1
|
Telera S, Tosatto L, Colasanti R, Pace A, Villani V, Rasile F, Lecce M, Crispo F, Marucci L, Farneti A, Carosi M, Novello M, Giordano FR, Sperduti I, Gazzeri R. The role of surgery in recurrent local cerebral metastases: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:826. [PMID: 39467853 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03063-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local recurrent brain metastases are defined as lesions that recur in the brain at the same site after a previous local therapy. In patients already submitted to surgery, a second operation may be potentially challenging due to scar formation, infiltration of cerebral vessels or eloquent brain areas and local effect of previous radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to retrospectively review the results and complications of a second surgical treatment in a series of local recurrent lesions and to review the literature on this topic. METHODS 37 patients submitted to surgery for a local, histologically confirmed, recurrent brain metastases between 2000 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the following parameters: age, histology, anatomic location, time to recurrence, previous radiotherapy, size of recurrent tumors, preoperative and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class and graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score, surgery-related complications and the presence of further cerebral metastases. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression (forwards selection) with predictive variables that were significant in the univariate analyses. RESULTS A significant improvement of post-operative KPS status was obtained after second surgery. At multivariate analysis better results in terms of OS were achieved in patients with a pre-operative KPS ≥ 70 and in patients who had received radiotherapy after the initial surgery. No significant postoperative complications related to previous treatments were observed. CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection of local recurrent brain metastases may improve patients ́ neurologic conditions allowing more time for systemic therapies to act with a low incidence of surgery-related morbidity and mortality. However, careful patient selection with a fair pre-operative clinical status seems mandatory to achieve the best post-operative results, since uniform treatment-paradigms cannot be established yet, due to the highly heterogeneous patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Telera
- UOSD Neurosurgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | - Andrea Pace
- UOSD Neuro-Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Veronica Villani
- UOSD Neuro-Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Rasile
- UOSD Neurosurgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Lecce
- UOSD Neurosurgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Crispo
- UOSD Neurosurgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Marucci
- UOC Radiotherapy, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Farneti
- UOC Radiotherapy, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Mariantonia Carosi
- UOC Pathology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Novello
- UOC Pathology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Isabella Sperduti
- UOC Biostatistics, IRCCS National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Gazzeri
- UOC Pain Therapy, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goldberg M, Heinrich V, Altawalbeh G, Negwer C, Wagner A, Gempt J, Meyer B, Aftahy AK. The Role of Repeated Surgical Resections for Recurrent Brain Metastases in Older Population. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1464. [PMID: 39336505 PMCID: PMC11434355 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60091464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Revised: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The impact of surgery for recurrent brain metastases in elderly patients has been the object of debate due to limited information in the literature. We analyzed clinical outcome and survival of elderly patients with recurrent brain metastases in order to assess potentially beneficial role of surgery. Materials and methods: In total, 219 patients with recurrent brain metastases between 2007 and 2022 were identified, of which 95 underwent re-resection; 83 patients aged 65 and older were analyzed. A survival analysis was performed, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: The median survival time after surgery for recurrent brain metastases was 6 months (95CI 4-10) in older patients and 8 (95CI 7-9) in younger patients (p = 0.619). Out of all the older patients, 33 who underwent surgical resection showed prolonged survival compared with patients who did not receive surgical resection (median: 14, 95CI 8-19 vs. 4, 95CI 4-7, p = 0.011). All patients had preoperative Karnofsky performance scores of >70, which did not deteriorate after surgery (87.02 ± 5.76 vs. 85 ± 6.85; p = 0.055). In the univariate analysis, complete cytoreduction was a favorable prognostic factor. The tumor volume, the number of metastases, extracranial disease progression, adjuvant radiation, and systemic therapy did not affect survival in this cohort. Conclusions: Patients aged 65 and older benefit from neurosurgical resections of recurrent brain metastases. Survival did not differ from that in younger patients, which can be explained by a better preoperative functional status. Moreover, independent of the extent of resection, older patients who underwent surgery showed better survival than patients who did not receive surgical treatment. Complete cytoreduction was a favorable prognostic marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Goldberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Valeri Heinrich
