Comparison of the effects of 12 months of monthly minodronate monotherapy and monthly minodronate combination therapy with vitamin K2 or eldecalcitol in patients with primary osteoporosis

Impact of prior teriparatide treatment on the effectiveness of romosozumab in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A case-control study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of prior teriparatide (TPTD) treatment on the effectiveness of romosozumab (ROMO) in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective, case-controlled, multicenter study, 323 postmenopausal patients were initiated ROMO. Of these, 275 were treatment-naïve, and 48 were switched from TPTD, with uninterrupted ROMO treatment for 12 months. Propensity score matching was applied to ensure clinical comparability, yielding 44 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics included a mean age of 78.0 years, lumbar spine (LS) T-score of -3.6, and total hip (TH) T-score of -2.8. Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone turnover markers were evaluated over the 12-month period.

RESULTS

The increasing rate in the bone formation marker PINP was significantly greater in the treatment-naïve group compared to the TPTD-switched group throughout the 1-12 month period. Conversely, the reduction in the bone resorption marker TRACP-5b was similar between the groups, indicating a diminished anabolic window in the TPTD-switched group. After 12 months, the TPTD-switched group showed lower BMD gains in the LS (10.3 % vs. 17.3 %; P = 0.002) and TH (3.1 % vs. 7.8 %; P = 0.002) compared to the treatment-naïve group. Multiple regression analysis revealed positive associations between the 12-month percentage BMD increases (LS; β = 0.30; 95 % CI = 0.85-11.61; P = 0.024 / TH; β = 0.32; 95 % CI = 0.51-8.56; P = 0.028) and being treatment-naïve compared to prior TPTD treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior TPTD treatment may attenuate the effectiveness of ROMO, potentially due to diminished bone formation activation.

Pro-Osteogenic and Anti-Inflammatory Synergistic Effect of Orthosilicic Acid, Vitamin K2, Curcumin, Polydatin and Quercetin Combination in Young and Senescent Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

During aging, bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)-the precursors of osteoblasts-undergo cellular senescence, losing their osteogenic potential and acquiring a pro-inflammatory secretory phenotype. These dysfunctions cause bone loss and lead to osteoporosis. Prevention and intervention at an early stage of bone loss are important, and naturally active compounds could represent a valid help in addition to diet. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the combination of two pro-osteogenic factors, namely orthosilicic acid (OA) and vitamin K2 (VK2), and three other anti-inflammatory compounds, namely curcumin (CUR), polydatin (PD) and quercetin (QCT)-that mirror the nutraceutical BlastiMin Complex^® (Mivell, Italy)-would be effective in promoting MSC osteogenesis, even of replicative senescent cells (sMSCs), and inhibiting their pro-inflammatory phenotype in vitro. Results showed that when used at non-cytotoxic doses, (i) the association of OA and VK2 promoted MSC differentiation into osteoblasts, even when cultured without other pro-differentiating factors; and (ii) CUR, PD and QCT exerted an anti-inflammatory effect on sMSCs, and also synergized with OA and VK2 in promoting the expression of the pivotal osteogenic marker ALP in these cells. Overall, these data suggest a potential role of using a combination of all of these natural compounds as a supplement to prevent or control the progression of age-related osteoporosis.

Role of Vitamin K in Bone and Muscle Metabolism

Vitamin K, a cofactor for the γ-glutamyl carboxylase enzyme, is required for the post-translational activation of osteocalcin and matrix Gla protein, which play a key role in bone and muscle homeostasis. In vivo and in vitro models for osteoporosis and sarcopenia suggest the vitamin K could exert a positive effect in both conditions. In bone, it increases osteoblastogenesis, whilst decreases osteoclast formation and function. In muscle, it is associated with increased satellite cell proliferation and migration and might play a role in energy metabolism. Observational trials suggest that high levels of vitamin K are associated with increased bone mineral density and reduced fracture risk. However, interventional studies for vitamin K supplementation yielded conflicting results. Clinical trials in sarcopenia suggest that vitamin K supplementation could improve muscle mass and function. One of the main limitations on the vitamin K studies are the technical challenges to measure its levels in serum. Thus, they are obtained from indirect sources like food questionnaires, or levels of undercarboxylated proteins, which can be affected by other environmental or biological processes. Although current research appoints to a beneficial effect of vitamin K in bone and muscle, further studies overcoming the current limitations are required in order to incorporate this supplementation in the clinical management of patients with osteosarcopenia.

