Efficacy and safety of a new Botulinum Toxin Type A free of complexing proteins in the treatment of blepharospasm

Patient-reported outcomes following a break in ophthalmic botulinum toxin therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a break in botulinum toxin treatment, necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, on patients' quality of life.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of all patients undergoing incobotulinumtoxinA treatment in our department-for benign essential blepharospasm (BEB), hemifacial spasm (HFS), aberrant facial regeneration (AFR), or crocodile tears-who were affected by the break in service (March 18, 2020-June 17, 2020). All patients who received treatment both before and after the break in service were included. Data gathered included subjective patient-reported measure of "time until treatment failure" and disease rating scale scores: Blepharospasm-Dystonia Functional Disability Assessment Scale (BDFDAS; for BEB, HFS, and AFR); Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS; for BEB and HFS); and TEARS Epiphora Grading Scale (for crocodile tears).

RESULTS

Across 72 patients, there was a mean treatment delay of 3.9 months (range, 0-9.8 months). After a period of effect, treatment failed in all patients, with a mean time until treatment failure of 3.9 months (range, 0.5-12.0 months). All patient-reported outcome measurements increased, with greatest effect seen in AFR (178% increase in BDFDAS) and BEB (41% increase in JRS). At least 2 patients sought and underwent retreatment elsewhere in the private sector because of their symptom severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AFR and BEB are likely to tolerate a break in service least, whereas patients with crocodile tears appear to be less affected. This real-world snapshot allows quantification of the harm caused by a break in botulinum toxin service or a treatment delay. This study provides valuable information should further breaks in service or treatment delay be considered in the future due to a further wave of COVID-19 or other reasons.

Quantitative assessment of botulinum toxin injection on blink rate in blepharospasm

PURPOSE

To objectively measure the blink rate in patients with blepharospasm managed by botulinum toxin type-A injections.

METHODS

In this prospective, non-interventional case series, the complete blink rates of subjects were measured before incobotulinumtoxina injection and at follow-up within 4 weeks using slow-motion video-taping. Additionally, subjects graded the frequency of blinking, the severity of light-sensitivity, and the severity and frequency of dry eye symptoms on a categorical visual analog scale. The results are reported as median (range).

RESULTS

Ten subjects were enrolled, with nine females. The total duration of treatment was 70 (5-116) months with total of 27.5 (2-51) injections. The subjects were grouped as short-time (<52w) or long-time (>52w) treatments. The median age, follow-up time, and injected doses were 73.5 (49-81) years, 21 (14-28) days, and 38 (8-47) units, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. The total complete blinks per minute before incobotulinumtoxina injection was 39 (23-64) which decreased to 18.5 (1-60) at follow-up (p = 0.004). The average change in complete blink rate was -67.4 ± 23.7% in long-time and -45.2 ± 31.2% in short-time groups (mean ± SD, p = 0.01). The total self-graded frequency of blinking and light-sensitivity decreased significantly at follow-up (p = 0.004, p = 0.047, respectively). Similar patterns of subject reported grades were seen in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Videotaping is a low-cost method for objective measurement of blink rate in blepharospasm patients after incobotulinumtoxina injection. There was a significant reduction in blink rate after incobotulinumtoxina injections with higher percentage of change in the long-time treatment group. Incobotulinumtoxina injection also significantly improves subjective photophobia.

Comparison of Botulinum neurotoxin efficiency in dystonia associated with Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonism: a retrospective study with a self-reported improvement scale

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is a useful therapeutic option to treat dystonic manifestations. Data on its efficiency on dystonia associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) or atypical parkinsonism (AP) are scarce and no comparison of the efficiency of BoNT has been performed between these diseases and between the different localizations of dystonia in these pathologies. We retrospectively collected from patients' medical records the result of 611 BoNT injections in 63 dystonic parkinsonian patients (44 PD and 19 AP) using a self-reported clinical improvement scale and duration of effect. Using these data, we modeled the degree of improvement and its duration after BoNT treatment with a linear mixed model. This allowed us to assess the influence of clinical parameters on the reported treatment efficiency. On a scale from 0 to 100, patients with PD and AP, respectively, report a mean improvement of 69% and 55% after BoNT injection and it is similar regarding the different localizations of dystonia. Duration of effect is, however, longer in PD compared to AP (P = 0.023). Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics had no effect on the degree of improvement or duration of effect. Overall, our results support the use of BoNT in the various dystonic phenomena associated with degenerative parkinsonian syndromes. Shorter delays between injection sessions should be considered in AP compared to PD.Trial registration: This study was registered on Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04948684).

Dynamic muscle paralytic effects of a novel botulinum toxin A free of neurotoxin-associated proteins

Structurally, botulinum toxin type A (BTX‐A) is composed of neurotoxin and nontoxic complexing proteins (CPs), and the neurotoxin has the function of blocking acetylcholine release from the neuromuscular junction and therefore paralyzing muscles. Nowadays, a novel botulinum toxin A free of CPs (chinbotulinumtoxin A, A/Chin) is produced, and the present study comprehensively evaluated the dynamic paralytic effect of A/Chin on the gastrocnemius muscle of rats. Different doses (0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 U) of A/Chin and other BTX‐As with and without CPs were administered to the gastrocnemius muscles of rats and muscle strength was measured and compared at different postinjection timepoints (from day 0 to 84). With the dose increased, time‐to‐peak paralytic effect of other BTX‐As varied from day 3 to day 14, while A/Chin groups showed rapid and steady time to peak on day 3. At the lowest dose of 0.01 U, A/Chin showed significantly better peak paralytic effect than the others on day 3. When the dose increased to 0.5 U and more, A/Chin group also showed significant paralytic effect when the paralytic effect of other BTX‐As was worn off. Moreover, the paralytic effect of A/Chin was confirmed as muscle atrophy while hematoxylin–eosin staining was performed. In conclusion, compared with other BTX‐As, A/Chin showed rapid and steady time‐to‐peak paralytic effect and long‐term paralytic efficacy at the same dose level. And it might lay a solid foundation for further wide application of A/Chin in both clinical and cosmetic areas.

A patient-initiated treatment model for blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm: a randomized controlled trial

Background

To test, in a two-arm, single center, superiority, randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of and costs associated with a patient-initiated treatment model for people with hemifacial spasm (HFS) and blepharospasm (BEB) in comparison to usual care.

Methods

One hundred and thirty patients with HFS or BEB, aged 18 years or over, were recruited from a nurse-led botulinum toxin type A clinic at an eye hospital in the United Kingdom (UK), completed baseline measures and were randomized (1:1). The intervention group determined their own botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) treatment schedule during the trial period (9 months) and received an information leaflet with a “hotline” number to book an appointment. Usual care appointments were scheduled by treating clinicians. Data analysts were blind to study group. The primary outcomes were disease severity and functional disability, as measured by the Jankovic Rating Scale and Blepharospasm Disability Index, respectively. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, anxiety and depression, satisfaction with care, confidence in the service, economic costs and employment days lost.

Results

Sixty-five patients were randomized to each group. The intervention demonstrated no statistically significant difference to usual care for any of primary outcomes. On secondary outcomes the levels of anxiety differed significantly (F_{2, 142.39} = 1.65, p = 0.02), with the intervention arm exhibiting a decrease and the control arm an increase (Hedges’ g = − 0.26 [99% CI -0.83, 0.32]). No other statistically significant differences were found for secondary outcomes. Overall healthcare costs and costs to the patient were on average £198.95 less (95% CI -£256.76, £654.67; p = 0.10) per participant for those in the intervention compared to usual care, although this finding was not significant.