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Ghaith Altawalbeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Chiara Negwer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Amir Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin J, Kaiser Y, Wiestler B, Bernhardt D, Combs SE, Delbridge C, Meyer B, Gempt J, Aftahy AK. Cytoreduction of Residual Tumor Burden Is Decisive for Prolonged Survival in Patients with Recurrent Brain Metastases-Retrospective Analysis of 219 Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5067. [PMID: 37894435 PMCID: PMC10605169 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in treatment for brain metastases (BMs), the prognosis for recurrent BMs remains poor and requires further research to advance clinical management and improve patient outcomes. In particular, data addressing the impact of tumor volume and surgical resection with regard to survival remain scarce. METHODS Adult patients with recurrent BMs between December 2007 and December 2022 were analyzed. A distinction was made between operated and non-operated patients, and the residual tumor burden (RTB) was determined by using (postoperative) MRI. Survival analysis was performed and RTB cutoff values were calculated using maximally selected log-rank statistics. In addition, further analyses on systemic tumor progression and (postoperative) tumor therapy were conducted. RESULTS In total, 219 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 60 years (IQR 52-69). Median preoperative tumor burden was 2.4 cm3 (IQR 0.8-8.3), and postoperative tumor burden was 0.5 cm3 (IQR 0.0-2.9). A total of 95 patients (43.4%) underwent surgery, and complete cytoreduction was achieved in 55 (25.1%) patients. Median overall survival was 6 months (IQR 2-10). Cutoff RTB in all patients was 0.12 cm3, showing a significant difference (p = 0.00029) in overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed preoperative KPSS (HR 0.983, 95% CI, 0.967-0.997, p = 0.015), postoperative tumor burden (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.008-1.053, p = 0.007), and complete vs. incomplete resection (HR 0.629, 95% CI 0.420-0.941, p = 0.024) as significant. Longer survival was significantly associated with surgery for recurrent BMs (p = 0.00097), and additional analysis demonstrated the significant effect of complete resection on survival (p = 0.0027). In the subgroup of patients with systemic progression, a cutoff RTB of 0.97 cm3 (p = 0.00068) was found; patients who had received surgery also showed prolonged OS (p = 0.036). Single systemic therapy (p = 0.048) and the combination of radiotherapy and systemic therapy had a significant influence on survival (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS RTB is a strong prognostic factor for survival in patients with recurrent BMs. Operated patients with recurrent BMs showed longer survival independent of systemic progression. Maximal cytoreduction should be targeted to achieve better long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Yannik Kaiser
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS) Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Claire Delbridge
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amir Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diehl CD, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Ille S, Kahl KH, Onken J, Rieken S, Sarria GR, Shiban E, Wagner A, Beck J, Brehmer S, Ganslandt O, Hamed M, Meyer B, Münter M, Raabe A, Rohde V, Schaller K, Schilling D, Schneider M, Sperk E, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Vatter H, Combs SE. Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3670. [PMID: 37509330 PMCID: PMC10377800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Niedersachsen (CCC-N), 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Ganslandt
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karl Schaller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Geneva Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Mannheim Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tewarie IA, Hulsbergen AFC, Jessurun CAC, Rendon LF, Mekary RA, Smith TR, Broekman MLD. Risk Factors of Second Local Recurrence in Surgically Treated Recurrent Brain Metastases: An Exploratory Analysis. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:e639-e647. [PMID: 36028114 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A first local recurrence is common after resection or radiotherapy for brain metastasis (BM). However, patients with BMs can develop multiple local recurrences over time. Published data on second local recurrences are scarce. This study aimed to report predictors associated with a second local recurrence in patients with BMs who underwent a craniotomy for a first locally recurrent BM. METHODS Patients were identified from a database at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for predictors of a second local recurrence were computed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Of 170 identified surgically treated first locally recurrent lesions, 74 (43.5%) progressed to second locally recurrent lesions at a median of 7 months after craniotomy. Subtotal resection of the first local BM recurrence was significantly associated with shorter time to second local recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.45). Infratentorial location was associated with a worse second local recurrence prognosis (hazard ratio = 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.96). CONCLUSIONS A second local recurrence occurred after 43.5% of craniotomies for first recurrent lesions. Subtotal resection and infratentorial location were the strongest risk factors for worse second local recurrence prognosis following resection of first recurrent BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander F C Hulsbergen
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Charissa A C Jessurun
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Luis F Rendon
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rania A Mekary
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hulsbergen AFC, Lo YT, Awakimjan I, Kavouridis VK, Phillips JG, Smith TR, Verhoeff JJC, Yu KH, Broekman MLD, Arnaout O. Survival Prediction After Neurosurgical Resection of Brain Metastases: A Machine Learning Approach. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:381-388. [PMID: 35608378 PMCID: PMC10553019 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current prognostic models for brain metastases (BMs) have been constructed and validated almost entirely with data from patients receiving up-front radiotherapy, leaving uncertainty about surgical patients. OBJECTIVE To build and validate a model predicting 6-month survival after BM resection using different machine learning algorithms. METHODS An institutional database of 1062 patients who underwent resection for BM was split into an 80:20 training and testing set. Seven different machine learning algorithms were trained and assessed for performance; an established prognostic model for patients with BM undergoing radiotherapy, the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment, was also evaluated. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and calibration. RESULTS The logistic regression showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.71 in the hold-out test set, a calibration slope of 0.76, and a calibration intercept of 0.03. The diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment had an AUC of 0.66. Patients were stratified into regular-risk, high-risk and very high-risk groups for death at 6 months; these strata strongly predicted both 6-month and longitudinal overall survival ( P < .0005). The model was implemented into a web application that can be accessed through http://brainmets.morethanml.com . CONCLUSION We developed and internally validated a prediction model that accurately predicts 6-month survival after neurosurgical resection for BM and allows for meaningful risk stratification. Future efforts should focus on external validation of our model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F. C. Hulsbergen