Two-year effectiveness of zoledronic acid with or without eldecalcitol in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: A randomized prospective study

Objectives

This study aims to examine the 2-year outcomes of zoledronic acid (ZOL) with or without eldecalcitol (ELD) on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture in Japanese patients with osteoporosis.

Methods

The subjects were 98 patients who were randomly (1:1) assigned to treatment with ZOL combined with ELD (ZOL + ELD group; n = 51) and ZOL alone (ZOL group; n = 47). Treatment efficacy was examined based on a comparison of changes in BMD from baseline (ΔBMD) in the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck in the 2 groups.

Results

The percent change from baseline in BMD values for the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at 24 months were 10.8% ± 6.1%, 6.0% ± 6.6%, and 5.1% ± 5.1%, respectively, in the ZOL + ELD group, and 7.7% ± 6.2%, 5.1% ± 5.6%, and 2.9% ± 8.3%, respectively, in the ZOL group. The percent change from baseline BMD for the lumbar spine at 24 months differed significantly between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

The effect of a combination of ZOL + ELD on BMD for 24 months was more favorable than that of ZOL alone. This drug combination is promising for the treatment of drug-naïve Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis.

Effects of eldecalcitol alone or a bone resorption inhibitor with eldecalcitol on bone mineral density, muscle mass, and exercise capacity for postmenopausal women with distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures are often the first fractures experienced by adults with osteoporosis, and such fractures provide an opportunity for treatment to prevent a domino effect of future fractures. Most of these fractures result from falls, which may be related to the individual's limb muscle mass, strength, and exercise capacity. Active vitamin D3 positively affects muscle and bone mass. However, the effect of a bone resorption inhibitor is unknown. This study aimed to determine the effects of eldecalcitol alone or a bone resorption inhibitor with eldecalcitol on bone mass, limb muscle mass, and exercise capacity of osteoporotic patients with distal radius fractures and to identify the preventive effects against future fractures.

METHODS

Participants were postmenopausal women(n = 99) with distal radius fractures who visited the orthopedics outpatient department in a city general hospital from April 2015 to October 2017. Bone mass, limb muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass index, and muscle strength (grip strength and quadriceps muscle strength), walking speed, 2-step results, and timed up and go tests results were evaluated before and after 1 year of treatment. The instances of fall recurrence and refracture were investigated using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients completed follow-up assessments for 1 year. After treatment, bone mass and bone mineral density were significantly improved in the lumbar spine and total proximal femur compared to before treatment. Furthermore, skeletal muscle mass index, grip strength on the unaffected side, quadriceps muscle strength, walking speed and 2-step test results after 1 year of treatment were significantly improved. Nineteen and 4 patients experienced fall recurrence and refracture, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Eldecalcitol alone or a bone resorption inhibitor with eldecalcitol improved bone mass and bone mineral density, and maintained skeletal muscle mass index, muscle strength, and exercise capacity of osteoporotic patients with distal radius fractures.

Effects of risedronate, alendronate, and minodronate alone or in combination with eldecalcitol on bone mineral density, quality, and strength in ovariectomized rats

