Phase I trial of dose escalation for preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with large brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Single session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection alone for brain metastases larger than 2 cm results in unsatisfactory local control. We conducted a phase I trial for brain metastases(>2cm) to determine the safety of preoperative SRS at escalating doses.

METHODS

Radiosurgery dose was escalated at 3 Gy increments for 3 cohorts based on maximum tumor dimension starting at: 18 Gy for >2-3 cm, 15 Gy for >3-4 cm, and 12 Gy for >4-6 cm. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade III or greater acute toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients/36 lesions were enrolled. For tumor size >2-3 cm, patients were enrolled up to the second dose level (21 Gy); for >3-4 cm and >4-6 cm cohorts the third dose level (21 Gy and 18 Gy, respectively) was reached. There were 2 DLTs in the >3-4 cm arm at 21Gy. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS for >2-3 cm was not reached; and was 18 Gy for both >3-4 cm arm and >4-6 cm arm. With a median follow-up of 64.0 months, the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 85.9% and 76.6%, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 radiation necrosis at 5 months. The 2-year rate of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 0%.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative SRS with dose escalation followed by surgical resection for brain metastases greater than 2 cm in size demonstrates acceptable acute toxicity. The phase II portion of the trial will be conducted at the maximum tolerated SRS doses.

Management of sporadic intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas: A critical review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

The choice of an appropriate strategy for intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma (ICVS) is still debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to compare treatment outcomes amongst management strategies (conservative surveillance (CS), microsurgical resection (MR), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)) aiming to inform guideline recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed manuscripts published between January 1990 and October 2021 referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical studies or case series reporting a cohort of ICVS managed with CS, MR, or SRS. Primary outcome measures included tumor control, the need for additional treatment, hearing outcomes, and posttreatment neurological deficits. These were pooled using meta-analytical techniques and compared using meta-regression with random effect.

RESULTS

Forty studies were included (2371 patients). The weighted pooled estimates for tumor control were 96% and 65% in SRS and CS series, respectively (P < .001). Need for further treatment was reported in 1%, 2%, and 25% for SRS, MR, and CS, respectively (P = .001). Hearing preservation was reported in 67%, 68%, and 55% for SRS, MR, and CS, respectively (P = .21). Persistent facial nerve deficit was reported in 0.1% and 10% for SRS and MR series, respectively (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

SRS is a noninvasive treatment with at least equivalent rates of tumor control and hearing preservation as compared to MR, with the caveat of better facial nerve preservation. As compared to CS, upfront SRS is an effective treatment in achieving tumor control with similar rates of hearing preservation.

The dilemma of radiation necrosis from diagnosis to treatment in the management of brain metastases

Radiation therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for patients with brain metastases. The use of SRS in the management of brain metastases is becoming increasingly common and provides excellent local control. Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is a late complication of radiation treatment that can be seen months to years following treatment and is often indistinguishable from tumor progression on conventional imaging. In this review article, we explore risk factors associated with the development of radiation necrosis, advanced imaging modalities used to aid in diagnosis, and potential treatment strategies to manage side effects.

Using standardized workflows and quantitative data-driven management to reduce time interval from simulation to treatment initiation

PURPOSE

External beam radiotherapy is a complex process, involving timely coordination among multiple teams. The aim of this study is to report our experience of establishing a standardized workflow and using quantitative data and metrics to manage the time-to-treatment initiation (TTI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Starting in 2014, we established a standard process in a radiation oncology-specific electronic medical record system (RO-EMR) for patients receiving external beam radiation therapy in our department, aiming to measure the time interval from simulation to treatment initiation, defined as TTI, for radiation oncology. TTI data were stratified according to the following treatment techniques: three-dimensional (3D) conformal therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney test for the respective metrics of aggregate data for the initial period 2012- 2015 (PI) and the later period 2016-2019 (PII).

RESULT

Over 8 years, the average annual number of treatments for PI and PII were 1760 and 2357 respectively, with 3D, IMRT, and SBRT treatments accounting for 53, 29, 18% and 44, 34, 22%, respectively, of the treatment techniques. The median TTI for 3D, IMRT, and SBRT for PI and PII were 1, 6, 7, and 1, 5, 7 days, respectively, while the 90th percentile TTI for the three techniques in both periods were 5, 9, 11 and 4, 9, 10 days, respectively. From the aggregate data, the TTI was significantly reduced (p = 0.0004, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) from PI to PII for the three treatment techniques.

CONCLUSION

Establishing a standardized workflow and frequently measuring TTI resulted in shortening the TTI during the early years (in PI) and maintaining the established TTI in the subsequent years (in PII).

A Systematic Review Informing the Management of Symptomatic Brain Radiation Necrosis After Stereotactic Radiosurgery and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Recommendations

Radiation necrosis (RN) secondary to stereotactic radiosurgery is a significant cause of morbidity. The optimal management of corticosteroid-refractory brain RN remains unclear. Our objective was to summarize the literature specific to efficacy and toxicity of treatment paradigms for patients with symptomatic corticosteroid-refractory RN and to provide consensus guidelines for grading and management of RN on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society. A systematic review of articles pertaining to treatment of RN with bevacizumab, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), surgical resection, or hyperbaric oxygen therapy was performed. The primary composite outcome was clinical and/or radiologic stability/improvement (ie, proportion of patients achieving improvement or stability with the given intervention). Proportions of patients achieving the primary outcome were pooled using random weighted-effects analysis but not directly compared between interventions. Twenty-one articles were included, of which only 2 were prospective studies. Thirteen reports were relevant for bevacizumab, 5 for LITT, 5 for surgical resection and 1 for hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Weighted effects analysis revealed that bevacizumab had a pooled symptom improvement/stability rate of 86% (95% CI 77%-92%), pooled T2 imaging improvement/stability rate of 93% (95% CI 87%-98%), and pooled T1 postcontrast improvement/stability rate of 94% (95% CI 87%-98%). Subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant improvement favoring treatment with low-dose (below median, ≤7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) versus high-dose bevacizumab with regards to symptom improvement/stability rate (P = .02) but not for radiologic T1 or T2 changes. The pooled T1 postcontrast improvement/stability rate for LITT was 88% (95% CI 82%-93%), and pooled symptom improvement/stability rate for surgery was 89% (95% CI 81%-96%). Toxicity was inconsistently reported but was generally low for all treatment paradigms. Corticosteroid-refractory RN that does not require urgent surgical intervention, with sufficient noninvasive diagnostic testing that favors RN, can be treated medically with bevacizumab in carefully selected patients as a strong recommendation. The role of LITT is evolving as a less invasive image guided surgical modality; however, the overall evidence for each modality is of low quality. Prospective head-to-head comparisons are needed to evaluate the relative efficacy and toxicity profile among treatment approaches.

Impact of Apolipoprotein E Genotype on Neurocognitive Function in Patients With Brain Metastases: An Analysis of NRG Oncology's RTOG 0614

PURPOSE

Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a common treatment for brain metastases and is frequently associated with decline in neurocognitive functioning (NCF). The e4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is associated with increased risk of Alzheimer disease and NCF decline associated with a variety of neurologic diseases and insults. APOE carrier status has not been evaluated as a risk factor for onset time or extent of NCF impairment in patients with brain metastases treated with WBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0614 treated adult patients with brain metastases with 37.5 Gy of WBRT (+/- memantine), performed longitudinal NCF testing, and included an optional blood draw for APOE analysis. NCF test results were compared at baseline and over time with mixed-effects models. A cause-specific Cox model for time to NCF failure was performed to assess the effects of treatment arm and APOE carrier status.

RESULTS

APOE results were available for 45% of patients (n = 227/508). NCF did not differ by APOE e4 carrier status at baseline. Mixed-effects modeling showed that APOE e4 carriers had worse memory after WBRT compared with APOE e4 noncarriers (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised total recall [least square mean difference, 0.63; P = .0074], delayed recognition [least square mean difference, 0.75; P = .023]). However, APOE e4 carrier status was not associated with time to NCF failure (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.60-1.23; P = .40). Memantine delayed the time to NCF failure, regardless of carrier status (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01; P = .054).

CONCLUSIONS

APOE e4 carriers with brain metastases exhibited greater decline in learning and memory, executive function, and the Clinical Trial Battery Composite score after treatment with WBRT (+/- memantine), without acceleration of onset of difference in time to NCF failure.

Emergent radiotherapy for brain and leptomeningeal metastases: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As novel systemic therapies allow patients to live longer with cancer, the risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases increases and providers will more frequently encounter emergent presentation of brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Management of these metastases requires appropriate work-up and well-coordinated multidisciplinary care. We set out to perform a review of emergent radiotherapy (RT) for CNS metastases, specifically focusing on BM and LM.

METHODS

We review the appropriate pathways for workup and initial management of BM and LM, while reviewing the literature supporting emergent treatment of these entities with surgery, systemic anti-cancer therapy, and RT. To inform this narrative review, literature searches in PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted, with preference given to articles employing modern RT techniques, when applicable. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence for management of BM and LM in the emergent setting, discussion was supplemented by the authors' expert commentary.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

This work highlights the importance of surgical evaluation, particularly for patients presenting with significant mass effect, hemorrhagic metastases, or increased intracranial pressure. We review the rare situations where emergent initiation of systemic anti-cancer therapy is indicated. When defining the role of RT, we review factors guiding selection of appropriate modality, treatment volume, and dose-fractionation. Generally, 2D- or 3D-conformal treatment techniques prescribed as 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in 5 fractions, should be employed in the emergent setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BM and LM present from a diverse array of clinical situations, requiring well-coordinated multidisciplinary management, and there is a paucity of high-quality evidence guiding such management decisions. This narrative review aims to more thoroughly prepare providers for the challenging situation of emergent management of BM and LM.