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Tung Lo
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ilia Awakimjan
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Vasileios K. Kavouridis
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - John G. Phillips
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Radiation Oncology, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Timothy R. Smith
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Joost J. C. Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kun-Hsing Yu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Marike L. D. Broekman
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Omar Arnaout
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ene CI, Ferguson SD. Surgical Management of Brain Metastasis: Challenges and Nuances. Front Oncol 2022; 12:847110. [PMID: 35359380 PMCID: PMC8963990 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.847110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis is the most common type of intracranial tumor. The contemporary management of brain metastasis is a challenging issue and traditionally has carried a poor prognosis as these lesions typically occur in the setting of advanced cancer. However, improvement in systemic therapy, advances in radiation techniques and multimodal therapy tailored to the individual patient, has given hope to this patient population. Surgical resection has a well-established role in the management of brain metastasis. Here we discuss the evolving role of surgery in the treatment of this diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heßler N, Jünger ST, Meissner AK, Kocher M, Goldbrunner R, Grau S. Recurrent brain metastases: the role of resection of in a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment setting. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:275. [PMID: 35291972 PMCID: PMC8922794 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment decision for recurrent symptomatic brain metastases (BM) is challenging with scarce data regarding surgical resection. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of surgery for pretreated, recurrent BM in a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment setting. Methods In a retrospective single center study, patients were analyzed, who underwent surgical resection of recurrent BM between 2007 and 2019. Intracranial event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Maier and Cox regression analysis. Results We included 107 patients with different primary tumor entities and individual previous treatment for BM. Primary tumors comprised non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (37.4%), breast cancer (19.6%), melanoma (13.1%), gastro-intestinal cancer (10.3%) and other, rare entities (19.6%). The number of previous treatments of BM ranged from one to four; the adjuvant treatment modalities comprised: none, focal or whole brain radiotherapy, brachytherapy and radiosurgery. The median pre-operative Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 70% (range 40–100) and improved to 80% (range 0-100) after surgery. The complication rate was 26.2% and two patients died during the perioperative period. Sixty-seven (62.6%) patients received postoperative local radio-oncologic and/or systemic therapy. Median postoperative EFS and OS were 7.1 (95%CI 5.8–8.2) and 11.1 (95%CI 8.4–13.6) months, respectively. The clinical status (postoperative KPS ≥ 70 (HR 0.27 95%CI 0.16–0.46; p < 0.001) remained the only independent factor for survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Surgical resection of recurrent BM may improve the clinical status and thus OS but is associated with a high complication rate; therefore a very careful patient selection is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Heßler
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie T Jünger
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna-Katharina Meissner
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Grau
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. .,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Fulda gAG, Academic Hospital of the University of Marburg, Fulda, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mitchell D, Kwon HJ, Kubica PA, Huff WX, O’Regan R, Dey M. Brain metastases: An update on the multi-disciplinary approach of clinical management. Neurochirurgie 2022; 68:69-85. [PMID: 33864773 PMCID: PMC8514593 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common malignant intracranial neoplasm in adults with over 100,000 new cases annually in the United States and outnumbering primary brain tumors 10:1. OBSERVATIONS The incidence of BM in adult cancer patients ranges from 10-40%, and is increasing with improved surveillance, effective systemic therapy, and an aging population. The overall prognosis of cancer patients is largely dependent on the presence or absence of brain metastasis, and therefore, a timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial for improving long-term outcomes, especially in the current era of significantly improved systemic therapy for many common cancers. BM should be suspected in any cancer patient who develops new neurological deficits or behavioral abnormalities. Gadolinium enhanced MRI is the preferred imaging technique and BM must be distinguished from other pathologies. Large, symptomatic lesion(s) in patients with good functional status are best treated with surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Due to neurocognitive side effects and improved overall survival of cancer patients, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is reserved as salvage therapy for patients with multiple lesions or as palliation. Newer approaches including multi-lesion stereotactic surgery, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are also being investigated to improve outcomes while preserving quality of life. CONCLUSION With the significant advancements in the systemic treatment for cancer patients, addressing BM effectively is critical for overall survival. In addition to patient's performance status, therapeutic approach should be based on the type of primary tumor and associated molecular profile as well as the size, number, and location of metastatic lesion(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mitchell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - HJ Kwon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - PA Kubica