Combination therapy of active vitamin D₃ with some bisphosphonates (BPs) has been reported to be clinically beneficial. However, combination therapy of eldecalcitol (ELD) with BP has to date not been validated as to whether it is beneficial in the clinical setting. Preclinical studies suggested that simultaneous treatment with ELD and some BPs is more effective than monotherapy. However, the relative potency of various BPs, when used in combination with ELD, is completely unknown. In this study, we examined and compared the effects of risedronate (RIS), alendronate (ALN), and minodronate (MIN) alone or in combination with ELD on bone mass, microarchitecture, strength, and material properties in ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats aged 13 weeks. RIS, ALN, MIN, and ELD were administered five times weekly for 16 weeks. Micro-computed tomography analysis, compression test, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) imaging analysis were performed 16 weeks after treatment initiation. Trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD) in the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4) significantly increased in the RIS + ELD, ALN + ELD, and MIN + ELD groups compared with the vehicle group. Moreover, the bone microarchitecture of L4 in all the BP + ELD groups also significantly improved. On mechanical testing of L4, the maximum load was significantly increased in the RIS + ELD and ALN + ELD groups. FTIR analysis revealed that the mineral-to-collagen ratio of trabecular bone in L3 of all the BP + ELD groups was significantly increased compared with the vehicle group. By contrast, the carbonate-to-phosphate ratio, a parameter of mineral immaturity, was significantly decreased in the RIS + ELD and ALN + ELD groups. BP + ELD improved the BMD and structural properties of the bone to a similar extent. RIS + ELD and ALN + ELD also improved bone strength. Furthermore, treatment with BP + ELD improved the bone material. These results suggest that the combination therapy of BP and ELD is beneficial and warrants further clinical trials.

•

Combination of bisphosphonates and eldecalcitol was superior to either monotherapy.

•

Bone quality on FTIR imaging analysis correlated with bone strength.

•

Combined bisphosphonate and eldecalcitol may be useful in the clinical setting.

Safety and Efficacy of Zoledronic Acid Treatment with and without Acetaminophen and Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis

Objectives We aimed to investigate the safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) combined with acetaminophen (APAP) regarding both the adverse events and the efficacy of ZOL combined with an eldecalcitol (ELD) in a randomized clinical trial conducted in patients with primary osteoporosis. Methods A total of 109 patients were administered ZOL 5 mg and then were randomly assigned to the following groups (3:2:1): those treated with ZOL, those treated with ZOL combined with APAP and ELD, and those treated with ZOL combined with ELD. For the analyses, the groups were classified into four treatment groups: patients treated with APAP (APAP group) and without APAP (non-APAP group), and those treated with ELD (ELD group) and without ELD (non-ELD group). The incidence rates of symptomatic adverse events were compared between the APAP and non-APAP groups, and the efficacy was compared between the ELD and non-ELD groups. Results In the APAP and non-APAP groups, the incidence rates of symptomatic adverse events were 20.6% and 44.6% (p=0.009), respectively. Age and APAP use were found to be significant factors associated with adverse events. The percent changes in the bone mineral density values from baseline (ΔBMD) in the ELD and non-ELD groups at 12 months were 8.2% and 6.2% for the lumbar spine, 4.2% and 4.0% for the total hip, and 3.9% and 2.2% for the femoral neck, respectively. The ΔBMD of all sites did not differ significantly between the ELD and non-ELD groups. Conclusion In ZOL treatment, the co-administration of APAP should thus be considered as a therapeutic option to reduce the occurrence of symptomatic adverse events stemming from ZOL treatment in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis, particularly in younger patients.

The therapeutic effect to eldecalcitol + bisphosphonate is superior to bisphosphonate alone in the treatment of osteoporosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease. Bisphosphonate (BP) and eldecalcitol (ELD) are two clinical first-line drugs for osteoporosis patients. However, the effect of ELD + BP vs. BP alone on osteoporosis treatment is still unclear. The present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the different therapeutic effect of BP + ELD vs. BP alone in osteoporosis treatment.

METHODS

Eligible documents that selected from online databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were included in this study (updated to March 3, 2020). The quality assessment of the included studies was based on the guidelines of Cochrane. Meta-analysis was performed according to criteria such as intervention plan and outcome. The indicators including bone mineral density (BMD) in all enrolled studies were included in the current analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models. Then, heterogeneity analysis was performed based on Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 4 studies (456 cases) with high quality were enrolled in this study. The effect of ELD + BP was superior to BP alone based on indicators including femoral neck BMD (FN-BMD) and total hip BMD (TH-BMD) in patients with followed up ≤ 6 months. Moreover, the effect of ELD + BP was superior to BP alone based on lumbar spine BMD (LS-BMD) in patients with 12 months followed up.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic effect of ELD + BP was superior to BP alone in osteoporotic patients based on the influence of BMD.