Conclusions

We did not observe differences between the patient-initiated treatment model and usual care for people with BEB or HFS, on any primary outcome measure, quality of life, or depression. The patient-initiated treatment model may, however, have the potential to save healthcare costs and reduce anxiety. Patients using this new model were also equally as satisfied in the service and confident in their care as those receiving treatment as usual.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT02577224, 16th October 2015.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02603-7.

Incobotulinum toxin A with a one-year long-lasting effect for trapezius contouring and superior efficacy for the treatment of trapezius myalgia

Context:

Based on various Botulinum toxin A products, reports of the lower efficacy of Incobotulinum toxin A compared with Onabotulinum toxin A for muscle contouring were observed. In addition, complications of trapezius myalgia and shoulder contouring treatment from malpractice have been reported.

Aims:

The study aimed at comparing the efficacy between Incobotulinum toxin A and Onabotulinum toxin A; research was conducted on a safe treatment technique for trapezius hypertrophy and trapezius myalgia.

Materials and Methods:

A split-shoulder, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed. Twenty volunteers with trapezius hypertrophy and trapezius myalgia were randomly injected with 30 units of Incobotulinum toxin A and Onabotulinum toxin A in each trapezius muscle guided by ultrasound.

Results:

The trapezius thickness among those receiving treatment with Onabotulinum toxin A and Incobotulinum toxin A on day 60 was 7.35 ± 1.11 and 7.33 ± 1.21 mm, respectively, which did not portray a significant difference (P = 0.991). Compared with the muscle size from day 60 to one year, the size of the trapezius muscle that had been treated by Onabotulinum toxin type A regained a significantly larger size compared with that treated by Incobotulinum toxin A (P = 0.027). On comparing the size of the trapezius muscle treated by Incobotulinum toxin A between one year and day 0, it was observed that the trapezius thickness at one year had significantly decreased (P < 0.001). On comparing the pain score from day 60 to day 0, it was observed that the pain scores of trapezius myalgia treated by Onabotulinum toxin A and Incobotulinum toxin A significantly differed (P = 0.003).

Conclusions:

Incobotulinum toxin A had the same efficacy but a longer lasting effect for the trapezius size contouring and a higher efficacy for trapezius myalgia treatment compared with Onabotulinum toxin A.

Onabotulinumtoxin Type A Dosage for Upper Face Expression Lines in Males: A Systematic Review of Current Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin injection is the most commonly performed minimally invasive aesthetic procedure in men. Despite various recommendations by experts on the use of onabotulinumtoxin type A in the literature, distinct guidelines for its use in males and females do not exist.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to delineate safe and effective doses for the use of onabotulinumtoxin type A in males for correction of upper facial expression lines.

METHODS

PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, the Cochrane database, and Google Scholar were searched from 2002 to 2019 inclusive. Three researchers independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data, checked for accuracy, and assessed the evidence with AGREE II.

RESULTS

Average dosing recommended for the treatment of upper face expression lines was specific to glabellar frown lines, crow's feet, and horizontal forehead lines. Changing trends and gender variation was noted in each of the studies. Six of the 11 recommendations suggest the need to alter dosing in male patients, although do not give separate recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an urgent need for up-to-date recommendations for the use of onabotulinumtoxin type A in upper face expression lines of male patients.

Immunogenicity of Botulinum Toxin Formulations: Potential Therapeutic Implications

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are proteins produced by bacteria of the Clostridium family. Upon oral ingestion, BoNT causes the neuroparalytic syndrome botulism. There are seven serotypes of BoNT (serotypes A-G); BoNT-A and BoNT-B are the botulinum toxin serotypes utilized for therapeutic applications. Treatment with BoNT injections is used to manage chronic medical conditions across multiple indications. As with other biologic drugs, immunogenicity after long-term treatment with BoNT formulations may occur, and repeated use can elicit antibody formation leading to clinical nonresponsiveness. Thus, approaching BoNT treatment of chronic conditions with therapeutic formulations that minimize stimulating the host immune response while balancing patient responsiveness to therapy is ideal. Immunogenicity is a clinical limitation in many settings that use biologic drugs for treatment, and clinically relevant immunogenicity reduction has been achieved through engineering smaller protein constructs and reducing unnecessary formulation components. A similar approach has influenced the evolution of BoNT formulations. Three BoNT-A products and one BoNT-B product have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for therapeutic use: onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, incobotulinumtoxinA, and rimabotulinumtoxinB; a fourth BoNT-A product, daxibotulinumtoxinA, is currently under regulatory review. Additionally, prabotulinumtoxinA is a BoNT-A product that has been approved for aesthetic indications but not therapeutic use. Here, we discuss the preclinical and clinical immunogenicity data that exist within the scientific literature and provide a perspective for considering immunogenicity as a key factor in choice of BoNT formulation.

Duration and onset of effect of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of blepharospasm in botulinum toxin-naïve subjects

OBJECTIVE

Blepharospasm is a focal dystonia whereby excessive eyelid muscle contractions cause involuntary eye closure. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injections are an approved treatment. This randomized placebo-controlled trial (NCT01896895; EudraCT number 2012-004821-26) assessed the efficacy, safety, and treatment effect duration of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH), a BoNT-A formulation without complexing proteins, in BoNT-A-naïve adults with blepharospasm.

METHODS

Subjects received incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, 25 U (total dose) or placebo during a main study period (MP; 6-20 weeks). Patients needing a second injection received incobotulinumtoxinA ≤70 U in an open-label extension period (EP; 6-20 weeks). Treatment effect durations were time from first injection to EP injection or final MP visit and from EP injection to end-of-study visit. Times to effect onset and to waning of effect (MP) were time from injection to first subject-assessed onset effect and time from injection to subject-reported waning of effect, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 61 subjects, 39 entered the EP. During the MP, median duration of treatment effect was longer with incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U (20 weeks) versus incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U (11 weeks) or placebo (6 weeks). Median duration of treatment effect was 20 weeks during the EP. Median time to effect onset was 5, 7, and 14 days with 50 U, 25 U, and placebo, respectively (p = .022 for 50 U versus placebo). Median time to waning of treatment effect was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

Subjects reported an effect onset from 5 days after injection lasting up to 20 weeks (maximum observation period). Data indicate that incobotulinumtoxinA re-treatment of blepharospasm may not be required at fixed 12-week intervals and provide evidence for a patient-tailored approach.

Real-World Dosing of OnabotulinumtoxinA and IncobotulinumtoxinA for Cervical Dystonia and Blepharospasm: Results from TRUDOSE and TRUDOSE II

The real-world use of onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA for cervical dystonia and blepharospasm treatment was assessed in two separate retrospective studies using identical protocols (TRUDOSE and TRUDOSE II). The studies were conducted in Mexico, Norway, and United Kingdom and designed to evaluate dose utilization of the two botulinum toxins in clinical practice. Eighty-three patients treated with both onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA for ≥2 years for each botulinum toxin were included, (52, cervical dystonia; 31, blepharospasm). All patients switched from onabotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA for administrative/financial reasons. A range of dose ratios (incobotulinumtoxinA to onabotulinumtoxinA) was reported; with the majority of dose ratios being >1. The mean dose ratio was >1 regardless of the study site or underlying clinical condition. The inter-injection interval was significantly longer for onabotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA when assessed for all patients (15.5 vs. 14.3 weeks; p = 0.006), resulting in fewer onabotulinumtoxinA treatments over the study time period. Consistent with product labeling, no single fixed-dose ratio exists between incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA. The dosage of each should be individualized based on patient needs and used as per product labeling. These real-world utilization data may have pharmacoeconomic implications.