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - WX Huff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - R O’Regan
- Department of Medicine/Hematology Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - M Dey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, UW Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA,Correspondence Should Be Addressed To: Mahua Dey, MD, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792; Tel: 317-274-2601;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Roshchina KE, Bekyashev AK, Gasparyan TG, Aleshin VA, Osinov IK, Savateev AN, Khalafyan DA. Modern possibilities of neurosurgical treatment of brain metastases. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEIROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2022; 86:119-125. [PMID: 36252202 DOI: 10.17116/neiro202286051119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Despite significant progress in neuroimaging and introduction of new combined treatments for solid tumors, brain metastases are still adverse factor for overall survival. Brain metastases are diagnosed in 8-10% of patients and associated with extremely poor prognosis. These lesions result focal and general cerebral symptoms. Literature review highlights the current principles of surgical treatment of metastatic brain lesions in patients with solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Roshchina
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Kh Bekyashev
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
- Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
| | - T G Gasparyan
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
- Scientific Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - V A Aleshin
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - I K Osinov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yu KKH, Imber BS, Moss NS. Multimodality durable salvage of recurrent brain metastases refractory to LITT, SRS and immunotherapy with resection and cesium-131 brachytherapy: case report and literature review. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:e245369. [PMID: 34920997 PMCID: PMC8685948 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BrM) are treated with multimodality therapy, however the optimal combination and timing of modalities in the setting of recurrent tumours that have failed prior treatments remain poorly defined. We present a case of a patient with biopsy-confirmed renal cell carcinoma BrM with good performance status initially treated with laser interstitial thermal ablation therapy (LITT) followed by stereotactic radiosurgery and dual checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. He subsequently developed rapid in-field recurrence which was treated with salvage surgical resection and implantation of intracavitary cesium-131 brachytherapy. The patient's disease remained stable through 18 months postoperatively. This case illustrates the range of options available and provides a combination salvage therapy strategy in a select group of locally recurrent patients who have exhausted conventional treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenny Kwok Hei Yu
- Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brandon S Imber
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cummins DD, Morshed RA, Chavez MM, Avalos LN, Sudhakar V, Chung JE, Gallagher A, Saggi S, Daras M, Braunstein S, Theodosopoulos PV, McDermott MW, Aghi MK. Salvage Surgery for Local Control of Brain Metastases After Previous Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Single-Center Series. World Neurosurg 2021; 158:e323-e333. [PMID: 34740830 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although overall survival (OS) has improved in patients with brain metastases (BMs), control of recurrent BMs remains a therapeutic challenge. Salvage surgery may achieve acceptable control rates in the setting of progression after previous stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), yet it remains a question how additional adjuvant therapies may affect outcomes and how patient selection for salvage surgery may be optimized. METHODS Patients receiving salvage surgery for BM progression after previous SRS were retrospectively reviewed from a single center. Outcomes of interest included local tumor progression, leptomeningeal dissemination, and OS. Cox proportional hazard models and nominal logistic regression were applied to determine factors associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS A total of 43 patients with 50 BMs were included. After salvage surgery, local progression was observed for 17 BMs (34%), leptomeningeal dissemination was observed in 17 patients (39.5%), and censored median OS was 17.9 months. On multivariate analysis, use of brachytherapy was associated with improved local control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.6; P = 0.008). For patients treated with SRS ≥4.5 months before salvage surgery, both brachytherapy (HR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.39; P = 0.002) and postoperative adjuvant SRS (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-1.00; P = 0.05) were associated with improved local control compared with no adjuvant radiation therapy. Presence of extracranial malignancy (HR, 6.70; 95% CI, 2.58-17.42; P < 0.0001) was associated with shorter survival. Graded prognostic assessment underestimated survival in 79.1% of patients, with a mean difference of 18.9 months between graded prognostic assessment-estimated and actual OS. CONCLUSIONS In properly selected patients, salvage surgery may be an appropriate therapy for BM progression after previous SRS. Adjuvant brachytherapy and repeat SRS can offer significant benefit for local control with salvage resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Cummins