Managing acute cancer pain

Cancer-related pain is an ongoing concern for patients and families. Clinicians should include pain management or palliative care specialists who have advanced knowledge in pharmacotherapy and who have the ability to perform interventional procedures to help alleviate patients' pain and reduce opioid use. This article discusses available interventions for patients with cancer pain.

Effects of monthly minodronate with or without eldecalcitol addition in osteoporosis patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An 18-month prospective study

Objectives

Increasing bone mineral density (BMD) to reduce fracture risk is a primary goal of osteoporosis treatment. This prospective, observational study evaluates the effects of monthly minodronate (MIN; 50 mg) with or without eldecalcitol (ELD) addition in osteoporosis patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during 18 months.

Methods

The cohort was prospectively and randomly split into the MIN monotherapy group (14 cases) and MIN plus ELD group (combination group; 14 cases) due to no reports on the effectiveness and safety of MIN therapy in relation to ELD addition for comparisons of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and BMD of the lumbar 1–4 vertebrae (L-BMD), bilateral total hips (H-BMD; the mean value of the right and left hips), and bilateral femoral necks (FN-BMD) at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment.

Results

Baseline values were comparable between the groups apart from a tendency for higher TRACP-5b in the combination group. Seven of 14 patients in the combination group had received previous bisphosphonate treatment. BAP was significantly more reduced in the monotherapy group at 6 months, with no other remarkable differences for TRACP5b, L-BMD, H-BMD, or FN-BMD during the observation period.

Conclusions

The above findings suggest that regardless of ELD addition, MIN potentially improves BMD during 18 months in osteoporosis patients with RA.

Minodronate for the treatment of osteoporosis

Minodronate is a third-generation bisphosphonate that was developed and approved for clinical use in osteoporosis therapy in Japan. The mechanism of action for suppressing bone resorption is the inhibition of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, a key enzyme in the mevalonic acid metabolic pathway of osteoclasts, to induce apoptosis of the cells. Minodronate is the strongest inhibitor of bone resorption among the currently available oral bisphosphonates. Large randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials have revealed an increase in bone mineral density of both the lumbar spine and femoral neck over 3 years of daily minodronate therapy and risk reduction in vertebral fractures over 2 years of therapy. The increase in bone mass and the prevention of vertebral fractures are similar to those with alendronate or risedronate. The incidence of adverse events, especially gastrointestinal disturbance, is the same as or less than that with weekly or daily alendronate or risedronate. The unique mechanism of action of minodronate via the inhibition of the P2X(2/3) receptor compared with other bisphosphonates may be an advantage in reducing low back pain in patients with osteoporosis. The monthly regimen of minodronate, introduced in 2011, is expected to have better patient adherence and longer persistence. In experimental animal models, minodronate preserved, or even ameliorated, bone microarchitectures, including microcracks and perforation of the trabeculae in the short term. The lowest incidence of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw among all bisphosphonates and the lack of atypical femoral fractures attributed to its use to date, however, are partly because only a smaller population used minodronate than those using other bisphosphonates. To date, minodronate is available only in Japan. Hip fracture risk reduction has not been verified yet. More clinical studies on minodronate and its use in osteoporosis treatment, with a large number of subjects, should be conducted to verify hip fracture risk reduction and long-term results.