Real-World Six-Year National Cost-Minimization Analysis of IncobotulinumtoxinA and OnabotulinumtoxinA in the VA/DoD Healthcare Systems

Purpose

This study sought to perform a real-world, long-term cost-minimization analysis for incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®) versus onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox^®), given the established non-inferiority when utilized at similar doses.

Methods

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Defense (DoD) national healthcare systems were included in this analysis. Real-world purchase data for incobotulinumtoxinA were used to estimate the direct drug costs between calendar years 2014 and 2019. Publicly available federal pharmaceutical prices (Federal Supply Schedule and Big 4) were used. The primary outcome was the difference in total direct costs nationally for incobotulinumtoxinA (real-world) versus having hypothetically utilized onabotulinumtoxinA (projected) for similar utilization. Sites utilizing ≥100 vials (of 100 Unit equivalents) of incobotulinumtoxinA annually were categorized as “major adopters”. IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 Unit vials were assumed to be an alternative to a 100 Unit vial of onabotulinumtoxinA for 50% of such vial purchases in the base case scenario to account for differences in wastage.

Results

Over the six-year study time frame, 156 sites (76.8%) utilized incobotulinumtoxinA of the 203 total VA healthcare systems and DoD medical centers. Of these sites, 67 were major adopters for at least one year, with a mean of 3.4 years spent as a major adopter over the study period. Average annual savings per major adopter was $105,782. IncobotulinumtoxinA costs for all VA/DoD sites was $46.39 million for the six-year period versus a projected $71.92 million onabotulinumtoxinA cost—a total savings of $25.53 million (35.5% relative reduction). Approximately, 82.8% of savings stemmed from lower drug acquisition cost ($21.14 million) and 17.2% of savings ($4.39 million) was related to reduced wastage. It was estimated that a total of 9958 extra onabotulinumtoxinA 100 Unit vials would have been wasted during the six-year period, translating to the need for a 5.9% increase in vial purchases versus incobotulinumtoxinA.

Conclusion

Meaningful cost savings were realized related to incobotulinumtoxinA adoption over a long-term time frame in the VA/DoD healthcare systems.

A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine Effects of Increasing Doses and Dose-Response Relationship of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Glabellar Rhytids

BACKGROUND

IncobotulinumtoxinA is an effective neuromodulator for treating glabellar rhytids. The relationship between dose and reduction in rhytid severity is well established. However, the effects of escalating doses on the treatment duration response are less understood.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of increasing doses of incobotulinumtoxinA on the treatment duration for glabellar rhytids.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, Phase IV study was conducted at a fully accredited, outpatient surgical facility. Subjects (31 female, 7 male) with moderate to severe glabellar rhytids were randomized to 1 of 3 incobotulinumtoxinA dose groups: 20, 60, or 100 U. Effect duration was determined by calculating the time to return to baseline for dynamic glabellar lines during maximal contraction. Follow-up was completed through 1 year, and adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

The median duration of effect was 120 days (95% confidence interval [CI] [90, 180 days]), 180 days (95% CI [180, 210 days]), and 270 days (95% CI [240, 330 days]) for the 20-, 60-, and 100-U groups, respectively. A Wald chi-square test from the Cox regression on the primary efficacy variable indicated a statistically significant effect of dose group on time to baseline (chi square = 54.63; df = 2; P < 0.001). Hazard ratios were HR = 0.21 (95% CI [0.10; 0.43] for the 60-U vs the 20-U group, and HR = 0.06 (95% CI [0.10; 0.43]) for the 100-U vs the 20-U group, indicating a statistically longer return to baseline for both the 60- and 100-U cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a dose-dependent relationship between incobotulinumtoxinA and duration of effect in the glabella.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Comparison of botulinum toxins for treatment of movement disorders: real-world utilization and cost analysis in a national Medicare population

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is the single largest payer for health care in the United States and the largest payer by spending globally. Medicare Part B, with more than 50 million beneficiaries, currently has no broad mechanisms in place for promoting cost-effective care of injectable drugs. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a real-world utilization and cost analysis comparing botulinum toxins in movement disorders. METHODS: The 2017 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier dataset from CMS was used for this claims level analysis. Neurologists, ophthalmologists, or physiatrists who injected predominantly for movement disorders (defined as blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, sialorrhea, and/or spasticity) were included along with their patients. Botulinum toxins with FDA indications spanning these 3 specialties were included. RESULTS: A total of 891 physicians (406 ophthalmologists, 338 neurologists, and 147 physiatrists) along with their 29,954 botulinum toxin (27,441 onabotulinumtoxinA and 2,513 incobotulinumtoxinA) patients were included in the analysis. The average total drug cost per patient per year (PPPY) was significantly lower for incobotulinumtoxinA versus onabotulinumtoxinA ($2,099 vs. $3,115; P < 0.001), for an average savings of 32.6%. Annual average out-of-pocket costs were also significantly less expensive for incobotulinumtoxinA versus onabotulinumtoxinA ($486 vs. $719; P < 0.001), for an average savings of 32.4%. Across 74,346 total injection visits, there was no significant difference in dosing between the agents, with an average dosing ratio of 0.94 incobotulinumtoxinA to 1.0 onabotulinumtoxinA. Injections PPPY were 2.42 for onabotulinumtoxinA and 2.29 for incobotulinumtoxinA. Average reported wastage was 64% higher for onabotulinumtoxinA than it was for incobotulinumtoxinA. A budget impact analysis estimated that increasing incobotulinumtoxinA use in the movement disorder space to attain an overall 20% botulinum toxin market share would save Medicare $32.9 million over a 3-year period versus current use. CONCLUSIONS: IncobotulinumtoxinA was shown to be a less costly alternative than onabotulinumtoxinA with similar dosing in real-world practice in this large national Medicare population. Policies to increase use of agents that promote cost-effective evidence-based care should be further explored and implemented for this fundamental federal payer. DISCLOSURES: This research received no external funding. Kazerooni was an employee of Merz Pharmaceuticals at the time of the analysis. Watanabe received no compensation or funding for this research project. Watanabe is a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Forum on Drug, Discovery, Development, and Translation. This information, content, and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by the U.S. government or the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering.

Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders: An Update

Since its initial approval in 1989 by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of blepharospasm and other facial spasms, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has evolved into a therapeutic modality for a variety of neurological and non-neurological disorders. With respect to neurologic movement disorders, BoNT has been reported to be effective for the treatment of dystonia, bruxism, tremors, tics, myoclonus, restless legs syndrome, tardive dyskinesia, and a variety of symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease. More recently, research with BoNT has expanded beyond its use as a powerful muscle relaxant and a peripherally active drug to its potential central nervous system applications in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. Although BoNT is the most potent biologic toxin, when it is administered by knowledgeable and experienced clinicians, it is one of the safest therapeutic agents in clinical use. The primary aim of this article is to provide an update on recent advances in BoNT research with a focus on novel applications in the treatment of movement disorders. This comprehensive review of the literature provides a critical review of evidence-based clinical trials and highlights recent innovative pilot studies.

IncobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Blepharospasm in Toxin-Naïve Subjects: A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

This study aimed to assess the efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) in botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects with blepharospasm. Botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects (≥ 12 months without botulinum neurotoxin treatment for blepharospasm) received single-dose incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, 25 U, or placebo. Subjects were followed for 6-20 weeks (main period). Qualified subjects entered an open-label extension period and received another incobotulinumtoxinA injection (≤ 70 U). The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) severity subscore at the main period of week 6. Other efficacy variables included changes in the Blepharospasm Disability Index score and JRS frequency subscore and sumscore. Adverse events were monitored. Sixty-one subjects were randomized (main period: incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, n = 19; incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, n = 22; placebo, n = 20); 39 entered the open-label extension period (9, 14, and 16 subjects from the incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, and placebo groups [main period], respectively, changed to open-label extension period dosing). A statistically significantly greater reduction in JRS severity subscore was reported for subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U versus placebo (ANCOVA, least square mean difference: - 1.2, p = 0.0004). Subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA experienced improvements in other efficacy variables versus baseline and/or placebo. Sustained clinical improvements and low adverse event rates (22.2-42.1%) were observed. This is the second placebo-controlled, double-blind study that demonstrates favorable efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in subjects with blepharospasm. IncobotulinumtoxinA is the first botulinum neurotoxin that could fulfill the American Academy of Neurology criteria for a Level A recommendation for blepharospasm.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01896895.

Postmarketing safety surveillance data reveals antidepressant effects of botulinum toxin across various indications and injection sites

The World Health Organization estimates the number of people suffering from depression to be over 264 million. Current monoamine transmission modulating therapeutics, even with proper adherence and acceptable tolerability, are not effective for nearly one third of the patients, leading clinicians to explore other therapeutic options such as electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, ketamine infusions, and, more recently, glabellar botulinum toxin, BoNT, injections. The scale and mechanism of antidepressant action of BoNT is unclear and maybe hypothetically attributed to the disruption of proprioceptive facial feedback reinforcing negative emotions. Here we verify the antidepressant effect of botulinum toxin by analysis of over 40 thousand BoNT treatment reports out of thirteen million postmarketing safety reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, FAERS. The results of the analysis indicate that patients who received BoNT injections to treat hyperhidrosis, facial wrinkles, migraine prophylaxis, spasticity, and spasms, had a significantly lower number of depression reports when compared to patients undergoing different treatments for the same conditions. These findings suggest that the antidepressant effect of BoNT is significant, and, surprisingly, is observed for a broad range of injection sites.

Switchover study of onabotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA for facial dystonia

IMPORTANCE

When making a cost-saving it is important to ensure there is no loss of efficacy.

BACKGROUND

Clinical effectiveness and efficiency of incobotulinumtoxinA compared to onabotulinumtoxinA in facial dystonia is unclear. Our aim is to evaluate switching from onabotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of essential blepharospasm (EB), hemifacial spasm (HFS) and aberrant facial nerve regeneration (AFR).

DESIGN

A retrospective study of a prospective, single-masked switchover audit from onabotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty essential EB, 12 HFS and six AFR patients.

METHODS

A switchover from stable onabotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA using a 1:1 unit ratio and contemporaneous efficacy measures. Two nurse injectors performed the injections over a period of 6 years. Each masked patient received three onabotulinumtoxinA and three incobotulinumtoxinA over a minimum of 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME METHODS

At each visit, a blepharospasm disability score (BDS), Jankovic score (JS), subjective improvement (SI), duration of maximum effect (DME) and complications were recorded. A cost comparison per unit dose was made.

RESULTS

Twenty EB, 12 HFS and six AFR received 114 onabotulinumtoxinA and 114 incobotulinumtoxinA treatments. Both brands had similar efficacy, but SI (P < .01) and DME (P < .05) were higher in the HFS group with incobotulinumtoxinA. Complications included bruising (two onabotulinumtoxinA, one incobotulinumtoxinA) and ptosis (three onabotulinumtoxinA, zero incobotulinumtoxinA). OnabotulinumtoxinA was 33% pricier.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Switching from onabotulinumtoxinA to incobotulinumtoxinA did not result in an inferior outcome for the treatment of facial dystonia and led to a cost-saving for the department.

A review on iatrogenic botulism

Background:

With the flourishing application of botulinum toxin cosmetically and therapeutically is the emergence of iatrogenic botulism, a new type of botulism in addition to the traditional ones.

Objectives:

We aim at a comprehensive review of the clinical characteristics of iatrogenic botulism. Methods: The available publications are retrieved and studied.

Results:

Botulinum toxin blocks cholinergic transmission in the neuromuscular junctions and autonomic ganglia. The blockade can spread from the site of tissue injection to adjacent or sometimes far off structures, resulting in inadvertent disabling or even lethal effects. On literature review, weakness and dysphagia are the commonest complications of iatrogenic botulism, whereas ophthalmological and oropharyngeal symptoms are more prevalent in the cosmetic group and dyspnea in the therapeutic group. Antitoxin therapy is required in about 20% of the patients. Diagnosis of iatrogenic botulism is primarily clinical and should not be confused with the neurological diagnoses possessing similar clinical manifestations. Vigilance to the drug formulation, dosage, and administration during botulinum toxin injection are part of the preventive measures in minimizing the occurrence of iatrogenic botulism.

Conclusion:

While overlapping with the traditional types of botulism, iatrogenic botulism carries its unique clinical characteristics.

FDA Approvals and Consensus Guidelines for Botulinum Toxins in the Treatment of Dystonia

In 2016, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) published practice guidelines for botulinum toxin (BoNT) in the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache. This article, focusing on dystonia, provides context for these guidelines through literature review. Studies that led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of each toxin for dystonia indications are reviewed, in addition to several studies highlighted by the AAN guidelines. The AAN guidelines for the use of BoNT in dystonia are compared with those of the European Federation of the Neurological Societies (EFNS), and common off-label uses for BoNT in dystonia are discussed. Toxins not currently FDA-approved for the treatment of dystonia are additionally reviewed. In the future, additional toxins may become FDA-approved for the treatment of dystonia given expanding research in this area.

IncobotulinumtoxinA for upper- and lower-limb spasticity in Japanese patients

Introduction: The safety and tolerability of incobotulinumtoxinA 400 U for upper- and lower-limb post-stroke spasticity was assessed in a small cohort of Japanese patients during the open-label lead-in tolerability periods (LITP) of two phase 3 studies (CTI-153029 and CTI-153030; Japan Pharmaceutical Information Centre).Methods: Adult patients received a single incobotulinumtoxinA injection session (total dose of 400 U) in the upper (J-PURE) or lower limb (J-PLUS). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-injection during the 12 week follow-up.Results: The LITP of J-PURE and J-PLUS included 11 patients each. Mild/moderate AEs were reported by 5/11 (45.5%) and 8/11 (72.7%) patients in J-PURE and J-PLUS, respectively. No serious AEs were reported. Non-serious, transient AEs of special interest reported by two patients in J-PURE comprised muscular weakness and eyelid ptosis. No patient discontinued due to AEs.Conclusion: Preliminary results in this small population suggest that incobotulinumtoxinA 400 U is well tolerated for treating upper- or lower-limb post-stroke spasticity in Japanese patients.

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Botox and Neuronox in the Management of Benign Essential Blepharospasm: A Split-face Study

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of Botox and Neuronox in the management of benign essential blepharospasm (BEB).

Methods

We performed a triple-masked, randomized control study to compare Botox and Neuronox in 48 eyes of 24 patients with BEB. All 24 patients randomly received Botox or Neuronox in the periorbital region in a masked, randomized split-face manner, keeping the injection sites and doses uniform. The toxin preparation, injection, and clinical evaluations were done by three independent observers. Objective outcome measures included improvement in the severity of spasm, grading of the functional visual status, changes in palpebral fissure height, lagophthalmos, superficial punctate keratitis and Schirmer's test at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and upon conclusion of the effect of the toxin. Subjective outcome measures included duration of the effect and a forced choice stating which half of the face was better. Evaluations were performed through clinical measurements, external digital photography, and high-definition videography.