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ramin A Morshed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Miguel M Chavez
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lauro N Avalos
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Vivek Sudhakar
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jason E Chung
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Aaron Gallagher
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Satvir Saggi
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Philip V Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boström JP, Jetschke K, Schmieder K, Adamietz IUA. [Surgical treatment and radiation therapy of brain metastases]. Radiologe 2021; 61:767-778. [PMID: 34272570 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00894-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this work is to outline the principles of interdisciplinary treatment of brain metastases. Interdisciplinary treatment is determined by the clinical situation, anatomical conditions and tumor entity and has the goal of reducing toxicity. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT are used to diagnose brain metastases. Neurosurgery is used for accessible, symptomatic metastases. For localized metastases, including multiple metastases, that are surgically inaccessible, radiosurgery is used. If possible, partial brain irradiation is preferred to whole-brain irradiation. Protection of the hippocampus during whole-brain radiotherapy reduces therapy toxicity. In emergency situations, steroids provide effective support and a neurosurgical intervention may be life-saving. The options for systemic drug therapy are increasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan P Boström
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Marien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Deutschland.,Gamma Knife Zentrum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Kathleen Jetschke
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Langendreer, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Kirsten Schmieder
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Langendreer, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Irenä Us A Adamietz
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radio-Onkologie, Marien Hospital Herne, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Deutschland. .,Gamma Knife Zentrum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland. .,Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Universitätsklinikum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hulsbergen AFC, Abunimer AM, Ida F, Kavouridis VK, Cho LD, Tewarie IA, Mekary RA, Schucht P, Phillips JG, Verhoeff JJC, Broekman MLD, Smith TR. Neurosurgical resection for locally recurrent brain metastasis. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:2085-2094. [PMID: 34270740 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with locally recurrent brain metastases (LRBMs), the role of (repeat) craniotomy is controversial. This study aimed to analyze long-term oncological outcomes in this heterogeneous population. METHODS Craniotomies for LRBM were identified from a tertiary neuro-oncological institution. First, we assessed overall survival (OS) and intracranial control (ICC) stratified by molecular profile, prognostic indices, and multimodality treatment. Second, we compared LRBMs to propensity score-matched patients who underwent craniotomy for newly diagnosed brain metastases (NDBM). RESULTS Across 180 patients, median survival after LRBM resection was 13.8 months and varied by molecular profile, with >24 months survival in ALK/EGFR+ lung adenocarcinoma and HER2+ breast cancer. Furthermore, 102 patients (56.7%) experienced intracranial recurrence; median time to recurrence was 5.6 months. Compared to NDBMs (n = 898), LRBM patients were younger, more likely to harbor a targetable mutation and less likely to receive adjuvant radiation (p < 0.05). After 1:3 propensity matching stratified by molecular profile, LRBM patients generally experienced shorter OS (hazard ratio 1.67 and 1.36 for patients with or without a mutation, p < 0.05) but similar ICC (hazard ratio 1.11 in both groups, p > 0.20) compared to NDBM patients with similar baseline. Results across specific molecular subgroups suggested comparable effect directions of varying sizes. CONCLUSIONS In our data, patients with LRBMs undergoing craniotomy comprised a subgroup of brain metastasis patients with relatively favorable clinical characteristics and good survival outcomes. Recurrent status predicted shorter OS but did not impact ICC. Craniotomy could be considered in selected, prognostically favorable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F C Hulsbergen
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Abdullah M Abunimer
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Fidelia Ida
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Vasileios K Kavouridis
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Logan D Cho
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, United States
| | - Ishaan A Tewarie
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Rania A Mekary
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Philippe Schucht
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bern, Kanton Bern, Switzerland
| | - John G Phillips
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Proescholdt MA, Schödel P, Doenitz C, Pukrop T, Höhne J, Schmidt NO, Schebesch KM. The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1616. [PMID: 33807384 PMCID: PMC8036330 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A. Proescholdt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Petra Schödel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Christian Doenitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Julius Höhne