Dosimetric Quality of Artificial Intelligence Based Organ at Risk Segmentation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

to compare dosimetric parameters between Artificial intelligence (AI) generated organ at risks (OAR) and Radiation Oncologist approved OARs and evaluation of appropriateness unedited AI- OARs in routine clinical plan optimization and evaluation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The OARs (lung, spinal cord and heart) for twenty SBRT (stereotactic body radiotherapy) lung CT simulation datasets were derived by AI based segmentation algorithms. These AI- OARs were edited by a staff Radiation Oncologist and then subjected to our SBRT peer-review process at our institution. A SBRT plan based on the approved contours was created. Dosimetric parameters for the unedited AI-OARs and edited physician-approved OARs were then compared.

RESULTS

Lung V20 differences between AI- OAR and physician- OAR varied from 0.01% - 0.7% with a mean value of 0.1% difference (p-value 0.004). Spinal cord D0.03cc varied from 0.02 Gy - 0.9 Gy with a mean value of 0.3 Gy difference (p-value 0.002). Heart D0.03cc varied from 0.01 Gy - 4.3 Gy with mean value 0.9 Gy difference (p-value 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Dosimetric parameters for AI-based lung, spinal cord and heart OARs vs physician approved OARs were different, overall, the differences were generally small. These differences are likely on par with inter-observer differences seen between individual radiation oncologists. Unedited OARs have the promise for routine use in plan optimization and evaluation to further improve efficiency.

Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Brain Metastases from Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Prior studies have reported outcomes for brain metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) primary cancers treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); however, most include a majority of colorectal cancer. Few studies specifically evaluate SRS treatment response for brain metastases from upper GI cancers. We report our institutional outcomes for patients with upper GI cancers who were treated with SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with an upper GI cancer who underwent SRS for brain metastases between 1991 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a single institution IRB-approved database. The primary endpoint was local failure (LF) and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). LF was estimated using the Cumulative Incidence Function with death as a competing risk. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier Method. Predictors of cumulative incidence of LF were assessed using competing risk regression.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with 107 brain metastases were analyzed. Forty-two (86%) patients were male. The median follow-up time was 6.7 months (range: 0.4-61.7 months) and median OS was 7.5 months (range: 0.9-61.7 months). The median Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 80 (range: 40-100). The primary disease site was esophagus in 87 (81%) lesions, pancreas in 10 (9.3%) lesions, stomach in 5 (4.7%) lesions, liver in 2 (1.9%) lesions, gallbladder in 2 (1.9%) lesions, and small intestine in 1 (0.9%) lesion. The median metastasis size was 1.4 cm (range: 0.3-6.7 cm). The median prescription dose and fraction number were 24 Gy (range: 14-30 Gy) and 1 fraction (range: 1-2 fractions), respectively. The cumulative incidence of LF at 6 and 12 months was 5.6% (95% CI: 2.3-11%) and 12% (95% CI: 6.9-20%), respectively. Overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 59% (95% CI: 50-69%) and 35% (95% CI: 27-46%), respectively. On univariate analysis, female gender (HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.61, p = 0.005), Black race (HR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.03-0.23, p = <0.001), and larger tumors (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.78, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with local failure.

CONCLUSION

SRS for brain metastases from upper GI cancers is an appropriate treatment option and provides excellent local control. Unlike prior studies that have reported lower local control rates for all GI cancers with brain metastases treated with SRS, our data show that local failure rates in brain metastases from upper GI cancers specifically are more consistent with previously published data from other disease sites. Further studies evaluating SRS treatment response for brain metastases from GI cancers should separate upper GI and lower GI cancers.

Patient-Free Simulation: Analysis of Hospitalized Patients Treated without CT Simulation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Palliative radiation therapy (RT) can be a necessary element of treatment for hospitalized cancer patients who may be critically ill. We have implemented patient-free simulation machine starts using existing diagnostic imaging for treatment planning, eliminating the need for simulation. We hypothesize machine starts reduce time in the department without detriment to clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS/METHODS

An IRB-approved database of patients receiving RT was queried for hospitalized patients treated with a machine start. Variables including time on machine and in department, and clinical outcomes were collected. A binary clinical endpoint variable indicated whether the goal of RT was achieved (extubation, hemostasis, etc.). A similar cohort of inpatients receiving CT simulation and mediastinal RT was compared with the machine start group. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. Hypothesis testing for proportions was used to compare patients meeting clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were treated with 25 machine starts. The median age was 65 (range 43-82) and median KPS was 50. A total of 15 patients were in the intensive care unit of which 12 were mechanically ventilated (MV). The most common histology was NSCLC (14). RT was most commonly 8-10 Gy in 1 fraction (88%, range 7-30 Gy in 1-10 fractions). Field arrangement was equally weighted AP/PA fields in 84%. Treated sites were mediastinum (17), bone (3), abdomen/pelvis (2), neck (2), and brain (1). Diagnostic CT of the treatment area was obtained a median of 6 days prior to RT (0-57 days). Machine starts within 4 days of admission were significantly more likely to meet the intended clinical endpoint (87% vs 47%, p = 0.02). On day of machine start, patients' median time in the department was 32 minutes (10-141 min). Of machine starts with treatment times available (22), median time in the LINAC vault was 15 minutes (5-31 min). The median shifts from the initial CBCT were 0.9 cm in the superior-inferior direction (0-2.7 cm), left-right 0.9 cm (0-5.9 cm) and anterior-posterior 0.5 cm (0-3 cm). One patient required repeat CBCT after initial shifts. In a similar cohort of patients who underwent CT simulation followed by RT to the mediastinum, the average time in the department was 122 minutes, compared with 45 minutes for machine start patients treated to the mediastinum (p = 0.02). Primary clinical endpoint was achieved in 65% of machine starts. 61% of patients clinically improved and were stable for discharge. Of the MV patients, 42% were successfully extubated and 58% were discharged. Of patients who died (74%), average time to death was 53 days after RT (4-126 days). Among the MV subgroup, 83% died an average of 49 days from RT (4-126 days).

CONCLUSION

Machine starts are a timely and accurate alternative to traditional planning with CT simulation that results in approximately 60% less time in the department. This is an acceptable RT planning technique for a population that demands greater medical attention and resources.

Results of a Phase I Trial of Dose Escalation for Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Large Brain Metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Single session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone for brain metastases larger than 2 cm in diameter results in unsatisfactory local control. Surgical resection alone also produces unreliable local control and perioperative radiation is required. We conducted a prospective phase I trial (NCT01891318) for brain metastases greater than 2 cm to determine the safety of preoperative SRS at escalating doses followed by surgical resection.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Radiosurgery dose started at RTOG 9005 dose levels for the 3 cohorts based on maximum tumor diameter of the index lesion: 18 Gy for >2-3 cm, 15 Gy for >3-4 cm, and 12 Gy >4-6 cm. Concurrent SRS alone to other smaller lesions was allowed using standard RTOG dose. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or greater acute toxicity within 3 to 4 months after SRS. Patients underwent surgical resection within 2 weeks and were followed with imaging and neurological evaluations every 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were enrolled into the trial (see Table 1 below). The median age was 63, and median interval between SRS and surgery was 2 days. The most common histology was non-small cell lung cancer (57.1%), followed by breast cancer (14.3%). For tumor size >2-3 cm, patients were enrolled up to the 2nd dose level (21 Gy); for >3-4 cm and >4-6 cm cohorts the 3rd dose level (21 Gy and 18 Gy, respectively) was reached. There was a total of 3 DLTs: 2 in the >3-4 cm cohort and 1 in the >4-6 cm cohort (Table 1). The maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was 18 Gy (2nd dose level) for >3-4 cm, and 18 Gy (3rd dose level) for >4-6 cm. With a median follow-up of 64 months, the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 88.8% and 79.1%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month distant brain control was 63.1% and 55.3%, respectively. Overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 82.9% and 59.0%. The rate of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) at 2 years was 0%.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative SRS with dose escalation followed by surgical resection for brain metastases greater than 2 cm in size results in local control comparable to postoperative SRS or whole-brain radiation therapy and demonstrates acceptable acute toxicity. The Phase II portion of the trial will be conducted at the maximum tolerated SRS doses.

Three Decade Single-Institution Experience of Safety and Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Young Adult Patients with Medulloblastoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The rarity of medulloblastoma in the adult population limits information on optimal treatment and clinical outcomes. Adjuvant chemoradiation has been correlated to improved overall survival (OS) in a recent National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis. We performed a retrospective safety and efficacy analysis of radiation (RT) +/- adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTH) in young adult patients with medulloblastoma to better understand outcomes, prognostic factors, and possibly optimal treatment strategies.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective chart review on young adult (age ≥18 - 39 years old) patients with medulloblastoma treated at our institution (1992-2018) with a minimum follow-up of 6 months from completion of therapy. We gathered data on patient and disease characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes, including OS, progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and freedom from distant metastasis (FDM). We employed Cox regression model for univariable and multivariable analyses and Kaplan-Meier (KM) test methods for survival analyses, using JMP version 15.0 software.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were treated with postoperative RT including craniospinal irradiation (median dose: 2340 cGy/13 fractions) followed by tumor bed/posterior fossa (median total dose: 5580 cGy/31 fractions) either alone (n = 9; 29%) or with adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTH: n = 22; 71%); mostly as per COG A9961 Regimen A: oral lomustine, intravenous cisplatin, and intravenous vincristine (n = 12). 54.6% (n = 12) were known to complete the full aCTH course. Common RT acute toxicities included G1-2 nausea and/or vomiting (N/V; n = 8) and G1-2 fatigue (n = 6). Common aCTH acute toxicities included G1-2 N/V (n = 7) and peripheral neuropathy: G1-2 (n = 6) and G3 (n = 3). Late adverse events were primarily G1-2 peripheral neuropathy and gait imbalance (22.6%), G1-2 hormonal disturbances (19.4%) and G1-2 neurocognitive impairment (16.1%). Male patients had worse OS, PFS, FDM, and LC. Age at diagnosis, tumor location (lateral vs. central), and completion of aCTH course were shown on uni- and multi-variable analysis to be significantly associated with OS; p<0.05. KM survival analysis revealed superior 10-year PFS and OS in patients who completed aCTH compared to those who received RT alone or did not complete aCTH: 72.9% vs 59.3% vs 42%, p = 0.461, and 74.1% vs 63.5% vs 40%, p = 0.033, respectively. A similar trend was noted for LC and FDM.