Results

The mean duration of relief from spasms was 3.78 months (standard deviation, 1.58 months; range, 1 to 6 months). The improvement in the objective parameters like severity of spasm and functional visual status was statistically significant at the 2-week and 6-week follow-up visits (p < 0.001). The changes in palpebral fissure height, lagophthalmos, and superficial punctate keratitis were equally observed in both groups. At 2 and 6 weeks, three of 24 (12.5%) and one of 24 (4%) patients, respectively, reported an unequal effect between the two sides of the face, but this difference was not statistically significant. At final follow-up (conclusion of the toxin effect), patients reported equal effect with no preference for either hemiface. No statistically significant differences were found in the comparative analysis between the Neuronox and Botox groups.

Conclusions

Neuronox and Botox are comparable in terms of their safety and efficacy in the management of BEB.

Glucose hypometabolism in the visual cortex proportional to disease severity in patients with essential blepharospasm

Essential blepharospasm (EB) causes difficulty in eyelid opening because of involuntary movements of the orbicularis oculi muscle. Patients with EB have functional visual loss due to sustained eyelid closure. We examined cerebral glucose metabolism in 39 patients with EB (12 men and 27 women; mean age, 52.1 years) by using positron emission tomography with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose. Forty-eight eye open healthy subjects and 48 eye close healthy subjects served as controls. We analyzed and compared the data between the patients and controls by using both statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and regions of interest (ROIs). We defined ROIs on both sides of the posterior striate cortex, anterior striate cortex, extrastriate cortex, and thalamus. In SPM analysis, glucose hypometabolism were observed in both sides of the extrastriate cortex compared to eye open controls but not to eye close controls. We also observed a significant negative correlation between the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) sum score and relative glucose metabolism level in the striate cortex of these patients. ROI analysis, a significant correlation was observed between the JRS sum score and glucose metabolism level in the posterior (right: r = −0.53, P = .0005; left: r = −0.65, P = .00001) and anterior (right: r = −0.33, P = .04; left: r = −0.37, P = .02) striate cortices of patients with EB. We surmise that the interruption of visual input cause glucose hypometabolism in the visual cortex of patients with EB.

•

Glucose hypometabolism (GM) in the visual cortex in patients with blepharospasm was observed.

•

GM level in the visual cortex of blepharospasm was same as that of eye close healthy subjects.

•

Negative correlation was observed between severity and GM level in the striate cortex of patients.

•

The results of this study reflect the visual symptoms of patients with blepharospasm.

Six-Month Comparative Analysis Monitoring the Progression of the Largest Diameter of the Sweating Inhibition Halo of Different Botulinum Toxins Type-A

BACKGROUND

Excessive sweating is a clinical condition that can be improved with type-A botulinum toxin (BTX-A).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the largest diameter of sweating inhibition halo (SIH) of 5 different commercially available BTX-A, in five different doses, in a 6-month-long clinical evaluation.

METHODS

Twenty-five adult female volunteers were injected in the dorsal trunk area with both 100 units (100UI) and 500 units (500UI) BTX-A products, reconstituted in a ratio of 1:2.5 IU, respectively. Products were applied in five different concentrations (1:2.5U, 2:5U, 3:7.5U, 4:10U, and 5:12.5U). After 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 days, a starch-iodine test was performed to obtain the largest diameter of each SIH.

RESULTS

The higher the number of units used, the larger the SIH p < 0.05 for all BTX-A. However, Botox®, Botulift®, Dysport®, and Prosigne® have pretty likewise SIH along the study, with some few differences for some doses and months between one and another. However, Xeomin® is the BTX-A with the smallest SIH, in comparison with all others, in any dose and period.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were observed among all brands of BTX-As, based on dose and time after injection. Xeomin® provides the smallest SIH in comparison with others BTX-A.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

The role of human serum albumin and neurotoxin associated proteins in the formulation of BoNT/A products

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is synthesized as a progenitor toxin complex (PTC) by Clostridium botulinum. This PTC comprises, in addition to the neurotoxin itself, neurotoxin associated proteins (NAPs) which are composed of three hemagglutinins and one non-toxic, non-hemagglutinin protein. After oral ingestion, these NAPs protect the neurotoxin from the low pH and proteases in the gastrointestinal tract and play a role in the entry via the intestinal barrier. Two of the three therapeutically used botulinum neurotoxin serotype A (BoNT/A) products (onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA) contain different amounts of NAPs, while incobotulinumtoxinA, lacks these proteins. In addition, human serum albumin (HSA) that is supposed to stabilize BoNT/A is added at different concentrations. Up to now, the function of the NAPs and HSA after parenteral therapeutic application is not completely understood. To investigate the influence of NAPs and HSA on potency of BoNT/A, we used the ex vivo mouse phrenic nerve hemidiaphragm assay. Increasing doses of HSA resulted dose-dependently in a more pronounced effect of BoNT/A. Though, a plateau was reached with concentrations of 0.8 mg/ml HSA and higher, the accessory addition of NAPs in a relevant amount (4 ng/ml) did not further enhance the effect of BoNT/A. In conclusion, in our ex vivo assay an adequate concentration of HSA prevented BoNT/A from loss of effect and supplementary NAPs did not alter this effect. A confirmation of these data in an in vivo assay is still lacking. However, it might be supposed that even in clinically applied BoNT/A products an increase of HSA accompanied by the avoidance of NAPs could potentially reduce the injected dose and, thus, the risk of unwanted side effects, the treatment costs as well as the risk of a secondary therapy failure due to BoNT/A neutralizing antibodies.

Use of botulinum toxin for movement disorders

The term movement disorders encompasses all disorders hypokinetic and hyperkinetic, which were previously known as extrapyramidal syndromes. With the definition of movement disorders and their diagnostic criteria and classifications, new studies for therapeutics could be performed. New drugs were launched, functional neurosurgery was developed, and the introduction of botulinum toxin (BoNT) for hyperkinesias was introduced. BoNT is an important therapy for dystonia, tics, myoclonus, and tremors. The aim of this review is to present the new and well-established uses of BoNT for movement disorders.

Pharmacological differences and clinical implications of various botulinum toxin preparations: a critical appraisal

Three different type A botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTAs) - onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA) - are currently marketed in Europe to treat several conditions. Differences between BoNTA preparations, which depend on their specific biotypes and manufacturing processes, lead to clinically relevant pharmacotherapeutic dissimilarities. All three available products are separately recognized and reviewed in American Academy of Neurology guidelines. The neurotoxin load/100U is likewise different among the different BoNTAs, with the result that the specific potency of the 150kD BoNTA neurotoxin is calculated as 137 units/ng for onabotulinumtoxinA, 154 units/ng for abobotulinumtoxinA, and 227 units/ng for incobotulinumtoxinA. It is important for clinicians to have all three BoNTAs available in order to choose the most suitable preparation for the specific indication in the single patient. Commercially available BoNTAs must be recognized as different from one another, and therefore as non-interchangeable. The essential experience of the clinician is of the utmost importance in choosing the most appropriate treatment.

IncobotulinumtoxinA Efficacy and Safety in Adults with Upper-Limb Spasticity Following Stroke: Results from the Open-Label Extension Period of a Phase 3 Study

Introduction

The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of upper-limb post-stroke spasticity in adults.

Methods

Adults 18–80 years of age with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity who completed the 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled main period (MP) of a phase 3 trial (NCT01392300) were eligible to enrol in the 36-week open-label extension period (OLEX). The OLEX included three treatment cycles at fixed 12-week injection intervals; subjects were injected with 400 U incobotulinumtoxinA into the affected upper limb. Efficacy assessments included evaluation of muscle tone using the Ashworth Scale (AS) and the Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) assessed by the investigator, subject, and caregiver. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was monitored throughout the OLEX.