Comparison of the effects of denosumab between a native vitamin D combination and an active vitamin D combination in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

The aim of this 12-month, retrospective study was to compare the effects of denosumab (DMAb; 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months) plus native vitamin D (VD) (cholecalciferol) combination therapy with DMAb plus active VD analog (alfacalcidol) combination therapy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Patients [N = 127; mean age 75.6 years (range 58-93 years); 28 treatment-naïve patients, 59 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, 40 patients treated with teriparatide daily] were allocated to either (1) the DMAb plus native VD group (n = 60; cholecalciferol, 10 μg, plus calcium, 610 mg/day; 13 treatment-naïve patients, 28 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, and 19 patients treated with teriparatide daily) or (2) the DMAb plus active VD group [n = 67; alfacalcidol, 0.8 ± 0.0 μg, plus calcium, 99.2 ± 8.5 mg/day; 15 treatment-naïve patients, 31 patients treated with oral bisphosphonate therapy, and 21 patients treated with teriparatide daily) on the basis of each physician's decision. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), serum bone turnover marker levels, and fracture incidence were monitored every 6 months. There were no significant differences in baseline age, BMD, bone turnover marker levels, and prior treatments between the two groups. After 12 months, compared with the DMAb plus native VD group, the DMAb plus active VD group showed similar increases in the BMD of the lumbar spine (6.4% vs 6.5%) and total hip (3.3% vs 3.4%), but significantly greater increases in the BMD of the femoral neck (1.0% vs 4.9%, P < 0.001) and the distal part of the forearm (third of radius) (-0.8% vs 3.9%, P < 0.01). These tendencies were similar regardless of the differences in the prior treatments. The rates of decrease of bone turnover marker levels were similar for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (-49.0% vs -49.0%), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (-45.9% vs -49.3%), and undercarboxylated osteocalcin (-56.0  vs -66.5%), whereas serum intact parathyroid hormone levels were significantly lower in the DMAb plus active VD group (47.6 pg/mL vs 30.4 pg/mL, P < 0.001). The rate of hypocalcemia was 1.7% in the DMAb plus native VD group and 1.5% in the DMAb plus active VD group, and the rate of clinical fracture incidence was 8.3% in the DMAb plus native VD group and 4.5% in the DMAb plus active VD group, with no significant difference between the groups. DMAb with active VD combination therapy may be a more effective treatment option than DMAb with native VD combination therapy in terms of increasing BMD of the femoral neck and distal part of the forearm and also maintaining serum intact parathyroid hormone at lower levels.

Changes of bone mineral density and serum pentosidine during a 27-month follow-up of monthly minodronate in osteoporotic patients

PURPOSE

Monthly regimen of minodronate for osteoporosis more than two years has not been reported yet. The aim of this study is to elucidate the effect of monthly minodronate (M-MIN) on bone mineral density (BMD) and serum pentosidine (Pen) during 27 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of 52 newly treated patients (73.3 ± 8.8 years) (new group) and 47 patients (75.9 ± 9.5 years) who were switched from either alendronate or risedronate (switch group). Monthly minodronate (50 mg/every 4 weeks) was administered for 27 months. Lumbar, femoral neck, and total hip BMDs and serum pentosidine were monitored at baseline and after 9, 18, and 27 months of treatment.

RESULTS

In the new condition, lumbar, neck, and total hip BMDs increased significantly by 9.07%, 3.15%, and 3.06%, respectively. Only the lumbar BMD significantly increased in the switch condition. Serum Pen increased in both groups in a time-dependent manner. In the group switch, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the initial change in serum intact procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) at 9 months was an independent predictor of changes in neck and total hip BMDs at 27 months (OR = 1.039, 95% CI 1.003-1.077, p = 0.032 for neck and OR = 1.055, 95% CI 1.009-1.104, p = 0.020 for total hip).

CONCLUSIONS

Monthly minodronate treatment increased BMDs in newly treated patients over 27 months. Serum Pen increased with M-MIN therapy, possibly indicating prolonged bone turnover. The initial 9-month changes in serum P1NP predicted the 27-month changes in hip BMDs when M-MIN replaced alendronate or risedronate.