CONCLUSION

Our series provides a report of acute and late side effects of treatment of young adult patients with medulloblastoma. Significant OS and PFS advantage are seen of aCTH completion in this patient population. Since optimal treatment of these patients is still an unmet need, prospective studies for this rare disease entity are needed.

Development of an RPA for Prediction of Radiation Necrosis Following Single Fraction Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a potential complication following treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Several risk factors for RN have been reported, but to our knowledge there are no recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) models to identify patients at highest risk for RN. We therefore sought to develop a predictive tool to identify patients at highest risk for the development of RN following single fraction SRS.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients who underwent single fraction SRS for brain metastases from 2017-2021 were identified from a single institutional IRB-approved database. Patients with concern for RN were discussed in a multi-disciplinary setting and a diagnosis of RN was made based on pathologic or radiographic findings. Cox proportional hazards regression was done to identify factors associated with RN. RPA was performed to categorize patients into distinct risk groups for RN. Variables with p<0.1 on univariate analysis from the Cox regression analysis were included in the RPA. Patients with staged SRS, incomplete treatment records, or < 3 months radiographic follow-up were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 1,011 lesions from 283 patients with a median follow-up of 9.7 months. The majority of lesions had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (49%) as the primary site followed by breast (12%) and melanoma (11%). The median prescription dose was 24 Gy (range: 12-24 Gy). RN was diagnosed in 12.2% of lesions, of which 28% (35/123) were symptomatic RN. The median time to RN was 4.9 months. Variables identified for inclusion in the RPA included primary tumor site, use of targeted therapy, tumor location, pre-SRS hemorrhage, post-SRS hemorrhage, prior SRS to other lesions, number of SRS targets, maximum dose, maximum lesion diameter, 70% isodose line, heterogeneity index, conformality index, and gradient index. RPA identified four distinct groups. Group 1 was defined as maximum lesion diameter (MLD) <0.8 cm with primary tumor site other than breast, colorectal (CRC) or NSCLC (n = 174); group 2 was MLD <0.8 cm with breast, CRC, or NSCLC (n = 372). Group 3 was defined as MLD ≥ 0.8 cm without post-SRS hemorrhage (n = 336) and group 4 was MLD ≥0.8 cm with post-SRS hemorrhage (n = 129). Two-year RN free survival for all lesions was 82%, 100% for group 1, 89% for group 2, 76% for group 3, and 58% for group 4.

CONCLUSION

We created the first RPA predictive model for RN following single fraction SRS and identified a subgroup of patients at highest risk. This RPA can help guide clinicians when educating patients on RN risk for brain metastases.

Multi-Institutional Validation of the Recursive Partitioning Analysis for Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Spine Radiosurgery for Spine Metastasis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The recently published spine radiosurgery (sSRS) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for overall survival (OS) separated patients into 3 distinct prognostic groups. We sought to externally validate this RPA using 3 separate multi-institutional datasets.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A total of 444 patients were utilized to develop the recently published sSRS RPA predictive of OS in patients with spine metastases. The RPA identified three distinct prognostic classes. RPA Class 1 was defined as KPS >70 and controlled systemic disease (n = 142); RPA Class 2 was defined as KPS>70 with uncontrolled systemic disease or KPS ≤70, age ≥54 and absence of visceral metastases (n = 207); RPA Class 3 was defined as KPS ≤70 and age <54 years or KPS≤70, age ≥54 years and presence of visceral metastases (n = 95). We utilized data from 3 large tertiary care centers to independently validate this RPA. Data from each institution was utilized independently to validate the RPA to minimize confounding based on institutional differences in patient selection. A total of 1,184 patients (221 patients from institution A, 749 institution B, and 214 from institution C) were in the validation cohort and were divided based on their RPA Class. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and log-rank test was used to compare OS between RPA classes.

RESULTS

In each of the validation cohorts, the median OS was 19.9 months (institution A), 11.0 months (institution B), and 24.4 months (institution C). The patient distribution into RPA classification based on Institution A/B/C was, Class 1 (19.4%, 15.1%, 50.5%), Class 2 (74.7%, 57.7%%, 37.9%), and Class 3 (5.9%, 27.2%%, 11.2%), respectively. The median OS for patients in the validation cohort at Institution A/B/C based on RPA class was Class 1 (54 months, 27.1 months, 50.0 months), Class 2 (15.9 months, 13.0 months, 15.1 months) and Class 3 (6.9 months, 3.5 months, 6.1 months), respectively. Patients in RPA Class 1 had a significantly better OS compared to those in Class 2 of the each of the three external institution validation cohorts (p<0.01). Similarly, patients in RPA Class 2 had a significantly better OS compared to those in Class 3 (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The external datasets from three large institutions independently validated the spine SRS RPA successfully for OS in patients undergoing sSRS for spinal metastases. This is the first RPA for OS to have been externally validated using multiple large datasets. Based on this validation, upfront spine SRS is strongly supported for patients in RPA Class 1 and Class 2 and is also cost effective with median OS >11 months for these patients. Patients in RPA Class 3 would benefit most from upfront conventional radiotherapy given their poor expected survival. Given successful external validation, this RPA helps guide physicians to identify those patients with spinal metastases who most benefit from sSRS.

Investigation of the Relationship between Aperture Use for Treating Small and Shallow Brain Lesions in Proton Therapy with Different Spot Size Variations in Three Proton Therapy Systems

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To compare plan quality among standard vs. aperture-based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) using cyclotron-generated proton beams (CPB), linear accelerator proton beams (LPB), and linear accelerator proton minibeams (LPMB) for multiple brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Fifty-five brain lesions from twenty patients were planned with three different spot size ranges using CPBs (σ: 2.7-7.0 mm) and compared against LPBs (σ: 2.9-5.5 mm), and LPMBs (σ: 0.9-3.9 mm). Apertures with a diameter of 0.3 cm were applied to beams irradiating all tumors < 1 cm3 in volume and any tumor < 2.5 cm depth in the patient and compared against the same patient plans containing no apertures. All plans were optimized with the multi-field optimization (MFO) technique using the Monte Carlo algorithm. Dose coverage to each lesion for each proton plan was set to 99% of the GTV receiving the prescription (Rx) dose for all plans. Robustness with ±2 mm setup uncertainty and ±2% range uncertainty was included in robust evaluation using V100%Rx > 95% of the GTV. Conformity index (CI) and gradient index (GI) were used to analyze the effect of apertures vs. no apertures (standard) for each IMPT plan type. CI was defined as the volume of the 100% isodose line divided by the volume of the GTV + 2 mm expansion to account for robust planning. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was utilized to determine the statistical significance of dosimetric results compared between aperture-based and standard IMPT plans.

RESULTS

When apertures were implemented in the treatment planning for all shallow and small brain lesions, shallow brain tumors showed the most prominent improvement in conformity and gradient index. A 6.7% difference in average conformity was calculated for standard vs. aperture-based plans for LPMBs, followed by a 5.3% improvement for CPBs. Improvement in gradient index for standard vs. aperture-based plans was significant for both shallow and deeper tumors for CPB and LPB plan types, as shown in Table 1 below. CPB and LPB plan gradient indices were statistically significant for comparing aperture-based vs. standard IMPT plans.

CONCLUSION

We successfully quantified plan quality and evaluated results for aperture- vs. standard IMPT plans using CPBs, LPBs, and LPMBs for brain metastases. Plan quality improves the greatest with apertures applied to beams irradiating shallow tumors. Apertures may not be necessary for small, deeper tumors with IMPT.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Prior studies have demonstrated that brain metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) primary cancers have a poorer response to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when compared to patients with other primary sites, with reported local control of 62-74%. We report our institutional outcomes for patients with colorectal primary cancer who were treated with SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with colorectal primary cancer who underwent SRS for brain metastases between 1989 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a single institutional IRB-approved database. The primary endpoint was local failure (LF) and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). LF was estimated using the Cumulative Incidence Function with death as a competing risk. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier Method. Predictors of cumulative incidence of LF were assessed using competing risk regression.

RESULTS

The study population comprised of 109 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma with 207 brain metastases. The median follow-up was 5.2 months (range: 0.4-124 months) and median OS was 5.8 months (range: 0.5-71.2 months). Fifty-two patients (48%) were male and median Karnofsky Performance Status at the time of treatment was 80 (range: 40-100). The median tumor diameter was 1.55 cm (range: 0.17-5.48 cm). The median prescription dose and number of fractions were 24 Gy (range: 11-36 Gy) and 1 fraction (range: 1-3 fractions), respectively. The cumulative incidence of LF at 3, 6, and 12 months was 9.7% (95% CI: 6.1-14%), 22% (95% CI: 16-28%), and 25% (95% CI: 20-31%), respectively. Overall survival at 3, 6, and 12 months was 81% (95% CI: 76-87%), 49% (95% CI: 42-56%) and 24% (95% CI: 18-31%), respectively. On univariate analysis, age was a significant predictor (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), p < 0.001) of LF. Tumor size (HR = 0.80, p = 0.13) and prescription dose (HR = 1.02, p = 0.54) did not predict for LF.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients with brain metastases from colorectal primary cancer treated with SRS. Compared to historical data, LF and OS in our cohort of patients was favorable. Our data confirms relatively higher rates of LF when compared to brain metastases from other primary disease sites. Further studies are warranted to identify factors that predict for LF following SRS and to develop models that predict which patients with colorectal brain metastases may be at higher risk of failure.

