
Guss ZD, Batra S, Li G, Chang SD, Parsa AT, Rigamonti D, Kleinberg L, Lim M. Radiosurgery for glomus jugulare: history and recent progress. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 27:E5. [DOI: 10.3171/2009.9.focus09195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
In this article the authors review the literature for recent studies of radiosurgical treatment for glomus jugulare. These studies demonstrate that radiosurgery results in similar glomus jugulare tumor control and a superior morbidity profile compared with surgical treatment. In addition, patients treated with radiosurgery usually remain stable clinically or improve. Given the indolent nature of these tumors, however, more follow-up is required to ensure that the immediate benefits are lasting. These preliminary reports demonstrate that the use of radiosurgery as a primary treatment for glomus jugulare should be extended to encompass more of the patients who are currently assigned to microsurgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gordon Li
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford; and
| | - Steven D. Chang
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford; and
| | - Andrew T. Parsa
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|