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Nils Ole Schmidt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Karl-Michael Schebesch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mitsuya K, Nakasu Y, Hayashi N, Deguchi S, Oishi T, Sugino T, Yasui K, Ogawa H, Onoe T, Asakura H, Harada H. Retrospective analysis of salvage surgery for local progression of brain metastasis previously treated with stereotactic irradiation: diagnostic contribution, functional outcome, and prognostic factors. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:331. [PMID: 32303195 PMCID: PMC7165413 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06800-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic irradiation (STI) is a primary treatment for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases. Some of these patients experience local progression, which is difficult to differentiate from radiation necrosis, and difficult to treat. So far, just a few studies have clarified the prognosis and effectiveness of salvage surgery after STI. We evaluated the diagnostic value and improvement of functional outcomes after salvage surgery. Based on these results, we reconsidered surgical indication for patients with local progression after STI. Methods We evaluated patients with brain metastases treated with salvage surgery for local progression from October 2002 to July 2019. These patients had undergone salvage surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging findings and/or clinical evidence of post-STI local progression and stable systemic disease. We employed two prospective strategies according to the eloquency of the lesions. Lesions in non-eloquent areas had been resected completely with a safety margin, utilizing a fence-post method; while lesions in eloquent areas had been treated with minimal resection and postoperative STI. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the assessment of overall survival. Prognostic factors for survival were analyzed. Results Fifty-four salvage surgeries had been performed on 48 patients. The median age of patients was 63.5 years (range 36–79). The median interval from STI to surgery was 12 months. The median overall survival was 20.2 months from salvage surgery and 37.5 months from initial STI. Primary cancers were lung 31, breast 9, and others 8. Local recurrence developed in 13 of 54 lesions (24%). Leptomeningeal dissemination occurred after surgery in 3 patients (5.6%). Primary breast cancer (breast vs. lung: HR: 0.17), (breast vs. others: HR: 0.08) and RPA class 1–2 (RPA 1 vs. 3, HR:0.13), (RPA 2 vs 3, HR:0.4) were identified as good prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in multivariate analyses. The peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ≤3.65 predicted significantly longer OS (median 25.5 months) than an NLR > 3.65 (median 8 months). Conclusion We insist that salvage surgery leads to rapid improvement of neurological function and clarity of histological diagnosis. Salvage surgery is recommended for large lesions especially with surrounding edema either in eloquent or non-eloquent areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Mitsuya
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
| | - Yoko Nakasu
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Nakamasa Hayashi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Shoichi Deguchi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-nagakubo, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Takuma Oishi
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takashi Sugino
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Yasui
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Ogawa
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Onoe
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Asakura
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Radiation and Proton Therapy Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Brain metastases are a very common manifestation of cancer that have historically been approached as a single disease entity given the uniform association with poor clinical outcomes. Fortunately, our understanding of the biology and molecular underpinnings of brain metastases has greatly improved, resulting in more sophisticated prognostic models and multiple patient-related and disease-specific treatment paradigms. In addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded from whole-brain radiotherapy and surgery to include stereotactic radiosurgery, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are often used sequentially or in combination. Advances in neuroimaging have provided additional opportunities to accurately screen for intracranial disease at initial cancer diagnosis, target intracranial lesions with precision during treatment and help differentiate the effects of treatment from disease progression by incorporating functional imaging. Given the numerous available treatment options for patients with brain metastases, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended to personalize the treatment of each patient in an effort to improve the therapeutic ratio. Given the ongoing controversies regarding the optimal sequencing of the available and expanding treatment options for patients with brain metastases, enrolment in clinical trials is essential to advance our understanding of this complex and common disease. In this Review, we describe the key features of diagnosis, risk stratification and modern paradigms in the treatment and management of patients with brain metastases and provide speculation on future research directions.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Treatment of brain metastases represent a critical issue and different options have to be considered according to patients and tumour characteristics; in recent years, new therapeutic strategies have been proposed. In this review, we discuss the role of surgical resection on the basis of patient selection, new surgical techniques and the use of intraoperative adjuncts. The integration with postoperative whole brain radiotherapy will be also outlined because alternative treatment options are currently available. RECENT FINDINGS Surgical removal has been considered the mainstay in the treatment of brain metastases, in selected patients, with limited number of intracranial lesions and controlled primary disease, mainly in combination with whole brain radiotherapy. In the last few years, the increasing role of stereotactic focal radiotherapy has deeply modified the indications to open surgical procedures and whole brain radiotherapy. SUMMARY The appearance of brain metastases is considered a sign of bad prognosis. Treatment of these lesions is important for quality of life, providing local tumour control, preventing death from neurological causes and improving survival, although potentially only in a minority of patients. Careful patient selection, with adequate evaluation of clinical prognostic score, the use of appropriate surgical techniques and surgical adjuncts are major determinants of favourable outcome in patients undergoing resection of brain metastases.
