Management manual for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL): position statement of the JSBMR

Bone Health Management in Men Commencing Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer and Women Commencing Anti-Oestrogen Therapy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with prostate and breast cancer, the commonest cancer in men and women, respectively, has markedly improved with advances in early diagnosis, treatment and multi-disciplinary care by the oncology and surgical community. However, the use of increasingly potent endocrine therapies may cause bone loss, resulting in secondary osteoporosis.

REVIEW

This review summarises the current management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in this group of patients at high risk of osteoporotic fractures with their attendant morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Bone health is an increasingly important part of cancer survivorship. Radiation and medical oncologists, urologists, bone health experts, general practitioners, healthcare professional bodies and bone health and cancer consumer organisations should increase awareness of the potential adverse effect of endocrine therapy on bone health. While this should never delay cancer treatment, bone health should be part of routine care for men and women receiving endocrine therapy for prostate and breast cancer.

Longitudinal assessment of bone mineral density in prostate cancer patients: comparing metastatic and non-metastatic regions

OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have increased risks of decreased bone mineral density (BMD). However, there are no established guidelines for assessing BMD in patients with bone metastases. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ADT on bone health by comparing longitudinal changes in BMD between prostate cancer patients with and without bone metastases.

METHODS

A single-center observational study was conducted from February 2020 to January 2023 at Kobe University Hospital. BMD at the lumbar vertebrae, total hip, and femoral neck was measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Bones were classified into Metastatic Site (with metastases), Non-metastatic Sites (from patients with bone metastases), and Control (patients without metastases) groups. All patients received luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonists or agonists plus oral ARSI or bicalutamide for 1 year.

RESULTS

Among the 78 patients, 35, 110, and 245 bones were classified into the Metastatic Site group, Non-metastatic Sites group, and Control group, respectively. The Metastatic Site group exhibited significantly higher T-scores compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). Repeated measures analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction in T-scores over time across all groups (P < 0.001). However, no significant interaction was observed between group classification and time (P = 0.817).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that BMD changes at non-metastatic sites in patients with bone metastases are similar to those in patients without metastases. Monitoring BMD at non-metastatic sites may provide valuable insights into ADT's effects on bone health in prostate cancer patients.

Effect of bisphosphonate and denosumab treatment on TBS in Japanese breast cancer patients with AIBL

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates and denosumab increase bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporosis treatment in patients with aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL). This study aimed to directly compare bisphosphonates with denosumab in treating patients with AIBL and to determine the effect of denosumab on the trabecular bone score (TBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with AIBL receiving osteoporosis treatment (21 in the bisphosphonates group and 18 in the denosumab group) were retrospectively evaluated for changes in lumbar spine and femoral BMD, lumbar spine bone quality (assessed by TBS), and blood bone metabolic markers. The Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

After 24 months of treatment, the lumbar spine BMD change rate was 5.82 ± 1.10% with bisphosphonates and 10.49 ± 1.20% with denosumab, with the change rate of denosumab significantly increasing over that of bisphosphonates. The change rate in femoral BMD was 2.69 ± 1.16% with bisphosphonates and 2.95 ± 1.26% with denosumab, with no significant difference between the two groups. The rate of decrease in tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b was significantly higher in the denosumab group. The change rate in TBS at 24 months of treatment was 0.53 ± 1.26% in the bisphosphonates group and 1.08 ± 1.33% in the denosumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups. After 24 months, TBS remained stable.

CONCLUSION

Both bisphosphonates and denosumab may increase BMD, improve bone metabolism, and inhibit bone quality loss in patients with AIBL.

Efficacy of a single 5 mg zoledronic acid infusion in preventing bone loss and fracture in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is common among breast cancer patients, requiring comprehensive assessment and intervention. Zoledronic acid, a strong inhibitor of bone resorption, is effective in CTIBL management, though information on dosing and intervals, particularly the efficacy of the 5 mg annual dose for osteoporosis in breast cancer patients, is limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this 12-month prospective observational study, 85 breast cancer patients were divided into three groups: 17 received no treatment, 17 received tamoxifen, and 51 received anastrozole or letrozole (AI). Post-surgery, patients were administered a single 5 mg dose of zoledronic acid and monitored over 12 months for changes in bone mineral density (BMD), fracture rates, and biochemical markers.