The safety and effectiveness profile of eldecalcitol in a prospective, post-marketing observational study in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: interim report

This large-scale post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of eldecalcitol treatment in patients with osteoporosis in a Japanese clinical setting. A total of 3567 patients with osteoporosis were enrolled and received eldecalcitol 0.75 μg/day for 12 months. For this interim report, 3285 patients were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 74.9 ± 8.7 years; 86.8 % (2854/3285) were women. There were 142 reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in 129 patients (3.92 % of the total 3285 patients): the most common were hypercalcemia and increased blood calcium (0.88 %), renal impairment (0.27 %), abdominal discomfort (0.24 %), constipation (0.24 %), and pruritus (0.24 %). The incidence of ADRs was 5.10 % in men and 3.74 % in women. Although 10 serious ADRs were reported in 9 patients (0.27 %), no clinically significant safety issues were identified. Incidence of hypercalcemia or increased blood calcium was 8.47 % in patients with renal impairment and only 0.74 % in patients without renal impairment. At last observation, the incidence of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures was 2.44 % and 1.70 %, respectively. There was a significant increase in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and distal radius. The bone turnover markers BAP, serum NTX, urinary NTX, and TRACP-5b were suppressed by eldecalcitol treatment in both sexes. In conclusion, consistent with the findings of the phase III pivotal clinical trial, eldecalcitol was shown to have a favorable safety profile and effectiveness in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. However, periodic measurements of serum calcium were required to prevent occurrence of hypercalcemia during eldecalcitol treatment, especially in patients with renal impairment.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of ibandronate and minodronate combined with eldecalcitol in primary osteoporosis of women: A 1-year follow-up study

Objectives

This is an open labeled and retrospective cohort study which compared the effectiveness and safety of ibandronate (IBN) and minodronate (MIN) combined with eldecalcitol (ELD) in primary osteoporosis of women.

Methods

One hundred and forty-eight primary osteoporotic women were classified into 3 groups; 1) intravenous IBN combined with oral ELD (IBN + ELD group, N = 50; 81.8 ± 6.2 years), 2) oral MIN combined with oral ELD (MIN + ELD group, N = 50; 77.2 ± 6.9 years) and 3) oral ELD alone (ELD group, N = 48; 75.0 ± 8.3 years). For statistical analysis, lumbar spine bone mineral density (L-BMD), hip total bone mineral density (H-BMD), serum corrected calcium (Ca), serum inorganic phosphorus (iP), intact-parathyroid hormone (PTH), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), serum homocysteine (Hcy), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine calcium / creatinine (Ca/Cr) ratio were measured until 12 months after the start of therapy.

Results

L-BMD values increased significantly in both IBN + ELD and MIN + ELD group, however, H-BMD increased significantly in the IBN + ELD group only. TRACP-5b values decreased rapidly during the first 6 months in both IBN + ELD and MIN + ELD group. However, BAP value in the IBN + ELD group decreased more gradually compared with that in the MIN + ELD group. Both serum Ca value and urine Ca/Cr ratio tended to increase, and the eGFR value decreased significantly in each group.

Conclusions

IBN combined with ELD administration can act more effectively to increase BMD compared with MIN combined with ELD administration. Differences of decreasing rate in TRACP-5b and BAP value may lead to differences of increased rate of BMD in the IBN + ELD and MIN + ELD group. Because many cases of osteoporosis are elderly persons associated with chronic kidney disease, monitoring of kidney function and concentration of Ca in blood and urine is essential.

The effects of switching daily teriparatide to oral bisphosphonates or denosumab in patients with primary osteoporosis