Results

A total of 296 of 299 subjects (99.0%) who completed the MP received incobotulinumtoxinA in the OLEX, and 248 subjects completed the 36-week OLEX. The proportion of subjects with at least a 1-point improvement in AS score from each incobotulinumtoxinA treatment to the respective 4-week post-injection visit ranged by cycle from 52.3% to 59.2% for wrist flexors, 49.1% to 52.3% for elbow flexors, 59.8% to 64.5% for finger flexors, 35.5% to 41.2% for thumb flexors, and 37.4% to 39.9% for forearm pronators (P < 0.0001 for all). Over 90% of subjects were assessed by the investigator to be at least minimally improved (4 weeks post-injection) on the GICS during each injection cycle; 61.0% in the 1st cycle, 58.2% in the 2nd cycle, and 57.4% in the 3rd cycle were considered much improved or very much improved on the GICS. Three percent of subjects (9/296) reported treatment-related AEs; the most frequently reported were pain in the extremity (n = 2, 0.7%) and constipation (n = 2, 0.7%). Serious AEs were reported by 22 subjects (7.4%); however, none were considered treatment-related.

Conclusions

Repeated injections of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity led to significant improvements in muscle tone and investigator’s global impression of change. Treatment was well tolerated, with no serious treatment-related AEs.

Funding

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of the Dystonias

Dystonias are characterized by involuntary muscle contractions, twisting movements, abnormal postures, and often tremor in various body regions. However, in the last decade several studies have demonstrated that dystonias are also characterized by sensory abnormalities. While botulinum toxin is the gold standard therapy for focal dystonia, exactly how it improves this disorder is not entirely understood. Neurophysiological studies in animals and humans have clearly demonstrated that botulinum toxin improves dystonic motor manifestations by inducing chemodenervation, therefore weakening the injected muscles. In addition, neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence also suggests that botulinum toxin modulates the activity of various neural structures in the CNS distant from the injected site, particularly cortical motor and sensory areas. Concordantly, recent studies have shown that in patients with focal dystonias botulinum toxin ameliorates sensory disturbances, including reduced spatial discrimination acuity and pain. Overall, these observations suggest that in these patients botulinum toxin-induced effects encompass complex mechanisms beyond chemodenervation of the injected muscles.

Long-term outcome of flexible onabotulinum toxin A treatment in facial dystonia

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of onabotulinum used to treat facial dystonia and compare a flexible and fixed treatment regimen.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative study looking at benign essential blepharospasm (BEB), hemifacial spasm (HFS) and aberrant facial nerve regeneration synkinesis (AFR) treatment with onabotulinum toxin A (Botox®) over a minimum of 10 years. Fifty-one patients were recruited into the study, with each dystonia subgroup having 17 patients. Blepharospasm disability score (BDS), subjective improvement score (SIS), duration of maximal effect (DME) and complications were recorded at each visit.

RESULTS

The mean age was 63 years and gender predominately female. Thirty-seven patients underwent flexible treatment intervals compared to 14 fixed treatment intervals, averaging 3.4 and 4 per annum, respectively. Mean BDS significantly improved from 6 to 3 at last review across all 3 groups, with the highest effect on BEB. BDS improvement was greater in flexible intervals. SIS remained similar for all three conditions during follow-up, but in those undergoing flexible intervals, SIS increased by a small margin compared to fixed interval. Mean DME was 10.5 weeks across all dystonias, but increased progressively only in the flexible interval group. Complications included ptosis (30%), dry eye (14%) and lagophthalmos (8%).

CONCLUSION

Flexible onabotulinum provided better long-term relief on BDS for facial dystonia than a fixed regimen. Flexible interval treatment may also provide better patient satisfaction and longer DME compared to fixed treatment. Both have similar complication rates. With flexible treatment however, fewer injections were required over 10 years, leading to cost saving.

Comparing incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®): identical potency labelling in the hemidiaphragm assay

Botulinum toxin (BT) is provided by several manufacturers producing a number of different drugs. Their potency is given in internationally standardised mouse units (MU). Clinical practise, however, reveals that the potency labelling of different BT drugs may not be identical. We wanted to use the mouse diaphragm assay (MDA) to compare the two BT drugs onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) and incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO). For this, we measured the paresis time (PT) of different ONA or INCO doses. All BT came from several different and unexpired drug batches. PT for 20MU were 169.7 ± 28.9 min (ONA) and 132.3 ± 1.5 min (INCO) (p = 0.089), for 60MU 105.3 ± 10.1 min and 84.7 ± 4.2 min (p = 0.031), for 100MU 69.7 ± 1.5 min and 66.0 ± 7.0 min (p = 0.462) and for 140MU 74.7 ± 0.6 min and 62.3 ± 2.1 min (p = 0.100), respectively. The overall PT were 104.8 ± 12.5 and 86.3 ± 8.5 min (p = 0.178). Results presented here do not reveal differences in potency labelling between ONA and INCO, even when the full range of therapeutic doses are examined, although there was a trend towards stronger INCO effects. Data confirm previous reports on identical potency labelling of ONA and INCO. The MDA seems to be an appropriate instrument to test the potency labelling of other BT drugs as well, including new BT drugs currently under development.

Botulinum Toxin Type A Overdoses: Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

INTRODUCTION

Published literature on overdoses related to botulinum toxin A (BtxA) agents is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the BtxA drug class' respective agents for associations with overdose.

METHODS

United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database was utilized to search for overdoses. The analysis was conducted on data between second quarter 2014 and third quarter 2017. BtxA cases were included when they were considered the "Primary Suspect" drug. Overdose was defined as presence of 'overdose' being reported as an adverse event. Primary outcome was incidence of 'overdose' compared within the respective agents. Additionally, a disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) versus onabotulinumtoxinA as a referent while controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 3,837,406 unique adverse events were reported during the study period for all drugs in the FAERS database. Of which, 13,078 were BtxA cases. The rate of adverse events involving overdose for abobotulinumtoxinA (20.2%; 215/1065) was significantly higher than both onabotulinumtoxinA (0.4%; 48/11,323; p < 0.0001) and incobotulinumtoxinA (0.1%; 1/690; p < 0.0001). In the regression analysis, abobotulinumtoxinA (ROR 73.26; 95% CI 51.17-104.90) had a significant association with overdose, whereas incobotulinumtoxinA (ROR 0.73; 95% CI 0.10-5.36) did not, versus the referent onabotulinumtoxinA.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis showed adverse events of abobotulinumtoxinA were significantly associated with overdose versus the other two BtxA agents. Overdose can be difficult to research, particularly for in-clinic administered drugs. Future studies should venture to confirm these results in new and novel ways.

Incobotulinumtoxin A for Sialorrhea in Neurological Disorders: A Real-Life Experience

Botulinum toxin type A is one of the most useful treatments of sialorrhea in neurological disorders. Evidence for the use of incobotulinumtoxin A (inco-A) in the treatment of sialorrhea is limited. Thirty-six patients with sialorrhea were treated with infiltrations of inco-A into both parotid glands. The severity of sialorrhea was evaluated by the Drooling Severity Scale (DSS), and the Drooling Frequency Scale (DFS). Patients’ perceptions of clinical benefit were recorded via the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Following treatment, there was a significant difference in both the DFS and the DSS (p < 0.001). Clinical benefits on the basis of the PGI-I were present in up to 90% of patients.

Chemodenervation for the Treatment of Facial Dystonia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the medical literature on the outcomes and complications of various Food and Drug Administration-approved botulinum toxins for benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) and hemifacial spasm (HFS).