RESULTS

Initially, the AI group was the oldest, averaging 59.1 ± 8.7 years. At baseline, no significant differences in variables, except age, were observed. After 12 months, BMD increased in all groups following a single zoledronic acid dose, with the smallest increase in the AI group at the lumbar spine: no treatment (2.4% ± 6.1%), tamoxifen (2.6% ± 3.4%), AI (0.6% ± 14.5%) (p = 0.778). CTx and P1NP levels were consistently suppressed up to 12 months post-treatment, with smaller reductions in the AI group. There were no significant differences in fracture or bone metastasis rates among groups.

CONCLUSION

A single infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid was effective in increasing bone density in breast cancer patients. However, AI-treated patients showed less improvement in vertebral bone mineral density and biochemical markers. Further long-term studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Temporal declines in bone mineral density and trabecular bone score during androgen deprivation therapy

INTRODUCTION

The trabecular bone score (TBS) has emerged as a convenient measure for assessing the microstructure of trabecular bone in the second through fourth lumbar vertebrae (L2-4) and can be conducted concurrently with bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. This study was performed to evaluate changes in BMD and the TBS during ADT for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who had prostate cancer without bone metastases at Kobe University Hospital were studied from March 2020 to December 2021. BMD and TBS were measured every 6 months from the start of treatment using Hologic Horizon devices (Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were followed for 2 years. Significant declines in BMD (-3.8% for femoral neck, -4.2% for total hip, and -6.1% for lumbar spine) and TBS (-16.6%) were noted after 2 years of ADT. Correlation analyses revealed a weak correlation between lumbar spine BMD and TBS at ADT initiation, but this correlation strengthened after 2 years. The multiple regression analysis results suggested that the rate of BMD loss may be slower in patients with a preserved pretreatment TBS.

CONCLUSION

In patients without bone metastases undergoing ADT for prostate cancer, notable decreases were found in both BMD and TBS over a 2-year treatment period. Factors influencing the TBS decline remain unclear; however, patients with a lower pretreatment TBS exhibited a more rapid decline in BMD.

Chemotherapy effects on bone mineral density and microstructure in women with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy involves the administration of steroids to prevent nausea and vomiting; however, its effect on bone microstructure remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microstructure associated with chemotherapy using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in women with early breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective single-arm observational study included non-osteoporotic, postmenopausal women with breast cancer. The patients underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), HR-pQCT, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b) or procollagen type-I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) measurements at baseline, end of chemotherapy, and 6 months after chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the change in total volumetric BMD at the distal tibia and radius.

RESULTS

Eighteen women were included in the study (median age: 57 years; range: 55-62 years). At 6 months after chemotherapy, HR-pQCT indicated a significant decrease in total volumetric BMD (median: distal tibia -4.5%, p < 0.01; distal radius -2.3%, p < 0.01), cortical volumetric BMD (-1.9%, p < 0.01;  -0.8%, p = 0.07, respectively), and trabecular volumetric BMD (-1.1%, p = 0.09;  -3.0%, p < 0.01, respectively). The DXA BMD also showed a significant decrease in the lumbar spine (median: -4.5%, p < 0.01), total hip (-5.5%, p < 0.01), and femoral neck (-4.2%, p < 0.01). TRACP-5b and P1NP levels were significantly increased at the end of chemotherapy compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Postmenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for early breast cancer experienced significant BMD deterioration in weight-bearing bone, which was further reduced 6 months after chemotherapy.

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTBL) is associated with anti-tumor treatments, including endocrine therapies, chemotherapeutic treatments, radiotherapy, glucocorticoids, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Osteoporosis, characterized by the loss of bone mass, can increase the risk of fractures, leading to mortality and long-term disability, even after cancer remission. Cancer and osteoporosis have marked clinical and pathogenetic similarities. Both have a multifactorial etiology, affect the geriatric population, and markedly influence quality of life. Lifestyle management, including calcium and vitamin D supplementation, is recommended but the supporting evidence is limited. Oral and injectable bisphosphonates are effective for osteoporosis and malignant bone disease. Bisphosphonates increase bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CTBL. Denosumab is also used in the management of CTBL; in clinical trials, it improved BMD and reduced the risk of fracture. Currently, there are no bone anabolic therapies for patients with cancer. Appropriate therapies are necessary to maintain optimal bone health, particularly in patients at heightened risk.

Androgen deprivation therapy-related fracture risk in prostate cancer: an insurance claims database study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely used for the treatment of prostate cancer. ADT is associated with reduced bone density leading to an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to quantify fracture risk in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer in real-world practice in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the Japanese Medical Data Vision (MDV) database. Men initiating ADT for treatment of prostate cancer between April 2010 and March 2021 were identified and matched to a cohort of prostate cancer patients not taking ADT using a propensity score. Fracture rates were estimated by a cumulative incidence function and compared between cohorts using a Cox cause-specific hazard model. Information was extracted on demographics, comorbidities and bone densitometry.