Frameless Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: An Institutional Series of 145 Cases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Cobalt-60 stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) typically involves single fraction treatment with frame immobilization. However, large tumor size, proximity to critical structures, and prior radiation treatment sometimes necessitate fractionated SRS with mask immobilization. We present a large institutional experience with fractionated mask-based SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this single-institution, IRB-approved study, all patients treated with mask-based fractionated SRS for brain metastases from March 2017 to January 2023 were identified. The primary outcomes were 1- and 2-year local control (LC) by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with a total of 145 metastases were treated. The median follow-up time was seven months. The median age at treatment was 64.1 years (range: 26-95 years). 55.9% of patients were female. The most common primary tumors were breast (25.5%), non-small cell lung (23.4%), small-cell lung (8.3%), and melanoma (8.3%). For most cases (59.3%), the indication for fractionation was retreatment. Large size (28.3%), critical location (9.7%), and medical comorbidity (2.1%) were other indications. For all cases, the mean maximal linear size was 34.9 mm and mean target volume was 15.6 cc. For cases fractionated due to size, the mean size was 43.9 mm and mean target volume was 23.8 cc. Median total dose was 2,700 cGy (range: 1,620-3,000), and median dose per fraction (fx) was 600 cGy (range: 405-900). The most common prescriptions were 3,000 cGy/5 fx (40.0% of patients) and 2500 cGy in 500 cGy per fraction (37.2% of patients). Mean maximum dose was 4,833 cGy (range: 2,920-7,500). For 75.2% of treatments, the prescription isodose line was 50 to 59% (mean, 56.9%). Target coverage was 100% in all but one case (99%). For lesions near the brainstem, mean brainstem maximum point dose (MPD) was 9.3 Gy ± 9.8 Gy and brainstem mean dose was 3.3 Gy ± 3.3 Gy. For lesions near the optic pathway, mean optic nerve MPD was 14.4 Gy ± 9.2, optic nerve mean dose was 6.4 Gy ± 5.4 Gy, mean optic chiasm MPD was 11.7 Gy ± 7.9 Gy, and optic chiasm mean dose was 5.4 Gy ± 4.7 Gy. 1-year LC was 88.2% and 2-year LC was 80.4%. When retreatments were excluded, 1-year LC was 98.0% and 2-year LC was 98.0%. 18% of patients had acute grade 1-2 toxicities (fatigue, headache, nausea, and/or alopecia), and one patient had acute grade 3 fatigue. There was no other grade 3+ acute toxicities. 14% of patients had grade 1-2 radiation necrosis (RN); there were no cases of grade 3+ RN.

CONCLUSION

Cobalt-60 frameless fractionated SRS for brain metastases offers excellent local control, rigorous sparing of critical structures, and minimal toxicity. Frameless fractionated SRS should be considered for large, retreated, or critically located metastases.

Radio-Immune Response of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy for VMAT Lattice Plans

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To evaluate radio-immune response of spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) for large tumors using VMAT Lattice technique in terms of tumor volume under irradiation and dose fractionation schemes after SFRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Eleven patients treated with SFRT from a single institution were retrospectively replanned to deliver 15Gy in single fraction using Lattice technique. High dose regions are defined by multiple spheres with the diameter of 1.25 to 1.5cm and their vertex space of 3.0 to 4.0cm inside of GTV. VMAT plans with multiple arcs were developed for SFRT. Four palliative fractionation regimens of 200cGy x 12 (EQD2 = 24Gy with a/b of 10Gy), 400cGy x 5 (23.3Gy), 600cGy x 3 (24Gy) and 800cGy x2 (24Gy) and four definitive regimens of 200cGy x 24 (EQD2 = 48Gy), 400cGy x 10 (46.7Gy), 600cGy x 6 (48Gy) and 800cGy x 4 (48Gy) were considered for radiotherapy to follow SFRT. Linear quadratic (LQ) model is compared with radio-immune (RI) response model in which the activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, tumor immune suppression capability and immunotherapy drugs can be considered. Tumor regrowth time (TRT, time to tumor regrowth to the original volume after treatment) from each model was compared as a measure of benefit achieved from the application of SFRT.

RESULTS

The average volume of GTVs in this study was 776cc (range 58-2944cc). Three different SFRT plans (2D GRID technique with conventional collimator, 2D GRID with step & shoot IMRT, and 3D Lattice) were developed for each patient but only Lattice plans were considered in this study since they produced comparable dose modulation inside the tumor but only Lattice significantly reduced skin and critical organ dose. Radio-immune response model always expects longer TRT than LQ model. For palliative regimens, TRT of RI model is longer than that of LQ model by 14.5±9.9, 15.1±10.6, 17.2±12.4, 17.5±12.8 days for each fractionation scheme. When Lattice plan of 15Gy is delivered before the palliative treatment, the difference becomes 25.9±15.3, 31.5±23.3, 36.7±27.6, 37.5±28.5 days. The benefit of SFRT from RI response is only about 10-20 days. Interestingly, RI response is inversely proportional to tumor volume. When curative dose is considered, the difference of TRT is drastically changed from 25.9±9.8, 460.7±285.8, 1180.8±985.7, 1512.0±1327.5 days to 20.7±4.4, 449.0±411.7, 1725.4±2171.0, 3517.7±4531.7 days. The benefit of SFRT from RI response appears larger for large tumor with hypo-fractionation in definitive regimens.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of SFRT is significant for large tumors with hypo fractionation in the definitive regimens when radio-immune response model is considered which is not apparent in LQ model. Radio-immune response model may help to guide the development of successful treatment scheme large tumor volumes.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Single- vs. Two-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Vertebral Metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

As systemic therapies improve significantly, more patients with limited metastatic disease are undergoing spine stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). High dose (≥24 Gy) single fraction sSRS has been associated with a vertebral compression fracture (VCF) risk of up to 40%. Comparatively, lower dose (16-18 Gy) single fraction sSRS is associated with a fracture risk of 15-20%, with the risk increasing as the dose increases. To mitigate the risk of VCF, while optimizing higher dose delivery, some have advocated utilizing two-fraction sSRS regimen. Therefore, we designed a phase II randomized trial in which we hypothesized that single fraction sSRS is non-inferior to two-fraction sSRS with respect to VCF but offers patients greater convenience.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Inclusion criteria include age ≥18, Karnofsky performance score ≥70, vertebral metastasis from C3 to L5, maximum of three separate sites of metastases, limited paraspinal extension (<5 cm), and no rapid neurological decline. Patients must also be either Recursive Partitioning Analysis Class 1 (KPS >70 AND controlled systemic disease) or Class 2 (KPS >70, uncontrolled systemic disease OR KPS ≤70, age ≥54, no visceral metastases). Exclusion criteria include multiple primary cancers, primary neoplasm of the spine, prior surgery at the site of sSRS, spinal cord compression, bony retropulsion resulting in neurologic deficit, inability to undergo/contraindication to MRI, or diffuse multi-level metastatic spine disease. Our primary hypothesis is that single fraction sSRS (experimental arm - 16-18 Gy) is non-inferior to two fraction sSRS (standard arm - 24 Gy). Furthermore, we hypothesize that both treatment arms will have similar local control, pain control, quality of life and toxicity profiles. The primary endpoint of this trial is the development or progression of VCF at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include local control, pain control, quality of life and toxicity all of which will be assessed at 12 months. For the sample size calculation, we assumed a VCF risk of 17% in the experimental arm and a 7% risk in the standard arm. Based on these calculations, we aim to enroll 130 patients, 65 in each arm. This trial is currently enrolling patients actively, and approximately 30% of expected enrollment has been completed to date. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04218617.

RESULTS

Pending full accrual.

CONCLUSION

Pending full accrual.

Single-fraction radiosurgery outcomes for large vestibular schwannomas in the upfront or post-surgical setting: a systematic review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of literature specific to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large vestibular schwannomas (VS), maximum diameter ≥ 2.5 cm and/or classified as Koos Grade IV, and to present consensus recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

METHODS

The Medline and Embase databases were used to apply the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach. We considered eligible prospective and retrospective studies, written in the English language, reporting treatment outcomes for large VS; SRS for large post-operative tumors were analyzed in aggregate and separately.

RESULTS

19 of the 229 studies initially identified met the final inclusion criteria. Overall crude rate of tumor control was 89% (93.7% with no prior surgery vs 87.7% with prior surgery). Rates of salvage microsurgical resection, need for shunt, and additional SRS in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 9.6% vs 3.3%, 4.7% vs 6.4% and 1% vs 0.9%, respectively. Rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 1.3% vs 3.4% and 34.2% vs 40.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront SRS resulted in high rates of tumor control with acceptable rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation as compared to the results in those series including patients with prior surgery (level C evidence). Therefore, although large VS are considered classic indication for microsurgical resection, upfront SRS can be considered in selected patients and we recommend a prescribed marginal dose from 11 to 13 Gy (level C evidence).