Collapse
|
19
|
Survival and prognostic factors in surgically treated brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2019; 143:359-367. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03171-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
20
|
Romagna A, Alexander R, Schwartz C, Ladisich B, Hitzl W, Heidorn SC, Winkler PA, Muacevic A. CyberKnife Radiosurgery in Recurrent Brain Metastases: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks? Cureus 2018; 10:e3741. [PMID: 30800551 PMCID: PMC6384047 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Local treatment concepts are in high demand in the salvage treatment of recurrent brain metastases. Still, their risks and benefits are scarcely characterized. In this study, we analyzed the outcome and risk-/benefit-ratio of salvage CyberKnife (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, California, US) radiosurgery in the treatment of recurrent brain metastases after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Materials and methods Seventy-six patients with 166 recurrent brain metastases and a multimodal pretreatment were retrospectively investigated. All patients underwent salvage CyberKnife radiosurgery (single fraction, reference dose: 17-22 Gy). Study endpoints were post-recurrence survival (PRS) after salvage treatment as well as local and distant tumor control rates. Central nervous system (CNS) toxicity was assessed according to the toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC)). Results The population was homogenous regarding its demographic parameters. All patients had a history of WBRT prior to salvage CyberKnife radiosurgery. PRS was 13.3 months (10.4 - 16.2 months), one-year local and distant tumor control rates were 87% (95% CI: 75-99) and 38% (95% CI: 23-52), respectively. Eighteen patients suffered from RTOG/EORTC grade I/II toxicity. No toxicity-related risk factors were identified. Discussion This study found indicative survival and tumor control rates as well as a favorable risk/benefit ratio regarding radiotoxicity in salvage CyberKnife radiosurgery. These results point to a proactive therapeutic strategy based on appropriate patient selection instead of therapeutic nihilism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Romagna Alexander
- Neurosurgery, Christian-Doppler-Medical Center, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, AUT
| | - Christoph Schwartz
- Neurosurgery, Christian-Doppler-Medical Center, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, AUT
| | - Barbara Ladisich
- Neurosurgery, Christian-Doppler-Medical Center, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, AUT
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Biostatistics, Christian-Doppler-Medical Center, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, AUT
| | | | - Peter A Winkler
- Neurosurgery, Christian-Doppler-Medical Center, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, AUT
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kamp MA, Fischer I, Dibué-Adjei M, Munoz-Bendix C, Cornelius JF, Steiger HJ, Slotty PJ, Turowski B, Rapp M, Sabel M. Predictors for a further local in-brain progression after re-craniotomy of locally recurrent cerebral metastases. Neurosurg Rev 2017; 41:813-823. [DOI: 10.1007/s10143-017-0931-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
22
|
Ferguson SD, Wagner KM, Prabhu SS, McAleer MF, McCutcheon IE, Sawaya R. Neurosurgical management of brain metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 2017; 34:377-389. [PMID: 28965270 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-017-9860-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases present a significant public health issue, affecting more than 100,000 patients per year in the U.S. and result in significant morbidity. Brain metastases can occur in a variety of clinical situations ranging from multiple brain metastases with uncontrolled systemic disease to a solitary metastasis in the setting of controlled systemic disease. Additionally, advances in genomics have broadened the opportunities for targeted treatment options and potentially more durable systemic responses. As such, the treatment of brain metastases is now more tailored and multimodal, involving systemic, radiation, and surgical therapies, often in combination. This review discusses the historical and current role of neurosurgical techniques in the treatment of brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Kathryn M Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Mary F McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Raymond Sawaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu Z, Lei B, Zheng M, Li Z, Huang S, Deng Y. Prognostic factors in patients treated with surgery for brain metastases: A single-center retrospective analysis of 125 patients. Int J Surg 2017; 44:204-209. [PMID: 28528216 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUD Brain metastases are the most common malignant intracranial tumors, however, the prognosis of patients is still poor despite multiple treatment have been applicated. The aim of this study was to analyse parameters influence overall survival from patient, tumor and treatment. Summarized characteristics of long-time (>2 years) survivors furtherly. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, clinical data of 125patients between 2004 and 2015 were collected and the parameters from patients, tumor and treatment were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank test, multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression model, respectively. RESULTS Median overall survival time was 14.5 (95% confidence interval were 12.3-16.7) months and median survival time was 34.5 (95% confidence interval were 30.1-38.9) months in long-time survivors, respectively.KPS, RPA, GPA, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, treatment pattern and resection method were identified influence survival time significantly by univariate analysis. KPS, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases and treatment pattern were independent prognosis factors by multivariate analysis. Long-time survivors obtain higher KPS, complete resection, adjuvant therapy postoperative more commonly. CONCLUSION Higher KPS, GPA I,RPA3.5∼4, single brain metastases, adjuvant therapy postoperative and complete resection were significant improve survival time, however, extracranial metastases significant decreased survival time. Patients who have good status and received multimodality therapy involved complete resection can survive longer time more commonly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenghao Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Bingxi Lei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Meiguang Zheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhongjun Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuaibin Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuefei Deng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The surgical resection of metastases is nowadays feasible in selected patients with multifocal metastatic disease due to the implementation of interdisciplinary multimodal therapeutic options. Anatomical limitations do not seem to represent obstacles which cannot be overcome because of the development of new surgical techniques. The cornerstone of the selection of patients is the correct staging diagnosis achieved through modern diagnostic tools; however, surgery alone does not always offer acceptable survival and recurrence-free rates. Furthermore, in every complex surgical procedure there is the risk of morbidity and mortality; therefore, parameters such as alternative therapeutic modalities, the individual situation of the patient and tumor biology have to be considered in order to make the correct selection of patients. This is one of the major future challenges and should never be driven by unfounded hopes and expectations of the patients. The same principle also applies for brain metastases, which represent the most common brain tumors. Approximately 70 % of patients with brain metastases have 1-3 lesions (oligometastases). Treatment is now individualized and the goal of therapy has shifted towards long-term survival (≥ 24 months) and improved quality of life. Under this aspect surgery is one of the important treatment options, particularly in patients with a single metastasis or oligometastases. Furthermore, approximately 20 % of patients who have recurrent brain metastases, successfully undergo a complete resection of tumors and with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score > 70 show a long-term survival of ≥ 24 months.
Collapse
|
25
|
Prognostic factors and long-term survival in surgically treated brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 142:72-80. [PMID: 26816105 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 12/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults. Despite multimodal treatment options such as microsurgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, prognosis still remains very poor. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes the most common source of brain metastases. In this study, prognostic factors in this patient population were identified through an in-depth analysis of clinical parameters of patients with BMs from NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical data of 114 NSCLC cancer patients who underwent surgery for BMs at the University Hospital Heidelberg were retrospectively reviewed for age, gender, type of treatment, time course of the disease, presence of neurologic symptoms, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), smoking history, presence of extracranial metastases at initial diagnosis of NSCLC, number, location and size of brain metastases. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Log-rank test and Cox' proportional hazard model, respectively. RESULTS Median survival time from surgery for BMs was 11.2 months. 18.4% (21 of 114) patients were long-term survivors (>24 months; range 26.3-75.1 months). Age, gender, size and number of intracranial metastases were not significantly associated with patient survival. Univariate analysis identified complete resection, postoperative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and a preoperative KPS of >80% as positive prognostic factors. Infratentorial location and presence of extracranial metastases were shown to be negative prognostic factors. Surgery for the primary tumor was associated with a superior patient outcome both in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION Our data strongly suggest that surgical treatment of the primary tumor and complete resection of brain metastases in NSCLC patients followed by WBRT improve survival. Moreover, long-term survivors (>2 years) were more frequent than previously reported.
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Oliveira MDL, Picarelli H, Menezes MR, Teixeira MJ, Bor-Seng-Shu E. Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound for brain tumor surgery. Neurosurgery 2014; 76:E104-5. [PMID: 25255267 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo de Lima Oliveira
- Divison of Neurological Surgery Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine University of São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|