RESULTS

30,561 men with PC starting ADT were matched to 30,561 men with prostate cancer not treated with ADT. Following ADT initiation, <5% of men underwent bone densitometry. Prescription of ADT was associated with an increased fracture risk compared to not taking ADT (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.63 [95% CI 1.52-1.75]).

CONCLUSION

ADT is associated with a 1.6-fold increase in the risk of osteoporotic fracture in men with prostate cancer. Densitometry in this population is infrequent and monitoring urgently needs to be improved in order to implement effective fracture prevention.

Osteoporotic fracture risk in women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors: a health insurance claims database study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Hormone therapy with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for estrogen receptor-dependent breast cancer may expose patients to an increased osteoporosis risk. This study was performed to estimate fracture risk in women with breast cancer to whom AIs were prescribed in Japan.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database. Women with breast cancer prescribed AIs over a 12-month period were identified and matched to women not prescribed AIs using a propensity score. Fracture rates were estimated by a cumulative incidence function and compared using a cause-specific Cox hazard model. The proportion of women undergoing bone density tests was retrieved.

RESULTS

For all fractures sites combined, cumulative fracture incidence at 10 years was 0.19 [95%CI: 0.16-0.22] in women prescribed AIs and 0.18 [95%CI: 0.15-0.21] without AIs. AI prescription was not associated with any changes in risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.08 [95%CI: 0.99-1.17] p = 0.08). Women prescribed AI more frequently underwent bone density testing (31.9% [95% CI: 31.2%; 32.6%] versus 2.2% [95% CI: 2.0%; 2.4%]).

CONCLUSIONS

The anticipated association between AI exposure and osteoporotic fracture risk in Japanese women with breast cancer was not seen clearly.

Validation of JSBMR's CTIBL manual for Japanese men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer causes cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL), increases the fracture risk 2-3 times, and worsens life prognoses. The Japan Society of Bone and Mineral Research (JSBMR) created a CTIBL treatment manual in 2020; however, no study has validated its use in patients with ADT/CTIBL prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study classified 124 patients with prostate cancer without bone metastasis who received ADT into high- and low-risk groups using the JSBMR CTIBL algorithm. Comparisons were made with the period to incident vertebral fracture and the existing International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) classification.

RESULTS

The median age was 74 years; the median observation period was 81 months. At 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years, the prevalence of incident vertebral fractures was, respectively, 3.3%, 10.7%, 17.9%, 21.4%, and 31.2% in the entire population; 13%, 27%, 36%, 42%, and 58% in the high-risk group (19%); and 1%, 7%, 14%, 17%, and 25% in the low-risk group (81%). The hazard ratio between the two groups was 3.57 (p = 0.0004). Based on multivariate analysis, age, previous vertebral fracture and femoral neck bone density were significant risk factors for incidental vertebral fracture. The JSBMR had a hazard ratio of 3.26 (p = 0.04) relative to 1.13 (p = 0.84) for the IOF, indicating the JSBMR classification performed better.

CONCLUSION

Taking preventive measures against fractures is necessary, including starting bone-modifying agents early in patients with a high fracture risk. The JSBMR CTIBL manual may be useful for this purpose.

Fanconi Syndrome Associated with Long-term Treatment with Zoledronate

Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy is used to prevent fractures in the management of bone metastasis. However, it may induce renal damage. We herein report an 81-year-old woman with Fanconi syndrome and osteomalacia who had been diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and received treatment with zolendronate for over 5 years. Her bone markers normalized after switching zolendronate to denosmab and starting vitamin D and mineral supplementation. This case shows that chronic renal damage induced by zolendronate can cause osteomalacia. In patients with intravenous zolendronate therapy, close monitoring of renal and bone markers is needed, even under long-term therapy.

Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer

Breast cancer and prostate cancer are sex hormone-dependent cancers, and estrogen or androgen suppression therapy is the standard treatment. Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL): bone loss and osteoporosis have become important side effects of these therapies. To summarize the current evidences, (1) Endocrine therapy for breast cancer and prostate cancer is associated with a significant decrease in bone mineral density. (2) Aromatase inhibitors (AI) for breast cancer are associated with a significant increase in fractures, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer is likely to be associated with an increase in fractures. (3) Administration of bisphosphonates and denosumab increases bone mass in patients undergoing endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Administration of bisphosphonates, denosumab, and SERMs increased bone mass in patients undergoing ADT therapy for prostate cancer. (4) Bisphosphonates and denosumab reduce fracture risk in patients on AI for breast cancer, and toremifene and denosumab in patients on ADT for prostate cancer.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with prostate cancer

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer was published in 2020. It was therefore decided, by both the ESMO and the Singapore Society of Oncology (SSO), to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in November 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to take into account the differences associated with the treatment of prostate cancer in Asia. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with prostate cancer across the different regions of Asia.