Radio-immune response modelling for spatially fractionated radiotherapy

Objective.Radiation-induced cell death is a complex process influenced by physical, chemical and biological phenomena. Although consensus on the nature and the mechanism of the bystander effect were not yet made, the immune process presumably plays an important role in many aspects of the radiotherapy including the bystander effect. A mathematical model of immune response during and after radiation therapy is presented.Approach.Immune response of host body and immune suppression of tumor cells are modelled with four compartments in this study; viable tumor cells, T cell lymphocytes, immune triggering cells, and doomed cells. The growth of tumor was analyzed in two distinctive modes of tumor status (immune limited and immune escape) and its bifurcation condition.Main results.Tumors in the immune limited mode can grow only up to a finite size, named as terminal tumor volume analytically calculated from the model. The dynamics of the tumor growth in the immune escape mode is much more complex than the tumors in the immune limited mode especially when the status of tumor is close to the bifurcation condition. Radiation can kill tumor cells not only by radiation damage but also by boosting immune reaction.Significance.The model demonstrated that the highly heterogeneous dose distribution in spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) can make a drastic difference in tumor cell killing compared to the homogeneous dose distribution. SFRT cannot only enhance but also moderate the cell killing depending on the immune response triggered by many factors such as dose prescription parameters, tumor volume at the time of treatment and tumor characteristics. The model was applied to the lifted data of 67NR tumors on mice and a sarcoma patient treated multiple times over 1200 days for the treatment of tumor recurrence as a demonstration.

18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study

PURPOSE

Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions.

METHODS

Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation.

RESULTS

Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.

Combination of EGFR-Directed Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) with Radiotherapy in Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 2010-2019 Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, brain metastases have been treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole-brain radiation (WBRT), and/or surgical resection. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), over half of which carry EGFR mutations, are the leading cause of brain metastases. EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown promise in NSCLC; but their utility in NSCLC brain metastases (NSCLCBM) remains unclear. This work sought to investigate whether combining EGFR-TKI with WBRT and/or SRS improves overall survival (OS) in NSCLCBM.

METHODS

A retrospective review of NSCLCBM patients diagnosed during 2010-2019 at a tertiary-care US center was performed and reported following the 'strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines. Data regarding socio-demographic and histopathological characteristics, molecular attributes, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes were collected. Concurrent therapy was defined as the combination of EGFR-TKI and radiotherapy given within 28 days of each other.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients with EGFR mutations were included. Of these, 32 patients had been treated with WBRT only, 51 patients received SRS only, 36 patients received SRS and WBRT only, 18 were given EGFR-TKI and SRS, and 29 were given EGFR-TKI and WBRT. Median OS for the WBRT-only group was 3.23 months, for SRS + WBRT it was 3.17 months, for EGFR-TKI + WBRT 15.50 months, for SRS only 21.73 months, and for EGFR-TKI + SRS 23.63 months. Multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly higher OS in the SRS-only group (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84, p = 0.017) compared to the WBRT reference group. There were no significant differences in overall survival for the SRS + WBRT combination cohort (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.60, 2.82, p = 0.50), EGFR-TKIs and WBRT combination cohort (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.41, 2.08, p = 0.85), or the EGFR-TKI + SRS cohort (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.20, 1.09, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLCBM patients treated with SRS had a significantly higher OS compared to patients treated with WBRT-only. While sample-size limitations and investigator-associated selection bias may limit the generalizability of these results, phase II/III clinicals trials are warranted to investigate synergistic efficacy of EGFR-TKI and SRS.

Radio-Immune Response Modelling for Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy

Radiation-induced cell death is a complex process influenced by physical, chemical and biological phenomena. Strong dose gradient may intensify the complexity and reportedly creates significantly more cell death known as bystander effect. Although consensus on the nature and the mechanism of the bystander effect were not yet made, the immune process presumably plays an important role in many aspects of the radiotherapy including the bystander effect. Immune response of host body and immune suppression of tumor cells are modelled with four compartments in this study; viable tumor cells, T cell lymphocytes, immune triggering cells, and doomed cells. The growth of tumor was analyzed in two distinctive modes of tumor status (immune limited and immune escape) and its bifurcation condition. Tumors in the immune limited mode can grow only up to a finite size, named as terminal tumor volume analytically calculated from the model. The dynamics of the tumor growth in the immune escape mode is much more complex than the tumors in the immune limited mode especially when the status of tumor is close to the bifurcation condition. Radiation can kill tumor cells not only by radiation damage but also by boosting immune reaction. The model demonstrated that the highly heterogeneous dose distribution in spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) can make a drastic difference in tumor cell killing compared to the homogeneous dose distribution. SFRT can not only enhance but also moderate the cell killing depending on the immune response triggered by many factors such as dose prescription parameters, tumor volume at the time of treatment and tumor characteristics. The model was applied to the lifted data of 67NR tumors on mice and a sarcoma patient treated multiple times over 1200 days for the treatment of tumor recurrence as a demonstration.

First- versus Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Introduction: Up to 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor EGFR alterations, the most common etiology behind brain metastases (BMs). First-generation EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) are limited by blood-brain barrier penetration and T790M tumor mutations, wherein third-generation EGFR-TKIs, like Osimertinib, have shown greater activity. However, their efficacy has not been well-studied in later therapy lines in NSCLC patients with BMs (NSCLC-BM). We sought to compare outcomes of NSCLC-BM treated with either first- or third-generation EGFR-TKIs in first-line and 2nd-to-5th-line settings. Methods: A retrospective review of NSCLC-BM patients diagnosed during 2010-2019 at Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, US, a quaternary-care center, was performed and reported following 'strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines. Data regarding socio-demographic, histopathological, molecular characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. Primary outcomes were median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score matching were utilized to adjust for confounders. Results: 239 NSCLC-BM patients with EGFR alterations were identified, of which 107 received EGFR-TKIs after diagnosis of BMs. 77.6% (83/107) received it as first-line treatment, and 30.8% (33/107) received it in later (2nd-5th) lines of therapy, with nine patients receiving it in both settings. 64 of 107 patients received first-generation (erlotinib/gefitinib) TKIs, with 53 receiving them in the first line setting and 13 receiving it in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. 50 patients received Osimertinib as third-generation EGFR-TKI, 30 in first-line, and 20 in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. Univariable analysis in first-line therapy demonstrated mOS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs as 18.2 and 19.4 months, respectively (p = 0.57), while unadjusted mPFS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs was 9.3 and 13.8 months, respectively (p = 0.14). In 2nd-5th line therapy, for first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, mOS was 17.3 and 11.9 months, (p = 0.19), while mPFS was 10.4 and 6.08 months, respectively (p = 0.41). After adjusting for age, performance status, presence of extracranial metastases, whole-brain radiotherapy, and presence of leptomeningeal metastases, hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.25 (95% CI 0.63-2.49, p = 0.52) for first-line therapy. Adjusted HR for mOS in 2nd-to-5th line therapy was 1.60 (95% CI 0.55-4.69, p = 0.39). Conclusions: No difference in survival was detected between first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in either first or 2nd-to-5th lines of therapy. Larger prospective studies are warranted reporting intracranial lesion size, EGFR alteration and expression levels in primary tumor and brain metastases, and response rates.

Abstract 3221: Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) treated with tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy: post-marketing safety data over the last decade

Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) face poor outcomes; the 5-year survival rate is 7% with standard of care treatments, which are frequently associated with systemic toxicity. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt critical cancer cell processes. The TTFields therapy device consists of a portable electric field generator and arrays placed on the patient’s scalp, thus delivery is locoregional and noninvasive. Currently, TTFields therapy is approved for recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM, based on the phase 3 EF-11 (TTFields 200 kHz) and EF-14 studies (TTFields therapy 200 kHz + temozolomide), respectively. These studies confirmed that TTFields therapy had a tolerable safety profile with mild-to-moderate localized skin adverse events (AEs) being the most common related AEs. Here, we present an updated analysis of the largest global real-world evidence dataset of patients with brain tumors receiving TTFields therapy over an 11-year time period. Unsolicited safety data were obtained from routine post-marketing activities, including published literature and interactions with patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Safety data were grouped according to age, diagnosis, and sex. AEs were categorized using MedDRA version 25. Data from 25,898 patients were included in this analysis; median age was 59 years (range: 3-103) for patients with known age. Diagnoses were ndGBM (67.7%), rGBM (26.1%), anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma (4.2%) and other (2.1%). Most (n=17,817, 68.8%) patients were 18-65 years of age; n=93 (0.4%) were pediatric/adolescent patients (&lt;18 years), and n=7,808 (30.2%) were elderly patients (&gt;65 years). For 130 patients (0.5%) age was not known. Two-thirds of patients were male, which reflects the preponderance of CNS tumors in males. Most patients were based in North America (72.1%), followed by Europe, the Middle East and Africa (23.3%), and Japan (4.6%). Overall, 72.4% of patients experienced at least one AE, with 55.9% being related to TTFields therapy. The most common AEs (overall and related to TTFields therapy) were skin reactions (42.0%), electric (tingling) sensations (13.5%), and heat (warmth) sensations (11.8%). The percentage of patients experiencing ≥1 AE in the pediatric/adolescent, 18-65, and elderly groups was 63.4%, 74.6%, and 68.4%, respectively. The percentage of females and males experiencing ≥1 AE was 75.2% and 70.9%, respectively. These long-term, real-world data from the largest global dataset of patients with brain tumors using TTFields therapy to date demonstrate a tolerable safety profile consistent with pivotal clinical studies. There were no new safety signals, and most AEs were manageable localized mild-moderate skin events that can be resolved. The distribution of AEs between age and sex was similar, with broad applicability among different patient groups.

Citation Format: Maciej M. Mrugala, Wenyin Shi, Fabio Iwamoto, Rimas V. Lukas, Joshua D. Palmer, John H. Suh, Martin Glas. Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) treated with tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy: post-marketing safety data over the last decade [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3221.