METHODS

Literature searches were last conducted in February 2017 in PubMed for articles published in English and in the Cochrane Library database without language limitations; studies published before 2000 were excluded. The combined searches yielded 127 citations. Of these, 13 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment, and the panel methodologist assigned ratings to them according to the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A combined total of 1523 patients (1143 with BEB and 380 with HFS) were included in the 13 studies. Five studies provided level I evidence, 2 studies provided level II evidence, and 6 studies provided level III evidence. Pretarsal injections were more efficacious than preseptal injections (96% vs. 86%, respectively). Pretarsal injections also resulted in a higher response rate on clinical scales (P < 0.05) and a longer duration of maximum response for both HFS and BEB. Patients with HFS require lower overall doses of onabotulinumtoxinA than patients with BEB for a similar duration of effect. Adverse events were dose related, and they occurred more frequently in patients who were given more units.

CONCLUSIONS

Level I evidence supports the efficacy of Botox (Allergan Corp., Irvine, CA), Meditoxin, and Xeomin (Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) for the treatment of BEB. Meditoxin and Botox have equivalent effectiveness and incidence of adverse events for BEB and HFS. Dysport (Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc, Paris, France) seems to have efficacy similar to Botox and Meditoxin for BEB and HFS, but any definitive conclusions from the 2 level II studies in this review are limited by differences in the methodologies used. Higher doses of Botox and Dysport result in more adverse events. Repeated treatments using Botox seem to maintain efficacy for treatment of facial dystonias over a follow-up period of at least 10 years, based on level III evidence.

Effect of the masseter muscle injection of botulinum toxin A on the mandibular bone growth of developmental rats

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of masticatory muscle injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) on the growth of the mandibular bone in vivo.

Methods

Eleven Sprague-Dawley rats were used, and BTX-A (n = 6) or saline (n = 5) was injected at 13 days of age. All injections were given to the right masseter muscle, and the BTX-A dose was 0.5 units. All of the rats were euthanized at 60 days of age. The skulls of the rats were separated and fixed with 10% formalin for micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis.

Results

The anthropometric analysis found that the ramus heights and bigonial widths of the BTX-A-injected group were significantly smaller than those of the saline-injected group (P < 0.05), and the mandibular plane angle of the BTX-A-injected group was significantly greater than in the saline-injected group (P < 0.001). In the BTX-A-injected group, the ramus heights II and III and the mandibular plane angles I and II showed significant differences between the injected and non-injected sides (P < 0.05). The BTX-A-injected side of the mandible in the masseter group showed significantly lower mandibular bone growth compared with the non-injected side.

Conclusion

BTX-A injection into the masseter muscle influences mandibular bone growth.

Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Facial Lines: Results From a Pooled Analysis of Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Clinical Studies

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA in aesthetics has been established in multiple studies. Although individual studies have been reported, a combined assessment of incobotulinumtoxinA safety across studies is not available.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency of adverse events (AEs) across prospective incobotulinumtoxinA studies in aesthetics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Safety data were assessed from 9 placebo-controlled or active-controlled single-dose studies on glabellar frown lines (GFL), crow's feet (CF), and upper facial lines (UFL). Analyses by treatment cycle included 4 repeat-dose studies on GFL and UFL.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred seventy-seven subjects received incobotulinumtoxinA (GFL, n = 1,189; CF, n = 83; UFL, n = 105) in single-dose studies (placebo-controlled studies: incobotulinumtoxinA, n = 866; placebo, n = 395). Over 1,000 subjects received incobotulinumtoxinA in repeat-dose studies (GFL, n = 880; UFL, n = 290). In placebo-controlled single-dose studies, incidences of treatment-related AEs ranged from 5.4% (GFL) to 22.9% (UFL). The most frequent treatment-related AE in single-dose studies was headache (GFL, 4.8%; UFL, 11.4%). In repeat-dose studies, incidence of AEs was highest during cycle 1 (GFL, 8.9%; UFL, 17.2%) and decreased across treatment cycles. No serious treatment-related AEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Results confirm the favorable safety and tolerability of incobotulinumtoxinA. The frequency of treatment-related AEs was low and may decrease with subsequent treatments.

Surgical approach to limiting skin contracture following protractor myectomy for essential blepharospasm

Purpose

To report our experience with protractor myectomy in patients with benign essential blepharospasm who did not respond to serial botulinum toxin injection, and to describe intra- and postoperative techniques that limited skin contracture while also providing excellent functional and cosmetic results.

Methods

The medical records of patients with isolated, benign, essential blepharospasm who underwent protractor myectomy from 2005 to 2008 by a single surgeon were reviewed retrospectively. The technique entailed operating on a single eyelid during each procedure, using a complete en bloc resection of all orbicularis tissue, leaving all eyelid skin intact at the time of surgery, and placing the lid under stretch with Frost suture and applying a pressure dressing for 5-7 days.

Results

Data from 28 eyelids in 7 patients were included. Average follow-up was 21.5 months (range, 4-76 months). Of the 28 eyelids, 20 (71.4%) showed postoperative resolution of spasm, with no further need for botulinum toxin injections. In the 8 eyelids requiring further injections, the average time to injection after surgery was 194 days (range, 78-323 days), and the average number of injections was 12 (range, 2-23 injections). All but one eyelid had excellent cosmetic results, without signs of contracture; one eyelid developed postoperative skin contracture following premature removal of the Frost suture and pressure dressing because of concerns over increased intraocular pressure.

Conclusions

In our patient cohort, this modified technique resulted in excellent cosmetic and functional results and limited postoperative skin contracture.

Efficacy of IncobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines in Male Subjects: Post-Hoc Analyses From Randomized, Double-Blind Pivotal Studies

BACKGROUND

Males are increasingly seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures such as botulinum toxin injection. However, few studies have specifically examined the efficacy of such procedures among men.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA for treating glabellar frown lines (GFLs) in men.

METHODS

Three incobotulinumtoxinA studies were included in post hoc analyses of responder rates: 2 pivotal Phase 3 US registration studies for GFLs (n = 55 males in a pooled analysis) and a European pivotal Phase 3 study for upper facial lines (UFLs; n = 21 males).

RESULTS

In the pooled analysis of Phase 3 GFL studies, 55.9% of males and 81.4% of females were responders on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) at 30 days. Similarly, 54.5% and 88.0% of males and females, respectively, treated for GFLs in the upper facial line study were responders on the Merz Aesthetics Scales (MAS) at 30 days. Lower proportions of male responders on the Facial Wrinkle Scale /Merz Aesthetics Scales were consistent with results from onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA GFL studies.

CONCLUSION

Compared with females, males demonstrate lower response rates on wrinkle severity scales in studies on all 3 available botulinum toxins. Variations in treatment response are potentially associated with key male anatomic differences (e.g., muscle mass). Results emphasize the need for customized treatment plans.

Pharmacological therapies for pain in Parkinson's disease - a review paper

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative movement disorder characterized by the loss of dopamine containing cells in the substantia nigra, with pain being one of the most common, yet frequently misunderstood symptoms. The prevalence of pain in PD populations ranges from 40-85% and is usually categorized under the following types: i) musculoskeletal pain ii) radicular and neuropathic pain iii) dystonia-related pain iv) akathitic pain and iv) central parkinsonian pain. Areas covered: The aim of this literature review was to document and present the common and uncommon pharmaceutical therapies that treat and/or alleviate these types of pain in PD. The PubMed database was searched with keywords: "Parkinson's disease", "Pain", and "Pharmacological Therapies". Research articles involving randomized, controlled trials were included as well as case studies and qualitative studies. Expert commentary: Given the increased prevalence of pain in PD populations, there is a need for a clear understanding of the types of pain treatments available and how they can be best combined to fit the specific needs of each patient.