Assessment of bone health in patients with prostate cancer using cancer staging computed tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) values from computed tomography (CT) in cancer staging as a supplementary screening tool for bone health among prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

T-scores of bone mineral density (BMD) in each lumbar vertebra (L1-L4) and hip for newly diagnosed PCa patients (N = 139) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The degenerative changes in each lumbar vertebra were assessed, and the HU values of trabecular bone in axial CT images of each vertebral body (vertebral CT-HU value) were measured using staging CT.

RESULTS

556 vertebrae were analyzed. 326 of 556 (59%) lumbar vertebrae had degenerative changes. The vertebral CT-HU value was positively correlated with the lumbar BMD T-score, with higher correlation coefficients observed in vertebrae without degenerative changes (r = 0.655, N = 230) when compared to vertebrae with degenerative changes (r = 0.575, N = 326). The thresholds matching BMD T-scores of - 2.0 and - 1.5 set by cancer treatment-induced bone loss guidelines were 95 HU and 105 HU, respectively. Based on the intervention threshold (lumbar BMD T-score <  - 1.5), 15.1% of PCa patients required osteoporosis treatment; and, this value increased to 30.9% when L1-L4 CT-HU thresholds that corresponded to BMD T-score <  - 1.5 were used.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar BMD values from DXA may not reflect true bone health in PCa patients who often have lumbar degenerative diseases. Thresholds based on the vertebral CT-HU value can be used as a supplementary method to identify PCa patients who need anti-osteoporosis drugs.

Quality of Life Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivors: State of the Art in Targeted Rehabilitation Strategies

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the most prevalent cause of mortality in women. Advances in early diagnosis and more effective adjuvant therapies have improved the long-term survival of these patients. Pharmacotherapies and intrinsic tumor-related factors may lead to a wide spectrum of treatment-related disabling complications, such as breast cancer-related lymphedema, axillary web syndrome, persistent pain, bone loss, arthralgia, and fatigue. These conditions have a detrimental impact on the health-related quality of life of survivors. Here, we sought to provide a portrait of the role that rehabilitation plays in breast cancer survivors. Particular emphasis has been placed on recovering function, improving independence in activities of daily living, and reducing disability. This complex scenario requires a precision medicine approach to provide more effective decision-making and adequate treatment compliance.

Effects of once-yearly zoledronic acid on bone density and incident vertebral fractures in nonmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the effective treating prostate cancer but is often accompanied by cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL), which impairs the patient's quality of life. In patients with nonmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (M0CSPC) who already have osteoporosis before starting ADT, appropriate bone-modifying agent intervention must be performed in parallel, as the patient has a high risk of future fracture. However, little is known about therapeutic interventions aimed at preventing the progression of CTIBL and new fractures. The present study explored the effect of once-yearly zoledronic acid 5 mg (ZOL 5 mg) on bone mineral density (BMD) and new vertebral fractures (VFs) in M0CSPC patients with coexisting osteoporosis before starting ADT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional, cohort study involving 42 M0CSPC patients with osteoporosis who had undergone ADT with/without a single intravenous infusion of ZOL 5 mg at the start of ADT (ZOL 5 mg group, n = 26; control group, n = 16). The association of the ZOL 5 mg with changes in the BMD from baseline to 12 months and the incidence of VFs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Prevalent VFs were found in 47.6% of all patients at baseline. ZOL 5 mg significantly increased the lumbar spine BMD (LS-BMD) (mean rate of change: + 4.02%, p < 0.0001) and significantly decreased the TRACP-5b (mean rate of change: - 52.1%, p < 0.0001) at 12 months after starting ADT. Incident VFs were identified in 19.0% of all patients at 12 months after starting ADT. After adjusting for the age, BMI, and changes in the LS-BMD, ZOL 5 mg was not significantly associated with incident VFs (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.04-11.3, p = 0.7774).

CONCLUSION

ZOL 5 mg significantly increased the LS-BMD 12 months after starting ADT, and our short-term results showed that ZOL 5 mg was not significantly correlated with the suppression of incident vertebral fractures.