Development of a United States Radiation Oncology Curricular Framework: A Stakeholder Delphi Consensus

PURPOSE

A United States (US) radiation oncology curriculum, developed using best practices for curriculum inquiry, is needed to guide residency education and qualifying examinations. Competency-based training, including entrustable professional activities (EPAs), provides an outcomes-based approach to modern graduate medical education. This study aimed to define US radiation oncology EPAs and curricular content domains using a deliberative process with input from multiple stakeholder groups.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group Core Curriculum Project Leadership Committee developed initial content domains and EPAs. Following recruitment of stakeholders, a Delphi process was used to achieve consensus. In the first round, content domains and EPAs were reviewed for inclusion and exclusion, clarity, time allocation (content domains), and level of training (EPAs). Participants submitted additional content domains and EPAs for consideration. Any content domains or EPAs 1 standard deviation below the median for inclusion and exclusion underwent Leadership Committee review. All participants completing the first Delphi round were invited to the second round. Percent curriculum time allocated for content domains and a single subdomain were finalized. New EPAs or EPAs undergoing major revisions were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 186 participants representing diverse stakeholder groups participated. One hundred fourteen completed the first Delphi round (61.3%). Of 114 invited, 77 participants completed the second round of the Delphi process (67.5%). Overall, 6 of 9 content domains met consensus, 1 content domain was removed, and 2 content domains were combined. Four subdomains of a single content domain were reviewed and met consensus. Consensus on percent time allocated per content domain and subdomain was reached. Of 55 initial EPAs, 52 final EPAs met consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Deliberative curriculum inquiry was successfully used to develop a consensus on US radiation oncology content domains and EPAs. These data can guide the allocation of educational time in training programs, help inform weighting for qualifying examinations, and help guide clinical training and resident assessment.

Disparities in prostate cancer diagnoses in persons experiencing homelessness

24

Background: We previously reported that persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) are significantly less likely to undergo prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing compared to persons not experiencing homelessness (non-PEH). The purpose of this study was to determine if reduced PSA testing in PEH results in more advanced prostate cancer diagnoses. Methods: We identified PSA screening eligible PEH (men ages 50-69) from an institutional registry of all patients that presented to our healthcare system as homeless from 2014 to 2021. A matched cohort of non-PEH was generated for comparison. Institutional CPT and HCPCS billing codes for PSA testing were available beginning 01/01/2017 and cross-referenced to identify PEH and non-PEH who underwent PSA testing at least once between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2021. In patients with ≥ 1 PSA test, we recorded screening, oncologic and treatment related variables. Patients with a history of prostate cancer diagnosed outside the study timeframe were excluded. Results: A total of 9,249 PEH were identified, with 1,597 meeting PSA screening criteria during the study timeframe; 3,370 screening eligible non-PEH were available for comparison. The median age was 59.0 for PEH and 60.0 for non-PEH. PEH were significantly less likely to have a primary care provider (58% vs 81%, p<0.001) or to have a PSA test (12% vs 33%, p<0.001). Among patients with a PSA test, PEH were significantly less likely to have multiple PSA tests compared to non-PEH (28% vs 61%, p<0.001) and significantly more likely to have a PSA ≥ 4.0 (18% vs 12%, p=0.028). In patients with a PSA ≥ 4.0, PEH were less likely to receive a prostate biopsy (37% vs 61%, p =0.009) and there was a trend towards decreased prostate MRI (11% vs 25%, p=0.085). A total of 6 PEH (0.4%) and 46 non-PEH (1.4%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The median PSA at diagnosis was 12.6 in PEH vs 7.0 in non-PEH (p=0.052). PEH were significantly more likely to present with high/very high risk disease (4/6 [66%] vs 9/46 [20%], p=0.019); no PEH had very low/low risk disease compared with 20 (43.5%) non-PEH. PEH were more likely to present with lymph node positive or metastatic disease (3/6 [50%] vs 3/46 [7%], p=0.016). The median time from biopsy to treatment was 119 days in PEH and 76 days in non-PEH (p=0.391). Conclusions: PEH are less likely to receive prostate cancer testing following an elevated PSA and more likely to present with high risk advanced prostate cancer. Interventions to increase prostate cancer awareness in PEH are needed to reduce disparities.

Cancer Diagnoses and Use of Radiation Therapy Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness

PURPOSE

Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) have low rates of cancer screening and worse cancer mortality compared with persons not experiencing homelessness. Data regarding cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are limited. We investigated cancer prevalence and use of radiation therapy (RT) in PEH.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients presenting between January 1, 2014, and September 27, 2021, at a large metropolitan hospital system were assessed for homelessness via intake screening or chart search. PEH data were cross-referenced with the institution's cancer database to identify PEH with cancer diagnoses. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were abstracted.

RESULTS

Of a total of 9654 (9250 evaluable) PEH with a median age of 42 years, 81 patients (0.88%) had at least 1 cancer diagnosis and 5 had multiple diagnoses, for a total of 87 PEH with at least 1 cancer diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. In total, 43% were female and 51% were Black, and 43% presented with advanced or metastatic disease. Lung (17%), prostate (15%), leukemia/lymphoma (13%), and head/neck (9%) were the most common diagnoses. In total, 17% of patients underwent surgery alone, 13% received chemotherapy alone, 14% received RT alone, and 6% received hormone therapy alone. A total of 8% of patients underwent no treatment, and 43% underwent multimodality therapy. In total, 58% of treated patients never achieved disease-free status. Of the 31 patients who received RT, 87% received external beam RT. Most patients (70%) received hypofractionated regimens. For patients who had multifraction treatment, the treatment completion rate was 85%, significantly lower than the departmental completion rate of 98% (P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of PEH in a metropolitan setting, cancer diagnoses were uncommon and were frequently in advanced stages. Most patients underwent single-modality treatment or no treatment at all. Despite the use of hypofractionation, the RT completion rate was low, likely reflecting complex barriers to care. Further interventions to optimize cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are urgently needed.

Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis

PURPOSE

Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases.

METHODS

We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis.

RESULTS

Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.

A quantitative and comparative evaluation of stereotactic spine radiosurgery local control: proposing a consistent measurement methodology

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal treatment modality used in the management of metastatic spine tumors. Multiple studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy for pain and tumor control. However, no uniform quantitative imaging methodology exists to evaluate response to treatment in these patients. This study presents radiographic local control rates post-SBRT, systematically compares measurements acquired according to WHO and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and explores the relationship to patient outcome.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively obtained data from a cohort of 59 consecutive patients (81 metastatic isocenters) treated with SBRT and followed with serial MRI scans. Measurements were performed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the patients’ clinical course. Local control status was determined according to both WHO and RECIST measurements, and agreement between the measuring methodologies was calculated and reported.

RESULTS

Eighty-one isocenters (111 vertebral bodies) were treated with SBRT. The mean treatment dose was 13.96 Gy and the median follow-up duration was 10.8 months, during which 408 MRI scans were evaluated with both WHO and RECIST criteria for each scan point. Imaging demonstrated a mean unidimensional size decrease of 0.2 cm (p = 0.14) and a mean area size decrease of 0.99 cm2 (p = 0.03). Although 88% of the case classifications were concordant and the agreement was significant, WHO criteria were found to be more sensitive to tumor size change. The local control rates according to WHO and RECIST were 95% and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although WHO volumetric measurements are admittedly superior for tumor size measurement, RECIST is simpler, reproducible, and for the first time is shown here to be comparable to WHO criteria. Thus, the application of RECIST methodology appears to be a suitable standard for evaluating post-SBRT treatment response. Moreover, using comprehensive and consistent measuring approaches, this study substantiates the efficacy of SBRT in the treatment of spine metastases.

Prostate Cancer Screening Disparities in Persons Experiencing Homelessness

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in persons experiencing homelessness (PEH), identify factors associated with screening, and compare PSA screening rates in PEH with a matched cohort of persons not experiencing homelessness (non-PEH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 9,249 potentially eligible PEH cared for at a large metropolitan hospital system from an institutional registry of all patients who presented to the health care system as homeless from 2014 to 2021. Homelessness was defined by the presence of the Z-code for homelessness (Z59), the listed address matching to the address of a homeless shelter or other transitional housing or a positive screen for homelessness. A matched cohort of 10,000 non-PEH was generated for comparison. Univariate chi-square analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to evaluate variables associated with PSA testing.

RESULTS

A total of 1,605 PEH and 3,413 non-PEH were eligible for PSA screening within the study timeframe. Half of PEH were Black (50%). Medicaid was the most common insurance (51%), followed by Medicare (18%). PEH were less likely to have a PCP (58% v 81%, P < .001) and had a significantly lower PSA testing rate (13% v 34%, P < .001) compared with non-PEH. Univariate analysis revealed that PSA testing was more common in PEH who were employed (P < .001), had private insurance or Medicare (P < .001), or had an established primary care provider (PCP; P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that having a PCP (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.62 to 4.00; P < .001) significantly increased the likelihood of PSA testing in PEH.

CONCLUSION

PEH experience low rates of prostate cancer screening. Interventions to increase screening in this population, including increased PCP access, are needed.

P15.11.A 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study

Background

Amino acid PET radiopharmaceutical, 18F-fluciclovine, shows increased uptake in brain tumors relative to normal tissue and may be a useful tool for detecting recurrent brain metastases. Here, we report results from a prospective pilot study evaluating the use of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression among patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Material and Methods

The primary objective was to estimate the accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression. The trial included adults with brain metastases who underwent SRS and presented with a follow up MRI brain (with DSC MR perfusion) which was equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumour progression. Within 30 days of equivocal MRI brain, patients underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT (Siemens mCT) acquired 5-15 min post-injection with images generated by PSF reconstruction. Quantitative metrics for each lesion were documented and lesion to normal brain SUVmean ratios were calculated. The reference standard for diagnosis of radiation necrosis vs tumour progression was clinical follow up with MRI brain every 2-4 months until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation.