Newly Designed Quinolinol Inhibitors Mitigate the Effects of Botulinum Neurotoxin A in Enzymatic, Cell-Based, and ex Vivo Assays

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) is one of the most deadly toxins and is the etiological agent of the potentially fatal condition, botulism. Herein, we investigated 8-hydroxyquinoline (quinolin-8-ol) as a potential inhibitor scaffold for preventing the deadly neurochemical effects of the toxin. Quinolinols are known chelators that can disrupt the BoNT/A metalloprotease zinc-containing active site, thus impeding its proteolysis of the endogenous protein substrate, synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25). By use of this information, the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the quinolinol-5-sulfonamide scaffold was explored through preparation of a crude sulfonamide library and evaluation of the library in a BoNT/A LC enzymatic assay. Potency optimization of the sulfonamide hit compounds was undertaken as informed by docking studies, granting a lead compound with a submicromolar K_i. These quinolinol analogues demonstrated inhibitory activity in a cell-based model for SNAP-25 cleavage and an ex vivo assay for BoNT/A-mediated muscle paralysis.

A Quantitative Analysis of OnabotulinumtoxinA, AbobotulinumtoxinA, and IncobotulinumtoxinA: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Clinical Trial of Comparative Dynamic Strain Reduction

BACKGROUND

U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved formulations of botulinum toxin include onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, Calif.), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport; Galderma Pharma S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland), and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany). This study uses digital image correlation to compare dynamic strain reduction between available neurotoxins.

METHODS

Seventy-three treatment-naive female patients aged were randomized to injection with onabotulinumtoxinA (20 units), abobotulinumtoxinA (60 units), or incobotulinumtoxinA (20 units) in the glabella. Imaging was conducted at 4, 14, and 90 days after injection. Change in average dynamic strain of the glabella was compared using ANOVA.

RESULTS

At day 4, there was a 42.1 percent strain reduction in the onabotulinumtoxinA group, a 39.4 percent strain reduction in the abobotulinumtoxinA group, and a 19.8 percent strain reduction in the incobotulinumtoxinA group (onabotulinumtoxinA versus abobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.77; onabotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.02; and abobotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.04). At day 14, there was a 66.1 percent strain reduction in the onabotulinumtoxinA group, a 51.4 percent strain reduction in the abobotulinumtoxinA group, and a 42.8 percent strain reduction in the incobotulinumtoxinA group (onabotulinumtoxinA versus abobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.14; onabotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.02; and abobotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.36). At day 90, there was a 43.5 percent strain reduction in the onabotulinumtoxinA group, a 38.4 percent strain reduction in the abobotulinumtoxinA group, and a 25.3 percent strain reduction in the incobotulinumtoxinA group (onabotulinumtoxinA versus abobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.66; onabotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.12; and abobotulinumtoxinA versus incobotulinumtoxinA, p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Using digital image correlation, the tested neuromodulators do not have equivalent strain reduction in the glabella at the doses used. These results confirm assertions of noninterchangeability.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

In-vivo comparison of the neurotoxic potencies of incobotulinumtoxinA, onabotulinumtoxinA, and abobotulinumtoxinA

Three botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products, incobotulinumtoxinA, onabotulinumtoxinA, and abobotulinumtoxinA, all manufactured by different methods, are employed in clinical practice. Comparing the three BoNT/A products is difficult because their concentrations and volumes differ and the precise dose equivalence ratio is not known. We aimed to compare the neurotoxic potencies by a systematic analysis of injected volume and dose. The potency of BoNT in inducing hind limb paresis was assessed by analyzing the wheel-running performance of mice. To standardize the volume, the effect of an identical dose of incobotulinumtoxinA dissolved in different volumes of saline (15, 10, 5, and 2μl) was studied in four groups of mice (n=13-15). The potencies of the BoNT products were then compared by injecting identical volumes (10μl) containing different doses into both hind leg muscles. Mice injected with incobotulinumtoxinA showed a volume-dependent reduction in wheel-running, with larger volumes inducing more intense paresis. A standardized volume containing the same number of mouse units of the BoNT/A products produced different degrees of paresis. The conversion ratio of incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA is estimated to be between 1:0.75 and 1:0.5. OnabotulinumtoxinA displayed a two-fold greater potency than abobotulinumtoxinA. Doses of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA that produce an identical severity of pareses even result in the same duration of pareses. This wheel-running assay allows one to compare the neurotoxic potency of different volumes and doses of the BoNT products in vivo. Our results argue against common clinical practice because incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA are not readily interchangeable and a two-fold dose of abobotulinumtoxinA is needed to induce an effect identical to onabotulinumtoxinA. In addition, this emphasizes that the duration of BoNT-induced effect is the same as long as equipotent doses of BoNT are injected.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated botulinum toxin treatment model for blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm compared to standard care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm are debilitating conditions that significantly impact on patient quality of life. Cyclical treatment with botulinum toxin injections offers temporary relief, but the duration of treatment efficacy is variable. The standard model of patient care defines routine fixed-time based scheduled treatment cycles which may lead to unnecessarily frequent treatment for some patients and experience of distressing symptoms in others, if symptoms return before the scheduled follow-up period.

Methods/Design

A randomised controlled trial will compare a patient-initiated model of care, where patients determine botulinum toxin treatment timing, to the standard model of care in which care is scheduled by the clinical team. A sample of 266 patients with blepharospasm or hemifacial spasm will be recruited from Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH), London. The trial will be accompanied by a mixed-methods evaluation of acceptability of the new service. Patients who meet eligibility criteria will be assessed at baseline and those in the intervention group will be provided with instructions on how to book their own treatment appointments. Patients in both groups will be followed up 3 and 9 months into the trial and all patients will be returned to usual care after 9 months to meet safety protocols. Primary outcome measures include disease severity (questionnaire), functional disability (questionnaire) and patient satisfaction with care (questionnaire). Secondary outcomes include disease-specific quality of life (questionnaire), mood (questionnaire), illness and treatment perceptions (questionnaire and semi-structured interviews), economic impact (questionnaire) and acceptability (questionnaire and semi-structured interviews).

Discussion

This trial will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patient-led care model for botulinum toxin therapy. If the new model is shown to be effective in reducing distress and disability in these populations and is found to be acceptable to patients, whilst being cost-effective, this will have significant implications for service organisation across the NHS.

Trial registration

UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN) Portfolio 18660. Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT102577224 (registered 29 October 2015)

Conversion Ratio between Botox®, Dysport®, and Xeomin® in Clinical Practice

Botulinum neurotoxin has revolutionized the treatment of spasticity and is now administered worldwide. There are currently three leading botulinum neurotoxin type A products available in the Western Hemisphere: onabotulinum toxin-A (ONA) Botox(®), abobotulinum toxin-A (ABO), Dysport(®), and incobotulinum toxin A (INCO, Xeomin(®)). Although the efficacies are similar, there is an intense debate regarding the comparability of various preparations. Here we will address the clinical issues of potency and conversion ratios, as well as safety issues such as toxin spread and immunogenicity, to provide guidance for BoNT-A use in clinical practice. INCO was shown to be as effective as ONA with a comparable adverse event profile when a clinical conversion ratio of 1:1 was used. The available clinical and preclinical data suggest that a conversion ratio ABO:ONA of 3:1-or even lower-could be appropriate for treating spasticity, cervical dystonia, and blepharospasm or hemifacial spasm. A higher conversion ratio may lead to an overdosing of ABO. While uncommon, distant spread may occur; however, several factors other than the pharmaceutical preparation are thought to affect spread. Finally, whereas the three products have similar efficacy when properly dosed, ABO has a better cost-efficacy profile.