The aim of this 12-month, observational study was to compare the effects of switching daily teriparatide (TPTD) to oral bisphosphonates (BP) therapy or denosumab (DMAb) therapy in patients with primary osteoporosis. Patients [n = 78; 71 postmenopausal women and seven men; mean age 76.3 (64-94) years; mean duration of prior daily TPTD therapy 20.1 (6-24) months] were allocated to either the (1) "switch-to-BP" group [n = 36; weekly alendronate 35 mg (n = 19), weekly risedronate 17.5 mg (n = 12), monthly minodronate 50 mg (n = 5)]; or (2) "switch-to-DMAb" group (n = 42; 60 mg sc every 6 months) based on each physicians' decision. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone turnover markers were monitored every 6 months. No significant difference was observed in baseline clinical characteristics between the groups. After 12 months, the increase in BMD was significantly greater in the switch-to-DMAb group compared to the switch-to-BP group: lumbar spine (6.2 vs. 2.6 %; P < 0.01), total hip (4.2 vs. 1.1 %; P < 0.05), and femoral neck (3.5 vs. 1.4 %; P < 0.05). In addition, the patients in the switch-to-DMAb group showed a significant decrease compared to those in the switch-to-BP group in TRACP-5b (-55.8 vs. -32.8 %; P < 0.01) and ucOC (-85.5 vs. -65.0 %; P < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed in PINP (-67.5 vs. -62.1 %). Switching daily TPTD to DMAb significantly increased BMD and decreased bone resorption marker compared to switching to oral BP at 12 months, and thus may provide an effective sequential treatment option after daily TPTD treatment.

Vitamin K2 Induces Mitochondria-Related Apoptosis in Human Bladder Cancer Cells via ROS and JNK/p38 MAPK Signal Pathways

The effects of vitamin K2 on apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells have been well established in previous studies. However, the apoptotic effect of vitamin K2 on bladder cancer cells has not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to examine the apoptotic activity of Vitamin K2 in bladder cancer cells and investigate the underlying mechanism. In this study, Vitamin K2 induced apoptosis in bladder cancer cells through mitochondria pathway including loss of mitochondria membrane potential, cytochrome C release and caspase-3 cascade. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPK was detected in Vitamin K2-treated cells and both SP600125 (an inhibitor of JNK) and SB203580 (an inhibitor of p38 MAPK) completely abolished the Vitamin K2-induced apoptosis and loss of mitochondria membrane potential. Moreover, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was detected in bladder cancer cells, upon treatment of vitamin K2 and the anti-oxidant N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) almost blocked the Vitamin K2-triggered apoptosis, loss of mitochondria membrane potential and activation of JNK and p38 MAPK. Taken together, these findings revealed that Vitamin K2 induces apoptosis in bladder cancer cells via ROS-mediated JNK/p38 MAPK and Mitochondrial pathways.

Effects of switching weekly alendronate or risedronate to monthly minodronate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-month prospective study

Switching weekly ALN or RIS to monthly MIN in patients with RA, of whom two-thirds were treated with low-dose PSL, significantly decreased bone turnover markers and increased BMD at 12 months, suggesting that monthly MIN may be an effective alternative treatment option of oral bisphosphonate treatment.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this prospective, observational study was to evaluate the effects of switching weekly alendronate (ALN 35 mg) or risedronate (RIS 17.5 mg) to monthly minodronate (MIN 50 mg) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patient characteristics were as follows: n = 172; 155 postmenopausal women, age 65.5 (44–87) years; T-score of lumbar spine (LS), −1.4; total hip (TH), −1.8; femoral neck (FN), −2.1; dose and rate of oral prednisolone (2.3 mg/day), 69.1 %; prior duration of ALN or RIS, 46.6 months; were allocated, based on their preference, to either the (1) continue group (n = 88), (2) switch-from-ALN group (n = 44), or (3) switch-from-RIS group (n = 40).

RESULTS

After 12 months, increase in BMD was significantly greater in group 3 compared to group 1: LS (4.1 vs 1.2 %; P < 0.001), TH (1.9 vs −0.7 %; P < 0.01), and FN (2.7 vs −0.5 %; P < 0.05); and in group 2 compared to group 1: LS (3.2 vs 1.2 %; P < 0.05) and TH (1.5 vs −0.7 %; P < 0.01). The decrease in bone turnover markers was significantly greater in group 3 compared to group 1: TRACP-5b (−37.3 vs 2.5 %; P < 0.001), PINP (−24.7 vs −6.2 %; P < 0.05), and ucOC (−39.2 vs 13.0 %; P < 0.05); and in group 2 compared to group 1: TRACP-5b (−12.5 vs 2.5 %; P < 0.05) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching weekly ALN or RIS to monthly MIN in patients with RA may be an effective alternative treatment option of oral bisphosphonate treatment.