Results

Of 16 patients enrolled between 7/2019-11/2020, 1 patient died prior to diagnosis, allowing 15 evaluable subjects with 20 lesions. Primary histology was NSCLC in 9 (45%) lesions, breast in 7 (35%), melanoma in 3 (15%), and endometrial in 1 (5%). The final diagnosis was radiation necrosis in 16 (80%) lesions and tumour progression in 4 (20%). SUVmax was a statistically significant predictor of tumour progression (P = 0.011), with higher SUVmax values indicative of tumour progression. The area under the ROC curve was 0.833 (95% CI: 0.590, 1.0). A cutoff of 4.3 provided a sensitivity to identify tumour progression of 1.0 (4/4) and specificity to rule out tumour progression of 0.63 (10/16). SUVmean (P = 0.018), SUVpeak (P = 0.007), and SUVpeak/normal (P = 0.002) also reached statistical significance as predictors of tumour progression, with higher SUVmax values indicative of tumour progression. SUVmax/normal (P = 0.1) and SUVmean/normal (P = 0.5) were not statistically significant. The AUC for SUVmax was not significantly higher than the AUCs for the other quantitative variables (P-values &gt; 0.2).

Conclusion

In this prospective pilot study, 18F Fluciclovine PET/CT demonstrated promising accuracy to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with SRS. Using SUVmax, a cutpoint of 4.3 provided a sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 0.63. Confirmatory phase II and III studies are ongoing.

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides updated evidence-based recommendations addressing recent developments in the management of patients with brain metastases, including advanced radiation therapy techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy and the emergence of systemic therapies with central nervous system activity.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the radiotherapeutic management of intact and resected brain metastases from nonhematologic solid tumors. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Strong recommendations are made for SRS for patients with limited brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Multidisciplinary discussion with neurosurgery is conditionally recommended to consider surgical resection for all tumors causing mass effect and/or that are greater than 4 cm. For patients with symptomatic brain metastases, upfront local therapy is strongly recommended. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases eligible for central nervous system-active systemic therapy, multidisciplinary and patient-centered decision-making to determine whether local therapy may be safely deferred is conditionally recommended. For patients with resected brain metastases, SRS is strongly recommended to improve local control. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases receiving whole brain radiation therapy, hippocampal avoidance and memantine are strongly recommended. For patients with poor prognosis, early introduction of palliative care for symptom management and caregiver support are strongly recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of radiation therapy for brain metastases with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) are often treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to achieve complete obliteration (CO), prevent future hemorrhages, and ameliorate neurological symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize outcomes after SRS for dAVFs and propose relevant practice recommendations.

METHODS

Using a PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE protocol, we included patients with dAVFs treated with SRS and data for at least one of the outcomes of the study. Relevant outcomes were CO, symptom improvement and cure, and post-SRS hemorrhage or permanent neurological deficits (PNDs). Estimated outcome effect sizes were determined using weighted random-effects meta-analyses using DerSimonian and Laird methods. To assess potential relationships between patient and lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes, mixed-effects weighted regression models were used.

RESULTS

Across 21 published studies, we identified 705 patients with 721 dAVFs treated with SRS. The CO rate was 68.6% (95% CI 60.7%-76.5%) with symptom improvement and cure rates of 97.2% (95% CI 93.2%-100%) and 78.8% (95% CI 69.3%-88.2%), respectively. Estimated incidences of post-SRS hemorrhage and PNDs were 1.1% (95% CI 0.6%-1.6%) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.8%-1.8%), respectively. Noncavernous sinus (NCS) dAVFs were associated with lower CO (P = .03) and symptom cure rates (P = .001). Higher grade was also associated with lower symptom cure rates (P = .04), whereas previous embolization was associated with higher symptom cure rates (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

SRS for dAVFs results in CO in the majority of patients with excellent symptom improvement rates with minimal toxicity. Patients with NCS and/or higher-grade dAVFs have poorer symptom cure rates. Combined therapy with embolization and SRS is recommended when feasible for clinically aggressive dAVFs or those refractory to embolization to maximize the likelihood of symptom cure.

Sex-Specific Differences in Low Grade Glioma Presentation and Outcome

PURPOSE

In addition to established prognostic factors in low-grade glioma (LGG), studies suggest a sexual dimorphism with male sex portending worse prognosis. Our objective was to identify the impact of sex on presentation and outcomes in LGG.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with LGG (WHO 2016 grade 2 glioma). Patients with IDH wildtype tumors were excluded. Patients were matched between male and female sex by age, treatment, and surgery via propensity score matching. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed by sex. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), next intervention free survival (NIFS), progression free survival (PFS), and malignant transformation free survival (MTFS). Kaplan Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable analysis (MVA) with backwards elimination was completed.

RESULTS

Of the 532 patients identified, 258 (48%) were male. Males were more likely to present with seizure (69.38% vs. 56.57%, p = 0.002), but no other statistically significant differences between sexes at presentation were identified. 5-year OS was higher in females at 87% (95% CI 83%-91%) versus 78% (95% CI 73-84%) in males (p=0.0045). NIFS was significantly higher in female patients at 68% (95% CI 62-74%) versus 57% (95% CI 51%-64%) in males (p = 0.009). On MVA, female sex was independently associated with improved OS (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.05; p= 0.002), NIFS (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.42; p= 0.004), and MTFS (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24-2.12; p= 0.0004). In patients with molecularly defined LGG (IDH and 1p19q status) (n = 291), female sex remained independently associated with improved OS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.16-2.77; p = 0.008) and NIFS (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07-1.96; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, female sex was independently associated with improved outcomes. These findings support intrinsic sex-specific differences in LGG behavior, justifying further studies to optimize management and therapeutics based on sex.

Bevacizumab for radiation necrosis of the brain or steroid-refractory edema in patients with melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

e14008

Background: For patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 5-6.5% develop radiation necrosis of the brain (RNB), which is commonly treated with corticosteroids (CS). Nonetheless, high-dose CS may reduce efficacy of immunotherapy (IO). Bevacizumab (BV) has been shown to reduce symptoms and peritumoral edema associated with RNB. However, data on the efficacy and toxicity of BV in patients with MBM who also receive IO is limited. We aimed to describe clinical features and outcomes of patients with MBM who received BV and were also treated with IO. Methods: Under an IRB-approved protocol, patients with MBM who developed RNB or steroid-refractory edema (SRE) and were treated with BV were identified. The selection criteria were as follows: (1) one or more MBM; (2) prior SRS for MBM; (3) development of RNB or SRE detected radiographically or based on expert opinion; (4) treatment with one or more cycles of BV; (5) treatment with IO for metastatic melanoma. Results: In this single-center retrospective series, 8 patients received IO and BV: 4 concurrently and 4 patients received IO immediately prior to or after BV. IO therapy included ipilimumab-nivolumab, nivolumab alone or pembrolizumab. Median number of MBM was 3.6 (range, 1-8) and median number of RNB/SRE foci were 1.125 (range, 1-2). Median time from diagnosis of RNB/SRE to initiation of BV was 1.4 months (range, 0.5-3 months). BV dosing regimen was 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. 71% (5 of 7) patients who required CS for RNB/peritumoral edema symptoms at the time of starting BV were able to taper CS after receiving BV or stop CS completely. This allowed for 4 of these patients to subsequently start or resume IO. 28% (2 of 7) patients had increasing neurological symptoms during CS taper and required an increase in CS dosing. Only 1 patient was not on CS at the time of BV initiation. 75% (6 of 8) cases attained intracranial radiologic response, with documented decreased edema or tumor size, or resolution of enhancement on MRI; 1 patient had stable disease after BV; and 1 patient had continued clinical deterioration despite BV. 62.5% (5 of 8) patients had no adverse events from BV, but 37.5% (3 of 8) had DVT/PE, 1 requiring a thrombectomy, and 1 additionally had perforated diverticulitis. Median follow-up time from BV administration was 17.94 months (range, 1-58 months), with 75% (6 of 8) patients with survival > 10 months. Conclusions: Treatment of RNB/SRE with BV in patients with MBM receiving IO appears to be effective and relatively well tolerated, though with occasional serious adverse events. BV led to improvement of symptoms and allowed for CS taper in a substantial proportion of patients. By reducing CS requirement, BV may permit continuation of IO, which leads to durable survival in a large proportion of patients.

Breast cancer screening in persons experiencing homelessness

6515

Background: Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) suffer from poor health outcomes, including worse cancer mortality, compared to persons not experiencing homelessness. A portion of the disparity in cancer outcomes is attributable to reduced access to cancer screening, leading to more advanced-stage disease and a higher risk of death compared to the general population. Data regarding cancer screening rates in PEH are scarce. We therefore sought to evaluate baseline rates of breast cancer screening in PEH. Methods: All patients presenting for care from January 1, 2014 onward at a hospital system spanning five counties in a populous Midwestern state were screened for homelessness. Homelessness was identified by two criteria: presence of the Z-code for homelessness (Z59) in the patient’s electronic medical record, and/or patient’s address on record listed as an address matching that of a regional homeless shelter, transitional housing, or “homeless.” Identified PEH were maintained in a prospective registry. For each female PEH in the screening age range, billing data for completed breast cancer screening mammography performed in the previous five years (1/1/17-12/31/21) were extracted (CPT codes 77063, 77067). Data were also extracted for a cohort of non-PEH patients eligible for screening. Demographic and clinical data were extracted for all patients. This study was approved by the hospital system’s IRB. Results: A total of 3,474 female (biological sex) PEH were identified, with 1,320 eligible for screening mammography (alive and between the ages of 40 and 79) in the study timeframe. The median age was 53.5 years old; 44% were Black, 48% White, 8.5% unknown/other race, and 3% Hispanic ethnicity. 28% of PEH were uninsured, and 67% had government insurance; 66% had an assigned primary care physician (PCP). Of PEH eligible for screening mammography, 237 (18%) had at least one screening mammogram during this five-year interval (2017, 2.2%; 2018, 4.3%; 2019, 3.6%; 2020, 3.7%; 2021, 4.3%). In a cohort of 6,240 non-PEH eligible for screening over the same timeframe, the screening mammography rate was 32%, which was significantly higher than the screening rate for PEH (p < 0.00001). Compared to PEH who did not undergo screening mammography, PEH who underwent screening mammography were more likely to have an assigned PCP (90% vs 38%, p < 0.00001), to be a non-current tobacco user (56% vs 35%, p < 0.00001), and to be a non-current illicit drug user (84 % vs 68%, p = 0.0015). PEH who underwent screening mammography were significantly less likely to be uninsured (12% vs 31%, p < 0.00001). Conclusions: In the largest study of its kind to date, we identified low rates of breast cancer screening in female PEH. Interventions to increase breast cancer screening in this vulnerable population are urgently needed and may include increased access to PCPs, tobacco and drug cessation programs, and provision of health insurance.

