Early life-threating enlargement of a vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife radiosurgery

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma - A Case-Based Practice Guide From the Radiosurgery Society

PURPOSE

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are the most common benign intracranial nerve sheath tumors. Surgery and radiation therapy - particularly stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) - are the primary treatment options. SRS is the dominant treatment for small- and medium-sized VS and selected larger tumors due to its excellent local control rates and favorable safety profile compared with surgery. However, careful treatment planning is essential, taking into account patient preferences, tumor location and size, symptoms, and anticipated treatment-related toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four clinical VS scenarios have been selected to illustrate the use of SRS, including a unilateral small intracanalicular VS, a large VS with cystic components, reirradiation with SRS after local tumor recurrence, and bilateral VS in the setting of neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis.

RESULTS

SRS is an effective and safe treatment modality for the majority of VS cases, requiring careful treatment planning and a thorough understanding of potential limitations and challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

This case-based practice guide aims to provide a concise overview of the treatment of VS with SRS. We present and discuss 4 different clinical scenarios of VS to highlight the pitfalls and best practice recommendations.

Clinical practice guideline on the management of vestibular schwannoma

INTRODUCTION

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC.

RESULTS

A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts.

From the perspective of pseudo-progression rather than treatment failure, how long should we wait before considering treatment failure if large cystic enlargement occurs after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma?: insight into pseudoprogression based on two case reports

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been accepted as a safe and effective treatment for vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, during follow-up, tumor expansion induced by irradiation can occur, and diagnosis of failure in radiosurgery for VS is still controversial. Tumor expansion with cystic enlargement causes some confusion regarding whether further treatment should be performed. We analyzed more than 10 years of clinical findings and imaging of patients with VS with cystic enlargement after GKRS. A 49-year-old male with hearing impairment was treated with GKRS (12 Gy; isodose, 50%) for a left VS with a preoperative tumor volume of 0.8 cc. The tumor size increased with cystic changes from the third year after GKRS, reaching a volume of 10.8 cc at 5 years after GKRS. At the 6th year of follow-up, the tumor volume started to decrease, up to 0.3 cc by the 14th year of follow-up. A 52-year-old female with hearing impairment and left facial numbness was treated with GKRS for a left VS (13 Gy; isodose, 50%). The preoperative tumor volume was 6.3 cc, which started to increase with cystic enlargement from the first year after GKRS, and reaching 18.2 cc by 5 years after GKRS. The tumor maintained a cystic pattern with slight changes in size, but no other neurologic symptoms developed during the follow-up period. After 6 years of GKRS, tumor regression was observed, eventually reaching a volume of 3.2 cc by the 13th year of follow-up. In both cases, persistent cystic enlargement in VS was observed at 5 years after GKRS, after which the tumors began to stabilize. After more than 10 years of GKRS, the tumor volume was less than that before GKRS. Enlargement with large cystic formation in the first 3-5 years after GKRS has been considered as treatment failure. However, our cases show that further treatment for cystic enlargement should be deferred for at least 10 years, especially in patients without neurological deterioration, as inadequate surgery can be prevented within that period.

The Effectiveness of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Determining Radiological Response after Radiosurgery in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) in demonstrating functional changes in the tumor in determining the response to treatment after radiosurgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is not clear yet.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to determine the change in total tumor volume (TTV) in terms of radiological response in patients who had VS and were treated with radiosurgery and investigated the relationship between the TTV, follow-up times and DTI parameters.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were assessed using DTI and MRI. TTV, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fractional anisotropy (FA) were calculated. Patients were divided into three groups: those who responded to the treatment (group 1) (n=11), those who did not (group 0) (n=9) and those who remained stable (group 2) (n=11).

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 28.81±14 months. ADC values increased in patients with VS after radiosurgery (p=0.004). There was no statistical difference in the FA values. A significant reduction in TTV after radiosurgery was detected in group 1 (p=0.003). ADC values increased significantly after radiosurgery in group 2 (p=0.04). Although there were no significant differences, ADC values after radiosurgery increased in group 1 and group 0.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values continuously increase due to radiation damage in the period before the tumor volume shrinks after radiosurgery. We think that it is not appropriate to diagnose inadequate treatment or progression only when TTV is evaluated in terms of response to treatment in the early period after radiosurgery.