Using a daily monitoring system to reduce treatment position override rates in external beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To report our 7-year experience with a daily monitoring system to significantly reduce couch position overrides and errors in patient treatment positioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment couch position override data were extracted from a radiation oncology-specific electronic medical record system from 2012 to 2018. During this period, we took several actions to reduce couch position overrides, including reducing the number of tolerance tables from 18 to 6, tightening tolerance limits, enforcing time outs, documenting reasons for overrides, and timely reviewing of overrides made from previous treatment day. The tolerance tables included treatment categories for head and neck (HN) (with/without cone beam CT [CBCT]), body (with/without CBCT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and clinical setup for electron beams. For the same time period, we also reported treatment positioning-related incidents that were recorded in our departmental incident report system. To verify our tolerance limits, we further examined couch shifts after daily kilovoltage CBCT (kV-CBCT) for the patients treated from 2018 to 2021.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2018, the override rate decreased from 11.2% to 1.6%/year, whereas the number of fractions treated in the department increased by 23%. The annual patient positioning error rate was also reduced from 0.019% in 2012, to 0.004% in 2017 and 0% in 2018. For patients treated under daily kV-CBCT guidance from 2018 to 2021, the applied couch shifts after imaging registration that exceeded the tolerance limits were low, <1% for HN, <1.2% for body, and <2.6% for SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The daily monitoring system, which enables a timely review of overrides, significantly reduced the number of treatment couch position overrides and ultimately resulted in a decrease in treatment positioning errors. For patients treated with daily kV-CBCT guidance, couch position shifts after CBCT image guidance demonstrated a low rate of exceeding the set tolerance.

The ABR 2021 Radiation Oncology Remote Examinations: Development, Administration, and Implications for the Future

With the onset of the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in early 2020, it became apparent that routine administration of the ABR Qualifying and Certifying Exams would be disrupted. Initial intent for postponement was later altered to a recognition that replacement of the existing delivery methodologies was essential. Herein, the authors describe the conceptualization, development, administration, and future implications of the new remote examination delivery platforms.

A new conformity and dose gradient distance measure for stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastasis

Purpose

Competing radiosurgery plans are compared based on their conformity and gradient of dose distribution to the target volume (TV). Most widely used quality metrics such as new conformity index (NCI) and gradient index (GI) are known to have strong volume dependency on the TV of interest. A simple quality measure without the volume dependency is presented for evaluating stereotactic radiosurgery plans, expressed in distance dimension compared to the unit-less volume ratio used in NCI and GI.

Methods and Materials

The conformity distance measure (CDM) is defined as the effective radius of the union volume subtracted by that of the intersection volume, where volume operations are on TV and prescription isodose volume (PIV). Gradient distance measure (GDM) is defined as the effective radius of 50% PIV (low dose volume of the plan) subtracted by that of corresponding ideal low dose volume (iLDV). Volume independency and consistent sensitivity of CDM and GDM on PIV displacement and dose spillage are analyzed using a simple two-sphere model. 2429 cases of Gamma Knife and 76 cases of Linac based radiosurgery plans for brain metastasis were retrospectively studied to demonstrate volume independency of the new measures and their implication on target coverage.

Results

The sensitivity of NCI on PIV displacement and dose spillage was inversely proportional to the effective radius of the target volume, while the sensitivity of CDM on target motion and dose spillage was constant regardless the target volume. The iLDV for 50% PIV was approximately 2.4 times of PIV based on previous Linac based radiosurgery/IMRT/VMAT plans and single shot analysis from Gamma Knife (GK), ICON. Although NCI ranged from 1 to 14.7 for GK plans and from 1.2 to 20.8 for VMAT plans showing strong volume dependency, CDM showed negligible volume dependency of less than 2.1 mm for more than 90% cases and peak frequency was at 0.8 mm. CDM was correlated well with target coverage as a function of PIV displacement regardless of target volume. Target coverage, V100, was larger than 95% when PIV displacement is less than CDM.

Conclusions

The new conformity and gradient measure, CDM and GDM are proposed in this paper. The new measures are volume independent which is preferred for reliable evaluation of the radiosurgery plan quality over wide range of radiosurgery targets. As represented by distance dimension similar to PTV margin, the new measures may be more adequate for image guided radiosurgery applications.

Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model and Large Urban Academic Centers: Future Implications for Patients and Providers

The radiation oncology alternative payment model (RO-APM) was developed by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, a part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, as a vehicle to optimize value for patients undergoing radiation therapy. By shifting reimbursement away from fee-for-service and toward a prospective bundled payment system, the RO-APM is intended to bend the cost curve in radiation oncology while preserving or even enhancing outcomes. As with prior large-scale policy initiatives, the nature and magnitude of the RO-APM's impact on care delivery will vary substantially depending on a host of local factors, including practice setting. Urban academic centers play a key role in radiation oncology by spearheading innovation, managing the most complicated cases, training the next generation of radiation oncologists, and often caring for vulnerable patient populations. Thus, to protect patients' access to this high-quality cancer care, it will be crucial to characterize the RO-APM's projected impact on large urban academic institutions before its implementation, including possible unintended adverse consequences. Here, we provide an overview of this seismic change in radiation oncology reimbursement and discuss its unique potential implications for large urban academic institutions as a means to facilitate necessary preparations and inform future revisions to the model.

American brachytherapy society radiation oncology alternative payment model task force: Quality measures and metrics for brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy is an essential technique to deliver radiation therapy and is involved in the treatment of multiple disease sites as monotherapy or as an adjunct to external beam radiation therapy. With a growing focus on the cost and value of cancer treatments as well new payment models, it is essential that standardized quality measures and metrics exist to allow for straightforward assessment of brachytherapy quality and for the development of clinically significant and relevant clinical data elements. We present the American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement on quality measures and metrics for brachytherapy as well as suggested clinical data elements.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in disease site specific brachytherapy created a consensus statement based on a literature review and clinical experience.

RESULTS

Key quality measures (ex. workup, clinical indications), dosimetric metrics, and clinical data elements for brachytherapy were evaluated for each modality including breast cancer, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, keratinocyte carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and uveal melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus statement provides standardized quality measures and dosimetric quality metrics as well as clinical data elements for each disease site to allow for standardized assessments of brachytherapy quality. Moving forward, a similar paradigm can be considered for external beam radiation therapy as well, providing comprehensive radiation therapy quality measures, metrics, and clinical data elements that can be incorporated into new payment models.

Adjuvant radiation versus observation with salvage radiation after gross-total resection of WHO grade II meningiomas: a propensity score-adjusted analysis

OBJECTIVE

After gross-total resection (GTR) of a newly diagnosed WHO grade II meningioma, the decision to treat with radiation upfront or at initial recurrence remains controversial. A comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between observation and adjuvant radiation fails to account for the potential success of salvage radiation, and a direct comparison of PFS between adjuvant and salvage radiation is hampered by strong selection bias against salvage radiation cohorts in which only more aggressive, recurrent tumors are included. To account for the limitations of traditional PFS measures, the authors evaluated radiation failure-free survival (RFFS) between two treatment strategies after GTR: adjuvant radiation versus observation with salvage radiation, if necessary.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent GTR of newly diagnosed WHO grade II meningiomas at their institution between 1996 and 2019. They assessed traditional PFS in patients who underwent adjuvant radiation, postoperative observation, and salvage radiation. For RFFS, treatment failure was defined as time from initial surgery to failure of first radiation. To assess the association between treatment strategy and RFFS while accounting for potential confounders, a multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for the propensity score (PS) and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients underwent GTR and were included in this study. Of the 121 patients who underwent observation, 32 (26.4%) developed recurrence and required salvage radiation. PFS at 3, 5, and 10 years after observation was 75.1%, 65.6%, and 45.5%, respectively. PFS at 3 and 5 years after salvage radiation was 81.7% and 61.3%, respectively. Of 160 patients, 39 received adjuvant radiation, and 3- and 5-year PFS/RFFS rates were 86.1% and 59.2%, respectively. In patients who underwent observation with salvage radiation, if necessary, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFFS rates were 97.7%, 90.3%, and 87.9%, respectively. Both PS and IPTW Cox regression models demonstrated that patients who underwent observation with salvage radiation treatment, if necessary, had significantly longer RFFS (PS model: hazard ratio [HR] 0.21, p < 0.01; IPTW model: HR 0.21, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective, nonrandomized study, adjuvant radiation after GTR of a WHO II meningioma did not add significant benefit over a strategy of observation and salvage radiation at initial recurrence, if necessary, but results must be considered in the context of the limitations of the study design.